Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 - Port Burwell Phase I II Environmental Site Assessment;ITERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. July 10, 2013 CB664.00 Public Works & Government Services Canada 4900 Yonge Street, 11th Floor Toronto, Ontario M2N 6A6 Attention: Ms. Claudia Simonato Senior Environmental Specialist Re: Final Report on Environmental Property Assessment Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour DFRP# 54022 Port Burwell, Ontario PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 Dear Ms. Simonato: Terrapex is pleased to provide our final report on the Environmental Property Assessment conducted at the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour located in Port Burwell, Ontario. We have included one electronic copy on CD-ROM, containing a PDF file of the full report. Terrapex appreciated the opportunity to provide our services on this project. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. Geoff Lussier Project Manager 920 Brant Street, Unit 16, Burlington, Ontario, L7R 4J1 Ph: (905) 632-5939 Fax: (905) 632-6793 �'�7TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES CANADA ENVIRONMENTAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT PORT BURWELL SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO PWGSC PROJECT NUMBER R.059352.008/.009 DFRP#54022 FINAL REPORT JULY 10, 2013 Terrapex Environmental Ltd. 920 Brant Street, Unit 16 Burlington, Ontario, L7R 4J1 Telephone: (905) 632-5939 Facsimile: (905) 632-6793 Email: burlington@terrapex.com Website: www.terrapex.com DISTRIBUTION: PWGSC 1 CD COPY PROJECT # CB664.00 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. 1 COPY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Terrapex Environmental Ltd. (Terrapex) was retained by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to conduct a Phase 1/11 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the DFO Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour (SCH) located in Port Burwell, Ontario. The Port Burwell SCH property comprises land and water lots encompassing an area of approximately 78.27 hectares (ha). The subject site consists primarily of water lots, and includes part of the bed of Big Otter Creek, part of the bed of Lake Erie and some land not covered by water. The Directory of Federal Real Property (DFRP) lists the Port Burwell SCH with the property number 54022. The custodian is listed as DFO and the property is Crown - owned for the listed use of transportation (marine). The only building present onsite is a vacant Canadian Coast Guard automation building located southwest of the harbour. The building had been previously classified as Contaminated Site 00013964, however, DFRP lists the building has being previously assessed and no further action is required. There are no other buildings present on the subject site. The Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory (FCSI) identified two Contaminated Sites at Port Burwell SCH. FCSI 00012785 identifies sediment sampled 11 m east of the west wharf (east of Talisman aboveground storage tanks) is impacted with metals and organochlorine pesticide (OCP). FCSI 00012786 indentifies sediment sampled 26 m west of the concrete pier (north corner) is impacted with OCP. These Contaminated Sites are associated with the water lots of the Port Burwell SCH property. The Phase I ESA identified the following Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APECs) as follows: • APEC 1 (Parts 2,6, and 7 on Plan 11R-6760): APEC 1 comprises the water lots encompassing the downstream portion of Big Otter Creek and a portion of Lake Erie, as well as portions of land and infilled harbour areas west of the water lots. Potential environmental concerns associated with the land and infilled harbour areas include unknown fill quality and current and historical activities associated with APEC 2. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), OCPs and metals/inorganics impacts to sediment have been previously identified at the site and documented in the MacViro Consultants Ltd. report entitled Enhanced Phase 1 Site Assessment, Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Site No. 4766, (March 2001). Additional potential environmental concerns to the sediment at APEC 1 include the current and historical activities associated with APEC 2 and APEC 3. • APEC 2: APEC 2 comprises the off-site lands adjacent to the west property boundary of the subject site. Potential environmental concerns at APEC 2 which may impact APEC 1 include the historical transportation and storage of coal, potash, fertilizers, and bulk fuel oil, PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 i and the current handling and storage of petroleum products at three aboveground storage tanks (ASTs): two located on the Port Burwell Facility property adjacent to the west of the site and one located at Bradfields Marina adjacent to the northwest of the site. • APEC 3: APEC 3 comprises the off-site lands adjacent to the east property boundary of the subject site. Potential environmental concerns at APEC 3 which may impact APEC 1 include the historical transportation and storage of coal, potash, fertilizers, and fuel oil, and the historical location of locomotive rail infrastructure, including a locomotive roundhouse structure. Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA, the Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPCs) at the subject site are Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs), metals/inorganics, PAHs, and OCPs. The significant findings and results from the Phase II ESA are described below: • Drilled borehole sampling locations, as well as surficial and cored sediment sampling locations were selected to assess near -surface and subsurface conditions at APEC 1, including areas previously identified as impacted, as well as to investigate potential impacts to the site associated with sources of potential contamination identified at APEC 2 and APEC 3. • Three boreholes (MW101 to MW103) were advanced across the subject site, to a depth of 7.6 m below grade. Monitoring wells were installed into each of the three drilled boreholes. • Three sediment cores (SED1 to SED3) were advanced to depths ranging from 6.1 to 7.6 m below water surface of Big Otter Creek to collect surficial and subsurface sediment samples. Three additional surficial sediment samples (SED4, SED6, and SED9) were collected from APEC 1, and three surficial sediment samples were collected from outside the study area to determine background sediment conditions at the site (SED5, SED7, and SED8). Laboratory analytical results of the Phase II ESA identified contaminants of concern (CDCs) at APEC 1 as follows: • The concentration of PHC F2 exceeded the applicable Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canada Wide Standard (CWS) in one soil sample. • Concentrations of one or more of methylnaphthalene, 1-, 2-, and 1- & 2- (total), naphthalene, and phenanthrene exceeded the CCME Soil Quality Guideline (SQG) or Ministry of Environment (MOE) Table 9 Standards, where CCME SQGs do not exist, in three soil samples. • An Index of Additive Cancer Risk (IACR) greater than the applicable CCME SQG was calculated for one soil sample. 11:11.7t7_1»41:1,11W 1 z r►i A 14-ki k IFTA 009 a PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 ry ir:19611> • Concentrations of acenaphthylene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, phenanthrene and pyrene exceeded the applicable CCME Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) in one sediment core sample. • Concentrations of one or more of PHC F3 and F4 were greater than 20% above the corresponding calculated background concentration in five sediment samples (including one field duplicate). • Concentrations of one or more of manganese, phosphorus, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG, or MOE Lowest Effect Level (LEL) where CCME ISQGs do not exist, in five sediment surficial samples and three sediment core samples. • Concentrations of one or more of p,p'-DDD, o,p'- + p,p'- DDD, p,p'-DDE, o,p'- + p,p'- DDE, and Total DDT exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG, or MOE LEL where CCME ISQG do not exist, in three sediment surficial samples and two sediment core samples. Concentrations of one or more of o,p'- + p,p'- DDD, o,p'- + p,p'- DDE, and Total DDT also exceeded the CCME Probable Effect Level (PEL) in the three sediment surficial samples and two sediment core samples. • Concentrations of one or more of arsenic and iron exceeded the applicable Environment Canada Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guideline (FIGQG) or CCME Canadian Water Quality Guideline (CWQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (PAL) Freshwater (FW) in three groundwater samples. Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA, the land portions and infilled harbour areas within APEC 1 associated with the soil and groundwater impacts were assigned the contaminated site identifier CS0001. While the source of impacts identified at CS0001 do not appear to be associated with the current DFO operations at the site, APEC 2 represents a potential offsite source of contamination due to the historical handling and storage of bulk fuel, coal, potash, fertilizers, and other industrial commodities, as well as two ASTs currently located at APEC 2 (Port Burwell Harbour Facility west of the site), and one AST currently located at the Bradfield Marina upstream and northwest of the site, south of Bridge Street. In addition, dredgate removed from the inner harbour and used as fill on the land-based portions of CS0001 could represent a potential source of impact. The water lot portions of Big Otter Creek and the inner harbour of the Port Burwell SCH within APEC 1 associated with the sediment impacts were assigned the contaminated site identifier CS0002. CS0002 also incorporated the two existing sediment contaminated sites, FCSI 00012785 and FCSI 00012786, previously assigned to the Port Burwell SCH. While the source of impacts at CS0002 do not appear to be associated with the current DFO operations at the site, APEC 2 and APEC 3 represent potential offsite sources of contamination due to the historical handling and storage of bulk fuel, coal, potash, fertilizers, and other industrial commodities, as well as the current handling and storage of fuel at the marina upstream of the site. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................ i 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK............................................................................................. 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................... 5 3.0 METHODOLOGY...........................................................................................................8 3.1 PHASE I ESA WORK PROGRAM...................................................................... 8 3.1.1 RECORDS REVIEW............................................................................... 8 3.1.2 INTERVIEW PROGRAM......................................................................... 9 3.1.3 SITE INSPECTION................................................................................10 3.1.4 EVALUATION AND REPORTING..........................................................11 3.1.5 LIMITATIONS.........................................................................................12 3.2 PHASE II ESA WORK PROGRAM....................................................................12 3.2.1 PREPARATION......................................................................................12 3.2.2 SOIL.......................................................................................................13 3.2.2.1 BOREHOLE DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING .......................13 3.2.2.2 SOIL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM...............................................14 3.2.3 SEDIMENT.............................................................................................15 3.2.3.1 SEDIMENT SAMPLING...........................................................15 3.2.3.2 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL PROGRAM.....................................16 3.2.4 GROUNDWATER..................................................................................17 3.2.4.1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION.....................................17 3.2.4.2 WELL MONITORING..................................................................17 3.2.4.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING................................................18 3.2.4.4 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL PROGRAM ..........................19 3.2.5 SURVEY AND GPS...............................................................................19 4.0 RESULTS OF PHASE I ESA........................................................................................20 4.1 RECORDS REVIEW..........................................................................................20 4.1.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS......................................................................20 4.1.2 PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC RECORDS......................21 4.1.3 PROPERTY USE RECORDS.................................................................22 4.1.4 DATABASE RECORDS.........................................................................24 4.1.5 GOVERNMENT AND REGULATORY DOCUMENTATION ....................31 4.1.6 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS...........................................32 4.1.7 WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK................................................................35 PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C6664.00 iv 4.2 INTERVIEW PROGRAM....................................................................................36 5.1 FIELD 4.2.1 SITE REPRESENTATIVES....................................................................36 5.1.1 4.2.2 ADDITIONAL INTERVIEWS...................................................................37 5.1.2 4.3 SITE INSPECTION ............................................................................................38 5.1.3 4.3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION..............................................................................38 5.2 SELECTION OF APPLICABLE GUIDELINES/STANDARDS 4.3.2 SITE INFRASTRUCTURE......................................................................40 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER GUIDELINES..........................................47 4.3.3 MATERIALS HANDLING AND STORAGE.............................................41 SEDIMENT GUIDELINES......................................................................49 4.3.4 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND SPECIAL ATTENTION ITEMS ......42 4.3.5 ADJACENT PROPERTIES.....................................................................43 4.4 SUMMARY OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN ......... 43 5.0 RESULTS OF PHASE II ESA.......................................................................................45 5.1 FIELD CONDITIONS.........................................................................................45 5.1.1 SOIL.......................................................................................................45 5.1.2 SEDIMENT.............................................................................................45 5.1.3 GROUNDWATER..................................................................................46 5.2 SELECTION OF APPLICABLE GUIDELINES/STANDARDS .............................47 5.2.1 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER GUIDELINES..........................................47 5.2.2 SEDIMENT GUIDELINES......................................................................49 5.3 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM RESULTS................................................................51 5.3.1 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS...............................................................51 5.3.2 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS.....................................................52 5.3.3 SOIL WASTE CHARACTERIZATION....................................................58 5.3.4 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS...........................................58 5.3.5 QA/QC RESULTS..................................................................................59 6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS.........................................................................................62 6.1 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER.............................................................................62 6.2 SEDIMENT........................................................................................................63 7.0 CONTAMINATED SITE SUMMARY.............................................................................65 8.0 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL.................................................................66 9.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................69 10.0 CLOSURE.....................................................................................................................71 11.0 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................72 PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 v FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 APEC Locations Figure 3 General Site Layout Figure 4 Soil Exceedances Figure 5A Sediment Exceedances - PHCs, PAHs, Metals, Nutrients Figure 513 Sediment Exceedances - Organochlorine Pesticides Figure 6 Groundwater Exceedances Figure 7 Interpreted Groundwater Flow Figure 8 Summary of Contaminated Sites Figure 9 Preliminary CSM Figure 10A Cross -Section A -A' Figure 10B Cross -Section B -B' TABLES Table 1 Summary Table of Areas of Potential Environmental Concern Table 2 Groundwater Monitoring Data Table 3 Purge Water Monitoring Data Table 4 Soil Analytical Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons Table 5 Soil Analytical Results - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Table 6 Soil Analytical Results - Metals and pH Table 7 Soil Analytical Results - Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs Table 8 Sediment Analytical Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons Table 9 Sediment Analytical Results - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Table 10 Sediment Analytical Results - Metals Table 11 Sediment Analytical Results - Inorganics, Nutrients, and pH Table 12 Sediment Analytical Results - Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs Table 13 Water Analytical Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons Table 14 Water Analytical Results - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Table 15 Water Analytical Results - Metals, Hardness, and pH Table 16 Water Analytical Results - Cadmium Table 17 Summary of Contaminated Sites 11:11.7t7_1»4:10W1 z r►i A I =fikl k IFTA 00911 PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 10I3118. El91I1� APPENDICES Appendix I Federal Property Documents Appendix II Site Photographs Appendix III Borehole Logs Appendix IV Well Records Appendix V Aerial Photographs Appendix VI Topographic Map Appendix VII Property Title Search Appendix VIII City Directory Search Appendix IX RMS Correspondence Appendix X EcoLog ERIS Report Appendix XI Government, Regulatory, and Other Documentation Appendix XII Wildlife Species at Risk Appendix XIII Laboratory Certificates of Analysis Appendix XIV Qualifications of the Assessors 11:11.7t7_1»41:1,11W 1 z r►i A 14-ki k IFTA 009 a PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 [x:1:11Klll� 1.0 INTRODUCTION Terrapex Environmental Ltd. (Terrapex) was retained by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) to conduct a Phase 1/11 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour (SCH) located in Port Burwell, Ontario. Port Burwell SCH is identified with the site number CSO4766, which encompasses most of the downstream portion of Big Otter Creek where the creek meets the north shore of Lake Erie, and a portion of Lake Erie in Port Burwell, Ontario. The Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory (FCSI) Federal Site Identifiers associated with CSO4766 are 00012785 and 00012786, and hereinafter they will be referenced as FCSI 00012785 and FSCI 00012786, respectively. The project was conducted to fulfill the requirements of the DFO Terms of Reference (TOR) Module Phase 1/ll Environmental Site Assessment (updated: May 2012) and also incorporates an updated geomatics property boundary provided by PWGSC. The work program documented herein was conducted in general accordance with the proposed scope of work presented in the Terrapex September 26, 2012 proposal, prepared in response to the PWGSC Statement of Work (SOW). Written authorization to proceed with the project was received from PWGSC on September 28, 2012. 1.1 OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Phase 1/II ESA were to: • identify, through the completion of the Phase I ESA component, actual and potential site contamination; • confirm the presence of, and characterize, the contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) at areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) identified in the Phase I ESA component, through the completion of a Phase II ESA Investigation; and, • prepare a conceptual site model. 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK Phase I ESA: The scope of work for the Phase I ESA component of this project included the following: • reviewing available historic and current environmental information pertaining to the subject site and surrounding area; • interviewing representatives of the current owner of the subject site and tenants of the on-site building; TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 • conducting a reconnaissance of the subject site and accessible surrounding properties for evidence of potential environmental concerns; • reviewing, evaluating, and interpreting the information obtained from the records review, interviews, and site reconnaissance; and, • preparing an update report to summarize the findings of the Phase I ESA component and confirm or revise the proposed workplan for the Phase II ESA (if required). Phase H ESA: The scope of work for the Phase II ESA component of this project included the following: • supervising a drilling subcontractor advancing three boreholes on the subject site using a track -mounted Geoprobe Model 7822DT (GM7822DT) multi-purpose drill rig equipped with a Dual Tube Sampling System; • collecting representative soil samples from each drilled borehole, and submitting selected samples for laboratory analysis of chemical parameters of concern, as well as physical properties; • supervising the drilling subcontractor installing a groundwater monitoring well into each of the three drilled boreholes; • conducting a well monitoring program of the three newly installed monitoring wells; • collecting representative groundwater samples from each of the three newly installed monitoring wells, and submitting the samples for laboratory analysis of chemical parameters of concern; • supervising a drilling subcontractor advancing three deep sediment cores within the water lot portion of the subject site using a Pionjar sampler; • collecting representative sediment samples from each core location, and submitting selected samples for laboratory analysis of chemical parameters of concern, as well as physical properties; • collecting sediment samples from six surficial sediment sampling locations, and submitting the samples for laboratory analysis of chemical parameters of concern; • interpreting the observations and findings from the field work, and evaluating the laboratory analytical results with the appropriate comparison criteria provided in the following: • CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (updated 2012), hereinafter referred to as CEQGs: • Chapter 4 - Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 2 of Aquatic Life (CWQG-PAL) for Freshwater (FW) provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table (http://st-ts.ccme.ca/); • Chapter 6 — Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; • Chapter 7 — Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; • Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines (FIGQGs) presented in the Environment Canada Guidance Document on Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Federal Contaminated Sites (November 2012); • Guidance Document: Framework for Addressing and Managing Aquatic Contaminated Sites Under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) (May 13, 2010); • MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); used to evaluate the laboratory analytical results of parameters for which the CCME documents do not provide guidelines or standards; • MOE Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); used to evaluate the laboratory analytical results of parameters for which the CCME CEQG does not provide sediment quality guidelines; • leachate quality criteria provided in Schedule 4 of Revised Regulation of Ontario (R.R.O.) 1990, Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), made under the Environmental Protection Act, Revised Statutes of Ontario (R.S.O.) 1990, c. E.19; • the definition of PCB materials provided in R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 362 (Waste Management — PCB's), made under the Environmental Protection Act; and, • preparing a report to detail the findings and results of the project. Terrapex subcontracted the services of other firms to complete specialized assignments for the project, as described below: • Private locating services were provided by On The Money Locates (OTM) of London, Ontario. • Borehole drilling and monitoring well installation services were provided by Strata Drilling Group (SDG) of Richmond Hill, Ontario. SDG is an Ontario Ministry of PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 3 the Environment (MOE) licensed well drilling contractor. • Laboratory analytical services were provided by Maxxam Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (Maxxam) of Mississauga, Ontario. The Maxxam laboratory is accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for each of the analyses it conducted as part of this work program. • Geotechnical services (grain size distribution analysis) were provided by Alston Associates Inc. (Alston) of Markham, Ontario. Alston is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Terrapex. • Soil cuttings and purge water management services were provided by Clarkway Construction Company Ltd. (Clarkway) of Brampton, Ontario. Clarkway is a MOE-licensed waste hauler which can provide vacuum trucks, soil bins, and drums for soil and groundwater disposal at a private waste disposal facility. • Watercraft services were provided by Mr. Ron Bradfield of Bradfields Marina of Port Burwell, Ontario. Mr. Bradfield is a licensed boat operator. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The Port Burwell SCH encompasses the downstream portion of Big Otter Creek where the creek meets Lake Erie, and a portion of Lake Erie in Port Burwell, Ontario. Refer to Figure 1 for the location of the Port Burwell SCH. Port Burwell in the early 1830s was a small fishing wharf, which through the years expanded as an access point to accommodate commercial fishing and shipments of industrial and commercial commodities (coal, potash, fuel oil, lumber, and shingles) via the Great Lakes in the early 1900s. Operating under the administration and control of DFO, the Port Burwell SCH is presently used as a recreational and commercial fishing access point. The Port Burwell SCH is comprised primarily of water lots, and includes part of the bed of Big Otter Creek, part of the bed of Lake Erie and some land not covered by water. The Directory of Federal Real Property (DFRP) administered by the Real Property and Material Policy Directorate of the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) maintains an inventory of, and property information for, federal real properties. The information presented in the DFRP listing for Port Burwell SCH, a copy of which is included in Appendix I, is summarized below: • The DFRP property number is 54022, with the following two reference plans listed: Parts 2, 6, and 7 on Plan 11 R-6760 and Part 1 on Plan 11 R-7468, which include land parcels and water lots; Parts 3, 4, and 5 on Plan 11 R-6760, which represent Federal Crown easements for anchorage along the harbour walls; and, Part 1 on Plan 11 R-6760, which a land parcel located east of the harbour. The DFRP listing noted that ownership of Part 1 of Plan 11 R-6760 by DFO had not yet been confirmed. As a result, this area was not investigated as part of the current Phase I and Phase II ESA activities at the request of PWGSC and DFO. Subsequent correspondence from PWGSC to Terrapex has confirmed that DFO does not own the land parcel described as part 1 of Plan 11 R-6760. • The custodian is DFO. • The property is Crown -owned for the listed use of transportation (marine). • There is one building present on Part 2; a Canadian Coast Guard automation building constructed in 1972 which has a floor area of 30 square meters (m2) and is currently vacant. The building had been previously classified as Contaminated Site 00013964, however, DFRP lists the building has been previously assessed and no further action is required. The Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory (FCSI) number for this building is CF 00271 and the DFRP Property Number is 85247. It was used for warehouse, workshop and storage. There are no other buildings present on the subject site. • The DFRP database lists Parts 2, 6, and 7 on Plan 11 R-6760 and Part 1 on Plan 11 R- 7468 occupy a total area of 78.27 hectares (ha). TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 5 • The coordinates for the property are latitude 42.639855 +/- 200 m and longitude -80.805650 +/- 200 m. • The property has two Contaminated Sites listed, designated in the FCSI as 00012785 and 00012786. FCSI 00012785 indicates that the sediment sampled 11 m east of the west wharf (east of Talisman aboveground storage tanks (ASTs)) is impacted with copper, manganese, and one type of pesticide. FCSI 00012786 indicates that sediment sampled 26 m west of the concrete pier (north corner) is impacted with one type of pesticide. The Departmental Internal Identifier number is CSO4766. The Contaminated Sites are associated with the water lots of the Port Burwell SCH property (see Figure 2). Note that DFO has advised that the DFRP database is in the process of being validated and that both Contaminated Sites have been identified as 'Open' with the listed management type as 'Assessment'. As a result, both FCSI 000112785 and FCSI 00012786 have been included in the current Phase 1/11 ESA study. • Five other suspected Contaminated Sites associated with this property, but not included in this Phase 1/11 ESA study, are listed on the DFRP inventory as follows: FCSI 00016589 (Sediment - 12 m West of Concrete Pier (North Corner); FCSI 00016590 (Surface Soil -East Beach Property); FCSI 00016591 (Sediment - vicinity of sewage plant); FCSI 00016592 (Sediment - west of Concrete & East Steel Dock); FCSI 00016593 (Sediment - North of East Steel Dock. The location of each contaminated site in relation to the subject site could not be confirmed on the DFRP Property website (www.tbs-sct.gc.ca). However, based on a review of previous investigations conducted at the site, all five Contaminated Sites are located on the subject site. Note that DFO has advised that the DFRP database is currently in the process of being validated and that the five Contaminated Sites have been identified as 'Closed' due to no contamination being found and are listed as'Other Management Type'. PWGSC provided a figure prepared by its Real Property Geomatics Services department entitled Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour (September 2012) which shows the entire 78.27 ha site including both the water lot portions and land portions of the Port Burwell SCH that is the subject of the current study. PWGSC also provided the plans of survey (Plan 11 R-6760 and Plan 11 R-7468) for the subject site prepared by Kim Husted Surveying Limited which detailed the site boundaries. Copies of these documents are included in Appendix I. Previous environmental investigations have been conducted at the Port Burwell SCH property, including: • Stantec Consulting Ltd., Assessment of Environmental Risks for Municipality of Bayham at Port Burwell (March, 2012); and, • MacViro Consultants Ltd., Enhanced Phase 1 Site Assessment, Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Site No. 4766, (March 2001), prepared for DFO. Summaries of the previous environmental reports are presented in Section 4.1.6. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 6 Based on the results of the previous environmental studies, the Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPCs) at the subject site are petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, inorganics, nutrients, pH, organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Refer to Figure 3 for the general site layout of the Port Burwell SCH at the time of the site inspection. Photographs of the subject site and the on-site structures are presented in Appendix 11. Additional information pertaining to the subject site gathered during the Phase I ESA site inspection is presented in Section 4.3. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 7 3.0 METHODOLOGY 3.1 PHASE I ESA WORK PROGRAM The Phase I ESA was conducted in general accordance with the principles set out in the Contaminated Sites Management Working Group (CSMWG) A Federal Approach to Contaminated Sites (November 1999), and the CSA Standard 2768-01 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (reaffirmed 2012). 3.1.1 RECORDS REVIEW The following sources of information were searched and/or reviewed as part of the records review: • four aerial photographs for the years 1945, 1959, 1966, and 1973, as well as a 2010 satellite image available from the Google Earth website, which show the area of the subject site; • the following maps which provide topographic and geological information for the area of the subject site: • Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN), Centre for Topographic Information, Sheet 40110; • Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) 1:1,000,000 scale map entitled Quaternary Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet, Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2556 (1991); • Barnett, P.J. 1983. Quarternary Geology of the Port Burwell Area, Southern Ontario Geological Survey. Map P 2624. Geological Series - Preliminary Map. Scale 1:50,000 (Geology 1982-1983); • Barnett, P.J. 1993. Quarternary Geology of the Long Point -Port Burwell Area, Ontario Geological Survey. Open File Report 5873, page 212 (figures 2 and 3); • Ecolog ERIS, Ontario Base Mapping (OBM), Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR); • city directories for the community of Port Burwell; • property title search information for the subject site; • two plans of survey for the subject site (Plan 11 R-6760 and Plan 11 R-7468), provided by PWGSC; • historic insurance documents for the subject site and surrounding areas available from the Risk Management Services (RMS) Historical Environmental Information Reporting System (HEIRSTM); PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 8 • federal, provincial, and private source database records for the subject site and immediately surrounding areas, available through EcoLog Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. (EcoLog ERIS) for a 300 metre (m) search radius using the subject site as the centroid; this includes information on coal gasification plant waste sites, industrial sites producing or using coal tar and related tars, historic and active waste disposal sites, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) storage sites, hazardous waste generators, and groundwater usage; • municipal/local archives or historical societies (if applicable); • regulatory file information and documentation regarding environmental concerns related to the subject site, and/or information pertaining to water bodies and areas of natural significance, available from: • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO); • Environment Canada; • Health Canada; • Ministry of the Environment (MOE); • MOE Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Office (MOE FOI); • Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR); • Long Point Region Conservation Authority (LPRCA); • Technical Standards & Safety Authority (TSSA) Fuels Safety Division; • The Municipality of Bayham; • available information provided on the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) Public Registry website, the Environment Canada Canadian Wildlife Service website, the Environment Canada Project Wildspace website, the DFO Aquatic SAR website, the Atlas of Breeding Birds of Ontario website, and the Ontario's Biodiversity: Species at Risk website available through the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) in partnership with the MNR; • survey information for the site; and, • previous environmental reports available for the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour. 3.1.2 INTERVIEW PROGRAM Government Agencies: Representatives of federal, provincial, and municipal government agencies were requested to provide any environmental information in their files related to the subject site, as well as any available information pertaining to water bodies and areas of natural significance, and/or were interviewed. Terrapex contacted the following individuals: PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 9 • Environment Canada; • Health Canada; • Mr. John McGlynn, Environmental Officer, MOE; • Ms. Liz Mico, FOI Office Clerk, MOE FOI; • Mr. Korey Walker, Planning Intern, MNR; • LPRCA; • Ms. Sarah Quibell, Public Information Services, TSSA Fuels Safety Division; and, • The Municipality of Bayham. Site Representatives: An interview with a representative of the current site tenant (DFO) was also conducted: • Mr. Mark Sanderman, Area Manager, Client Services, Small Craft Harbours Branch, Central & Arctic Region, DFO. Additional Interviews: An Interview with a long time Port Burwell resident with knowledge of the site was also conducted: • Mr. Ron Bradfield, Owner/Operator of Bradfields Marina, Port Burwell. 3.1.3 SITE INSPECTION The inspection of the subject site was conducted by Mr. Raymond Ayuen of Terrapex on November 19, 2012. The site walkover inspection was conducted to confirm and supplement the information obtained during the records review and ensure familiarity with the current conditions of the subject site. Particular attention was paid during the site walkover to evaluate whether there had been any changes to the subject site since the completion of the previous environmental studies. Health and Safety Plan: A site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) was prepared by Terrapex prior to commencing the field work for the Phase I ESA site inspection. This HASP was submitted electronically to the PWGSC Project Manager on November 15, 2012, and following acceptance, one copy of the HASP remained with the field crew at the subject site for the duration of the Phase I ESA field activities (as well the subsequent Phase II ESA field activities). The project team member that conducted the Phase I ESA site inspection read and signed the HASP before commencing work at the subject site. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 10 Exterior Site Inspection: The inspection of the exterior property conducted at the subject site included the tasks described below: • Performing a general site reconnaissance to identify, describe, and document the condition of physical site characteristics and any structures, as well as the presence/absence of ASTs and underground storage tanks (USTs), vent pipes, groundwater monitoring wells, treatment systems, sheens on standing water, unusual odours, filled areas, disturbed soil, stained or discoloured ground surfaces, obvious contamination, and potential environmental liabilities. • Identifying, to the extent practical, the nature and extent of ground staining or possible contamination, and performing a general survey of vegetation for stress or kill zones. • Documenting the nature of operations and activities carried out at the subject site and the types of materials used on site. • Surveying housekeeping practices to identify the presence/absence of wastes (solid waste, discarded batteries, chemical drums, excess fill, etc.). • Determining the source of potable water supply for the subject property, if any. • Observing and documenting the current conditions of surrounding properties. Interior Inspection: Based on information from Mr. Sandeman (DFO) that the former Coast Guard automation building (located west of the parking lot of the west pier parcel of the subject site) has been previously assessed, an interior inspection of the building was not conducted. As specified in the PWGSC SOW, confirmatory analysis of potential asbestos -containing materials (ACM), lead-based contamination, mercury -containing devices, PCB materials, urea formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI), and mould was beyond the scope of the current study. Therefore, representative bulk samples of building materials suspected to contain these substances were not collected during the site reconnaissance. During the site inspection, Terrapex photographed the site layout, structures, and any specific environmental concerns identified on the subject site. Refer to Appendix II for selected photographs taken during the Phase I ESA field activities. 3.1.4 EVALUATION AND REPORTING Based on the preliminary review, evaluation, and interpretation of the information obtained from the Phase I ESA records review (documents received to date), interviews, and site reconnaissance, a total of three APECs were identified associated with the subject site. Terrapex incorporated the findings of the Phase I ESA component into the proposed workplan for the Phase I I ESA. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 11 3.1.5 LIMITATIONS Most areas of the subject site were accessible and observed during the site inspection with one exception: the former Coast Guard automation building located west of the parking lot of the west pier parcel of the subject site. Cursory observations of the surrounding properties within the study area made during the site reconnaissance were limited to areas visible from the subject site or from publicly accessible areas and vantage points. It should be noted that although Terrapex has attempted to verify information wherever possible, except where explicitly noted, we have relied upon the accuracy of the information collected during the records review and interview components. Generally limited historical information was available regarding former operations at the subject site, other than personal recollection. 3.2 PHASE II ESA WORK PROGRAM The Phase II ESA work Program was conducted in general accordance with the principles set out in the CSMWG A Federal Approach to Contaminated Sites (November 1999), and the CSA Standard Z769-00 Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment (reaffirmed 2008). Following receipt of approval from PWGSC to proceed, Terrapex conducted the on-site field components of the Phase II ESA Program on November 20, 2012 and December 5 and 6, 2012. Refer to Appendix II for selected photographs taken during the Phase II ESA field activities. 3.2.1 PREPARATION Health and Safety Plan: The HASP prepared by Terrapex (prior to commencing the Phase I ESA site inspection) also remained with the field crew at the subject site for the duration of the Phase II ESA field activities. The project team members and subcontractors that conducted the field activities read and signed the HASP before commencing work at the subject site. Site Walkover: Mr. Ayuen conducted the site walkover inspection on November 19, 2012. This inspection was conducted to confirm the current site conditions, indentify any changes from previously reported site conditions, and to mark the proposed sampling locations. Service Clearances: Prior to conducting intrusive field work, Terrapex contacted the appropriate public agencies to identify the locations of buried services at and near the subject site. Terrapex also retained OTM, a private underground utility locating contractor, to provide clearances with respect to buried services in the sampling locations. Underground services were identified on the subject site, within the vicinity of MW 102. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 12 3.2.2 SOIL 3.2.2.1 BOREHOLE DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING Drilled Boreholes: Terrapex supervised the drilling of three boreholes (MW101 to MW103) on November 20, 2012. Boreholes were advanced across the subject site, to a depth of approximately 7.6 m below grade (m bg), by SDG using a track -mounted GM7822 multi- purpose drill rig equipped with a dual -tube sampling system. The locations of the drilled boreholes were selected to assess near -surface and subsurface conditions at APEC 1 on the subject site, as well as to investigate potential impacts to the site from off-site current and historical activities associated with APEC 2, identified during the Phase I ESA component (refer to Section 4.4 and to Table 1). Consideration was also given to the locations of buried and overhead services present within the study area. One borehole (MW102) was located within 10 m of a surface water body. The drilled borehole sampling locations are shown on Figure 3. Photographs of the drilling activities are included in Appendix 11. Soil Sampling: Soil samples were collected in general accordance with the sampling and preservation protocols provided in the CCME Guidance Manual on Sampling, Analysis, and Data Management for Contaminated Sites, Volumes / and 11 (December 1993), the Environment Canada -Ontario Region Technical Assistance Bulletin (TAB) for federal facilities operating in Ontario entitled TAB #4 Sampling & Analysis of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil, and the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE) Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario (December 1996). As specified in the PWGSC SOW, federal guidelines and standards are applicable to the subject site, and evaluation of the extent of any soil contamination at the subject site is based on federal criteria. During drilling on November 20, 2012, a dual -tube sampler was advanced into the subsurface to facilitate the collection of relatively undisturbed soil samples (from the inner probe rod which was lined with clear, disposable polyvinyl chloride [PVC] sample liners). Terrapex collected soil samples from the sample liners of the dual -tube sampler at depth intervals of approximately 1.5 m, and immediately logged the geologic properties of each sample. In addition, each soil sample was examined for visual and/or olfactory evidence of contamination, and combustible soil vapour (CSV) concentrations were measured in the headspace of each sampling bag with a GastechtorTM Model 1238ME Hydrocarbon Surveyor (Gastechtor) calibrated to n -hexane and operated in the methane elimination mode, and with a RAE Systems ppb RAE 3000 Photoionization Detector (PID) calibrated to isobutylene. Soil samples which were screened for vapours were not submitted for laboratory analysis (a separate split sample of the soil was collected and stored for possible laboratory analysis). Borehole logs describing the stratigraphy encountered TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 13 and documenting the measured CSV concentrations are included in Appendix III. To mitigate cross -contamination between soil samples, new sample liners were used for each soil sample. Terrapex personnel wore fresh nitrile gloves for the handling of each soil sample. 3.2.2.2 SOIL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Soil samples were selected for laboratory analysis from the drilled boreholes based on CSV measurements and visual indications of fill material, as well as to characterize near -surface and subsurface conditions. A total of 11 soil samples (MW101-1A, MW101-113, MW101-1C, MW101-3, MW102-1A, MW 102-1 B, MW 102-1 C, MW 102-4, MW 103-1A, MW 103-1 B, and, MW 103-4) were selected and submitted for laboratory analysis. Soil samples MW 101-6, MW 102-1 E, MW 102-1 F, and MW 102-1 D were field duplicates of soil samples MW 101-3, MW 102-1 B, MW 102-1 C, and MW 102-1 A, respectively. These soil samples were collected in pre - cleaned, glass containers provided by the laboratory, packed in coolers with ice packs, and shipped directly to the Maxxam laboratory, accompanied by completed chain -of - custody forms. The soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of chemical parameters of concern, as follows: • three soil samples (MW101-3, MW102-4, and MW103-4) and a field duplicate of sample MW101-3 (identified as MW101-6) were submitted for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and petroleum hydrocarbon parameters (PHCs); • three soil samples (MW 101-1 B, MW 102-1 B, and MW 103-1 B) and a field duplicate of sample MW102-113 (identified as MW102-1E) were submitted for analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); • three soil samples (MW 101-1 C, MW 102-1 C, and MW 103-1 B) and afield duplicate of sample MW 102-1 C (identified as MW 102-1 F) were submitted for analysis of metals and pH; and, • three soil samples (MW101-1A, MW102-1A, and MW103-1A) and a field duplicate of sample MW102-1A (identified as MW102-1D) were submitted for analysis of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In addition to chemical parameters of concern, three soil samples (MW101-3, MW102-3, and MW103-2) were submitted for grain size distribution analysis. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 14 3.2.3 SEDIMENT 3.2.3.1 SEDIMENT SAMPLING Sediment Sampling: Sediment samples were collected in general accordance with the sampling and preservation protocols provided in the DFO Module Phase 1/ll Environmental Site Assessment (updated May 2012), as well as the MOE Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008). As specified in the PWGSC SOW, the Guidance Document: Framework for Addressing and Managing Aquatic Contaminated Sites Under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) (May 13, 2010) was utilized in evaluating the findings of the sediment sampling program. On December 5 and 6, 2012, SDG advanced three sediment cores (SED1, SED2, and SED3) to a depth of 7.5 m below water surface (approximately 4 to 4.5 m into the sediment) using a Pionjar soil sampling unit, equipped with split- spoon samplers set up on a raft in Big Otter Creek. The location of the sediment cores were selected to assess the surficial and subsurface sediment conditions at the previously identified at Contaminated Sites FCSI 00012785 and FCSI 00012786 within APEC 1, as well as to investigate potential impacts to the site from off-site historical and current activities associated with APEC 2 and APEC 3, as identified during the Phase I ESA component (refer to Section 4.4 and to Table 1). In addition, the assessment of sediment conditions at depth would allow for the future development of sediment dredging and disposal options for the harbour. The sediment core sampling locations are shown on Figure 3. Photographs of the sediment sampling activities are included in Appendix 11. During sampling, a split -spoon sampler was advanced into the subsurface to facilitate the collection of relatively undisturbed sediment samples. Terrapex collected sediment samples from the split -spoon at depth intervals of approximately 1.5 m, and immediately logged the geologic properties of each sample. Graphical logs describing the stratigraphy encountered and documenting the measured CSV concentrations are included in Appendix III. To mitigate cross -contamination between sediment samples collected from the Pionjar, the split spoons were washed with a solution of Alconox detergent and water and then rinsed with distilled water prior to the collection of each split -spoon. On December 6, 2012, Terrapex collected surficial sediment samples (SED4 to SED 9) at six locations (three as background sampling locations). The locations of the sediment samples were selected to assess surficial sediment conditions at APEC 1, to investigate potential impacts to the site from off-site current and historical activities associated with APEC 2 and APEC 3, identified during the Phase I ESA component (refer to Section 4.4 and to Table 1), and to provide background sediment conditions at the site. The sampler TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 15 was lowered three times at each sample location to collect a composite sediment sample from the three sub -samples. The representative grab samples were collected from the upper 5 centimeters (cm) to 10 cm of surficial sediments by Terrapex personnel using an Eckman Dredge (Dredge) sampler, which was deployed with rope from a watercraft operated by Mr. Ron Bradfield. Upon retrieval, the supernatant was decanted, and the composite sample was transferred to laboratory supplied jars. The surficial sediment sampling locations are shown on Figure 3. In addition, each sediment sample was examined for visual and/or olfactory evidence of contamination, and combustible vapour (CV) concentrations were measured in the headspace of each sampling bag with a Gastechtor calibrated to n -hexane and operated in the methane elimination mode, and with a PID calibrated to isobutylene. Sediment samples which were screened for vapours were not submitted for laboratory analysis (a separate split sample of the soil was collected and stored for possible laboratory analysis). To mitigate cross -contamination between sediment samples collected with the Dredge sampler, the unit was washed with a solution of Alconox detergent and water and then rinsed with distilled water prior to the collection of each sample. Terrapex personnel wore fresh nitrile gloves for the handling of each sediment sample. 3.2.3.2 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Sediment samples were selected for laboratory analysis to characterize near -surface and subsurface conditions from the three sediment core sampling locations (SED1 to SED3), which consisted of one surficial sediment sample and one deep core sediment sample each, and three surficial sampling locations (SED4-1, SED6-1, and SED9-1). In addition, three surficial sampling locations (SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1) were selected to provide background surficial sediment conditions at the site. A total of nine sediment samples (SED1-1, SED1-3, SED2-1, SED2-3, SED3-1, SED3-2, SED4-1, SED6-1, and SED9-1) were selected and submitted for laboratory analysis. Sediment sample SED10-1 was a field duplicate of sediment sample SED1-1. Sediment samples SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1 were selected as background (reference) samples. These sediment samples were collected in pre -cleaned, glass containers provided by the laboratory, packed in coolers with ice packs, and shipped directly to the Maxxam laboratory, accompanied by completed chain -of -custody forms. The sediment samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of chemical parameters of concern, as follows: • twelve samples (SED1-1, SED1-3, SED2-1, SED2-3, SED3-1, SED3-2, SED4-1, SED5-1, SED6-1, SED7-1, SED8-1 and SED9-1) and a field duplicate of sample TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 16 SED1-1 (identified as SED10-1) were submitted for analysis of BTEX, PHCs, PAHs, metals, inorganics, nutrients, pH, and, • nine samples (SED1-1, SED1-3, SED2-1, SED2-3, SED3-1, SED3-2, SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1) and a field duplicate of sample SED1-1 (identified as SED10-1) were submitted for analysis of OCPs and PCBs. In addition to chemical parameters of concern, three sediment samples (SED2-2, SED6-1, and SED9-1) were submitted for grain size distribution analysis. 3.2.4 GROUNDWATER 3.2.4.1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION Three monitoring wells (MW101 to MW103), constructed of 50 millimetre (mm) diameter PVC well pipe and screen, were installed into the three drilled boreholes. The annulus of each well was backfilled with washed silica sand to a depth of approximately 0.3 m above the screened interval, and a bentonite seal was placed above the sand pack in each well to prevent infiltration of surface water. Protective casings were installed flush to the ground surface on each well, locked, and cemented in place. The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 3. Monitoring well construction details are provided in the borehole logs included in Appendix III, and copies of the well records completed by SDG are included in Appendix IV. 3.2.4.2 WELL MONITORING Terrapex conducted a well monitoring program on December 5, 2012, fifteen days after the completion of the drilling activities. All three of the newly installed monitoring wells were included in the well monitoring program. Immediately upon removal of the well standpipe cap, organic vapour concentrations within the headspace of each monitoring well were measured with a Gastechtor and with a PID. Following this, the depth to water was measured (from the top of the well standpipe) in each well with a Heron Instruments Inc. (Heron) H.OIL interface meter. The presence and apparent thickness of any light non -aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) encountered on the surface of the groundwater in the monitoring wells, as well as of any dense non -aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), was also assessed using the interface meter and a bailer (as required). To mitigate cross -contamination between monitoring wells, the interface meter was washed with a solution of Alconox detergent and water and then rinsed with distilled water prior to use in each well. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 17 3.2.4.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Terrapex conducted a groundwater sampling program on December 5, 2012, fifteen days after the completion of the drilling activities. All three of the newly installed monitoring wells were included in the groundwater sampling program. Groundwater samples were collected in general accordance with the sampling and preservation protocols provided in the CCME 1993 Guidance Manual, the Environment Canada -Ontario Region TAB #5 Sampling & Analysis of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater, and the MOEE 1996 Guidance Document. In addition, low flow sampling was conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Low Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground -Water Sampling Procedures (April 1996). During the sampling of the monitoring wells, the temperature, conductivity, pH, redox potential, and dissolved oxygen of the purge water from each well was measured with a YSI 556 MPS (Multiprobe System). The minimal amount of purge water generated during the sampling of the three monitoring wells was containerized and subsequently removed by Clarkway for disposal at a licensed disposal facility. Four sets of groundwater samples were collected, including one representative set from each of the three monitoring wells (MW101 to MW103), and a field duplicate of groundwater sample MW103 (identified as MW104). In addition, during the collection of groundwater samples from monitoring well MW103, Terrapex prepared a field blank (FIELD BLANK) from analyte -free water supplied by the laboratory. The groundwater samples were collected directly into pre -cleaned containers provided by the laboratory, appropriate for the type of analysis to be conducted. Groundwater samples to be analyzed for metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP -MS) were field -filtered through dedicated Waterra FHT -45 In-line Disposable 0.45 Micron Filters. Terrapex personnel wore fresh nitrile gloves for the handling of each set of groundwater samples. These samples were packed in coolers with ice, and shipped directly to the Maxxam laboratory, accompanied by completed chain -of -custody forms. In addition, one trip blank (TRIP BLANK) prepared by the laboratory and transported to the site was shipped back with the field samples to the laboratory, without having been exposed during the groundwater sampling activities conducted on site. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 18 3.2.4.4 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Groundwater Samples: The groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of chemical parameters of concern. All four sets of groundwater samples (MW101 to MW103 and field duplicate MW104) were submitted for analysis of BTEX, PHCs, PAHs, metals, hardness and pH. Field Blanks and Trip Blanks: In addition to the groundwater samples, the field blank (FIELD BLANK) and the trip blank (TRIP BLANK) were submitted for laboratory analysis of BTEX and PHCs F1 to F4 for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) purposes. 3.2.5 SURVEY AND GPS On December 5, 2012, Terrapex surveyed the locations and elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells, structures, and features of interest on the subject site with a Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc. (Topcon) GTS -233W Total Station surveying instrument. The survey was conducted relative to a temporary benchmark (TBM) established on the property. A nail positioned at 0.773 m above grade on the east side of a hydro -pole located on the east side of Chatham Road was utilized as the TBM, and assigned an arbitrary elevation of 100.000 m. In addition, the sampling locations at the subject site were also marked with a Topcon® GRS-1 hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit. As required, GPS coordinates were referenced to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 19 4.0 RESULTS OF PHASE I ESA 4.1 RECORDS REVIEW 4.1.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Terrapex reviewed aerial photographs for the years 1945, 1959, 1966, and 1973, as well as a satellite image available from the Google Earth website for the year 2010. Copies of the aerial photographs and the satellite image are included in Appendix V. The relevant features identified in the aerial photographs and satellite image are summarized in the following sections. 1945 Aerial Photograph: No structures are present on the subject site in this photograph. Stockpiles of coal are visible on the western and eastern parcels of land on both sides of Big Otter Creek. The Canadian Pacific Railway tracks, occupied by railcars and the locomotive turntable roundhouse is evident on the east shoreline, west of Robinson Street, The areas of the Port Burwell Provincial Park to the west of the site appears to be generally undeveloped. The areas to the east of Robinson Street show development with structures. All other surrounding land areas appear to be undeveloped or used for agricultural activities (farming). 1959 Aerial Photograph: In this photograph, the 2,700,000-L capacity bulk fuel AST is now present west of the subject site and near the end of Chatham Street. The CPR railway infrastructure is still evident on the east side of Big Otter Creek. Stockpiles of coal are still evident on both sides of Big Otter Creek. The west shoreline of the Port Burwell SCH south of the turning basin has been widened. Development of the now existing Bradfields Marina location on the west side of Big Otter Creek, north of the subject site is evident. All other land areas surrounding the subject site appear to have increased development with structures. 1966 Aerial Photograph: This image is similar to the 1959 photograph for the general area of the subject site. Stockpiles of coal on both sides of Big Otter Creek the CPR railway infrastructure, and the bulk fuel AST west of the subject site are still evident. All other land areas surrounding the subject site appear to have increased development with structures. 1973 Aerial Photograph: This image is similar to the 1966 photograph for the general area of the subject site. Stockpiles of coal, the CPR railway infrastructure, and the large capacity bulk fuel storage on the west parcel of land are no longer present. All other land areas surrounding the subject site appear to have increased development with structures. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 20 2010 Satellite Image: This image is similar to the 1973 photograph for the general area of the subject site. The land areas on both sides of Big Otter Creek appear covered by grass and vegetation. The west portion of the turning basin has been infilled. The Water Pollution Control Plant at the southern end of Chatham Street and the two Talisman ASTs on the Port Burwell Harbour facility on the west side of Big Otter Creek are now evident. The north shoreline of Lake Erie, east of the east concrete pier appears to have been reclaimed further south. Pitt Street now extends west of Robinson Street to an access roadway which runs along the east shoreline of the Port Burwell SCH. The concrete footprint of the former CPR turntable roundhouse structure is evident. All other land areas surrounding the subject site appear to have increased development with structures. It should be noted that identification of more specific features at the subject site and surrounding properties was precluded by the scale and/or resolution on some of the aerial photographs. Based on the review of the aerial photographs and satellite image described above, it appears that the subject site began to undergo development after 1945. The historical use of the property for stockpiling and shipping of bulk materials (coal and potash) by boat, truck and railway, as well as the bulk storage and distribution of fuel oil adjacent to the site, and the current use of the Port Burwell SCH for marine transportation purposes represent potential environmental concerns. Similarly, the continuing use of surrounding properties for the production, collection, handling, and/or storage of regulated wastes (sewage treatment plant and gasoline AST (Bradfields Marina)) in close proximity to the subject site, represents a potential environmental concern. 4.1.2 PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC RECORDS Topographic Mapping: The NRCAN 1:50,000 scale NTS map (Centre for Topographic Information, Sheet 40110) provided by Ecolog ERIS, provides details on the area of Port Burwell, Ontario. There are no structures shown on site. The site encompasses the most downstream portion of Big Otter Creek where the creek meets the north shore of Lake Erie, and a portion of Lake Erie. The land portion of the subject site is located at an elevation of approximately 180 m above mean sea level (AMSL). The regional topography increases in elevation to the north away from the shoreline of Lake Erie. A copy of the relevant section of the NTS map is included in Appendix VI. Based on topography, the general direction of groundwater flow is assumed to be towards Big Otter Creek, while groundwater flow is likely to the south, toward Lake Erie, at the southern portions of the site. However, it should be noted that shallow groundwater flow can be locally influenced by topography, variable stratigraphy, underground trenches and conduits generally associated with buried utilities, and/or subsurface structures. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 21 Regional Physiography: As described in Quaternary Geology of the Long Point — Port Burwell Area, Ontario Geological Survey, Report 298 (dated 1998), the subject site lies toward the western end of the physiographic region known as the Norfolk Sand Plain. This physiographic region is described as having continuous abandoned shorecliffs due to the advancement and retreat of ancestral lakes during repeated glaciations. Some sand dunes are present in the area with heights ranging from 1 to 10 m. This area is also home to small areas of till and glaciolacustrine silts and clays, which generally correspond to the ends of moraines and creek beds as well as along the Lake Erie basin. Information provided on the accompanying MNR 1:50,000 scale Map 2624 indicates that the subject site is located on fill and modern Lake Erie beach deposits consisting of sand and gravel, or sand. Quaternary Geology: Based on information provided on the MNDM 1:1,000,000 scale Map 2556, the subject site is located in an area of glaciolacustrine deposits: silt and clay, minor sand and quiet water and basin deposits. Bedrock Geology: Based on information provided on the MNDM 1:1,000,000 scale Map 2554, the bedrock in the vicinity of the subject site is described as being of the Middle Devonian Era, specifically the Dundee Formation which consists of limestone, dolostone, and shale. 4.1.3 PROPERTY USE RECORDS As previously noted, the Port Burwell SHC is located along the southern portion of the Big Otter Creek where the creek meets Lake Erie, and a portion of Lake Erie in Port Burwell, Ontario. However, there is no municipal address specific to the Port Burwell SCH. Therefore, property use records which required a municipal address were obtained only for the legal description of the subject site. Property Title Search: Terrapex requested a property title search, through EcoLog ERIS, for the subject site based on the legal description provided by PWGSC on Plan 11 R-6760 and Plan 11 R-7468, which include the land parcels and water lots. A copy of the property title search report is included in Appendix VII. The Port Burwell SCH is legally described as; LT 1 E/S ERIEUS ST, 2 E/S ERIEUS ST, 3 E/S ERIEUS ST, 1 W/S STRACHAN ST, 2 W/S STRACHAN ST, 3 W/S STRACHAN ST, 4 W/S STRACHAN ST, 5 E/S STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; UNNUMBERED BLK E OF ERIEUS ST W OF STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; UNNUMBERED BILK E OF STRACHAN ST S OF HAGERMAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; SLOPE OF BANK AND BEACH PL 197 BAYHAM; LT 6 E/S GEORGE ST, 7 E/S GEORGE ST, 8 W/S GEORGE ST, 9 W/S GEORGE ST PL 197 BAYHAM; PT LT 2 W/S ERIEUS ST, 3 W/S ERIEUS ST, 4 E/S ERIEUS ST, 5 E/S ERIEUS ST, 5 W/S STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; PT HAGERMAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; PT RDAL FOR ERIEUS ST PL 12 BAYHAM; RDAL TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 22 FOR STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; PT LT 1 S/S PITT ST, 5 E/S GEORGE ST, 10 W/S GEORGE ST, 15 PL 197 BAYHAM; PT GEORGE ST PL 197 BAYHAM; PT BED OF LAKE ERIE BAYHAM PT 1& 2 11R5137; BAYHAM. The associated Property Identification Number (PIN) is 35324-0223 (R). The current registered owner of the property (including both the land parcels and water lots) is listed in the property title search report as The Corporation of the Village of Port Burwell, which has owned the subject site since 1977, when ownership was transferred from Ms. Susan Stock. The property was first registered in 1967 by a Mr. David J.B. Stock and a Mr. Robert Klein. Between the years 1967 and 1977, ownership was transferred between the following individuals: Mr. Irwin Francis Esseltine and Mrs. Leta Pearl Esseltine, Mr. Anthony F. Murphy, Mr. David and Susan Stock, Tiiu Klein, Anthony F. Murphy, Mary E. Murphy. However, based on the DFRP information provided by PWGSC, the property owner of the subject site is Her Majesty the Queen, Right of Canada, DFO. The DFRP information also indicates that the Land Registry Office has no record of the Federal Crown's ownership and therefore no Land Registry Office Property Identification Number (PIN) was created for the site. Plan of Survey: As previously noted, PWGSC provided the plans of survey for the subject site prepared by Kim Husted Surveying Limited (Plan 11 R-6760 and Plan 11 R-7468). Parts 3, 4, and 5 on Plan 11 R-6760 represent easements in favour of the Federal Crown for the anchorage of walls. The Land Registry Office records do not reflect these easements and therefore, while they may exist on the ground, there is no registered federal interest in these properties. A copy of the plans of survey are included in Appendix I. City Directories: Terrapex ordered city directory information from EcoLog ERIS for the subject site, based on the legal description of the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour. The report received from EcoLog ERIS provides no city directory information. Port Burwell is not listed in the city directory archives. A copy of the EcoLog ERIS City Directory Search report is included in Appendix VIII. HEIRSTm Documents: Terrapex requested a HEIRSTm Record Search (through EcoLog ERIS) for the subject site, based on the legal site description of the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour. The response received from RMS dated February 7, 2013 indicated that they did not locate any Property Underwriters' Reports or Property Underwriters' Plans for the subject site, but did locate Fire Insurance Plans (FIPs) of surrounding properties for the year 1896, which did not include the subject site. Copies of the Risk Management Service (RMS) correspondence are included in Appendix IX. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 23 4.1.4 DATABASE RECORDS Terrapex ordered a Custom Report from EcoLog ERIS for any records pertaining to the subject site or surrounding properties within 300 m. A total of 50 databases were searched for environmental source information and records. The report received from EcoLog ERIS dated February 11, 2013 includes a detailed report which presents information for the records found, a site diagram which plots the locations of the sites for which records were found (provided sufficient address information was available), as well as an appendix which contains descriptions of the databases EcoLog ERIS searched. A copy of the EcoLog ERIS Report is included in Appendix X. The EcoLog ERIS search identified records on 14 of the 50 databases. The records found for the subject site and/or the surrounding properties are summarized, by database, in the following sections. Borehole (BORE): Seven records were found on this database, pertaining to surrounding properties. The seven records document seven decommissioned boreholes located at the Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek. Certificates of Approval (CA): Eleven records were found on this database, pertaining to surrounding properties. Map keys were not provided on the EcoLog ERIS site diagram for five of the records (certificates of approval for municipal sewage or municipal water), therefore the proximity of the records to the subject site are not known. The six records for which location information was provided are summarized below: • The Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham (1 Chatham Street): four records document certificates of approvals for municipal sewage for the years 2004, 2005, and 2009. • Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources (9 Wilson Lane): One record documents a certificate of approval for municipal sewage for the year 2010. • Port Burwell village -Victoria Street (Pitt Street Row/Erieus Street) One record documents a certificate of approval for municipal sewage for the year 1991. Compliance and Convictions (CONK: One record was found on this database, pertaining to a surrounding property. This record documents that on November 10, 2000, the Ontario Clean Water Agency was fined $10,000 for discharge of sodium hypochlorite solution into or in the Chalmers drain that might have impaired the quality of the water. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 24 Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA): Two records were found on this database, pertaining to surrounding properties. One record documents that municipal and private sewage has been approved on January 13, 2012 for 9 Wilson Lane. The second record documents that a waste management system has been approved for 31 Erieus Street. ERIS Historical Searches (EHS): Three records were found on this database pertaining to surrounding properties. The three records pertaining to surrounding properties are summarized below: • 16 Wellington Street: A complete report dated February 11, 2000 with a search radius of 0.40 km. • 36 Robinson Street: A complete report dated January 18, 2007 with a search radius of 0.25 km. • Unknown address: A site report dated September 13, 2010 with a search radius of 0.25 km. List of TSSA Expired Facilities (EXP): Three records were found on this database, pertaining to surrounding properties. Two records document the FS Liquid Fuel Tank on the Big Otter Marina & Campgrounds property (5 Bridge Street) and identify the site licenses as expired. The third record documents the Leeds Transit Sales Ltd FS Propane Refill Centre - Cylinder Facility, located on Lot 13, Concession 1, Elgin County and identify the site license as expired. Contaminated Sites on Federal Land (FCS): Ten records were found on this database, three pertaining to the subject site and seven pertaining to surrounding properties. All ten records are located in the Elgin -Middlesex -London Electoral District and reported for DFO. Based on the information provided by PWGSC, FCS -2 and FC -3 pertain to the subject site and are included in the current study of the subject site. Terrapex was not able to confirm exact locations of records for FSC -4 to FCS -8 relative to the subject site on the DFRP Property website (www.tbs-sct.gc.ca). However, based on the information from the MacViro March 2001 report (refer to section 4.1.6 for the report summary), FSC -4 to FCS -8 are located on the subject site. The ten records pertaining to the subject site are summarized below: • FCS -1: Contaminated Site ID — 00013964, Departmental Identifier — CF 00271, Property No. 85247. No other information provided. • FCS -2 (MacViro sample ID SED1-2): Contaminated Site ID — 00012785, Departmental Identifier — CS 04766, Property No. 50422. The site name is Sediment - East of Talismen ASTs. The contaminants listed are: PHCs, PAHs, metals, PCBs, and polychlorinated dibenz-p-dioxin/dibenzofuran (PCDD/Fs). TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 25 • FCS -3 (MacViro sample ID SED1-3): Contaminated Site ID — 00012786, Departmental Identifier — CS 04766, Property No. 50422. The site name is Sediment - 26 m West of Concrete Pier (North Corner). The contaminants listed are: PHCs, PAHs, metals, PCBs, and PCDD/Fs. • FCS -4 (MacViro sample ID SED1-4): Contaminated Site ID — 00016589, Departmental Identifier — CF 04766, Property No. 54022. The site name is Sediment - 12 m West of Concrete Pier (North Corner). The contaminants listed are: PHCs, PAHs, metals, PCBs, and other physical/chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.). • FCS -5 (MacViro sample ID Soill-1) Contaminated Site ID — 00016590, Departmental Identifier — CS 04766, Property No. 54022. The site name is Surface Soil — East Beach Property. The contaminants listed are: metals. • FCS -6 (MacViro sample ID SED1-1): Contaminated Site ID — 00016591, Departmental Identifier — CS 04766, Property No. 54022 The site name is Sediment - Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant The contaminants listed are: PHCs, PAHs, metals, PCBs, and PCDD/Fs. • FCS -7 (MacViro sample ID SED1-5) Contaminated Site ID — 00016592, Departmental Identifier — CS 04766, Property No. 54022. The site name is Sediment - West of Concrete and East Steel dock (SW). The contaminants listed are: metals and other physical/chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.). • FCS -8 (MacViro sample ID SED1-6) Contaminated Site ID — 00016593, Departmental Identifier — CS 04766, Property No. 54022. The site name is Sediment - North of East Steel dock (SW). The contaminants listed are: metals and other physical/chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.). • FCS -9 Contaminated Site ID — 00013966, Departmental Identifier — CF 00273, Property No. 85266. No other information provided. • FCS -10 Contaminated Site ID — 00013968, Departmental Identifier — CF 00275, Property No. 85246. No other information provided. Fuel Storage Tank (FST): Seven records were found on this database, pertaining to two surrounding properties. Three records for Bradfields Marina (6 Hurley Lane) were listed, relating to one UST installed in 1996 (one 4,500-L capacity UST for gasoline). The remaining four records pertain to Big Otter Marina and Campgrounds (5 Bridge Street), and document two ASTs. One AST was installed in 1994 (one 2,270-L capacity AST for gasoline) and the second AST was installed in 2005 (one 2,200-L capacity AST for gasoline). Based on the location of the map key FST 1 to 3 on the EcoLog ERIS site diagram, the Bradfields Marina UST and Big Otter Marina and Campgrounds ASTs are up -gradient of PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 26 the subject site and adjacent to Big Otter Creek. The general direction of groundwater flow is assumed to be south toward Lake Erie, and therefore the one UST at Bradfields Marina could be considered up -gradient of the site. Based on the close proximity of the Bradfields Marina USTs, the handling and storage of petroleum products on this surrounding property represents a potential concern for the environmental quality of soil and groundwater at the subject site. Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary (GEN): Fourteen records were found on this database pertaining to surrounding properties, seven records with map keys and seven without map keys. The fourteen records documented various companies located within 300 m of the subject site, are summarized below: • The Ministry of Natural Resources Port Burwell Provincial Park (9 Wilson Lane): A generator of waste compressed gases for the years 2009 and 2012. The Park operated under generator number ON5461765. For the years 2003 to 2006, the Park operated under generator number ON8441477. • Port Burwell Provincial Park (off Highway 19): A generator of wastes including: acid waste -heavy metals, petroleum distillates, waste oils and lubricants, detergents/soaps, and light fuels. The Park operated under generator number ON0154900 for the year 1998 and ON0124127 for the years 1986 to 1990 and 1992 to 1997. • Port Burwell, Corporation of the Village (24 Pitt Street): A generator of waste oils & lubricants for the years 1988 to 1990 and 1992 to 1998. The Village operated under generator number ON 1066400. • CIBC (16 Wellington Street): A generator of light fuels for the years 2002 to 2004. This firm operated under generator number ON3049416. • The Ministry of the Environment (Port Burwell Water Pollution Control Plant - Chatham Street at Lake Erie): A generator of waste oils and lubricants for the years 1986 to 1990 and 1992 to 1998. The Ministry operated under generator number ON 199838. • Sportswood Printing/Canadian Sportsman Ltd. (25 Old Plank Road): A generator of paint/pigment/coating residues, petroleum distillates, photoprocessing wastes and graphic art wastes for the years 1992 to 2001. This firm operated under generator number ON1292800. The production, collection, handling, and/or storage of regulated wastes on surrounding properties in close proximity to the subject site, represent a potential environmental concern. The general direction of groundwater flow is assumed to be east and south toward the Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie on the west land side of Big Otter Creek and to the west TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 27 and south on the east side of Big Otter Creek. Based on their locations and/or the intervening distances to the subject site, surrounding properties (not immediately adjacent or proximate to the subject site) that are situated downgradient, cross -gradient, or significantly upgradient (greater than 125 m) of the subject site are considered unlikely to represent potential concerns for the environmental quality of soil and groundwater at the subject site. TSSA Incidents (INC): One record was found on this database, pertaining to a surrounding property. This record documents an explosion at 20 Brock Street and the status was pending RC validation. The record indicates that 20 Brock Street is located approximately 140 m east of the site. Given the distance of the incident from the site, it is unlikely to be a potential environmental concern to the site, National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES): One record was found on this database pertaining to a surrounding property. This record documents 13.00 L of PCB -contaminated oil leaking from a cooling system reported by Ontario Hydro. One hundred percent of the leaked material was recovered and disposed of at an unspecified landfill. No date of the incident is available. Non -Compliance Reports (NCPL): Four records were found on this database pertaining to surrounding properties without map keys. These records document two non-compliance reports in 2001 for the Port Burwell WPCP for a Certificate of Approval to discharge wastewater and two non-compliance reports in 1999 for the Port Burwell WWTP for a Certificate of Approval to discharge wastewater. National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES): One record was found on this database pertaining to a surrounding property without a map key. This record documents Ontario Hydro reporting 0.019 metric tonne of PCB -contaminated oil leaking from a cooling system. No other information was provided. Ontario Oil and Gas Well (OOGW): One record was found on this database, pertaining to a surrounding property. This record indicates that a natural gas well (identified as OOGW-1) was installed on March 26, 1918 to a depth of 426.7 m below grade (m bg). The well was drilled for exploratory purposes to discover a pool of oil or gas. The current status of the dry natural gas well is reported as unknown. Pesticide Register (PES): Four records were found on this database, pertaining to surrounding properties. These records document Port Burwell Home Hardware and Almond investments Inc. located at 39 Robinson Street, and A.G. Pasztor & Sons Farm Supply Ltd. as pesticide vendors. Private and Retail Fuel Storage Tanks (PRT): One record was found on this database without a map key pertaining to surrounding properties. This record documents a PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 28 1,000L retail tank was licensed to Leeds Transit Sales Ltd., located on Lot 13, Concession 1, Elgin County. No other information is available. This record is likely an error, as Leeds Transit Inc. is located in the Town of Elgin, north of Kingston, Ontario. Scott's Manufacturing Directory (SCT): One record was found on this database, pertaining to surrounding properties. This record documents the activities conducted by the Aramis Engraving & Signs Ltd, located on 34 Robertson Street. The business was established in 1980 and activities conducted on the property include: coating, engraving and allied services and sales of signs and advertising specialties. Ontario Spills (SPL): Twelve records were found on this database, one pertaining to the subject site and eleven pertaining to surrounding properties. Map keys were not provided on the EcoLog ERIS site diagram for seven of the records, therefore the proximity of the records to the subject site is not confirmed. The twelve records are summarized below: • One record pertaining to the subject site with a map key documents the Ontario Clean Water Agency reporting that the Union Street and Brock Street Pump Station had to bypass directly to the water course or Lake due to power outage. The environmental nature of impact to water was possible. • The Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham (1 Chatham Street): two records with map keys indicated possible environmental impacts to soil from raw unchlorinated sewage overflowing from tanks and lagoons on May 23, 2004 and a spill of digester foam on April 25, 2004. The waste treatment facility is located approximately 115 m west of the site and it is not known if any spill response/soil remediation activities were conducted. Given the age and nature of the spills, it is unlikely that the spills would be considered a potential environmental concern to the site. • One record with a map key documents 2 L of hydraulic oil leaking from either a hose and/or a pipe from a truck onto the ground due to equipment failure. No environmental impact to the ground was anticipated. The incident occurred on January 29, 1992 at the intersection of Strachan Avenue and Waterloo Street. The spill occurred approximately 340 m east of the site and it is not known if any spill response/soil remediation activities were conducted. Given the distance of the spill from the site, it would not be considered a potential environmental concern. • One record with a map key documents 30 L of furnace oil leaking from an above- ground tank during fuel delivery from a tank truck onto the ground on May 29, 1998. Environmental impact to the land was confirmed. The incident occurred at 41 Robinson Street, located approximately 130 m northeast of the site. Given the spill volume and distance to the site, it would not be considered an potential environmental concern. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 29 • Seven records of spills on various properties which did not have map keys are summarized below: • One records documents an oil spill of 0.5 L to Lake Erie southwest Port Burwell from a Pembina Exploration Drilling rig on June 20, 1995. This spill was reportedly cleaned up. No information was provided regarding the exact location of the spill or if any spill response/soil remediation activities were conducted. • One record documents a spill of tomato waste from a tank truck of unknown quantity onto the road on October 24, 1998. The incident occurred on County Roads 28, 42, 45 and Hwy 73 from St. Thomas to east of Port Burwell. No environmental impact to land was anticipated. • One record documents a spill of 10 L of mineral oil onto the ground from a transformer cooling system leak at the MOEE pumping station December 5, 1993. The incident occurred on County Roads 28, 42, 45 and Hwy 73 from St. Thomas to east of Port Burwell. Environmental impact to land was confirmed. • One record documents a spill at the Port Burwell Provincial Park on November 18, 1996. An unknown quantity of gasoline leaked from an underground tank due to corrosion on the tank. Environmental impacts to land and water were confirmed. No information was provided on the exact location of the spill, however, the Port Burwell Provincial Park is located approximately 180 m west of the site. • One record documents a spill of 360 L of jet fuel on Lake Erie near Port Burwell from a snowbird jet accident on June 22, 2001. Possible environmental impact to water was noted. • One record documents a spill of 60 mcf/d of natural gas (methane) from a 4" pipeline due to a leak on April 21, 2006 on Lake Erie, near Port Burwell. Possible environmental impact to surface water was confirmed. • One record documents a spill of 50 ppm of PCB from a transformer located at 21 Strachan Street, Port Burwell on April 28, 2011. The spill was contained and soil contamination was confirmed. Water Well Information System (WWIS): Fifteen records were found on this database, one record on the subject site and fourteen records on surrounding properties. The one record of a well on the subject site (WWIS-8) was a 2.5 m deep test hole rotary -drilled on May 25, 1960 in the East Beach Parcel. However, based on the legal survey provided by PWGSC, WWIS-8 is not located on the subject site, but one well record (WWIS-1) was a 7.92 m deep test hole rotary -drilled on May 27, 1960 and is located on the subject site. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 30 The remaining thirteen records of water wells on surrounding properties are summarized below: • One record documents a domestic water supply well cable -tooled drilled on December 20, 1984 to a depth of 7.01 m bg with a static water lever of 1.2 m bg. • One record documents a water well drilled by cable tool on May 17, 1960 to a depth of 4.3 m bg with a static water lever of 0.3 m bg, however, the well was listed as not used. • One record documents a water well rotary -drilled on May 11, 1960 to a depth of 5.2 m bg with a static water lever of 0.3 m bg, however, the well was listed as not used. • Eleven records document test holes rotary -drilled from May 3 to June 14, 1960 to depths ranging from 2.1 m to 64.6 m bg. Static water levels ranged from 0.3 m to 1.2 m bg. Shale bedrock was encountered at approximately 61.3 m bg. 4.1.5 GOVERNMENT AND REGULATORY DOCUMENTATION Terrapex contacted representatives of federal, provincial and municipal government agencies to request any environmental information in their files related to the subject site, and/or any available information pertaining to water bodies and areas of natural significance within the study area. Terrapex also conducted searches of available information provided on government websites. The responses received from the government agencies, as well as the additional information obtained through website searches, are summarized in the following sections. Fisheries and Oceans Canada: Please refer to Section 4.2.1 for the details of an interview via email with Mr. Mark Sandeman, Area Manager, Client Services, Small Craft Harbours Branch, Central & Arctic Region, DFO. Environment Canada: To date, a response to the request for information has not yet been received. Should Environment Canada provide a response in the future, any relevant information will be forwarded to PWGSC. Health Canada: To date, a response to the request for information has not yet been received. Should Health Canada provide a response in the future, any relevant information will be forwarded to PWGSC. Ontario Ministry of the Environment: Terrapex received a response from Mr. John McGlynn dated November 13, 2012. He indicated there are no outstanding active orders or approvals regarding the subject site. A copy of the MOE correspondence is included in Appendix XI. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 31 MOE Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Office: Terrapex received a response from Ms. Liz Mico dated October 29, 2012. She indicated that the MOE FOI office was unable to process our request for the subject site because they require a municipal address/lot and Concession and do not file records by Pin, Block or Register Plan numbers and cannot accept intersections or descriptions in relation to other properties as valid search parameters. A copy of the MOE correspondence is included in Appendix XI. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources: Terrapex received a response from Mr. Korey Walker dated October 9, 2012. Mr. Walker suggested several other sources of information. A copy of the MNR correspondence is included in Appendix XI. Terrapex conducted a search of the information provided on the MNR NHIC website (http://nhic.mnr.gov.on.ca) and the Land Information Ontario (LIO) website (http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/LIO/index.html) to identify any environmentally sensitive areas or areas of natural significance within the study area. The query of natural areas in the Biodiversity Explorer did not identify any provincial parks, conservation reserves, provincially significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI), provincially significant wetlands, or wilderness areas on the subject site or within the study area. Note the Port Burwell Provincial Park is located approximately 130 m west of the site. Long Point Conservation Authority: To date, a response to the request for information has not yet been received. Should the Long Point Conservation Authority provide a response in the future, any relevant information will be forwarded to PWGSC. Technical Standards & Safety Authority (TSSA) Fuels Safety Division: Terrapex received a response from Ms. Sarah Quibell dated October 5, 2012. Ms. Quibell indicated that the TSSA was not able to locate any records. Since the subject property is a federal property, TSSA has no jurisdiction over it. A copy of the TSSA correspondence is included in Appendix XI. Municipality of Bayham: To date, a response to the request for information has not yet been received. Should the Municipality of Bayham provide a response in the future, any relevant information will be forwarded to PWGSC. 4.1.6 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS Terrapex conducted a review of the following reports which were provided with the RFP: • Stantec Consulting Ltd., Assessment of Environmental Risks for Municipality of Bayham at Port Burwell (March 2012); and, PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 32 • MacViro Consultants Ltd., Enhanced Phase 1 Site Assessment, Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Site No. 4766 (March 2001), prepared for DFO. The following sections summarize the information presented in the previous environmental reports which is pertinent to the scope of work for this program. Stantec March 2012 Report: Stantec was retained by the Municipality of Bayham to assess environmental risks associated with the potential property transfer of federal lands at the Port Burwell SCH. The assessment was conducted in 2012 and consisted of a historical review. The significant findings of the Environmental Assessment component presented in the Stantec March 2012 Report are summarized below: • historical records review included the MacViro 2001 Report; • Port Burwell SCH was noted to be currently owned by Fisheries and Oceans Canada - Small Craft Harbours and consisting primarily of a water lot; • Port Burwell originally comprised a small fishing wharf in the 1840s and expanded to accommodate shipment of commodities (coal, potash, fuel oil, and fertilizer) in the early 1900s until 1976; • ownership of the harbour was transferred from PWGSC to DFO in 1973; • environmental legacies associated with undocumented spills and other releases over 75 years of storage, shipping, loading and offloading activities of commodities and a reference to a fire within an area of an 8,000 ton coal pile; • coal and potash piles were stored historically along both sides of Big Otter Creek; • temporarily stored bulk materials were transported to the northern portion of the harbour by conveyors located on the west pier, and were then transferred by conveyor boom over the Big Otter Creek to the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) tracks and related rail infrastructure located on the east side of the harbour; • a 2,700,000-L capacity steel bulk fuel oil tank, operated by Ingram Fuels, was located on the west harbour and received bulk fuel by boat; the fuel oil was distributed by tank trucks to inland markets; • continuous accumulation of sediment load from Big Otter Creek and the sporadic dredging activities to remove sediment in the upper harbour has led to the infilling of the turning basin; • Port Burwell SCH is presently used as a recreational and commercial fishing access point, a community wharf and a harbour of refuge; • Stantec provided several recommendations, including: • completion of an updated Phase I ESA; • a thorough search and compilation of all parcel descriptions, legal survey(s) and land registry documentation associated with the subject site; TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 33 • additional sediment quality investigations for depths to 8 m below Lake Erie for areas that would require dredging and disposal of sediment to allow for a commercial ferry service to operate in the harbour; • soil and groundwater investigations to fully assess any environmental impacts from historical land uses for the upland parcel segments under consideration for transfer; and, • a thorough assessment of environmental risks to the Municipality of Bayham prior to transfer of subject properties. MacViro March 2001 Report: MacViro was retained by PWGSC on behalf of DFO to conduct an enhanced Phase I ESA on the Port Burwell SCH. The assessment was conducted in 2001 and consisted of a historical review. The significant findings of the Environmental Assessment component presented in the MacViro March 2001 Report are summarized below: • Port Burwell SCH was noted to be currently owned by Fisheries and Oceans Canada - Small Craft Harbours comprising primarily water lots and occupying a total property area of approximately 81.62 ha; as previously noted in this report, the available plans of survey identify the size of the site as 78.27 ha; • Port Burwell originally comprised a small fishing wharf in the 1830s and expanded in the 1890s until the early 1900s to accommodate shipment of coal; • construction and repairs to the east shore wall, east pier, west shore wall, west rubble mound, and concrete breakwater occurred from 1904 to 1975; • ownership of the harbour was transferred from PWGSC to DFO in 1973; • coal was stored historically along both sides of Big Otter Creek; coal and phosphate fertilizer were loaded on ships in the harbour and transported through the channel; • sewer outfall for the municipal water pollution control plant discharges into the Port Burwell SCH; • a 2,700,000-L capacity steel bulk fuel oil tank, operated by Ingram Fuels, was located on the west harbour and received bulk fuel by boat; fuel oil was distributed by tank trucks to inland markets; spill events may be associated with storage and handling over the years; • heavy siltation of harbour has been an ongoing problem since the mid -1800s; dredging activities occur annually; • Port Burwell SCH is presently used as a recreational access point and a thoroughfare for commercial fishing vessels that berth upstream, commercial gaswell maintenance, a community wharf, and a harbour of refuge; PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 34 • a fuel facility is located on the east shore adjacent to the federal property and is a potential environmental concern to the property, however, Macviro does not indicate the location of the fuel facility; • MacViro collected six surficial sediment samples from the harbour beds of the Port Burwell SCH and one surface soil sample from the parcel of land on the east beach property (Part 1 on Plan11 R-6760) for analysis of various COPCs; • MacViro stated that four of the six sediment samples exceeded either the CCME ISQGs or the MOE PSQGs LEL for various parameters as follows: • Sample SED1-1 (East of Water Pollution Control Plant): exceeded the MOE LEL for TOC (no CCME ISQG exists) and the CCME ISQGs for acenapthene, phenanthrene and pyrene; • Sample SED1-2 (East of Talisman ASTs): exceeded the MOE LEL for manganese, TOC, TKN, phosphorus and pp -DDE (no CCME ISQG exist); note SED1-2 also exceeded the MOE LEL for copper but was below the applicable CCME ISQG; • Sample SED1-3 (26 m west of concrete pier (north corner)): exceeded the MOE LEL for TOC and pp -DDE (no CCME ISQG exist); • Sample SED1-6 (West and north of east concrete and steel dock (northwest corner): exceeded the MOE criteria for TOC (no CCME ISQG exists); • MacViro noted that the quality of groundwater, surface water and air at the subject site was not assessed during the Phase I ESA; • MacViro provided several recommendations, including: • Further delineation of the extent of sediment impacts on and off the Port Burwell SCH property; and, • Collection of background sediment samples and comparison of the analytical laboratory results to the sediment on the Port Burwell SCH property. 4.1.7 WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK Terrapex completed a review information available on the Government of Canada Species at Risk website and the Ontario's Biodiversity: Species at Risk website (available through the ROM in partnership with the MNR) to assess the potential of suspected SAR, as listed under Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA), to be present at or near APEC 1. Terrapex has completed the information review based on information available from the resources listed above. A summary of the information gathered during this information review is presented in Appendix XII. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 35 Species at Risk Summary. A review of on-line information identified the following taxonomic groups and number of Special Concern, Threatened, or Endangered Species that are potentially present at APEC 1: five birds (Acadian Flycatcher, Cerulean Warbler, Louisiana Waterthrush, Hooded Warbler, and Yellow -breasted Chat); two fishes (Brindled Madtom and Eastern Sand Darter); two mammals (American Badger and Woodland Vole); and seven reptiles (Jefferson Salamander, Fowler's Toad, Blanding's Turtle, Milksnake, Gray Ratsnake, Eastern Ribbonsnake, and Massassauga). Species at Risk Habitat Summary: Preferential habitats for various SAR were identified in the on-line information included forested areas, grasslands shrubby vegetation and open areas, wetlands and marshes, shorelines and waterbodies (streams and rivers). All SAR listed above are known to inhabit one or more of these natural habitats. During the November 19, 2012 site inspection, Terrapex completed a general reconnaissance of the accessible areas of APEC 1 to determine whether suitable natural habitat for SAR exists. Based on this cursory walkover, it was confirmed that forested areas, grasslands and open areas, wetlands and marshes, and waterbodies all exist at APEC 1 and that it would be considered to be habitat suitable for potential SAR identified for the site. A detailed summary of these habitats for each potential SAR listed above is presented in Appendix XII. Based on findings, further investigation of the indentified habitats at the site would be required to confirm the actual presence of SAR at the site. If SAR was determined to be present, mitigative measures should be implemented at Port Burwell SCH to protect SAR and conserve important habitats on the property. 4.2 INTERVIEW PROGRAM 4.2.1 SITE REPRESENTATIVES Terrapex conducted telephone and/or email interviews with representatives of federal, provincial and municipal government agencies, primarily to request any environmental information in their files related to the subject site, and/or any available information pertaining to water bodies and areas of natural significance within the study area. Refer to the responses documented in Section 4.1.4 and included in Appendix XI. Prior to conducting the Phase I ESA site inspection, Mr. Ayuen also interviewed via telephone and email a representative of DFO. The relevant information obtained during this interview is summarized in the following section. Mr. Mark Sandeman, Area Operations Officer Area Manager, Client Services, Small Craft Harbours Branch, Central & Arctic Region at DFO. Terrapex conducted an PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 36 interview via email with Mr. Sandeman on November 19, 2012. He provided the following information: • The subject site is federally owned and is not zoned. • The subject site is currently used only as a recreational and commercial fishing access point due to the low water levels. • The subject site is mostly water lots and covers an area of approximately 82 ha. As previously noted in this report, the available plans of survey document the site as 78.27 ha in size. • The only building on the subject site is the concrete block automation building, which is owned by the Canadian Coast Guard. It is currently abandoned and was previously assessed; he did not know the age of the building. • Prior to the 1970's, the subject site was used as a commercial/industrial port. • The topography of the land portions of the subject site is relatively flat with grass/weeds. A wooden boardwalk exists south of the automation building. • An environmental assessment for the Municipality was completed by Stantec in March 2012 that includes previous environmental work (Terrapex reviewed the Stantec (March 2012) report and a summary is provided in Section 4.1.6). • Historically, use of the site was for unloading and loading of industrial and commercial materials, such as lumber, shingles, staves, coal and other commodities. • DFO is not aware of any ASTs or USTs present on the site, and no spills have been recorded on the property. • DFO does not possess a certificate of approval for equipment, emissions, or waste handling/disposal at the subject site. It was also noted that the subject site does not contain equipment which creates emissions, nor are there any activities at the site pertaining to the handling and disposal of waste materials. • DFO is not aware of any environmental concerns to the subject site from surrounding property uses. 4.2.2 ADDITIONAL INTERVIEWS While on-site to conduct the site reconnaissance, Mr. Ayuen also interviewed a long time Port Burwell resident knowledgeable of the current property activities, as well as of the former property activities. The relevant information obtained during this interview is summarized in the following section. Mr. Ron Bradfield, Owner/Operator of Bradfields Marina: Terrapex interviewed Mr. Bradfield on November 19, 2012 and December 5, 2012. He provided the following PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 37 information additional to that provided by Mr. Sandeman: • Mr. Bradfield is a long-time resident of Port Burwell and was a former Coast Guard lighthouse keeper employee. • Mr. Bradfield stated that the automation building was used up to 1991 to provide power for the lighthouse from the diesel generators that were housed within it. • Between the years, 1990 to 1991, the automation building was abandoned when the lighthouse was upgraded to solar -powered lights. • Mr. Bradfield witnessed many undocumented fuel spills from various watercraft in the Port Burwell SCH throughout the years as a resident and as an operator of the Bradfields Marina. • Coal and potash piles were historically stored along both sides of Big Otter Creek. • Temporarily stored bulk materials (coal and potash) were transported to the northern portion of the harbour by conveyors located on the west pier and were then transferred by conveyor boom over the Big Otter Creek to the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) yard located on the east side of the harbour. The materials would be shipped to inland markets via railcars. • A large capacity steel bulk fuel oil tank was located on the west harbour and received bulk fuel via boats. The fuel oil was distributed via tanker trucks to inland markets. • The turning basin was at least 50 feet deep and large ships, ferries, and barges would use the Port Burwell SCH. 4.3 SITE INSPECTION The Enhanced Phase I ESA site inspection of the subject site was conducted by Mr. Raymond Ayuen of Terrapex on November 19, 2012. Note that at time of the site inspection, a portion of Big Otter Creek was dredged in preparation for the delivery and permanent placement of the submarine HMCS Ojibwa as part of the Elgin Military Museum of Naval History exhibit. Dredging materials were deposited in Lake Erie south of the east beach parcel and on the Port Burwell Harbour Facility property along the west pier of the harbour. Selected photographs of the subject site are included in Appendix 11. 4.3.1 SITE DESCRIPTION General Site Description: The subject site includes part of the bed of Big Otter Creek, part of the bed of Lake Erie and portions of land not covered by water. Based on information provided by PWGSC, the land portions of the subject site form Parts 2, 6, TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 38 and 7 on Plan 11 R-6760 and Plan 11 R-7468 occupy an area of 78.27 hectares (ha). The GPS coordinates recorded for the subject site during the Phase I ESA site inspection were NAD83 17 T 515781.33 m east and 4720825.29 m north. Refer to Figure 1 for the location of the subject site. Roads, Parking Facilities, Rights -of -Way: The subject site is accessible by land and by watercraft. Chatham Street provides access and parking to the land portions on the west side of Big Otter Creek and Robinson Street provides access to the east side of Big Otter Creek and the public beach area (Part 1 on Plan 11R-7468). No registered easements or rights-of-way crossing the subject site were identified in the property title search information, or observed on site during the site inspection. Property Use: The property is registered as being owned by Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada and the subject site is operated under the administration and control of DFO for transportation (marine) purposes. Currently the harbour is being used as an access point for recreational boating and commercial fishing. Buildings, Structures, and Other Improvements: One structure is currently present on the subject site. The former Coast Guard automation building is located west of the Port Burwell Park parking area on the west side of the west pier. The building is currently vacant, has a floor area of 30 mz and was constructed in 1972. The building has been previously classified as a Contaminated Site 00013964 by DFRP, however, according to DFRP, the building has been previously assessed and no further action is required. The FCSI number for this building is CF 00271 and the DFRP Property Number is 85247. It reportedly was used historically for warehouse, workshop and storage. The building has been abandoned since the 1990s and according to Mr. Mark Sandeman (DFO) and Mr. Ron Bradfield, has been previously inspected and assessed. The single -story brick building formerly housed the diesel generator to provide power to the lighthouse on the southwest tip of the land portion of the subject site. Evidence of a fuel oil tank (AST or UST) associated with the former diesel generator was not observed. The building was completely fenced in and not accessible at the time of the site inspection. The property is not presently serviced by municipal water, telephone, electrical utilities, sanitary sewers, or natural gas utilities. There are no other buildings present on the subject site. Other observed structures include concrete piers located on the east and west side of the harbour. Site Topography: The subject site consists primarily of water lots located on Big Otter Creek and on the southern shoreline of Lake Erie with portions of land not covered by TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 39 water on both sides of Big Otter Creek and the West Pier parcel of land. The topography of the land portions of the subject site is relatively flat with slight slope toward Lake Erie. Ground cover across the site consisted of grasses and sparse vegetation in the land portions on the east and west sides of Big Otter Creek. Based on topography, the general direction of groundwater flow at the site is assumed to be south, toward Lake Erie and east toward Big Otter Creek (on the land portions west of the harbour). With the exception of the east pier and the east beach parcel of land, there is no land parcels on the east side of the harbour. It is assumed that groundwater flow on the adjacent properties to the east would likely be to the west towards Big Otter Creek and the south towards Lake Erie. Groundwater flow would likely be south towards Lake Erie on the east beach land parcel based on its proximity to Lake Erie. However, it should be noted that shallow groundwater flow can be locally influenced by topography, variable stratigraphy, underground trenches and conduits generally associated with buried utilities, and/or subsurface structures. Watercourses, Ditches, or Standing Water. The subject site comprises mostly water lots. There were no ditches or standing water present on the land portions of the subject site, which are immediately adjacent to Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie. Pits and Lagoons: No pits or lagoons were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Fill: Evidence of fill (coal) was observed on site during the site inspection on the West Pier parcel, between the parking area and the sewage plant on Chatham Street. Based on information from the records review, the subject site is located on fill and modern Lake Erie beach deposits consisting of sand and gravel, and sand and remnants of industrial and commercial materials, such as coal and potash historically stored on the subject site. 4.3.2 SITE INFRASTRUCTURE Heating and Cooling: No heating and cooling units were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Potable Water Supply: The subject site is serviced by a potable water supply from a municipal drinking water system. Drains and Sumps: No drains or sumps were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Wastewater. The subject site does not produce wastewater and therefore does not have any wastewater treatment facilities. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 40 Sewage Disposal: No sewage is produced at the subject site. Wells: No wells or evidence of water or abandoned wells were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. The Ecol-og ERIS search of the WWIS database located fifteen records (one record on the subject site and fourteen records on surrounding properties). The one record of a well on the subject site (WWIS-8) was a 2.5 m deep test hole drilled in 1960 in the East Beach Parcel. However, based on the legal survey provided by PWGSC, WWIS-8 is not located on the subject site and one well record (WWIS-1) is located on the subject site. WWIS-1 was a 7.92 m deep test hole drilled in 1960. 4.3.3 MATERIALS HANDLING AND STORAGE Storage Tanks: No permanent ASTs or evidence of USTs (fittings, piping, vents, etc.) were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. However, two ASTs of unknown size and contents were observed on the neighbouring Port Burwell Harbour Facility property immediately west of the site. Refer to Figure 3 for the approximate locations of these storage tanks on the property. Storage Containers: There were no storage containers observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Hazardous Materials: There were no hazardous materials observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Wastes: Waste materials were not observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Unidentified Substances: There were no unidentified substances observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Stained Materials: Stained materials were not observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Residues: No residues were observed on any of the concrete surfaces on the subject site. There were no other residues observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Stressed Vegetation: No evidence of stressed vegetation was observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Odours: No significant odours were noted at the subject site during the site inspection. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 41 4.3.4 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND SPECIAL ATTENTION ITEMS Asbestos -Containing Material: Building materials in structures constructed prior to 1980 may contain ACM, and non -friable forms of asbestos are still in use. There were no asbestos -containing materials identified during the site inspection. Lead: In structures constructed prior to 1980, lead may be present in plumbing, wiring, and surface coatings (paints, enamels, varnishes, etc.) used on walls, pipes, and other structures. The concern with peeling lead-based paint is that it allows for the potential inhalation and ingestion of the lead dust by those who work in or inhabit the building. Additionally, exterior paint may also contaminate surrounding soils and waterways. Other than the former Coast Guard automation building which has previously been assessed, no structures were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Mercury. Mercury -containing devices are commonly found in many industrial settings. Items which may contain mercury include fluorescent lamps, high intensity discharge (HID) lamps, temperature sensitive switches, tilt switches, thermostats, float switches, and flow metres. Mercury may also be present in surface coatings, including paint. Other than the former Coast Guard automation building which has previously been assessed, no structures were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Other Designated Substances: In addition to asbestos, lead and mercury, O. Reg. 490/09 also designates acrylonitrile, arsenic, benzene, coke oven emissions, ethylene oxide, isocyanates, silica and vinyl chloride as designated substances. None of these substances were observed or suspected to be present at the subject site, with the exception of silica. Silica is present in the concrete materials found in the concrete piers and the former Coast Guard automation building which has previously been assessed. As silica is only of concern when it is disturbed, if an installation is to be renovated or demolished, workers should take appropriate precautions to prevent the inhalation of silica dust during the renovation or demolition activities. Polychlorinated Biphenyls: In Canada, PCBs were prohibited from being used in products, equipment, machinery, and electrical transformers/capacitors/ballasts manufactured or imported into the country after 1980. Older equipment installed between approximately the 1950s and 1980s which has not been converted and is still in use today, may contain PCBs. In addition, PCBs may also be present in various buildings materials such as caulking and surface coatings, including paint. Other than the former Coast Guard automation building which has previously been assessed, no structures were observed on the subject site during the site inspection that could possibly contain PCBs. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 42 Ozone -Depleting Substances (ODS): ODS -containing equipment was not observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation: Spray -on foam insulation was not observed on the subject site during the site inspection. Mould: No areas of suspected mould were observed on the subject site during the site inspection. 4.3.5 ADJACENT PROPERTIES The Port Burwell SCH: The Port Burwell SCH is surrounded by the following land uses: North: Water lot and land portions occupied by Bradfields Marina, residential and commercial beyond. East: Mixed commercial and residential properties along the east and west side of Robinson Street, with residential beyond. South: Open waters of Lake Erie. West: Private and publicly owned lands along entire extent of western property boundary to Chatham Street. The various land owners include; Water Pollution Control plant, Port Burwell Harbour Facility, and vacant municipal property. Beyond Chatham Street is a mix of residential, and the Port Burwell Provincial Park. Documented uses and activities on surrounding properties in close proximity to the subject site (particularly the immediately adjacent two ASTs on the Port Burwell Harbour Facility and the AST located at Bradfields Marina) represent potential environmental concerns. Of particular note are the following: the historical and current use of surrounding properties for industrial and commercial storage purposes; railway transportation of materials including coal, potash, fuel oil, lumber and staves; the handling and storage of petroleum products (including the adjacent two ASTs on the Port Burwell Harbour Facility and the UST located at Bradfields Marina); the production, collection, handling, and/or storage of regulated wastes; and, the occurrence of spills. 4.4 SUMMARY OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN Potential environmental concerns were identified at the subject site during the Phase I ESA component. Based on the review, evaluation, and interpretation of the information obtained from the Phase I ESA records review, interviews, and site reconnaissance, one APEC was identified on the subject site and two APECS were identified adjacent to the subject site. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 43 APEC 1 (Parts 2, 6, and 7 on Plan 11 R-6760) comprises the water lots and portions of land encompassing the downstream portion of Big Otter Creek and a portion of Lake Erie. APEC 2 comprises the off-site lands adjacent to the west property boundary of the subject site. APEC 3 comprises the off-site lands adjacent to the east property boundary of the subject site. The three APECs and associated COPCs are summarized in Table 1. Refer to Figure 2 for the locations of the APECs relative to the subject site. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 44 5.0 RESULTS OF PHASE II ESA 5.1 FIELD CONDITIONS Terrapex conducted the on-site field components of the Phase II ESA on November 20, December 5, and December 6, 2012. Refer to Appendix II for selected photographs taken during Phase II ESA field activities. 5.1.1 SOIL The stratigraphy and soil conditions encountered at each sampling location, along with the detected odours for each soil sample, are described in the soil sampling logs included in Appendix III, and summarized below. The locations of the three drilled boreholes (MW101 to MW103) were selected to assess near -surface and subsurface conditions at APEC 1 arising from the potential environmental concerns identified during the Phase I ESA component (refer to Table 1). Boreholes MW101, MW 102, and MW103 were advanced through sod and topsoil on the Port Burwell SCH. Coal fragments were encountered in boreholes MW101 and MW102 to a depth of 0.6 m bg and 0.3 m bg, respectively. The topsoil/coal layer was underlain by medium to fine sand to a depth of 7.6 m bg. Trace seashells were encountered at 4.2 m bg in MW101 and coarse to medium sand was encountered at 6.1 m bg. In MW103, approximately 0.15 m of topsoil with some sand and organics (rootlets, grass) overlay medium to fine sand to 1.5 m bg. Beneath the sand, sandy silt with trace seashell fragments was encountered to 7.6 m bg. Olfactory evidence of potential impacts, was not detected during the soil sampling in any of the drilled boreholes. 5.1.2 SEDIMENT The stratigraphy and sediment conditions encountered at each sampling location, along with the detected odours for each sediment sample, are described in the sediment sampling logs included in Appendix III, and summarized below. The locations of the three sediment cores (SED1 to SED3) and the surface sediment samples (SED4 to SED9) were selected to assess near -surface and subsurface conditions at APEC 1 arising from potential environmental concerns identified during the Phase I ESA component (refer to Table 1). Surface sediment samples (SED5, SEDT and SED8) were collected as background reference samples. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 45 The sediment cores (SED1 to SED3) were advanced from a stationary floating raft through the water in Big Otter Creek to the underlying sediment. The depth of water in Big Otter Creek ranged from 3.1 m to 3.7 m. The sediment conditions beneath the water body consisted of silt with trace sand and/or clay that extended to depths of 5.2 m below water surface (bws) at SED 1 to sandy silt with trace clay that extended to 5.2 m bws and 4.6 m bws at SED2 and SED3, respectively. At SED1 and SED2, clayey silt was encountered to the maximum core depth of 7.6 m bws. At SED3, sand with some silt was encountered to the maximum core depth of 6.1 m bws. Sea shell fragments were noted in SED1 from 3.1 m to 5.2 m bws in SED1 and 5.2 m to 7.6 m bws in SED2. Visual and olfactory evidence of potential impacts, were not detected in any sediment samples collected from any of the sampling locations. 5.1.3 GROUNDWATER The results of the well monitoring event conducted by Terrapex on December 5, 2012 are presented in Table 2, and summarized below. The purge water measurements recorded during the development of the monitoring wells prior to the collection of groundwater samples on December 5, 2012 are presented in Table 3. December 5, 2012 Well Monitoring Event: The results of the well monitoring event conducted on December 5, 2012 are described below: • Combustible vapour concentrations measured with the Gastechtor within the headspace of the three monitoring wells ranged from 25 parts per million (ppm) by volume (MW 101) to 12% of the lower explosive limit (LEL) in MW 103. • Organic vapour concentrations measured with the PID within the headspace of the three monitoring wells ranged from 0.0 ppm (MW103) to 0.4 ppm (MW102). • LNAPLs were not detected on the surface of the groundwater in any of the three monitoring wells. Petroleum hydrocarbon sheen was also not observed on the groundwater in the monitoring wells. • DNAPLs were not detected in any of the three monitoring wells. • The depth to groundwater from grade ranged from a minimum of 0.94 m in MW103 to a maximum of 1.48 m in MW101 and MW102. • The static groundwater table elevations relative to the TBM ranged from a maximum of 97.44 m in MW101 to a minimum of 97.13 m in MW102. Groundwater Flow Direction: Groundwater flow across the property was estimated based on the static groundwater table elevations calculated for the December 5, 2012 well monitoring event. However, given the proximity of the monitoring wells to the adjacent Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie, groundwater elevations may be significantly TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 46 influenced by changes in the surface water elevation. As such, the calculated groundwater flow may not be reflective of actual groundwater flow conditions at the site. Therefore, the interpreted groundwater flow direction is assumed to be east, towards Big Otter Creek. Refer to Figure 7 for the interpreted direction of groundwater flow. Hydraulic Conductivity: Field conductivity testing was not conducted on December 5, 2012 at the monitoring wells as groundwater had not sufficiently recovered to static groundwater levels following the groundwater sampling activities to accurately calculate groundwater hydraulic conductivity. 5.2 SELECTION OF APPLICABLE GUIDELINES/STANDARDS The subject site is located on the Port Burwell SCH property, which is currently owned by Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, DFO and operated under the administration and control of DFO for transportation marine purposes. Therefore, federal guidelines and standards developed by the CCME and Environment Canada are applicable. Parameters for which the federal documents do not provide guidelines or standards have been compared to the appropriate provincial site condition standards developed by the MOE. 5.2.1 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER GUIDELINES Federal Guidelines and Standards: Federal comparison criteria for soil analytical results were selected from the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012), hereinafter referred to as the CCME CEQG. In addition, federal comparison criteria for PHCs F1 to F4 soil analytical results were selected from the CCME Canada -Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil (May 2001, revised January 2008), hereinafter referred to as the CCME CWS. Federal comparison criteria for groundwater analytical results were selected from the Environment Canada Guidance Document on Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Federal Contaminated Sites (May 2010, updated November 2012), hereinafter referred to as the Environment Canada FIGQG. The site-specific conditions which were taken into consideration and formed the basis for the selection of guidelines and standards are described below: • The subject site and surrounding properties within 100 m of the site property boundaries are supplied by a municipal drinking water system. Port Burwell acquires its water from surface sources (Lake Erie). • The subject site is zoned to permit recreational and commercial fishing access uses, which can be considered to be a commercial land use. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 47 • The subsurface materials encountered at the subject site consisted predominantly of coarse fill material and sand. Soil texture was determined to be coarse textured during field examination and confirmed by grain size distribution analysis. Based on the consideration of site-specific conditions for the subject site, the guidelines and standards selected for evaluating soil and groundwater laboratory analytical results are: • CCME CEQG Chapter 7 - Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health; Soil Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for coarse- grained surface soils in a commercial land use provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table (http://st-ts.ccme.ca/). Based on Health Canada recommendations for the assessment and management of federal sites contaminated with carcinogenic substances, the CCME SQG for benzene and the benzo[a]pyrene Total Potency Equivalent (B[a]P TPE) at a 10-5 Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR) were used. • CCME Canada -Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil - Technical Supplement (January 2008); Table 3 Tier 1 Levels for coarse-grained surface soils in a commercial land use; Vapour Inhalation (indoor, slab -on -grade) Exposure Pathway for PHC F1; Eco Soil Contact Exposure Pathway for PHC F2, PHC F3, and PHC F4. Tier 2 Levels for coarse grained surface soil in a commercial land use were selected to evaluate the PHC F1 to F4 analytical results for soil samples collected from the one borehole (MW102) located within 10 m of a surface water body. • CCME CEQG Chapter 4 - Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CWQG-PAL) for Freshwater (FW) provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table (http://st-ts.ccme.ca/). These criteria were used to evaluate the analytical results for groundwater samples collected from the one monitoring well (MW102) located within 10 m of a surface water body. • Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines (FIGQGs) presented in the Environment Canada Guidance Document on Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Federal Contaminated Sites (May 2010, updated November 2012). Table 3 Tier 1 Guidelines for coarse-grained soils in Commercial and Industrial land uses. Provincial Standards: Provincial comparison criteria for soil and groundwater analytical results were selected from the MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011), hereinafter referred to as the MOE Standards. Provincial Site Condition Standards were selected using the criteria set out in Part IX of Ontario Regulation (O. Reg.) 153/04 (Records of Site Condition — Part XV.1 of the Act), made under the Environmental PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 48 Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19. In addition to the site-specific conditions considered in the selection of the federal guidelines and standards, the following conditions were also taken into consideration in the selection of provincial site condition standards: • The subject site is primarily water lots with several parcels of land located within 30 m of a water body (Big Otter Creek/Lake Erie). • The soil at the subject site generally has a pH value within the MOE range for surface soil of 5 to 9. • The subject site is not considered a shallow soil property, as defined in O. Reg. 153/04. Greater than 2 m of overburden was encountered at all drilled borehole sampling locations on the subject site during the Phase II ESA. Based on the preceding information and assumptions, the generic soil standards for coarse-textured soils in all property uses to be used within 30 m of a water body, and the non -potable groundwater standards, provided in Table 9 of the April 2011 MOE Standards were selected for evaluating the laboratory analytical results for parameters for which the federal documents do not provide guidelines or standards. 5.2.2 SEDIMENT GUIDELINES Federal Guidelines: Federal comparison criteria for sediment analytical results were selected from the CCME CEQG. The following guidelines were utilized for evaluating sediment laboratory analytical results: • CCME CEQG Chapter 6 — Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (freshwater); Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) for sediments provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table. Chapter 6 of the CCME CEQG provides sediment quality assessment values which have been derived for various parameters. The CCME ISQGs represent lower limit values for COPCs which predict toxicity to less than 5% of the sediment -dwelling organisms, and the CCME PELs represent upper limit values for COPCs which predict toxicity to 50% or more of the sediment -dwelling organisms. These values are used to define three ranges of chemical concentrations in order to predict the effect that a COPC concentration will have on the biological components in an aquatic ecosystem, as follows: • the minimal effect range, in which the concentration of a COPC will rarely have an adverse effect on the biota, is represented by the range less than the applicable CCME ISQG; • the possible effect range, in which the concentration of a COPC will occasionally have an adverse effect on the biota, is represented by the range between the PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 49 applicable CCME ISQG and the CCME PEL; and, • the probable effect range, in which the concentration of a COPC will frequently have an adverse effect on the biota, is represented by the range greater than the applicable CCME PEL. Federal/Provincial Guidance: Additional guidance for evaluating sediment analytical results is provided in the Framework for Addressing and Managing Aquatic Contaminated Sites Under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (May 13, 2010), hereinafter referred to as the FCSAP Framework. This document, was developed by the Contaminated Sites Management Working Group (CSMWG) and is based on the CSMWG 10 -step process for terrestrial contaminated sites (A Federal Approach to Contaminated Sites). The FCSAP Framework is organized into four tiers (Problem Formulation, Screening Level Risk Assessment (SLRA), Detailed Level Risk Assessment (DLRA), and Risk Management), each of which have corresponding steps. The Problem Formulation and SLRA (applicable to the scope of work conducted during the current study), includes four steps, as follows: • Step 1 - Identification of Suspect Aquatic Site. • Step 2 - Historical Review and development of a Sampling and Analysis Plan. • Step 3 - Initial Testing Program to determine if the suspected aquatic site is contaminated using the following: • determine whether concentrations of COPCs are greater than sediment quality guideline low levels (CCME ISQGs or MOE LELs); • determine whether the COPCs are substances that could biomagnify; and, • compare exceeding concentrations of COPCs at the exposed sites to the corresponding concentrations of COPCs at the reference areas and determine whether exceeding concentrations of COPCs at the exposed sites are less than 20% above the corresponding concentrations of COPCs at the reference areas. • Step 4 - Initial Site Classification using the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan Aquatic Sites Classification System (2010, version 1.0). Provincial Guidelines: Provincial comparison criteria for sediment were selected from the MOE Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008), hereinafter referred to as the MOE Guidelines. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 50 Similar to Chapter 6 of the CCME CEQG, the MOE Guidelines provide sediment quality assessment values which have been derived for various parameters. The LELs represent lower limit values for COPCs, and the SELs represent upper limit values for COPCs. The following guidelines were selected for evaluating sediment laboratory analytical results: • Table 1 - Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines for Metals and Nutrients; • Table 2b - Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons; and, • Table 3 - Background Sediment Concentrations for Metals. 5.3 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM RESULTS 5.3.1 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS Laboratory results for the soil samples submitted to Maxxam for analysis are presented in Tables 4 through 7. Copies of the Laboratory Certificates of Analysis for the analyzed soil samples are included in Appendix XIII. Refer to Figure 4 for a graphic summary of the exceedances of the CCME SQGs, CCME CWS, and MOE Standards (for parameters for which the federal documents do not provide guidelines or standards). Petroleum Hydrocarbons: As shown in Table 4, four soil samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of BTEX and PHCs F1 to F4. The concentration of PHC F2 exceeded the applicable comparison criteria in one soil sample, as described below: • PHC F2: Exceeded the applicable CCME CWS Tier 2 Level and MOE Table 9 Standards in sample MW102-4 at a depth of 4.6 to 6.1 m bgs. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: As shown in Table 5, four soil samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of PAHs. Concentrations of PAH parameters exceeded the applicable comparison criteria in three soil samples from two locations, as described below: • Methylnaphthalene, 1-, 2-, and 1- & 2- (total): Concentrations of 1-, 2-, and/or 1- & 2- (total) methylnaphthalene exceeded the applicable MOE Table 9 Standard in three samples MW101-1B, MW102-1B and MW102-1E (field duplicate of MW 102-1 B) at a depth of 0.3 to 0.4 m bgs and 0.15 to 0.3 m bgs, respectively (no CCME SQG is provided for these parameters). • Naphthalene: Concentrations of naphthalene exceeded the applicable CCME SQG in three samples MW101-1B, MW102-1B and MW102-1E (field TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 51 duplicate of MW 102-1 B) at a depth of 0.3 to 0.4 m bgs and 0.15 to 0.3 m bgs, respectively. • Phenanthrene: Concentrations of phenanthrene exceeded the applicable CCME SQG in three samples MW101-1B, MW102-1B and MW102-1E (field duplicate of MW102-1B) at a depth of 0.3 to 0.4 m bgs and 0.15 to 0.3 m bgs, respectively. • Index of Additive Cancer Risk: An Index of Additive Cancer Risk (IACR) greater than the applicable CCME SQG was calculated for soil sample MW 102-1 B. Metals: As shown in Table 6, four soil samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of metals. Concentrations of metals in the four samples did not exceed the applicable comparison criteria. pH: As shown in Table 6, four soil samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of pH. The pH values for all four samples were within the ranges specified in the applicable Guidelines/Standards. Organochlorine Pesticides: As shown in Table 7, four soil samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of OCPs. Concentrations of OCPs in the four samples did not exceed the applicable comparison criteria. Polychlorinated Biphenyls: As shown in Table 7, four soil samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of PCBs. Concentrations of PCBs in the four samples did not exceed the applicable comparison criteria. Grain Size: Three representative soil samples were submitted for grain size distribution analysis to determine the distribution of particle sizes in the material encountered at the subject site, particularly the percentage of particles equal to or larger than 75 lam in diameter. As shown on the Laboratory Certificate of Analysis included in Appendix XIII, the results of the sieve analysis for soil samples MW101-3 and MW102-3 indicate that greater than 50% by mass of the particles are 75 lam or larger in diameter. The results of the sieve analysis for soil sample MW103-1 indicate that less than 50% by mass of the particles are 75 lam or larger in diameter. Based on this result, the on-site materials are considered coarse textured with respect to the CCME (and MOE) definition, and therefore, the appropriate soil criteria for use at the subject site are those for coarse- textured soils. 5.3.2 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS Laboratory results for the sediment samples submitted to Maxxam for analysis are presented in Tables 8 through 12. Copies of the Laboratory Certificates of Analysis for the analyzed sediment samples are included in Appendix XIII. Refer to Figures 5A and TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 52 5B for a graphic summary of the exceedances of the CCME ISGQs/PELs and the MOE Guidelines (for parameters for which the federal documents do not provide guidelines). Petroleum Hydrocarbons: As shown in Table 8, seven surficial sediment samples (SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1, SED3-1, SED4-1, SED6-1, and SED9-1), three deep sediment samples (SED1-3, SED2-3, and SED3-2) and three background sediment samples (SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1) were submitted for laboratory analysis of BTEX and PHCs F1 to F4 (parameters for which the provincial and federal documents do not provide guidelines or standards). Note that while sediment guidelines do not exist for PHCs, given the historical handling and storage of bulk fuels and coal directly adjacent to the site and the ongoing use of the site as an operational SCH, there is potential for PHC impact in sediment, particularly in the PHC F2 to F4 ranges. The purpose of the PHC analysis in sediment was to provide baseline concentrations of PHC parameters in sediment and determine if PHCs would be considered a contaminant of concern in sediment. Sediment Surficial Samples Concentrations of BTEX, and PHC F1 and F2 were less than the laboratory reportable detection limits (RDLs) in all seven samples, except for sample SED6-1 which had a reported concentration of PHC F2 of 19 pg/g. Concentrations of PHC F3 ranged from less than 10 pg/g (SED3-1) to 180 pg/g (SED1-1). Samples SED1-1 and SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1) had reported concentrations of PHC F4 of 40 pg/g and 12 pg/g, respectively. The concentration of PHC F4 was less than the laboratory RDL in the remaining five samples. Concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were greater than 20% above the corresponding background concentration, as follows: • PHC F3: Concentrations of PHC F3 were greater than 20% above the corresponding background concentration of 17 pg/g in sediment samples SED1- 1 SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED4-1, SED6-1, and SED9-1. • PHC F4: A concentration of PHC F4 was greater than 20% above the corresponding background concentration of 10 pg/g in sediment sample SED1-1. Sediment Core Samples Concentrations of BTEX, and PHC F1, F2, and F4 were less than the laboratory RDLs in all samples. Concentrations of PHC F4 ranged from 42 pg/g (SED3-2) to 69 pg/g (SED1-3). BTEX and PHC F1 to F4 concentrations from the analysed samples were not evaluated against background concentrations as background sediment core samples were not collected. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 53 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: As shown in Table 9, seven surficial sediment samples (SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1, SED3-1, SED4-1, SED6-1, and SED9-1), three deep sediment samples (SED1-3, SED2-3, and SED3-2) and three background sediment samples (SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1) were submitted for laboratory analysis of PAHs. Concentrations of PAH parameters exceeding the applicable comparison criteria are described below. Sediment Surficial Samples Concentrations of PAHs in all seven surficial sediment samples were below the applicable CCME ISQGs and MOE LELs where CCME ISQGs do not exist. Sediment Core Samples Concentrations of PAH parameters exceeded the applicable comparison criteria as follows: • Benzo(a)anthracene: The concentration of benzo(a)anthracene exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG in sample SED2-3. • Benzo(a)pyrene: The concentration of benzo(a)pyrene exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG in sample SED2-3. Phenanthrene: The concentration of phenanthrene exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG in sample SED2-3. • Pyrene: The concentration of pyrene exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG in sample SED2-3. PAH concentrations from the analysed samples were not evaluated against background concentrations as background sediment core samples were not collected. Metals/Inorgaincs: As shown in Table 10, seven surficial sediment samples (SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1, SED3-1, SED4-1, SED6-1, and SED9-1), three deep sediment samples (SED1-3, SED2-3, and SED3-2) and three background sediment samples (SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1) were submitted for laboratory analysis of metals and inorganics. Concentrations of metal and inorganic parameters exceeding the applicable comparison criteria are described below. Sediment Surficial Samples Concentrations of metals and inorganics exceeded the applicable comparison criteria as follows: • Manganese. A manganese concentration of 560 pg/g from SED9-1 exceeded the applicable MOE LEL of 400 pg/g (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 54 The calculated average concentration of manganese in the background sediment samples was 190 pg/g. • Phosphorus: Concentrations of phosphorus ranging from 620 pg/g to 810 pg/g in samples SED1-1, SED10-1(field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1, SED3-1, SED4- 1, and SED9-1 exceeded the applicable MOE LEL of 600 pg/g (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). The calculated average concentration of phosphorus in the background sediment samples was 1000 pg/g. As the concentration of phosphorus at these locations are not greater than 20% above the calculated background concentration, phosphorus will not be considered an exceedance when determining the extent of impacts. (This concentration should still be considered when developing a risk management approach). • Total Kieldahl Nitrogen (TKN): TKN concentrations of 784 pg/g and 802 pg/g in samples SED4-1 and SED9-1, respectively, exceeded the MOE LEL of 550 pg/g (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). The calculated average concentration of TKN in the background sediment samples was 72 pg/g. • Total Organic Carbon (TOC): TOC concentrations of 12,000 pg/g and 14,000 pg/g in samples SED4-1 and SED9-1, respectively, exceeded the MOE LEL of 10,000 pg/g (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). The calculated average concentration of TOC in the background sediment samples was 6,967 pg/g• Sediment Core Samples Concentrations of metals and inorganics exceeded the applicable comparison criteria as follows: • Manganese: Concentrations of manganese exceeded the applicable MOE LEL in sediment samples SED1-3 and SED2-3 (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). • Phosphorus: Concentrations of phosphorus exceeded the applicable MOE LEL in samples SED1-3, SED2-3, and SED3-2 (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). • Total Kieldahl Nitrogen (TKN): Concentrations of TKN exceeded the MOE LEL in samples SED1-3 and SED2-3 (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). • Total Organic Carbon (TOC): Concentrations of TOC exceeded the MOE LEL in samples SED1-3 and SED2-3 (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). Metals and inorganic concentrations from the analysed samples were not evaluated against background concentrations as background sediment core samples were not collected. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 55 pH: As shown in Table 11, seven surficial sediment samples (SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1, SED3-1, SED4-1, SED6-1, and SED9-1), three deep sediment samples (SED1-3, SED2-3, and SED3-2) and three background sediment samples (SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1) were submitted for laboratory analysis of pH The pH values ranged from 7.12 (SED1-1 and SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1)) to 7.75 (SED3-2). Organochlorine Pesticides: As shown in Table 12, four surficial sediment samples (SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1, and SED3-1), three deep sediment samples (SED1-3, SED2-3, and SED3-2) and three background sediment samples (SED5-1, SED7-1, and SED8-1) were submitted for laboratory analysis of OCPs. Concentrations of metal and inorganic parameters exceeding the applicable comparison criteria are described below. Sediment Surficial Samples Concentrations of OCPs exceeded the applicable comparison criteria as follows: • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, ap (p,W-DDD): A p,p'-DDD concentration of 0.0090 pg/g from sample SED1-1 exceeded the MOE LEL of 0.008 pg/g in sample SED1-1 (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). The concentration of p,p' DDD in the sediment background samples was less than the laboratory RDL of 0.0020 pg/g. • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, (total) (o,p' + ap'-DDD): Concentrations of Total DDD ranging from 0.0040 pg/g to 0.012 pg/g in samples SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), and SED3-1 exceeded the CCME ISQG of 0.00354 pg/g. Concentrations of Total DDD also exceeded the CCME Probable Effect Level (PEL) of 0.00851 pg/g in samples SED1-1 and SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1- 1). The concentration of Total DDD in the sediment background samples was less than the laboratory RDL of 0.0020 pg/g. • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, p,p' (,g,p'-DDE Concentrations of p,p'-DDE ranging from 0.0050 to 0.019 in samples SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), and SED3-1 exceeded the MOE LEL of 0.0050 (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). The concentration of p,p'-DDE in the sediment background samples was less than the laboratory RDL of 0.0020 pg/g. • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, (total) (o,p'- + p,p'-DDE Concentrations of Total DDE ranging from 0.0040 pg/g to 0.019 pg/g in samples SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1, and SED3-1 exceeded the CCME ISQG of 0.00142 pg/g. Concentrations of Total DDE also exceeded the CCME PEL of 0.00675 pg/g in samples SED1-1 and SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1). The concentration of Total DDE in the sediment background samples was less than the laboratory RDL of 0.0020 pg/g. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 56 • Total DDT. Concentrations of Total DDT ranging from 0.0040 pg/g to 0.034 pg/g in samples SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), SED2-1 and SED3-1 exceeded the CCME ISQG of 0.00119 pg/g. Concentrations of Total DDT also exceeded the CCME PEL of 0.00477 pg/g in samples SED1-1, SED10-1 (field duplicate of SED1-1), and SED1-3. The concentration of Total DDT in the sediment background samples was less than the laboratory RDL of 0.0020 pg/g. Sediment Core Samples Concentrations of OCPs exceeded the applicable comparison criteria as follows: • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, ap (p,p'-DDD): Concentrations of p,p'-DDD exceeded the MOE LEL in samples SED1-3 and SED2-3 (no CCME is provided for this parameter). • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, (total) (o,p' + p,p'-DDD): Concentrations of Total DDD exceeded the CCME ISQG and CCME PEL in samples SED1-3 and SED2- 3. • Dichlorofthenyldichloroethylene, p,p' (p,p'-DDE): Concentrations of p,p' DDE exceeded the MOE LEL in samples SED1-3 and SED2-3 (no CCME ISQG is provided for this parameter). • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, (total) (o,p'- + p,p'-DDE): Concentrations of Total DDE exceeded the CCME ISQG and CCME PEL in samples SED1-3 and SED2-3. • Total DDT. Concentrations of Total DDT exceeded the CCME ISQG and CCME PEL SED1-3 and SED2-3. Organochlorine pesticide concentrations from the analysed samples were not evaluated against background concentrations as background sediment core samples were not collected. Polychlorinated Biphenyls: As shown in Table 12, 10 sediment samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of PCBs. Concentrations of PCBs in the 10 samples did not exceed the applicable comparison criteria. Grain Size: Three representative sediment samples were submitted for grain size distribution analysis to determine the distribution of particle sizes in the material encountered at the subject site, particularly the percentage of particles equal to or larger than 75 pm in diameter. As shown on the Laboratory Certificate of Analysis included in Appendix XIII, the results of the sieve analysis for sediment sample SED6-1 indicated that greater than 50% by mass of the particles are 75 pm or larger in diameter. The results of the sieve analysis for sediment samples SED2-2 and SED9-1 indicated that less than 50% by mass of the particles are 75 pm or larger in diameter. Based on this TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 57 result, the on-site sediments are considered medium- and fine -textured with respect to the CCME (and MOE) definition. 5.3.3 SOIL WASTE CHARACTERIZATION Excess soil cuttings or sediment from the drilling and sediment sampling activities were not generated. As result, waste classification analysis of the soil and sediment for the purpose of disposal was not required. 5.3.4 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Laboratory results for the groundwater samples submitted to Maxxam for analysis are presented in Tables 13 to 16. Copies of the Laboratory Certificates of Analysis for the analyzed groundwater samples are included in Appendix XIII. Refer to Figure 6 for a graphic summary of the exceedances of the FIGQGs and CCME CWQG-PAL (FW) (for sampling locations within 10 m of a surface water body). Petroleum Hydrocarbons: As shown in Table 13, four groundwater samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of BTEX and PHCs F1 to F4. In addition, a field blank and a trip blank were submitted for laboratory analysis of BTEX and PHCs F1 to F4. Concentrations of BTEX and PHC F1 to F4 parameters in all samples (including the field blank and trip) were less than the laboratory RDLs, and therefore did not exceed the applicable Environment Canada FIGQGs, CCME CWQGs- PAL (FW) or MOE Table 9 Standards (for parameters for which the federal documents do not provide guidelines). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: As shown in Table 14, four groundwater samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of PAHs. Concentrations of PAHs in the four samples were less than the laboratory RDLs, and therefore did not exceed the applicable Environment Canada FIGQGs, CCME CWQGs- PAL (FW) or MOE Table 9 Standards (for parameters for which the federal documents do not provide guidelines). Metals: As shown in Table 15, four groundwater samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of metals. Concentrations of metal parameters exceeded the applicable comparison criteria in the four groundwater samples, as described below: • Arsenic: The concentration of arsenic exceeded the applicable Environment Canada FIGQG and CCME CWQG-PAL (FW) in sample MW102. • Iron: Concentrations of iron exceeded the applicable Environment Canada FIGQG and the CCME CWQG-PAL (FW) in samples MW101, MW102, MW103 and MW 104 (field duplicate of MW 103). TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 58 pH: As shown in Table 15, four groundwater samples (including one field duplicate) were submitted for laboratory analysis of pH. The pH values reported for the four groundwater samples ranged from 6.89 (MW 103) to 7.30 (MW 101 and MW 102). 5.3.5 QA/QC RESULTS The Maxxam quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program consisted of the analysis of laboratory method duplicates, method blanks, matrix spikes, and surrogate recoveries. The QA/QC results reported on the Laboratory Certificates of Analysis were generally within acceptable ranges. Maxxam's QA/QC program resulted in the following: • Two soil samples (MW101-B and MW102-1E) contained elevated levels of acenaphthene and the RDLS were required to be raised. The laboratory diluted these samples to reduce matrix interference. • One soil sample (MW102-1E) contained elevated levels of acenapthylene and the RDLS were required to be raised. The laboratory diluted this sample to reduce matrix interference. • THE RDLs for PAH analyses were required to be raised for sediment sample SED4-1 because of high moisture content in the sample. • In three instances the recovery for acenaphthene in MW101-1B and MW102-1E and acenaphthylene in MW102-1E was above the upper control limit in soil. This may represent a high bias for this specific analyte in soil. However, as all concentrations of all three parameters were below the laboratory RDLs, the data are considered acceptable. • In one instance the matrix spike recovery was above the upper control limit for p,p'-DDE in soil. This may represent a high bias in some results for this specific analyte in soil. However, there are no comparison criteria for this parameter, and all results for total DDE were less than the comparison criteria. Therefore the data are considered acceptable. • In one instance recovery matrix spike was not calculated for benzo(a)anthracene in soil. Due to the high concentration of this analyte in the parent sample, the relative percent difference (RPD) between the spiked and unspiked concentrations is not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. • In one instance the laboratory duplicate result (for benzo(a)anthracene in soil) exceeded RPD acceptance criteria. The variability in the results for this analyte may be more pronounced, however, as the reported results in all soil samples was less than 10x the applicable comparison criteria, the potential variability is not expected to affect the acceptability of the data. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 59 • In two instances the matrix spike recovery was below the lower control limit for Chromium VI in soil. This may be due in part to the reducing environment of the samples. This may result in a low bias in some results for this specific analyte. However all reported laboratory results were less than the RDL and therefore the potential bias is not expected to affect the acceptability of the data. • In one instance the matrix spike recovery was not calculated for p,p'-DDE in sediment. Due to the high concentration of this analyte in the parent sample, the RPD between the spiked and unspiked concentrations is not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. • In one instance the matrix spike recovery for p,p'-DDT was outside control limits (above the upper limit). This may represent a high bias in some results for this specific analyte, however, for laboratory results of p,p'-DDT below the RDL, this potential bias has no impact. The overall quality control for this analysis meets acceptability criteria. • In one instance the matrix spike recovery for Chromium VI in sediment was outside the control limits (below the lower limit). This may be due in part to the reducing environment of the sample, however, the overall quality control for this analysis meets acceptability criteria. • TKN<NH4 for sediment sample SED3-2. Both values fall within acceptable RPD limits for duplicates and are likely equivalent and are considered acceptable. • Matrix interferences in two sediment samples (SED1-3 and SED2-3) for OCPs analysis were noted. The laboratory diluted these samples to reduce matrix interference. • Detection of matrix spike exceeding laboratory acceptance criteria for zirconium in groundwater sample MW101. Reanalysis yields similar results (Recovery 135%, limits 80-120%). In this case, the data was considered acceptable based on other quality control data. As a result, the concentration of zirconium reported in groundwater sample MW101 may be biased high. In this case, the data was considered acceptable based on other quality control data. The Terrapex QA/QC program consisted of four field duplicate soil samples, one field duplicate sediment sample, one field duplicate groundwater sample, one field blank, and one trip blank. In general, relatively good correlation was observed between the analytical results for the field duplicates and the corresponding soil, sediment and groundwater samples. Generally, good correlation was noted between the soil samples MW 101-3, MW 102-1 B, MW 102-1 C, and MW 102-1 A and their analytical pairs MW101-6, MW 102-1 E, MW 102-1 F, and MW 102-1 D, respectively. Any variances were considered attributable to sample heterogeneity. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 60 Generally, good correlation was noted between the sediment sample SED1-1 and its corresponding analytical pair SED10-1. Any variances were considered attributable to sample heterogeneity. Generally, good correlation was noted between the groundwater sample MW103 and its corresponding analytical pair MW 104. Any variances were considered to be acceptable. Concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon parameters in the field blank and trip blank samples were below the reported laboratory RDLs. On the basis of the above, the laboratory and field QA/QC results for this work program are considered acceptable. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 61 6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Terrapex investigated the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour to identify actual and potential site contamination through a Phase I ESA. A total of three APECs (one on-site APEC and two off- site APECs) were identified during the Phase I ESA component (refer to Table 1) as follows: • APEC 1 comprises the Port Burwell SCH water lots and land area west of Big Otter Creek and included two Contaminated Sites (CS), FCSI 00012785 and FCSI 00012786, previously assigned to the site based on the findings of the MacViro 2001 Report; and, • APECs 2 and 3 are located on adjacent properties to the west and east of APEC 1, respectively. A Phase II ESA was completed at the site to confirm the presence or absence of COPCs associated with the APECs/CSs including investigation of the soil, groundwater, and sediment conditions at the site. 6.1 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER Soil and groundwater COPCs have been identified at APEC 1 (portions of land and infilled harbour areas west of the harbour water lot). While the source of impacts identified at APEC 1 do not appear to be associated with the current DFO operations at the site, APEC 2 represents a potential offsite source of contamination due to the historical handling and storage of bulk fuel, coal, potash, fertilizers, and other industrial commodities, as well as two ASTs currently located at APEC 2 (Port Burwell Harbour Facility west of the site), and one AST currently located at the Bradfield Marina upstream and northwest of the site, south of Bridge Street. In addition, dredgate removed from the inner harbour and used as fill on the land-based portions of APEC 1 could represent a potential source of impact. Soil and groundwater impacts identified at APEC 1 are as follows: • a concentration of PHC F2 exceeded the applicable CCME CWS Tier 2 Level in one soil sample collected from MW102 (located within 10 m of Big Otter Creek) at a depth of 4.6 m bgs; vertical delineation has not been achieved at this location; • concentrations of PAH parameters exceeded the CCME SQG in three soil samples (including the field duplicate) collected from MW101 and MW102 at depths ranging from near surface to 0.4 m bgs; vertical delineation has not been achieved at these locations; and, • concentrations of arsenic exceeded the applicable CCME CWQG-PAL (FW) in one groundwater sample (MW102) and concentrations of iron exceeded the applicable Environment Canada FIGQGs or CCME CWQG-PAL (FW) in three groundwater samples (MW101, MW102, and MW103). TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 62 Note that the Environment Canada FIGQG and CCME CWQG-PAL (FW) for arsenic (5 jag/L) is below the typical background concentration of 13 fag/L in Ontario, as described in Table 1 of the MOE Standards. As the concentration of arsenic at this location does not exceed the MOE Table 1 Standard, it will not be considered an exceedance when determining the extent of impacts. (This concentration should still be considered when developing a risk management approach). Note that the elevated concentrations of iron detected in the groundwater at the site is likely naturally occurring, as this parameter is naturally present in groundwater across Ontario. Typically, excessive concentrations of iron produce undesirable tastes and colours in drinking water, as well as staining, precipitates, and microbial growths. As groundwater at the site is not used as drinking water, and the elevated concentration of this parameter does not appear to be associated with any potential sources of contamination, the exceedence of the applicable federal guidelines is not considered a significant environmental concern with respect to the objectives of the current study. (This concentration should still be considered when developing a risk management approach). 6.2 SEDIMENT Sediment impacts have been identified within the water lot portions of APEC 1 (portion of Big Otter Creek and inner harbour of the Port Burwell SCH). While the source of impacts at APEC 1 do not appear to be associated with the current DFO operations at the site, APEC 2 and APEC 3 represent potential offsite sources of contamination due to the historical handling and storage of bulk fuel, coal, potash, fertilizers, and other industrial commodities, as well as the current handling and storage of fuel at the marina upstream of the site. Sediment impacts identified at APEC 1 are as follows: • concentrations of PAH parameters exceeded the CCME ISQG or MOE LEL in one sediment core sample collected from SED2; • concentrations of one or more of manganese, phosphorus, TKN, and TOC exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG or MOE LEL in six sediment surficial samples (including one field duplicate) collected from SED1, SED2, SED3, SED4, and SED9 and three sediment core samples collected from SED1, SED2, and SED3; • concentrations of one or more of PHC F3 and F4 in five sediment samples (including one field duplicate) collected from SED1, SED4, SED6, and SED9 were greater than 20% above the corresponding calculated background concentration; a CCME ISQG or a MOE LEL are not provided for these petroleum hydrocarbon parameters; and, • Concentrations of one or more of p,p' DDD, o,p' + p,p' DDD, p,p' DDE, o,p' + p,p' DDE, and total DDT exceeded the applicable CCME ISQG/PEL, or MOE LEL, in TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 63 three sediment surficial samples collected from SED1, SED2, and SED3 and two sediment core samples collected from SED1 and SED2. As noted in Section 5.3.2, only the phosphorus concentrations reported at SED1, SED2, SED3, SED4, and SED9 was not greater than 20% above the calculated background concentration (average concentration reported at SED5, SED7, and SED8). Therefore, phosphorus will not be considered an exceedance when determining the extent of impacts. (This concentration should still be considered when developing a risk management approach). Based on guidance provided under Step 3: Initial Testing Program of the SLRA provided in the FCSAP Framework, APEC 1 (portion of Big Otter Creek and inner harbour of the Port Burwell SCH) was identified as a suspected aquatic site as the following conditions were met: • sediment impacts at APEC 1 exceeded the applicable CCME ISQGs, or MOE LEL where CCME ISQG do not exist, for one or more of PAHs, Metals/Inorganics, and OCPs; • biomagnification of sediment impacts can occur (OCP parameters, DDT and its breakdown products DDD and DDE); and, • concentrations of the identified exceedances for PAHs, Metals/Inorganics, and OCPs were greater than 20% above the concentrations of the analysed parameters from the background sediment samples. Based on the above, APEC 1 would be considered contaminated under the FCSAP Framework and listed as a 'potential risk; further assessment required'. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 64 7.0 CONTAMINATED SITE SUMMARY Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA, APEC 1 (portions of land and infilled harbour areas west of the harbour water lot) was identified as a Contaminated Site and assigned the Contaminated Site number CS0001. Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA, APEC 1 (portion of Big Otter Creek and inner harbour of the Port Burwell SCH) was identified as a Contaminated Site and assigned the site identifier CS0002. The two previously identified Contaminated Sites FCSI 00012785 and FCSI 00012786 were also incorporated into CS0002. The location of CS0001 and CS0002 are shown on Figure 8. A summary of the contaminated sites are included in Table 17. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 C13664.00 65 8.0 PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Terrapex developed a preliminary Conceptual Site Model (CSM), based on the information provided in the previous environmental reports and the current investigation, of the identified impacts at the Contaminated Sites CS0001 and CS0002 at Port Burwell SCH. A summary of the inputs to the CSM is provided below and the CSM, including cross-sections, are presented on Figures 9, 10A and 10B. Site Overview: Port Burwell SCH encompasses most of the downstream portion of Big Otter Creek where the creek meets the north shore of Lake Erie, and a portion of Lake Erie in Port Burwell, Ontario. The subject site comprises an area of approximately 78.27 ha, but primarily comprises water lots. It is located at the south end of the Village of Port Burwell. One structure is currently present on the subject site, the former Coast Guard automation building. The local topography is generally flat with a slight slope towards Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie. Regional topography increases in elevation to the north away from the shoreline of Lake Erie. The land portions of the subject site were generally grass covered with some vegetated (brush) and treed areas along the western and eastern riverbanks of Big Otter Creek. The closest significant water bodies to the site are the downstream portion of Big Otter Creek which drains into Lake Erie. Geology and Hydrogeo/ogy: The generalized stratigraphy encountered at boreholes MW101 and 102 consisted of sod and topsoil with varying amounts of organic material (plants, roots) to a depth of approximately 0.15 m bg, underlain by predominately medium to fine sand to the full depth of the investigation (7.5 m bg). At MW103, the topsoil was underlain by medium to fine sand to 1.5 m bg. Beneath the sand, sandy silt with trace seashell fragments was encountered to 7.6 m bg. Bedrock was not encountered during the investigation. The depth to groundwater from grade ranged from a minimum of 0.94 m in MW103 to a maximum of 1.48 m in MW101 and MW102. The static groundwater table elevations relative to the TBM ranged from a maximum of 97.44 m in MW101 to a minimum of 97.13 m in MW102. Stratigraphy encountered in the sediment cores advanced in Big Otter Creek consisted of silt with trace sand and/or clay that extended to depths of 5.2 m bws at SED 1 to sandy silt with trace clay that extended to 5.2 m bws and 4.6 m bws at SED2 and SED3, respectively. At SED1 and SED2, clayey silt was encountered to the maximum core depth of 7.6 m bws. At SED3, sand with some silt was encountered to the maximum core depth of 6.1 m bws. Sea shell fragments were noted in SED1 from 3.1 m to 5.2 m bws in SED1 and 5.2 m to 7.6 m bws in SED2. Fine sand with varying amounts of silt was encountered in surface sediment samples SED6 to SED8. Sandy silt was encountered in surface sediment samples SED5 and SED9. Silt, with PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 66 some sand with trace organics (roots, leaves) was encountered in surface sediment sample SED4. Climatic Conditions: The nearest weather reporting station is located in the city of Tillsonburg, approximately 25 km northeast of Port Burwell. Based on Environment Canada "Canadian Climate Normals 1971--2000" data in Tillsonburg, the mean annual precipitation is approximately 882 mm, and mean annual snowfall is approximately 128 cm. Assessment Criteria: The federal guidelines and standards developed by the CCME and Environment Canada are applicable. Parameters for which the federal documents do not provide guidelines or standards are compared to the appropriate provincial site condition standards developed by the MOE. The comparison criteria are discussed in detail in section 5.2. Extent of Contamination: Soil, sediment and groundwater with concentrations of COCs exceeding the applicable CCME or MOE guideline or standard were identified at CS0001 and CS0002. Based on the analytical results, soil, sediment, and groundwater impacts have only been partially delineated. COCs and Distribution of Contamination: Contaminants of Concern: COCs within the soil, sediment, and groundwater at the site are PHCs, PAHs, TOC, TKN, metals, and OCPs as follows: • CS0001: CS0001 comprises portions of land and infilled areas of the harbour west of the Port Burwell SCH water lot. COCs in soil at CS0001 include PHCs (PHC F2) and PAHs (1-, 2-, 1- & 2- (total) methylnaphthalene, naphthalene, phenanthrene and IACR). The PHC F2 exceedance reported at CS0001 is approximately 4.6 to 6.1m bg and has been partially delineated to the north and east, however, vertical delineation has not been achieved. Fuel has historically been stored in a large capacity fuel oil AST on the adjacent property along Chatham Street (APEC 2, refer to Figure 2 and Figure 3) and currently in two ASTs on the Port Burwell Harbour Facility west of the site, and one AST at the Bradfield Marina upstream and northwest of the site, south of Bridge Street. The PAH exceedances reported in CS0001 are near surface (0.15 to 0.4 m) and have only been partially delineated to the east, however, vertical delineation has not been achieved. Historically, coal, potash, fertilizers, and other industrial commodities were stored and handled on the site and over Big Otter Creek during loading activities to boats and conveyors crossing the river, as well as the adjacent properties on both sides of Big Otter Creek. COCs in groundwater at CS0001 are metals, specifically iron exceedances at MW 101, MW 102, MW 103 and MW 104 (field duplicate of MW 103). The groundwater exceedances have not been delineated. • CS0002: CS0002 comprise portions of the Port Burwell SCH inner harbour water lots. COCs in the sediment at CS0002 are: • PAHs (benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, phenanthrene, pyrene); TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 67 • PHC F3 and F4; • metals/inorganics (manganese, TKN, TOC); and, • OCPs (p,p'-DDD, total DDD, p,p'-DDE, total DDE, total DDT) The impacts at CS0002 have only been partially delineated. Historically, coal, potash, fertilizers and other industrial commodities were stored and handled on the site and over Big Otter Creek during loading to boats and conveyors crossing the river, as well as the adjacent properties on both sides of Big Otter Creek. Migration Pathways: In general, potential preferential migration pathways for subsurface and surface contaminants at a site comprise fractured bedrock, buried utilities, naturally occurring sand/gravel seams, or other subsurface areas of increased permeability. The subsurface soil consisting of medium to fine grain sand (fill) would also be considered a potential pathway for contaminant migration. There is the potential that the outfall from the sewage plant on Chatham Street that drains into Big Otter Creek could affect contaminant migration pathways at the site, as well as the abandoned hydro lines from the now vacant Coast Guard automation building that housed diesel generators that provided power to the lighthouse on the south end of the property. Receptors and Exposure Summary: Potential human health exposures are related to direct contact to COCs within the soil, sediment, and groundwater such as dermal contact, incidental inhalation and incidental ingestion of contaminants (through direct contact with the soil or groundwater) or inhalation of contaminants (through soil vapour intrusion into indoor air in the automation building). Groundwater is not used as a potable source at the site or on surrounding properties. Human receptors for impacted soil at the site include people walking along river banks, accessing boats tied up to pier, and construction/remediation (i.e., short-term) workers. Similarly, ecological exposures are also related to direct contact with contaminants of concern. Potential ecological receptors include terrestrial plants and aquatic plants (root uptake via soil, groundwater, surface water, and sediment), soil and aquatic invertebrates (ingestion of soil, and sediment), small mammals, reptiles, fish, and birds (ingestion of soil, surface water, sediment and food). It should be noted that this analysis is preliminary and qualitative in nature. A more detailed assessment of potential adverse impacts to human health or ecological receptors is beyond the scope of this Phase II ESA. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 68 9.0 CONCLUSIONS The investigation reported herein was designed to confirm the presence of, and characterize, the contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) at areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) identified in the Phase I ESA component, through the completion of a Phase II ESA Investigation and to develop an effective site management strategy comprising remediation and/or risk management. Based on the review, evaluation, and interpretation of the information obtained from the Phase I ESA records review, interviews, and site reconnaissance, three APECs were identified as follows: • APEC 1: located on site comprising the Port Burwell SCH water lots and land area west of Big Otter Creek. • APEC 2: located off site comprising the surrounding properties immediately adjacent to the west of Port Burwell SCH. • APEC 3: located off site comprising the surrounding properties immediately adjacent to the east of Port Burwell SCH. Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA, as well as findings from previous investigations, the Phase II ESA investigated COPCs in soil, groundwater, and sediment at APEC 1. The findings are as follows: • Soil: Contaminants of Concern (CDCs) were identified in the soil on the study area at the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour at concentrations which exceeded the applicable comparison criteria for PHC F2, 1-, 2-, and 1- & 2- (total) methylnaphtalene, naphthalene, phenanthrene and IACR. • Sediment: COCs were identified in the sediment in the study area at the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour at concentrations which exceeded the applicable comparison criteria for benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, phenanthrene, pyrene, manganese, phosphorus, TKN, TOC, p,p' DDD, Total DDD, p,p'-DDE, Total DDE and Total DDT. Concentrations of PHC F3 and F4 in sediment were greater than 20% above the corresponding calculated background concentration; based on guidance provided in the framework from the MOE Guidelines, anthropogenic exposure is suggested where the concentrations of CDCs at the exposed sites are greater than 20% above the corresponding background concentrations. Note that while the concentrations of phosphorus in the surficial sediment samples exceeded the applicable CCME ISQGs, they were not greater than 20% above the calculated average concentration of phosphorus in the background sediment samples. As a result, phosphorus was not considered an exceedance when determining the extent of impacts. (This concentration should still be considered when developing a risk management approach). PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 69 • Groundwater: COCs were identified in the groundwater of the study area at the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour at concentrations which exceeded the applicable comparison criteria for arsenic and iron. It should be noted that the Environment Canada FIGQG and CCME CWQG-PAL (FW) for arsenic is below the typical background concentration in Ontario, as described in Table 1 of the MOE Standards. As the concentration of arsenic at this location does not exceed the MOE Table 1 Standard, it was not considered an exceedance when determining the extent of impacts. (This concentration should still be considered when developing a risk management approach). Note that the elevated concentrations of iron detected in the groundwater at the site is likely naturally occurring, as this parameter is naturally present in groundwater across Ontario. Typically, excessive concentrations of iron produce undesirable tastes and colours in drinking water, as well as staining, precipitates, and microbial growths. As groundwater at the site is not used as drinking water, and the elevated concentration of this parameter does not appear to be associated with any potential sources of contamination, the exceedence of the applicable federal guidelines is not considered a significant environmental concern with respect to the objectives of the current study. (This concentration should still be considered when developing a risk management approach). Based on the findings of the Phase II ESA, the land portions and infilled harbour areas within APEC 1 associated with the soil and groundwater impacts were assigned the contaminated site identifier CS0001. While the source of impacts identified at CS0001 do not appear to be associated with the current DFO operations at the site, APEC 2 represents a potential offsite source of contamination due to the historical handling and storage of bulk fuel, coal, potash, fertilizers, and other industrial commodities at this location, as well as the handling and storage of fuel at three ASTs currently located at APEC 2 (two ASTs at the Port Burwell Harbour Facility west of the site, and one AST located at the Bradfield Marina upstream and northwest of the site). In addition, dredgate removed from the inner harbour and used as fill on the land-based portions of CS0001 could represent a potential source of impact. The portion of the water lot associated with the sediment impacts at APEC 1 was assigned the contaminated site identifier CS0002. CS0002 also incorporated the two existing sediment contaminated sites, FCSI 00012785 and FCSI 00012786, previously assigned to the Port Burwell SCH. While the source of impacts identified at CS0002 do not appear to be associated with the current DFO operations at the site, APEC 2 and APEC 3 represent potential offsite sources of contamination due to the historical handling and storage of bulk fuel, coal, potash, fertilizers, and other industrial commodities, as well as the current handling and storage of fuel at the marina upstream of the site. PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 70 10.0 CLOSURE The environmental assessment described herein was conducted in accordance with the terms of reference for this project as agreed upon by Public Works and Government Services Canada, on behalf of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Terrapex Environmental Ltd., and to generally accepted engineering or environmental consulting practices in this area. The qualifications of the assessors are included in Appendix XIV. The reported information is believed to provide a reasonable representation of the general environmental conditions at the subject site at the time of the assessment, however, the data were collected at discrete locations and conditions may vary at other locations and with the passage of time. The assessment was also limited to a study of those chemical parameters specifically addressed in this report. In assessing the environmental conditions and history of the site, Terrapex Environmental Ltd. has relied in good faith on information provided by others, as noted in this report, and has assumed the information provided to our firm is factual and accurate. Terrapex Environmental Ltd. accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatement, or inaccuracy in this report resulting from the information provided by others. Further, Terrapex Environmental Ltd. shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the assessment was conducted. This report has been prepared for the sole use of Public Works and Government Services Canada, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Terrapex Environmental Ltd. accepts no liability for claims arising from the use of this report, or from actions taken or decisions made as a result of this report, by parties other than Public Works and Government Services Canada, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. TERRAPEX ENVIROWENTAL LTD. Rcqmond Ayuen, A. c.T. Senior Environmental Technologist QPpFE€3yn., Mio ael Osborne, S.Sd.,,R.ErJva,dE � g ' ' :b Senior Project Man a eh4 c Or O�SM TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. Geof ussier, Dipl. Project Manager PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 CB664.00 71 11.0 REFERENCES Barnett, P.J. 1983. Quarternary Geology of the Port Burwell Area, Southern Ontario Geological Survey. Map P 2624. Geological Series -Preliminary Map. Scale 1:50,000 (Geology 1982-1983); Barnett, P.J. 1993. Quarternary Geology of the Long Point -Port Burwell Area,Ontario Geological Survey. Open File Report 5873, page 212 (Figures 2 and 3); Barnett, P.J., Cowan, W.R. and Henry, A.P. 1991. Quarternary Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet; Ontario Geological Survey (OGS), Map 2556, scale 1:1,000,000; Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (CEQGs, 1999, updated 2012); CCME CEQG Chapter 4 - Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CWQG-PAL) for Freshwater (FW) provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table (http://st-ts. ccme. ca/); CCME CEQG Chapter 6 — Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table (http://st-ts.ccme.ca/); CCME CEQG Chapter 7 - Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health (SQGs) for coarse-grained surface soils in a commercial land use provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table (http://st-ts.ccme.ca/); CCME Guidance Manual on Sampling, Analysis, and Data Management for Contaminated Sites, Volumes I and //(December 1993); CCME 1993 Guidance Manual, the Environment Canada -Ontario Region TAB #5 Sampling & Analysis of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater; CCME Canada -Wide Standards (CWS) for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in soil — Technical Supplement (January 2008); CCME National Classification System for Contaminated Sites (NCSCS, 2008, updated 2010, version 1.2); Directory of Federal Real Property (DFRP) website (www.tbs-sct.gc.ca). Ecolog ERIS, Ontario Base Mapping (OBM), Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). Environment Canada -Ontario Region Technical Assistance Bulletin (TAB) for federal facilities operating in Ontario entitled TAB #4 Sampling & Analysis of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil; Environment Canada Canadian Wildlife Service website (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/defaul e.cfm); Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines (FIGQGs) presented in the Environment Canada Guidance Document on Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Federal Contaminated Sites (May 2010, updated November 2012); Golder Associates Framework for Addressing and Managing Aquatic Contaminated Sites Under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) (May 13, 2010); Land Information Ontario (LIO) website (http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/LIO/index.html); PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 72 MacViro Consultants Ltd., Enhanced Phase I Site Assessment, Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Site No. 4766, (March 2001); Municipality of Bayham website: www.bayham.on.ca; MNR, Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC), Ontario's Biodiversity: Species at Risk website (www.rom.on.ca/ontario/risk/php; Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN), Centre for Topographic Information, Sheet 40110; MOE Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE) Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario (December 1996); Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) Statement of Work For Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Terms of Reference (TOR) Module Phase I/ll Environmental Site Assessment (updated: May 2012); R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 362 (Waste Management — PCB's), made under the Environmental Protection Act. Schedule 4 of Revised Regulation of Ontario (R.R.O.) 1990, Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), made under the Environmental Protection Act, Revised Statutes of Ontario (R.S.O.) 1990, c. E.19; Stantec Consulting Ltd., Assessment of Environmental Risks for Municipality of Bayham at Port Burwell (March, 2012); Stantec Consulting Ltd., Assessment of Environmental Risks for Municipality of Bayham at Port Burwell (March, 2012); and, United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Low Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground - Water Sampling Procedures (April 1996). PWGSC Project No. R. 059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 73 FIGURES CI ICNT SITE L O CA TION Public and TERRAPER Government Services Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Canada PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO Sprin9f [d sr _ € LI E..._..taUTt cn cOi4 LfN 30r 35 e� r a � 5 Cp l ij 11 IIGI' i LLJ r 1': 44 E 111V 19 ; . �. c�`, Cd IX G JUCOLIN LINK. € fir: i,4� Rt, r?. y i e �7 C . r e w gTf9ATE � l s` t 1� � f w ringe 1 .:. W 1 i LL.LYILL I� ,. !ti r, ., I x f--„ - ` � •-' S. '.i'' S•,. w _ 45 d aLr LINE y'�k ��'t ,a r�1N��'ar 4 LL- RichMon lees e ® }.... 43 villa F_ Gen 21 ire fLM 01 �FutrEs 55 26 f� In TOge4 9 23 g Ca i#dR , 45 o nor a o E 45 LLr am P �•„�( O;LI i '•� EE I or 40 ,c I io s nruves' d few r VI�nn }_ ' a ,ary . 28 NnvA SOOTIA . j `k 55 ; 28 I p-' L' 42 t� 011th 3lo ra 54,E o PORT BURW �LL�' � � Q PROVINCIALPAf�I{ Poi o LAKE ERIE SOURCE: RAND McNALLY ONTARIO PROVINCIAL ROAD ATLAS, P.8. Hem C Houghton PROJECT# CB664.00 DATE DECEMBER 2012 DRAWN SF CHECKED GLL DRAWING# FIGURE 1 �TERRAPEX APEC LOCATIONS CLIENT Public Works and Government Services Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Canada PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO N Ar- --I - - FORMER ROUNDHOUSE 1� APE cx BPITT STREET e G7 BROCK STREET C� ( � _ 141 IL FORMER FUEL OIL TANK' t FCSI 000012786 - 2 EXISTING ABOVE GROUND FUELSTORAGE TANKS (ASTs) FCSI 000012785 - I AUTOMATION BUILDING o APEC 1 KE RIE j i 0 200m 400m LEGEND PROJECT# CB664.00 SCALE AS SHOWN ® AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN APEC (APPROXIMATE) NOTE: APEC LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES, THESE ARE DATE MARCH 2013 DRAWN CHECKED APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AND DO NOT REPRESENT AREA OF STORAGE / OPERATIONS. SF GLL — PROJECT AREA SOURCE: GOGGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. DRAWING# FIGURE 2 it--. TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. N _ dit GENERAL SITE LAYOUT SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO �w W�01�O - S D 1' - a;1 � ® Ar a 2 EXISTING ABOVE GROUND MW1® ED2 + FUELSTORAGE TANKS (ASTs) AUTOMATION BUILDING MW1o�o ®S D3 7A- kq,- LAKE ERIE LEGEND CROSS SECTION PLAN (SEE FIGURE 9A AND 9B) MONITORING WELL SURFICIAL SEDIMENT / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION -i DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. SED5 Public Works and Government Services Canada I CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 3 5 CLIENT TERRAPEX SOIL EXCEEDANCES ,, Public Works and Government Services Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Canada PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO ;- 171 2 EXISTING - 0.4m) ABOVE GROUND MW1C FUELSTORAGE CONCENTRATION TANKS (ASTs) MOE TABLE 9 AUTOMATION BUILDING- o MW103® LEGEND 0 GREATER THAN STANDARDS MONITORING WELL . SURFICIAL SEDIMENT / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION ® DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS CCME GUIDELINES BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS MOE TABLE 9 STANDARDS NOTE: 1. CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT (CCME) CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GUIDELINES (1999, UPDATED 2012); CHAPTER 7 CANADIAN SOIL QUALITY GUIDELINES (SAGS) FOR THE PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND HUMAN HEALTH PROVIDED IN THE ON-LINE CCME CEQG SUMMARY TABLE FOR COARSE-GRAINED SURFACE SOILS IN A COMMERCIAL LAND USE 2. MOE SOIL, GROUND WATER AND SEDIMENT STANDARDS FOR USE UNDER PART XV.1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (APRIL 15,2011); TABLE 9 GENERIC SOIL STANDARDS FOR USE WITHIN 30m OF A WATER BODY IN A NON -POTABLE GROUNDWATER CONDITION FOR COARSE TEXTURED SOIL IN A RESIDENTIAL/PARKLAND/INSTITUTIONAL/INDUSTRIAL/ COMMERCIAL/COMMUNITY PROPERTY USE 3. INDEX OF ADDITIVE CANCER RISK; ASSESSES POTENTIAL THREATS TO POTABLE GROUNDWATER WATER QUALITY FROM LEACHING OF CARCINOGENIC PAH MIXTURES FROM SOIL 4.CCME CANADA -WIDE STANDARDS FOR PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHC) IN SOIL - TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT (JANUARY 2008); CALCULATED TIER 2 LEVELS FOR COARSE-GRAINED SURFACE SOILS IN A COMMERCIAL LAND USE PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER FOR FRESHWATER AQUATIC LIFE EXPOURE PATHWAY FOR PHC F1 AND PHC F2; ECO SOIL CONTACT EXPOSURE PATHWAY FOR PHC F3, AND PHC F4; APPLICABLE TO SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN 10 M OF A SURFACE WATER BODY I. D2 5 r- MW101-1 B (0.3 - 0.4m) CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION CCME SOIL MOE TABLE 9 - PAHs pg/g GUIDELINES 1 (pg/g) STANDARDS 2 (p • Naphthalene Phenanthrene NS 0.16 0.32 0.013 0.046 0.09 0.69 iSED5 MW102-1 B (0.15 - 0.3m) CONCENTRATION CCME SOIL MOE TABLE 9 PAHs pg/g GUIDELINES' (pg/g) STANDARDS 2 (pg/g) Methylnaphthalene,1- 2.3 NS 0.59 Methylnaphthalene,2- 2.7 NS 0.59 Methylnaphthalene,1-&2-(TOTAL) 5.1 NS 0.59 Naphthalene 1.3 0.013 0.09 Phenanthrene 1.8 0.046 0.69 IACR a 2.04 1.0 NS MW102-1E (DUPLICATE OF MW102-1 B) CONCENTRATION CCME SOIL MOE TABLE 9 PAHs pg/g GUIDELINES 1 (pg/g) STANDARDS 2 (pg/g) Methylnaphthalene,1- 0.80 NS 0.59 Methylnaphthalene,2- 1.2 NS 0.59 Methylnaphthalene,1-&2-(TOTAL) 2.0 NS 0.59 Naphthalene 0.56 0.013 0.09 Phenanthrene 0.58 0.046 0.69 MW102-4 (4.6-6.1m) CONCENTRATION CCME SOIL MOE TABLE 9 PHCs pg/g GUIDELINES ° (pg/g) STANDARDS 2 (pg/g) F2 20 5.3 10 LAKE ERIE 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 4 I— SEDIMENT EXCEEDANCES - CLIENT �TERRAPEX PHCs, PAHs, METALS, NUTRIENTS ,44 Public Works and / Canada Government Services Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL. ONTARIO 0 SED9-1 (1.0 - 1.1 m) SED4-1 (1.5 CONCENTRATION s PHCs (p9/g) F3 24 SED1-1 (1.0 SED4-1 (1.5 - 1.6m CONCENTRATION s PHCs (pg/g) METALS 180 F4 PHOSPHORUS SED10-1 (DUPLICATE) 4� F3 CONCENTRATION' E011 NUTRIENTS (pg/g) TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGE TOTAL N 2,000 CONCENTRATION SED9-1 (1.0 - 1.1 m T MOE SEDIMENT METALS GUIDELINES' (ISQG MANGANESE GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) PHOSPHORUS (mg/kg) q NUTRIENTS (pg/g) SED1-1 (1.0 - 1.1 m) < CCME SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION s PHCs (pg/g) F3 180 F4 GUIDELINES 2 (SE SED10-1 (DUPLICATE) 4� F3 CONCENTRATION' E011 PHCs (pg/g) F3 180 _ 2 EXISTING ABOVE GROUND MW1 ED2 FUELSTORAGE TANKS (ASTs) MATION BUILDING o -S D MW103 SED6-1 (1.0 - 1.1 m) CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION' MOE SEDIMENT PHCs (pg/g) GUIDELINES ' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SE GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) (pg/g) F3 53 (pg/g) 670 I C!'_CAlfl 0 GREATER THAN STANDARDS MONITORING WELL SURFICIAL SEDIMENT / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS CCME GUIDELINES BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS MOE SEDIMENT STANDARDS NOTE: 1. CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT (CCME) CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GUIDELINES (1999, UPDATED 2012); CHAPTER 6 CANADIAN SEDIMENT QUALITY GUIDELINES (SAGS) FOR THE PROTECTION OF AQUATIC LIFE FOR FRESHWATER PROVIDED IN THE ON-LINE CCME CEQG SUMMARY TABLE; INTERIM SEDIMENT QUALITY GUIDELINES (ISQGS) AND PROBABLE EFFECT LEVELS (PELS) 2. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT (MOE) GUIDELINE FOR IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING AND MANAGING CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS IN ONTARIO: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH (MAY 2008); LOWEST EFFECT LEVELS (LELS) AND SEVERE EFFECT LEVELS (SELS); TABLE 1: PROVINCIAL SEDIMENT QUALITY GUIDELINES (PSQGS) FOR METALS AND NUTRIENTS 3. SAMPLE IS GREATER THAN 20% OF THE REFERENCE CONCENTRATION (NO CCME ISQGS OR MOE LEL) TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGE CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES ' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SE GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) 670 NS NS" 600 2,000 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT T MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG EL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SE (mg/kg) GUIDELINES 1 (ISQG (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) 784 NS NS 550 4,800 12,000 NS NS 10,000 100,000 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SE GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) 560 NS NS 460 1,100 810 NS NS 600 2,000 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT T MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES 1 (ISQG EL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SE (mg/kg) GUIDELINES ' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) (pg/g (pg/g (pg/g ) 802 NS NS 550 4,800 14,000 NS NS 10,000 100,000 SED1-1 (3.0-4.5m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS PHOSPHORUS (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) PHOSPHORUS 750 NS NS 600 2,000 SED10-1 (DUPLICATE OF SED1-1) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES ' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS PAHs (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) PHOSPHORUS 770 NS NS 600 2,000 SED 1-3 (6.0 - 7.5m) Benzo[a]pyrene 0.034 0.0319 0.782 0.370 1,440 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT 950 (pg/g) GUIDELINES 1 (ISQG) GUIDELINES 1 (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS Acenapthylene (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) MANGANESE 540 NS NS 460 1,100 PHOSPHORUS 960 NS NS 600 2,000 GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES 1 (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) NUTRIENTS (mg/kg) (pg/g(pg/g (pg/g (pg/g ) TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN (TKN) 1,490 NS NS 550 4,800 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 14,000 NS NS 10,000 100,000 SED2-1 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) (pg/g) GUIDELINES ' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS PHOSPHORUS (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) PHOSPHORUS 620 NS NS 600 2,000 SED2-3 (6.0 - 7.5m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES ' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) PAHs (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) Benzo[a]anthracene 0.045 0.0317 0.385 0.320 1,480 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.034 0.0319 0.782 0.370 1,440 Phenanthrene 0.066 0.0419 0.515 0.560 950 Pyrene 0.086 0.053 0.875 0.490 850 Acenapthylene 0.0080 0.00587 0.128 NS NS CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES ' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) Manganese 590 NS NS 460 1,100 Phosphorus 860 NS NS 600 2,000 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/9) GUIDELINES ' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) NUTRIENTS (mg/kg) (pg/g(pg/g (pg/g (pg/g ) TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN (TKN) 1,010 NS NS 550 4,800 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC) 12,000 NS NS 10,000 100,000 SED3-1 (3.7 - 4.6m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES ' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS PHOSPHORUS (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) 640 NS NS 600 2,000 PHOSPHORUS SED3-2 (4.6 - 6.0m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES ' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) 670 NS NS 600 2,000 PHOSPHORUS SED8 SED8-1 (3.0 - 3.1 m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES 1 (ISQG) GUIDELINES 1 (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) PHOSPHORUS 850 NS NS 600 2,000 SED7-1 (1.0 - 1.1 m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES 1 (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) METALS (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) PHOSPHORUS 1,600 NS NS 600 2,000 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 5A TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. 0 2 EXISTING ABOVE GROUND FUELSTORAGE TANKS (ASTs) SEDIMENT EXCEEDANCES - ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO W101 D1 MW1�2,,, •JED2 IAATION BUILDING o M W 103,_ , , Public S and GovernmentmentServices Canada SED1-1 (3.0 - 4.5m) SED6 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT ORGANOCHLORINE (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) PESTICIDES (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) P,P'- (P,P'-DDD) 0.0090 NS NS 0.008 6 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDD) 0.012 0.00354 0.00851 NS NS P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) 0.019 NS NS 0.005 19 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDE) 0.019 0.00142 0.00675 NS NS DDT (TOTAL) 0.0340 0.00119 0.00477 0.007 12 SED10-1 (DUPLICATE OF SED1-1) P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT ORGANOCHLORINE (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) PESTICIDES P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) P,P'- (P,P'-DDD) 0.0090 NS NS 0.008 6 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDD) 0.011 0.00354 0.00851 NS NS P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) 0.016 NS NS 0.005 19 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDE) 0.016 0.00142 0.00675 NS NS DDT (TOTAL) 0.0290 0.00119 0.00477 0.007 12 SED1-3 (6.0 - 7.5m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT ORGANOCHLORINE (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) PESTICIDES (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) P,P'- (P,P'-DDD) 0.021 NS NS 0.008 6 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDD) 0.028 0.00354 0.00851 NS NS P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) 0.033 NS NS 0.005 19 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDE) 0.033 0.00142 0.00675 NS NS DDT (TOTAL) 0.0670 0.00119 0.00477 0.007 12 SED5 SED2-1 (3.1 - 4.5m) SED6 CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT ORGANOCHLORINE (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) PESTICIDES (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDE) 0.0040 0.00142 0.00675 NS NS DDT (TOTAL) 0.0040 0.00119 0.00477 0.007 12 SED2-3 (6.0 - 7.5m) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT ORGANOCHLORINE (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) PESTICIDES P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) P,P'- (P,P'-DDD) 0.022 NS NS 0.008 6 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDD) 0.030 0.00354 0.00851 NS NS P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) 0.035 NS NS 0.005 19 (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDE) 0.035 0.00142 0.00675 NS NS DDT (TOTAL) 0.070 0.00119 0.00477 0.007 12 • SED6 SED3-1 (3.7 - 4.6m) CONCENTRATION CCME SEDIMENT CCME SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT MOE SEDIMENT ORGANOCHLORINE (pg/g) GUIDELINES' (ISQG) GUIDELINES' (PEL) GUIDELINES 2 (LEL) GUIDELINES 2 (SEL) PESTICIDES (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (pg/g) (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDD) 0.0040 0.00354 0.00851 NS NS P,P'- (P,P'-DDE) 0.0050 NS NS 0.005 19 - (TOTAL) (O,P'-+P,P'-DDE) 0.0050 0.00142 0.00675 NS NS DDT (TOTAL) 0.0090 0.00119 0.00477 0.007 12 1 LEGEND O GREATER THAN STANDARDS 9 MONITORING WELL SURFICIAL SEDIMENT / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION 4 DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION - PROJECT AREA BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS CCME GUIDELINES BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS MOE SEDIMENT STANDARDS NOTE: 1. CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT (CCME) CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GUIDELINES (1999, UPDATED 2012); CHAPTER 6 CANADIAN SEDIMENT QUALITY GUIDELINES (SAGS) FOR THE PROTECTION OF AQUATIC LIFE FOR FRESHWATER PROVIDED IN THE ON-LINE CCME CEQG SUMMARY TABLE; INTERIM SEDIMENT QUALITY GUIDELINES (ISQGS) AND PROBABLE EFFECT LEVELS (PELS) 2. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT (MOE) GUIDELINE; FOR IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING AND MANAGING CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS IN ONTARIO: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH (MAY 2008); LOWEST EFFECT LEVELS (LELS) AND SEVERE EFFECT LEVELS (SELS); TABLE 1: PROVINCIAL SEDIMENT QUALITY GUIDELINES (PSQGS) FOR METALS AND NUTRIENTS 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 5B TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. GROUNDWATER EXCEEDANCES SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO 2 EXISTING ( ABOVE GROUND MW1C FUELSTORAGE TANKS (ASTs) F AUTOMATION BUILDING o MW1iO3 1 LEGEND 0 GREATER THAN STANDARDS MONITORING WELL SURFICIAL SEDIMEN F / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION 40 DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION — PROJECT AREA BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS CCME GUIDELINES BOLD# SAMPLE CONCENTRATION EXCEEDS MOE TABLE 3 STANDARDS NOTE: 1. ENVIRONMENT CANADA GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON FEDERAL INTERIM GROUNDWATER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR FEDERAL CONTAMINATED SITES (MAY 2010, UPDATED NOVEMBER 2012), HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS FIGQGS; TABLE 3 TIER 1 GENERIC GUIDELINES FOR COARSE—GRAINED SOILS IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USES 2. CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT (CCME) CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GUIDELINES (UPDATED 2012), HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS CEQG; CHAPTER 4 CANADIAN WATER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR THE PROTECTION OF AQUATIC LIFE (FIGQGS—PAL) FOR FRESHWATEF (FW) PROVIDED IN THE ON—LINE CCME CEQG SUMMARY TABLE 3. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT (MOE) SOIL, GROUND WATER AND SEDIMENT STANDARDS FOR USE UNDER PART XV.1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (APRIL 15 2011); TABLE 3 NON—POTABLE GROUNDWATER STANDARDS FOR COARSE TEXTURED SOIL 4.MOE SOIL, GROUND WATER AND SEDIMENT STANDARDS FOR USE UNDER PART XV.1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (APRIL 15,2011); TABLE 9 NON—POTABLE GROUNDWATER STANDARDS FOR USE WITHIN 30 M OF A WATER BODY IN ALL TYPES OF PROPERTY USE I 7 �� MW101 CONCENTRATION ENV CAN f METALS (Ng/L) FIGQGS' (N( IRON 4,300 300 , S D1 Ar •SID3 , , Public S and GovernmentmentServices Canada 11 _1 CCME CWQGS—PAL MOE TABLE 3 MOE TABLE 9 FRESHWATER' (Ng/L) STANDARDS 3 (Ng/L) STANDARDS 4(p 300 NS NS SED5 MW102 CONCENTRATION ENV CAN CONCENTRATION ENV CAN CCME CWQGS—PAL MOE TABLE 3 MOE TABLE 9 METALS (Ng/L) FIGQGS' (Ng/L) FRESHWATER' (pg/L) STANDARDS' (Ng/L) STANDARDS ° (Ng/L) ARSENIC 8.4 5 5 1,900 1,500 IRON 7,700 300 300 NS NS MW103 CONCENTRATION ENV CAN METALS (Ng/L) FIGQGS' (Nc IRON 20,000 300 MW104 (DUPLICATE OF MW103) CONCENTRATION ENV CAN SED6 METALS (Ng/L) FIGQGS'(Nc IRON 22,000 300 LAKE ERIE SED8 S 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. CCME CWQGS—PAL MOE TABLE 3 MOE TABLE 9 FRESHWATER' (Ng/L) STANDARDS' (Ng/L) STANDARDS ° (N 300 NS NS CCME CWQGS—PAL MOE TABLE 3 MOE TABLE 9 FRESHWATER' (Ng/L) STANDARDS 3 (Ng/L) STANDARDS 4 (N 300 NS NS CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 6 TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. N t _ a a * 2 EXISTING f ABOVE GROUND + FUELSTORAGE TANKS (ASTs) NOW AUTOMATION BUILDIN -4 �� INTERPRETED GROUNDWATER FLOW (AS OF DECEMBERo2012) CRAFT PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO -------------------- i �- LEGEND 96.91mWATER TABLE ELEVATION RELATIVE TO ON-SITE BENCHMARK INTERPRETED GROUNDWATER CONTOUR (AS OF DECEMBER 5, 2012) GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION MONITORING WELL SURFICIAL SEDIMENT / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION -i DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA �w 9, 21i 91 2O1 SEL if LAKE ERIE 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. SED5 Public Works and Government Services Canada CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SC CHECKED GLL FIGURE 7 it--. TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. N _ a SUMMARY OF CONTAMINATED SITES SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO D1 _ 2 EXISTING f ABOVE GROUND MW102 ED2 + FUELSTORAGE TANKS (ASTs) F' NOWw AUTOMATION BUILDING D3 ,,%L� LEGEND ® CONTAMINATED SITE MONITORING WELL SURFICIAL SEDIMENT / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION -i DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA CS0002 L t ' LAKE ERIE 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. SED5 Public Works and Government Services Canada CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 8 it--. TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. a PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL. ONTARIO ?�3 ? _ 2 EXISTING � ABOVEGROUND / MW1' D2 + FUELSTORAGE b TANKS (ASTs) ? UNDERGROUND----'— NOW SEWER ? `_— AUTOMATION BUILDING o S D3 MW103 ? Vy ? ? ? I UNDERGROUND--_ 7 HYDR , ? V LEGEND PHC IMPACTS IN SEDIMENT PHC IMPACTS IN SOIL ® PAH IMPACTS IN SOIL METALS / INORGANICS IMPACTS IN SEDIMENT OCP IMPACTS IN SEDIMENT O PAH IMPACTS IN SEDIMENT 0 METALS IMPACT IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SURFICIAL SEDIMENT / BACKGROUND SAMPLING LOCATION -i DEEP SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA A— SED5 0 200m 400m (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH 2010 IMAGERY. Public Works and Government Services Canada i _1 CB664.00 AS SHOWN MARCH 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 9 CLIENT Tv'?Environ ] P CROSS SECTION A - A' Public Works and T�_`SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Government Services mental Ltd. PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO Canada A loom o N C) co 9� o 9m GROUND SURFACE ° ---__-__----_i .� 97.44m 97.37m 97m DEC 5/2012 ? - 97.13m ? - DEC 5/2012 DEC 5/2012 95m 94m ����?----------?----------.7.------- ? 93m `—�--? ----------?----------?------- 92m 91m 90m Z WATER LEVEL L— J PHC IMPACTS IN SOIL L—J PAH IMPACTS IN SOIL L—J METALS IMPACT IN GROUNDWATER -RISER PIPE SCREENED LEVEL -DEPTH OF BOREHOLE VERTICAL SCALE 0 2.5m 5m (APPROXIMATE) —.?----------- NOTES: MONITORING WELLS ARE SCALED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. BOREHOLES WERE ADVANCED TO 7.5 m BELOW GROUND SURFACE (m bgs). MONITORING WELLS WERE INSTALLED TO 4.6 m bgs. HORIZONTAL SCALE 0 50m loom (APPROXIMATE) A' CB664.00 AS SHOWN FEBRUARY 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 10A TOPSOIL COAL CHIPS AND FINE SAND SAND ® SANDY SILT Z WATER LEVEL L— J PHC IMPACTS IN SOIL L—J PAH IMPACTS IN SOIL L—J METALS IMPACT IN GROUNDWATER -RISER PIPE SCREENED LEVEL -DEPTH OF BOREHOLE VERTICAL SCALE 0 2.5m 5m (APPROXIMATE) —.?----------- NOTES: MONITORING WELLS ARE SCALED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. BOREHOLES WERE ADVANCED TO 7.5 m BELOW GROUND SURFACE (m bgs). MONITORING WELLS WERE INSTALLED TO 4.6 m bgs. HORIZONTAL SCALE 0 50m loom (APPROXIMATE) A' CB664.00 AS SHOWN FEBRUARY 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 10A CLIENT CROSS SECTION B - B' Public Works and TE 'RAPE SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Government Services Environmental Ltd. PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO Canada 100m N O J 98m --------------- ---- w N D d -? 97.13m 97m '�-- -7 - - - - � DEC 5I2012 - WATER SURFACE F 96m I%.. --?-----?------?- 95m 94m---?---------�-- 93m ' 92m 91m 90m 89m 88m TOPSOIL COAL CHIPS Z WATER LEVEL AND FINE SAND SAND ® SANDY SILT r i PHC IMPACTS IN SOIL CLAYEY SILT CLIENT CROSS SECTION B - B' Public Works and TE 'RAPE SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Government Services Environmental Ltd. PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO Canada 100m N O J 98m --------------- ---- w N D d -? 97.13m 97m '�-- -7 - - - - � DEC 5I2012 - WATER SURFACE F 96m I%.. --?-----?------?- 95m 94m---?---------�-- 93m ' 92m 91m 90m 89m 88m -RISER PIPE VERTICAL SCALE HORIZONTAL SCALE 0 2.5m 5m 0 25m 50m (APPROXIMATE) (APPROXIMATE) SCREENED LEVEL NOTES: MONITORING WELLS ARE SCALED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. BOREHOLE MW102 WAS ADVANCED TO 7.5 m BELOW GROUND SURFACE (m bgs). MONITORING WELL MW102 WAS INSTALLED TO 4.6 m bgs. DEPTH OF BOREHOLE BOREHOLE SED2 WAS ADVANCED TO 7.5 m BELOW WATER SURFACE. CB664.00 AS SHOWN FEBRUARY 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 10B SEDIMENT SAMPLE Z WATER LEVEL BOREHOLE r—� METALS IMPACT INFERRED WATER LEVEL L—J IN SEDIMENT r i PHC IMPACTS IN SOIL r—i NUTRIENTS IMPACT L—J L --.J IN SEDIMENT r i PAH IMPACTS IN SOIL r—i PAH IMPACT - LJ L ---J IN SEDIMENT r-1 METALS IMPACT OCPIMPACT L ---J IN GROUNDWATER IN SEDIMENT -RISER PIPE VERTICAL SCALE HORIZONTAL SCALE 0 2.5m 5m 0 25m 50m (APPROXIMATE) (APPROXIMATE) SCREENED LEVEL NOTES: MONITORING WELLS ARE SCALED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. BOREHOLE MW102 WAS ADVANCED TO 7.5 m BELOW GROUND SURFACE (m bgs). MONITORING WELL MW102 WAS INSTALLED TO 4.6 m bgs. DEPTH OF BOREHOLE BOREHOLE SED2 WAS ADVANCED TO 7.5 m BELOW WATER SURFACE. CB664.00 AS SHOWN FEBRUARY 2013 SF CHECKED GLL FIGURE 10B TABLES Entered by: RA TABLE 1 SUMMARY TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN Reviewed by: GLL Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario APEC ISSUE/SOURCE REFERENCE LOCATION SITE BACKGROUND SUSPECTED PHOTOGRAPHS RECOMMENDATION CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN APEC 1 - Historical storage of fuel for distribution by tank - Port Bunnell Small Craft - Two Contaminated Sites, - Metals/Inorganics - Photos 3 to 8,12 to - Intrusive investigation to facilitate the collection of soil, sediment and trucks and by boat, including loading/unloading Harbour (Part 2, 6, and 7 FCSI 00012785 and - Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) 19, 21, 22, and 27 groundwater samples for analysis of Contaminants of Potential Concern of fuel oil and undocumented occurences of on Plan 11 R-6760) FCS100012786 have - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to 35 (COPCs). spills - Refer to Figure 2 previously been identified at (PAHs) - Drilled three borehole/monitoring wells to approximately 7.6 m below - Area was identified as a Potential Area Of APEC 1 (metals and - Organochlorined Pesticides (OCPs) grade in land portion and infilled turning basin of subject site. Concern (PAOC) by MacViro Consultants Ltd. pesticides impacts identified - Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) - Submitted fifteen soil samples (including four field duplicates) for (MacViro) in their report entitled Enhanced in sediment) laboratory analysis of PHCs, PAHs, metals, OCPs, PCBs, and pH. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Port - Submitted three soil samples for grain size distribution. Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Site No.4766 Collected three deep sediment cores to approximately 7.6 m below water (March 2001) surface in water lot portion (Big Otter Creek) of subject site. -Continued use as recreational and commercial - Collected nine surficial sediment samples (six in harbour and three fishing small craft harbour background samples in Lake Erie). - Submitted thirteen sediment samples (including one field duplicate) for laboratory analysis of PHCs, PAHs, metals, inorganics, nutrients, and pH. - Submitted ten sediment samples (including one field duplicate) for laboratory analysis of OCPs and PCBs. - Submitted three sediment samples for grain size distribution. - Submitted four sets of groundwater samples (including one field duplicate) for laboratory analysis of PHCs, metals, PAHs, PCBs, pH, and hardness. - Refer to Figure 2 APEC 2 - Historical land use of adjacent properties west - Surrounding properties - Historical storage of coal - Metals/Inorganics - Photos 7, 9 to 11, - Intrusive investigation to facilitate the collection of soil, sediment and of the site as a commercial and industrial port for adjacent to the west and potash, and a 2,700,OOL -PHCs and 23 to 26 groundwater samples for analysis of COPCs to address potential impacts t shipping, transportation and storage of property boundary of the capacity bulk fuel oil storage -PAHs the subject site (APEC 1) from historical and current off-site sources (see commodities such as coal, potash, fuel oil, Port Burwell Small Craft tank located on surrounding -PCBs above recommendation). lumber, staves Harbour property OCPs - Two ASTs on Port Bunnell Harbour Facility - Refer to Figure 2 - two ASTs on Port Burwell property immediately adjacent to the west side of Harbour Facility property the subject property - Bradfield Marina with one - One UST at Bradfield Marina, located upstream UST upstream and adjacent and adjacent to northwest portion of subject to northwest portion of property subject property -Sewage plant with outfall draining into subject site - Area was not identified as a APEC in the MacViro March 2001 Report APEC 3 - Historical land use of adjacent properties east -Surrounding properties - Historical storage of coal - Metals/Inorganics - Photos 1, 2, 5, and - Intrusive investigation to facilitate the collection of soil, sediment and of the site as a commercial and industrial port for adjacent to the east and potash. - PHCs 6 groundwater samples for analysis of COPCs to address potential impacts t shipping, transportation and storage of property boundary of the - Historical locomotive rail - PAHs the subject site (APEC 1) from historical and current off-site sources (see commodities such as coal, potash, fuel oil, Port Burwell Small Craft infrastructure, including a - PCBs above recommendation). lumber, staves Harbour locomotive turntable - Historical locomotive rail infrastructure, - Refer to Figure 2 roundhouse structure including a locomotive turntable roundhouse structure - Area identified as an APEC in the MacViro March 2001 Report PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Reviewed by. GLL TABLE 2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario WELL NUMBER MONITORING DATE GROUND ELEVATION' T.O.P. ELEVATION 2 COMBUSTIBLE VAPOUR 3 DEPTH TO WATER FROM T.O.P. s DEPTH TO WATER FROM GROUND' GROUNDWATER ELEVATION a LNAPL THICKNESS' Gastechtor 4PID MW 101 05 -Dec -12 98.92 98.84 25 ppm 0.3 ppm 1.40 1.48 97.44 None MW 102 05 -Dec -12 98.62 98.54 50 ppm 0.4 ppm 1.40 1.48 97.13 None MW103 05 -Dec -12 98.32 98.23 12% LEL 0.0 ppm 0.86 0.94 97.37 None ' Elevation of ground surface at well location, in metres, relative to on-site benchmark 2 Elevation of highest point of well pipe, in metres, relative to on-site benchmark 3 Combustible vapour concentration in the well headspace, in parts per million (ppm) or percent of the lower explosive limit (% LEL) ° Gastechtor operated in the methane elimination mode 5 Photoionization Detector 6 Corrected depth to groundwater, in metres from top of well pipe, assuming a light non -aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) relative density of 0.8 7 Corrected depth to groundwater, in metres from ground surface, assuming a LNAPL relative density of 0.8 8 Corrected elevation of groundwater, in metres relative to on-site benchmark, assuming a LNAPL relative density of 0.8 9 Measured thickness of LNAPL, in metres, if any PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 3 PURGE WATER MONITORING DATA Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Monitoring Well Units MW101 MW102 MW103 Sampling Date my 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 Initial Temperature °C 9.58 10.12 7.57 Temperature 1 °C 9.69 10.39 9.11 Temperature 2 °C 9.62 10.65 9.37 Temperature 3 °C 9.66 10.41 9.53 Temperature 4 °C 9.69 10.40 9.03 Temperature 5 °C 9.70 - 9.41 Temperature 6 °C 9.66 9.12 Temperature 7 °C - 8.86 Temperature 8 °C - - 9.00 Initial Conductivity ms/cm 466 711 562 Conductivity 1 ms/cm 516 718 720 Conductivity 2 ms/cm 518 735 777 Conductivity 3 ms/cm 519 736 816 Conductivity ms/cm 519 736 834 Conductivity 5 ms/cm 519 - 1051 Conductivity 6 ms/cm 517 977 Conductivity 7 ms/cm 518 947 Conductivity 8 ms/cm - - 951 Initial pH pH units 6.61 7.13 6.44 pH 1 pH units 6.67 7.16 6.56 pH 2 pH units 6.72 7.16 6.72 pH 3 pH units 6.76 7.17 6.74 pH 4 pH units 6.79 7.15 6.76 pH 5 pH units 6.83 - 6.70 pH 6 pH units 6.88 6.74 pH 7 pH units - 6.76 pH 8 pH units - - 6.77 Initial Redox Potential mV -10.7 -75.5 -34.4 ORP 1 mV -25.8 -79.1 -51.7 ORP 2 mV -27.8 -80.4 -89.1 ORP 3 my -32.3 -83.1 -96.7 ORP 4 mV -33.5 -83.1 -103.6 ORP 5 mV -38.5 - -105.9 ORP 6 mV -44.6 -117.1 ORP 7 my - -119.1 ORP 8 my - - -120.1 Initial Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 9.95 3.41 2.96 Dissolved Oxygen 1 mg/L 5.92 1.41 2.96 Dissolved Oxygen 2 mg/L 3.63 1.79 2.00 Dissolved Oxygen 3 mg/L 2.82 1.85 4.18 Dissolved Oxygen 4 mg/L 2.25 1.61 3.02 Dissolved Oxygen 5 mg/L 1.83 - 2.03 Dissolved Oxygen 6 mg/L 1.51 1.48 Dissolved Oxygen 7 mg/L - 1.50 Dissolved Oxygen 8 mg/L 1.43 ORP Oxidation Reduction Potential °C Degrees Celsius ms/cm milliSiemens per centimetre my Millivolts mg/L Milligrams per litre Not measured TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL Entered by. RA Reviewed by. GLL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.0081.009 CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 4 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SOIL GUIDELINES' CCME TIER 1 LEVELS z CCME TIER 2 LEVELS' MOE TABLE 9 STANDARDS 4 RDLs s MW101-3 MW101-6 Field Duplicate of MW101-3 MW102-4' MW103-4 Sampling Date 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 Sample Depth m bg 3.1-4.6 3.1-4.6 4.6-6.1 4.6-6.1 CSV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 400 ppm 400 ppm 175 ppm 125 ppm CSV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 2.8 ppm 2.8 ppm 12.7 ppm 1.0 ppm Benzene pg/g 0.030 ns ns 0.02 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Toluene pg/g 0.37 ns ns 0.2 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Ethylbenzene pg/g 0.082 ns ns 0.05 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Xylenes (total) pg/g 11 ns ns 0.05 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F1 pg/g ns 320 4.2 25 10 <10 <10<10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F2 Ng/g ns 260 5.3 10 10 13 13 20 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F3 pg/g ns 1,700 1,700 240 10 40 44 58 40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F4 pg/g ns 3,300 3,300 120 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 7 Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table for coarse-grained surface soils in a Commercial land use; 10-5 Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR) for benzene 2 CCME Canada -Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil - Technical Supplement (January 2008); Table 3 Tier 1 Levels for coarse-grained surface soils in a Commercial land use; Eco Soil Contact Exposure Pathway for PHC F1, PHC F2, PHC F3, and PHC F4 3 CCME Canada -Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil - Technical Supplement (January 2008); calculated Tier 2 Levels for coarse-grained surface soils in a Commercial land use; Protection of Groundwater for Freshwater Aquatic Life Expoure Pathway for PHC F1 and PHC F2; Eco Soil Contact Exposure Pathway for PHC F3, and PHC F4; applicable to sampling locations within 10 m of a surface water body 4 MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV I of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Table 9 Generic Soil Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a non -potable groundwater condition for coarse textured soil in a Residential/Parkland/Institutional/Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use Reportable detection limit (RDL) 6 Sampling location is within 10 m of a surface water body ns No SQG, Tier 1 Level, Tier 2 Level, or MOE Standard (as applicable) m bg Metres below grade CSV Reading Combustible soil vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME SQG, Tier 1 Level, or Tier 2 Level, as applicable VALUE Exceeds MOE Table 9 Standard PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Revie dby. GLL TABLE 5 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS - POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SOIL GUIDELINES' MOE TABLE 9 STANDARDS2 RDLs 3 MW101-16 MW102-18' MW102-1E' Field Duplicate of MW 102-1B MW103-1B Sampling Date 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 Sample Depth m bg 0.3-0.4 0.15-0.3 0.15-0.3 0.15 -1.5 CSV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns <10 ppm 15 ppm 15 ppm 35 ppm CSV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns - 2.0 ppm 106 ppm 106 ppm 1.0 ppm Acenaphthene pg/g 0.28' 0.072 0.0050 <0.010 0.10 <0.030 <0.0050 Acenaphthylene pg/g 320 5 0.093 0.0050 <0.0050 0.0089 <0.010 <0.0050 Anthracene Ng/g 32 0.22 0.0050 0.028 0.042 0.020 <0.0050 Benzo[a]anthracene Ng/g 10 0.36 0.0050 0.063 0.23 0.086 <0.0050 Benzo[a]pyrene pg/g 72 0.3 0.0050 0.028 0.080 0.033 <0.0050 Benzo[b]fluoranthene pg/g 10 0.47 0.0050 0.028 0.12 0.047 <0.0050 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Ng/g ns 5 0.68 0.0050 0.017 0.057 0.029 <0.0050 Benzo[k]fluoranthene pg/g 10 0.48 0.0050 0.0053 0.021 0.0097 <0.0050 Chrysene pg/g ns 5 2.8 0.0050 0.093 0.32 0.12 <0.0050 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene pg/g 10 0.1 0.0050 0.0056 0.017 0.0068 <0.0050 Fluoranthene Ng/g 180 0.69 0.0050 0.046 0.22 0.081 <0.0050 Fluorene pg/g 0.25 5 0.19 0.0050 0.015 0.077 0.025 <0.0050 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene pg/g 10 0.23 0.0050 0.0063 0.028 0.012 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene, 1- pg/g ns 0.59 0.0050 0.34 2.3 0.80 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene, 2- pg/g ns 0.59 0.0050 0.41 2.7 1.2 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene, 1- & 2- (total) pg/g ns 0.59 0.0071 0.75 5.1 2.0 <0.0071 Naphthalene pg/g 0.013 5 0.09 0.0050 0.16 1.3 0.56 <0.0050 Phenanthrene pg/g 0.046 5 0.69 0.0050 0.32 1.8 0.58 <0.0050 Pyrene pg/g 100 1 0.0050 0.061 0.26 0.095 <0.0050 B[a]P TPE 7 Ng/g 5.3 ns - 0.04 0.14 0.06 0.01 IACR a pg/g 1.0 ns 0.55 2.04 0.80 0.06 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 7 Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table for coarse-grained surface soils in a Commercial land use 2 MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Table 9 Generic Soil Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a non -potable groundwater condition for coarse textured soil in a Residential/Parkland/Institutional/ Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use 3 Reportable detection limit ° Sampling location is within 10 m of a surface water body 5 No SQGE reported in CCME PAHs Table 1 for this PAH parameter; CCME PAHs Table 2 provides values for exposure pathways which are not applicable to the subject site; therefore, the corresponding MOE Standard is utilized Impact to surface water is a concern at the site; Protection of Freshwater Life Exposure Pathway utilized 7 Benzo[a]pyrene Total Potency Equivalent; the sum of estimated cancer potency relative to B1a1P for all Dotentially carcinogenic unsubstituted PAHs: 10"5 Incremental Lifetime Cancer 8 Index of Additive Cancer Risk; assesses potential threats to potable groundwater water quality from leaching of carcinogenic PAH mixtures from soil ns No SQG or MOE Standard (as applicable) m bg Metres below grade CSV Reading Combustible soil vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME SQG, B[a]P TPE, or IACR, as applicable VALUE Exceeds MOE Table 9 Standard PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by: RA Revie dby. GLL TABLE 6 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS - METALS and pH Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SOIL GUIDELINES' MOE TABLE 9 STANDARD 2 RDLs 3 MW101-1C MW102-1C° MW102-1F4 Field Duplicate of MW101-1C MW103-113 Sampling Date 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 20 -Nov -12 Sample Depth m bg 0.5-1.5 0.3-1.5 0.3-1.5 0.2-1.5 CSV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns 25 ppm 20 ppm 20 ppm 35 ppm CSV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns - 1.4 ppm 4.9 ppm 4.9 ppm 1.0 ppm Antimony pg/g 40 1.3 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Arsenic pg/g 12 18 1.0 1.8 1.7 2.2 <1.0 Barium pg/g 2,000 220 0.50 8.0 7.8 8.9 8.8 Beryllium pg/g 8 2.5 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Bismuth pg/g ns ns 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Boron (total) pg/g ns 36 5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Boron (Hot Water Soluble) s pg/g ns 1.5 0.050 0.054 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Cadmium pg/g 22 1.2 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Calcium pg/g ns ns 50 76,000 67,000 69,000 47,000 Chromium pg/g 87 70 1.0 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 Chromium (VI) pg/g ns 0.66 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Cobalt pg/g 300 22 0.10 1.7 1.7 2.1 1.4 Copper pg/g 91 92 0.50 4.1 3.9 4.3 3.0 Iron pg/g ns ns 50 5,400 4,600 5,600 4,400 Lead pg/g 260 120 1.0 3.8 3.6 3.8 2.6 Mercury pg/g 24 0.27 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Magnesium pg/g ns ns 50 9,900 8,400 9,000 8,000 Manganese pg/g ns ns 1.0 190 180 210 140 Molybdenum pg/g 40 2 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Nickel pg/g 50 82 0.50 3.2 3.2 3.6 2.5 Phosphorus pg/g ns ns 50 520 370 400 460 Potassium pg/g ns ns 200 <200 <200 <200 <200 Selenium pg/g 2.9 1.5 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Silver pg/g 40 0.5 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Sodium pg/g ns ns 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 Strontium pg/g ns ns 1.0 95 83 84 57 Sulphur pg/g ns ns 50 200 170 150 64 Thallium Pg/g; 1 ns 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Tin pg/g 300 ns 5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Tungsten pg/g ns ns 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ium ULZ,H pg/g 33 2.5 0.050 0.25 0.22 0.22 0.19 dium pg/g 130 86 5.0 8.5 6.3 7.3 6.4 pg/g 360 290 5.0 15 13 14 14 nium pg/g ns ns 1 1 1 1 <1 pH units 6 to 8 ns 7.11 7.60 7.78 7.64 ' Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 7 Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table for coarse-grained surface soils in a Commercial land use 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Table 9 Generic Soil Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a non -potable groundwater condition for coarse textured soil in a Residential/Parkland/Institutional/ Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) Sampling location is located within 10 m of a surface water body s MOE Table 9 states: "The boron standards are for hot water soluble extract for all surface soils. For subsurface soils the standards are for total boron (mixed strong acid digest), since plant protection for soils below the root zone is not a significant concern." ns No SQG or Standard (as applicable) m bg Metres below grade CSV Reading Combustible soil vapour reading (ppm or % LEL) PPM Parts per million (by volume) LEL Percent of the lower explosive limit pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME SQG VALUE Exceeds MOE Table 9 Standard PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Revie dby. GLL TABLE 7 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS - ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES and PCBs Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SOIL GUIDELINES' MOE TABLE 9 STANDARD 2 RDLs 3 MW101-1A MW102-1A° MW102-1D° Field Duplicate of MW102-1A MW103-1A Sampling Date Nov 20, 2012 Nov 20, 2012 Nov 20, 2012 Nov 20, 2012 Sample Depth m bg 0.0-0.3 0.0-0.15 0.0-0.15 0.0-0.15 CSV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns <10 ppm 75 ppm 75 ppm <10 ppm CSV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns - 1.7 ppm 46.7 ppm 46.7 ppm 1.0 ppm Aldrin ug/g ns 0.05 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Chlordane, a- ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Chlordane, g- ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Chlordane (total) ug/g ns 0.05 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, o,p'- (o,p'-DDD) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane,p,p'- (p,p'-DDD) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 0.0020 0.0030 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (total) (o,p'- + p,p'-DDD) ug/g ns 0.05 0.0020 <0.0020 0.0020 0.0030 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, o,p'- (o,p'-DDE) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, pp'- (pp' -DDE) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 0.018 0.018 0.0090 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (total) (o,p'-+p,p'-DDE) ug/g ns 0.05 0.0020 <0.0020 0.018 0.018 0.0090 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, o,p'- (o,p'-DDT) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, pp'- (pp' -DDT) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 0.0050 0.016 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane(total) (o,p'-+p,p'-DDT) ug/g 12 1.4 0.0020 <0.0020 0.0050 0.016 <0.0020 Dieldrin ug/g ns 0.05 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Lindane (gamma -BHC; Hexachlorocyclohexane) ug/g ns 0.01 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endosulfan I (alpha) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endosulfanll(beta) ug/g ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endosulfan (total) ug/g ns 0.04 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endrin ug/g ns 0.04 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Heptachlor ug/g ns 0.05 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Heptachlor epoxide ug/g ns 0.05 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Hexachlorobenzene ug/g 10 0.02 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Hexachlorobutadiene ug/g ns 0.01 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Hexachloroethane ug/g ns 0.01 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Methoxychlor ug/g ns 0.05 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Polychlorinated biphenyls (total) (PCBs) ug/g 33 0.3 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor1242 ug/g ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1248 ug/g ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor1254 ug/g ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor1260 ug/9 ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 7 Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table for coarse-grained surface soils in a Commercial land use MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Table 9 Generic Soil Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a non -potable groundwater condition for coarse textured soil in a ResidentiaVParkland/Institutional/ Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) ° Sampling location is located within 10 m of a surface water body ns No SQG or Standard (as applicable) m bg Metres below grade CSV Reading Combustible soil vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME SQG VALUE Exceeds MOE Table 9 Standard FINAL PWGSC Project No. R.0059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 8 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 SEL RDLs s SED1-1 SED10-1 Field Duplicate of SED1-1 SED1-3 SED2-1 Sampling Date pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m bws 3.0-4.5 3.0-4.5 6.0-7.5 3.1-4.5 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 40 ppm 40 ppm 40 ppm 25 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Benzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Toluene Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Ethylbenzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Xylenes (total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F1 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F2 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F3 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 180 83 69 19 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F4 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 40 12 <10 <10 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 4 (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 8 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario (CONTINUED) Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 SEL RDLs s SED2-3 SED3-1 SED3-2 SED4-1 Sampling Date pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m bws 6.0-7.5 3.7-4.6 4.6-6.0 1.5 - 1.6 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 65 ppm 10 ppm 50 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.7 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Benzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Toluene Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Ethylbenzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Xylenes (total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F1 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F2 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <20 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F3 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 59 <10 42 45 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F4 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <20 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 2 of 4 (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 2 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 8 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario (CONTINUED) Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs s SED5-1 SED6-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 Sampling Date pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Reference Area Harbour Reference Area Reference Area Sample Depth m bws 1.5-1.6 1.2 - 1.3 1.0 - 1.1 3.0-3.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.3 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.3 ppm Benzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 Toluene Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Ethylbenzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Xylenes (total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F1 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F2 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 19 <10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F3 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 18 53 14 19 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F4 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 3 of 4 (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 3 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 8 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario (CONTINUED) Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs s SED9-1 Sampling Date Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Sample Depth m bws 1.0 - 1.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.1 ppm Benzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.005 <0.005 Toluene Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.02 <0.02 Ethylbenzene pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.01 <0.01 Xylenes (total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.04 <0.04 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F1 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F2 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F3 Ng/g ns ns ns ns 10 24 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F4 pg/g ns ns ns ns 10 <10 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 4 of 4 (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 4 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 9 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs 3 SED1-1 SED10-1 Field Duplicate of SED1-1 SED1-3 SED2-1 Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m Bws 3.0-4.5 3.0-4.5 6.0-7.5 3.1-4.5 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 40 ppm 40 ppm 40 ppm 25 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Acenaphthene Ng/g 0.00671 0.0889 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Acenaphthylene Ilg/g 0.00587 0.128 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Anthracene Ng/g 0.0469 0.245 0.220 370 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.0068 <0.0050 Benzo[a]anthracene Ng/g 0.0317 0.385 0.320 1,480 0.0050 0.0076 0.0084 0.025 0.010 Benzo[a]pyrene Ng/g 0.0319 0.782 0.370 1,440 0.0050 0.0079 0.0096 0.020 0.0098 Benzo[b/J]fluoranthene ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 0.013 0.016 0.026 0.017 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Ng/g ns ns 0.170 320 0.0050 <0.0050 0.0066 0.012 0.0061 Benzo[k]fluoranthene Ng/g ns ns 0.240 1,340 0.0050 <0.0050 0.0054 0.0098 0.0059 Chrysene Ng/g 0.0571 0.862 0.340 460 0.0050 0.011 0.016 0.021 0.020 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene Ng/g 0.00622 0.135 0.060 130 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Fluoranthene Ng/g 0.111 2.355 0.750 1,020 0.0050 0.017 0.021 0.055 0.022 Fluorene Ilg/g 0.0212 0.144 0.190 160 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.0055 <0.0050 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Ng/g ns ns 0.200 320 0.0050 0.0058 0.0073 0.014 0.0069 Methylnaphthalene,1- Ilg/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene,2- Ng/g 0.0202 0.201 ns ns 0.0050 0.0052 <0.0050 0.0051 0.0065 Methylnaphthalene, 1- & 2 -(total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.0071 0.0052 <0.0050 0.0051 0.0065 Naphthalene Ilg/g 0.0346 0.391 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Phenanthrene pg/g 0.0419 0.515 0.560 950 0.0050 0.0068 0.011 0.034 0.0094 Pyrene Ng/g 0.053 0.875 0.490 850 0.0050 0.015 0.017 0.048 0.018 PAH (total) 5 Ilg/g ns ns 4 10,000 - 0.0850 0.1183 0.2722 0.1161 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line f:C�AF CFOr� Rummary Tahlw• Intarim Redimwnf Oualifv r�uidelinws IIROrsI anri Prnhahla Effect I evala lPFI sl 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario, An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 2b: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) ° Detection limits were adjusted for high moisture content 5 PAH (total) is the sum of 16 PAH compounds: Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Anthracene, Benzo[a]anthracene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Benzo[g,h,i]perylene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Chrysene, Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Indeno[1,2,3-cd], Naphthalene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) Ng/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 9 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 SEL RDLs 3 SED2-3 SED3-1 SED3-2 SED4-1 Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m Bws 6.0-7.5 3.7-4.6 4.6-6.0 1.5 - 1.6 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 65 ppm 10 ppm 50 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.7 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Acenaphthene Ng/g 0.00671 0.0889 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.010 ° Acenaphthylene {Ig/g 0.00587 0.128 ns ns 0.0050 0.0080 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.010 ° Anthracene Ng/g 0.0469 0.245 0.220 370 0.0050 0.013 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0101 Benzo[a]anthracene Ng/g 0.0317 0.385 0.320 1,480 0.0050 0.045 0.0066 0.012 0.012 Benzo[a]pyrene Ng/g 0.0319 0.782 0.370 1,440 0.0050 0.034 0.0067 0.010 <0.0104 Benzo[b/J]fluoranthene ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 0.045 0.011 0.015 0.016 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Ng/g ns ns 0.170 320 0.0050 0.021 <0.0050 0.0075 <0.0104 Benzo[k]fluoranthene Ng/g ns ns 0.240 1,340 0.0050 0.017 <0.0050 0.0059 <0.0104 Chrysene Ng/g 0.0571 0.862 0.340 460 0.0050 0.043 0.0084 0.016 0.014 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene Ng/g 0.00622 0.135 0.060 130 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0104 Fluoranthene pg/g 0.111 2.355 0.750 1,020 0.0050 0.10 0.017 0.036 0.031 Fluorene Ilg/g 0.0212 0.144 0.190 160 0.0050 0.0093 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0104 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Ng/g ns ns 0.200 320 0.0050 0.025 <0.0050 0.0078 <0.0104 Methylnaphthalene, 1- Ilg/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 0.0066 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0104 Methylnaphthalene,2- Ng/g 0.0202 0.201 ns ns 0.0050 0.011 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0104 Methylnaphthalene, 1- & 2 -(total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.0071 0.0176 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.010" Naphthalene Ilg/g 0.0346 0.391 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0104 Phenanthrene pg/g 0.0419 0.515 0.560 950 0.0050 0.066 0.0090 0.022 0.013 Pyrene Ilg/g 0.053 0.875 0.490 850 0.0050 0.086 0.014 0.029 0.026 PAH (total) 5 Ilg/g ns ns 4 10,000 0.5129 0.0727 0.1612 0.1120 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line f:C�AF CFOr� Rummary Tahlw• Intarim Redimwnf Oualifv r�uidelinws IIROrsI anri Prnhahla Effect I evala lPFI sl 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario, An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 2b: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) ° Detection limits were adjusted for high moisture content 5 PAH (total) is the sum of 16 PAH compounds: Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Anthracene, Benzo[a]anthracene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Benzo[g,h,i]perylene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Chrysene, Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Indeno[1,2,3-cd], Naphthalene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) Ng/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 2 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 9 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs 3 SED5-1 SED6-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 Sampling Date 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Reference Area Harbour Reference Area Reference Area Sample Depth m Bws 1.5 - 1.6 1.2 - 1.3 1.0 - 1.1 3.0-3.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.3 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.3 ppm Acenaphthene Ng/g 0.00671 0.0889 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Acenaphthylene {Ig/g 0.00587 0.128 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Anthracene Ng/g 0.0469 0.245 0.220 370 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Benzo[a]anthracene Ng/g 0.0317 0.385 0.320 1,480 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Benzo[a]pyrene Ng/g 0.0319 0.782 0.370 1,440 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Benzo[b/J]fluoranthene ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Ng/g ns ns 0.170 320 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Benzo[k]fluoranthene Ng/g ns ns 0.240 1,340 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Chrysene Ng/g 0.0571 0.862 0.340 460 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene Ng/g 0.00622 0.135 0.060 130 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Fluoranthene pg/g 0.111 2.355 0.750 1,020 0.0050 0.0099 0.0062 <0.0050 <0.0050 Fluorene Ilg/g 0.0212 0.144 0.190 160 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Ng/g ns ns 0.200 320 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene, 1- Ilg/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene,2- Ng/g 0.0202 0.201 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene, 1- & 2- (total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.0071 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Naphthalene Ilg/g 0.0346 0.391 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Phenanthrene pg/g 0.0419 0.515 0.560 950 0.0050 0.0063 0.0076 <0.0050 <0.0050 Pyrene Ilg/g 0.053 0.875 0.490 850 0.0050 0.0081 0.0072 <0.0050 <0.0050 PAH (total) 5 Ilg/g ns ns 4 10,000 - 0.0243 0.0210 <0.0050 <0.0050 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line f:C�AF CFOr� Rummary Tahlw• Intarim Redimwnf Oualifv r�uidelinws IIROrsI anri Prnhahla Effect I evala lPFI sl 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario, An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 2b: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) ° Detection limits were adjusted for high moisture content 5 PAH (total) is the sum of 16 PAH compounds: Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Anthracene, Benzo[a]anthracene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Benzo[g,h,i]perylene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Chrysene, Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Indeno[1,2,3-cd], Naphthalene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) Ng/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 3 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 9 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs 3 SED9-1 Sampling Date 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Sample Depth m Bws 1.0 - 1.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.1 ppm Acenaphthene Ng/g 0.00671 0.0889 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 Acenaphthylene {Ig/g 0.00587 0.128 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 Anthracene Ng/g 0.0469 0.245 0.220 370 0.0050 <0.0050 Benzo[a]anthracene Ng/g 0.0317 0.385 0.320 1,480 0.0050 0.0071 Benzo[a]pyrene Ng/g 0.0319 0.782 0.370 1,440 0.0050 0.0063 Benzo[b/J]fluoranthene ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 0.011 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Ng/g ns ns 0.170 320 0.0050 0.0059 Benzo[k]fluoranthene Ng/g ns ns 0.240 1,340 0.0050 <0.0050 Chrysene Ng/g 0.0571 0.862 0.340 460 0.0050 0.0095 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene Ng/g 0.00622 0.135 0.060 130 0.0050 <0.0050 Fluoranthene pg/g 0.111 2.355 0.750 1,020 0.0050 0.018 Fluorene Ilg/g 0.0212 0.144 0.190 160 0.0050 <0.0050 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Ng/g ns ns 0.200 320 0.0050 0.0060 Methylnaphthalene, 1- Ilg/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 Methylnaphthalene,2- Ng/g 0.0202 0.201 ns ns 0.0050 0.0052 Methylnaphthalene, 1- & 2- (total) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.0071 0.0052 Naphthalene Ilg/g 0.0346 0.391 ns ns 0.0050 <0.0050 Phenanthrene pg/g 0.0419 0.515 0.560 950 0.0050 0.0073 Pyrene Ilg/g 0.053 0.875 0.490 850 0.0050 0.015 PAH (total) 5 Ilg/g ns ns 4 10,000 - 0.0861 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line f:C�AF CFOr� Rummary Tahlw• Intarim Redimwnf Oualifv r�uidelinws IIROrsI anri Prnhahla Effect I evala lPFI sl 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario, An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 2b: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) ° Detection limits were adjusted for high moisture content 5 PAH (total) is the sum of 16 PAH compounds: Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Anthracene, Benzo[a]anthracene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Benzo[g,h,i]perylene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Chrysene, Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, Fluoranthene, Fluorene, Indeno[1,2,3-cd], Naphthalene, Phenanthrene, and Pyrene m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) Ng/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 4 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 10 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - METALS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES z SEL RDLs 3 SED1-1 SED10-1 Field Duplicate of SED1-1 SED1-3 SED2-1 Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m bws 3.0-4.5 3.0-4.5 6.0-7.5 3.1-4.5 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 40 ppm 40 ppm 40 ppm 25 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Aluminum pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 2,600 2,600 7,600 3,000 Antimony pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Arsenic pg/g 5.9 17 6 33 1.0 1.5 1.6 3.5 1.9 Barium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 18 17 55 20 Beryllium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.39 <0.20 Cadmium Ng/g 0.6 3.5 0.6 10 0.10 <0.10 0.10 0.20 <0.10 Calcium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 61,000 63,000 68,000 68,000 Chromium pg/g 37.3 90 26 110 1.0 6.0 5.7 13 6.0 Hexavalent Chromium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Cobalt Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.10 2.5 2.5 5.9 3.1 Copper pg/g 35.7 197 16 110 0.50 5.9 5.9 16 8.5 Iron pg/g ns ns 20,000 40,000 50 7,500 7,500 16,000 8,500 Lead pg/g 35 91.3 31 250 1.0 4.2 4.3 14 5.3 Magnesium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 13,000 13,000 14,000 14,000 Manganese pg/g ns ns 460 1,100 1.0 270 290 540 360 Mercury Ng/g 0.17 0.486 0.2 2 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Molybdenum pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Nickel pg/g ns ns 16 75 0.50 4.9 5.0 12 6.3 Phosphorus pg/g ns ns 600 2,000 50 750 770 960 620 Potassium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 200 290 300 710 360 Selenium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Silver Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Sodium pg/g ns ns ns ns 100 100 <100 <100 110 Strontium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1.0 73 75 93 83 Thallium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.064 <0.050 Tin Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Tungsten pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 na na <1 na Uranium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 0.24 0.27 0.44 0.28 Vanadium pg/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 11 11 19 11 Zinc pg/g 123 315 120 820 5.0 27 25 56 29 Zirconium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 na na 5 na t Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or SEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram na not analyzed by laboratory BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 10 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - METALS (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES z SEL RDLs 3 SED2-3 SED3-1 SED3-2 SED4-1 Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m bws 6.0-7.5 3.7-4.6 4.6-6.0 1.5 - 1.6 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 65 ppm 10 ppm 50 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.7 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Aluminum pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 7,100 1,700 2,500 4,200 Antimony pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Arsenic pg/g 5.9 17 6 33 1.0 3.6 1.2 1.9 2.0 Barium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 53 11 15 33 Beryllium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 0.38 <0.20 <0.20 0.25 Cadmium Ng/g 0.6 3.5 0.6 10 0.10 0.17 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 Calcium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 77,000 57,000 85,000 58,000 Chromium pg/g 37.3 90 26 110 1.0 12 4.7 5.0 8.1 Hexavalent Chromium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Cobalt Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.10 6.2 1.7 2.7 3.6 Copper pg/g 35.7 197 16 110 0.50 17 3.8 11 9.6 Iron pg/g ns ns 20,000 40,000 50 16,000 5,900 7,800 10,000 Lead pg/g 35 91.3 31 250 1.0 12 2.8 4.2 6.0 Magnesium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 15,000 11,000 19,000 11,000 Manganese pg/g ns ns 460 1,100 1.0 590 210 420 390 Mercury Ng/g 0.17 0.486 0.2 2 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Molybdenum pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Nickel pg/g ns ns 16 75 0.50 13 3.4 5.6 7.8 Phosphorus pg/g ns ns 600 2,000 50 860 640 070' 670; Potassium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 200 750 210 330 470 Selenium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Silver Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Sodium pg/g ns ns ns ns 100 110 <100 110 <100 Strontium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1.0 110 68 110 78 Thallium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 0.072 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Tin Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Tungsten pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 <1 na <1 <1 Uranium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 0.42 0.24 0.32 0.26 Vanadium pg/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 18 9.1 9.0 13 Zinc pg/g 123 315 120 820 5.0 52 16 25 36 Zirconium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 5 na 2 3 t Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or SEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram na not analyzed by laboratory BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 2 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 10 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - METALS (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs 3 SED5-1 SED6-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 Sampling Date 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Reference Area Harbour Reference Area Reference Area Sample Depth m bws 1.5 - 1.6 1.2-1.3 1.0 - 1.1 3.0-3.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.3 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.3 ppm Aluminum pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 1,300 1,300 1,200 1,200 Antimony pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Arsenic pg/g 5.9 17 6 33 1.0 1.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 Barium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 7.9 6.2 5.7 6.7 Beryllium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Cadmium Ng/g 0.6 3.5 0.6 10 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Calcium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 59,000 52,000 81,000 82,000 Chromium pg/g 37.3 90 26 110 1.0 3.3 2.4 8.2 3.5 Hexavalent Chromium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Cobalt Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.10 1.6 1.6 1.9 1.6 Copper pg/g 35.7 197 16 110 0.50 3.0 3.2 2.9 3.6 Iron pg/g ns ns 20,000 40,000 50 5,000 3,700 13,000 4,500 Lead pg/g 35 91.3 31 250 1.0 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.1 Magnesium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 9,500 5,900 14,000 14,000 Manganese pg/g ns ns 460 1,100 1.0 160 150 200 210 Mercury Ng/g 0.17 0.486 0.2 2 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Molybdenum pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Nickel pg/g ns ns 16 75 0.50 3.4 3.7 3.2 3.4 Phosphorus pg/g ns ns 600 2,000 50 550 190 1,600 850 Potassium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 200 <200 <200 <200 <200 Selenium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Silver Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Sodium pg/g ns ns ns ns 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 Strontium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1.0 74 67 95 96 Thallium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Tin Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Tungsten pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Uranium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 0.23 0.18 0.49 0.32 Vanadium pg/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 7.4 <5.0 28 6.8 Zinc pg/g 123 315 120 820 5.0 14 11 34 19 Zirconium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 1 1 1 <1 1 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or SEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram na not analyzed by laboratory BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 3 of 4 Entered by. RA Revie dby: GLL TABLE 10 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - METALS (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs 3 SED9-1 Sampling Date 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Sample Depth m bws 1.0 - 1.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.1 ppm Aluminum pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 6,700 Antimony pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 Arsenic pg/g 5.9 17 6 33 1.0 3.1 Barium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 54 Beryllium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 0.39 Cadmium Ng/g 0.6 3.5 0.6 10 0.10 0.17 Calcium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 65,000 Chromium pg/g 37.3 90 26 110 1.0 11 Hexavalent Chromium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.2 <0.2 Cobalt Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.10 5.3 Copper pg/g 35.7 197 16 110 0.50 15 Iron pg/g ns ns 20,000 40,000 50 15,000 Lead pg/g 35 91.3 31 250 1.0 9.0 Magnesium pg/g ns ns ns ns 50 12,000 Manganese pg/g ns ns 460 1,100 1.0 560 Mercury Ng/g 0.17 0.486 0.2 2 0.050 <0.050 Molybdenum pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 Nickel pg/g ns ns 16 75 0.50 12 Phosphorus pg/g ns ns 600 2,000 50 810 Potassium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 200 750 Selenium pg/g ns ns ns ns 0.50 <0.50 Silver Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.20 <0.20 Sodium pg/g ns ns ns ns 100 120 Strontium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1.0 92 Thallium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 0..068 Tin Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 <5.0 Tungsten pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 <1 Uranium Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.050 0.35 Vanadium pg/g ns ns ns ns 5.0 17 Zinc pg/g 123 315 120 820 5.0 51 Zirconium pg/g ns ns ns ns 1 4 1 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or SEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram na not analyzed by laboratory BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 4 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 11 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - Inorganics, Nutrients, and pH Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 SEL RDLs s SED1-1 SED10-1 Field Duplicate of SED1-1 SED1-3 SED2-1 Sampling Date VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m bws 3.0-4.5 3.0-4.5 6.0-7.5 3.1-4.5 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 40 ppm 40 ppm 40 ppm 25 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Total Ammonia -N pg/g ns ns ns ns 25 <25 <25 252 68 chloride pg/g ns ns ns ns 20 <20 <20 23 <20 fluoride Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 Nitrate (N) pg/g ns ns ns ns 2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Nitrite (N) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Nitrate + Nitrite Ng/g ns ns ns ns 3 <3 <3 <3 <3 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) pg/g ns ns 550 4,800 10 321 459 1,490 500 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/kg ns ns 10,000 100,000 500 7,800 6,900 14,000 6,400 Sulphate (SO4) Ng/g ns ns 600 2,000 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 pH pH units ns ns ns ns 7.12 7.12 7.45 7.09 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients, Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 11 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - Inorganics, Nutrients, and pH (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 SEL RDLs s SED2-3 SED3-1 SED3-2 SED4-1 Sampling Date VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Sample Depth m bws 6.0-7.5 3.7-4.6 4.6-6.0 1.5 - 1.6 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 65 ppm 10 ppm 50 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.7 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm Total Ammonia -N pg/g ns ns ns ns 25 197 <25 184 59 chloride pg/g ns ns ns ns 20 <20 21 <20 30 fluoride Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5 5 <5 <5 <5 Nitrate (N) pg/g ns ns ns ns 2 <2 <2 <2 4 Nitrite (N) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Nitrate + Nitrite Ng/g ns ns ns ns 3 <3 <3 <3 4 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) pg/g ns ns 550 4,800 10 1,010 217 177 784 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/kg ns ns 10,000 100,000 500 12,000 4,300 9,500 12;000 Sulphate (SO4) Ng/g ns ns 600 2,000 20 <20 <20 71 <20 pH pH units ns ns ns ns 7.47 7.25 7.75 7.13 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients, Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 2 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 11 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - Inorganics, Nutrients, and pH (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs s SED5-1 SED6-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 Sampling Date VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Reference Area Harbour Reference Area Reference Area Sample Depth m bws 1.5-1.6 1.2 - 1.3 1.0 - 1.1 3.0-3.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.3 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.3 ppm Total Ammonia -N pg/g ns ns ns ns 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 chloride pg/g ns ns ns ns 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 fluoride Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 Nitrate (N) pg/g ns ns ns ns 2 <2 <2 <2 <2 Nitrite (N) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Nitrate + Nitrite Ng/g ns ns ns ns 3 <3 <3 <3 <3 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) pg/g ns ns 550 4,800 10 127 83 40 48 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/kg ns ns 10,000 100,000 500 5,100 3,100 8,200 7,600 Sulphate (SO4) Ng/g ns ns 600 2,000 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 pH pH units ns ns ns ns - 7.71 7.69 7.70 7.72 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients, Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 3 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 11 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - Inorganics, Nutrients, and pH (CONTINUED) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' SEL RDLs s SED9-1 Sampling Date Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Sample Depth m bws 1.0 - 1.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.1 ppm Total Ammonia -N pg/g ns ns ns ns 25 <25 chloride pg/g ns ns ns ns 20 35 fluoride Ng/g ns ns ns ns 5 <5 Nitrate (N) pg/g ns ns ns ns 2 <2 Nitrite (N) Ng/g ns ns ns ns 0.5 <0.5 Nitrate + Nitrite Ng/g ns ns ns ns 3 <3 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) pg/g ns ns 550 4,800 10 802 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/kg ns ns 10,000 100,000 500 14,000 Sulphate (SO4) Ng/g ns ns 600 2,000 20 <20 pH pH units ns ns ns ns - 7.41 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 1: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Metals and Nutrients, Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) Reportable detection limit (RDL) m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL - Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 4 of 4 Entered by. RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 12 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS - ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES and PCBs Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' ISQG CCME SEDIMENT GUIDELINES' PEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 LEL MOE SEDIMENT GUIDELINES 2 SEL RDLs 3 SED1-1 SED10-1 Field Duplicate of SED1-1 SED1-3 SED2-1 SED2-3 SED3-1 SED3-2 SED5-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 06 -Dec -12 Sample Location Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Harbour Reference Area Reference Area Reference Area Sample Depth mbws 3.0-4.5 3.0-4.5 6.0-7.5 3.1-4.5 6.0-7.5 3.7-4.6 4.6-6.0 1.5-1.6 1.0-1.1 3.0-3.1 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns ns 40 ppm 40 ppm 40 ppm 25 ppm 65 ppm 10 ppm 50 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm <10 ppm CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns ns - 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.1 ppm 0.7 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.2 ppm 0.3 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.3 ppm Aldrin ug/g ns ns 0.002 8 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Benzenehexachloride,alpha- (alpha -BHC) ug/g ns ns 0.006 10 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Benzenehexachloride,beta- (beta -BHC) ug/g ns ns 0.005 21 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Benzenehexachloride,delta- (delta -BHC) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Chlordane, a- ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Chlordane, g- ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 0.0020 <0.0020 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Chlordane (total) ug/g 0.0045 0.00887 0.007 6 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 0.0020 <0.0020 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, o,p'- (o,p'-DDD) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 0.0030 0.0030 0.0070 <0.0020 0.0080 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, p,p'- (p,p'-DDD) ug/g ns ns 0.008 6 0.0020 0.0090 0.0080 0.021 <0.0020 0.022 0.0040 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (total) (o,p'-+ p,p'-DDD) ug/g 0.00354 0.00851 ns ns 0.0020 0.012 0.011 0.028 <0.0020 0.030 0.0040 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, o,p'- (o,p'-DDE) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, p,p'- (p,p'-DDE) ug/g ns ns 0.005 19 0.0020 0.019 0.016 0.033 0.0040 0.035 0.0050 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (total) (o,p'-+ p,p'-DDE) ug/g 0.00142 0.00675 ns ns 0.0020 0.019 0.016 0.033 0.0040 0.035 0.0050 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, o,p'- (o,p'-DDT) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, p,p'- (p,p'-DDT) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 0.0030 0.0020 0.0060 <0.0020 0.0050 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (total) (o,p'-+ p,p'-DDT) ug/g ns ns 0.008 71 0.0020 0.0030 0.0020 0.0060 <0.0020 0.0050 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 DDT (total) 4 ug/g 0.00119 0.00477 0.007 12 - 0.0340 0.0290 0.0670 0.0040 0.070 0.0090 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 DDT + Metabolites ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0030 0.034 0.029 0.0670 0.0040 0.070 0.0090 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 Dieldrin ug/g 0.00285 0.00667 0.002 91 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endosulfan I (alpha) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endosulfan II (beta) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endosulfan sulphate ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endosulfan (total) ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endrin ug/g 0.00267 0.0624 0.003 130 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endrin aldehyde ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Endrin ketone ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Heptachlor ug/g 0.0006 0.00274 ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Heptachlor epoxide ug/g ns ns 0.005 5 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Hexachlorobenzene ug/g ns ns 0.02 24 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Hexachlorobutadiene ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Hexachloroethane ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Lindane, (gamma -BHC; Hexachlorocyclohexane) ug/g 0.00094 0.00138 0.003 1 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Methoxychlor ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0050 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Mirex (Dechlorane) ug/g ns ns 0.007 130 0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 Octachlorostyrene ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.0020 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Toxaphene ug/g 0.0001 ns ns ns 0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 Polychlorinated biphenyls (total) (PCBs) ug/g 0.0341 0.277 0.07 530 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1016 ug/g ns ns 0.007 53 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1221 ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1232 ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1242 ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1248 ug/g ns ns 0.03 150 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1254 ug/g 0.006 0.34 0.06 34 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1260 ug/g ns ns 0.005 24 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1262 ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Aroclor 1268 ug/g ns ns ns ns 0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 ' Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012); Chapter 6 Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for the Protection of Aquatic Life for freshwater provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table; Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) and Probable Effect Levels (PELs) 2 Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Ontario: An Integrated Approach (May 2008); Table 2a: Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (PSQGs) for Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs, Lowest Effect Levels (LELs) and Severe Effect Levels (SELs) 3 Reportable detection limit (RDL) 4 Total DDT is the sum of the concentrations of op' -DDT, p,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDE, o,p'-DDE, op' -DDD, and p,p'-DDD as per the SQGs for the Protection of Aquatic Life m bws Metres below water surface CV Reading Combustible vapour reading (ppm) ppm Parts per million (by volume) ns No ISQG, PEL, LEL or PEL (as applicable) pg/g Micrograms per gram BOLD Exceeds CCME ISQG BOLD Exceeds CCME PEL VALUE Exceeds MOE LEL -Exceeds MOE SEL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Reviewed by. GLL TABLE 13 WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units ENV CAN FIGQGs' CCME CWQGs-PAL FRESHWATER 2 MOE TABLE 9 STANDARDS3 RDLs MW 101 MW 102 5 MW 103 MW 104 Field Duplicate ofMW103 FIELD BLANK TRIP BLANK Sampling Date - - - - - 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns 25 ppm 50 ppm 12% LEL 12% LEL CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns - 0.3 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.0 ppm 0.0 ppm - - Benzene pg/L 690 370 44 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Toluene pg/L 83 2 14,000 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Ethylbenzene pg/L 11,000 90 1,800 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Xylenes (total) pg/L 18,000 ns 3,300 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F1 pg/L 9,100 ns 420 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F2 pg/L 1,300 ns 150 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F3 pg/L ns ns 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F4 pg/L ns ns 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 1 Environment Canada Guidance Document on Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Federal Contaminated Sites (November 2012), hereinafter referred to as FIGQG; Table 3 Tier 1 Generic Guidelines for coarse-grained soils in Commercial and Industrial Land Uses 2 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012), hereinafter referred to as CEQG; Chapter 4 Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CWQG-PAL) for Freshwater (FW) provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table 3 MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV. f of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Table 9 Non -Potable Groundwater Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in All Types of Property Use 4 Reportable detection limit (RDL) 5 Monitoring Well is located within 10 m of a water body ns No FIGQG, CWQG-PAL, or MOE Standard (as applicable) CV Reading Combustible vapour reading in well headspace (ppm or % LEL) ppm Parts per million (by volume) LEL Percent of the lower explosive limit pg/L Micrograms per litre BOLD Exceeds FIGQG or CWQG-PAL (FW), as applicable VALUE Exceeds MOE Table 9 Standard TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Revie dby. GLL TABLE 14 WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS - POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units ENV CAN FIGQGs' CCME CWQGs-PAL FRESHWATER z MOE TABLE 9 STANDARDS' RDLS 4 MW101 MW1025 MW103 MW104 Field Duplicate of MW103 Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns 25 ppm 50 ppm 12% LEL 12% LEL CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns - 0.3 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.0 ppm 0.0 ppm Acenaphthene pg/L 5.8 5.8 600 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Acenaphthylene pg/L 46 ns 1.4 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Acridine pg/L 0.05 4.4 ns 0.032 <0.032 <0.032 <0.032 <0.032 Anthracene pg/L 0.0126 0.0126 1 0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 Benzo[a]anthracene pg/L 0.018 "7 0.018 6 1.8 0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 Benzo[b]fluoranthene pg/L 0.48 ns 0.75 0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 Benzo[k]fluoranthene pg/L 0.48 ns 0.4 0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene pg/L 0.1767 ns 0.2 0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 Benzo[c]phenanthrene pg/L ns ns ns 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Benzo[a]pyrene pg/L 0.015 0.015 0.81 0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 Benzo[e]pyrene pg/L ns ns ns 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Chrysene pg/L 1.4 7 ns 0.7 0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene pg/L 0.26 7 ns 0.4 0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 Fluoranthene pg/L 0.04 6 0.04 6 73 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 Fluorene Ng/L 3 6 3 6 290 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene pg/L 0.217 ns 0.2 0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 Methylnapthalene, 1- pg/L ns ns 1,800 0.10 <0.10 6 <0.10 6 <0.10 6 <0.10 6 Methylnapthalene, 2- pg/L ns ns 1,500 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Methylnapthalene, 1- & 2- (total) pg/L 180 ns 1,800 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Napthalene pg/L 1.16 1.16 1,400 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Perylene (Dibenz[de,kl]anthracene) pg/L ns ns ns 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Phenanthrene pg/L 0.4 0.4 380 0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 Pyrene pg/L 0.025 6 0.025 6 6 0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.20 Quinoline (Benzopyridine) pg/L 3.4 3.4 ns 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Environment Canada Guidance Document on Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Federal Contaminated Sites (November 2012), hereinafter referred to as FIGQG; Table 3 Tier 1 Generic Guidelines for coarse-grained soils in Commercial and Industrial Land Uses Z Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012), hereinafter referred to as CEQG; Chapter 4 Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CWQG-PAL) for Freshwater (FW) provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table 3 MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV 1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Table 9 Non -Potable Groundwater Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in All Types of Property Use 4 Reportable detection limit (RDL) 5 Monitoring Well is located within 10 m of a water body 6 FIGQG or CWQG-PAL (FW) is less than the MOE Table 1 Full Depth Background Site Condition Standard for groundwater 7 For ecological receptors only 8 Concentration of 1-Methylnapthalene was determined by laboratory via visual inspection of sample chromatograms. Detection limit was set equivalent to 2-Methylnapthalene concentration. ns No FIGQG, CWQG-PAL, or MOE Standard (as applicable) CV Reading Combustible vapour reading in well headspace (ppm or % LEL) ppm Parts per million (by volume) % LEL Percent of the lower explosive limit N9/L Micrograms per litre BOLD Exceeds FIGQG or CWQG-PAL (FW), as applicable VALUE Exceeds MOE Table 9 Standard PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by. RA Revi-dby. GLL TABLE 15 WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS - METALS, HARDNESS, and pH Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Terrapex Sample Name Units ENV CAN FIGQGs' CCME CWQGs-PAL FRESHWATER' MOE TABLE 9 STANDARDS' RDLs ° MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 Field Duplicate of MW103 Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note ns ns ns 25 ppm 50 ppm 12% LEL 12% LEL CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note ns ns ns - 0.3 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.0 ppm 0.0 ppm Aluminum pg/L 5-100' 5-100a ns 1.0 1.2 1.4 2.2 2 Antimony pg/L 2,000 ns 16,000 0.60 <0.60 <0.60 <0.60 <0.60 Arsenic pg/L 5 7 5 7 1,500 0.20 3.3 8_4 4.1 4.5 Barium pg/L 500 ns 23,000 10 97 150 110 120 Beryllium pg/L 5.3 ns 53 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Boron pg/L 5,000 1,500 - 29,000' a 36,000 20 82 77 41 38 Cadmium pg/L 0.0177 0.017''9 2.1 0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 Calcium pg/L ns ns ns 300 100,000 190,000 200,000 210,000 Chromium (total) pg/L 8.9 ns 640 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Chromium, hexavalent pg/L ns 1 110 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Cobalt pg/L ns ns 52 0.30 1.1 0.75 0.60 0.63 Copper pg/L 2-4 7, 10 2-4 7,10 69 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.73 0.70 Iron pg/L 300 300 ns 60 4,300 77,700 20,000 22,000 Lead pg/L 1 - 7 7, 11 1-7 7, 11 20 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Magnesium Ng/L ns ns ns 200 12,000 13,000 28,000 29,000 Manganese pg/L ns ns ns 4.0 640 950 1,800 1,800 Mercury pg/L 0.016 0.026 0.29 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Molybdenum pg/L 73 73 7,300 0.20 4.1 4.7 0.73 0.64 Nickel pg/L 25-150 12 25-150 12 390 0.50 1.7 0.98 <0.50 <0.50 Phosphorus pg/L ns ns ns 100 <100 <100 810 790 Potassium pg/L ns ns ns 300 2,300 2,800 4,900 5,200 Selenium pg/L 17 17 50 0.20 0.31 <0.20 0.37 0.36 Silicon pg/L ns ns ns 100 5,700 6,900 11,000 12,000 Silver pg/L 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 Sodium pg/L ns ns 1,800,000 500 41,000 13,000 4,300 4,500 Strontium pg/L ns ns ns 20 240 720 610 630 Thallium pg/L 0.8 0.8 400 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 Tin pg/L ns ns ns 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Titanium pg/L 100 ns ns 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Tungsten pg/L ns ns ns 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Uranium pg/L 150 15 - 33'3 330 0.10 0.36 0.23 0.75 0.74 Vanadium Ng/L ns ns 200 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Zinc pg/L 107 307 890 3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 Zirconium pg/L ns ns ns 3.0 <3.014 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 Hardness (CaCO3) mg/L ns ns ns 0.5 300 510 690 680 pH pH units 6.5 to 8.7 6.5 to 9.0 ns - 7.30 7.30 6.89 6.91 PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 2 Entered by. RA Revie dby. GLL Environment Canada Guidance Document on Federal Interim Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Federal Contaminated Sites (November 2012), hereinafter referred to as FIGQG; Table 3 Tier 1 Generic Guidelines for coarse-grained soils in Commercial and Industrial Land Uses 2 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012), hereinafter referred to as CEQG; Chapter 4 Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CWQG-PAL) for Freshwater (FW) provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table 3 MOE Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011); Table 9 Non -Potable Groundwater Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in All Types of Property Use 4 Reportable detection limit (RDL) 5 Monitoring Well is located within 10 m of a water body 6 CWQG-PAL (FW) is 5 pg/L at pH <6.5 or 100 pg/L at pH z6.5; FIGQGs calculated by multiplying the corresponding CWQG-PAL (FW) by the Dilution Factor 4 (DF4); a value of 1 was used for DF4 FIGQG or CWQG-PAL (FW) is less than the MOE Table 1 Full Depth Background Site Condition Standard for groundwater e Long -Term Exposure CWQG-PAL (FW) for boron is 1,500 pg/L and Short -Term Exposure CWQG-PAL (FW) is 29,000 pg/L; boron concentrations compared to 1,500 pg/L for long-term exposure 9 0.017 pg/L is the applicable CWQG-PAL (FW) for cadmium at a water hardness of 48.5 mg/L; refer to Table16 for the sample -specific, hardness -related CWQGs-PAL (FW) calculated for cadmium 10 CWQG-PAL (FW) is 2, 3, or 4 pg/L at water hardness of 0-120,120-180, or >180 mg/L, respectively; FIGQGs calculated by multiplying the corresponding CWQG-PAL (FW) by a DF4 of 1 11 CWQG-PAL (FW) is 1, 2, 4, or 7 pg/L at water hardness of 0-60, 60-120,120-180, or>180 mg/L, respectively; FIGQGs calculated by multiplying the corresponding CWQG-PAL (FW) by a DF4 of 1 12 CWQG-PAL (FW) is 25, 65, 110, or 150 pg/L at water hardness of 0-60, 60-120,120-180, or >180 mg/L, respectively; FIGQGs calculated by multiplying the corresponding CWQG-PAL (FW) by a DF4 of 1 13 Long -Term Exposure CWQG-PAL (FW) for uranium is 15 pg/L and Short -Term Exposure CWQG-PAL (FW) is 33 pg/L; uranium concentrations compared to 15 pg/L for long-term exposure 14 Laboratory reported that the matrix spike exceeds acceptance limits due to matrix interference; re -analysis yielded similar results ns No FIGQG, CWQG-PAL, or MOE Standard (as applicable) CV Reading Combustible vapour reading in well headspace reported in parts per million (ppm) or percent of the lower explosive limit (% LEL) pg/L, mg/L Micrograms per litre, milligrams per litre BOLD Exceeds FIGQG or CWQG-PAL (FW), as applicable VALUE Exceeds MOE Table 9 Standard PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 2 of 2 Entered by: RA Reviewed by: GLL TABLE 16 WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS - CADMIUM Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Terrapex Sample Name MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 RDL ' Field Duplicate of MW 103 Units Sampling Date 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 05 -Dec -12 CV Reading (Gastechtor - Methane Elimination) see note 25 ppm 50 ppm 12% LEL 12% LEL CV Reading (Photoionization Detector) see note - 0.3 ppm 0.4 ppm 0.0 ppm 0.0 ppm Hardness (CaCO3) mg/L 0.5 300 510 690 680 Calculated CWQGs-PAL (FW) for Cadmium 2'1 pg/L - 0.088 ° 0.134 4 0.174 ° 0.172 4 Cadmium pg/L 0.0050 <0.0050 1 <0.0050 1 <0.0050 1 <0.0050 Reportable detection limit (RDL) 2 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (1999, updated 2012), hereinafter referred to as CEQG; Chapter 4 Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CWQG-PAL) for Freshwater (FW) provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table 3 Sample -specific, hardness -related CWQGs-PAL (FW) calculated for cadmium utilizing the equation provided in the on-line CCME CEQG Summary Table ° FIGQGs calculated by multiplying the corresponding CWQG-PAL (FW) by the Dilution Factor 4 (DF4); a value of 1 was used for DF4 CV Reading Combustible vapour reading in well headspace (ppb, ppm, or % LEL) ppm Parts per million (by volume) % LEL Percent of the lower explosive limit mg/L Milligrams per litre pg/L Micrograms per litre BOLD Exceeds Calculated CWQG-PAL (FW) or AGOG PWGSC Project No.R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by: RA TABLE 17 SUMMARY OF CONTAMINATED SITES Reviewed by: GLL Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario CS# Source Contaminants NCSCS/ASCS Supporting Extent of Description Score/Class Documentation Impacted Media CS0001 Contamination resulting from Petroleum NCSCS - 56.8/2 PAHs (Methlynapthalene CS0001 encompasses the historical storage and handling Hydrocarbons (PHCs) (1-, 2-, & 1- & 2- total), land and infilled portions of of coal, potash, fertilizer, fuel Napthalene, the subject site. oil, and railway activities and Metals Phenanthrene, and Index current handling and storage of of Additve Cancer Risk Impacted media includes soil fuel from offsite sources on Polycyclic Aromatic (IACR)) exceedances in and groundwater. APEC 2. Hydrocarbons (PAHs) soil (Phase II ESA). PHC F2 exceedance in soil (Phase II ESA). Metals (Iron and Arsenic) exceedancesin groundwater (Phase II ESA). CS# Source Contaminants NCSCS/ASCS Supporting Extent of Description Score/Class Documentation Impacted Media CS0002 Contamination resulting from Metals/Inorganics ASCS - 79.4/1 PAHs (Acenapthalene, CS0002 encompasses the historical storage and handling Benzo(a)anthracene, inner harbour of Port Burwell of coal, potash, fertilizer, fuel PHCs Benzo(a)pyrene, SCH and portion of Big Otter oil, and railway activities Phenanthrene, and Creek. associated offsite sources at PAHs Pyrene) exceedances in APEC 2 and APEC 3. sediment (Phase II ESA). Impacted media includes Organochlorine sediment. Pesticides (OCPs) PHC F3 exceedances in sediment (Phase II ESA). Metals/Inorganics (Manganese,Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) and Total Organic Carbon (TOC)) exceedances in sediment (Phase II ESA). OCPs (p,p'-DDD, Total o,p' + p,p'-DDD, p#- DDE,Total o,p'- +p,p'- DDE, and total DDT) exceedances in sediment (Phase II ESA). PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 APPENDIX I FEDERAL PROPERTY DOCUMENTS 1+1 Canada Property Report for Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour - DFRP 54022 Site and Property Information: Municipality: Bayham Latitude: 42.639855 +/- 200m (from DFRP) Longitude: -80.805650 +/- 200m (from DFRP) The Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour includes part of the bed of Big Otter Creek, part of the bed of Lake Erie and some land not covered by water. Subject Property Owner's Name: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, DFO Address: N/A Property Description: Port Burwell is one of the public harbours that became the property of Canada by virtue of Section 108 and the Third Schedule of the Constitution Act, 1867; later ratified and approved by the Ontario Harbours Agreement Act, 1963. The Land Registry Office has no record of the Federal Crown's ownership and therefore no Land Registry Office PIN was created. Real Property Geomatics Services Page - 1 - Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ontario Region Dated July 13, 2012 1+1 Canada Property Report for Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) The property can be described in accordance with 2 reference plans, as follows: Parts 2, 6 and 7 on Plan 11 R-6760 and Part 1 on Plan 11 R-7468, which is shaded orange on the attached pdf copies of the plans. It should be noted that the ownership of Part 1 on Plan 11 R-6760, which is shaded green on the attached pdf copy of the plan, is uncertain and further investigation is required to determine if the Federal Crown has an interest in this property. It should also be noted that Parts 3, 4 and 5 on Plan 11 R-6760, which are shaded blue on the attached pdf copy of the plan, were created to represent easements in favour of the Federal Crown for the anchorage of the walls. The Land Registry Office records do not reflect these easements and therefore, while they may exist on the ground, there is no registered federal interest in these properties. Property size: The area Parts 2, 6 and 7 on Plan 11 R-6760 and Part 1 on Plan 11 R-7468, in accordance with information shown on the plans, is 78.27 ha. A separate area of land not covered by water is not available. Note: This report deals only with property ownership and not the ownership of any structures on the property. Property Owner Contact: Mark Sandeman, Area Manager, Client Services Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Property and Operations 3027 Harvester Road, Unit 506 Burlington, Ontario L7R 4K3 905-639-2050 Mark. Sandeman(a)dfo-mpo.gc.ca Attachments: Google Maps showing property location Marked -up copy of Plan 11 R-6760 Marked -up copy of Plan 11 R-7468 Real Property Geomatics Services Page - 2 - Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ontario Region Dated July 13, 2012 Port Burwell - Google Maps Go4 toile Address Port Burwell, ON NorwuiO H rant Burford 2a Page 1 of 1 0 Delhi Simcae Q 2a Big Creel National ©2012 Google - Map data ©2012 Google - http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Port+Burwell&aq=... 2012/07/13 Port Burwell - Google Maps Go c)sle Address Port Burwell, ON CY o � � .TI 8 m a r s� zp P O Wellinon 6t � Grp &ackSt BU Weli ciml Perk %'4 Page 1 of 1 Gk�n *k� L'�' e rl,,,d¢z ©2012 Google - Map data ©2012 Google - http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Port+Burwell&aq=... 2012/07/13 DETAIL "C" NOT TO SCALE i-- . — - -- / l c '�' 2 �'( ./ % _1�L C) / , ,;� " , .-I - , IQ 4�1 \ I I I , ".) .� WLSTE 1" _Y EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERN "� �� LIMIT QF WATERLOO STREET BETWEEN L°�'yyl081i 15CN AND ERiEL,S STREETS N 89' ars' S W (S) -_ '- \� B9' 30' ' :Y' 4d /\ /' "'-1.92 1 81.97 - ,+ r <. / / i \� / Cl) I/ l re tq � 1. DETAIL D Co o �� `a �"� 1 , NOT TO SCALE / �, ,\)' <� " r �>ti / �) ", �1 - r 0 �L L` / �I ) - ,. ' i --I I Q r I L Y r. '�.�/` L-I _ N 88' 04' 20" W to C . / 00" WATER'S'_ OF STEEL DOCK - �C 1 L r', , a x 1 :2 tn EDGE �. ,fit) 0 18.3 7 Co O) 1, LIC F_ N f �p 3 985 r- \13 L I + Ln L� /,� L�,,'tl \a 3 &, Ivl) 7 j. 41b A 0. . r CL tP }018.2,, P7' � '� > 0 110 1 -, �!� ,ox ��r�, 1 -19. 2'x' 20" E o Co n day � � \_ u0, 1 is i C) LN c6 . J, 2.78 z 2,, C PART I Q rn a) O oN. y F l '_)/;r�1 C] .� I ri L, JJr{ C1�rlls I- z W Ln_ \0� 5 li to _; . 0 4n - p� til Q -� li s0 0 ' . ' - y r r Cq o 0 � �.� s_ S_ l \ti\ -: , : `4 SP � �,�- A I ti, .vz' a 12.19 as - U -' LL C � S - 4 1� `� { w — F o L^) U i � � _ ,.':,' 'P8 & ,49. ' -_ 53. '=, (P8 o M) F- 1 c. -�1 a h{I i N 88' A S S 40" W (M) ivL'} f u'. �* N 88' 45' 40" N, ti (S) 1 `_l E. � w `9. I` - ' �' Ny} 4.16 (P3 do S, 1 rn i IJ Q r_ < II S1 0} CL I I ra + C) y �) �o C' 11Q t� �? I LLI "' N "J�, i' 't5_' 1(rj � -+ X,-61 it a llil z "'S_MUk{E!T � .; L 0C� � a NF 36441C, 1-1-1 �� N 88' 46' 10" W r, tl } be N 84' 56'(A z { to W) a_ 0- �_1 _ 42.88 I-- 9.7 & M) �__ - DETAIL "C" NOT TO SCALE i-- . — - -- / l c '�' 2 �'( ./ % _1�L C) / , ,;� " , .-I - , IQ 4�1 \ I I I , ".) .� WLSTE 1" _Y EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERN "� �� LIMIT QF WATERLOO STREET BETWEEN L°�'yyl081i 15CN AND ERiEL,S STREETS N 89' ars' S W (S) -_ '- \� B9' 30' ' :Y' 4d /\ /' "'-1.92 1 81.97 - ,+ r <. / / i \� / Cl) I/ l re tq � 1. DETAIL D Co o �� `a �"� 1 , NOT TO SCALE / �, ,\)' <� " r �>ti / �) ", �1 - r 0 �L L` / �I ) - ,. ' i --I I Q r I N of CL DETAIL "E" NOT TQ SC" DE I_.AIL, "F„ NOT TO SL:ALE 11 L Y r. '�.�/` L-I _ N 88' 04' 20" W to C . / 00" FACF OF STEEL DOCK - �C 1 L r', , a x 1 :2 tn Q �. U a) w 0 ^ _ Q 0 18.3 7 Co O) 1, LIC F_ N f Ia).. I + Ln L� /,� _a, U L, =c' 61 41b A 0. . r CL , c L` = 0 1 ('-6 L: 0 110 1 -, �!� ,ox ��r�, 1 ,�, ��� o Co n day � � \_ u0, `����y4 �P , � ,� \. - U �1 i� (D2 C) LN c6 . o 0 z 2,, C PART I Q rn a) O oN. y F & " C. } _ � I- z w \0� 5 li s° a 4n 1 iz' - '1 til Q -� � o , � y �f _ti) Cq D - < I � r7 P , p � �,�- A I ti, .vz' a 12.19 as - U -' LL ��,�� '� 1� `� { z YAPT 2, :-�__ /\ F o '" i � � L 8.90 � J� r- 6 F- v� C, 4 w _._ �a .� W_ `_l E. � w `9. I` - 2 s) 7 : �a :__ z Q r_ < CL pfd r. ccr L �o C' - X, � U N of CL DETAIL "E" NOT TQ SC" DE I_.AIL, "F„ NOT TO SL:ALE 11 L Y r. '�.�/` L-I _ N 88' 04' 20" W to C . 1 00" 2' l 4 �C 1 L r', , a x 1 :2 tn Q �. U a) w 0 ^ _ Q 0 18.3 7 Co O) 1, LIC F_ N f O t M W 0 LI' .a S)o Ln L� 684 Q U L, =c' 61 I Ld r CL , c L` = 0 1 ('-6 L: 0 110 1 -, �!� _. Lcl U r-< 1 i o C 12.19 >-- W I M) (59., 9 P3) � 1 Q `` (D2 & S) . z 212.03 o 0 z o � w U Ix - PART I /e r. l . PLAN lJR--ilJ,�6 °6�r `-,'I) C. Ef) �l w ZE 13 26 � 4n ' �,\0 til N7 4 r 12.4 '- ' � i..) LL0 U a ..- Ln r; ,.-1,.• 52, 10" W 62.8'' -O ' , Y.- L� ,8.64 Y 8.79 \� V - ----- 'L 6,79 r a 7". c - ' A I D o/_ -c; , 2 !SL 11� - �0 .. 0 I-) -1,25B 3� 7 ' '� 1� `� { 9 L,. YAPT 2, :-�__ /\ Z \0 2 44 -.�--__ _ 1 �11 On t- L 8.90 � J� r- 6 :... x 4 a6 4 I` J 1, CO C ESSJON' _._ �a .� c� T n - I` - 2 s) 7 : �a :__ z 0 r_ 7.1.34 N of CL DETAIL "E" NOT TQ SC" DE I_.AIL, "F„ NOT TO SL:ALE 11 L Y r. '�.�/` L-I _ N 88' 04' 20" W ,' Cl(.V1d 1 00" 2' l 4 �C 1 L C,.+ 1 :2 U Q �. i _y 0 18.3 ,t3 5 1, LIC ti 1 ! `:_ LI' .a S)o Ln L� 684 zt -4 71.5'1 (' X0 L, =c' 61 I a r , - ) Ltt' - Z ('-6 L: 19 1 -, �!� 00" 1 40.21 > \6 J S 18.64 >_j_ 1 3.27 (M) N'-< 0 - - - N 88' 51' Zit" 1L,( 5€ 85 M) (59., 9 P3) � 1 (3.13 P3 ) `` 7 � `= z 212.03 198' 51' 20" W (S;I z o � w U Ix - PART I /e r. , c � C, (' L,,-1 PLAN lJR--ilJ,�6 °6�r `-,'I) C. ,J� �l w ZE L) INSTRUMFNT 364410 4n ., ;' F-) N 88' 52' 1p" ,. (S) - '- ' � i..) LL0 U a ..- ;rl p r; ,.-1,.• 52, 10" W 62.8'' (ml) (63.06 '3) >-_ ' , Y.- t 111'_ ,8.64 Y 8.79 \� V - ----- 'L 6,79 r in 0 G ' A I \0 �, 5.74 (3.17 ')) .. 0 INSTRUMFNT -1,25B 3� � --; ' UNREGISTERED EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 28, 1948 :O, 5. l9 S) c' C' F c 9 L,. YAPT 2, :-�__ /\ . JR -100G ` ��3 :_ 0 S] 1.00 (A1 & m)( '` ,� rC.N L 6 :... CL R' 7R• �S,• 2 p I, -.: 4 I` J 1, CO C ESSJON' 1, rAY;.lAJ\/1 > V/ z W �0 1 c� 1, _ 4 ('s - I` - z w " __ 1 r 1 A� BEARINGI N 88' 04' 20" W 1 I- , . C 00" 3.05 (P3 & M) 7 35.36 } C,.+ i T :2 W Q �. ./1,� y -_,c'/' = Lf) n 18.3 ME 1, LIC C`_y ! `:_ � r 112.54 �_:-; 684 N ' cr) ,-) f t � W. 1 1481) 668 I a U \� 61 to o 1�yW) �7 A L , F 19 1 c tq 00" �; qq" Jul '.11 DENOTES r �" I 2 rn eq J. D. BARNES OLS. 7 _, `= z 212.03 iL; z o � w U Ix - FEN(X •'', CL L.. t') n < a o ON Ln1E N�- 0 LL1 W ,J� 0 o w ZE U 40" 4n :r C - ;' F-) 125 S5 {M ) 081 0 0 � i..) LL0 U 5`'\10 ` ;rl p o `'L . 1 T � - ,8.64 Y 8.79 \� V - ----- 'L 6,79 r in 0 G ' A I C ;' 25.44 (P1 & M 1 Wiz_ � It 00" N 84' 55' 20" 0.so - / 409.90 UNREGISTERED EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 28, 1948 w -, DENOTES -- `�fl i Nr 84' 55 2_0" W I � _1 _a, �, C' 0 S] 1.00 (A1 & m)( '` ,� 1 - () CON � :... CL R' 7R• �S,• 2 p I, U n INSTRUMENT 11) - /+� 0.50 ' - 0 (.V1) w I c� -, r, N I` - z w " __ 1 r pfd r. ccr L �o C' X, � U LLI "' N "J�, i' 't5_' 1(rj � -+ X,-61 it �� z "'S_MUk{E!T � . w 0C� � a NF 36441C, 1-1-1 �� N 88' 46' 10" W r, I DETAIL"G" NOT 10 "ALL DETAIL "I" NOT TO SCALE 05 \ }JESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERN C(/ .C5 LIMIT OF WATERLOO STREET BETWEEN - � ;, I REQUIRE THIS PLAN TO BE PLAN 11 R— (_740 Q IC,• IlOH1NSON AND ERIEUS STREETS zz F- I- o DEPOS#TED UNDER THE REGISTRY > 163') U _3 o ACT ,� � X40 c, / � I, ��� RECFIVFn AND DEPOSITED FEBRUARY 9 1998 eq ♦ �� DATE ----------- '----- DATE -_ --- -9..♦-_ _1__,_1 L I - r 1\ It1 � -.h �,1a PC) y1 L4 .� �1 r, �, ' �_ I ``0 N 89 30' Sa" w e CT1 0, q \� ltj �y L �����J`M� 98.78 (M) `�� . - •� J 1� t S r // . I }r-', �1✓R x'10 S J 1 __.1 , L1 ------------------� -____ M *-O. JAW J��o�,�' ,,, - v / "= B9' 30'- aC) 14' (S�, �- \Q ,92-45 (M) �-I (REGISTERED PLAN 12) c,�0 -- ---- THE 4 t� _ . ------- REGISTRY DIMSION I OF ELGIN y 58.57 . 30.71 � + � .,'.- C 8, .9 i > 100.63 I ^•{' I 1 ( } S. HS^ (NO. 11) ?' ark ` g� ,yo . �Ci� 2 i +r - I Si N 89' 30' =,G" W � r r S E.' I � DETAIL C� � 1','7 L-0 J r _ , 67.r.IT .. —._ SEE DETAIL "E" j ,� � � ?� , . l � 1 �) 1 0 PART SCHEDULE � _. 71.82 0 �� - I _ PART CON LOT INST AREA MUNICIPALITY LLl 81-23 11 r)-0 Q w � _ a' . -- _ a�r_V : t I ) PART OF THE BED OF U Crs 1 � n e •--•11711 !,,-I �� er•131 1 -e � � ��� � LAKE ERIE LYING IN FRONT 1.733 0 C' t+. D_ "5 CO � _' IQ L� 1 OF LOTS 11 AND 12, CROWN Ha. Lti -.- o) m - � - 27 � � -I O rn , o � w a, r-7 --.--'-- _ 1 LLj I p CONCE:iSON 1 o ' PART {7F' fiNF PJt 0 Or O'.. � I z - .t" P1- - ( — - I s • LAKE ERIE LY NG IN FRONT 1 L OF LO 11 r,) _ i - - CONCESSION 1 �' . 0 � I& e W Y (a . __ ,, 7 � I , W ! 111N� rDIN S ,r yl j , - - L — 11.058 w y °�� c� 1 C 4 i�� r r sus 2 PART OF THE BED OF CROWN '14.� � ./ r L La ! �°, ! - i� _ {REGISTERED PLAt' r 7) - 11 r' Ha. `i y f �� �l 11 �� l �� r���� �'�� rr�Fr r OTTER CREEK LYING WITHIN C� i) / f C c. a -L C �*' 1 r - _ LOT 11, CONCESSION 1 �� 1 v 1 ', ' 0 �w 55='_.� �I ' - 1 - z 10.06 I PART OF GEOGRAPHIC _ 1 1 TD JNS 'iP F CP�� � _ - 1 Y w J IEI j 1-" 10.06 11 BAYHAM (P __ L-) , 0 -I 6 ~ ' �, 7 LLI `J I ' 3 0.232 7 u '" r in - I I w I PORT BURWELL) 379258 {VILLAGE OF -� FI as All w 6J 4 -O JL� ._:.90 N i _ o Li - - L„ I � 4 1 PART OF 378258 1.178 MUNICIPALITY C yG - h 88'S1nLO' 1�� �� r C-) Z,) wpm - 57�� J.. �, f, 11 Hq. OF (.17 w L7 L. ! uom rxM BAYHAM C) r ', I INST "r o I 72.38 c r � ��• I w O r _ �� a 364410 �Ln x z 1 �-' L�� 5 37925$ 0.346 I., b - y11 rJ7i74l r dj I-,, _ 3 f °) -- `'R -z C-1 � I 0 zL'i LL', 1 N � Ha.. c� - 57.14 �e I 7 d 3 a j 21.0 •_ I \1l y�t1 I I 0_ � - - PART OF THE BED OF LAKE 25.557 Q o ,�\ N p8' 52' 1C'" W - Y� �I Y�y N 88''45' 40" W L x 1 6 ERIE LYING IN FRONT OF �l ,.. _�, I 31 `" iP!-: & M1 _ * L wm - V) LOT LI .CONCESSION I Ha. °' co S _ s - s 1L1 - w PART OF THE BED OF LAKE CROWN X11" _ N n �'-; 00 �rE ^yam �- I J ERIE LYING IN FRONT OF 41.515 Lx� ;V` r s LCs 1 T J�� J 7 � r r'r: I. cn � o Ha. L_. Ln C N cy o � N '. "' ; yam `C, Jr�, r _� H I LOTS 11 AND 12 ,CONCESSION I �_ c -- n� c� `� V a r � �� � ~�� Ckf0 w PART 3 IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENT AS SET OUT IN UNREGISTERED DOCUMENT �; hi , . �' I _ r 53.75 r -i-• 30.18 ry I `` O Fz z L eyt . w Z `1 r� 's (F8 & M J P8 & M z I -1 z ~ o -? DATED: NOVEMBER 28, 1948 {FILE No. 407-,) ( ) RFejs v yr ]� L I- 4s - w o 1 cn �' ri I •I, a { �'J rr R� r7 5 z to I :IJ u } LLj c Y a oLF) -' hjJs6�j N�s$' 4�'ry4o 0. PI AN o (\ �RfD p � y w 0 PART 4 IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENT AS SET OUT IN UNREGISTERED DOCUMENT Eu _ �, Z 2.4E Q1.yw y I W CA i e U L DATED: MAY 34, 1939 (FILE No. 407-1U) ul)f1- I °-^,� w z- e} �' C-) , J,zi 4' w_ P �I I LLl I- F \� R 1�7 w o O LU z ) U L- cel W �, s _, z rJ PART 5 IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENT AS SET OUT IN UNREGISTERED DOCUMENT i?i s L < o C� 1C] F r Ili 'L 3 LA LLA F � �f f/ w N t I "� 1i DATED: APRIL 5, 1950 (FILE No. 407-1) �_; c" ``� 4 ' . 1L� tv 1,� (r1 rn L LLJ I E � ' \_ r z `- o l L,-1 N 84' S �0" ' 0 � n', -cn L _ ': _ �^ _ (n I f� � I (n J_ d L< -1 w z LL 18.6'; �, o (T) 1-f t...7 I U a �. I- Lel � yr __ _`1 4- `1 a cn I Q SEE ` tL C. I- '-. 1, V) O I � LLI a _-- T a �ErAIL 'G- -4'� ti _IL; 1 (n U cn _ 1 v r -;, zgo �r� PLAN OF SURVEY OF W �._- LL, j L� m h Ir 1 w Lt] 1. r -_ u' u 1 EC •LL� LIJ Q I w co } _. z j., '.-�,_ ` y \e ' T* i i i, Zo `L J J � L� D I rn L� F_ 1 U� z \✓ ` W 5 _ 0 1_� LL, _ PART OF THE BED OF LAKE ERIE =- ` e l 'L Q) �ST I 4y 1d" �' � n CL' n In n '--- -iLc 4 I-�, 2 Q P3 & s� BROCK �— � � �— m � r 1, � ; { 4811 � � �, ?J 10.06 LYING IN FRONT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 c P'd+ Z\, L.C\ _ � a' R LLQ A nl q r ,8 BROC`K eTRF- - � rr��r r i � CO � � � (t,8 ( � 6.? S8. Y J 10.06 ! L M 100.61 (M) 101.57 (P11 & M) , � c L,; ti —. 41 � �' ,� Y � � � � � �. � Q I , 3°., CONCESSION 1 Ln� Q C U, " N � 198 IV ,'t h 'g N 89. O 20" W I s N 15391" 64' 20'' W M r, Q F, `-\ r" N I- I 3 lY S,B (727' 1i.1 it I tr LL' L y t"..:.TAIL I L.. J 1 L.� ``i /� i��, LL - 1�, U z L) �.+- r3 U \ ) L a `SE 5\� ti`D ^ _� 1 ��� �,l I �\0`� 1 a% i ��f,GJ�7�R D PLAN N J� o u� GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF BAYHAM v - ri , o Ln ,=,� W - .�.. 4 _ ¢- i / I r �' '-' o a - I ! ^ in SIB (727) `'\ TH 0 CR E i<_, 1— PART OF E BED F OTTER E K N 88 }Ij 10 Ve ' ,0 0) - N 84' $ I". � 0 �y � 1 z F- # a w F'- o � • ' � (j) a v 4 �:: `�V 28. 6 4J d ` Ci x w o :` w V7 c -, a co w ? I (n I L 1 � +y I - S3 : i en ,,h_- 4 i 24 -, y r Ly N I w ,� o °'1: Q o N 6e n ° (P3 & '`) ts7 u lr._ _,� • I W o w a L__ n� <Y r '�c �3 % ©�� ° ( 18.49 L} `r r " z -In <e�— 1 - rc— � 1 — L1 I ' I_L- —- y LL1 I 2 1� `° LYING VIIITHIN LOT 11 CONCESSION 1 cD 1- 1 4� 7_ �' 'I r -i IN5T 10 r - N L'7 _ w' r`3 C, '11 �- \ei I dW 0 Z 4 "'' o r r CO cV `-' v_r v' (l7 r I (f1 Y I"'' _ a : LL 1nz a z - 18 i5 ��S,ln �, e till Q (n d F- '-' 1, Ir tss26 I INs g { 82 m 1e) N iE ,ri r - e• S I-- N -,� 0,. v _ <+. ,a.. a0 M I_ ) Q �s�- o AIL .. 1 � 'a -7 t�.u__ o Ln © I Q L� + (� �1 T _ GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP 0f' BAYHAM �o a E% H- LL , v �` O � a Cl - —� cV _ -0 • - -- S8 z L r, INSTRUMENTS q�, ^� - ---C ____ W 602.E "[4 ,1 '_O Ir,_rc ---+ _ .� - _J- '.. 'U - N M J \\ nn QQ i/ J75527 k PART OF LOT 11 �� �_) a Li / N 88' 59' 10" W L � 0.-- I.,� - I INST 4 I Y14� r ':s?ti L`'` W I '1 r - [f, O� '� ` 20.12 P11 & ASS O z 7 I'.f) J 11�ill 1 PAt2T 28, 11R-3740 j , m Ts' u.1 a 3r Z LJ 7 1 ` y{ ) I• ! s G f (!] i INSTRUMENT J1721i n o INS I Cy �,� x N �� 1' I w _ 11 _ 1 S� y1b PLAN }iFi�288 �8 N a? c1+ 464 36.E rj- 4 \ 88. 34' 50" W ; _ iti r� r I_ ` - -- t y 1 _ C "Oe L.1 vs 20.12 (P10 k S, �, - r- �2 g '� f} T s8 ,�, j � O U < _ Br > �7J t' �, -� _ 45.26 Q 24.5 �-L- -- U�Lb µBT 19340" f�o� 61 00 �B� r CONCESSION 1 J = �, N I L J cv ys r " f N- of 7- o f m J _ �°.L' �i. �ti_. d ¢ r s 5 N 88' 59-1 i0" W J a'. .36 c ' ry �/ ,i' w 1,.75 B (fir >#� <� -, in '_fi5 (Pll & M) C 101.58' S9' ,0" W m/,f-4 -- 21t_82 g56 Cvh� �= L. co - 0 4 �L .._ , r 40.90 - _ (P„ & M) _ _ 'x'4 4• ¢ -; 5 . GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF BA YHAM 1 v -4 Ltl S r 1 - 29.08 13.021 17.65 18.1 10^ t8 m [€ BA . ) / � Li 0. �' 0. t 4 N - o C' wh � w� JJ�L r��1�,9AI�i {RP. m w (RP.°P ��11-8 -r d`'.1 (VILLAGE OF PORT BURWELL 11) _ 7_011 1 TF3 r; f ) �! ,2) 1 PART 1 � UN, S �,/ C /� ry Lt, r N' II �. �' 3.80 '�-� U �' n 1 N 1 12 --N 1--r' 1 n a N �1 N ' 1 Ari L TRA ONLY - !Y! UNrI V IPf-I al I / OF t:-., 85 Or. - e I I , , >� I n -I L1.. 2,.:o v 0 Z m fad', fi " � i) 1 rS 24 71 Ln � ,1.;: I�0 -,m z 1 � ,� � - BAYHAM r'i, Y a c-. ,A N`� N F' 1 S U1�Eol 1 I 17 I fD edI N� � DECEMBER 16, � � �t r d` � z rN m EDGE AS AT fL cs c_ d m r 1 w r ,,,.�----� _ X02 �, - b 1 1 WATER'S COUNTY OF ELGIN z - ti o. z� 7+ /' z a ,,., c l I I O (�� I 0 50 100 METRES 150 _ _1, J 0.10 Y w _, 1 � SEE N I SCALE 1:2000 `4 "Z i1 �I LL1Q (JET/ N) 1� + 19g1 I METRIC' DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND $4 L `���- 1 � rp 4� �. � � � �r . I � �(„ c 364¢,0 � CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048 g' `._--o c a fig, �J n l p P ,P1 `I 1' �GF012f 1Sd SRUMEi�T vi a E I' Sf .=."° �. `01 /"' r� �- r SGL �1 U S P� 0 o i - 1 EL �� t, , �' ;d moo_ N 85' 0 5900 E `� Y + �DG� PJ a 1P tea. T, i= _ ... - ,.gl,' I KIM HUSTED SURVEYING LTD. V im: , I,. a I 17.5 , G I y w� I w I U I - 120 i4 (: & '1)3 �0 y I IC O `v t� o a r n 1a 8s;' 41' 50" W "Do`y e o, " I � a - � a ,.\,a l� v , Y W I o r, F: 9' ,,'' 50" W (S) z � 0 4 0 / JE iA1L � 7.6;0 (P1 & M) cz c, aT c c:, r, '6Ak� TO SET SOUTHWEST v ! } h Lo �, �;\i CORNER OF PORT BURWELL N ` r; a�M ' /HARBOUR FROM THE NORTHWEST l �c r2in. U`- �, " \NS NER OF LOT 11, CONCESSION 1 n I .� , " r I x'- 6 " 11 r0 0 TOWNSHIP OF BAYHAM U_ I n rI a �► „ w DETAIL B �; 1 1- �-..s- ;-S ; .�11� tib-�,� Jan �� � � �4 � ' � 3 / MOTTO SCALE � l} - Ir'\ISIH','MENT 366001 2. '�L7�1 � �' 'IJ -4/ Z � rn `0 M NOT TO SCALE 01 y 1 L�JvC 's ,1�1 F " a I U1 4 t � � ��� up w - I 11 � �. ,A,jl -Q f _V r � m . 1 --Ll "I ) w 1 A }� �C 41 1, siB N 59' 41 40" W z o -/ CI�� -tiJV ' L I Li L0 ^� II Q Y Y sa 4 c I„ ] , �sarn 8 C) I', �NoR�1 - a- o L� CI' W ca Q7 1_ (, .: ('r' 11.).r:. P4) J �--- 215.53-, 0.41 L) tl LDT QST d I l 1- r, r r, C COR 4 ft- Li f L Q w =t ` r - - -- (P1 u �) w I") �, a,vcc,%ON afi cn vzi U _i; Ly 41 4 r r� `ae4� _;: R yak ') w o Q ' cc o i o N 58 (P 3& ) S r3 - . \e � -16 k l? 4 x \ N z i CJ Ln cD I- 11-1 14 � 7 0 4' 10" E ,,.,,-,8 1. cu 6.4e Ly, w I �' ±L U r rn _ � -c w/ --C 1 N $2' W o. [L. -z �i \� e , 1 >_ U) Z I E 2.05 7 , F J .. o, ,`6m Z ZL, `'vo, 1 1.33 .;:� 3.54 1 z 4 C a `� o m � I ED _ S�8 (w, s 4 _ r }1 _r ��- -- -- 1,) Z) U r- w o Lel � 7i td7 L ;I w ^_L � DETAIL ,►A„ _ 01. - z: a_ - LL) N I o 0 �. N 87' 04' OC" E � � o o Z Ln "; \/ C; `-' x" do M _ �14 NOT TO S'GALE 1 ¢ O 0O w 0 � cA Q cc _ 6..10 (�_ C+7 ' ,m 3 }_ � J F - z � Ll -. t!) :/1 oy '"1 TRi,i+TENT ,46902 m s II- � i m 0 c¢v 1jl -1 y r } '• 0 to ; " Ln l _ (D- �) z /I w I r� I "� 1 V) 01 Z i EL c.I co 0 1a_ T II Q C _ n w r r` l +- = oLo `o 1- 7c� C?. L,. Cl., rn L� r I Q h PAR J o w- -. c- .� _ _ , i J 0 v \f `0Ci L) o I LLI Q („� �o z L_ c Q LJ - �G �T' 'C=.1 c ',.�_ '�i' , ' r I ¢ Ln u } .V 1 O Op` . 4 r�- s9 16$01 I , -., t -�� L ' J� ) / f/ \ i,) O _ L L� o Cj . r U q P�P' U)Ln w 4" L h {P U. , �`�-\�=/<,, __ � /1 z (' O I �,S �(.S ! PART ] � F- c,j 9--.6 ,� N �- [--- 49�J r 11 -L I cc 1 oOl A r, f/JS 1.s f,. 74' 72 I rP% } Q� C 4 Q 2 1 4\ 1„ '_ U"F JS' 4,q— N)-77 11 � ��`'v L) I SURVEYOR'S �,ERTIFICATE ' I F. A ra -) 13q w �*` ,_~, , ! 40' 32' 50" E m o CERTIFY THAT :S1 1111111, . - I `6®bZ �o�� �i� ? 41 i- , \� e' ¢ U (1) - THIS SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH o `fir 'I �, D F -IFI o f ¢ o THE SURVEYS ACT, THE SURVEYORS ACT AND THE REGISTRY ACT AND THE 5 ��� � LOo 1­1�_ p /r f ¢ x REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THEM OL I N! L.L �� ' ON L Ai� .. - Ix r I R a P� r 1 JJ� Q 5 -RE � of LL �� £ \c. \ a / m L,� I w (2) - THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE 17th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. - L� C0� a, , x G1 /�� Cp, J T 0 M V' P O 1 U1 00 F- ep o, L_ C; �' ti� f- CID. � Nl }, oIrl ; <1 -- _ cc! Elf Z, _ t � N_s ? .L ) r tp - - `r; 41 H O \ ox- \ J 0 VN s 6R 1 C) LLQ LL_ 0 02 rsy 4" L� 3 Lf1 / LL (M) /` Al 169.79 (M) IB. (WIT) ` 75.95 (M) 20.95(M) / CS 72.89(M) (1582) y1 REO C INSTRUMENT 13348f rr JrPART 1 5 SEA .NW, rrrr 20.12m WIDE ) ,)192`�$c t) (CLOSED C AND 504 - f PA SED IONOF BAYHAM THE 2nd DAY—LAWS 503 OF DECEMBER, 1895) N 89' 30' 50' W (S) 89.28 (P1 & M) 10f N 89' 30' 50' W 103.18 (P1 & M) 58.57 (P1 & M) 30.71(P1 & M)21.04(M) 82.14 (M) \ SS18 (WIT) IB (1582) Al (1582) `ft �lzl - � � LL, LJ r 5 L0 r ;� /10 �� 4cy w 04 C Q2 W LSI— �/S LTJ,? t� ¢ w N `v W LO f 24 Lo P9 0 tn J LJ r2>m �,� L J r 2, 0 I J -r 23 O �7 f} u < Q \% 01 — 0 O J J LOr 21 LJ -f 2-1 Lr LLQ LLQ LI 0, L VV/\rrR L 0D = IRE" -11-' r 0 ( 20.12m WIDE REGISTERED PLAN 12) "� N 89' 30' 50' W (REFERENCE BEARING) LOT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 25, EAST OF ROBINSON STREET, REGISTERED PLAN NO. 12 LOT 4 LOT 6 J7 23 2 �W 100.63 (P1 & M) LOT LOT LOT L 0 T 2 241 23 22 X11 PLAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF THE BED OF THE BIG OTTER CREEK, (PORT BURWELL HARBOUR) LYING WITHIN LOT 11, CONCESSION 1 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF BAYHA M MUNICIPALITY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BAYHAM COUNTY OF ELGIN 0 15 METERS 30 SCALE - 1:600 DISTANCES SHWN ON TIS PLAN METRIC BE CONVERT DO 0 FEETHBY DIVIDI ARE 0.3048IC UNITS AND CAN KIM RUSTED SURVEYING LTD. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT (1) — TH1 S SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURVEYS ACT, THE SURVEYORS ACT AND THE REGISTRY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THEM (2) — THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE 11th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001 JANUARY 30, 2001 DATE KIM *STED 0 TARIO LAND SURVEYOR NOTES (1) - BEARINGS ARE ASTRONOMIC AND ARE REFERRED TO THE THE SOUTHERN LIMIT OF WATERLOO STREET AS SHOWN ON DEPOSITED PLAN 11R-6760 HAVING A BEARING OF N 89' 30' 50" W (2) — THE LIMITS OF THE BIG OTTER CREEK AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY SURVEY COMPLETED ON THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2001 AND BY IDENTIFYING THE WATERS EDGE AS BEING THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THESE LIMITS. Z LEGEND LLL, LL7 ■ DENOTES SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND ❑ DENOTES SURVEY MONUMENT SET SIB DENOTES STANDARD IRON BAR IB DENOTES IRON BAR RIB DENOTES ROUND IRON BAR (WIT.) DENOTES WITNESS CON, DENOTES CONCESSION INST. DENOTES INSTRUMENT (M) DENOTES MEASURED (S) DENOTES SET (P1) DENOTES DEPOSITED PLAN 11R-6760 (P2) DENOTES DEPOSITED PLAN 11R-6474 CIS L�h��L �i 40 N z a 0 w cn C7 w a LI 0, L VV/\rrR L 0D = IRE" -11-' r 0 ( 20.12m WIDE REGISTERED PLAN 12) "� N 89' 30' 50' W (REFERENCE BEARING) LOT NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 25, EAST OF ROBINSON STREET, REGISTERED PLAN NO. 12 LOT 4 LOT 6 J7 23 2 �W 100.63 (P1 & M) LOT LOT LOT L 0 T 2 241 23 22 X11 PLAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF THE BED OF THE BIG OTTER CREEK, (PORT BURWELL HARBOUR) LYING WITHIN LOT 11, CONCESSION 1 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF BAYHA M MUNICIPALITY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BAYHAM COUNTY OF ELGIN 0 15 METERS 30 SCALE - 1:600 DISTANCES SHWN ON TIS PLAN METRIC BE CONVERT DO 0 FEETHBY DIVIDI ARE 0.3048IC UNITS AND CAN KIM RUSTED SURVEYING LTD. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT (1) — TH1 S SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURVEYS ACT, THE SURVEYORS ACT AND THE REGISTRY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THEM (2) — THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE 11th DAY OF JANUARY, 2001 JANUARY 30, 2001 DATE KIM *STED 0 TARIO LAND SURVEYOR NOTES (1) - BEARINGS ARE ASTRONOMIC AND ARE REFERRED TO THE THE SOUTHERN LIMIT OF WATERLOO STREET AS SHOWN ON DEPOSITED PLAN 11R-6760 HAVING A BEARING OF N 89' 30' 50" W (2) — THE LIMITS OF THE BIG OTTER CREEK AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY SURVEY COMPLETED ON THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2001 AND BY IDENTIFYING THE WATERS EDGE AS BEING THE BEST AVAILABLE EVIDENCE OF THESE LIMITS. Z LEGEND LLL, LL7 ■ DENOTES SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND ❑ DENOTES SURVEY MONUMENT SET SIB DENOTES STANDARD IRON BAR IB DENOTES IRON BAR RIB DENOTES ROUND IRON BAR (WIT.) DENOTES WITNESS CON, DENOTES CONCESSION INST. DENOTES INSTRUMENT (M) DENOTES MEASURED (S) DENOTES SET (P1) DENOTES DEPOSITED PLAN 11R-6760 (P2) DENOTES DEPOSITED PLAN 11R-6474 Property Number 54022 < Directory of Federal Real Property < Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat ' ' Treasury Board of Canada Seoretariat du Conseil du Tr$sor Se creitariat du Canada Home > OCG > RPM > DFRP Property Number 54022 Property Number: 54022 Custodian: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact: Dianne Green - 613.993.1832 Interest: Crown Owned Restriction: No Restriction Primary Use: Transportation Marine Address: Chatham St., Lake Erie; Part Lot 11, Concession 1 Place Name: Port Burwell Municipality: Bayham Province/Territory: Ontario Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Land Area: 84.0640 ha Record Created: 1991.05.06 Portfolio Certified: 2011.12.20 Buildings: 0 Locate This Property on Map Latitude/ Longitude: 42.639855, -80.805650 Accurate within f 200m Floor Area: 0 sq. M. Page 1 of 1 an d'a" Date Modified: 2005-11-27 Important Notices Top of Page Property Number 54022 < Directory of Federal Real Property < Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat ' ' Treasury Board of Canada Seoretariat du Conseil du Tr$sor Secretariat du Canada Home > OCG > RPM > DFRP > PN 54022 > Secondary Interests Property Number 54022 Property 85246 Port Burwell (Automation Building) Organization: Fisheries and Oceans Canada (Other) Use(s): Transportation Marine Interest: Secondary Interest Address: Front Lot 11, Con. I, Twp of Houghton Municipality: Bayham, ON Land Area (ha) 0 Buildings: 1 Floor Area (sq. M.): 30 Page 1 of 1 an d'a" Date Modified: 2005-11-27 Important Notices Top of Page Port Burwell (Automation Building) < Directory of Federal Real Property < Treasury Board of Canada Sec... Page 1 of 1 ' ' Treasurys Board Gf Canada Secretariat du Cornsoil du Trascr Secretariat du Canada Home > OCG > RPM > DFRP > Query #9337920 Port Burwell (Automation Building) Property Number: Custodian: Official Contact: Interest: Primary Property Number: 85246 Fisheries and Oceans Canada Mandy Irving - 613.993.3155 Secondary Interest 54022 Restriction: No Restriction Primary Use: Transportation Marine Address: Front Lot 11, Con. I, Twp of Houghton Place Name: Township of Houghton Municipality: Bayham Province/Territory: Ontario Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Land Area: 0 ha Bui.g ldins: 1 Floor Area: 30 sq. m. ......... ............. Locate This Property on Map Latitude/ Longitude: 42.641940, -80.808330 Accurate within f loom Record Created: 2006.10.06 Portfolio Certified: 2012.01.26 an d'a" Date Modified: 2010-01-26 Important Notices Top of Page Port Burwell Automation Building < Directory of Federal Real Property < Treasury Board of Canada Secre... Page 1 of 1 ' ' TrGasuryr Board of Canada Secretariat du CorrsGil du Trdsor Secretariat day Canada Home > OCG > RPM > DFRP > PN 85246 Port Burwell Automation Building Building Number: 085246 Custodian: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Property Number: 85246 Port Burwell (Automation Building) Official Contact: Mandy Irving - 613.993.3155 Interest: Crown Owned Condition: Fair Construction Year: 1972 Floor Area: 30 sq. m. Occupancy: Fully Occupied Use(s): Warehouse, Storage and Workshops Address: Front Lot 11, Con. I, Twp of Houghton Municipality: Bayham Province/Territory: Ontario Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Locate This Building on Map Latitude/ Longitude: 42.641940, -80.808330 Record Created: 2009.01.28 Portfolio Certified: 2012.01.26 an d'a" Date Modified: 2011-02-09 Important Notices Top of Page Contaminated Site 00013964 ,�F ' Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat du Conseil du Trssor Secretariat du Canada Home > FCSI > Site 00013964 Contaminated Site 00013964 Status: Historical review completed. No further action required. Site Status: Closed Departmental Identifier C F 00271 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Theophile Pare - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number 85247) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, longitude 42.63242, -80.80909 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Additional Information Unassessed Population Radius Population 1 km 133 5 km 3,121 10 km 9,861 25 km 48,748 50 km 260,861 Financial/Annual Information 2011-2012 Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C F 00271 Classification no data CCME Flag NO NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Planned Completion Date (Step 7) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 8) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 9) no data Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed Yes Page 1 of 2 Contaminated Site 00013964 2007-07-24 Date Modified: 2009-06-26 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 Site 00012785 - Sediment - E of Talismen ASTs - Metals, Pesticide 14M Traasuiy Board of Canada Secretariat du Conseil du Tresor Secretariat du Canada Home > FCSI > Site 00012785 Site 00012785 - Sediment - E of Talismen ASTs - Metals, Pesticide Status: Historical review completed. Initial testing underway. Site Status: Departmental Identifier C S 04766 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Theophile Pare - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number ) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, Longitude 42.639856, -80.80565 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Site Management Strategy • Remediation Contaminant Details An estimated amount of contaminated medium has not been reported for this site. The following contaminated media exist on the site: Contaminant Type Medium Type PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) Sediment PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Sediment Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) and PCDD/Fs (polychlorinated dibenzo Sediment -p-dioxin/dibenzofuran) Other organics Sediment Population Radius Population 1 km 131 5 km 3,080 10 km 9,604 25 km 49,690 50 km 274,506 Financial/Annual Information Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C S 04766 Classification no data CCME Flag No NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Page 1 of 2 9 j 1.1 _r [. i 1".I( C4. Site 00012785 - Sediment - E of Talismen ASTs - Metals, Pesticide Planned Completion Date (Step 7) n0 data Planned Completion Date (Step 8) n0 data Planned Completion Date (Step 9) no data Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed No 2006-03-30 Date Modified: 2009-04-20 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 Site 00012786 - Sed. -26 in W of Concrete Pier (N Corner) -Pesticide Trsasury Board of Canada Secr6tariat du Conseil du Tr$sor Secretariat du Canada Home > FCSI > Site 00012786 Site 00012786 - Sed. -26 m W of Concrete Pier (N Corner) - Pesticide Status: Historical review completed. Initial testing underway. Site Status: Departmental Identifier C S 04766 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Theophile Pare - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number ) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, Longitude 42.639856, -80.80565 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Site Management Strategy • Other Contaminant Details An estimated amount of contaminated medium has not been reported for this site. The following contaminated media exist on the site: Contaminant Type Medium Type PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) Sediment PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Sediment Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment Pesticides Sediment Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Sediment Population Radius Population 1 km 131 5 km 3,080 10 km- 9,604 25 km- 49,690 50 km - 274,506 Financial/Annual Information Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C S 04766 Classification no data CCME Flag NO NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Planned Completion Date (Step 7) no data Page 1 of 2 cana(h.I Site 00012786 - Sed. -26 in W of Concrete Pier (N Corner) -Pesticide Planned Completion Date (Step 8) n0 data Planned Completion Date (Step 9) n0 data Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed No 2006-03-30 Date Modified: 2009-04-20 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 Site 00016589 - Sediment - 12 in W of Concrete Pier (North Corner) Trsasuiy Board of Canada Secr6tariat du Conseil du Trdsor Secretariat du Canada Page 1 of 2 Home > FCSI > Site 00016589 Site 00016589 - Sediment - 12 m W of Concrete Pier (North Corner) Status: Historical review completed. Initial testing underway. Site Status: Departmental Identifier C S 04766 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Theophile Pare - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number ) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, Longitude 42.639856, -80.80565 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Site Management Strategy • Remediation Contaminant Details An estimated amount of contaminated medium has not been reported for this site. The following contaminated media exist on the site: Contaminant Type Medium Type PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) Sediment PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Sediment Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Sediment Population Radius Population 1 km 131 5 km 3,080 10 km 9,604 25 km 49,690 50 km 274,506 Financial/Annual Information Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C S 04766 Classification no data CCME Flag NO NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Planned Completion Date (Step 7) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 8) no data Site 00016589 - Sediment - 12 in W of Concrete Pier (North Corner) Planned Completion Date (Step 9) n0 data Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed No 2007-07-24 Date Modified: 2009-04-20 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 Site 00016590 - Surface Soil - East Beach Property j Tr�aa ;uiy Board of Canada SGcr6tariat du Conseil du Tr4 ;or ! Secretariat du Canada Home > FCSI > Site 00016590 Site 00016590 - Surface Soil - East Beach Property Status: Historical review completed. Initial testing underway. Site Status: Departmental Identifier C S 04766 Reporting Organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Th6ophile Parti - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number 54022) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, Longitude 42.639856, -80.80565 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Site Management Strategy • Remediation Contaminant Details An estimated amount of contaminated medium has not been reported for this site. The following contaminated media exist on the site: Contaminant Type Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Population Radius Population 1 km 131 5 km 3,080 10 km 9,604 25 km 49,690 50 km 274,506 Financial/Annual Information Medium Type Soil Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting Organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C S 04766 Classification no data CCME Flag No NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Planned Completion Date (Step 7) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 8) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 9) no data Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Page 1 of 2 9 1.1 ; I I I " I ci Site 00016590 - Surface Soil - East Beach Property FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed No 2007-07-24 Date Modified: 2009-04-20 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 Site 00016591 - Sediment - Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant Taxa ;uiy Board of Canada SGcr6tariat du Conseil du Tre ;or I I Secretarbt du Canada Home > FCSI > Site 00016591 Page 1 of 2 Site 00016591 - Sediment - Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant Status: Historical review completed. Initial testing underway. Site Status: Departmental Identifier C S 04766 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Theophile Pare - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number 54022) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, Longitude 42.639856, -80.80565 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Site Management Strategy • Remediation Contaminant Details An estimated amount of contaminated medium has not been reported for this site. The following contaminated media exist on the site: Contaminant Type Medium Type PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) Sediment PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Sediment Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) and PCDD/Fs (polychlorinated dibenzo Sediment -p-dioxin/dibenzofuran) Population Radius Population 1 km 131 5 km 3,080 10 km 9,604 25 km 49,690 50 km 274,506 Financial/Annual Information Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C S 04766 Classification no data CCME Flag NO NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Planned Completion Date (Step 7) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 8) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 9) no data Site 00016591 - Sediment - Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed No 2007-07-24 Date Modified: 2009-04-20 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 Site 00016592 - Sediment - West of Concrete & East Steel Dock (SW) -I ITreasury Board of Canada Secr6tariat du Conseil du Tresor Secretariat du Canada Page 1 of 2 ti y _: ;111"I(, ci Home > FCSI > Site 00016592 Site 00016592 - Sediment - West of Concrete & East Steel Dock (SW) Status: Historical review completed. Initial testing underway. Site Status: Departmental Identifier C S 04766 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Theophile Pare - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number ) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, Longitude 42.639856, -80.80565 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Site Management Strategy • Remediation Contaminant Details An estimated amount of contaminated medium has not been reported for this site. The following contaminated media exist on the site: Contaminant Type Medium Type Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Sediment Population Radius Population 1 km 131 5 km 3,080 10 km 9,604 25 km 49,690 50 km 274,506 Financial/Annual Information Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C S 04766 Classification no data CCME Flag No NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Planned Completion Date (Step 7) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 8) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 9) no data Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Site 00016592 - Sediment - West of Concrete & East Steel Dock (SW) Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed No 2007-07-24 Date Modified: 2009-04-20 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 Site 00016593 - Sediment - North of East Steel Dock j Trsa ;uiy Board of Canada Secr6tariat du Conseil du Tr$sor ! Secretariat du Canada Home > FCSI > Site 00016593 Site 00016593 - Sediment - North of East Steel Dock Status: Historical review completed. Initial testing underway. Site Status: Departmental Identifier C S 04766 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Official Contact Theophile Pare - 613.949.8664 Reason for Involvement Federal Real Property Property Type Federal (DFRP Property Number 54022) Site Location Locate this site on map Latitude, Longitude 42.639856, -80.80565 Municipality Bayham, ON Federal Electoral District Elgin--Middlesex--London Site Management Strategy • Remediation Contaminant Details An estimated amount of contaminated medium has not been reported for this site. The following contaminated media exist on the site: Contaminant Type Medium Type Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Sediment Population Radius Population 1 km 131 5 km 3,080 10 km 9,604 25 km 49,690 50 km 274,506 Financial/Annual Information Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Reporting organization Fisheries and Oceans Canada Internal Identifier C S 04766 Classification no data CCME Flag NO NCSCS Year no data Highest Step Completed 02 Historical Review Planned Completion Date (Step 7) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 8) no data Planned Completion Date (Step 9) no data Total Assessment Expenditure $0.00 Total Remediation Expenditure $0.00 Total Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 Page 1 of 2 Canada I Site 00016593 - Sediment - North of East Steel Dock Total Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Assessment Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Remediation Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Care Maintenance Expenditure $0.00 FCSAP Monitoring Expenditure $0.00 Actual Cubic Meters Remediated 0 m3 Actual Hectares Remediated 0 ha Actual Tons Remediated 0 t Closed No 2007-07-24 Date Modified: 2009-04-20 Portfolio Certified 2012-06-29 Page 2 of 2 of 11 r6760.dgn Model 2012/09/24 2:30:11 location map °�sr,erbr LEGEND DENOTES PROPERTY BOUNDARY NOTES carte de location NOT TO SCALE THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. DRAWING IS A GRAPHIC REPRESTENTATION ONLY, AND IS SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY SURVEY. SHOULD THERE BE A CONFLICT WITH PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED DOCUMENTATION OR SURVEY RECORDS, THE REGISTERED DOCUMENTATION OR SURVEY RECORDS SHALL GOVERN LINEWORK IS BASED ON SCANNED PLANS AND MANUAL INPUT OF BEARINGS AND DISTANCES AS SHOWN ON HISTORIC DESCRIPTIONS AND PLANS. THE POSITION OF THE WATERS EDGE RELATIVE TO THE SUBJECT LANDS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING IS AN APPROXIMATION ONLY AND REQUIRES FIELD SURVEY FOR VERIFICATION. AIR PHOTO WAS OBTAINED FROM TERRAPEX ENVIROMENTAL LTD SOURCE OF AIR PHOTO — VUMAP FIRST BASE SOLUTIONS 2010 IMAGERY. BOUNDARY LINEWORK AND AIR PHOTO ARE NOT GEO—REFERENCED BUT ARE VISUALLY OVERLAYED TO EACH OTHER. REVISIONS No. I By I Dote lApproved I Revisions DRAFT project title titre du project PORT BURWELL SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR drawing title litre du design PROPOSED SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA scole echelle 25m Om 50m 100m checked by. A. TIEMAN O.L.S. verifie par consultant consultant project dote D.F.R.P. No, drown by RW PWGSC/TPSGC SEPTEMBER 2012 S.G.C. C.G.T. I Item no. sheet feuille project no. 1 of de 1 Canada ' ' Publ+c Works and Trovoux publics et Government Services Gonodo Services gouvernement aux Canodo R..1 Prggwly S-Aco R.1w F+apIXlr ciiRpnw'x. 5"r — Dk.t--des —1k..immobili— Sw*_ g—tiques immobiliers location map °�sr,erbr LEGEND DENOTES PROPERTY BOUNDARY NOTES carte de location NOT TO SCALE THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY. DRAWING IS A GRAPHIC REPRESTENTATION ONLY, AND IS SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY SURVEY. SHOULD THERE BE A CONFLICT WITH PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED DOCUMENTATION OR SURVEY RECORDS, THE REGISTERED DOCUMENTATION OR SURVEY RECORDS SHALL GOVERN LINEWORK IS BASED ON SCANNED PLANS AND MANUAL INPUT OF BEARINGS AND DISTANCES AS SHOWN ON HISTORIC DESCRIPTIONS AND PLANS. THE POSITION OF THE WATERS EDGE RELATIVE TO THE SUBJECT LANDS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING IS AN APPROXIMATION ONLY AND REQUIRES FIELD SURVEY FOR VERIFICATION. AIR PHOTO WAS OBTAINED FROM TERRAPEX ENVIROMENTAL LTD SOURCE OF AIR PHOTO — VUMAP FIRST BASE SOLUTIONS 2010 IMAGERY. BOUNDARY LINEWORK AND AIR PHOTO ARE NOT GEO—REFERENCED BUT ARE VISUALLY OVERLAYED TO EACH OTHER. REVISIONS No. I By I Dote lApproved I Revisions DRAFT project title titre du project PORT BURWELL SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR drawing title litre du design PROPOSED SAMPLING LOCATION PROJECT AREA scole echelle 25m Om 50m 100m checked by. A. TIEMAN O.L.S. verifie par consultant consultant project dote D.F.R.P. No, drown by RW PWGSC/TPSGC SEPTEMBER 2012 S.G.C. C.G.T. I Item no. sheet feuille project no. 1 of de 1 APPENDIX II SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTO 1: VIEW OF AREA NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, LOOKING SOUTH. BRADFIELDS MARINA IS LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES OF BIG OTTER CREEK. NOTE THE WHITE AST FUEL TANK ON THE RIGHT OF THE MOORED BOAT. THE WHITE TRUCK TRAILER IN THE BACKGROUND IS LOCATED IN THE FORMER LOCATION OF THE CPR LOCOMOTIVE ROUNDHOUSE TURNTABLE STRUCTURE IN APEC 3. PHOTO 2: VIEW OF THE UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND APEC 1, LOOKING NORTH. NOTE THE SHRUBS, TREES ALONG THE EAST BANK OF THE CREEK. JUST BEYOND TREES, THE FORMER CPR LOCOMOTIVE ROUNDHOUSE TURNTABLE STRUCTURE WAS LOCATED ON APEC 3. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..1 PHU I U:3: VIEW OF 1 HE WE51 ERN LAND PUR I IUN AND I URNING BA61N INI-ILL, LUUKING NUR I HWE51. PHOTO 4: VIEW LOOKING NORTH AT THE WESTERN LAND PARCEL AND TURNING BASIN INFILL. PROPOSED LOCATION OF MW103 TO ADDRESS APEC 1. NOTE THE INDENTATION IN THE GRASS. THIS INDENTATION IS THE CONCRETE RETAINING WALL OF THE TURNING BASIN PRIOR TO BEING INFILLED. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. C13664.00 ..2 PHOTO 5: VIEW OF THE EAST HARBOUR CONCRETE AND STEEL WALL LOOKING EAST. THIS SHOWS THE VACANT LAND OF APEC 3 WHERE HISTORICAL RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE TRANSPORTED COMMODITIES INCLUDING COAL. PITT STREET IS SHOWN TO THE LEFT OF THE LIGHTHOUSE RESTAURANT IN THE BACKGROUND. PHOTO 6: VIEW LOOKING NORTH AT BIG OTTER CREEK. THE TURNING BASIN INFILL IS ON THE LEFT AND THE BARGE IS DOCKED TO THE NORTH END OF THE EAST CONCRETE PIER ON THE RIGHT. PROPOSED BH SED1 TO ADDRESS APEC 1 IS LOCATED IN THE CENTRE OF THE RIVER NEAR THE BARGE. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..3 PHOTO 7: VIEW OF THE LAND ON THE WEST HARBOUR WALL PARCEL - SOUTH END, LOOKING NORTH. THIS SHOWS THE PROPOSED BH LOCATION OF MW102 TO ADDRESS APEC 1 NEAR THE DRY-DOCKED BOATS ON THE PORT BURWELL HARBOUR FACILITY PROPERTY. PHOTO 8: VIEW OF THE EAST CONCRETE PIER, LOOKING NORTHEAST. THIS SHOWS THE PROPOSED BH LOCATION OF SED2 TO ADDRESS APEC 1. PWGSC Project No. R.0059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..4 PHOTO 9: PHOTO OF THE LOCATION OF TWO ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS (ASTs) ON THE PORT BURWELL HARBOUR FACILITY PROPERTY. LOOKING EAST. PHOTO 10: VIEW OF THE PORT BURWELL HARBOUR FACILITY PROPERTY, LOOKING NORTHWEST. NOTE THE DRY-DOCKED BOATS, THE DREDGING ACTIVITIES AND THE STOCKPILING OF DREDGED MATERIALS ON THE PROPERTY. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..5 -M AMM PHOTO 11: PHOTO OF THE LOCATION OF TWO ASTs AND THE STOCKPILED OF DREDGED MATERIALS ON THE PORT BURWELL HARBOUR FACILITY. NORTHEAST. THE DREDGING ACTIVIES WERE IN PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY OF A SUBMARINE. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..6 PHOTO 13: PHOTO OF MOUTH OF BIG OTTER CREEK DRAINING INTO LAKE ERIE PAST THE LIGHTHOUSE ON THE END OF THE EAST CONCRETE PIER, LOOKING SOUTH. O PHOTO 14: VIEW OF THE SOUTHERN END OF THE WEST PIERAND THE LAND PARCEL BETWEEN THE WEST PIER AND HARBOUR, LOOKING SOUTHWEST. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..7 PHOTO 15: VIEW OF THE SOUTHERN END OF THE WEST HARBOUR WALL WITH THE SEWER OUTFALL FROM THE SEWAGE PLANT ON CHATHAM STREET VISIBLE BESIDE THE WOODEN PILES, LOOKING SOUTHWEST. PHOTO 16: VIEW OF WOODEN BOARDWALK EXTENDING SOUTH TO THE WEST PIER PARCEL, LOOKING SOUTH. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..8 � 9 - � � .201 PHOTO 17: PHOTO OF WOODEN BOARDWALK ON THE WEST PIER AND THE SUBJECT SITE IN THE BACKGROUND. PHOTO 18. VIEW OF THE WESTARMOUR BREAKWALL LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERN TIP OF THE WEST PIER, LOOKING SOUTHWEST. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..9 06.12.2012 14'01 1 PHOTO 19: PHOTO OF THE SOLAR -POWERED LIGHTHOUSE ON THE SOUTHERN END OF THE WEST ARMOUR BREAKWALL. LOOKING EAST. PHOTO 20: VIEW OF EAST BEACH PARCEL (PART 1 ON PLAN 11R-7468), LOOKING EAST. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.0081.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..10 V� 4.0 1. J PHOTO 21: PHOTO OF ABANDONED BARGED RESTING ON INFILLED TURNING BASIN ON THE WEST SIDE OF BIG OTTER CREEK, LOOKING SOUTHEAST PHOTO 22: VIEW OF FORMER COAST GUARD AUTOMATION BUILDING ON WEST PIER PARCEL, LOOKING NORTHWEST. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..11 PHOTO 23: VIEW OF SEWAGE PLANT ON ADJACENT PROPERTY NORTHWEST OF AUTOMATION BUILDING, LOOKING SOUTHWEST. THIS PLANT IS INCLUDED IN APEC 2. PHOTO 24: VIEW OF WHITE MONITORING WELL EAST OF SEWAGE PLANT ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WEST OF WEST HARBOUR WALL, LOOKING WEST. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..12 3eq- `uf 1111,1����_a.�1t�i7Rn�la' PHOTO 25: VIEW OF FRAGMENTS OF COAL OBSERVED ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY NORTHEAST OF AUTOMATION BUILDING ON APEC 2, LOOKING SOUTHWEST. 9F M1 _ � ln.. #; ti a Fge "i i ]w millii TTa mo �2 06 °1. 120, PHOTO 26: CLOSE-UP VIEW OF THE FRAGMENTS OF COAL OBSERVED ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY WEST OF THE WEST HARBOUR WALL ON APEC 2, LOOKING SOUTHWEST. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..13 PHOTO 27: VIEW OF DRILLING BOREHOLE MW101 TO ADDRESS APEC 1, SOUTHEAST OF THE AUTOMATION BUILDING, LOOKING NORTHEAST. PHOTO 28: VIEW OF COMPLETED BOREHOLE MW101, LOOKING NORTH ATAUTOMATION BUILDING IN BACKGROUND. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..14 hod PHOTO 29: VIEW OF DRILLING BOREHOLE MW102 TO ADDRESS APEC 1 ON LAND PORTION OF WEST HARBOUR WALL SOUTH OF PORT BURWELL HARBOUR FACILITY, LOOKING NORTHEAST. PHOTO 30: VIEW OF COMPLETED BOREHOLE MW102, NOTE THE SUBMARINE IN THE BACKGROUND WAS DELIVERED THE DAY OF THE ON-SITE DRILLING ACTIVITIES. THE SUBMARINE WAS THE REASON FOR ALL OF THE DREDGING ACTIVITIES. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..15 PHOTO 31: VIEW OF DRILLING BOREHOLE MW103 IN THE AREA OF THE TURNING BASIN INFILL TO ADDRESS APEC 1, LOOKING SOUTHEAST. � 6 : i M I •, , Ff �A G 1 1 e �O�I��r fi �,b� �.` "L "iV1 ,� ' ..�„ - � ,�';•� - ����'"'jffff �° . - �' - t+� � � . w �: � i 9 I _Raw ,F PHOTO 32: CLOSE-UP VIEW OF THE COMPLETED BOREHOLE MW103, IN AREA OF TURNING BASIN INFILL, LOOKING SOUTHEAST PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..16 PHOTO 33: VIEW OF TERRAPEX PERSONNEL AND STRATA SOIL DRILLING BOREHOLE SED1 TO ADDRESS APEC 1 IN BIG OTTER CREEK, LOOKING EAST. PHOTO 34: PHOTO OF DRILLING BOREHOLE SED 2 TO ADDRESS APEC 1. LOOKING EAST. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..17 PHOTO 35: PHOTO OF DRILLING BOREHOLE SED3 TO ADDRESS APEC 1, NEAR SOUTHERN END OF EAST CONCRETE PIER, LOOKING SOUTHEAST TOWARDS LAKE ERIE IN BACKGROUND. PHOTO 36: PHOTOGRAPH OF TERRAPEX PERSONNEL COLLECTING SEDIMENT SAMPLE SEDT FOR A BACKGROUND SAMPLE, USING THE ECKMAN DREDGE SAMPLER, LOOKING EAST FROM WEST SIDE OF WEST ARMOUR BREAKWALL. PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. CB664.00 ..18 APPENDIX III BOREHOLE LOGS LOG LEGEND SOIL TYPES SS GRAB SAMPLE: GS AUGER SAMPLE: AU SAND RC SILTY SAND III III SANDY SILT CLAYEY SAND DT SAND AND GRAVEL GRAVELMlillil SILT :: CLAYEY SILT CLAY � SILTY CLAY CLAYY SILTY %%%% CONCRETE SILTY GRAVEL SILTY CLAY AND GRAVEL ; ;', MIXED FILL: %'%' TOP SOIL and/or PEAT y ASPHALT BEDROCK WELL CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTIONS Pipe and Screen I I PIPE Packing and Backfill ESEALANT TERMINOLOGY ISCREEN CONCRETE im SAND SPT (n): Standard Penetration Test with (n) representing the number of blows required by a 140 pound hammer, falling from 30 inches, to drive a 2 inch O.D. split spoon sampler 1 foot into the soil. CSV: Combustable Soil Vapour measurement using Gastechtor Model 1238ME Hydrocarbon surveyor, or equivalent calibrated to hexane and set for methane elimination. PID: Soil Vapour measured with Photoionization Detector calibrated to isobutylene ppm: Parts Per Million %LEL: Percentage of the Lower Explosive Limit T.O.P: Top of Pipe Elevation Water/Product Levels T-Water level measured from ground surface, and the date. 0 -LNAPL level measured from ground surface and the date. SAMPLE METHOD SPLIT SPOON: SS GRAB SAMPLE: GS AUGER SAMPLE: AU ROCK CORE: RC DIRECT PUSH: DP DUALTUBE DT LAB RESULTS BTEX: Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes PHC (F1 -F4): Petroleum Hydrocarbons, F1 to F4 fractions VOCs: Volatile Organic Compounds PAHs: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons METALS: Metallic and Inorganic Parameters PCBs: Polychlorinated Biphenyls OCPs: Organochlorined Pesticides RECORD OF: MW101 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4720818.516 m, E 515667.377 m "T" ^TP p DAPEX ! loll it CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: DUAL TUBE Environmental Ltd. SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: GEOPROBE 7822 DT CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: STRATA DRILLING GROUP INC. SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'_ a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E 0 d H E �_ a) —� 0 w o 0_ � o 12 in 0 _ cn Z H o U) 0 a (D o az O .0 H ft m Ground Surface 0 0 OC TOPSOIL, SOME SAND AND ORGANICS x=Y_ BROWN, MOIST 1A DT 75 1.7 <10 ppm NONE PESTICIDES, 1 p q PRS l d u COAL CHIPS AND FINE SAND 1B DT 75 2.0 <10 m NONE BLACK AND LIGHT BROWN, MOIST C 0 2 o m U MEDIUM TO FINE SAND LIGHT BROWN, MOIST TO WET LL U 3 1 1C DT 75 1.4 25 ppm NONE METALS, pHm W C) C/) 4 5 6 WET 0 2 — 7 0 2 DT 80 t1 75 ppm NONE 8 m 9 10 3 -LIGHT BROWN AND GREY 11 a 12 3 DT 100 2.8 400 ppm NONE BTEX, PHCs(F1-F4), 0 as as 13 4 GRAIN SIZE — TRACE GRAVEL, ROCK FRAGMENTS U) 14 AND SEASHELLS 15 GREY 16 5 17 4 DT 100 2.3 50 ppm NONE 18 .. 19 6 20 21 22 5 DT 100 3.0 50 ppm NONE 23 7 24 25 END OF BOREHOLE 26 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2012 RECORD OF: MW102 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4721004.051 m, E 515737.250 m �+r? ^T p DPjj !! R it CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: DUAL TUBE Environmental Ltd. SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: GEOPROBE 7822 DT CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: STRATA DRILLING GROUP INC. SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a' a) � Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a d H E �_ a) —� 0 w o 0_ � o 12 in 0 _ cn Z o U) 0 a (D o az O .0 H 0 ft m 0 ;� Ground Surface OC TOPSOIL, SOME SAND AND ORGANICS 1A DT 80 46.7 75 ppm NONE PESTICIDES, BROWN, MOIST 1B DT 80 106.1 15 pprn NONE 12$158 0 1 COAL CHIPS BLACK, MOIST IL 2 MEDIUM TO FINE SAND m U LIGHT BROWN, MOIST TO WET 1C DT 80 49 20 ppm NONE METALS, pH u E (� 3 1 co 0 C� 4 5 6 2 -SOME GRAVEL AND SILT, GREY, WET 7 0 2 DT 80 18.1 10 ppm NONE 8 m 9 10 3 -LIGHT BROWN AND GREY 11 _0 12-- 3 DT 100 41.4 75 ppm NONE GRAIN SIZE 13 4 U) 14 15 16 5 17 4 DT 100 12.7175 ppm NONE BTEX, PHCs(F1-F4) 18 19 6 20 -COARSE TO MEDIUM, TRACE GRAVEL 21 22 5 DT 100 7.7 10 ppm NONE 23 7 24 25END OF BOREHOLE 26 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2012 RECORD OF: MW103 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4721212.244 m, E 515652.492 m CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: DUAL TUBE SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: GEOPROBE 7822 DT CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: STRATA DRILLING GROUP INC. SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E L, a m0- a Description �, o w CL m E a H E wn Q o (] Q 0 in z I—' o � a (D `o m O ft m Ground Surface 0 0 ;� TOPSOIL, SOME SAND AND ORGANICS BROWN, MOIST 1 MEDIUM TO FINE SAND, TRACE TO SOME SILT 2 LIGHT BROWN, MOIST TO WET 3--- 4__ 4 -WET 5 I I SANDY SILT, TRACE SEASHELLS GREY, BLACK AND BROWN, WET 6 II,, 2 7- 8 8 II' 9 II 10 3 11 I " TRACE CLAY, GREY AND LIGHT BROWN 12-- 2 13 13 4 I I 14 15=_I I I( GREY 16 5 II 17 I I 18 I I 19 II 6 II 20 I I 21-- 1 22 22 I I 23 7 II 24 I I 25 END OF BOREHOLE 1B I DT 1 80 2 1 DT 1 80 3 1 DT 1 100 4 1 DT 1 100 5 1 DT 1 100 1.0 TERPAPEX Environmental Ltd. Q 0 C SO] (n J � OC PESTICIDES, PCBs 1.0 35 ppm NONE METALS, PAHs, pH 12 175 ppm I NONE I GRAIN SIZE 1.8 175 ppm I NONE 1.0 125 pppm NONE BTEX, PHCs(F1-F4) 1 0 160 ppm I NONE Piezometer or Monitoring Well Installation LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 17, 2012 RECORD OF: SED1 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4721130.223 m, E 515732.619 m T'TERRAPEX CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: SS Environmental Ltd.SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: PIONJAR CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: STRATA DRILLING GROUP INC. SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a H E a) —� U w o Q � o O C M U) 0 _ cn Z o U) a (7 o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 3 1 4 5 6- 2 7 8 9 10 3 SILT, TRACE CLAY, SAND, SEA SHELL FRAGMENTS 11 GREY BTEX, PHCs (F1 -F4), 12 METALS, PAHS, 1 SS 80 0.2 ppm 40 ppm NONE OC 13q PESTICIDES, PCBs, pH, 14 INORGANICS 15 16 SOME FINE SAND 5 17 2 SS 80 0.2 ppm 25 ppm NONE CLAYEY SILT 18 GREY 19 6 20 21 BTEX, PHCs (F1 -F4), 22 METALS, PAHS, 3 SS 100 0.2 ppm 40 ppm NONE OC 23 7 PESTICIDES, PCBs, pH, 24 INORGANICS 25 END OF BOREHOLE 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SED2 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2012 _ CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4721015.048 m, E 515758.327 m '^TE p DAPEX CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: SS Environmental Ltd. SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: PIONJAR CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: STATA DRILLING GROUP INC. SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a H E (] a) —� U w o Q � o O C M U) 0 _ cn Z o U) Q a (7 o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 3 1 4 5 6- 2 7 8 9 10 3 11 BTEX,PHCs SANDY SILT, TRACE CLAY 12 GREY (F1 -F4), METALS, PAHS, 13 4 1 SS 80 0.1 ppm 25 ppm NONE OC PESTICIDES, 14 PCBs, pH, INORGANICS 15 16 5 17 CLAYEY SILT, TRACE SAND AND 2 SS 100 02 ppm 75 ppm NONE GRAIN SIZE 18 SEASHELLS GREY 19 6 20 21 BTEX, PHCs (F1 -F4), 22 METALS, PAHS, 3 SS 100 0.7 ppm 65 ppm NONE OC 23 7 PESTICIDES, PCBs, pH, 24 INORGANICS 25 END OF BOREHOLE 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SED3 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4720847.667 m, E 515776.786 m �+r? ^T p D P jj CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: SS Environmental Ltd.SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: PIONJAR CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: STRATA DRILLING GROUP INC. SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a H E a) —� U w o Q � o O C M U) 0 _ c/) Z H o U) d (7 o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 3 1 4 5 6- 2 7 8 9 10 3 11 12 BTEX, PHCs (F1 -F4), SANDY SILT, TRACE CLAY, 13 q GREY METALS, PAHS, 1 SS 80 0.2 ppm 10 ppm NONE OC 14 PESTICIDES, PCBs, pH, 15 INORGANICS FINE SAND, SOME SILT SOME SILT 16 BTEX, PHCs 5 (F1 -F4), 17 METALS, PAHS, 2 SS 100 0.2 ppm 50 ppm NONE OC 18 PESTICIDES, PCBs, pH, 19 - SOME CLAY INORGANICS 6 20 END OF BOREHOLE 21 22 23 7 24 25 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SED4 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 47211667.298 m, E 515657.050 m �+r? ^T p DPjj CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: GS Environmental Ltd.SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: ECKMAN DREDGE SAMPLER CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: TERRAPEX SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a H E a) —� U w o Q � o O C M U) 0 _ cn Z H o U) a (D o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 3 1 4 BTEX,PHCs 5 (Fl -F4), SILT, SOME SAND, TRACE ORGANICS, 1 GS 100 0.1 ppm <10 m NONE METALS,, PANS, 6 LEAVES, CLAY, pH, INORGANIC GREY 2 7 8 9 10 3 11 12 13 4 14 15 16 5 17 18 19 6 20 21 22 23 7 24 25 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SED5 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4721371.354 m, E 515727.107 m �+r? ^T p DPjj CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: GS � Environmental Ltd.SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: ECKMAN DREDGE SAMPLER CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: TERRAPEX SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a H E a) —� U w o Q � o O C M U) 0 _ cn Z o U) a (7 o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 3 1 4 BTEX,PHCs (F1 -F4), 5 META SANDYSILT 1 GS 100 0.3 ppm 40 m NONE 0C 6-- 6 GREY PESTICIDES, PCBs, pH, 2 INORGANICS 7 8 9 10 3 11 12 13 4 14 15 16 5 17 18 19 6 20 21 22 23 7 24 25 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SED6 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 47200627.673 m, E 515803.725 m T'TERRAPEX CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: GS Environmental Ltd.SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: ECKMAN DREDGE SAMPLER CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: TERRAPEX SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a H E a) —� U w o Q � o O C M U) 0 _ cn Z H o U) a (D o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 3 1 BTEX,PHCs 4 (F1 -F, FINE SAND 1 GS 100 0.1 ppm <10 PPM NONE METALS, PAHS, 5 GREY INORGANICS, pH, GRAIN SIZE 6- 2 7 8 9 10 3 11 12 13 4 14 15 16 5 17 18 19 6 20 21 22 23 7 24 25 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SEDT PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4720377.536 m, E 515284.228 m T'TERRAPEX CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: GS Environmental Ltd.SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: ECKMAN DREDGE SAMPLER CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: TERRAPEX SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation :E qCL as E a H E w o Q o M U) 0 _ cn Z o U) a (D o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 BTEX,PHCs (F1 -F4), METALS, PAHS, 3 1 OC FINE SAND, SOME SILT 1 GS 100 0.3 ppm 40ppm NONE GREY PESTICIDES, 4 PCBs, pH, INORGANICS 5 6 2 7 8 9 10 3 11 12 13 4 14 15 16 5 17 18 19 6 20 21 22 23 7 24 25 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SED8 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 +� CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4720098.971 m, E 516315.701 m '^TE p DAPEX CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: GS Environmental Ltd. SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: ECKMAN DREDGE SAMPLER CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: TERRAPEX SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a) Monitoring Well a Description �, o 0 w m m Installation L CL a5 as E a tY H E a) —� U w o Q � o O C M U) 0 _ cn Z o U) a (7 o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 3 1 4 5 6- --2 7 8 9 BTEX,PHCs (F1 -F4), 3 METALS, PAHS, 10 OC FINE SAND, TRACE SILT 1 GS 100 0.3 ppm <10ppm NONE GREY PESTICIDES, 11 PCBs, pH, INORGANICS 12 13 4 14 15 16 5 17 18 19 6 20 21 22 23 7 24 25 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 RECORD OF: SED9 PROJECT NO: CB664.00 BORING DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 CLIENT: PWGSC GPS UTM: N 4721032.922 m, E 516360.742 m "T" ^TP p DAPEX CLIENT PROJECT #: R.059352.008, R.059352.009 TYPE OF AUGER: GS Environmental Ltd. SITE LOCATION: PORT BURWELL TYPE OF RIG: ECKMAN DREDGE SAMPLER CITY / PROVINCE: ONTARIO CONTRACTOR: TERRAPEX SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE E CL Piezometer or ani a'— a ) Monitoring Well a Description w m Installation L CL E a) —U w C Oo M U) 0 _ cn Z o U) a (7 o az O H ft m0 Water Surface 0 WATER 1 2 BTEX,PHCs (F1 -F4), 3 1 METALS, PAHS, SANDY SILT, SOME CLAY, TRACE 1 GS 100 0.1 ppm <10 ppm NONE ORGANICS, LEAVES INORGANICS, 4 GREY pH, GRAIN SIZE 5 6- 2 7 8 9 10 3 11 12 13 4 14 15 16 5 17 18 19 6 20 21 22 23 7 24 25 26 8 27 28 29 LOGGED BY: RA INPUT BY: RA CHECKED BY: MVO INPUT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2012 APPENDIX IV WELL RECORDS c ��ntario Ministry of Well Tag No. (Place Sticker and/or Print Below) 5-17) 1 � /well Record the Environment Regulation 903 Ontario Water Resources Act Measurements recorded in: Vrmetric ❑ Imperial A120872 I. Z<LPage of Well Owner's Information First Name Last Name / Organization E-mail Address r ❑ Well Constructed e • , by Well Owner Mai i Address ( t et Number/Name) Municipality Province Postal Code Telephone No. (inc. area code) �111e1i Loc tion) L110 b 6 II 1 1 Address of Well Location (Street Number/Name) TownshipLot Concession (r L / Cr r �j County/District/Municipality City/Town/Village Provin Oce Postal Code rq- �`� ,� ntario UTM Coordinates I Zone , Eastinq Northinq Municipal Plan and Sublot Number Other NAD 1831 t 11151 t151I ,_Ik-�I J1 11-1 ��Lj015s11 1`L l Overburden and Bedrock Materials/Abandonment Sealina Record Isere in.ctrncNnn.c nn the hark of this fnrml General Colour Most Common Material Other Materials General Description Depth (mlft) From To From To ❑ Domestic (Material and Type) 0 l ❑ Boring ❑ Digging q/ ❑ Air percussion ❑ Industrial Other, specify J�h Aa?C Static Level 0 Construction Record - Casin Inside Open Hole OR Material Wall Dep Diameter (cin) (Galvanized, Fibreglass, Concrete, Plastic, Steel) Thickness (JV CJr/nry) From /j 7 r a-21 et w-. . % rJ 3 Well Use Pumping rate (I/min / GPM) ❑ Commercial ❑ Not used ❑ Municipal❑ Dewatering X'Test Hole Ej�Monitoring ❑ Cooling & Air Conditioning 4 4 Duration of pumping hrs + min 5 5 Final water level end of pumping (m/ft) 10 10 15 15 If flowing give rate (1/min / GPM) Status of Well 20 20 ih (m/ft) To ❑ Water Supply ❑ Replacement Well Prest Hole ❑ Recharge Well ❑ Dewatering Well DObservation and/or Monitoring Hole ❑ Alteration (Construction) ❑ Abandoned, Insufficient Supply ❑ Abandoned, Poor Z I _> i t r C G "xi :n Method of Construction Annular Spaee Depth Set at (m/ft) ❑ Cable Tool ❑ Diamond Type of Sealant Used From To ❑ Domestic (Material and Type) fiJi- - ❑ Livestock ❑ Boring ❑ Digging ❑ Irrigation ❑ Air percussion ❑ Industrial Other, specify J�h Aa?C Z I _> i t r C G "xi :n Method of Construction Construction Record - Sc Outside Diameter ❑ Cable Tool ❑ Diamond ❑ Public ❑ Rotary (Conventional) ❑ Jetting Down ❑ Domestic ❑ Rotary (Reverse) ❑ Driving fiJi- - ❑ Livestock ❑ Boring ❑ Digging ❑ Irrigation ❑ Air percussion ❑ Industrial Other, specify J�h Aa?C Static Level ❑ Other, specify Construction Record - Casin Inside Open Hole OR Material Wall Dep Diameter (cin) (Galvanized, Fibreglass, Concrete, Plastic, Steel) Thickness (JV CJr/nry) From /j 7 r a-21 et w-. . % rJ Depth (mfft) Water Quality Please provide a map below following instructions on the back. From To ❑ Abandoned, other, specify —•,.._ �-�r ✓', ❑ Other, specify Wim- Water Details Hole Diameter Water found at Depth Kind of Water: ❑ Fresh ❑ Untested Depth (m/ft) Diameter (m/ft) ❑Gas El Other, specify From To (cm/in) Water found at Depth Kind of Water: [I Fresh ❑Untested (m/ft) ❑ Gas ❑ Other, specify Water found at Depth Kind of Water: []Fresh ❑ Untested (m/ft) ❑ Gas ❑ Other, specify Well Contractor and Well Technician Information Business Name 0 Province Postal Code Business E-mail Well Contractors Licence No. Municipality oil jkq1111C Bus -Telephone No. (inc. area code) Name of glell Te hnician (Last Name, First Name) 171615tl (J z/1 ail -4 i v ly ��., T>I�-I11-7 0506E (2007/12) © Queen's Printer Ministry's Copy uommenw. l�lo wxti Well owner's Date Package Delivere information package delivered ❑ Yes Date Work Completed ❑ No �a10 11 �4 I 111 I , Ministry Use Only Audit No. 2.56853 Construction Record - Sc Outside Diameter Material (plastic, Galvanized, Steel) Slot No. (cm/in) Down Recovery j I. P'L fiJi- - )i Depth (mfft) Water Quality Please provide a map below following instructions on the back. From To ❑ Abandoned, other, specify —•,.._ �-�r ✓', ❑ Other, specify Wim- Water Details Hole Diameter Water found at Depth Kind of Water: ❑ Fresh ❑ Untested Depth (m/ft) Diameter (m/ft) ❑Gas El Other, specify From To (cm/in) Water found at Depth Kind of Water: [I Fresh ❑Untested (m/ft) ❑ Gas ❑ Other, specify Water found at Depth Kind of Water: []Fresh ❑ Untested (m/ft) ❑ Gas ❑ Other, specify Well Contractor and Well Technician Information Business Name 0 Province Postal Code Business E-mail Well Contractors Licence No. Municipality oil jkq1111C Bus -Telephone No. (inc. area code) Name of glell Te hnician (Last Name, First Name) 171615tl (J z/1 ail -4 i v ly ��., T>I�-I11-7 0506E (2007/12) © Queen's Printer Ministry's Copy uommenw. l�lo wxti Well owner's Date Package Delivere information package delivered ❑ Yes Date Work Completed ❑ No �a10 11 �4 I 111 I , Ministry Use Only Audit No. 2.56853 Results of Well Yield Testing Volume Placed (m3/ft3) After test of well yield, water was: ❑ Clear and sand free ❑ Other, specify Draw Down Recovery Water Level On/ft) - - Time (min) Water Level (m/ft) Time (min) If pumping discontinued, give reason: Static Level 1 1 Pump intake set at (m/ft) 2 2 3 3 Well Use Pumping rate (I/min / GPM) ❑ Commercial ❑ Not used ❑ Municipal❑ Dewatering X'Test Hole Ej�Monitoring ❑ Cooling & Air Conditioning 4 4 Duration of pumping hrs + min 5 5 Final water level end of pumping (m/ft) 10 10 15 15 If flowing give rate (1/min / GPM) Status of Well 20 20 ih (m/ft) To ❑ Water Supply ❑ Replacement Well Prest Hole ❑ Recharge Well ❑ Dewatering Well DObservation and/or Monitoring Hole ❑ Alteration (Construction) ❑ Abandoned, Insufficient Supply ❑ Abandoned, Poor Recommended pump depth (m/ft) 25 25 t" J Recommended pump rate (1/min/GPM) 30 30 40 40 Well production (1/min / GPM) 50 50 Disinfected? ❑ Yes ❑ No 60 60 Map of Well Location Depth (mfft) Water Quality Please provide a map below following instructions on the back. From To ❑ Abandoned, other, specify —•,.._ �-�r ✓', ❑ Other, specify Wim- Water Details Hole Diameter Water found at Depth Kind of Water: ❑ Fresh ❑ Untested Depth (m/ft) Diameter (m/ft) ❑Gas El Other, specify From To (cm/in) Water found at Depth Kind of Water: [I Fresh ❑Untested (m/ft) ❑ Gas ❑ Other, specify Water found at Depth Kind of Water: []Fresh ❑ Untested (m/ft) ❑ Gas ❑ Other, specify Well Contractor and Well Technician Information Business Name 0 Province Postal Code Business E-mail Well Contractors Licence No. Municipality oil jkq1111C Bus -Telephone No. (inc. area code) Name of glell Te hnician (Last Name, First Name) 171615tl (J z/1 ail -4 i v ly ��., T>I�-I11-7 0506E (2007/12) © Queen's Printer Ministry's Copy uommenw. l�lo wxti Well owner's Date Package Delivere information package delivered ❑ Yes Date Work Completed ❑ No �a10 11 �4 I 111 I , Ministry Use Only Audit No. 2.56853 �a(Place Ontario Ministry of e q No. Sticker and/or Print Well Record the Environment A 120 . 8 � 1 � Regulation 903 Ontario Water Resources Act Measurements recorded in: etric ❑Imperial L_ ,3 Page of Well Owner's Information First Name J S Last Name / Organization / E-mail Address ❑ Well Constructed �.y-,''tx�t I�3• t`,'1 tet' ��t.•�er.7 j arc.;=(=:_i.e, by Well Owner Mailing lAddress (Stre t Number/Name) Municipality Province Postal Cgde Telephone No. (inc. area code) Well Location I ' ' Address of JWell Location (Street Number/Name) Township Lot Concession County/District/Municipality City/Town/Village Province Postal Code 11-9", t-- Ontario UTM Coordinates Zone Easting Northing Municipal Plan and Sublot Number Other NAD 813 t 5 _7 '5 % r J 101 U Overburden and Bedrock Materials/Abandonment Sealina Record lcaa inetrnrtinnc nn tho hark nfthio fnrml General Colour Most Common Material Other Materials General Description Depth (m/ft) From To Tw 1 �I, �11 11e-; r..' ocL' e 1. rz) Annular Space Results of Well Yield Testing Depth Set at (m/ft) From To Type of Sealant Used (Material and Type) Volume Placed (m3/fi3) After test of well yield, water was: ❑ Clear and sand free ❑ Other, specify Draw Down Recovery Time (min) Water Level (m/ft) Time (min) Water Level (m/ft) C_ 5 y f _j 0, l If pumping discontinued, give reason: Static Level 1 1 Pump intake set at (m/ft) Pumping rate (I/min/GPM) 2 2 3 3 Method of Construction Well Use 4 4 ❑ Cable Tool ❑ Diamond ❑Rotary (Conventional) [I Jetting ❑ Rotary (Reverse) ❑ Driving ❑ Boring ❑ Digging ❑ Air percussion Other, specify CJ', re '� �e� S� ❑ Public ❑ Commercial ❑ Not used ❑Domestic El Municipal El Dewatering ❑ Livestock [fest Hole [ji Monitoring ❑ Irrigation ❑ Cooling & Air Conditioning ❑ Industrial ❑ Other, specify Duration of pumping hrs + min 5 5 — - Final water level end of pumping (m/ft) 10 10 15 15 If flowing give rate (!/min /GPM) Construction Record - Casing Status of Well 20 20 Inside Diameter (cin) Open Hole OR Material (Galvanized, Fibreglass, Concrete, Plastic, Steel) Wall Thickness (cm/in) Depth (m/ft) From To El Water Supply ❑ Replacement Well [�"f est Hole ❑Recharge Well ❑ Dewatering Well [4,05servation and/or Monitoring Hole ❑ Alteration (Construction) ❑ Abandoned, Supply ❑ Abandoned, Poor Water QualityPlease ❑Abandoned, other, specify Recommended pump depth (m/ft) 25 25 — – ��//. 7U L C Recommended pump rate (I/min/GPM) 30 30 40 40 Well production (Umin / GPM) 50 50 Disinfected? ❑ Yes ❑ No 60 1 1 60 Construction Record-ScreenInsufficient Map of Well Location Outside Diameter (cm/in) Material (Plastic, Galvanized, Steel) Slot No. De th m/ft p ( ) From To ,� provide a m p below (lowing i true io on a back. 'j� -'�––�W---''r r--•=��� eL hw �' / '� ,,..✓ 1 ( s %�/� ❑ Other, specify Water Details Hole Diameter Water found at Depth (m/ft) []Gas Water found at Depth (m/ft) E] Gas Kind of Water: []Fresh ❑ Untested ElOther, specify Kind of Water: E] Fresh ❑Untested ❑Other, specify Depth From (m/ft) To Diameter (cm/in) d i C. '�rd Water found at Depth (m/ft) El Gas Kind of Water: ❑ Fresh E] Untested ❑Other, specify Well Contractor and Well Technician Information Business Name of Well Contractor Well Contractors Licence No. Business Address (Street u er/Name) Id 7". Z. (,J e s7` be,,,r t+•. i"' i:.kt '(it,. Municipality Comments: Province L , A Postal Code// L t F:, Business E-mail Address JJ c,.) ra(�wx' Q -5,t' 4A..,Su• o., -1 Well owner's package information delivered ❑ Yes ❑ N0 Date Package Delivered Ministry Use Only Bus.Telephone No. (inc. area code) �j y f (� '1 G i i) I &,, I Y'll�t� Name of Well Technician (Last Name, First Name) (' a%! �. t te. Audit No. 1 5 06 8 5 5 Date Work Completed t Well Technician's Licence No. Signature ec ician nd ^r, ontractor D/a�te Submitted uountkzuutriz/ uUueen'sranterTor Untano,2007 / ✓ Ministry's Copy t Ontario Ministry of Well Taq No. (Place Sticker and/or Print Below) { j Well Record the Environment A �O o. 7 A Regulation 903 Ontario Water Resources Act ❑ Imeria Measurements recorded in: Metric p A 8+ 4 ( ` Gk 7zf Page of Well Owner's Information First Name Last Name /Organization E-mail Address Mail' !/g Address j (S'tieet Nu beer/Name) / ( + % Mu(n�icipali y Province Postal 30al df,l �� 1f( RULIi I.fr)i'�if\i fJ4i9If �I0G;'�y 1 Township ityiuistrict/Municipauty L;it)q sown/village ' y,/ d •1^ c, tom Coordinates Zone EastingNorthing Municipal Ian and Sublot Number NAD 813 1 qI 1 r t I I rburden and Bedrock Materials/Abandonment Sealing Record (see instructions on the back of this form) ❑ Well Constructed by Well Owner Telephone No. (inc. area code) Province Postal Code Ontario I I I I I General Colour Most Common Material Other Materials General Description Depth (m/ft) From ppTo 7 - Annular Space Results of Well Yield Testing Depth Set at (m/ft) From To Type of Sealant Used (Material anq Type) Volume Placed (M-1/ft) After test of well yield, water was: ❑ Clear and sand free ❑ Other, specify Draw Down Recovery Time (min) Water Level (m/ft) Time (min) Water Level (m/ft) r If pumping discontinued, give reason: Static Level 1 1 `7n sn v, Pump intake set at (m/ft) 2 2 3 3 Method of Construction Well Use Pumping rate (Amin / GPM) 4 4 ❑ Cable Tool ❑ Diamond ❑ Rota Conventional ❑ Jetting Rotary (Conventional) g ❑ Rotary (Reverse) ❑ Driving ❑ Boring ❑ Digging ❑ Air percussion (Other, specify ❑ Public ❑ Commercial ❑ Not used ❑ Domestic ❑Municipal Dewatering ❑ Livestock ;a -Test Hole Monitoring ❑ Irrigation ❑ Cooling & Air Conditioning ❑ Industrial ❑ Other, specify Duration of pumping hrs + min 5 5 Final water level end of pumping (m/ft) 10 10 15 15 If flowing give rate (I/min /GPM) Construction Record - Ca Ing Status of Well 20 20 Inside Diameter (cmin) Open Hole OR Material (Galvanized, Fibreglass, Concrete, Plastic, Steel) Wall Thickness (cin) Depth (m/ft) From To ❑ Water Supply ❑ Replacement Well est Hole ❑ _-Test Well ❑ Dewatering Well 2�-Observation and/or Monitoring Hole ❑ Alteration (Construction) ❑ Abandoned, Supply ❑ Abandoned, Poor ' Water Quality E] Abandoned, other, specify Recommended pump depth (m/ft) 25 25 v Recommended pump rate (1/min/GPM) 30 30 40 40 — Well production (1/min / GPM) 50 50 Disinfected? ❑ Yes ❑ No 60 60 - Construction Record - ScreenInsufficient Map of Well Location Outside Diameter (cm/in) Material (Plastic, Galvanized, Steel) Slot No, — Depth De m/ft) p ( From To Please provide a map below following instructions on fhe back. q r. i -r✓ / 2 Z ❑ Other, specifyt Water Details Hole Diameter Water found at Depth (m/ft) ❑ GasFrom Water found at Depth (m/ft) ❑ Gas Kind of Water: ❑ Fresh ❑ Untested ❑Other, specify Kind of Water: []Fresh El Untested ❑ Other, specify. Depth (m/ft) To - --- Diameter (cWln)— Water found at Depth (m/ft) El Gas Kind of Water: ❑ Fresh ❑ Untested ❑Other, specify Well Contractor and Well Technician Information Bu iness Name of Well Co tractor �y y Well Contractor's Licence No. BusinessAddress (Street QNumber/Name) P-1_7-:)_ ?C '.. . �' y a Municipality / ' I ) a rl Comments: f yr t z �.j ej ✓�'�C , �� 6,'ri • "� Cl1' {�•aftp �,. _ ) Well owner's Date Package Delivered Ministry Use Only ion Audit No. package delivered Date Work Completed Z 15 6 8 5 4 ❑ Yes 7 Province l/✓y Postal Code Business E-mail Address 7 ( Cc Bus.Telephone No. (inc. area code) 7 y Name of WeII Te hnician ( ast Nre, F st Name) yi . Well Technician's Lcpence o. Sig at e�of Techni ' and/or, ontractor Date Sfubmitted Obost (2007/12) © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2007 ® Ministry's Copy J APPENDIX V AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS TERRAPEX 1945 AERIAL PHOTO a IFINT ' Public Works and Government Services Canada Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO 1 , • w41 9 ,I R Pi. R 1 f wR k 7HS.M: ' 4• � ,, � �.4 RYA _ wr r z a ♦ IL :r �� JI ,wt, s _ _ A 1< y 0 250m 500m PROJECT# CB664.00 DATE DECEMBER 2012 (APPROXIMATE) DRAWN F CHECKED GLL SOURCE: NATIONAL AIR PHOTO LIBRARY, ROLL #A9125, PHOTO #50,1945. ORIGINAL SCALE 1:20,000. DRAWING # FIGURE V-1 1959 AERIAL PHOTO "I F1111 Works and TERRAPEX Government Govvernment Services Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Canada PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO 1 �I JF II l 0 500m 1km PROJECT# CB664.00 DATE DECEMBER 2012 (APPROXIMATE) DRAWN ^C CHECKED GLL SOURCE: NATIONAL AIR PHOTO LIBRARY, ROLL #A16532, PHOTO #80,1959. ORIGINAL SCALE 1:35,000. DRAWING # FIGURE V-2 "I F1111 _> 1966 AERIAL PHOTO TERRAPEX Go er Works and Government Services Canada Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO N 1 I .rl �r ij.. j 4 1 <.r 4 c - 0 250m 500m PROJECT# CB664.00 (APPROXIMATE) DATE DECEMBER 2012 DRAWN S!� � ICHECKED GLL DRAWING SOURCE: NATIONAL AIR PHOTO LIBRARY, ROLL #A19819, PHOTO #174,1966. ORIGINAL SCALE 1:25,000. FIGURE V-3 "I ICNI TERRAPEX 1973 AERIAL PHOTO Government Works and Govvernment Services Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Canada PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO IF Ail 40iko- fob '-r.+l � _r` - .� # ♦ [Fir '� i'i'i +fir' � /- �"�"'��+��,y-�� 111F = . err +. j• �.. $" - ' ����+• � �' ty�''k'• -t .+ �-J.i � f -� .ice / s �- M -. - 0 250m 500m n CB664.00 (APPROXIMATE) DATE DECEMBER 2012 DRAWN F CHECKED GLL DRAWING # SOURCE: NATIONAL AIR PHOTO LIBRARY, ROLL #A23285, PHOTO #196,1973. ORIGINAL SCALE 1:20,000. FIGURE V-4 TERRAPEX 2010 SATELLITE PHOTO "I DIT ' ment and Government Services Government Services Canada Environmental Ltd. SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO N - � f I PROJECT# CB664.00 0 250m 500m DATE DECEMBER 2012 (APPROXIMATE) DRAWN ^C CHECKED GLL SOURCE: VUMAP, FIRST BASE SOLUTIONS 2010 IMAGERY. DRAWING # FIGURE V-5 APPENDIX VI TOPOGRAPHIC MAP a iFlIT TERRAPEX TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Public Works and SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR Canadament Services Environmental Ltd. PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO 18 14 15 1E. 17 18 9 z' 19 ......... CB664.00 0 1km 2km SCALE AS SHOWN m-9 iiiia DATE DECEMBER 2012 (APPROXIMATE) DRAWN SF CHECKED GLL SOURCE: GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA, CENTRE FOR TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION, SHEET 40110. FIGURE VI -1 TERRAPEX Environmental Ltd. 1-1 F1 ONTARIO BASE MAP SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO t + +, :: ter, 176 11313 + r 1+ 11101 Public Works and Government Services Canada 0 500m 1km (APPROXIMATE) SOURCE: ERIS ECOLOG, ONTARIO BASE MAPPING (OBM) ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 193 + CB664.00 AS SHOWN DECEMBER 2012 SC CHECKED GLL FIGURE VI -2 APPENDIX VII PROPERTY TITLE SEARCH 80 Valleybrook Dr, Toronto, ON, M313 2S9 ECO 0 Phone: 416-510-5204 1 Email: info@eris.ca Toll Free: 1-866-517-5204 1 Fax: 416-510-5133 Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. www.{eris.ca October 18, 2012 Siratha Chhan Terrapex Environmental Ltd 920 Brant St. Unit 16 Burlington, ON L7 R4J 1 Dear Siratha Chhan: Re: Land Title Search Enclosed is information pertaining to the site "CB664.00 - Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour", located at Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, in Port Burwell, ON. The enclosed title information was obtained from the applicable Land Registry Office through access to the electronic Land Titles system. If required, additional historical titles can be obtained through a search of the hardcopy registry books. For the information enclosed, a charge of $43Cdnwilll be included on the relevant ERIS invoice. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the number below. Sincerely, Daniela Nigro 416-510-5204 ext 3579 traj 1l- Ontario ABSTRACT INDEX (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND REGISTRY OFFICE #11 35324-0223 (R) PAGE 1 OF 2 PREPARED FOR EEGoolab ON 2012/10/16 AT 14:37:18 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LT 1 E/S ERIEUS ST, 2 E/S ERIEUS ST, 3 E/S ERIEUS ST, 1 W/S STRACHAN ST, 2 W/S STRACHAN ST, 3 W/S STRACHAN ST, 4 W/S STRACHAN ST, 5 E/S STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; UNNUMBERED BLK E OF ERIEUS ST W OF STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; UNNUMBERED BLK E OF STRACHAN ST S OF HAGERMAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; SLOPE OF BANK AND BEACH PL 197 BAYHAM; LT 6 E/S GEORGE ST, 7 E/S GEORGE ST, 8 W/S GEORGE ST, 9 W/S GEORGE ST PL 197 BAYHAM; PT LT 2 W/S ERIEUS ST, 3 W/S ERIEUS ST, 4 E/S ERIEUS ST, 5 E/S ERIEUS ST, 5 W/S STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; PT HAGERMAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; PT RDAL FOR ERIEUS ST PL 12 BAYHAM; RDAL FOR STRACHAN ST PL 12 BAYHAM; PT LT 1 SIS PITT ST, 5 E/S GEORGE ST, 10 W/S GEORGE ST, 15 PL 197 BAYHAM; PT GEORGE ST PL 197 BAYHAM; PT BED OF LAKE ERIE BAYHAM PT 1 & 2 11R5137; BAYHAM PROPERTY REMARKS: PLANNING ACT CONSENT AS IN E186178. ESTATE/QUALIFIER: RECENTLY: FIRST CONVERSION FROM BOOK PIN CREATION DATE. 2007/04/23 REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CERT/ CHKD ** PRINTOU2 INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES (DELETED INSTRUMENTS NOT INCLUDED) ** DATE OF EARLIEST REGISTRATION LOADED: 1967 08/16 E121684 1967/08/16 TRANSFER $1,800 STOCK, DAVID J. B. C KLEIN, ROBERT E124432 1968/01/11 TRANSFER $3,200 ESSELTINE, IRWIN FRANCIS C ESSELTINE, LETA PEARL E143363 1970/08/21 TRANSFER $2 MURPHY, ANTHONY F. C E151664 1971/10/27 TRANSFER $5,100 MURPHY, ANTHONY F. C E151665 1971/10/27 DEPOSIT C E151752 1971/11/01 TRANSFER $5,000 STOCK, DAVID C STOCK, SUSAN E160949 1972/12/29 QUIT CLAIM TRNSFR $2 STOCK, SUSAN C E160950 1972/12/29 TRANSFER $2 KLEIN, TIIU C E163508 1973/04/19 CERT R SUC DU ACT C E178696 1974/10/31 TRANSFER $2 MURPHY, ANTHONY F. C E181531 1975/03/06 TRANSFER $30 MURPHY, ANTHONY F. C NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP. traj 1l- Ontario ABSTRACT INDEX (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER LAND REGISTRY OFFICE #11 35324-0223 (R) PAGE 2 OF 2 PREPARED FOR EEGoolab ON 2012/10/16 AT 14:37:18 REG. NUM. DATE INSTRUMENT TYPE AMOUNT PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CERT/ CHKD E184142 1975/06/11 TRANSFER $50 MURPHY, MARY E. C 11R764 1975/08/20 PLAN REFERENCE C E186178 1975/08/25 TRANSFER $2 STOCK, SUSAN C REMARKS: SKETCH ATTACHED. E186472 1975/09/04 TRANSFER $2 STOCK, SUSAN C REMARKS: SKETCH ATTACHED. E202930 1977/06/16 TRANSFER $2 MURPHY, ANTHONY F. C E208109 1977/12/14 QUIT CLAIM TRNSFR $99 THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF PORT BURWELL C E233344 1980/09/15 TRANSFER $2 STOCK, SUSAN C E233345 1980/09/15 DEPOSIT C 1185137 1992/11/04 PLAN REFERENCE C E364410 1995/10/13 TRANSFER $37,000 CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF PORT BURWELL C 11R6238 1996/05/03 PLAN REFERENCE C E382663 1997/12/18 AGREEMENT THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF PORT BURWELL C E424201 2003/03/20 RELEASE C RE ARKS: E382664 NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP. ® T ravIew" Oct 17, 2012 W+1� Protected by Copyright. May not be reproduced without permission. This map was compiled using plans and documents recorded in the land registration system and is prepared for property indexing purposes only. This is not a Plan of survey. For actual dimensions of property boundaries, see recorded plans and documents. Teranet Customer Service Centre: 1-800-208-5263 (Toronto: 416-360-1190) APPENDIX VIII CITY DIRECTORY SEARCH ECO LONG Environmental Fisk Iniormadan Smiees City Directory Information Source PROJECT NUMBER: 20121004007 Site Address: Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Port Burwell, ON Year: Site Listing: -No Civic Address Requested Adjacent Properties: 353430256 -No Civic Address Requested 353230155 -No Civic Address Requested 353230136 -No Civic Address Requested 353220141 -No Civic Address Requested 353230142 -No Civic Address Requested 353240167 -No Civic Address Requested 353230128 -No Civic Address Requested 353230135 -No Civic Address Requested -All listings for businesses were listed as they are in the city directory. -Listings that are residential are listed as "residential" with the number of tenants. The name of the residential tenant is not listed in the above city directory "Port Burwell, ON is not listed within the city directory archives" ECO LONG Environmenul Risk Infos m—tan Services APPENDIX IX RMS CORRESPONDENCE HE I RS TM Historical Environmental Information Reporting System Site Address, Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Proiect No: 20121004007 Opta ID No: 20121004007 Requested by: Eleanor Goolab Ecolog ERIS Date Completed: February 8, 2013 Opta Environmental Services Historical Environmental Information Reporting System (HEIRSTM) February 8, 2013 Eleanor Goolab Ecolog ERIS 80 Valleybrook Drive North York, Ontario M3B 2S9 Dear Eleanor, Re: Your Site Address: "Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Port Burwell, Ontario" Project No.: 20121004007 Opta Environmental Services Order ID: 20121004007 We are pleased to present our search results for "Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Port Burwell, Ontario" in the table below. The total cost for this report is $50.00 plus HST. Please see the Terms and Conditions for our search on page two of this report. Thank you for employing the services of Opta Information Intelligence. Regards, Niruja Shanmuganathan Opta Environmental Services opta INFORMATION INTEL UGENC'E i 150 Commerce Valley Drive W Markham, Ontario L3T 7Z3 T: 905.882.6300 Tall Free: 1.800.268.8080 t F: 905.695.6543 An SCM Company www.optainteLca Cost Information Year Comment Prior to HST Research Fee $50.00 flat research fee per street address. $50.00 Fire Insurance 1896 $100.00 for each Fire Insurance Plan. Plans (FIPs) Please note the entire area specified is not shown, however the surrounding 250m radius is shown. Please see Key Plan is attached for you to verify if this FIP is valuable to you. Client did not order. Insurance No Insurance Reports $55.00 for each Insurance Report. Report(s) were found in the Opta databases. Site Plan(s) No Site Plans were found $70.00 for each Site Plan. in the Opta databases, Total $50.00 The total cost for this report is $50.00 plus HST. Please see the Terms and Conditions for our search on page two of this report. Thank you for employing the services of Opta Information Intelligence. Regards, Niruja Shanmuganathan Opta Environmental Services opta INFORMATION INTEL UGENC'E i 150 Commerce Valley Drive W Markham, Ontario L3T 7Z3 T: 905.882.6300 Tall Free: 1.800.268.8080 t F: 905.695.6543 An SCM Company www.optainteLca Opta Environmental Services Historical Environmental Information Reporting System (HEIRSTM) Terms and Conditions Report The documents (hereinafter referred to as the "Documents") to be released as part of the report (hereinafter referred to as the "Report") to be delivered to the purchaser as set out above are documents in Opta's records relating to the described property (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"). Opta makes no representations or warranties respecting the Documents whatsoever, including, without limitation, with respect to the completeness, accuracy or usefulness of the Documents, and does not represent or warrant that these are the only plans and reports prepared in association with the Property. The Documents are current as of the dates) indicated on them. Interpretation of the Documents, if any, is by inference based upon the information which is apparent and obvious on the face of the Documents only. Opta does not represent, warrant or guarantee that interpretations other than those referred to do not exist from other sources. The Report will be prepared for use by the purchaser of the services as shown above hereof only. Disclaimer Opta disclaims responsibility for any losses or damages of any kind whatsoever, whether consequential or other, however caused, incurred or suffered, arising directly or indirectly as a result of the services (which services include, but are not limited to, the preparation of the Report provided hereunder), including but not limited to, any losses or damages arising directly or indirectly from any breach of contract, fundamental or otherwise, from reliance on Opta Reports or from any tortious acts or omissions of Opta's agents, employees or representatives. Entire Agreement The parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof. The request form constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or written, and there are no representations or warranties, or other agreements between the parties in connection with the subject matter hereof except as specifically set forth herein. No supplement, modification, waiver, or termination of the request shall be binding, unless confirmed in writing by the parties hereto. Governing Document In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between the provisions hereof and the Reports, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be deemed to be governed by the request form, which shall be the paramount document. Law This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein. 4r opta 1�1* INFORMATION INTEL UGENC'E Page 2 of 2 150 Commerce Valley arrive W i T: 905.882.6300 An SCM Company Markham, Ontario � Tall Free: 1.800.268.8080 www.optaintelza L3T 7Z3 F. 905.695.6543 From: Goolab, Eleanor To: Raymond Avuen Subject: FW: Opta Environmental Quote - Ecolog ERIS 20121004007 'Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Port Burwell, Ontario" Date: February 12, 2013 11:05:55 AM Attachments: Key Plan - Small Craft Harbour.pdf Hi Ray, Sorry for the confusion, here is the original quote with the correct key map. Please advise, Elle As requested, we have searched our records regarding the above site and the following information was found: Information Year Comment Cost Prior to HST Research Fee $50.00 flat research fee per $50.00 street address. Fire Insurance 1896 $100.00 for each Fire $100.00 Plans (FIPs) Insurance Plan. Please note the entire area specified is not shown, however the surrounding 250m radius is shown. Please see Key Plan is attached for you to verify if this FIP is valuable to you. Insurance No Insurance $55.00 for each Insurance Report(s) Reports were Report. found in the Opta databases. Site Plan(s) No Site Plans were $70.00 for each Site Plan. found in the Opta databases, Sub -Total $150.00 Please advise us if you wish to order any of the above information. The cost is $150.00 plus courier charges (if applicable) and HST. If we do not hear from you within two (2) weeks from the date of this correspondence, we will invoice our research fee(s). Please see Terms & Conditions. 0 APPENDIX X ECOLOG ERIS REPORT Canada's Primary Environmental Risk Information Service Project Site: Client: ERIS Project No: Report Type: Prepared By: Date: DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE CB664.00 Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, ON Raymond Ayuen Terrapex Environmental Ltd 49 Coldwater Road Toronto, ON M3B1Y8 20130207013 Custom Report - .3km Search Radius Shermin Haider shaiderCeris.ca February 11, 2013 The information contained in this report has been produced by EcoLog ERIS Ltd. using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and Provincial government departments. Although EcoLog ERIS Ltd. has endeavoured to present you with information that is accurate, EcoLog ERIS Ltd. disclaims, except as set out below, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of EcoLog ERIS Ltd. is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. The report applies only to the address specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. This report is solely intended to be used to focus further investigation and is not intended to replace a full Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment. No page of this report should be used without this cover page, this disclaimer and the project property identifier. The contents of this Service are protected by copyright. Copyright in the Service is owned by EcoLog ERIS Ltd. Copyright in data obtained from private sources is owned by EcoLog ERIS Ltd. or its licensors. The Service and its contents may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of EcoLog ERIS Ltd. SF 12 Concorde Place, suite Boo Toronto, Ontario M3C 4J2 06-510-5204 + Fax: 416-510-5133 Tell Free: i-866-517-5204. www.eris.ca o into eris.ca Table of Contents Order Number: 20130207013 Site Name: CB664.00 Site Address: Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, ON Report Type: Custom Report, 0.30 km Search Radius Rnr_tinn Report Summary This outlines the number of records from each database that fall on the site, and within various distances from the site. Site Diagram The records that were found within a specified distance from the project property (the primary search radius) have been plotted on a diagram to provide you with a visual representation of the information available. Sites will be plotted on the diagram if there is sufficient information from the database source to determine accurate geographic coordinates. Each plotted site is marked with an acronym identifying the database in which the record was found (i.e., WDS for Waste Disposal Sites). These are referred to as "Map Keys". A variety of problems are inherent when attempting to associate various government or private source records with locations. EcoLog ERIS has attempted to make the best fit possible between the available data and their positions on the site diagram. Site Profile This table describes the records that relate directly to the property that is being researched. Detail Report iv This section represents information, by database, for the records found within the primary search radius. Listed at the end of each database are the sites that could not be plotted on the locator diagram because of insufficient address information. These records will not have map keys. They have been included because they may be found to be relevant during a more detailed investigation. Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Page Borehole 1 Certificates of Approval 8 Compliance and Convictions 11 Environmental Compliance Approval 12 ERIS Historical Searches 13 List of TSSA Expired Facilities 14 Contaminated Sites on Federal Land 15 Fuel Storage Tank 23 Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary 25 TSSA Incidents 28 National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) 29 Non -Compliance Reports 30 National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES) 31 Ontario Oil and Gas Wells 32 Pesticide Register 33 Private and Retail Fuel Storage Tanks 34 Scott's Manufacturing Directory 35 Ontario Spills 36 Water Well Information System 39 Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Report Summary Order Number: 20130207013 Site Name: CB664.00 Site Address: Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, ON Report Type: Custom Report, 0.30 km Search Radius Database Number of Mappable Records Surrounding the Site Selected On-site Within 0.30 0.30km to 0.30km Total AAGR Abandoned Aggregate Inventory Y 0 0 0 0 AGR Aggregate Inventory Y 0 0 0 0 AMIS Abandoned Mine Information System Y 0 0 0 0 ANDR Anderson's Waste Disposal Sites Y 0 0 0 0 AUWR Automobile Wrecking & Supplies Y 0 0 0 0 BORE Borehole Y 0 7 0 7 CA Certificates of Approval Y 0 6 0 6 CFOT Commercial Fuel Oil Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 CHEM Chemical Register Y 0 0 0 0 COAL Coal Gasification Plants Y 0 0 0 0 CONV Compliance and Convictions Y 0 0 0 0 CPU Certificates of Property Use Y 0 0 0 0 DRL Drill Hole Database Y 0 0 0 0 EASR Environmental Activity and Sector Registry Y 0 0 0 0 EBR Environmental Registry Y 0 0 0 0 ECA Environmental Compliance Approval Y 0 2 0 2 EEM Environmental Effects Monitoring Y 0 0 0 0 EHS ERIS Historical Searches Y 0 3 0 3 EIIS Environmental Issues Information System Y 0 0 0 0 EXP List of TSSA Expired Facilities Y 0 2 0 2 FCON Federal Convictions Y 0 0 0 0 FCS Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Y 3 10 0 10 FOFT Fisheries & Oceans Fuel Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 FST Fuel Storage Tank Y 0 7 0 7 GEN Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary Y 0 7 0 7 HINC TSSA Historic Incidents Y 0 0 0 0 IAFT Indian & Northern Affairs Fuel Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 INC TSSA Incidents Y 0 1 0 1 LIMO Landfill Inventory Management Ontario Y 0 0 0 0 MINE Canadian Mine Locations Y 0 0 0 0 MNR Mineral Occurrences Y 0 0 0 0 NATE National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) Y 0 0 0 0 NCPL Non -Compliance Reports Y 0 0 0 0 NDFT National Defence & Canadian Forces Fuel Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 NDSP National Defence & Canadian Forces Spills Y 0 0 0 0 NDWD National Defence & Canadian Forces Waste Disposal Sites Y 0 0 0 0 NEES National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES) Y 0 0 0 0 NPCB National PCB Inventory Y 0 0 0 0 NPRI National Pollutant Release Inventory Y 0 0 0 0 OGW Oil and Gas Wells Y 0 0 0 0 OOGW Ontario Oil and Gas Wells Y 0 1 0 1 OPCB Inventory of PCB Storage Sites Y 0 0 0 0 Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Section i Report Summary Order Number: 20130207013 Site Name: CB664.00 Site Address: Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, ON Report Type: Custom Report, 0.30 km Search Radius Database Selected On-site Within 0.30 0.30km to 0.30km Total ORD Orders Y 0 0 0 0 PAP Canadian Pulp and Paper Y 0 0 0 0 PCFT Parks Canada Fuel Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 PES Pesticide Register Y 0 3 0 3 PINC TSSA Pipeline Incidents Y 0 0 0 0 PRT Private and Retail Fuel Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 PTTW Permit to Take Water Y 0 0 0 0 REC Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Receivers Summary Y 0 0 0 0 RSC Record of Site Condition Y 0 0 0 0 RST Retail Fuel Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 SCT Scott's Manufacturing Directory Y 0 1 0 1 SPL Ontario Spills Y 1 5 0 5 SRDS Wastewater Discharger Registration Database Y 0 0 0 0 TANK Anderson's Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 TCFT Transport Canada Fuel Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 VAR Variances for Abandonment of Underground Storage Tanks Y 0 0 0 0 WDS Waste Disposal Sites - MOE CA Inventory Y 0 0 0 0 WDSH Waste Disposal Sites - MOE 1991 Historical Approval Inventory Y 0 0 0 0 WWIS Water Well Information System Y 1 15 0 15 TOTAL 5 70 0 70 The databases chosen by the client as per the submitted order form are denoted in the'Selected' column in the above table. Counts have been provided outside the primary buffer area for cursory examination only. These records have not been examined or verified, therefore, they are subject to change. Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Section i SITE DIAGRAM ECOLOiG r4 PinpointingYbur Environmental Risks 80 Valleybrook Dr, Toronto, ON M3B 2S9 416-510-5204 Project Property: CB664.00 Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, ON ERIS Project #: 20130207013 Date: FEB -11-2013 LEGEND �I Project Property Landuse Classifications A Database Location Open Area Points of Interest Residential 1 Chimney Commercial Resource and Industrial O Silo Government and Institutional Pipe & Transmission Lines Parks and Recreational ----- Pipeline Waterbody ------ Transmission Line Recreation Transmission Tower Course/Driving Range -Golf Transformer Station - Park/Sports Field Rail Other Recreation Area Railway - Main — Sports/Race Track — Railway - Sidetrack Cemetery + Railway -Abandoned �J Campground ■ ■ Bridge ■ ■ Tunnel Vegetation Transportation - Other Wooded Area - Embankment Orchard Trail Vineyard Runway Industrial Resources Hydrographic Features L L Conveyor Permanent Waterway }� Crane: Moveable Intermittent Waterway Crane: Stationary Open Reservoir Tank Dyke/Levee Rock Cut Dam Auto Wrecker LL Breakwall r_ Lumber Yard ® Wetland Pit —This diagram is to be used solely for relative street location purposes. — It may not accurately portray street or site positions. me az��p oAX oy3 o / \ 0 0.451 1 ilwwss Kilometers BURWELL _ sPL§ I N VEVA'FERLOD ST IY {� PES I I I Es„aa LIBBYESF I I WELLINGTONS o FS I W 4�e I SP I I ssNsr BROCK ST e Lw 'I KES ., 4'I wwisi H GGERMAN ST_—_sms ` HORE�/NE a 1 / x I / / I �\ 1 ? 1 \ �3 L----------1 I I � I \ \ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I II Fps, I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I II I----------- I I 1 / \\\\— — — — — -- Section ii Site Report Order Number: Site Name: Site Address: Report Type: 20130207013 CB664.00 Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, ON Custom Report, 0.30 km Search Radius Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Map Key Company Name FCS -1 FCS -9 FCS -10 Ontario Spills Map Key Company Name SPL -3 ONTARIO CLEAN WATER AGENCY Address Address UNION ST AND BROCK ST PUMP STATIONS PORT BURWELL WPCP FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION, REFER TO DETAIL REPORT City Postal Code Bayham Bayham Bayham City Postal Code BAYHAM MUNICIPALITY Water Well Information System Map Key Company Name Address City Postal Code WWIS-8 Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Section iii Detail Report Order Number: 20130207013 Site Name: CB664.00 Site Address: Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell ON Report Type: Custom Report, 0.30 km Search Radius If information is required for sites located beyond the selected address, please contact your ERIS representative. Borehole Certificates of Approval Compliance and Convictions Environmental Compliance Approval ERIS Historical Searches List of TSSA Expired Facilities Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Fuel Storage Tank Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary TSSA Incidents National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) Non -Compliance Reports National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES) Ontario Oil and Gas Wells Pesticide Register Private and Retail Fuel Storage Tanks Scott's Manufacturing Directory Ontario Spills Water Well Information System Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Section iv Provincial Source Database Borehole Map Key Company Address Borehole ID Type Use BORE -1 856372 Borehole Geotechnical/Geological Investigation Status: Decommissioned Drill Method: Boring UTM Zone: 17 Easting: 515863.000 Northing: 4721814.000 Location Accuracy: Orig. Ground Elevation(m): 180 Elev. Reliability Note: DEM Ground Elevation(m): 182.500000 Total Depth(m): 8.100000 Primary Name: Township: BAYHAM Concession: CON 1 Lot: LOT 11 Municipality Completion Date: 1966 -OCT -7 Static Water Level: 1.700000 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Location Description: Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek Stratum ID Top Depth(m) Bottom Depth(m 218616119 0 1.200000 218616120 1.200000 8.100000 Stratum Desc Topsoil (Fill) Very stiff grey silty clay (Glacial Till) Page 1 of Borehole Page 1 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Borehole Map Key Company Address Borehole ID Type Use BORE -2 856371 Borehole Geotechnical/Geological Investigation Status: Decommissioned Drill Method: Boring UTM Zone: 17 Easting: 515842.000 Northing: 4721831.000 Location Accuracy: Orig. Ground Elevation(m): 175 Elev. Reliability Note: DEM Ground Elevation(m): 175.699997 Total Depth(m): 14.200000 Primary Name: Township: BAYHAM Concession: CON 1 Lot: LOT 11 Municipality Completion Date: 1966 -OCT -7 Static Water Level: 1.200000 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Location Description: Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek Stratum ID Top Depth(m) Bottom Depth(m 218616116 0 0.500000 218616117 0.500000 1.400000 218616118 1.400000 14.200000 Stratum Desc Topsoil Dark brown sandy silt Very stiff grey silty clay. (Glacial till) Page 2 of Borehole Page 2 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Borehole Map Key Company Address Borehole ID Type Use BORE -3 856370 Borehole Geotechnical/Geological Investigation Status: Decommissioned Drill Method: Boring UTM Zone: 17 Easting: 515797.000 Northing: 4721857.000 Location Accuracy: Orig. Ground Elevation(m): 174.600006 Elev. Reliability Note: DEM Ground Elevation(m): 174.500000 Total Depth(m): 14.200000 Primary Name: Township: BAYHAM Concession: CON 1 Lot: LOT 11 Municipality Completion Date: 1966 -OCT -7 Static Water Level: 0.800000 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Location Description: Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek Stratum ID Top Depth(m) Bottom Depth(m 218616114 0 2.600000 218616115 2.600000 14.200000 Stratum Desc Loose dark brown organic sandy silt Very stiff greyish brown silty clay (Glacial Till) Page 3 of Borehole Page 3 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Borehole Map Key Company Address Borehole ID Type Use BORE -4 856369 Borehole Geotechnical/Geological Investigation Status: Decommissioned Drill Method: Boring UTM Zone: 17 Easting: 515773.000 Northing: 4721875.000 Location Accuracy: Orig. Ground Elevation(m): 175.699997 Elev. Reliability Note: DEM Ground Elevation(m): 179 Total Depth(m): 11.100000 Primary Name: Township: BAYHAM Concession: CON 1 Lot: LOT 11 Municipality Completion Date: 1966 -OCT -4 Static Water Level: 1.800000 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Location Description: Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek Stratum ID Top Depth(m) Bottom Depth(m 218616109 0 0.600000 218616110 0.600000 2.100000 218616111 2.100000 39.400002 218616112 39.400002 5.600000 218616113 5.600000 11.100000 Page 4 of Borehole Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Stratum Desc Gravel fill Loose black organic sandy silt Loose dark brown organic silty fine sand Loose grey silty fine sand containing roots Very stiff greyish -brown silty clay (Glacial till) Page 4 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database Borehole Map Key Company Address Borehole ID Type Use BORE -5 856373 Borehole Geotechnical/Geological Investigation Status: Decommissioned Drill Method: Boring UTM Zone: 17 Easting: 515780.000 Northing: 4721884.000 Location Accuracy: Orig. Ground Elevation(m): 175.199997 Elev. Reliability Note: DEM Ground Elevation(m): 179.300003 Total Depth(m): 5 Primary Name: Township: BAYHAM Concession: CON 1 Lot: LOT 11 Municipality Completion Date: 1966 -OCT -20 Static Water Level: 1.300000 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Location Description: Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek Stratum ID Top Depth(m) Bottom Depth(m 218616121 0 0.300000 218616122 0.300000 3 218616123 3 4.700000 218616124 4.700000 5 Stratum Desc Gravel fill Loose black organic sandy silt Loose grey silty fine sand containing roots Very stiff grey silty clay Page 5 of Borehole Page 5 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Borehole Map Key Company Address Borehole ID Type Use BORE -6 856374 Borehole Geotechnical/Geological Investigation Status: Decommissioned Drill Method: Boring UTM Zone: 17 Easting: 515764.000 Northing: 4721889.000 Location Accuracy: Orig. Ground Elevation(m): 175.699997 Elev. Reliability Note: DEM Ground Elevation(m): 180.800003 Total Depth(m): 8.200000 Primary Name: Township: BAYHAM Concession: CON 1 Lot: LOT 11 Municipality Completion Date: 1966 -OCT -20 Static Water Level: 1.500000 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Location Description: Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek Stratum ID Top Depth(m) Bottom Depth(m 218616125 0 0.200000 218616126 0.200000 0.600000 218616127 0.600000 2.100000 218616128 2.100000 7.200000 218616129 7.200000 8.200000 Page 6 of Borehole Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Stratum Desc Gravel fill Fine sand Loose dark grey organic sandy silt Loose grey silty fine sand, trace of medium sand Very stiff grey silty clay (Glacial Till) Page 6 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database Borehole Map Key Company Address Borehole ID Type Use BORE -7 856375 Borehole Geotechnical/Geological Investigation Status: Decommissioned Drill Method: Boring UTM Zone: 17 Easting: 515753.000 Northing: 4721898.000 Location Accuracy: Orig. Ground Elevation(m): 176.199997 Elev. Reliability Note: DEM Ground Elevation(m): 181 Total Depth(m): 8.400000 Primary Name: Township: BAYHAM Concession: CON 1 Lot: LOT 11 Municipality Completion Date: 1966 -OCT -20 Static Water Level: 2.200000 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Location Description: Port Burwell Bridge, Elgin County, where County Road 42 crosses Big Otter Creek Stratum ID Top Depth(m) Bottom Depth(m 218616131 0.200000 1.400000 218616132 1.400000 7.700000 218616133 7.700000 8.400000 218616130 0 0.200000 Stratum Desc Black sandy silt till Loose to compact grey silty fine sand, traces of decomposed wood Very stiff grey silty clay Gravel fill Page 7 of Borehole Page 7 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Certificates of Approval Map Key Company Address Certificate # Application Issue Date Approval Type Status Application Type Year CA -1 The Corporation of the 1 Chatham St Municipality of Bayham Bayham CA -2 The Corporation of the Municipality 1 Chatham Street of Bayham Bayham CA -3 The Corporation of the Municipality 1 Chatham Street of Bayham Bayham CA -4 The Corporation of the Municipality 1 Chatham St of Bayham Bayham Page 1 of Certificates of Approval Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. 6348-7QAJBF 2009 6/1/2009 Municipal and Private Approved Sewage Works Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: 7337-66YQL4 2005 1/19/2005 Municipal and Private Revoked and/or Replaced Sewage Works Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: 1126- 2004 2/25/2004 Municipal and Private Revoked and/or Replaced 5TWQBU Sewage Works Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: 8397-7NKSVZ 2009 2/11/2009 Municipal and Private Revoked and/or Replaced Sewage Works Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: Page 8 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database Map Key Company Address Certificates of Approval Certificate # Application Issue Date Approval Type Status Year CA -5 Her Majesty the Queen in right of 9 Wilson Lane 9690-88LNTF 2010 12/23/2010 Municipal and Private Approved Ontario as represented by the Bayham Sewage Works Minister of Natu Page 2 of Certificates of Approval Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Approved in 1992 Approved Approved Application Type Page 9 of Detail Report Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: CA -6 PORT BURWELL VILL.- PITT ST. ROW/ERIEUS ST. 3-1670-91- 91 1/9/1992 Municipal sewage VICTORIA ST. PORT BURWELL VILL. Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: n/a PORT BURWELL VILLAGE ADDISON ST./WELLINGTON ST. 3-1545-94- 94 12/8/1994 Municipal sewage PORT BURWELL VILL. Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: n/a PEMBINA EXPLORATION LTD. LOT 11/CON.1, PLAN 11R-990 8-1297-95- 95 11/3/95 Industrial air PORT BURWELL VILL. 006 Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: DIESEL STORAGE TABK AT DOCKSIDE SITE Contaminants: Hexane Emission Control: No Controls Page 2 of Certificates of Approval Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Approved in 1992 Approved Approved Application Type Page 9 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database Certificates of Approval Map Key Company Address Certificate # Application Issue Date Approval Type Status Application Type Year n/a Chatham Street 00 3/2/00 Municipal & Private water Cancelled New Certificate of Approval Bayham Client Name: Municipality Of Bayham Client Address: 14 Plank Road North Client City: Bayham Client Postal Code: Project Description: Watermain to supply adequate process water for the operation of the new vortex grit separator. Contaminants: Emission Control: n/a Chatham Street 4253-4GSJSJ 00 2/24/00 Municipal & Private water Approved New Certificate of Approval Bayham Client Name: Municipality of Bayham Client Address: 14 Plank Road North Client City: Bayham Client Postal Code: Project Description: This is an extension of a watermain. Contaminants: Emission Control: n/a Jo -Lynn Construction Inc. Part of Lot 13, Concession 1 0224-82CSKR 2010 2/11/2010 Municipal and Private Approved Bayham Sewage Works Client Name: Client Address: Client City: Client Postal Code: Project Description: Contaminants: Emission Control: Page 3 of Certificates of Approval Page 10 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Compliance and Convictions Map Key Company Address File No. Crown Brief No. Ministry District Region n/a ONTARIO CLEAN WATER 98-0204-0248 SARNIA & HURON SOUTH WEST REGION AGENCY COUNTY Description: DISCHARGE OF MATERIAL, NAMELY SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION, INTO OR IN THE CHALMERS DRAIN, THAT MAY IMPAIR QUALITY OF THE WATER. Date Fine Act/Regulation/Section Charge Disposition Charged 11/10/00 $10,000.00 OWRA- -30(1) SUSPENDED SENTENCE Page 1 of Compliance and Convictions Page 11 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Environmental Compliance Approval Map Key Company Address CofA Number Date Status Project Type ECA -1 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of 9 Wilson Lane 3904-8PSQLV 1/13/2012 Approved Municipal and Private Sewage Ontario as represented by the Bayham Minister of Natu ECA -2 Jason Lee Velenosi 31 Erieus St Port Burwell 6589-8RWS5P 3/12/2012 Approved Waste Management System Bayham Page 1 of Environmental Compliance Approval Page 12 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Private Source Database ERIS Historical Searches Map Key Company Address Order No. Report Date Report Type Search Radius (km) EHS-1 16 Wellington St 20000208004 2/11/00 Port Burwell Addit. Info Ordered: EHS-2 36 Robinson Street 20070117011 1/18/2007 Port Burwell NOJ 1 T Addit. Info Ordered: EHS-3 No Municipal Address 20100910003 9/13/2010 Port Burwell Addit. Info Ordered: Page 1 of ERIS Historical Searches Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Complete Report 0.40 CAN - Complete Report 0.25 Site Report 0.25 Page 13 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database List of TSSA Expired Facilities Map Key Company Address Instance ID Instance Number Context Status: EXP -1 BIG OTTER MARINA & 5 BRIDGE ST LOT 11 CON 1 CAMPGROUNDS PORT BURWELL EXP -2 BIG OTTER MARINA & 5 BRIDGE ST LOT 11 CON 1 CAMPGROUNDS PORT BURWELL n/a LEEDS TRANSIT SALES LTD LOT 13 CON 1 ELGIN Page 1 of List of TSSA Expired Facilities Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. 287846 29372310 FS Liquid Fuel Tank EXPIRED Description: FS Liquid Fuel Tank 288348 29372309 FS Liquid Fuel Tank EXPIRED Description: FS Liquid Fuel Tank 386691 9622185 FS Facility EXPIRED Description: FS Propane Refill Cntr - Cylr Fill Page 14 of Detail Report Federal Source Database Map Key Company Address Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Site Name FCS -1 Bayham 00013964 C F 00271 85247 Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80909 Latitude: 42.63242 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Highest Step Completed: Identify Suspect Sites Action Plan: Additional Info: Unassessed Medium Contaminant Page 1 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Page 15 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Federal Source Database Map Key Company FCS -2 Page 2 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Address Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Bayham 00012785 C S 04766 54022 Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80565 Latitude: 42.639856 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Remediation Highest Step Completed: Historical Review Action Plan: Additional Info: Site Name Sediment - E of Talisman ASTs - Metals, Pesticide Medium Contaminant Sediment PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) Sediment PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Sediment Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) and PCDD/Fs (polychlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxin/dibenzofuran) Sediment Other organics Page 16 of Detail Report Federal Source Database Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Map Key Company Address Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Site Name FCS -3 Bayham 00012786 C S 04766 54022 Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80565 Latitude: 42.639856 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Other Highest Step Completed: Historical Review Action Plan: Additional Info: Medium Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Page 3 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Sed. -26 m W of Concrete Pier (N Corner) -Pesticide Contaminant PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Pesticides Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Page 17 of Detail Report Federal Source Database Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Map Key Company Address Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Site Name FCS -4 Bayham 00016589 C S 04766 54022 Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80565 Latitude: 42.639856 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Remediation Highest Step Completed: Historical Review Action Plan: Additional Info: Medium Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Page 4 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Sediment - 12 m W of Concrete Pier (North Corner) Contaminant PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Page 18 of Detail Report Federal Source Database Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Map Key Company Address Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Site Name FCS -5 Bayham 00016590 C S 04766 54022 Surface Soil - East Beach Property Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80565 Latitude: 42.639856 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Remediation Highest Step Completed: Historical Review Action Plan: Additional Info: Medium Contaminant Soil Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Page 5 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Page 19 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Federal Source Database Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Map Key Company Address Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Site Name FCS -6 Bayham 00016591 C S 04766 54022 Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80565 Latitude: 42.639856 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Remediation Highest Step Completed: Historical Review Action Plan: Additional Info: Medium Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Page 6 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Sediment - Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant Contaminant PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons) PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) Metal, metalloid, and organometallic PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) and PCDD/Fs (polychlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxin/dibenzofuran) Page 20 of Detail Report Federal Source Database Map Key Company Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Address Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Site Name FCS -7 Bayham 00016592 C S 04766 54022 Sediment - West of Concrete & East Steel Dock (SW) Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80565 Latitude: 42.639856 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Remediation Highest Step Completed: Historical Review Action Plan: Additional Info: Medium Contaminant Sediment Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) FCS -8 Bayham 00016593 C S 04766 54022 Sediment - North of East Steel Dock Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80565 Latitude: 42.639856 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Remediation Highest Step Completed: Historical Review Action Plan: Additional Info: Medium Contaminant Sediment Metal, metalloid, and organometallic Sediment Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolved solids, turbidity, etc.) Page 7 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Page 21 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Federal Source Database Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Map Key Company Address Site Id Departmental Id Property No. Site Name FCS -9 Bayham 00013966 C F 00273 85266 Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.807199 Latitude: 42.639909 Reporting Organization: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Other Highest Step Completed: Action Plan: Additional Info: Medium FCS -10 Bayham 00013968 C F 00275 85246 Location: Municipality: Bayham Census Division: Elgin Federal Electoral District: Elgin--Middlesex--London Nearest Populated Area: Longitude: -80.80833 Latitude: 42.64194 Reporting Organization: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Reason for Involvement: Federal Real Property Est m' Contaminated: 0 Est Ha Contaminated: 0 Est Tons Contaminated: 0 Site Management Strategy: Highest Step Completed: Identify Suspect Sites Action Plan: Additional Info: Unassessed Medium Page 8 of Contaminated Sites on Federal Land Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Contaminant Contaminant Page 22 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database Fuel Storage Tank Map Key Company Address License Issue Date Tank Status Tank Status As Of Operation Type Facility Type FST -1 BRADFIELDS MARINA 6 HURLEY LANE January 2010 Retail Fuel Outlet FS MARINA PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 Status Capacity (L) Year of Installation Corrosion Protection Tank Fuel Type Active 4500 1996 Painted Liquid Fuel Double Wall UST - Gasoline FST -2 BRADFIELDS MARINA 6 HURLEY LANE June 2011 Retail Fuel Outlet FS MARINA PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 Status Capacity (L) Year of Installation Corrosion Protection Tank Fuel Type Active 4500 1996 Painted Liquid Fuel Double Wall UST - Gasoline FST -3 BRADFIELDS MARINA 6 HURLEY LANE June 2010 Retail Fuel Outlet FS MARINA PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 Status Capacity (L) Year of Installation Corrosion Protection Tank Fuel Type Active 4500 1996 Painted Liquid Fuel Double Wall UST - Gasoline FST -4 BIG OTTER MARINA & 5 BRIDGE ST LOT 11 CON 1 January 2010 Retail Fuel Outlet FS MARINA CAMPGROUNDS PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 Status Capacity (L) Year of Installation Corrosion Protection Tank Fuel Type Active 2200 2005 Painted Liquid Fuel Double Wall AST - Gasoline FST -5 BIG OTTER MARINA & 5 BRIDGE ST LOT 11 CON 1 June 2010 Retail Fuel Outlet FS MARINA CAMPGROUNDS PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 Status Capacity (L) Year of Installation Corrosion Protection Tank Fuel Type Active 2200 2005 Painted Liquid Fuel Double Wall AST - Gasoline Page 1 of Fuel Storage Tank Page 23 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company FST -6 BIG OTTER MARINA & CAMPGROUNDS FST -7 BIG OTTER MARINA & CAMPGROUNDS Address 5 BRIDGE ST LOT 11 CON 1 PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 5 BRIDGE ST LOT 11 CON 1 PORT BURWELL Fuel Storage Tank License Tank Status Tank Status Operation Type Facility Type Issue Date As Of FS MARINA June 2011 Retail Fuel Outlet Status Capacity (L) Year of Installation Active 2200 2005 5/4/2005 Licensed December Retail Fuel Outlet 3:30:00 PM 2008 Status Capacity (L) Year of Installation Active 2270 1994 Active 2270 1994 FS MARINA Corrosion Protection Tank Fuel Type Painted Liquid Fuel Double Wall AST - Gasoline Marina Corrosion Protection Tank Fuel Type Liquid Fuel Single Wall AST - Gasoline Liquid Fuel Single Wall AST - Gasoline Page 2 of Fuel Storage Tank Page 24 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary Map Key Company Address SIC Code SIC Description Waste Code Waste Description GEN -1 Ministry of Natural Resources Port 9 Wilson Lane 331 Waste compressed gases Burwell Provincial Park Port Burwell including cylinders NOJ 1 T Generator#: ON5461765 Approval Yrs: As of Apr 2012 GEN -2 MINISTRY OF NATURAL 9 WILSON LANE 721198 All Other Traveller 331 WASTE COMPRESSED RESOURCES PORT BURWELL Accommodation GASES Generator #: ON8441477 Approval Yrs: 03,04,05,06 GEN -3 MINISTRY OF NATURAL PORT BURWELL PROVINCIAL 8272 RES. CONSAND. DEV. 112 ACID WASTE - HEAVY RESOURCES PARK METALS OFF HIGHWAY 19 Generator#: ON0124127 213 PETROLEUM DISTILLATES PORT BURWELL Approval Yrs: 98 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS 262 DETERGENTS/SOAPS 221 LIGHT FUELS GEN -4 Ministry of Natural Resources 9 Wilson Lane 712190 Other Heritage Institutions 331 WASTE COMPRESSED Port Burwell GASES Generator #: ON5461765 Approval Yrs: 2009 GEN -5 PORT BURWELL, CORP OF 24 PITT ST. 8371 TRANSPORTATION 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS VILLAGE OF 31-452 C/O 21 PITT ST. ADMIN PORT BURWELL NOJ 1 T Generator#: ON1066400 Approval Yrs: 92,93,94,95,96,97,98 GEN -6 PORT BURWELL, CORP OF 24 PITT ST. 8371 TRANSPORTATION 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS VILLAGE OF C/O 21 PITT ST. ADMIN PORT BURWELL NOJ 1 T Generator#: ON1066400 Approval Yrs: 88,89,90 GEN -7 CIBC 16 WELLINGTON STREET 221 LIGHT FUELS PORT BURWELL NOJ 1 T Generator#: ON3049416 Approval Yrs: 02,03,04 Page 1 of Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary Page 25 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company Address Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary SIC Code SIC Description Waste Code Waste Description n/a MINISTRY OF NATURAL PORT BURWELL PROV. PARK, 8272 RES. CONSAND. DEV. 112 ACID WASTE - HEAVY RESOURCES OFF HWY 19 METALS C/O P.O.BOX 9, PORT BURWELL Generator #: ON0124127 213 PETROLEUM DISTILLATES NOJ 1 T Approval Yrs: 86,87,88,89,90 221 LIGHT FUELS 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS 262 DETERGENTS/SOAPS n/a MINISTRY OF NATURAL PORT BURWELL PROV. PARK, 8272 RES. CONSAND. DEV. 112 ACID WASTE - HEAVY RESOURCES 27-218 OFF HWY 19 METALS C/O P.O.BOX 9, PORT BURWELL Generator #: ON0124127 213 PETROLEUM DISTILLATES NOJ 1 T Approval Yrs: 92,93,94,95,96,97 221 LIGHT FUELS 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS 262 DETERGENTS/SOAPS n/a MINISTRY OF THE PORT BURWELL WATER 4999 OTHER UTILITY IND. 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS ENVIRONMENT POLLUTION CNTRL.PLT. CHATHAM ST. AT LK. ERIE Generator #: ON0199838 SHORELINE C/O Approval Yrs: 86,87,88,89,90 BOX 40, PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 n/a MINISTRY OF THE PORT BURWELL WATER 4999 OTHER UTILITY IND. 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS ENVIRONMENT 27-226 POLLUTION CNTRL.PLT. CHATHAM ST. AT LK. ERIE Generator #: ON0199838 SHORELINE C/O Approval Yrs: 92,93,94,95,96,97 BOX 40, PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 n/a MINISTRY OF THE PORT BURWELL W.P.C.P. 4999 OTHER UTILITY IND. 252 WASTE OILS & LUBRICANTS ENVIRONMENT CHATHAM STREET AT LAKE ERIE SHORELINE Generator #: ON0199838 PORT BURWELL Approval Yrs: 98 NOJ 1T0 n/a SPORTSWOOD PRINTING 25 OLD PLANK ROAD 2841 NEWSPAPER, ETC. IND. 145 PAINT/PIGMENT/COATING BAYHAM TWP. RESIDUES NOJ 1YO Generator#: ON1292800 213 PETROLEUM DISTILLATES Approval Yrs: 92,93,97,98,99,00,01 264 PHOTOPROCESSING WASTES 265 GRAPHIC ART WASTES Page 2 of Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary Page 26 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company Address Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary SIC Code SIC Description Waste Code Waste Description n/a CANADIAN SPORTSMAN LTD., 25 OLD PLANK ROAD 2841 NEWSPAPER, ETC. IND. 145 PAINT/PIGMENT/COATING THE 08-638 STRAFFORDVILLE RESIDUES Generator#: ON1292800 213 PETROLEUM DISTILLATES Approval Yrs: 94,95,96 264 PHOTOPROCESSING WASTES Page 3 of Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Generators Summary Page 27 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company INC -1 Address TSSA Incidents Incident ID Incident Number SR Type Status Code 20 BROCK STREET, PORT 2414852 263492 BURWELL Summary: Drainage System: Sub Surface Contam.: Aff. Prop. Use Water: Contam. Migrated: Contact Natural Env.: Near Body of Water: Approx. Quant. Rel.: Equipment Model: Serial No: Residential App. Type: Commercial App. Type Industrial App. Type: Institutional App. Type: Venting Type: Vent Connector Mater.: Vent Chimney Mater.: Notes: Pipeline Type: Pipeline Involved: Pipe Material: Depth Ground Cover: Regulator Location: Regulator Type: Operation Pressure: Pipeline Notes: Liquid Prop Make: Liquid Prop Model: Liquid Prop Serial No: Equipment Type: Cylinder Capacity: Cylinder Capac. Units: Cylinder Material Type: Tank Capacity: Tank Material Type: Tank Storage Type: Tank Location Type: Pump Flow Rate Capac Liquid Prop Notes: FS -Incident Pending RC Validation 20 BROCK STREET, PORT BURWELL - EXPLOSION Page 1 of TSSA Incidents Page 28 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Federal Source Database Map Key Company Address National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) File No. Spill Date Lead Agency DOE on Scene Reported By n/a ONTARIO HYDRO BAYHAM TOWNSHIP 44622B 870914 Province Material Reaction: Basin: St. Lawrence River Drainage Air: Land: Y Fresh Water: Ground Water: Salt Water: Other Environment: Waterbody: Cause: Cooling System Leak Reason: Equipment Failure Source: Other Sector: Energy Generation Ship No.: Ship Name: Clean Up By: polluter Disposal Method: landfill Recovery %: 100.00 Act Invoked: None Enforcement Resp: Fish Kill: N Oiled Birds: N Other Kill: N Vegetation Damage: N Property Damage: N Drinking Water: N Income Loss: N Other Consequences: N No. of Injuries: No. of Evacuations: Fine: 0.00 No. of Dead: Cleanup Cost: 0.00 Material: oil pcb contaminated Amount (ton): 0.02 Volume (L): 13.00 Concentration: 200.006 Phase: Additional Info: Page 1 of National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) Page 29 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Non -Compliance Reports Page 1 of Non -Compliance Reports Page 30 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Map Key Company Address Year Discharge Type Sector Type of Concern n/a PORT BURWELL WPCP PORT BURWELL 2001 Wastewater Municipal Sewage C of A Contaminant: Escherichia coli Status Report: Incident Limit/Unit/ Quantity Min/Max Facility Action Ministry Action Date Freq none Assessment complete - no further action required n/a PORT BURWELL WPCP PORT BURWELL 2001 Wastewater Municipal Sewage C of A Contaminant: phosphorus Status Report: Incident Limit/Unit/ Quantity Min/Max Facility Action Ministry Action Date Freq new equipment installed Assessment complete - no further action required n/a Port Burwell WWTP Port Burwell 1999 Wastewater Municipal Non -Compliance Cert. of Approval Contaminant: Phosphorus Status Report: Incident Limit/Unit/ Quantity Min/Max Facility Action Ministry Action Date Freq Equipment modified Assessment complete - no further action required n/a Port Burwell WWTP Port Burwell 1999 Wastewater Municipal Non -Compliance Cert. of Approval Contaminant: Total Suspended Particulate Status Report: Incident Limit/Unit/ Quantity Min/Max Facility Action Ministry Action Date Freq Equipment modified Assessment complete - no further action required Page 1 of Non -Compliance Reports Page 30 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Federal Source Database Map Key Company Address National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES) Incident Date Contaminant n/a ONTARIO HYDRO BAYHAM TOWNSHIP 9/14/87 Amount: Units: Quantity: Cause: Source: Reason: Sector: Page 1 of National Environmental Emergencies System (NEES) Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. oil pcb contaminated 0.019 Tonnes (Metric) Cooling System Leak Other Equipment Failure Energy Generation Page 31 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database Ontario Oil and Gas Wells Map Key Company Address County Longitude Latitude Licence# Permit Date Depth(m) Depth Reached Capped Date OOGW-1 Dominion Natural Gas Co., Ltd. Bayham Elgin -80.80166667 42.64613889 F003814 426.7 3/26/1918 Well Name: Dominion No. 1155- L. Williams No. 1 Block: Lot: 12 Conc.: I Classification: NEW POOL WILDCAT Description: "EXPLORATORY WELL" MEANS A WELL THAT IS DRILLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCOVERING A POOL OF OIL OR GAS Status As Of: Feb 2012 Well Status Mode: Unknown Description: Well Status Type: Dry Hole Description: A WELL CLASSED AS EXPLORATORY OR DEVELOPMENT IN WHICH NO HYDROCARBONS HAVE BEEN ENCOUNTERED Target: SILURIAN Description: TARGETS WITHIN THE CLINTON AND CATARACT (OR MEDINA) GROUPS (WHIRLPOOL TO IRONDEQUOIT FORMATIONS INCLUSIVE) Geology/W Source Static Level Elevation / Top (m) Type of Water Geology Formation ter (M) Geology MNR n/a 103.83 / 83.8 n/a Dundee Geology MNR n/a 103.83 / 83.8 n/a Top of Bedrock Geology MNR n/a -230.57 / 418.2 n/a Irondequoit Geology MNR n/a -138.47 / 326.1 n/a Guelph Geology MNR n/a -236.07 / 423.7 n/a Grimsby Geology MNR n/a -216.27 / 403.9 n/a Rochester Geology MNR n/a -3.77 /191.4 n/a Bass Islands/Bertie Geology FORM 7 n/a 56.53/0 n/a Bois Blanc Geology FORM 7 n/a -138.47 / 326.1 n/a Guelph Geology FORM 7 n/a -230.57 / 418.2 n/a Irondequoit Geology FORM 7 n/a -216.27 / 403.9 n/a Rochester Geology FORM 7 n/a 187.62 / 0.01 n/a Drift Geology FORM 7 n/a 103.83 / 83.8 n/a Top of Bedrock Geology FORM 7 n/a -3.77 /191.4 n/a Bass Islands/Bertie Geology FORM 7 n/a 103.83 / 83.8 n/a Dundee Geology FORM 7 n/a -236.07 / 423.7 n/a Grimsby Page 1 of Ontario Oil and Gas Wells Page 32 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Pesticide Register Map Key Company Address Licence No. Licence Type PES -1 PORT BURWELL HOME 39 ROBINSON STREET Vendor HARDWARE HUNTLEY PORT BURWELL HARDWARE INC. NOJ 1T0 PES -2 786967 ONTARIO INC. O/A PORT 39 ROBINSON ST Vendor BURWELL HOME HARDWARE PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 PES -3 ALMOND INVESTMENTS INC 39 ROBINSON STREET Limited Vendor PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 n/a A.G. PASZTOR & SONS FARM R R 2, 215 REG RD 42 General Vendor SUPPLY LTD (V99071-03/2009) PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 n/a A.G. PASZTOR & SONS FARM R R 2, 215 REG RD 42 Vendor SUPPLY LTD (V99071-03/2009) PORT BURWELL NOJ1T0 Page 1 of Pesticide Register Page 33 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company n/a LEEDS TRANSIT SALES LTD Private and Retail Fuel Storage Tanks Address Location ID Type Expiry Date Capacity (L) Licence # LOT 13 CON 1 ELGIN 4417 retail 1994-10-31 1000 0032469001 Page 1 of Private and Retail Fuel Storage Tanks Page 34 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Private Source Database Map Key Company SCT -1 ARAMIS ENGRAVING & SIGNS LTD. Scott's Manufacturing Directory Address Established Plant Size Employment SIC/NAICS Description (ft') Code 34 ROBERTSON ST 1980 PORT BURWELL NOJ 1T0 3479 COATING, ENGRAVING AND ALLIED SERVICES, NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED 3993 SIGNS AND ADVERTISING SPECIALTIES Page 1 of Scott's Manufacturing Directory Page 35 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company Address SPL -1 The Corporation of the Municipality 1 Chatham Street of Bayham Bayham SPL -2 The Corporation of the Municipality 1 Chatham Street of Bayham Bayham Ontario Spills Ref No. Incident Dt MOE Reported Dt Contaminant Name Contaminant Quantity 6417- 5/23/2004 5/23/2004 SEWAGE,RAW 50 m3 5Z9UMU UNCHLORINATED Incident Summary: Port Burwell WWTP-50 M3 sewage to grnd. Incident Cause: Overflow (Tanks Lagoons) Incident Reason: Ice/Snow/Rain Nature of Impact: Soil Contamination Receiving Medium: Land Environmental Impact: Possible 3566- 4/25/2004 4/25/2004 DIGESTER SUPERNATE 500 L 5YDQNE foam Incident Summary: Port Burwell WPCP - Spill of digester foam to grnd Incident Cause: Other Discharges Incident Reason: Unknown - Reason not determined Nature of Impact: Soil Contamination Receiving Medium: Land Environmental Impact: Possible SPL -3 ONTARIO CLEAN WATER UNION ST AND BROCK ST PUMP 220891 1/31/2002 2/4/2002 AGENCY STATIONS PORT BURWELL WPCP Incident Summary: OCWA-PORT BURWELL BYPASS DUE TO POWER OUTAGE. BAYHAM MUNICIPALITY Incident Cause: START-UPS/SHUTDOWNS/INTERRUPTIONS Incident Reason: POWER INTERRUPTION Nature of Impact: Water course or lake Receiving Medium: WATER Environmental Impact: POSSIBLE SPL -4 ONTARIO HYDRO STRACHAN AVE & WATERLOO ST. 66557 1/29/1992 1/29/1992 MOTOR VEHICLE (OPERATING FLUID) Incident Summary: ONTARIO HYDRO -2 LITERS HYDRAULIC OIL TO GRND CONTAINED & CLEANED -UP. BAYHAM/PORT BURWELL/VIENNA Incident Cause: PIPE/HOSE LEAK TOWNSHIP Incident Reason: EQUIPMENT FAILURE Nature of Impact: Receiving Medium: LAND Environmental Impact: NOTANTICIPATED SPL -5 GRANGER FUELS LTD. AT RESIDENCE IN PORT 156223 5/29/1998 5/29/1998 BURWELL AT 41 ROBINSON ST. TANK TRUCK (CARGO) Incident Summary: GRANGER FUELS - 30 L OF FURNACE OIL TO GROUND DURING DELIVERY. BAYHAM/PORT BURWELL/VIENNA Incident Cause: ABOVE -GROUND TANK LEAK TOWNSHIP Incident Reason: ERROR Nature of Impact: Soil contamination Receiving Medium: LAND Environmental Impact: CONFIRMED Page 1 of Ontario Spills Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Page 36 of Detail Report Provincial Source Database Map Key Company Ontario Spills Address Ref No. Incident Dt MOE Reported Dt Contaminant Name Contaminant Quantity n/a PEMBINA EXPLORATION IN LAKE ERIE, S.W. OF PORT 114690 6/20/1995 6/20/1995 BURWELL. STATION. DRILLING RIG ***DO NOT USE Incident Summary: PEMBINA EXPLORATION: 1/2 L OF OIL TO LAKE ERIE FROM DRILLING RIG. THIS SITE*** Incident Cause: OTHER CONTAINER LEAK BAYHAM/PORT BURWELL/VIENNA Incident Reason: UNKNOWN TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP Incident Reason: Nature of Impact: Water course or lake Receiving Medium: WATER Environmental Impact: POSSIBLE n/a OTTER VALLEY TRUCKING COUNTY RDS. 28,42 & 45 & HWY 10869 10/24/1988 10/24/1988 73 FROM ST.THOMAS TO E. OF PORT BURWELL Incident Summary: OTTER VALLEY TRUCKING - UNKNOWN QTY TOMATO WASTE TO ROAD. TANK TRUCK (CARGO) Incident Cause: OTHER CONTAINER LEAK ELGIN COUNTY Incident Reason: NEGLIGENCE (APPARENT) Nature of Impact: Receiving Medium: LAND Environmental Impact: NOT ANTICIPATED n/a ONTARIO HYDRO LOT 12, CONC 1 MOEE PUMPING 94177 12/4/1993 12/5/1993 STATION. TRANSFORMER Incident Summary: ONTARIO HYDRO -10L MINERALOIL ONTO GROUND, TRANSF. LEAK DURING STORM.CLEANED BAYHAM/PORT BURWELL/VIENNA Incident Cause: COOLING SYSTEM LEAK TOWNSHIP Incident Reason: STORM/FLOOD/WIND Nature of Impact: Soil contamination Receiving Medium: LAND Environmental Impact: CONFIRMED n/a MINISTRY OF NATURAL AT THE PORT BURWELL 134349 11/18/1996 11/18/1996 RESOURCES PROVINCIAL PARK BAYHAM/PORT BURWELL/VIENNA Incident Summary: MNR-GASOLINE CONTAMINATEDSOIL AND WATER FROM UNDERGROUND TANK. TOWNSHIP Incident Cause: UNDERGROUND TANK LEAK Incident Reason: CORROSION Nature of Impact: Multi Media Pollution Receiving Medium: LAND / WATER Environmental Impact: CONFIRMED n/a DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL LAKE ERIE NEAR PORT BURWELL 204097 6/21/2001 6/22/2001 DEFENCE CFB IN TRENTON BAYHAM MUNICIPALITY Incident Summary: CFB TRENTON- 360 L OF JETFUEL TO LAKE ERIE FROM SNOWBIRD JET ACCIDENT. Incident Cause: AIRCRAFT CRASH Incident Reason: UNKNOWN Nature of Impact: Air Pollution Receiving Medium: Water Environmental Impact: Possible Page 2 of Ontario Spills Page 37 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Ontario Spills Map Key Company Address Ref No. Incident Dt MOE Reported Dt Contaminant Name Contaminant Quantity n/a LAKE ERIE, NEAR PORT 1582-6P47KR 4/19/2006 4/21/2006 NATURAL GAS (METHANE) 60 mcf/d BURWELL<UNOFFICIAL> Bayham Incident Summary: CCG: gas leak from 4" pipeline Incident Cause: Pipe Or Hose Leak Incident Reason: Nature of Impact: Surface Water Pollution Receiving Medium: Water Environmental Impact: Confirmed n/a Hydro One Networks Inc. 21 Strachan St, Port Bunnell 3887- 4/28/2011 4/28/2011 TRANSFORMER OIL (GT 0 other - see incident Bayham 8GCRV7 50 PPM PCB) description Incident Summary: Hydro One: 21 Strachan St, transformer to ground, contained Incident Cause: Incident Reason: Nature of Impact: Soil Contamination Receiving Medium: Environmental Impact: Confirmed Page 3 of Ontario Spills Page 38 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-1 2000624 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515663.7 Northing Nad83: 4720840 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/27/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 26 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): Elevation (m): 174.154632 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: Casing Material: Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 15 ft 15 ft FINE SAND 11 ft 26 ft BOULDERS Page 1 of Water Well Information System Page 39 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-2 2000625 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515578.7 Northing Nad83: 4720875 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/27/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 7 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): Elevation (m): 174.473266 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: 0 Overburden/Bedrock: Mixed in a Layer Water Type: Casing Material: Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 7 ft 7 ft FINE SAND, ROCK Page 2 of Water Well Information System Page 40 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-3 2000626 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515538.7 Northing Nad83: 4720902 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/27/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 15 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): Elevation (m): 174.606781 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: 0 Overburden/Bedrock: Mixed in a Layer Water Type: Casing Material: Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 15 ft 15 ft FINE SAND, ROCK Page 3 of Water Well Information System Page 41 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-4 2000627 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515513.7 Northing Nad83: 4720947 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/27/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 20 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): Elevation (m): 174.728729 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: Casing Material: Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 20 ft 20 ft FINE SAND, CLAY Page 4 of Water Well Information System Page 42 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-5 2003779 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515573.7 Northing Nad83: 4720982 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error : 30 m - 100 m Construction Date: 12/20/1984 Primary Water Use: Domestic Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 23 ft Pump Rate: 8 GPM Static Water Level: 4 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: CLEAR Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Water Supply Construction Method: Cable Tool Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 174.754959 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 4 ft 4 ft BROWN CLAY, SANDY 5 f 9 f GREY SAND 13ft 22ft GREY SAND 1ft 23 ft GREY CLAY Page 5 of Water Well Information System Page 43 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-6 2000619 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515413.7 Northing Nad83: 4721081 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/13/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 19 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): Elevation (m): 174.545211 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: Casing Material: Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 19 ft 19 ft FINE SAND, CLAY Page 6 of Water Well Information System Page 44 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company Address W W IS -7 Water Well Information System Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality 2000618 Easting Nad83: 515413.7 Northing Nad83: 4721202 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/11/1960 Primary Water Use: Not Used Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 17 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: 1 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 174.228988 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Depth 6 f 6 f 2 f 8 f 9 f 17ft ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Material MEDIUM SAND, SILT MEDIUM SAND, GRAVEL, SILT FINE SAND. CLAY Page 7 of Water Well Information System Page 45 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-8 2000623 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515813.7 Northing Nad83: 4721272 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/25/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 8 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): Elevation (m): 175.538696 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: Casing Material: Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 7 ft 7 ft MEDIUM SAND 1 f 8 f CLAY Page 8 of Water Well Information System Page 46 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-9 2000620 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515463.7 Northing Nad83: 4721272 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/17/1960 Primary Water Use: Not Used Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 14 ft Pump Rate: 42 GPM Static Water Level: 1 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: CLEAR Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Cable Tool Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 174.547851 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 6 ft 6 ft FINE SAND 8 f 14 ft GRAVEL, CLAY Page 9 of Water Well Information System Page 47 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-10 2000633 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515413.7 Northing Nad83: 4721297 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 6/14/1960 Primary Water Use: Not Used Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 13 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: 3 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 176.150497 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 6 ft 6 ft MEDIUM SAND 7 ft 13 ft GRAVEL, CLAY Page 10 of Water Well Information System Page 48 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-11 2000632 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515413.7 Northing Nad83: 4721297 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 6/13/1960 Primary Water Use: Not Used Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 13 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: 4 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 176.150497 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 6 ft 6 ft MEDIUM SAND 7 ft 13 ft GRAVEL, CLAY Page 11 of Water Well Information System Page 49 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-12 2000634 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515413.7 Northing Nad83: 4721297 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 6/14/1960 Primary Water Use: Not Used Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 13 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: 3 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 176.150497 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 6 ft 6 ft MEDIUM SAND 7 ft 13 ft GRAVEL, CLAY Page 12 of Water Well Information System Page 50 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-13 2000631 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515413.7 Northing Nad83: 4721297 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 6/7/1960 Primary Water Use: Not Used Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 13 ft Pump Rate: 20 GPM Static Water Level: 2 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 176.150497 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 6 ft 6 ft MEDIUM SAND 7 ft 13 ft GRAVEL, CLAY Page 13 of Water Well Information System Page 51 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Water Well Information System Map Key Company Address Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality WWIS-14 2000630 ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Easting Nad83: 515413.7 Northing Nad83: 4721297 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 6/1/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 14 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: 1 ft Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): N Elevation (m): 176.150497 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: Overburden/Bedrock: Overburden Water Type: FRESH Casing Material: STEEL Thickness Original Material Colour Material Depth 6 ft 6 ft MEDIUM SAND 8 ft 14 ft GRAVEL, CLAY Page 14 of Water Well Information System Page 52 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Provincial Source Database Map Key Company Address W W IS -15 Water Well Information System Well Id Lot Concession Concession Name County Municipality 2000615 Easting Nad83: 515638.7 Northing Nad83: 4721872 Zone: 17 Utm Reliability: margin of error: 100 m - 300 m Construction Date: 5/3/1960 Primary Water Use: Secondary Water Use: Well Depth: 212 ft Pump Rate: Static Water Level: Flow Rate: Clear/Cloudy: Specific Capacity: Final Well Status: Test Hole Construction Method: Rotary (Convent.) Flowing (y/n): Elevation (m): 187.832199 Elevation Reliability: Depth to Bedrock: 201 Overburden/Bedrock: Bedrock Water Type: Casing Material: Thickness Original Material Colour Depth 1 f 1 f 6 ft 7 ft BROWN 22 ft 29 ft 79 ft 108 ft GREY 81 ft 189 ft GREY 12 ft 201 ft GREY 11 ft 212 ft BLACK ELGIN PORT BURWELL VILLAGE Material TOPSOIL CLAY MEDIUM SAND, SILT CLAY, MEDIUM SAND CLAY, MEDIUM SAND CLAY, GRAVEL, MEDIUM SAND SHALE Page 15 of Water Well Information System Page 53 of Detail Report Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd. Appendix: Ontario Database Descriptions EcoLog Environmental Risk Information Services Ltd can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to EcoLog ERIS at the time of update. Note: Databases denoted with "*" indicates that the database will no longer be updated. See the individual database descriptions for more information. Provincial Government Source Databases: Abandoned Aggregate Inventory Up to Sept 2002 AAGR The MAAP Program maintains a database of all abandoned pits and quarries. Please note that the database is only referenced by lot and concession and city/town location. The database provides information regarding the location, type, size, land use, status and general comments. Aggregate Inventory Up to Jun 2011 AGR The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources maintains a database of all active pits and quarries. Please note that the database is only referenced by lot\concession and city/town location. The database provides information regarding the registered owner/operator, location, status, licence type, and maximum tonnage. Abandoned Mines Information System 1800 -Jan 2012 AMIS The Abandoned Mines Information System contains data on known abandoned and inactive mines located on both Crown and privately held lands. The information was provided by the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM), with the following disclaimer: "the database provided has been compiled from various sources, and the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines makes no representation and takes no responsibility that such information is accurate, current or complete". Reported information includes official mine name, status, background information, mine start/end date, primary commodity, mine features, hazards and remediation. Borehole 1875 -Aug 2011 BORE A borehole is the generalized term for any narrow shaft drilled in the ground, either vertically or horizontally. The information here includes geotechnical investigations or environmental site assessments, mineral exploration, or as a pilot hole for installing piers or underground utilities. Information is from many sources such as the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) boreholes from engineering reports and projects from the 1950 to 1990's in Southern Ontario. Boreholes from the Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) including The Urban Geology Analysis Information System (UGAIS) and the York Peel Durham Toronto (YPDT) database of the Conservation Authority Moraine Coalition. This database will include fields such as location, stratigraphy, depth, elevation, year drilled, etc. For all water well data or oil and gas well data for Ontario please refer to WWIS and OOGW. Certificates of Approval 1985 -Oct 30, 2011* CA This database contains the following types of approvals: Air & Noise, Industrial Sewage, Municipal & Private Sewage, Waste Management Systems and Renewable Energy Approvals. The MOE in Ontario states that any facility that releases emissions to the atmosphere, discharges contaminants to ground or surface water, provides potable water supplies, or stores, transports or disposes of waste, must have a Certificate of Approval before it can operate lawfully. Fields include approval number, business name, address, approval date, approval type and status. This database will no longer be updated, as CofA's have been replaced by either Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR) or Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA). Please refer to those individual databases for any information after Oct.31, 2011. TSSA Commercial Fuel Oil Tanks 1948 -Aug 2011 CFOT Since May 2002, Ontario developed a new act where it became mandatory for fuel oil tanks to be registered with Technical Standards & Safety Authority (TSSA). This data would include all commercial underground fuel oil tanks in Ontario with fields such as location, registration number, tank material, age of tank and tank size. Inventory of Coal Gasification Plants and Coal Tar Sites April 1987 and November 1988* COAL This inventory includes both the "Inventory of Coal Gasification Plant Waste Sites in Ontario -April 1987" and the "Inventory of Industrial Sites Producing or Using Coal Tar and Related Tars in Ontario -November 1988) collected by the MOE. It identifies industrial sites that produced and continue to produce or use coal tar and other related tars. Detailed information is available and includes: facility type, size, land use, information on adjoining properties, soil condition, site operators/occupants, site description, potential environmental impacts and historic maps available. This was a one-time inventory.* Compliance and Convictions 1989-2012 CONV This database summarizes the fines and convictions handed down by the Ontario courts beginning in 1989. Companies and individuals named here have been found guilty of environmental offenses in Ontario courts of law. Certificates of Property Use 1994-2012 CPU This is a subset taken from Ontario's Environmental Registry (EBR) database. It will include all CPU's on the registry such as (EPA s. 168.6) - Certificate of Property Use. Drill Holes 1886 -Oct 2011 DRL The Ontario Drill Hole Database contains information on more than 113,000 percussion, overburden, sonic and diamond drill holes from assessment files on record with the department of Mines and Minerals. Please note that limited data is available for southern Ontario, as it was the last area to be completed. The database was created when surveys submitted to the Ministry were converted in the Assessment File Research Image Database (AFRI) project. However, the degree of accuracy (coordinates) as to the exact location of drill holes is dependent upon the source document submitted to the MNDM. Levels of accuracy used to locate holes are: centering on the mining claim; a sketch of the mining claim; a 1:50,000 map; a detailed company map; or from submitted a "Report of Work". Environmental Activity and Sector Registry Oct 31, 2011-2012 EASR On October 31, 2011, a smarter, faster environmental approvals system came into effect in Ontario. The EASR allows businesses to register certain activities with the ministry, rather than apply for an approval. The registry is available for common systems and processes, to which preset rules of operation can be applied. The EASR is currently available for: heating systems, standby power systems and automotive refinishing. Businesses whose activities aren't subject to the EASR may apply for an ECA (Environmental Compliance Approval), Please see our ECA database. Environmental Reuistry 1994-2012 EBR The Environmental Registry lists proposals, decisions and exceptions regarding policies, Acts, instruments, or regulations that could significantly affect the environment. Through the Registry, thirteen provincial ministries notify the public of upcoming proposals and invite their comments. For example, if a local business is requesting a permit, license, or certificate of approval to release substances into the air or water; these are notified on the registry. Data includes: Approval for discharge into the natural environment other than water (i.e. Air) - EPA s. 9, Approval for sewage works - OWRA s. 53(1), and EPA s. 27 - Approval for a waste disposal site. For information regarding Permit to Take Water (PTTW), Certificate of Property Use (CPU) and (ORD) Orders please refer to those individual databases. -2- Environmental Compliance Approval Oct 31, 2011-2012 ECA On October 31, 2011, a smarter, faster environmental approvals system came into effect in Ontario. In the past, a business had to apply for multiple approvals (known as certificates of approval) for individual processes and pieces of equipment. Today, a business either registers itself, or applies for a single approval, depending on the types of activities it conducts. Businesses whose activities aren't subject to the EASR may apply for an ECA. A single ECA addresses all of a business's emissions, discharges and wastes. Separate approvals for air, noise and waste are no longer required. This database will also include Renewable Energy Approvals. For CofA's prior to Nov 1st, 2011, please refer to the CA database. For all Waste Disposal Sites please refer to the WDS database. List of TSSA Expired Facilities Current to Feb 2012 EXP This is a list of all expired facilities that fall under the TSSA (TSSA Act & Safety Regulations), including the six regulations that exist under the Fuels Safety Division. It will include facilities such as private fuel outlets, bulk plants, fuel oil tanks, gasoline stations, marinas, propane filling stations, liquid fuel tanks, piping systems, etc. These tanks have been removed and automatically fall under the expired facilities inventory held by TSSA. TSSA Fuel Storage Tanks Current to Jun 2011 FST The Technical Standards & Safety Authority (TSSA), under the Technical Standards & Safety Act of 2000 maintains a database of registered private and retail fuel storage tanks in Ontario with fields such as location, tank status, license date, tank type, tank capacity, fuel type, installation year and facility type. Ontario Reiulation 347 Waste Generators Summary 1986 -Apr 2012 GEN Regulation 347 of the Ontario EPA defines a waste generation site as any site, equipment and/or operation involved in the production, collection, handling and/or storage of regulated wastes. A generator of regulated waste is required to register the waste generation site and each waste produced, collected, handled, or stored at the site. This database contains the registration number, company name and address of registered generators including the types of hazardous wastes generated. It includes data on waste generating facilities such as: drycleaners, waste treatment and disposal facilities, machine shops, electric power distribution etc. This information is a summary of all years from 1986 including the most currently available data. Some records may contain, within the company name, the phrase "See & Use..." followed by a series of letters and numbers. This occurs when one company is amalgamated with or taken over by another registered company. The number listed as "See & Use", refers to the new ownership and the other identification number refers to the original ownership. This phrase serves as a link between the 2 companies until operations have been fully transferred. TSSA Historic Incidents 2006 -June 2009 HINC This database will cover all incidences recorded by TSSA with their older system, before they moved to their new management system. TSSA's Fuels Safety Program administers the Technical Standards & Safety Act 2000, providing fuel - related safety services associated with the safe transportation, storage, handling and use of fuels such as gasoline, diesel, propane, natural gas and hydrogen. Under this Act, TSSA regulates fuel suppliers, storage facilities, transport trucks, pipelines, contractors and equipment or appliances that use fuels. The TSSA works to protect the public, the environment and property from fuel -related hazards such as spills, fires and explosions. This database will include spills and leaks from pipelines, diesel, fuel oil, gasoline, natural gas, propane and hydrogen recorded by the TSSA. TSSA incidents June 2009 -Mar 2012 INC TSSA's Fuels Safety Program administers the Technical Standards & Safety Act 2000, providing fuel -related safety services associated with the safe transportation, storage, handling and use of fuels such as gasoline, diesel, propane, natural gas and hydrogen. Under this Act, TSSA regulates fuel suppliers, storage facilities, transport trucks, pipelines, contractors and equipment or appliances that use fuels. Includes incidents from fuel -related hazards such as spills, fires and explosions. This database will include spills and leaks from diesel, fuel oil, gasoline, natural gas, propane and hydrogen recorded by the TSSA. -3- Landfill Inventory Management Ontario 2010 LIMO The Landfill Inventory Management Ontario (LIMO) database is updated every year, as the ministry compiles new and updated information. The inventory will include small and large landfills. Additionally, each year the ministry will request operators of the larger landfills complete a landfill data collection form that will be used to update LIMO and will include the following information from the previous operating year. This will include additional information such as estimated amount of total waste received, landfill capacity, estimated total remaining landfill capacity, fill rates, engineering designs, reporting and monitoring details, size of location, service area, approved waste types, leachate of site treatment, contaminant attenuation zone and more. The small landfills will include information such as site owner, site location and certificate of approval # and status. Mineral Occurrences 1846 -Nov 2011 MNR In the early 70's, the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines created an inventory of approximately 19,000 mineral occurrences in Ontario, in regard to metallic and industrial minerals, as well as some information on building stones and aggregate deposits. Please note that the "Horizontal Positional Accuracy" is approximately +/- 200 in. Many reference elements for each record were derived from field sketches using pace or chain/tape measurements against claim posts or topographic features in the area. The primary limiting factor for the level of positional accuracy is the scale of the source material. The testing of horizontal accuracy of the source materials was accomplished by comparing the planimetric (X and Y) coordinates of that point with the coordinates of the same point as defined from a source of higher accuracy. Non -Compliance Reports 1992(water only), 1994-2010 NCPL The Ministry of the Environment provides information about non-compliant discharges of contaminants to air and water that exceed legal allowable limits, from regulated industrial and municipal facilities. A reported non-compliance failure may be in regard to a Control Order, Certificate of Approval, Sectoral Regulation or specific regulation/act. Ontario Oil and Gas Wells 1800 -Feb 2012 OOGW In 1998, the MNR handed over to the Ontario Oil, Gas and Salt Resources Corporation, the responsibility of maintaining a database of oil and gas wells drilled in Ontario. The OGSR Library has over 20,000+ wells in their database. Information available for all wells in the ERIS database include well owner/operator, location, permit issue date, well cap date, licence no., status, depth and the primary target (rock unit) of the well being drilled. All geology/stratigraphy table information, plus all water table information is also provide for each well record. Ontario Inventory of PCB Storage Sites 1987 -Oct 2004 OPCB The Ontario Ministry of Environment, Waste Management Branch, maintains an inventory of PCB storage sites within the province. Ontario Regulation 11/82 (Waste Management - PCB) and Regulation 347 (Generator Waste Management) under the Ontario EPA requires the registration of inactive PCB storage equipment and/or disposal sites of PCB waste with the Ontario Ministry of Environment. This database contains information on: 1) waste quantities; 2) major and minor sites storing liquid or solid waste; and 3) a waste storage inventory. Orders 1994-2012 ORD This is a subset taken from Ontario's Environmental Registry (EBR) database. It will include all Orders on the registry such as (EPA s. 17) - Order for remedial work, (EPA s. 18) - Order for preventative measures, (EPA s. 43) - Order for removal of waste and restoration of site, (EPA s. 44) - Order for conformity with Act for waste disposal sites, (EPA s. 136) - Order for performance of environmental measures. Pesticide Register 1988 -Mar 2011 PES The Ontario Ministry of Environment maintains a database of all manufacturers and vendors of registered pesticides. -4- TSSA Pipeline Incidents June 2009 -Mar 2012 PINC TSSA's Fuels Safety Program administers the Technical Standards & Safety Act 2000, providing fuel -related safety services associated with the safe transportation, storage, handling and use of fuels such as gasoline, diesel, propane, natural gas and hydrogen. Under this Act, TSSA regulates fuel suppliers, storage facilities, transport trucks, pipelines, contractors and equipment or appliances that use fuels. This database will include spills, strike and leaks from recorded by the TSSA. Private and Retail Fuel Storage Tanks 1989-1996* PRT The Fuels Safety Branch of the Ontario Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations maintained a database of all registered private fuel storage tanks and licensed retail fuel outlets. This database includes an inventory of locations that have gasoline, oil, waste oil, natural gas and/or propane storage tanks on their property. The MCCR no longer collects this information. This information is now collected by the Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA). Permit to Take Water 1994-2012 PTTW This is a subset taken from Ontario's Environmental Registry (EBR) database. It will include all PTTW's on the registry such as OWRA s. 34 - Permit to take water. Ontario Regulation 347 Waste Receivers Summary 1986-2009 REC Part V of the Ontario Environmental Protection Act ("EPA") regulates the disposal of regulated waste through an operating waste management system or a waste disposal site operated or used pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Certificate of Approval or a Provisional Certificate of Approval. Regulation 347 of the Ontario EPA defines a waste receiving site as any site or facility to which waste is transferred by a waste carrier. A receiver of regulated waste is required to register the waste receiving facility. This database represents registered receivers of regulated wastes, identified by registration number, company name and address, and includes receivers of waste such as: landfills, incinerators, transfer stations, PCB storage sites, sludge farms and water pollution control plants. This information is a summary of all years from 1986 including the most currently available data. Record of Site Condition 1997 -Sept 2001, Oct 2004-2012 RSC The Record of Site Condition (RSC) is part of the Ministry of the Environment's Brownfields Environmental Site Registry. Protection from environmental cleanup orders for property owners is contingent upon documentation known as a record of site condition (RSC) being filed in the Environmental Site Registry. In order to file an RSC, the property must have been properly assessed and shown to meet the soil, sediment and groundwater standards appropriate for the use (such as residential) proposed to take place on the property. The Record of Site Condition Regulation (O. Reg. 153/04) details requirements related to site assessment and clean up. RSCS filed after July 1, 2011 will also be included as part of the new (O.Reg. 511/09). Ontario Spills 1988-2011 SPL This database identifies information such as location (approximate), type and quantity of contaminant, date of spill, environmental impact, cause, nature of impact, etc. Information from 1988-2002 was part of the ORIS (Occurrence Reporting Information System). The SAC (Spills Action Centre) handles all spills reported in Ontario. Regulations for spills in Ontario are part of the MOE's Environmental Protection Act, Part X. Wastewater Discharger Registration Database 1990-2011 SRDS Information under this heading is combination of the following 2 programs. The Municipal/Industrial Strategy for Abatement (MISA) division of the Ontario Ministry of Environment maintained a database of all direct dischargers of toxic pollutants within nine sectors including: Electric Power Generation; Mining; Petroleum Refining; Organic Chemicals; Inorganic Chemicals; Pulp & Paper; Metal Casting; Iron & Steel; and Quarries. All sampling information is now collected and stored within the Sample Result Data Store (SRDS). -5- TSSA Variances for Abandonment of Undereround StoraLFe Tanks Current to October 2011 VAR The TSSA, Under the Liquid Fuels Handling Code and the Fuel Oil Code, all underground storage tanks must be removed within two years of disuse. If removal of a tank is not feasible, you may apply to seek a variance from this code requirement. This is a list of all variances granted for abandoned tanks. Waste Disposal Sites - MOE CA Inventory 1970-2012 WDS The Ontario Ministry of Environment, Waste Management Branch, maintains an inventory of known open (active or inactive) and closed disposal sites in the Province of Ontario. Active sites maintain a Certificate of Approval, are approved to receive and are receiving waste. Inactive sites maintain Certificate(s) of Approval but are not receiving waste. Closed sites are not receiving waste. The data contained within this database was compiled from the MOE's Certificate of Approval database. Locations of these sites may be cross-referenced to the Anderson database described under ERIS's Private Source Database section, by the CA number. All new Environmental Compliance Approvals handed out after Oct 31, 2011 for Waste Disposal Sites will still be found in this database. Waste Disposal Sites - MOE 1991 Historical Approval Inventory Up to Oct 1990* WDSH In June 1991, the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Waste Management Branch, published the "June 1991 Waste Disposal Site Inventory", of all known active and closed waste disposal sites as of October 30st, 1990. For each "active" site as of October 31 st 1990, information is provided on site location, site/CA number, waste type, site status and site classification. For each "closed" site as of October 31st 1990, information is provided on site location, site/CA number, closure date and site classification. Locations of these sites may be cross-referenced to the Anderson database described under ERIS's Private Source Database section, by the CA number. Water Well Information System 1955-2011 WWIS This database describes locations and characteristics of water wells found within Ontario in accordance with Regulation 903. It includes such information as coordinates, construction date, well depth, primary and secondary use, pump rate, static water level, well status, etc. Also included are detailed stratigraphy information, approximate depth to bedrock and the approximate depth to the water table. Federal Government Source Databases: Diagram Identifier: Environmental Effects Monitorine 1992-2007* EEM The Environmental Effects Monitoring program assesses the effects of effluent from industrial or other sources on fish, fish habitat and human usage of fisheries resources. Since 1992, pulp and paper mills have been required to conduct EEM studies under the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations. This database provides information on the mill name, geographical location and sub -lethal toxicity data. Environmental Issues Inventory System 1992-2001* EIIS The Environmental Issues Inventory System was developed through the implementation of the Environmental Issues and Remediation Plan. This plan was established to determine the location and severity of contaminated sites on inhabited First Nation reserves, and where necessary, to remediate those that posed a risk to health and safety; and to prevent future environmental problems. The MIS provides information on the reserve under investigation, inventory number, name of site, environmental issue, site action (Remediation, Site Assessment), and date investigation completed. Federal Convictions 1988 -Jun 2007 FCON Environment Canada maintains a database referred to as the "Environmental Registry" that details prosecutions under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) and the Fisheries Act (FA). Information is provided on the company name, location, charge date, offence and penalty. -6- Contaminated Sites on Federal Land June 2000 -Sept 2012 FCS The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat maintains an inventory of all known contaminated sites held by various Federal departments and agencies. This inventory does not include properties owned by Crown corporations, but does contain non- federal sites for which the Government of Canada has accepted some or all financial responsibility. All sites have been classified through a system developed by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. The database provides information on company name, location, site ID #, property use, classification, current status, contaminant type and plan of action for site remediation. Fisheries & Oceans Fuel Tanks 1964 -Sept 2003 FOFT Fisheries & Oceans Canada maintains an inventory of all aboveground & underground fuel storage tanks located on Fisheries & Oceans property or controlled by DFO. Our inventory provides information on the site name, location, tank owner, tank operator, facility type, storage tank location, tank contents & capacity, and date of tank installation. Indian & Northern Affairs Fuel Tanks 1950 -Aug 2003 IAFT The Department of Indian & Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) maintains an inventory of all aboveground & underground fuel storage tanks located on both federal and crown land. Our inventory provides information on the reserve name, location, facility type, site/facility name, tank type, material & ID number, tank contents & capacity, and date of tank installation. National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) 1974-1994* NATE In 1974 Environment Canada established the National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System (NATES) database, for the voluntary reporting of significant spill incidents. The data was to be used to assist in directing the work of the emergencies program. NATES ran from 1974 to 1994. Extensive information is available within this database including company names, place where the spill occurred, date of spill, cause, reason and source of spill, damage incurred, and amount, concentration, and volume of materials released. National Defence & Canadian Forces Fuel Tanks Up to May 2001* NDFT The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of all aboveground & underground fuel storage tanks located on DND lands. Our inventory provides information on the base name, location, tank type & capacity, tank contents, tank class, date of tank installation, date tank last used, and status of tank as of May 2001. This database will no longer be updated due to the new National Security protocols which have prohibited any release of this database. National Defence & Canadian Forces Spills Mar 1999 -Aug 2010 NDSP The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of spills to land and water. All spill sites have been classified under the "Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act - 1992". Our inventory provides information on the facility name, location, spill ID #, spill date, type of spill, as well as the quantity of substance spilled & recovered. National Defence & Canadian Forces Waste Disposal Sites 2001 -April 2007 NDWD The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces maintains an inventory of waste disposal sites located on DND lands. Where available, our inventory provides information on the base name, location, type of waste received, area of site, depth of site, year site opened/closed and status. -7- National Environmental Emereencies Svstem (NEES) 1974-2003 NEES In 2000, the Emergencies program implemented NEES, a reporting system for spills of hazardous substances. For the most part, this system only captured data from the Atlantic Provinces, some from Quebec and Ontario and a portion from British Columbia. Data for Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and the Territories was not captured. However, NEES is also a repository for all previous Environment Canada spill datasets. NEES is composed of the historic datasets — or Trends — which dates from approximately 1974 to present. NEES Trends is a compilation of historic databases, which were merged and includes data from NATES (National Analysis of Trends in Emergencies System), ARTS (Atlantic Regional Trends System), and NEES. In 2001, the Emergencies Program determined that variations in reporting regimes and requirements between federal and provincial agencies made national spill reporting and trend analysis difficult to achieve. As a consequence, the department has focused efforts on capturing data on spills of substances which fall under its legislative authority only (CEPA and FA). As such, the NEES database will be decommissioned in December 2004. National PCB Inventory 1988-2008 NPCB Environment Canada's National PCB inventory includes information on in -use PCB containing equipment in Canada including federal, provincial and private facilities. All federal out -of -service PCB containing equipment and all PCB waste owned by the federal government or by federally regulated industries such as airlines, railway companies, broadcasting companies, telephone and telecommunications companies, pipeline companies, etc. are also listed. Although it is not Environment Canada's mandate to collect data on non-federal PCB waste, the National PCB inventory includes some information on provincial and private PCB waste and storage sites. National Pollutant Release Inventory 1993-2010 NPRI Environment Canada has defined the National Pollutant Release Inventory ("NPRI") as a federal government initiative designed to collect comprehensive national data regarding releases to air, water, or land, and waste transfers for recycling for more than 300 listed substances. Parks Canada Fuel Storage Tanks 1920 -Jan 2005 PCFT Canadian Heritage maintains an inventory of all known fuel storage tanks operated by Parks Canada, in both National Parks and at National Historic Sites. The database details information on site name, location, tank install/removal date, capacity, fuel type, facility type, tank design and owner/operator. Transport Canada Fuel Storage Tanks 1970 -March 2007 TCFT With the provinces of BC, MB, NB, NF, ON, PE, and QC; Transport Canada currently owns and operates 90 fuel storage tanks. This inventory will also include The Pickering Lands, which refers to the 7,530 hectares (18,600 acres) of land in Pickering, Markham and Uxbridge - owned by the Government of Canada since 1972. Properties on this land has been leased by the government since 1975, falls under the Site Management Policy of Transport Canada, but administered by Public Works and Government Services Canada. Our inventory provides information on the site name, location, tank age, capacity and fuel type. Private Source Databases: Anderson's Waste Disposal Sites 1860s -Present ANDR The information provided in this database was collected by examining various historical documents which aimed to characterize the likely position of former waste disposal sites from 1860 to present. The research initiative behind the creation of this database was to identify those sites that are missing from the Ontario MOE Waste Disposal Site Inventory, as well as to provide revisions and corrections to the positions and descriptions of sites currently listed in the MOE inventory. In addition to historic waste disposal facilities, the database also identifies certain auto wreckers and scrap yards that have been extrapolated from documentary sources. Please note that the data is not warranted to be complete, exhaustive or authoritive. The information was collected for research purposes only. -8- Automobile Wrecking & Sunnlies 2001 -Jun 2010 AUWR This database provides an inventory of all known locations that are involved in the scrap metal, automobile wrecking/recycling, and automobile parts & supplies industry. Information is provided on the company name, location and business type. Chemical Resister 1992, 1999 -Jun 2010 CHEM This database includes information from both a one time study conducted in 1992 and private source and is a listing of facilities that manufacture or distribute chemicals. The production of these chemical substances may involve one or more chemical reactions and/or chemical separation processes (i.e. fractionation, solvent extraction, crystallization, etc.). ERIS Historical Searches 1999 -Oct 2012 EHS EcoLog ERIS has compiled a database of all environmental risk reports completed since March 1999. Available fields for this database include: site location, date of report, type of report, and search radius. As per all other databases, the ERIS database can be referenced on both the map and "Statistical Profile" page. Canadian Mine Locations 1998-2009 MINE This information is collected from the Canadian & American Mines Handbook. The Mines database is a national database that provides over 290 listings on mines (listed as public companies) dealing primarily with precious metals and hard rocks. Listed are mines that are currently in operation, closed, suspended, or are still being developed (advanced projects). Their locations are provided as geographic coordinates (x, y and/or longitude, latitude). As of 2002, data pertaining to Canadian smelters and refineries has been appended to this database. Oil and Gas Wells Oct 2001-2012 OGW The Nickle's Energy Group (publisher of the Daily Oil Bulletin) collects information on drilling activity including operator and well statistics. The well information database includes name, location, class, status and depth. The main Nickles' database is updated on a daily basis, however, this database is updated on a monthly basis. More information is available at www.nickles.com. Canadian Pulp and Paper 1999, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2009 PAP This information is part of the Pulp and Paper Canada Directory. The Directory provides a comprehensive listing of the locations of pulp and paper mills and the products that they produce. Retail Fuel Storage Tanks 2000 -Jun 2010 RST This database includes an inventory of retail fuel outlet locations (including marinas) that have on their property gasoline, oil, waste oil, natural gas and / or propane storage tanks. Information is provided on company name, location and type of business. Scott's Manufacturing Directory 1992 -Mar 2011 SCT Scott's Directories is a data bank containing information on over 70,000 manufacturers in Ontario. Even though Scott's listings are voluntary, it is the most comprehensive database of Ontario manufacturers available. Information concerning a company's address, plant size, and main products are included in this database. This database begins with 1992 information and is updated annually. Anderson's Storage Tanks 1915-1953* TANK The information provided in this database was collected by examining various historical documents, which identified the location of former storage tanks, containing substances such as fuel, water, gas, oil, and other various types of miscellaneous products. Information is available in regard to business operating at tank site, tank location, permit year, permit & installation type, no. of tanks installed & configuration and tank capacity. Data contained within this database pertains only to the city of Toronto and is not warranted to be complete, exhaustive or authoritative. The information was collected for research purposes only. -9- APPENDIX XI GOVERNMENT, REGULATORY, AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION $4 A tQ A - Cl C �' . �.�' _ -,w �a. .ems �. ��. . •ew .--.z-�� G (:. I 0 0 1111er12012 le : 33 Els—e73—e 933 to Watilea Mlnis[8re the of de Elr vlronment fF_r vironnem0nt �IrdF airs TapraKlax anviromental 0C S 179--0321-6791 P•ROPfiA 3D WNRP ANTI LQCIAMION 1-011DON DIST OFFICIa It 1313N Ft9V1EV1 FIVPOiiil CCIr, ME RCl1ALlIN17u £ TRIALlAC. RIICIL L -M RAL 'Your Flilcl: C18664-4❑ r1atcl Fielaeivelc : 00 4.1 a pu sent. O,vne■: Public Works and GOVCnIn ani Scavtcca Qanada Past Cwncas: I_,ocettion; Pon r3urmloll 9lmetl CnntL harbour, Pun Iduuwall, t]ntanio LN-7)F7C (}]: N114 , q9 FOR O P41GE1 01/ 1711 We hi va searched the District Index Fin Cold al Active O■dars undor the F.nvinnnmentnt Protection Act II13PA' , oil tal io Watca Re. all11Cea It el (Clvl RAi t lid the Flea tieidcs Act. IPA' . nd the ilollolviug inilorr»aijaIt has bccn ff)IM& V ( I ... k her■ A there Alia no Aetire Ordart OnIq! a.l ding pal. otl Scaaoht Novernhgr 11 . 2012 We llavd ticquct ted a scatcll Of the index Raaosd OPnames 011 all palsolrs to wllorrl eippravals have been iii sued, maint.ind d by the Dirac'lor, Approvals i3aanch and tha Regional Dirt alor, Sell hwastcrr Rection nnd'hc Landau District Of ice, ander St aiian 19llPF .1141 Scetion 13 Ow RA and the fa 1loviing infanmai inn has bc.l pllovidcdt la Ntt�l ,Section 9 R'.PA '..,-jinn 19 777,11 Scetion .52 QWRPI Section 93 ❑INMA Other r Gna tk hemi. it thane have) Bean no Approvals issucld tCl-da o. Date oil Seallch; 1` av(Imbcs 13, 2413 PICAsa- Not.: 1) Tha iornrmulion providleal ahnv. is t c sed iolq ly on ti (' elernt*(a) of tl d lltesem and Lastolomel: pwilidec by 1,011. 2) The Index Rlcco,d oil Nemas 110 wile m appsovnl: have bean it suedl, nla.irrtf inad by the Rcgimlal Disa a loa and sh-iat Tianager, has been scmichcd back to 1993. ]' 'nhc Index Ractotd I INamas to whom appuavals hava been issued, mainlainad by the Diiector of9nviranmental 0lgsmss111cotnnd Allt .ovals, hag been saarct ad I ach to 1916. 4' If no inspection lit the Oiidu.: nnd.lor Applovals idcntifiad is squired please contnct this Office, 5' AI(AtlCljoil OU1 raaaad.SlamNOT indianlewhethe.th,`resea: -o'l hes m cs for v hint a tl a tl jl noval may have bean aequircd, nor -.ilrcr u.cs on the p—M., y .. in III. vicinity that. may fl?feat Ih. sural itity of tli. propcM , Iloa the use pimpo; ed to ba. ma ck of it. 111 a compel aneivc knowledgc of the pnopert3 and the nesaby Innds and it a is ne visnnmantat condition is aequtaad, you must examina Them atld other talavarll actiamle youasallL with II e c i, all a qualified parson, if needed. 6. 1laflsc advlse yettl V011-1111-1 drat responses to requcmx for saalsahes alwflils tt lie a nm a Lima. As a rennlil MOP. imfly nol bd i ble to meel danclli.aab imposed by tither partial on real a:etata And otl r t.ransaerlons. Oonlact Nnmc; John McGlynn Titict.Fnvlr•nnmenleaA Q( j•, Ce'n Signaf111C Addna— 733 Enat.a lid. Lonaion, r,T N Da h•: Na va nl baa i 3, 20 13 phony 519.111-5023 Ministry of the Environment Aeedorn of Information and e=::= Protection of Privacy Office 12" Floor 40 St. Clair Avenue West Toronto ON M4V 1 M2 Tel.: (416) 314-4075 Fax: (416) 314-4285 Siratha Chhan Terrapex Environmental Ltd 16 — 920 brant St Burlington, ON L7R 4J1 Minist®re de 1=Environnement Bureau de I=acces 6 1=information et de la protection de la vie priv6e 12' etage 401, avenue St. Clair ouest Toronto ON M4V 1M2 Tel.: (416) 314.4075 T6I6c.: (416) 314.4285 RE: Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act Request Your Reference #(s) CB664.00 - Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Ontario Oct 29, 20112 Thank you for your request for access to records under the 'Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Based on the information provided, we are unable to ,process your request at this time and are returning your application. If you wish to resubmit please include the following details missing from your current request: 1. Municipal address! Lot and Concession - If the property is located within a municipality, it is absolutely essentiat +1 that you provide us with the municipal address. If no municipal address exists then you must provide the lot and concession information. If in doubt on the type of information you should provide us with, please contact us, otherwise you risk possible time delays due to clarification. (Provide any historical address information —only it it is in the form of either a municipal address or lot and concession) NOTE: The Ministry of the Environment does not file records by Pin, Block, or Registered Plan numbers and cannot accept intersections or descriptions in relation to other properties as valid search parameters. One site per request — you may only submit multiple addresses if the properties are considered one site and are adjacent to each other without crossing a street and have the same current owner. __. If no Municipal Address or Lot and Concession Information exists for this site —the Ministry would only be able to send your request to the District and Regional Offices we would require a more comprehensive map outlining crossing streets, long and lat coordinates etc.. Please contact me Liz Mica if this is the case. The Ministry would require a map forwarded by email which would be clearer my email address is liz.mico@ontario.ca. When remitting your request please send to: Ministry of the Environment Freedom of information and Protection of Privacy Office 40 St. Glair Avenue West, 12th Floor Toronto, Ontario M4V 1 M2 Fax: 416.3144285 It you have any questions regarding the above mentioned requirements do not hesitate to contact Liz Mico at (416) 212- 0�59i. Please find your original incomplete request enclosed. Yours truly, FOI Office Clerk Information Management and 0761 DEA (05102) Encl. From: Walker, Korey (MNR) To: Siratha Chhan Cc: McCloskey, Amanda (MNR) Subject: Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Date: October 9, 2012 2:54:58 PM Hi Siratha Thank you for your email regarding the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, in Port Burwell, Ontario. We ask that consultants visit the Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) Biodiversity Explorer and Land Information Ontario to gather natural heritage information on the site prior to submitting a request through MNR. In your submission to the district, please show us the information obtained from NHIC and LIO and we will provide any additional information we may have at the district. NHIC compiles, maintains and distributes information on species at risk, natural species, plant communities and spaces of conservation concern in Ontario. This information is stored in a spatial database used for tracking this information and can be located: http://nhic.mnr.gov.on.ca/nhic_.cfm This is a web -based GIS map function, that you can use to zoom in on the subject lands and download recorded information. NHIC is not complete, as data always exists outside of databases, but it gives an idea of where to start. LIO manages geographic information for use in maps and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). LIO has a web -accessible data warehouse that contains more than 250 different layers of geographic data. The data ranges from the location of underground wells to satellite imagery. LIO can be reached at (705) 755-1878. You can also access the general user version online at: http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/LIO/index.html In your submission to the district please also provide a description of the project activities and a description of the location (e.g. lot and concession and/ or municipal address) as well as a map. If possible please provide the anticipated timing and duration of the project activities to occur and describe what planning process you are in (e.g. is the information being collected as part of a municipal planning requirement or environmental assessment). Also just for clarification if the information request is a general natural heritage request or is SAR specific but relating to a planning file please send the information request directly to me or Amanda McCloskey. If the request is SAR specific please use the ESAScreeningRequest.AylmerDistrict@ontario.ca. Due to the high volume of requests we receive, please note that MNR responses may take 6-8 weeks after receipt of all required information. It is highly recommended that proposed projects and requests for information be submitted to MNR as early as possible before the schedule commencement date. If you have any questions regarding the information provided above please let me know. -Korey Walker Planning Intern Ministry of Natural Resources Aylmer, ON N5H 258 T: 519-773-4737 From: squibell@tssa.org on behalf of Public Information Services To: Siratha Chhan Subject: Re: C13664.00 - request for information - TSSA [REF:15632419651] Date: October 5, 2012 2:16:42 PM Hi Siratha, In order to avoid any delays, in the future please direct all your information requests to 'publicinformationservices@tssa.org'. Thank you for your inquiry. We have no record in our database of any fuel storage tanks at the subject address (addresses). For a further search in our archives please submit your request in writing to Public Information Services via e-mail (publicinformationservices@tssa.org) or through mail along with a fee of $56.50 (including HST) per location. The fee is payable with credit card (Visa or MasterCard) or with a Cheque made payable to TSSA. Although TSSA believes the information provided pursuant to your request is accurate, please note that TSSA does not warrant this information in any way whatsoever. Thank you and have a great day! Regards, Sarah Sarah Quibell Public Information Services TECHNICAL STANDARDS & SAFETY AUTHORITY "Putting Public Safety First" 14th Floor, Centre Tower 3300 Bloor Street West Toronto, ON M8X 2X4 www.tssa.org Toll -Free: 1-877-682-8772 On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, TSSA Customer Service <pectscs@atoracle.com> wrote: Hi. Please assist customer with request. Thank you. Joey. REPLY TO: S.Chhan@terrapex.com ---- Original Message ---- Technical Standards and Safety Authority Fuels Safety Division 3300 Bloor St. West 14th Floor, Centre Tower Toronto, Ontario M8X 2X4 Attention: Mr. Prem Lal. Re: Request for Files Search Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Terrapex Environmental Ltd. has been authorized by the Public Works and Government Services Canada to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property known as Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Port Burwell, Ontario (hereafter known as "the site"). A Site location plan is attached. The area within the dotted line is the area of interest in this Phase I ESA. Terrapex is requesting any information on -file pertaining to the property located at this address. Terrapex is requesting any information on -file pertaining to the property located at this address. Please contact me at 905-632-5939 ext. 263 or my cell at (416) 209-9562 regarding payment for your services. Thank you in advance for your time and attention to this matter. If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. Siratha Chhan, Dipl., Ept. Environmental Technologist Siratha Chhan, Dipl., EPt. Environmental Technologist [http://www.terrapex.com/environmentalengineering/ Terrapex_logo.gif] Tel: 905-632-5939 x263 Fax: 905-632-6793 Cell: 416-209-9562 Email: S.Chhan@terrapex.com 920 Brant Street, Unit 16 Burlington, Ontario L7R 4J1 This message, including any attachments, is confidential, may contain privileged information, and is intended solely for the addressee. Any distribution, use or copying of this email or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized and prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please advise the sender immediately and permanently delete this message and attachments. Thank you for your attention and cooperation This electronic message and any attached documents are intended only for the named recipients. This communication from the Technical Standards and Safety Authority may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and it must not be disclosed, copied, forwarded or distributed without authorization. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original message. This electronic message and any attached documents are intended only for the named recipients. This communication from the Technical Standards and Safety Authority may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and it must not be disclosed, copied, forwarded or distributed without authorization. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original message APPENDIX XII WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK APPENDIX XII - 1 WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK SUMMARY Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Category Species (Common Name) Federal Status s MNR Status COSEWIC' SARA' Schedule Bird Acadian Flycatcher Endangered Endangered 1 Endangered Cerulean Warbler Endangered Special Concern 1 Special Concern Louisiana Waterthrush Special Concern Special Concern 1 Special Concern Hooded Warbler Threatened Threatened 1 Special Concern Yellow -breasted Chat Endangered Special Concern 1 Special Concern Fish Brindled Madtom - - - - Eastern Sand Darter Threatened - - Threatened Mammal American Badger Endangered Endangered 1 Endangered Woodland Vole Special Concern Special Concern 1 Special Concern Reptile, Amphibian Jefferson Salamander Endangered Threatened 1 Threatened Fowler's Toad Endangered Endangered 1 Threatened Blanding's Turtle Threatened Threatened 1 Threatened Milksnake Special Concern Special Concern 1 Special Concern Gray Ratsnake (Carolinian population) Threatened Threatened 1 Endangered Eastern Ribbonsnake Special Concern Special Concern 1 Massasauga Endangered Threatened Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada Species at Risk Act (S. C. 2002, c. 29) Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources * Note: Biodiversity Explorer database did not always match SARA Database for COSEWIC classification. Where a conflict was found, the SARA database COSEWIC classification was used in this table. (Cerulean Warbler, Yellow Breasted Chat, Gray's Ratsnake, Massasauga) PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 1 of 1 Entered by: RA Reviewed by. GLL APPENDIX XII - 2 WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Common/Scientific Name SARA' SARO Preferred Habitat Occurrence Habitat Potential at/near APEC Threats Birds Acadian Flycatcher END END - Large areas of mature undisturbed forest Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 -forest fragmentation Empidonax virescens -well-wooded swamps and ravines consists of open areas mixed with long -residential and agricultural -prefer to hang nests over water grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring development treed areas along the APEC 1 western boundary and aquatic envriornments with variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Cerulean Warbler SC SC - deciduous forests that may be in wet bottomland Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - fragmentation and habitat loss on the Dendroica cerulea areas or on dry ridges in upland locations consists of open areas mixed with long breeding and wintering grounds grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring - decline in insect populations due to treed areas along the APEC 1 western insecticide spraying boundary and aquatic envriornments with -acid rain variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Lousiana Waterthrush SC SC - mature forest along steeply sloped ravines adjacent Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - forest fragmentation Selurus motacilla to running water, cold streams and densely wooded consists of open areas mixed with long -fluctuating water levels swamps, tree, bushes, cliffs, banks and mossy logs grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring -water pollution and siltation -riparian woodlands are preferred migration stopover treed areas along the APEC 1 western -brood parasitsm by Brown -headed locations boundary and aquatic envriornments with Cowbirds variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Hooded Warbler TH SC - nests in mature hardwood forests, small clearings Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - forest fragmentation Wilsonia citrina with low dense shrubby vegetation consists of open areas mixed with long -agricultural and other land grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring developments treed areas along the APEC 1 western boundary and aquatic envriornments with variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Yellow -breasted Chat SC SC - dense thickets around wood edges, riparian areas, Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - deforestation and land development Icteria virens virens and in overgrown clearings. consists of open areas mixed with long grasses, shrubs, and, and naturally occuring treed areas along the APEC 1 western oundary and aquatic envriornments with variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL C13664.00 Pagel of 4 APPENDIX XII - 2 WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Common/Scientific Name SARA' SARO Preferred Habitat Occurrence Habitat Potential at/near APEC Threats miurus pellucida taxus pinetorum NAR - sluggish pools and low gradient streams Possible -habitats include substrates comprised of sands and clean organic debris free from silts and clays -found under rocks or organic debris (sunken logs,twigs, root wads, or submerged leaves) END - sandy bottoms of streams and rivers, and shoals in Possible Lakes -prefers water over limestone bottoms covered with mud, rubble and gravel and silted sand bottoms END END -friable soil, open habitats: natural (deserts, Possible grasslands, forest clearings, alpine areas) or man- (however made (agricultural fields, road right-of-ways, golf unlikely) courses, clearcuts) - aeciouous Torests in areas oT s( sandy soil, beneath deep humus Diopnysicai cononion aunear Hrtc l - poor water quauty aue to sutatnon ana sts of aquatic envriornments with increased turbidity )le sized open areas and dense ative cover associated with the Big Creek biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - poor water quality due to siltation, sts of aquatic envriornments with impoundments, chemical pollution and )le sized open areas and dense acid mine drainage ative cover associated with the Big Creek :)iopnysicai conaition atmear AFLU l - control oT oaagers as nuisance sts of open areas mixed with long animals, roadkill, and underabundance es, shrubs, and, naturally occuring of prey areas along the APEC 1 western habitat destruction Lary and aquatic envriornments with fire suppression of open habitat )le sized open areas and dense ative cover associated with the Big Creek Biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - predatation by cats and dogs sts of open areas mixed with long land clearing through urbanization, es, shrubs sandy soil, and, naturally industrialization and agriculture ing treed areas along the APEC 1 :rn boundary and aquatic xnments with variable sized open and dense vegetative cover :iated with the Big Otter Creek Entered by: RA Reviewed by: GLL PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 2 of 4 Entered by., RA Reviewed by. GLL APPENDIX XII - 2 WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell, Ontario Common/Scientific Name SARA' SARO Preferred Habitat Occurrence Habitat Potential at/near APEC Threats Reptiles Jefferson Salamander Th Th deciduous woodlots, marginal agricultural land, Possible -the biophysical condition at/nearAPEC 1 -limited number of breeding ponds Ambystoma jeffersonianum limestone sinkhole ponds, kettle ponds, and natural consists of open areas mixed with long -loss or fragmentation of habitat basins grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring treed areas along the APEC 1 western boundary and aquatic envriornments with variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Fowler's Toad END END sand dune and lakeshore habitats Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - loss or fragmentation of habitat Anaxyrus fowled consists of open areas mixed with long pesticides grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring -irregular occurring severe winter storms treed areas along the APEC 1 western boundary and aquatic envriornments with variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Blanding's Turtle Th Th large wetlands and shallow lakes with lots of aquatic Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 - loss or fragmentation of habitat Emydoidea blandingii vegetation consists of open areas mixed with long motor vehicles grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring predators treed areas along the APEC 1 western parasitism from sarcophagid fly larvae boundary and aquatic envriornments with variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Milksnake SC SC - fields Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 -habitat destruction and fragmentation Lampropeltis triangulum -swamps consists of open areas mixed with long human persecution open woodlots grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring roadkill most common in heavily forested areas treed areas along the APEC 1 western found in pastures, hayfield, and around man made boundary and aquatic envriornments with structures variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Gray Ratsnake (Carolinian Th END - agricultural land mixed with small patches of open Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 -habitat destruction and fragmantation population) deciduous forests and criss-crossed by a dense consists of open areas mixed with long -farm machinery Pantherophis spiloides roadways grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring human persecution -fields and rocky outcrops treed areas along the APEC 1 western roadkill -in winter hibernate underground boundary and aquatic envriornments with -in summer located in snags, hollow logs, rock variable sized open areas and dense crevices, compost piles vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 3 of 4 Entered by: RA Reviewed by: GLL APPENDIX XII - 2 WILDLIFE SPECIES AT RISK Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Port Burwell. Ontario Common/Scientific Name SARA' SARO Preferred Habitat Occurrence Habitat Potential at/near APEC Threats Reptiles Eastern Ribbonsnake Sc SC along edges of shallow ponds, streams, marshes, Possible the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 -habitat destruction and fragmentation Thamnophis sauritus swamps, or bogs bordered by dense vegatation that consists of open areas mixed with long -declined in prey provides cover grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring -predatation by pets and native wildlife requires abundant sunlight and adjacent upland treed areas along the APEC 1 western human persecution areas for nesting boundary and aquatic envriornments with roadkill variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Massassauga Th - tall grass prairies, cedar bogs, shorelines, brush Possible - the biophysical condition at/near APEC 1 -habitat destruction and fragmentation Sistrurus catenatus piles, granite rock tables, wetlands, or small wet consists of open areas mixed with long human persecution depressions in the terrain grasses, shrubs, and, naturally occuring roadkill treed areas along the APEC 1 western boundary and aquatic envriornments with variable sized open areas and dense vegetative cover associated with the Big Otter Creek Species at Risk listed under Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act SARA Species at Risk Act SARO Species at Risk Ontario SC : Special Concern Th : Threatened End : Endangered - : Data Deficient, or Not Assessed NAR : Not At Risk NOTES: APEC 1 : Area encompasses entire subject site PWGSC Project No. R.059352.008/.009 TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. FINAL CB664.00 Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX XIII LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS Ma am Success Through Science - Your Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Your C.O.C. #: 88220 Attention: Geoff Lussier Terrapex Environmental Ltd 49 Coldwater Rd Toronto, ON M3B 1Y8 Report Date: 2013/01/14 This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: B214244 Received: 2012/11/22,12:39 Sample Matrix: Soil # Samples Received: 15 " RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. (1) Soils are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified. (2) Chlordane ( Total) = Alpha Chlordane + Gamma Chlordane Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Maryann Arghandeh, Email: mArghand@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700 Page 1 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Methylnaphthalene Sum 4 N/A 2012/11/30 CAM SOP - 00301 EPA 8270 Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC (1) 3 2012/11/28 2012/11/29 CAM SOP -00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC (1) 1 2012/11/29 2012/11/29 CAM SOP -00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 4 2012/11/22 2012/11/23 CAM SOP -00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil 4 2012/11/29 2012/11/30 CAM SOP -00316 CCME CWS Total Metals Analysis by ICP 4 2012/11/29 2012/11/29 CAM SOP -00408 SW -846 6010C Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS 4 2012/11/29 2012/11/30 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS 4 2012/11/29 2012/11/30 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Moisture 4 N/A 2012/11/23 CAM SOP -00445 R.Carter,1993 Moisture 4 N/A 2012/11/26 CAM SOP -00445 R.Carter,1993 Moisture 7 N/A 2012/11/28 CAM SOP -00445 R.Carter,1993 OC Pesticides (Selected) & PCB (2) 4 2012/11/23 2012/11/29 CAM SOP -00307 SW846 8081, 8082 PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM) 4 2012/11/26 2012/11/26 CAM SOP - 00318 EPA 8270 pH CaC12 EXTRACT 3 2012/11/28 2012/11/28 CAM SOP -00413 SM 4500H+ B pH CaC12 EXTRACT 1 2012/11/29 2012/11/29 CAM SOP -00413 SM 4500H+ B " RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. (1) Soils are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified. (2) Chlordane ( Total) = Alpha Chlordane + Gamma Chlordane Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Maryann Arghandeh, Email: mArghand@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700 Page 1 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Success Through Science - Attention: Geoff Lussier Terrapex Environmental Ltd 49 Coldwater Rd Toronto, ON M3B 1Y8 Your Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Your C.O.C. #: 88220 Report Date: 2013/01/14 This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS -2- Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 2 Page 2 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma K.a m Maxxam Job #: 13214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Scienceo Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SOIL Maxxam ID PS1699 PS1700 PS1701 PS1702 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units MW101-1A JQC Batch I MW101-113 JQC Batch I MW101-1C JQC Batch I MW101-3 RDL 1QC Batch Inorganics Chromium (VI) ug/g ND 3052495 0.2 Moisture % 8.0 3047295 8.8 3051681 9.4 3051595 17 1.0 3048981 Available (CaC12) pH pH 7.11 3051410 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Maxxam ID PS1702 PS1703 PS1704 PS1705 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units MW101-3 Lab -Du MW101-6 QC Batch MW102-1A QC Batch MW102-16 RDL QC Batch Inorganics Moisture % 19 18 3048981 12 3047295 8.0 1.0+3051681 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Maxxam ID PS1706 PS1707 PS1708 PS1709 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 �C!Batch 88220 �C!Batch Units MW102-1C IQCBatch MW102-11D MW102-1E MW102-11F RDL 1QC Batch Inorganics Chromium (VI) ug/g ND 3051798 ND 0.2 3051798 Moisture % 4.1 3051595 12 3047295 9.5 3051681 7.7 1.0 3051595 Available (CaC12) pH pH 7.60 3051410 7.78 3052583 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 3 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma K.a m Maxxam Job #: 13214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SOIL Maxxam ID PS1709 PS1710 PS1711 PS1712 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units MW102-11F Lab -Du QCBatch MW102-4 QC Batch MW103-1A QC Batch MW103-1B RDL QC Batch Inorganics Chromium (VI) ug/g 3051798 ND 0.2 3051798 Moisture % 3051595 18 3048981 17 3047295 14 1.0 3051595 Available (CaCl2) pH pH 7.83 3052583 7.64 3051410 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Maxxam ID PS1713 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 Units MW103-4 RDL JQC Batch Inorganics Moisture % 25 1.0+3048981 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 4 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL) MaxxamID PS1701 PS1706 PS1706 PS1709 PS1712 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units MW101-1C MW102-1C MW102-1C Lab -Du MW102-1F MW103-113 RDL QC Batch Metals Acid Extractable Sulphur (S) ug/g 200 170 150 64 50 3052737 Acid Extractable Tungsten (W) ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 1 3053160 Acid Extractable Zirconium (Zr) ug/g 1 1 1 1 ND 1 3053160 Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3053159 Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) ug/g 1.8 1.7 2.2 ND 1.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) ug/g 8.0 7.8 8.9 8.8 0.50 3053159 Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3053159 Acid Extractable Bismuth (Bi) ug/g ND ND ND ND 1.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Boron (B) ug/g ND ND ND ND 5.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.10 3053159 Acid Extractable Calcium (Ca) ug/g 76000 67000 69000 47000 50 3053159 Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) ug/g 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 1.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) ug/g 1.7 1.7 2.1 1.4 0.10 3053159 Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) ug/g 4.1 3.9 4.3 3.0 0.50 3053159 Acid Extractable Iron (Fe) ug/g 5400 4600 5600 4400 50 3053159 Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) ug/g 3.8 3.6 3.8 2.6 1.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Magnesium (Mg) ug/g 9900 8400 9000 8000 50 3053159 Acid Extractable Manganese (Mn) ug/g 190 180 210 140 1.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.50 13053159 Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) ug/g 3.2 3.2 3.6 2.5 0.50 3053159 Acid Extractable Phosphorus (P) ug/g 520 370 400 460 50 3053159 Acid Extractable Potassium (K) ug/g ND ND ND ND 200 3053159 Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.50 3053159 Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3053159 Acid Extractable Sodium (Na) ug/g ND ND ND ND 100 3053159 Acid Extractable Strontium (Sr) ug/g 95 83 84 57 1.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Thallium (TI) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.050 3053159 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) ug/g ND ND ND ND 5.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Uranium (U) ug/g 0.25 0.22 0.22 0.19 0.050 3053159 Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) ug/g 8.5 6.3 7.3 6.4 5.0 3053159 Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) ug/g 15 13 14 14 5.0 3053159 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 5 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma K.a m Maxxam Job #: 13214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL) Maxxam ID PS1701 PS1706 PS1706 PS1709 PS1712 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units MW101-1C MW102-1C MW102-1C Lab -Du MW102-1F MW103-16 RDL QC Batch Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.050 3053159 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 6 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC -MS (SOIL) MaxxamID PS1700 PS1705 PS1708 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 Units I MW101-1B I RDL IQC Batch I MW102-113 I RDL I MW102-1E I RDL C Batch Calculated Parameters Methylnaphthalene, 2-(1-) ug/g 0.75 0.0071 3045049 5.1 0.0071 2.0 0.0071 3046125 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene ug/g ND (1) 0.010 3048664 0.10 0.0050 ND (1) 0.030 3048664 Acenaphthylene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 0.0089 0.0050 ND (1) 0.010 3048664 Anthracene ug/g 0.028 0.0050 13048664 0.042 0.0050 1 0.020 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/g 0.063 0.0050 3048664 0.23 0.0050 0.086 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/g 0.028 0.0050 3048664 0.080 0.0050 0.033 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene ug/g 0.028 0.0050 3048664 0.12 0.0050 0.047 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/g 0.017 0.0050 3048664 0.057 0.0050 0.029 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/g 0.0053 0.0050 3048664 0.021 0.0050 0.0097 0.0050 3048664 Ch rysene ug/g 0.093 0.0050 3048664 0.32 0.0050 0.12 0.0050 3048664 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/g 0.0056 0.0050 3048664 0.017 0.0050 0.0068 0.0050 3048664 Fluoranthene ug/g 0.046 0.0050 3048664 0.22 0.0050 0.081 0.0050 3048664 Fluorene ug/g 0.015 0.0050 3048664 0.077 0.0050 0.025 0.0050 3048664 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/g 0.0063 0.0050 3048664 0.028 0.0050 0.012 0.0050 3048664 1 -Methylnaphthalene ug/g 0.34 0.0050 13048664 2.3 0.0050 1 0.80 0.0050 3048664 2 -Methylnaphthalene ug/g 0.41 0.0050 3048664 2.7 0.0050 1.2 0.0050 3048664 Naphthalene ug/g 0.16 0.0050 3048664 1.3 0.0050 0.56 0.0050 3048664 Phenanthrene ug/g 0.32 0.0050 3048664 1.8 0.0050 0.58 0.0050 3048664 Pyrene ug/g 0.061 0.0050 3048664 0.26 0.0050 0.095 0.0050 3048664 Surrogate Recovery (%) D10 -Anthracene % 100 3048664 72 100 3048664 D14-Terphenyl(FS) % 93 3048664 79 93 3048664 D8 -Acenaphthylene % 94 3048664 69 95 3048664 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch ( 1 ) Detection Limit was raised due to matrix interferences. Page 7 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC -MS (SOIL) Maxxam ID PS1712 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 Units I MW103-113 I RDL JQC Batch Calculated Parameters Methylnaphthalene, 2-(1-) ug/g ND 0.0071 3046125 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Acenaphthylene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Anthracene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/g ND 0.0050 13048664 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Chrysene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Fluoranthene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Fluorene ug/g ND 0.0050 13048664 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 1 -Methylnaphthalene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 2 -Methylnaphthalene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Naphthalene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Phenanthrene ug/g ND 0.0050 13048664 Pyrene ug/g ND 0.0050 3048664 Surrogate Recovery (%) D10 -Anthracene % 98 3048664 D14-Terphenyl(FS) % 91 3048664 D8 -Acenaphthylene % 97 1 13048664 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 8 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma K.a m Maxxam Job #: 13214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Scienceo Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (CCME) Maxxam ID PS1702 PS1703 PS1710 PS1713 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units I MW101-3 MW101-6 MW102-4 I MW103-4 I RDL JQC Batch BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons Benzene ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.005 3046403 Toluene ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.02 3046403 Ethylbenzene ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.01 3046403 o -Xylene ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.02 3046403 p+m-Xylene ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.04 3046403 Total Xylenes ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.04 3046403 F1 (C6 -C10) ug/g ND ND ND ND 10 3046403 F1 (C6 -C10) - BTEX ug/g ND ND ND ND 10 3046403 F2 -F4 Hydrocarbons F2 (C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) ug/g 13 13 20 ND 10 3052597 F3 (C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) ug/g 40 44 58 40 10 3052597 F4 (C34-050 Hydrocarbons) ug/g ND ND ND ND 10 3052597 Reached Baseline at C50 ug/g Yes Yes Yes Yes 3052597 Surrogate Recovery (%) 1,4-Difluorobenzene % 94 93 95 94 13046403 4-Bromofluorobenzene % 104 102 103 104 3046403 D10 -Ethyl benzene % 71 73 73 72 3046403 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 98 96 98 98 3046403 o-Terphenyl % 102 102 105 103 3052597 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 9 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA ORGANOCHLORI NATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SOIL) MaxxamID PS1699 PS1704 PS1707 PS1711 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units I MW101-1A MW102-1A MW102-11D MW103-1A I RDL C Batch Pesticides & Herbicides Aldrin ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 a -Chlordane ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 g -Chlordane ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Chlordane (Total) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 o,p-DDD ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 p,p-DDD ug/g ND 0.0020 0.0030 ND 0.0020 3047062 o,p-DDD + p,p-DDD ug/g ND 0.0020 0.0030 ND 0.0020 3047062 o,p-DDE ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 p,p-DDE ug/g ND 0.018 0.018 0.0090 0.0020 13047062 o,p-DDE + p,p-DDE ug/g ND 0.018 0.018 0.0090 0.0020 3047062 o,p-DDT ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 p,p-DDT ug/g ND 0.0050 0.016 ND 0.0020 3047062 o,p-DDT + p,p-DDT ug/g ND 0.0050 0.016 ND 0.0020 3047062 Dieldrin ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 13047062 Lindane ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Endosulfan I (alpha) ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Endosulfan 11 ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Total Endosulfan ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Endrin ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 13047062 Heptachlor ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Heptachlor epoxide ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Hexachlorobenzene ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3047062 Hexachlorobutadiene ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3047062 Hexachloroethane ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 13047062 Methoxychlor ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3047062 Aroclor 1242 ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3047062 Aroclor 1248 ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3047062 Aroclor 1254 ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3047062 Aroclor 1260 ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3047062 Total PCB ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3047062 Surrogate Recovery (%) 2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene % 76 79 76 80 3047062 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 10 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma K.a m Maxxam Job #: 13214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SOIL) MaxxamID PS1699 PS1704 PS1707 PS1711 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 COC Number 88220 88220 88220 88220 Units I MW101-1A I MW102-1A I MW102-11) I MW103-1A I RDL IQC Batch Decachlorobiphenyl % 91 92 1 90 1 90 1 3047062 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 11 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B214244 Report Date: 2013/01/14 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Package 1 Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt GENERAL COMMENTS Revised report (2013/01/14): Parameter list for the Metal analysis has been revised. Results relate only to the items tested. Page 12 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ra Ma am Quality Assurance Report Maxxam Job Number: MB214244 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Attention: Geoff Lussier Client Project #: CB664.00 P.O. #: Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits 3045049 ASC RPD Methylnaphthalene, 2-(1-) 2012/11/23 NC % N/A 3046403 LRA Matrix Spike 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2012/11/23 95 % 60-140 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/11/23 104 % 60-140 D10 -Ethyl benzene 2012/11/23 74 % 60-140 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2012/11/23 98 % 60-140 Benzene 2012/11/23 98 % 60-140 Toluene 2012/11/23 80 % 60-140 Ethylbenzene 2012/11/23 87 % 60-140 o -Xylene 2012/11/23 83 % 60-140 p+m-Xylene 2012/11/23 75 % 60-140 F1 (C6 -C10) 2012/11/23 90 % 60-140 Spiked Blank 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2012/11/23 95 % 60-140 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/11/23 103 % 60-140 D10 -Ethyl benzene 2012/11/23 77 % 60-140 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2012/11/23 97 % 60-140 Benzene 2012/11/23 99 % 60-130 Toluene 2012/11/23 84 % 60-130 Ethylbenzene 2012/11/23 91 % 60-130 o -Xylene 2012/11/23 86 % 60-130 p+m-Xylene 2012/11/23 78 % 60-130 F1 (C6 -C10) 2012/11/23 89 % 80-120 Method Blank 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2012/11/23 96 % 60-140 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/11/23 103 % 60-140 D10 -Ethyl benzene 2012/11/23 81 % 60-140 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2012/11/23 98 % 60-140 Benzene 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=0.005 ug/g Toluene 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/g Ethylbenzene 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=0.01 ug/g o -Xylene 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/g p+m-Xylene 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=0.04 ug/g Total Xylenes 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=0.04 ug/g F1 (C6 -C10) 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=10 ug/g F1 (C6 -C10) - BTEX 2012/11/23 ND, RDL=10 ug/g RPD Benzene 2012/11/23 3.3 % 50 Toluene 2012/11/23 14.3 % 50 Ethylbenzene 2012/11/23 16.5 % 50 o -Xylene 2012/11/23 16.1 % 50 p+m-Xylene 2012/11/23 16.6 % 50 Total Xylenes 2012/11/23 16.3 % 50 F1 (C6 -C10) 2012/11/23 28.2 % 50 F1 (C6 -C10) - BTEX 2012/11/23 28.6 % 50 3047062 NZ1 Matrix Spike 2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene 2012/11/29 88 % 50-130 Decachlorobiphenyl 2012/11/29 93 % 50-130 Aldrin 2012/11/29 92 % 50-130 a -Chlordane 2012/11/29 107 % 50-130 g -Chlordane 2012/11/29 114 % 50-130 o,p-DDD 2012/11/29 112 % 50-130 p,p-DDD 2012/11/29 102 % 50-130 o,p-DDE 2012/11/29 114 % 50-130 p,p-DDE 2012/11/29 132(l) % 50-130 o,p-DDT 2012/11/29 114 % 50-130 p,p-DDT 2012/11/29 113 % 50-130 Dieldrin 2012/11/29 90 % 50-130 Lindane 2012/11/29 107 % 50-130 Endosulfan I (alpha) 2012/11/29 99 % 50-130 Page 13 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Attention: Geoff Lussier Client Project #: CB664.00 P.O. #: Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: MB214244 QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits 3047062 NZ1 Matrix Spike Endosulfan II 2012/11/29 102 % 50-130 Endrin 2012/11/29 95 % 50-130 Heptachlor 2012/11/29 117 % 50-130 Heptachlor epoxide 2012/11/29 106 % 50-130 Hexachlorobenzene 2012/11/29 98 % 50-130 Hexachlorobutadiene 2012/11/29 78 % 50-130 Hexachloroethane 2012/11/29 87 % 50-130 Methoxychlor 2012/11/29 100 % 50-130 Spiked Blank 2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene 2012/11/29 86 % 50-130 Decachlorobiphenyl 2012/11/29 100 % 50-130 Aldrin 2012/11/29 97 % 50-130 a -Chlordane 2012/11/29 101 % 50-130 g -Chlordane 2012/11/29 94 % 50-130 o,p-DDD 2012/11/29 93 % 50-130 p,p-DDD 2012/11/29 97 % 50-130 o,p-DDE 2012/11/29 116 % 50-130 p,p-DDE 2012/11/29 115 % 50-130 o,p-DDT 2012/11/29 105 % 50-130 p,p-DDT 2012/11/29 106 % 50-130 Dieldrin 2012/11/29 96 % 50-130 Lindane 2012/11/29 86 % 50-130 Endosulfan I (alpha) 2012/11/29 83 % 50-130 Endosulfan II 2012/11/29 84 % 50-130 Endrin 2012/11/29 93 % 50-130 Heptachlor 2012/11/29 104 % 50-130 Heptachlor epoxide 2012/11/29 89 % 50-130 Hexachlorobenzene 2012/11/29 91 % 50-130 Hexachlorobutadiene 2012/11/29 97 % 50-130 Hexachloroethane 2012/11/29 103 % 50-130 Methoxychlor 2012/11/29 82 % 50-130 RPD Aroclor 1242 2012/11/29 NC % 40 Total PCB 2012/11/29 NC % 40 Method Blank 2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene 2012/11/29 90 % 50-130 Decachlorobiphenyl 2012/11/29 102 % 50-130 Aldrin 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g a -Chlordane 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g g -Chlordane 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Chlordane (Total) 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g o,p-DDD 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g p,p-DDD 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g o,p-DDD + p,p-DDD 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g o,p-DDE 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g p,p-DDE 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g o,p-DDE + p,p-DDE 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g o,p-DDT 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g p,p-DDT 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g o,p-DDT + p,p-DDT 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Dieldrin 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Lindane 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Endosulfan I (alpha) 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Endosulfan II 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Total Endosulfan 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Endrin 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Heptachlor 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Heptachlor epoxide 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Page 14 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxarn r:a Ma am Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Attention: Geoff Lussier Client Project #: CB664.00 P.O. #: Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: MB214244 QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits 3047062 NZ1 Method Blank Hexachlorobenzene 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g Hexachlorobutadiene 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Hexachloroethane 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Methoxychlor 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Aroclor 1242 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.015 ug/g Aroclor 1248 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.015 ug/g Aroclor 1254 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.015 ug/g Aroclor 1260 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.015 ug/g Total PCB 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.015 ug/g RPD a -Chlordane 2012/11/29 NC % 40 g -Chlordane 2012/11/29 NC % 40 Chlordane (Total) 2012/11/29 NC % 40 o,p-DDT 2012/11/29 NC % 40 p,p-DDT 2012/11/29 NC % 40 o,p-DDT + p,p-DDT 2012/11/29 NC % 40 3047295 JL2 RPD Moisture 2012/11/23 5.3 % 20 3048664 DTI Matrix Spike D10 -Anthracene 2012/11/26 87 % 50-130 D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2012/11/26 82 % 50-130 D8 -Acenaphthylene 2012/11/26 81 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/11/26 74 % 50-130 Acenaphthylene 2012/11/26 87 % 50-130 Anthracene 2012/11/26 128 % 50-130 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/11/26 NC (2) % 50-130 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Chrysene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/11/26 68 % 50-130 Fluoranthene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Fluorene 2012/11/26 81 % 50-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 1 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 71 % 50-130 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 68 % 50-130 Naphthalene 2012/11/26 71 % 50-130 Phenanthrene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Pyrene 2012/11/26 NC % 50-130 Spiked Blank D10 -Anthracene 2012/11/26 90 % 50-130 D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2012/11/26 86 % 50-130 D8 -Acenaphthylene 2012/11/26 83 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/11/26 83 % 50-130 Acenaphthylene 2012/11/26 104 % 50-130 Anthracene 2012/11/26 87 % 50-130 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/11/26 98 % 50-130 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/11/26 95 % 50-130 Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 90 % 50- 130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/11/26 93 % 50-130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 81 % 50-130 Chrysene 2012/11/26 95 % 50-130 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/11/26 92 % 50-130 Fluoranthene 2012/11/26 92 % 50-130 Fluorene 2012/11/26 84 % 50-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/11/26 93 % 50-130 1 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 80 % 50-130 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 91 % 50-130 Page 15 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Attention: Geoff Lussier Client Project #: CB664.00 P.O. #: Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: MB214244 QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits 3048664 DTI Spiked Blank Naphthalene 2012/11/26 81 % 50-130 Phenanthrene 2012/11/26 88 % 50-130 Pyrene 2012/11/26 95 % 50-130 Method Blank D10 -Anthracene 2012/11/26 94 % 50-130 D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2012/11/26 89 % 50-130 D8 -Acenaphthylene 2012/11/26 83 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Acenaphthylene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Anthracene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Chrysene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Fluoranthene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Fluorene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g 1 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Naphthalene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Phenanthrene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g Pyrene 2012/11/26 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g RPD Acenaphthene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 Acenaphthylene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 Anthracene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/11/26 48.8(3) % 40 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/11/26 17.6 % 40 Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 10.6 % 40 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/11/26 0.4 % 40 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/11/26 13.3 % 40 Chrysene 2012/11/26 26.5 % 40 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 Fluoranthene 2012/11/26 29.4 % 40 Fluorene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/11/26 4.6 % 40 1 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 Naphthalene 2012/11/26 NC % 40 Phenanthrene 2012/11/26 21.2 % 40 Pyrene 2012/11/26 29.3 % 40 3048981 JL2 RPD [PS1702-01] Moisture 2012/11/26 13.0 % 20 3051595 JL2 RPD Moisture 2012/11/28 0 % 20 3051681 THT RPD Moisture 2012/11/28 NC % 20 3051798 SAC Matrix Spike Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 51 (4) % 75-125 QC Standard Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 90 % 75-125 Spiked Blank Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 92 % 80-120 Method Blank Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/g RPD Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 NC % 35 3052495 SAC Matrix Spike Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 71 (4) % 75-125 QC Standard Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 108 % 75-125 Spiked Blank Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 109 % 80-120 Method Blank Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/g RPD Chromium (VI) 2012/11/29 NC % 35 Page 16 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma K"X1 a rn Success Through Scienceo Terrapex Environmental Ltd Attention: Geoff Lussier Client Project #: CB664.00 P.O. #: Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: M6214244 QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits 3052597 KLI Matrix Spike o-Terphenyl 2012/11/30 98 % 50-130 F2 (C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 97 % 50-130 F3 (C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 101 % 50-130 F4 (C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 96 % 50-130 Spiked Blank o-Terphenyl 2012/11/30 95 % 50-130 F2 (C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 97 % 80-120 F3 (C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 100 % 80-120 F4 (C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 96 % 80-120 Method Blank o-Terphenyl 2012/11/30 103 % 50-130 F2 (C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=10 ug/g F3 (C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=10 ug/g F4 (C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=10 ug/g RPD F2 (C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 F3 (C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 F4 (C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 3052737 SUK Matrix Spike Acid Extractable Sulphur (S) 2012/11/29 102 % 75-125 Spiked Blank Acid Extractable Sulphur (S) 2012/11/29 100 % 80-120 Method Blank Acid Extractable Sulphur (S) 2012/11/29 ND, RDL=50 ug/g 3053159 VIV Matrix Spike Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2012/11/30 100 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2012/11/30 96 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2012/11/30 99 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2012/11/30 92 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Bismuth (Bi) 2012/11/30 93 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Boron (B) 2012/11/30 91 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2012/11/30 99 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Calcium (Ca) 2012/11/30 NC % 75-125 Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2012/11/30 95 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2012/11/30 91 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2012/11/30 89 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Iron (Fe) 2012/11/30 NC % 75-125 Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2012/11/30 92 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Magnesium (Mg) 2012/11/30 NC % 75-125 Acid Extractable Manganese (Mn) 2012/11/30 NC % 75-125 Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/11/30 98 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2012/11/30 94 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Phosphorus (P) 2012/11/30 NC % 75-125 Acid Extractable Potassium (K) 2012/11/30 97 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2012/11/30 97 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2012/11/30 99 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Sodium (Na) 2012/11/30 99 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Strontium (Sr) 2012/11/30 NC % 75-125 Acid Extractable Thallium (TI) 2012/11/30 91 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) 2012/11/30 103 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Uranium (U) 2012/11/30 98 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2012/11/30 94 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2012/11/30 95 % 75-125 Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2012/11/30 93 % 75-125 Spiked Blank Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2012/11/30 103 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2012/11/30 99 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2012/11/30 103 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2012/11/30 95 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Bismuth (Bi) 2012/11/30 97 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Boron (B) 2012/11/30 92 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2012/11/30 101 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Calcium (Ca) 2012/11/30 108 % 80-120 Page 17 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free.- 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www,maxxam.ca Ma K"X1 a rn Success Through Scienceo Terrapex Environmental Ltd Attention: Geoff Lussier Client Project #: CB664.00 P.O. #: Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: M6214244 QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits 3053159 VIV Spiked Blank Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2012/11/30 98 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2012/11/30 97 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2012/11/30 93 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Iron (Fe) 2012/11/30 104 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2012/11/30 98 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Magnesium (Mg) 2012/11/30 103 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Manganese (Mn) 2012/11/30 99 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/11/30 98 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2012/11/30 100 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Phosphorus (P) 2012/11/30 97 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Potassium (K) 2012/11/30 102 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2012/11/30 100 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2012/11/30 100 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Sodium (Na) 2012/11/30 101 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Strontium (Sr) 2012/11/30 98 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Thallium (TI) 2012/11/30 96 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) 2012/11/30 103 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Uranium (U) 2012/11/30 103 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2012/11/30 94 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2012/11/30 102 % 80-120 Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2012/11/30 106 % 80-120 Method Blank Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/g Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.50 ug/g Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/g Acid Extractable Bismuth (Bi) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Boron (B) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=5.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.10 ug/g Acid Extractable Calcium (Ca) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=50 ug/g Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.10 ug/g Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.50 ug/g Acid Extractable Iron (Fe) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=50 ug/g Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Magnesium (Mg) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=50 ug/g Acid Extractable Manganese (Mn) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.50 ug/g Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.50 ug/g Acid Extractable Phosphorus (P) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=50 ug/g Acid Extractable Potassium (K) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=200 ug/g Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.50 ug/g Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/g Acid Extractable Sodium (Na) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=100 ug/g Acid Extractable Strontium (Sr) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Thallium (TI) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.050 ug/g Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=5.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Uranium (U) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.050 ug/g Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=5.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=5.0 ug/g Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=0.050 ug/g RPD Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Arsenic (As) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Barium (Ba) 2012/11/30 11.7 % 30 Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Boron (B) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Page 18 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free.- 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www,maxxam.ca Ma am Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Attention: Geoff Lussier Client Project #: CB664.00 P.O. #: Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: MB214244 QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter /mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits 3053159 VIV RPD Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co) 2012/11/30 9.0 % 30 Acid Extractable Copper (Cu) 2012/11/30 8.0 % 30 Acid Extractable Lead (Pb) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni) 2012/11/30 7.2 % 30 Acid Extractable Selenium (Se) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Silver (Ag) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Thallium (TI) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Uranium (U) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Vanadium (V) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg) 2012/11/30 NC % 30 3053160 HIRE Method Blank Acid Extractable Tungsten (W) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1 ug/g Acid Extractable Zirconium (Zr) 2012/11/30 ND, RDL=1 ug/g RPD [PS1706-01] Acid Extractable Tungsten (W) 2012/11/30 NC % 35 Acid Extractable Zirconium Zr 2012/11/30 NC % 35 N/A = Not Applicable Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. QC Standard: A sample of known concentration prepared by an external agency under stringent conditions. Used as an independent check of method accuracy. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. ( 1 ) The recovery was above the upper control limit. This may represent a high bias in some results for this specific analyte. ( 2 ) The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated (NC). Because of the high concentration of this analyte in the parent sample, the relative difference between the spiked and unspiked concentrations is not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. (3) Duplicate results exceeded RPD acceptance criteria. The variability in the results for this specific analyte may be more pronounced. ( 4 ) The matrix spike recovery was below the lower control limit. This may be due in part to the reducing environment of the sample. Page 19 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma K.a m Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job #: 6214244 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Char es Ancker, B.Sc , M.Sc., CChem, Senior Analyst 04c`0� cztr, L Cristina Carriere, Scientific Services 11 i'�I Medhat Riskallah, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department Suzana Popovic, SupIf ervisor, Hydrocarbons A4AA��� Yuan u, gc\ms Technician Success Through Scienceo Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 20 of 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation O/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free.- 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www,maxxam.ca p� %�* ' CHAIN OF OUST( Y RECORD V I a y d M 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, ON LSN 21-8 • Phone: 9D5-817-5700 Fax: 906-817-5779 Toll Free: $00) 563-6266 88220 Page o4` INVOICE INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION (if differs from Invoice) PROJECT INFORMATION MAXXAM JOB NUMBER Company Name: 04 n11ACompany Name: ��V Y�1 �'� Quatatlon �' 2- a Contact Name: r 551l�c Contact Name: P.O, # � CHAIN OF CUSTODY # - � Address: � `� r %V I� rIC Address:` Project #; f Ll n/ rYV U �✓ I Q 7� Site Location: Phone: D%� _ r% ax: ly f� Phone: Fax: Slie #: 00 Email; Email: Sampled By: 1914 J J **•Nate; Fur MOE Regulated Drinking Water samples, please use the Drinking Water Cath"* ANALYSIS REQUESTED (Please be RegulatiojInd/Comm Other Regulations Table 1 aFlne COME Sanitary Sewer Bylaw Table 2 oarse Reg. 558 Storm Sewer BylawrTa51e 3 For RSC MISMunicipality: r Teble Yes PWQC Y M No Other {speciry): o K Include Criteria on Certificate of Analysis (YIN)? � LL � � ,4 SAMPLES MUST BE KEPT COOL SAMPLING UNTIL DELIVERY TO i' w MAXXAM. OC m ; lk 4 Sample Identification p Dat6' TIme Matrix Sampled Sam led few, si sgo, nt�.l i1 Xv T IY1 o/01 5 rn wi 1 s /,� W lU �' l � ►'� 7 � SE PROVIDE ADVANi Regular (Standard) TAT: (5.7working days for most tests] Rush TAT —Samples must be received by apm to guaranlee your TAT"' Rush Conlirmaticn #: PN 1 day 2 days 3 days Date Req'd: TATs kr cadam lasts are 5 dabs. Please canlect your Project Manager ler deialra. coni. 22 -Nov -1212:39 Mfttyam Arghandeh III111111111�IIIIIVIIVII111 B214244 FW ENV -967 W!(7Z — m i fQ 1. Pr�N UQN 10 -- I *RELINQUISHED BY {Signature/Print) ,Date (YYYY MlDD) Time. REC D BY: (Signature/Print) Date (YYYYIMMIDD) Time*" #JARS U'&MAND LaboratT Use Only �� � !% �� NOT SUBMITTED Custody Temperature ('C) an Receipt /l! Seal Yes No J ' Present I Intact A ONS IN GREY MUST BE FILLED CUT AN INCOMPLETE CHAIN OF CUSTODY MAY RESULT IN ANALYTICAL TAT DELAYS. MANDATORY SECTI COC -1064 (066`121- ENV, ENG. Maxim Analytics Gnternallonal Corporstlon 0/9 Maxxam Malytics White! Maxxam Yellow: Mall Pink: Cllenl I D L/ i Ma a `, a .M i 40 Campobello PVd, Mississauga, ON 15N 21_8 4 Phone: 905.81.7-5700 Fax: 905-817-5779 Toll Free: (800) 563-6266 CHAIN OF CUST G 88233 (RECORD Page 01 of INVOICE INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION (if differs from invoice) PROJECT INFORMATION MAXXAM JOB NUMBER � / fl _ , )�y Company Name. fG yf/// 't ',!r . Lf mpany Nama ul �''^ 0votatinn --b; — � 9 3 r Contact �~ - / Name; Contact Name: P.O. CHAIN OF CUSTODY. 0 Address. ��' l Address: Project tt: 'Locatlore (.flit LL V 11 / Phone: 1 6 M1l M 4Wxf 0 r 2 YLI Phone. Fax: sit, Site 4: _ Sampled By: 00 Emall:5 +>r �t f 1 ,&4X L ill Email: —Nate: For MOE Regulated Drinking Water samples, please use the Drinking Water Goff.* ANALYSIS REQUESTED (Please be specific) TURNAROUND TIME (TAT) REQUIRED Regulation 153 (2011) Other Regulations r PLEASE PROVIDEADVANCE ' FOR Table 1 Res/Park MedlE ne COME Sanitary 5euar Bylaw Regular {Standard) TAT: Table 2 Ind/Comm Coarse 1558 Sicrm Sewer Bylaw (5-7 working days for most tests) Tabre 8 AgrllOthar For RSC MISA Munlclpality: ?I: V Rush TAT. "'Sampl9s must be rac ivad by Spm to guarantee your TAT" - Table Yes PWCC 'a No Other (specify); g o * 1k V y Rush Confirmation #: PN 1 day 7 clays 3 days Include Criteria on Certificate of Analysis (YIN)? l �N rr u i� �t -k Date Req'd: SAMPLES MUST BECOOL r ` a rr DE • ,SAMPLING UNTILSample W a n 1 1J TATs for twain lasts are > 5 days Please eanfacl' your Aofnct Manager Mr Met& Time Sampled Matrix (Ow.sw. sou. etc.) of Corit. COMMENTS TRT COMMENTS Identification Date — Sampled O U 1 I/� t w ! /_ 3 In w ill — 14 —1 N XVr 03 tv e 7 • 9 10 'RELINQUISHED BY (Signature/Print) Date (YYYY/MM/DD) Tlme: R ED BY: (SignaturelPrint) Date "W/Ml Time. #JARS USED AND NOT SUBMITTED Laboratory Use Orly F r All�� } •, l I +�Z Custody Seal Yes No Tempe1,50 lur°C) on Receipt j� �'" _ — I! Intact r *MANDATORY SECTIONS IN GREY MUST BE FILLED OUT. AMINCOMPLETE CHAIN OF CUSTODY MAY RESULT IN ANALYTICAL TAT DELAYS. COC4M (001121- ENV. ENG. Maxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Mamam Anoylles White: Wmam Yellow Mail Pink. Chant Ma am Your Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Your C.O.C. #: 88222 Attention: Geoff Lussier Terrapex Environmental Ltd 49 Coldwater Rd Toronto, ON M3B 1Y8 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: B2J3687 Received: 2012/12/07, 14:19 Sample Matrix: Soil # Samples Received: 6 Success Through Science - Report Date: 2012/12/19 Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. ./2 Page 1 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Chloride (20:1 extract) 6 N/A 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00463 EPA 325.2 Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC (1) 6 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 CAM SOP -00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 6 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 CAM SOP -00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil 6 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00316 CCME CWS Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil 6 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00448 APHA 4500FC Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS 2 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS 4 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS 6 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Moisture 6 N/A 2012/12/12 CAM SOP -00445 R.Carter,1993 Ammonia -N 6 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00441 Carter, SS&A Nitrate (NO3) and Nitrite (NO2) in Soil 6 N/A 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00440 SM 4500 NO3I/NO2B OC Pesticides (Selected) & PCB (2) 3 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 CAM SOP -00307 SW846 8081, 8082 PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM) 6 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 CAM SOP - 00318 EPA 8270 pH CaCl2 EXTRACT 2 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00413 SM 4500H+ B pH CaCl2 EXTRACT 4 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00413 SM 4500H+ B Sulphate (20:1 Extract) 6 N/A 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00464 EPA 375.4 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen - Soil 6 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00454 EPA 351.2 Rev 2 Total Organic Carbon in Soil 6 N/A 2012/12/19 CAM SOP -00468 LECO Combustion Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. ./2 Page 1 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 -2- " Results relate only to the items tested. (1) Soils are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified. (2) Chlordane ( Total) = Alpha Chlordane + Gamma Chlordane Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Maryann Arghandeh, Email: mArghand@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 2 Page 2 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 CCME PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (SOIL) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID I PX1486 I I PX1487 I PX1487 I PX1488 I PX1489 I PX1490 I PX1491 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 1 12012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 Units SED4-1 RDL SED5-1 SE135-1 Lab -Du SED6-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 SED9-1 RDL QC Batch Inorganics Moisture % 45 1.0 20 24 16 17 35 1.0 3067663 BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons Benzene Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.005 ND ND ND ND ND 0.005 3069614 Toluene Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 3069614 Eth (benzene ug/g ug/g ND 0.01 ND ND ND ND ND 0.01 3069614 o -X lene Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 3069614 +m -X lene Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.04 ND ND ND ND ND 0.04 3069614 Total Xylenes Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.04 ND ND ND ND ND 0.04 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 ug/gug/g ND 10 ND ND ND ND ND 10 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX ug/g ug/g ND 10 ND ND ND ND ND 10 3069614 F2 -F4 Hydrocarbons F2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) u/quq/q ND 20 ND ND 19 ND ND ND 10 3071104 F3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) ug/gug/g 45 20 18 19 53 14 19 24 10 3071104 F4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) ug/gug/g ND 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 3071104 Reached Baseline at C50 ug/g ug/g YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 3071104 Surrogate Recover %a 1,4-Difluorobenzene % 99 100 100 100 100 101 3069614 4-Bromofluorobenzene % 107 108 108 108 109 108 3069614 D10-Eth (benzene % 82 84 78 89 82 79 3069614 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 94 94 95 94 95 93 3069614 o -Ter hen I % 100 98 95 97 97 96 97 3071104 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 3 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SOIL Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1486 I PX1489 PX1487 I PX1490 I PX1488 I I PX1491 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 12012/12/06 1 Units I SED4-1 I QC Batch I SED5-1 I QC Batch I SED6-1 RDL QC Batch Inorganics RDL QC Batch SE139-1 RDL QC Batch Inorganics Total Ammonia -N ug/g ug/g 59 3069865 ND 3069865 ND 25 3069865 Soluble 20:1 Chloride(Cl)ug/g ug/g 30 3071860 ND 3071860 ND 20 3071860 Chromium VI Ug/gUg/g ND 3069359 ND 3069359 ND 0.2 3069359 Fluoride F- ug/gug/g ND 3071858 ND 3071858 ND 5 3071858 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 12000 3074027 5100 3074027 3100 500 3074027 Available CaC12 H pH 7.13 3072248 7.71 3071943 7.69 Total Organic Carbon 3072248 Soluble 20:1 Sulphate SO4 Ug/gUg/g ND 3071862 ND 3071862 ND 20 3071862 Total K eldahl Nitrogen ug/g ug/g 784 3070999 127 3070999 83 10 3070999 Nitrite N ug/gug/g ND 3071861 ND 3071861 ND 0.5 3071861 Nitrate N Ug/gUg/g 4 3071861 ND 3071861 ND 2 3071861 Nitrate + Nitrite Ug/g Ug/g 4 3071861 ND 3071861 ND 3 3071861 Maxxam ID I PX1489 I PX1489 I I PX1490 I I I PX1491 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 1 12012/12/06 1 12012/12/06 Units SED7-1 SE1137-1 Lab -Du QC Batch SED8-1 RDL QC Batch SE139-1 RDL QC Batch Inorganics Total Ammonia -N ug/g ug/g ND 3069865 ND 25 3069865 ND 25 3069865 Soluble 20:1 Chloride(Cl)ug/g ug/g ND 3071860 ND 20 3071860 35 20 3071860 Chromium VI ug/gug/g ND 3069362 ND 0.2 3069359 ND 0.2 3069362 Fluoride F- ug/gug/g ND ND 3071858 ND 5 3071858 ND 5 3071858 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 8200 8400 3074027 7600 500 3074027 14000 500 3074027 Available CaC12 H pH 7.70 3071985 7.72 3071943 7.41 3071985 Soluble 20:1 Sulphate SO4 Ug/gUg/g ND 3071862 ND 20 3071862 ND 20 3071862 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Ug/g Ug/g 40 3070999 48 10 3070999 802 20 3070999 Nitrite N ug/gug/g ND ND 3071861 ND 0.5 3071861 ND 0.5 3071861 Nitrate N ug/gug/g ND ND 3071861 ND 2 3071861 ND 2 3071861 Nitrate + Nitrite Ug/g Ug/g ND ND 3071861 ND 3 3071861 ND 3 3071861 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 4 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca r*%A El El rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1486 I PX1487 PX1488 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 1 12012/12/06 1 12012/12/06 Units I SED4-1 I QC Batch I SED5-1 I QC Batch I SED6-1 I RDL I QC Batch Metals Acid Extractable Thallium TI u/quq/q ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.050 3071865 Acid Extractable Tungsten W u/quq/q ND 3071739 ND 3071739 ND 1 3071739 Acid Extractable Zirconium Zr u/quq/q 3 3071739 1 3071739 1 1 3071739 Acid Extractable Aluminum(Al)u /quq/q 4200 3071865 1300 3071387 1300 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Antimony Sb u/quq/q ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.20 3071865 Acid Extractable Arsenic As u/aua/a 2.0 3071865 1.3 3071387 1.9 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Barium Ba u/quq/q 33 3071865 7.9 3071387 6.2 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Beryllium Be u/quq/q 0.25 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.20 3071865 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd u/quq/q 0.10 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.10 3071865 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca u/quq/q 58000 3071865 59000 3071387 52000 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Chromium Cr u/quq/q 8.1 3071865 3.3 3071387 2.4 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co u/quq/q 3.6 3071865 1.6 3071387 1.6 0.10 3071865 Acid Extractable Copper Cu u/quq/q 9.6 3071865 3.0 3071387 3.2 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Iron Fe u/quq/q 10000 3071865 5000 3071387 3700 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Lead Pb u/quq/q 6.0 3071865 3.0 3071387 3.2 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Magnesium M u/quqlq 11000 3071865 9500 3071387 5900 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn uq1q 390 3071865 160 3071387 150 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Molybdenum Mo u/quq/q ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni u/quq/q 7.8 3071865 3.4 3071387 3.7 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P u/quq/q 670 3071865 550 3071387 190 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Potassium K u/quqlq 470 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 200 3071865 Acid Extractable Selenium Se u/quq/q ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Silver A u/quq/q ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.20 3071865 Acid Extractable Sodium Na u/quq/q ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 100 3071865 Acid Extractable Strontium Sr uq1q 78 3071865 74 3071387 67 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) u/aua/a ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 5.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Uranium U u/quq/q 0.26 3071865 0.23 3071387 0.18 0.050 3071865 Acid Extractable Vanadium V u/quq/q 13 3071865 7.4 3071387 ND 5.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn u/quq/q 36 3071865 14 3071387 11 5.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Mercury H u/quq/q ND 3071865 ND 3071387 ND 0.050 1 3071865 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 5 of 22 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a i/laxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1489 I PX1489 I I I PX1490 I PX1491 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 1 12012/12/06 2012/12/06 Units SED7-1 RDL QC Batch SED7-1 Lab -Du RDL QC Batch SED8-1 SED9-1 RDL QC Batch Metals Acid Extractable Thallium TI ug/gug/g ND 0.050 3071387 ND 0.05 3071739 ND 0.068 0.050 3071865 Acid Extractable Tungsten W ug/gug/g ND 1 3071739 ND 1 3071739 ND ND 1 3071739 Acid Extractable Zirconium Zr ug/gug/g 1 1 3071739 1 1 3071739 ND 4 1 3071739 Acid Extractable Aluminum(Al)ug/g ug/g 1200 50 3071387 1200 6700 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Antimony Sb ug/gug/g ND 0.20 3071387 ND ND 0.20 3071865 Acid Extractable Arsenic As ug/gug/g 1.7 1.0 3071387 1.7 3.1 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Barium Ba ug/gug/g 5.7 0.50 3071387 6.7 54 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Beryllium Be ug/gug/g ND 0.20 3071387 ND 0.39 0.20 3071865 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd ug/gug/g ND 0.10 3071387 ND 0.17 0.10 3071865 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca Ug/gUg/g 81000 50 3071387 82000 65000 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Chromium Cr ug/gug/g 8.2 1.0 3071387 3.5 11 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co Ug/gUg/g 1.9 0.10 3071387 1.6 5.3 0.10 3071865 Acid Extractable Copper Cu ug/gug/g 2.9 0.50 3071387 3.6 15 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Iron Fe ug/gug/g 13000 50 3071387 4500 15000 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Lead Pb ug/gug/g 3.3 1.0 3071387 3.1 9.0 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Magnesium M ug/gug/g 14000 50 3071387 14000 12000 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn Ug/gUg/g 200 1.0 3071387 210 560 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Molybdenum Mo ug/gug/g ND 0.50 3071387 ND ND 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni ug/gug/g 3.2 0.50 3071387 3.4 12 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P ug/gug/g 1600 50 3071387 850 810 50 3071865 Acid Extractable Potassium K ug/gug/g ND 200 3071387 ND 750 200 3071865 Acid Extractable Selenium Se ug/gug/g ND 0.50 3071387 ND ND 0.50 3071865 Acid Extractable Silver A ug/gug/g ND 0.20 3071387 ND ND 0.20 3071865 Acid Extractable Sodium Na Ug/gUg/g ND 100 3071387 ND 120 100 3071865 Acid Extractable Strontium Sr u / 95 1.0 3071387 96 92 1.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) ug/gug/g ND 5.0 3071387 ND ND 5.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Uranium U ug/gug/g 0.49 0.050 3071387 0.32 0.35 0.050 3071865 Acid Extractable Vanadium V ug/gug/g 28 5.0 3071387 6.8 17 5.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn ug/gug/g 34 5.0 3071387 19 51 5.0 3071865 Acid Extractable Mercury H u/quq/q ND 0.050 3071387 ND ND 0.050 3071865 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 6 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC -MS (SOIL) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1486 PX1487 I PX1488 PX1489 PX1490 PX1491 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 Units I SED4-1 I RDL SED5-1 SED6-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 I SED9-1 I RDL I QC Batch Pol aromatic Hydrocarbon Acenaphthene ug/q ug/q ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Acenaphthylene uq/q u/q ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Anthracene uq/q u/q ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Benzo(a)anthracene uq/q u/q 0.012 0.010 ND ND ND ND 0.0071 0.0050 3067651 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/g ug/g ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND 0.0063 0.0050 3067651 Benzo b/' fluoranthene uq/q u/q 0.016 0.010 ND ND ND ND 0.011 0.0050 3067651 Benzo ,h,i er lene ug/g ug/g ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND 0.0059 0.0050 3067651 Benzo k fluoranthene ug/q_ ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Chr sene uq/q u/q 0.014 0.010 ND ND ND ND 0.0095 0.0050 3067651 Dibenz a,h anthracene ug/g ug/g ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Fluoranthene ug/g ug/g 0.031 0.010 0.0099 0.0062 ND ND 0.018 0.0050 3067651 Fluorene ug/g ug/g ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene ug/g ug/g ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND 0.0060 0.0050 3067651 1 -Methylnaphthalene uq/q u/q ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 2 -Methylnaphthalene ug/g ug/g ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND 0.0052 0.0050 3067651 Naphthalene ug/g ug/g ND 0.010 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Phenanthrene ug/g ug/g 0.013 0.010 0.0063 0.0076 ND ND 0.0073 0.0050 3067651 Pyrene uq/q u/q 0.026 0.010 0.0081 0.0072 ND ND 0.015 0.0050 3067651 Surrogate Recover D10 -Anthracene % 99 105 90 91 87 93 3067651 D14 -Ter hen FS % 85 89 80 79 76 86 3067651 D8 -Acenaphthylene I % 90 96 80 80 75 80 3067651 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 7 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SOIL) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1487 PX1489 PX1490 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 Units SED5-1 SED7-1 I SED8-1 RDL QC Batch Pesticides & Herbicides Aldrin ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 a -Chlordane ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Chlordane ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Chlordane Total ug/gug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDD ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 p,p-DDD uq/q u/q ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDD + -DDD ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDE ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 p,p-DDE ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDE + -DDE ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDT ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 p,p-DDT uq/q u/q ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDT + -DDT ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 DDT+ Metabolites ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Dieldrin ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Lindane ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Endosulfan I (alpha) ug/gug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Endosulfan II ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Total Endosulfan uq/q u/q ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Endrin ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Heptachlor ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Heptachlor epoxide ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Hexachlorobenzene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Methoxychlor uq/q u/q ND ND ND 0.0050 3068147 Aroclor 1016 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1221 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1232 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1242 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1248 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1254 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1260 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1262 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1268 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 Total PCB ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.015 3068147 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 8 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SOIL) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1487 PX1489 PX1490 Sampling Date 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 Units SED5-1 SED7-1 SED8-1 RDL QC Batch alpha -BHC ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 beta -BHC ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 delta -BHC ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Endosulfan sulfate ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Endrin aldehyde ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Endrin ketone ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Mirex ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Octachlorost rene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0020 3068147 Toxaphene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.080 3068147 Surrogate Recover 2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-x Iene % 84 81 83 3068147 Decachlorobi hen I % 89 88 92 3068147 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 9 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam ID PX1486 Sample ID SED4-1 Matrix Soil Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069359 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071865 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Viviana Canzonieri Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3067663 N/A 2012/12/12 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller H CaC12 EXTRACT GC/MS 3072248 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kieldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Maxxam ID PX1487 Sample ID SED5-1 Matrix Soil Test Descrintion Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069359 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071387 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Viviana Canzonieri Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3067663 N/A 2012/12/12 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3068147 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller Page 10 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Test Summary success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA H CaC12 EXTRACT 3071943 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Maxxam ID PX1487 Dup Sample ID SED5-1 Matrix Soil Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Maxxam ID PX1488 Collected 2012/12/06 Sample ID SED6-1 Shipped Matrix Soil Received 2012/12/07 Test Descrintion Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069359 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071865 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Viviana Canzonieri Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3067663 N/A 2012/12/12 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller H CaCl2 EXTRACT 3072248 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Page 11 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam ID PX1489 Sample ID SED7-1 Matrix Soil Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069362 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071387 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Viviana Canzonien Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3067663 N/A 2012/12/12 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3068147 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller H CaCl2 EXTRACT 3071985 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Maxxam ID PX1489 Dup Sample ID SED7-1 Matrix Soil Tpst npsrrintinn Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrllmpntntlnn Ratrh FxtrartPd Ana1v7Pd Analvst Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Page 12 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam ID PX1490 Sample ID SED8-1 Matrix Soil Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069359 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071865 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Viviana Canzonieri Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3067663 N/A 2012/12/12 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3068147 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller H CaCl2 EXTRACT 3071943 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Maxxam ID PX1491 Sample ID SED9-1 Matrix Soil Tpst npsrrintinn Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 InstrllmPntntlnn Ratrh FxtrartPd Ana1v7Pd Analvst Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069362 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071865 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Viviana Canzonieri Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3067663 N/A 2012/12/12 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller Page 13 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Test Summary Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA H CaC12 EXTRACT 3071985 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Page 14 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Package 1 1 2.0°C Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt GENERAL COMMENTS Sample PX1486-01: PAH Analysis: Detection limits were adjusted for high moisture content. F2 -F4 Analysis: Detection limits were adjusted for high moisture content. Page 15 of 22 success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 16 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3067651 D10 -Anthracene 2012/12/13 93 50-130 85 50-130 96 % 3067651 D14 -Ter hen FS 2012/12/13 82 50-130 84 50-130 94 % 3067651 D8 -Acenaphthylene 2012/12/13 85 50-130 84 50-130 76 % 3067651 Acenaphthene 2012/12/12 83 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/12 90 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uqlq u/q NC 40 3067651 Anthracene 2012/12/12 96 50-130 97 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/12 102 50-130 97 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/12 89 50-130 103 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo b/' fluoranthene 2012/12/12 82 50-130 76 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo ,h,i a lene 2012/12/12 80 50-130 77 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ua/a u/a NC 40 3067651 Benzo k fluoranthene 2012/12/12 79 50-130 68 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Chrysene 2012/12/12 93 50-130 115 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Dibenz a h anthracene 2012/12/12 76 50-130 70 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Fluoranthene 2012/12/12 87 50-130 84 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3067651 Fluorene 2012/12/12 88 50-130 87 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Indeno 1 2 3 -cd rene 2012/12/12 84 50-130 80 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq1q NC 40 3067651 1 -Meth Ina hthalene 2012/12/12 75 50-130 79 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/12 73 50-130 76 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3067651 Naphthalene 2012/12/12 77 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Phenanthrene 2012/12/12 85 50-130 88 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Pyrene 2012/12/12 89 50-130 93 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/CI U/CI NC 40 3067663 Moisture 2012/12/12 4.3 20 3068147 2,4,56-Tetrach1oro-m-x lene 2012/12/13 84 50 - 130 80 50 - 130 85 % 3068147 Decachlorobi hen I 2012/12/13 98 50-130 85 50-130 92 3068147 Aldrin 2012/12/13 90 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / NC 40 3068147 a -Chlordane 2012/12/13 106 50-130 85 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/o ug/o NC 40 3068147 -Chlordane 2012/12/13 101 50-130 80 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3068147 o, -DDD 2012/12/13 110 50-130 87 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3068147 -DDD 2012/12/13 118 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3068147 o, -DDE 2012/12/13 108 50-130 96 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3068147 -DDE 2012/12/13 NC(1) 50-130 100 50-130 ND RDL=0.0020 Uq/C U/C 12.5 40 3068147 o, -DDT 2012/12/13 115 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq1q NC 40 3068147 -DDT 2012/12/13 153(2,3) 50-130 88 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/C U/C NC 40 3068147 Dieldrin 2012/12/13 113 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Lindane 2012/12/13 89 50-130 74 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/c ug/c NC 40 3068147 Endosulfan I (alpha) 2012/12/13 111 50-130 88 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3068147 Endosulfan II 2012/12/13 95 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uqlq u/q NC 40 3068147 Endrin 2012/12/13 107 50-130 83 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Heptachlor 2012/12/13 93 50-130 84 50-130 ND RDL=0.0020 u / NC 40 3068147 He tachlore oxide 2012/12/13 97 50-130 81 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u /qd NC 40 Page 16 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 17 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3068147 Hexachlorobenzene 2012/12/13 88 50-130 77 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Methoxychlor 2012/12/13 97 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uq/g u/g NC 40 3068147 alpha -BHC 2012/12/13 91 30-130 82 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 beta -BHC 2012/12/13 98 30-130 78 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 delta -BHC 2012/12/13 96 30-130 78 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Endosulfan sulfate 2012/12/13 94 1 30-130 88 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Endrin aldehyde 2012/12/13 109 30-130 109 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Endrin ketone 2012/12/13 99 30-130 80 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Mirex 2012/12/13 110 30-130 102 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Octachlorost rene 2012/12/13 96 30-130 88 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1242 2012/12/13 ND RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Total PCB 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Toxaphene 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.080 ug/g ug/g NC 50 3068147 Chlordane Total 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3068147 o, -DDD+ -DDD 2012/12/13 ND,RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 0 -DDE+ -DDE 2012/12/13 ND,RDL=0.0020 ug/q ug/q 12.5 40 3068147 o, -DDT+ -DDT 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 DDT+Metabolites 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Total Endosulfan 2012/12/13 ND RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Aroclor 1016 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1221 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1232 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1248 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/g u/g NC 40 3068147 JAroclor 1254 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Aroclor 1260 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Aroclor 1262 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1268 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3069359 Chromium VI 2012/12/14 84 75-125 94 80-120 ND, RDL=0.2 uq/q u/q NC 35 95 75-125 3069362 Chromium VI 2012/12/14 0(2,4) 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.2 uq/q u/q 6.5 35 96 75-125 3069614 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2012/12/14 102 60-140 101 60-140 100 % 3069614 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/12/14 109 60-140 108 60-140 107 % 3069614 D10-Eth (benzene 2012/12/14 83 60-140 80 60-140 81 % 3069614 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2012/12/14 96 60-140 93 60-140 95 % 3069614 Benzene 2012/12/14 85 60-140 101 60-130 ND, RDL=0.005 ug/g ug/g NC 50 3069614 Toluene 2012/12/14 70 60-140 85 60-130 ND, RDL=0.02 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 Eth (benzene 2012/12/14 76 60-140 94 60-130 ND, RDL=0.01 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 o -X lene 2012/12/14 70 60-140 87 60-130 ND, RDL=0.02 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 +m -X lene 2012/12/14 66 60-140 82 60-130 ND, RDL=0.04 ug/q ug/q NC 50 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 2012/12/14 75 60-140 94 80-120 ND RDL=10 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 Total Xylenes 2012/12/14 ND, RDL=0.04 uq/q u/q NC 50 Page 17 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 18 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX 2012/12/14 ND, RDL=10 Uq/q U/q NC 50 3069865 Total Ammonia -N 2012/12/18 107 75-125 111 80-120 ND, RDL=25 Uq/g U/g 3.1 35 3070999 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 ND RDL=10 Uq/g U/g 4.9 40 80 75-125 3071104 o -Ter hen I 2012/12/17 95 50-130 94 50-130 94 % 3071104 1`2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/17 97 50-130 95 80-120 ND, RDL=10 Uq1q NC 30 3071104 F3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/17 101 50-130 100 80-120 ND, RDL=10 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071104 F4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/17 100 50-130 97 80-120 ND RDL=10 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Aluminum AI 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 103 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Antimony Sb 2012/12/17 100 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Arsenic As 2012/12/17 102 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071387 lAcid Extractable Barium Ba 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 6.4 30 3071387 JAcid Extractable Beryllium Be 2012/12/17 106 75-125 103 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd 2012/12/17 104 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 102 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Chromium Cr 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 Uq/g U/g 14.9 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co 2012/12/17 96 75-125 94 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 uq/q u/q 5.8 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Copper Cu 2012/12/17 99 75-125 96 80-120 0.54 RDL=0.50 Uq1CI 4.8 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Iron Fe 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 110 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Lead Pb 2012/12/17 98 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 Uq/q U/q 3.5 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Magnesium M 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 101 80-120 ND RDL=50 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Molybdenum Mo 2012/12/17 101 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni 2012/12/17 102 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 Uq/q U/q 4.2 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 115 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3071387 JAcid Extractable Potassium K 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 92 80-120 ND, RDL=200 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Selenium Se 2012/12/17 103 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Silver A 2012/12/17 103 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Sodium Na 2012/12/17 101 75-125 96 80-120 ND, RDL=100 Ua/cl 3071387 Acid Extractable Strontium Sr 2012/12/17 105 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Thallium TI 2012/12/17 89 75-125 91 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) 2012/12/17 104 75-125 101 80-120 ND RDL=5.0 u / 3071387 Acid Extractable Uranium U 2012/12/17 103 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 ug/g ug/g 7.4 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Vanadium V 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 uq/q u/q 5.5 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 uq/q u/q 5.5 30 3071387 Acid Extractable Mercury H 2012/12/17 107 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 Uq/g U/g NC 30 3071739 Acid Extractable Thallium TI 2012/12/17 97 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.05 Uq/q U/q NC 35 3071739 Acid Extractable Tungsten W 2012/12/17 ND, RDL=1 ug/g ug/g NC 35 3071739 Acid Extractable Zirconium Zr 2012/12/17 ND, RDL=1 / u2/9 NC 35 3071858 Fluoride F- 2012/12/17 104 80-120 107 80-120 ND RDL=5 u / NC 25 3071860 Soluble 20:1 Chloride CI 2012/12/18 103 75 - 125 103 75 - 125 ND, RDL=20 u / NC 35 Page 18 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 19 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free= 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3071861 Nitrite N 2012/12/17 110 75-125 108 75-125 ND, RDL=0.5 Uq/q U/q NC 25 3071861 Nitrate N 2012/12/17 109 75-125 108 75-125 ND, RDL=2 Uq/g U/g NC 25 3071861 Nitrate + Nitrite 2012/12/17 109 75-125 108 75-125 ND RDL=3 Uq/g U/g NC 25 3071862 Soluble 20:1 Sulphate SO4 2012/12/18 100 75-125 105 75-125 ND, RDL=20 Uq/q U/q NC 35 3071865 Acid Extractable Aluminum(Al)2012/12/17 105 75-125 103 80-120 ND RDL=50 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Antimony Sb 2012/12/17 99 75-125 96 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Arsenic As 2012/12/17 100 75-125 98 80-120 ND RDL=1.0 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Barium Ba 2012/12/17 98 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 3.5 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Beryllium Be 2012/12/17 104 75-125 104 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd 2012/12/17 102 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 106 80-120 ND RDL=50 u / 3071865 JAcid Extractable Chromium Cr 2012/12/17 100 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 Uq1q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co 2012/12/17 93 75-125 95 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Copper Cu 2012/12/17 94 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Iron Fe 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 109 80-120 ND RDL=50 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Lead Pb 2012/12/17 93 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 Ua/a U/a NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Magnesium M 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 102 80-120 ND RDL=50 Ua/cl 3071865 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Molybdenum Mo 2012/12/17 104 75-125 99 80-120 ND RDL=0.50 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni 2012/12/17 99 75-125 102 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 0.3 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 116 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Potassium K 2012/12/17 94 75-125 93 80-120 ND, RDL=200 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Selenium Se 2012/12/17 99 75-125 98 80-120 ND RDL=0.50 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Silver A 2012/12/17 100 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071865 JAcid Extractable Sodium Na 2012/12/17 102 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=100 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Strontium Sr 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 96 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Thallium TI 2012/12/17 86 75-125 91 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) 2012/12/17 103 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 u / 3071865 Acid Extractable Uranium U 2012/12/17 98 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 uqlq u/q 6.0 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Vanadium V 2012/12/17 102 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071865 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn 2012/12/17 95 75-125 112 80-120 ND RDL=5.0 uq/q u/q NC 30 Page 19 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free= 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit RPD = Relative Percent Difference Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. QC Standard: A sample of known concentration prepared by an external agency under stringent conditions. Used as an independent check of method accuracy. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. (1) -The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated (INC). Because of the high concentration of this analyte in the parent sample, the relative difference between the spiked and unspiked concentrations is not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. (2) - Recovery or RPD for this parameter is outside control limits. The overall quality control for this analysis meets acceptability criteria. (3) - The recovery was above the upper control limit. This may represent a high bias in some results for this specific analyte. For results that were not detected (ND), this potential bias has no impact. (4) - The matrix spike recovery was below the lower control limit. This may be due in part to the reducing environment of the sample. Page 20 of 22 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA El ?_<5 El r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job M B2J3687 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Cha4@4 Afecle"r, W.', M.Sc., C.Chem, Senior Analyst 04c'0� cztr, L Cristina Carriere, Scientific Services E,rae Pr-ai tjfe �: Ewa Pranjic, , Scientific Specialist sj� Jeevaraj Jeevaratrnam, Senior Analyst Page 21 of 22 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NI El ?_<5 E] r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). n r el 1 S Medhat Riskallah, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department Altl�� Yuan h , gc\tns Technician Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5. 10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 22 of 22 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca S, V I al a M 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, ON L5N 2L8 Phone: 905-817-5700 Fax: 905-817-5779 Toll Free; (800) 563-6266 CHAN" SOF CUSTC ( RECORD 88222 Page —/Of INVOICE INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION (if differs from invoice) PROJECT INFORMATION MAXXAM JOB NUMBER Company Name: '` ifc¢� r �rr�- yY� , i Z�r Company Name: /A)—VGTi C 1 Quotation #: / Contact. Name; t it' i� e 'S mo i' Contact Name: P.O.#; .r Address Address: Project �� CHAIN OF CUSTODY p _ Site Location: r f` r �y Phoned �t 'G "Fax:Z� }([+ J i 2L la rte' Phone: Fax: F _ Site [ Sampled By: 7 OO Email: Lt ° Fi' q� ' f Email *-Note: For MUE Regulated Drinking Water samples, please use the Drinking Water Co10*** ANALYSI QUESTED (PleiUe be specific) TURNAROUND TIME (TAT) REQUIRED Regulation 153 (2011) Other Regulations g `' ' '' ' Table 1 Res/Park Mrd/Fine CCME�(� Sanitary Sewer Bylaw Regular {Standard) TAT:? Tablet 2 ndlCgmm Coarse Reg, 558 Storm Sewer v I 1 5-7 working days for mast tests D Y } Tabl-3 Agri/Oilier For RSC IVIISA roluniclpality �' < `'1 '\ �. Rush TAT: Table es PWQQ �1 t� . '1 Samples must be received by Spm to guaramee your TAT""' .� ENo .19 Qthar (specify): n � !y �* v � h V1 v � � J � Rush Confirmation # PN�_ 1 clay 2 days 3 days ❑ �� � Include Criteria on Certificate of Analysis (YIN)? 2 » .,SAMPLES 0: O - m. m Nkont. ,. I U I 11 1 Date Rea MUST BE KEPT COOL SAMPLING UNTIL (<10*C) FROM TIME OF ifs are > 5 days. Poease contact your Project Manager for details 'TATs for certain ted Sample entification Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix (Gw, sw, soli, sic.) °f COMMENTS / TAT COMMENTS 2 % 1% l AID h c 65 1161VotPct 4 5D y� 6 5 '/ _ v .� / 7 -Den -1214;19 e Al Renata Spena B2J3687 a f RDV ENV -692 ; 9 10 "RELINQUISHED BY (S'gnature/Print) Date (YYYY MM DD) Time: RECEIVED BY: (Signature/Print) Date (YM/MM/DD) Time: WARS USED AND NOT SUBMITTED fir Laboratory Use Only L 1 zit f L Custody',Temperature Seal Yes No C on Receipt p (� 1 p �C Y � Present / 3 Intact L *MANDATORY SECTIONS IN GREY MUST BE FILLED.OUL AN INCOMPLETE CHAIN OF CUSTODY MAY RESULT IN ANALYTICAL TAT DELAYS. COC -1004 (06112) - ENV. ENG, Maxxam Analytics International Corporation cla Maxxam Analytics White: Maxxam Yellow: Mall Pink: Client t6 Maxam Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Maxxam Sample: PX1486 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED4-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram FID'1 "DEC14A'�048F�,;,"�-il.D"" P:I 14 1 a � ISS C- s=` �'_' �.lL LL � -1 LL LL � C7 -J r r 14 1 1 11-1 rfl Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Maxxam Sample: PX1487 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED5-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram FID I _CDE`14.°.04--1FV,1.C,.' P:I 14, r. rw� 1' a hil+ LX LL C�1 - -- l+ 14 1 13 1 r� Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Maam Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Report Date: 2012/12/19 Client Project #: CB664.00 Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Maxxam Sample: PX1487 Lab-Dup Client ID: SED5-1 FID P" no l a■ 6 A 4� n. Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram L3 Lr--. LL � Etig f3 14 1 13 11-1 r� Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Maxxam Sample: PX1488 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED6-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram FID P:I 14 1 a r LL L Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Maxam Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Maxxam Sample: PX1489 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED7-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram FID'1:"DEC14A`.CH4- F5901.D) P" no hl�A 4� n. LrP Com! C 7 LL LL LL ` ' ] .M1 C= + rV Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Maxam Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Maxxam Sample: PX1490 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED8-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram FID '1:"DEC14A`.005F 001.D) P:.. r a M E---% C4 m L C=3- l+ 14 1 13 11-1 r� Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3687 Maxxam Sample: PX1491 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED9-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. FI C,1 1= 1,E,"�14.4'..00I3,F13, 1 C -11.D) P 1 4C4 I� 14 1 13 11-1 r� Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Your Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Your C.O.C. #: na Attention: Geoff Lussier Terrapex Environmental Ltd 49 Coldwater Rd Toronto, ON M3B 1Y8 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: B302993 Received: 2013/01/08, 17:53 Sample Matrix: Soil # Samples Received: 4 Success Through Science - Report Date: 2013/01/11 Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Hot Water Extractable Boron 4 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 CAM SOP -00408 R153 Ana. Prot. 2011 Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. " RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. • Results relate only to the items tested. Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Ema Gitej, Project Manager Email: EGitej@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700 Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 1 Page 1 of 6 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ir/I E 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B302993 Report Date: 2013/01/11 ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID QE1707 QE1708 QE1709 QE1710 Sampling Date 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 2012/11/20 Units I MW101-1C MW102-1C MW102-1F MW103-16 I RDL QC Batch Metals Hot Water Ext. Boron B ug/gug/g 0.054 ND ND ND 0.050 3091420 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 2 of 6 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Success Through Science- Maxxam ID QE1708 Sample ID MW102-1C Matrix Soil Collected 2012/11/20 Shipped Received 2013/01/08 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hot Water Extractable Boron ICP 3091420 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 Azita Fazaeli Maxxam ID QE1709 Sample ID MW102-1F Matrix Soil Collected 2012/11/20 Shipped Received 2013/01/08 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hot Water Extractable Boron ICP 3091420 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 Azita Fazaeli Maxxam ID QE1710 Sample ID MW103-16 Matrix Soil Collected 2012/11/20 Shipped Received 2013/01/08 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hot Water Extractable Boron ICP 3091420 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 Azita Fazaeli Page 3 of 6 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam AnalVtics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Terrapex Environmental Ltd Maxxam Job #: B302993 Client Project #: CB664.00 Report Date: 2013/01/11 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Test Summary Maxxam ID QE1707 Collected 2012/11/20 Sample ID MW101-1C Shipped Matrix Soil Received 2013/01/08 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hot Water Extractable Boron ICP 3091420 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 Azita Fazaeli Maxxam ID QE1708 Sample ID MW102-1C Matrix Soil Collected 2012/11/20 Shipped Received 2013/01/08 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hot Water Extractable Boron ICP 3091420 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 Azita Fazaeli Maxxam ID QE1709 Sample ID MW102-1F Matrix Soil Collected 2012/11/20 Shipped Received 2013/01/08 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hot Water Extractable Boron ICP 3091420 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 Azita Fazaeli Maxxam ID QE1710 Sample ID MW103-16 Matrix Soil Collected 2012/11/20 Shipped Received 2013/01/08 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hot Water Extractable Boron ICP 3091420 2013/01/11 2013/01/11 Azita Fazaeli Page 3 of 6 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam AnalVtics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B302993 Report Date: 2013/01/11 GENERAL COMMENTS Page 4 of 6 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Maxxam Job #: B302993 Report Date: 2013/01/11 QC Batch 3091420 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Hot Water Ext. Boron (B) 1 2013/01/11 1 98 Blank Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Method Blank 75-125 1 ND, RDL=0.050 N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Page 5 of 6 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a i/laxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA El ?_<5 E] r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job M B302993 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). 04c'0� cztr, L Cristina Carriere, Scientific Services Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5. 10.2 of ISOJEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 6 of 6 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Your Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Your C.O.C. #: 88232 Attention: Geoff Lussier Terrapex Environmental Ltd 49 Coldwater Rd Toronto, ON M3B 1Y8 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: B2J3659 Received: 2012/12/07, 14:49 Sample Matrix: SEDIMENT # Samples Received: 3 Success Through Science - Report Date: 2012/12/19 Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. Results relate only to the items tested. Page 1 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Chloride (20:1 extract) 3 N/A 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00463 EPA 325.2 Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC (1) 3 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 CAM SOP -00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 3 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 CAM SOP -00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil 3 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00316 CCME CWS Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil 3 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00448 APHA 4500FC Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS 3 2012/12/15 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS 3 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Moisture 1 N/A 2012/12/12 CAM SOP -00445 R.Carter,1993 Moisture 2 N/A 2012/12/13 CAM SOP -00445 R.Carter,1993 Ammonia -N 3 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00441 Carter, SS&A Nitrate (NO3) and Nitrite (NO2) in Soil 3 N/A 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00440 SM 4500 N031/NO2B OC Pesticides (Selected) & PCB (2) 3 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 CAM SOP -00307 SW846 8081, 8082 PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM) 3 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 CAM SOP - 00318 EPA 8270 pH CaC12 EXTRACT 3 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00413 SM 4500H+ B Sulphate (20:1 Extract) 3 N/A 2012/12/18 CAM SOP -00464 EPA 375.4 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen - Soil 3 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 CAM SOP -00454 EPA 351.2 Rev 2 Total Organic Carbon in Soil 3 N/A 2012/12/19 CAM SOP -00468 LECO Combustion Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. Results relate only to the items tested. Page 1 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca (1) Soils are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified. (2) Chlordane ( Total) = Alpha Chlordane + Gamma Chlordane Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Maryam Arghandeh, Email: mArghand@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 1 Page 2 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 CCME PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1368 PX1369 PX1369 PX1370 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 Units I SED1-3 I SED2-3 SED2-3 Lab-Dup QC Batch SED3-2 I RDL QC Batch Inorganics Moisture % 23 25 3068403 17 1.0 3067663 BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons Benzene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 0.005 3069614 Toluene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 0.02 3069614 Eth (benzene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 0.01 3069614 o -X lene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 0.02 3069614 +m -X lene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 0.04 3069614 Total Xylenes Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 0.04 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 Ug/gUg/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 10 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 3069614 ND 10 3069614 F2 -F4 Hydrocarbons F2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) ug/gug/g ND ND 3071104 ND 10 3071104 F3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) ug/gug/g 69 59 3071104 42 10 3071104 F4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) ug/gug/g ND ND 3071104 ND 10 3071104 Reached Baseline at C50 ug/g ug/g YES YES 3071104 YES 3071104 Surrogate Recover 1,4-Difluorobenzene % 99 100 99 3069614 99 3069614 4-Bromofluorobenzene % 108 108 107 3069614 108 3069614 D10-Eth (benzene % 80 80 79 3069614 75 3069614 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 94 94 94 3069614 94 3069614 o -Ter hen I % 96 94 3071104 97 3071104 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 3 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SEDIMENT Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID I PX1368 I PX1368 I PX1369 I I PX1370 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 1 12012/12/06 Units SE131-3 SED1-3 Lab -Du QC Batch SE132-3 RDL SED3-2 RDL ffQCatch Inorganics Total Ammonia -N ug/g ug/g 252 260 3069865 197 25 184(1) 25 3069865 Soluble 20:1 Chloride(Cl)ug/g ug/g 23 3071860 ND 20 ND 20 3071860 Chromium VI ug/gug/g ND 3069359 ND 0.2 ND 0.2 3069362 Fluoride F- ug/gug/g ND 3071858 5 5 ND 5 3071858 Total Organic Carbon rng/kg 14000 3074027 12000 500 9500 500 3074027 Available CaC12 H H 7.45 3071985 7.47 7.75 3071985 Soluble 20:1 Sulphate SO4 ug/gug/g ND 3071862 ND 20 71 20 3071862 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen u /q 1490 1420 3070999 1010 50 177(1) 10 3070999 Nitrite N ug/gug/g ND 3071861 ND 0.5 ND 0.5 3071861 Nitrate N ug/gug/g ND 3071861 ND 2 ND 2 3071861 Nitrate + Nitrite ug/g ug/g ND 3071861 ND 3 ND 3 3071861 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch (1) - TKN < NH4: Both values fall within acceptable RPD limits for duplicates and are likely equivalent. Page 4 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1368 PX1369 PX1370 PX1370 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 2012/12/06 Units I SED1-3 SE132-3 I SED3-2 I SED3-2 Lab-Dup RDL QC Batch Metals Acid Extractable Thallium TI ug/gug/g 0.064 0.072 ND ND 0.050 3071164 Acid Extractable Tungsten W ug/gug/g ND ND ND 1 3071739 Acid Extractable Zirconium Zr ug/g 5 5 2 1 3071739 Acid Extractable Aluminum(Al)ug/g ug/g 7600 7100 2500 2600 50 3071164 Acid Extractable Antimony Sb ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3071164 Acid Extractable Arsenic As ug/gug/g 3.5 3.6 1.9 2.2 1.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Barium Ba ug/gug/g 55 53 15 17 0.50 3071164 Acid Extractable Beryllium Be ug/gug/g 0.39 0.38 ND ND 0.20 3071164 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd ug/gug/g 0.20 0.17 ND ND 0.10 3071164 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca ug/gug/g 68000 77000 85000 94000 50 3071164 Acid Extractable Chromium Cr ug/gug/g 13 12 5.0 5.3 1.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co ug/gug/g 5.9 6.2 2.7 2.9 0.10 3071164 Acid Extractable Copper Cu u/quqlq 16 17 11 10 0.50 3071164 Acid Extractable Iron Fe ug/gug/g 16000 16000 7800 8400 50 3071164 Acid Extractable Lead Pb ug/gug/g 14 12 4.2 4.4 1.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Magnesium M ug/gug/g 14000 15000 19000 20000 50 3071164 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn ug/gug/g 540 590 420 440 1.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Molybdenum Mo ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.50 3071164 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni ug/gug/g 12 13 5.6 5.9 0.50 3071164 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P ug/gug/g 960 860 670 710 50 3071164 Acid Extractable Potassium K ug/gug/g 710 750 330 340 200 3071164 Acid Extractable Selenium Se ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.50 3071164 Acid Extractable Silver A ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3071164 Acid Extractable Sodium Na ug/gug/g ND 110 110 110 100 3071164 Acid Extractable Strontium Sr ug/gug/g 93 110 110 120 1.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 5.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Uranium U ug/gug/g 0.44 0.42 0.32 0.34 0.050 3071164 Acid Extractable Vanadium V ug/gug/g 19 18 9.0 9.3 5.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn ug/gug/g 56 52 25 24 5.0 3071164 Acid Extractable Mercury H ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.050 3071164 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 5 of 18 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC -MS (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1368 PX1369 PX1370 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 Units SE131-3 SED2-3 I SED3-2 I RDL QC Batch Pol aromatic Hydrocarbon Acenaphthene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Acenaphthylene ug/g ug/g ND 0.0080 ND 0.0050 3067651 Anthracene ug/g ug/g 0.0068 0.013 ND 0.0050 3067651 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/g ug/g 0.025 0.045 0.012 0.0050 3067651 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/g ug/g 0.020 0.034 0.010 0.0050 3067651 Benzo b/' fluoranthene ug/g ug/g 0.026 0.045 0.015 0.0050 3067651 Benzo ,h,i er lene ug/g ug/g 0.012 0.021 0.0075 0.0050 3067651 Benzo k fluoranthene ug/g ug/g 0.0098 0.017 0.0059 0.0050 3067651 Chr sene ug/g ug/g 0.021 0.043 0.016 0.0050 3067651 Dibenz a,h anthracene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Fluoranthene ug/g ug/g 0.055 0.10 0.036 0.0050 3067651 Fluorene uq/q u/q 0.0055 0.0093 ND 0.0050 3067651 Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene ug/g ug/g 0.014 0.025 0.0078 0.0050 3067651 1 -Methylnaphthalene ug/g ug/g ND 0.0066 ND 0.0050 3067651 2 -Methylnaphthalene ug/g ug/g 0.0051 0.011 ND 0.0050 3067651 Naphthalene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND 0.0050 3067651 Phenanthrene ug/g ug/g 0.034 0.066 0.022 0.0050 3067651 Pyrene ug/g ug/g 0.048 0.086 0.029 0.0050 3067651 Surrogate Recover D10 -Anthracene % 94 100 96 3067651 D14 -Ter hen FS % 86 88 83 3067651 D8 -Acenaphthylene % 81 90 87 3067651 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 6 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1368 PX1369 PX1370 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 Units I SED1-3 I RDL SE132-3 RDL I SED3-2 I RDL QC Batch Pesticides & Herbicides Aldrin Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 a -Chlordane Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Chlordane Ug/g Ug/g 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Chlordane Total Ug/gUg/g 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDD Ug/g Ug/g 0.0070 0.0020 0.0080 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 p,p-DDD Ug/g Ug/g 0.021 0.0020 0.022 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDD + -DDD Ug/g Ug/g 0.028 0.0020 0.030 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDE Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 p,p-DDE Ug/g Ug/g 0.033 0.0020 0.035 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDE + -DDE Ug/g Ug/g 0.033 0.0020 0.035 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDT ug/g ug/g ND 0.0030 ND 0.0030 ND 0.0020 3068147 p,p-DDT Ug/g Ug/g 0.0060 0.0020 0.0050 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 o, -DDT + -DDT Ug/g Ug/g 0.0060 0.0020 0.0050 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 DDT+ Metabolites Ug/g Ug/g 0.067 0.0030 0.070 0.0030 ND 0.0020 3068147 Dieldrin Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0030 ND 0.0020 3068147 Lindane Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Endosulfan (alpha) Ug/gUg/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Endosulfan II Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Total Endosulfan Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Endrin Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Heptachlor Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Heptachlor epoxide Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Hexachlorobenzene Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Methoxychlor Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.0050 ND 0.0050 ND 0.0050 3068147 Aroclor 1016 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1221 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1232 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1242 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1248 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1254 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1260 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1262 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Aroclor 1268 Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 Total PCB Ug/g Ug/g ND 0.015 ND 0.015 ND 0.015 3068147 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 7 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PX1368 PX1369 PX1370 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 Units SED1-3 RDL SE132-3 RDL SED3-2 RDL QC Batch alpha -BHC Uq/g U/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 beta -BHC ug/g ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 delta -BHC ug/g ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Endosulfan sulfate ug/g ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Endrin aldehyde ug/g ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Endrin ketone ug/g ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Mirex ug/g ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Octachlorost rene ug/g ug/g ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 ND 0.0020 3068147 Toxaphene ug/g ug/g ND 0.080 ND 0.080 ND 0.080 3068147 Surrogate Recover 2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-x Iene % 83 81 81 3068147 Decachlorobi hen I % 84 82 88 3068147 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 8 of 18 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam ID PX1368 Sample ID SED1-3 Matrix SEDIMENT Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069359 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071164 2012/12/15 2012/12/18 Viviana Canzonien Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3068403 N/A 2012/12/13 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3068147 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller H CaCl2 EXTRACT 3071985 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Maxxam ID PX1368 Dup Collected 2012/12/05 Sample ID SED1-3 Shipped Matrix SEDIMENT Received 2012/12/07 (Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu I Page 9 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam ID PX1369 Sample ID SED2-3 Matrix SEDIMENT Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069362 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071164 2012/12/15 2012/12/18 Viviana Canzonien Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3068403 N/A 2012/12/13 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3068147 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller H CaCl2 EXTRACT 3071985 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Maxxam ID PX1369 Dup Sample ID SED2-3 Matrix SEDIMENT Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Page 10 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam ID PX1370 Sample ID SED3-2 Matrix SEDIMENT Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3071860 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3069362 2012/12/13 2012/12/14 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3069614 2012/12/10 2012/12/14 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3071104 2012/12/15 2012/12/17 Kent Maolin Li Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3071858 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Yo esh Patel Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071164 2012/12/15 2012/12/18 Viviana Canzonieri Acid Extractable Metals by ICPMS ICP1/MS 3071739 2012/12/17 2012/12/17 Hua Ren Moisture BAL 3067663 N/A 2012/12/12 Valentina Kaftani Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3069865 2012/12/14 2012/12/18 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3071861 N/A 2012/12/17 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3068147 2012/12/13 2012/12/13 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3067651 2012/12/12 2012/12/13 Darryl Tiller H CaCl2 EXTRACT 3071985 2012/12/17 2012/12/18 Neil Dassana ake Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3071862 N/A 2012/12/18 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kmeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3070999 2012/12/14 2012/12/17 Anastasia Hamanov Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3074027 N/A 2012/12/19 Godwin Okereke Maxxam ID PX1370 Dup Sample ID SED3-2 Matrix SEDIMENT Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/07 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3071164 2012/12/15 2012/12/18 Viviana Canzonieri Page 11 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 Package 1 1 2.0°C Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA GENERAL COMMENTS Sample PX1368-01: OC Pesticide Analysis: Detection Limits were raised due to matrix interferences. Sample PX1369-01: OC Pesticide Analysis: Detection Limits were raised due to matrix interferences. Page 12 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 13 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3067651 D10 -Anthracene 2012/12/13 93 50-130 85 50-130 96 % 3067651 D14 -Ter hen FS 2012/12/13 82 50-130 84 50-130 94 % 3067651 D8 -Acenaphthylene 2012/12/13 85 50-130 84 50-130 76 % 3067651 Acenaphthene 2012/12/12 83 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/12 90 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uqlq u/q NC 40 3067651 Anthracene 2012/12/12 96 50-130 97 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/12 102 50-130 97 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/12 89 50-130 103 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo b/' fluoranthene 2012/12/12 82 50-130 76 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Benzo ,h,i a lene 2012/12/12 80 50-130 77 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ua/a u/a NC 40 3067651 Benzo k fluoranthene 2012/12/12 79 50-130 68 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Chrysene 2012/12/12 93 50-130 115 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Dibenz a h anthracene 2012/12/12 76 50-130 70 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Fluoranthene 2012/12/12 87 50-130 84 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3067651 Fluorene 2012/12/12 88 50-130 87 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Indeno 1 2 3 -cd rene 2012/12/12 84 50-130 80 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq1q NC 40 3067651 1 -Meth Ina hthalene 2012/12/12 75 50-130 79 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/12 73 50-130 76 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3067651 Naphthalene 2012/12/12 77 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Phenanthrene 2012/12/12 85 50-130 88 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3067651 Pyrene 2012/12/12 89 50-130 93 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/CI U/CI NC 40 3067663 Moisture 2012/12/12 4.3 20 3068147 2,4,56-Tetrach1oro-m-x lene 2012/12/13 84 50 - 130 80 50 - 130 85 % 3068147 Decachlorobi hen I 2012/12/13 98 50-130 85 50-130 92 3068147 Aldrin 2012/12/13 90 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / NC 40 3068147 a -Chlordane 2012/12/13 106 50-130 85 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/o ug/o NC 40 3068147 -Chlordane 2012/12/13 101 50-130 80 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3068147 o, -DDD 2012/12/13 110 50-130 87 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3068147 -DDD 2012/12/13 118 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3068147 o, -DDE 2012/12/13 108 50-130 96 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3068147 -DDE 2012/12/13 NC(1) 50-130 100 50-130 ND RDL=0.0020 Uq/C U/C 12.5 40 3068147 o, -DDT 2012/12/13 115 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq1q NC 40 3068147 -DDT 2012/12/13 153(2,3) 50-130 88 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/C U/C NC 40 3068147 Dieldrin 2012/12/13 113 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Lindane 2012/12/13 89 50-130 74 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/c ug/c NC 40 3068147 Endosulfan I (alpha) 2012/12/13 111 50-130 88 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3068147 Endosulfan II 2012/12/13 95 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uqlq u/q NC 40 3068147 Endrin 2012/12/13 107 50-130 83 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Heptachlor 2012/12/13 93 50-130 84 50-130 ND RDL=0.0020 u / NC 40 3068147 He tachlore oxide 2012/12/13 97 50-130 81 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u /qd NC 40 Page 13 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 14 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3068147 Hexachlorobenzene 2012/12/13 88 50-130 77 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Methoxychlor 2012/12/13 97 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uq/g u/g NC 40 3068147 alpha -BHC 2012/12/13 91 30-130 82 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 beta -BHC 2012/12/13 98 30-130 78 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 delta -BHC 2012/12/13 96 30-130 78 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Endosulfan sulfate 2012/12/13 94 1 30-130 88 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Endrin aldehyde 2012/12/13 109 30-130 109 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Endrin ketone 2012/12/13 99 30-130 80 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Mirex 2012/12/13 110 30-130 102 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Octachlorost rene 2012/12/13 96 30-130 88 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1242 2012/12/13 ND RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Total PCB 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Toxaphene 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.080 ug/g ug/g NC 50 3068147 Chlordane Total 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3068147 o, -DDD+ -DDD 2012/12/13 ND,RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 0 -DDE+ -DDE 2012/12/13 ND,RDL=0.0020 ug/q ug/q 12.5 40 3068147 o, -DDT+ -DDT 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 DDT+Metabolites 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3068147 Total Endosulfan 2012/12/13 ND RDL=0.0020 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Aroclor 1016 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1221 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1232 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1248 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/g u/g NC 40 3068147 JAroclor 1254 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Aroclor 1260 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 uq/q u/q NC 40 3068147 Aroclor 1262 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068147 Aroclor 1268 2012/12/13 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3068403 Moisture 2012/12/13 1.3 20 3069359 Chromium VI 2012/12/14 84 75-125 94 80-120 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/q ug/q NC 35 95 75-125 3069362 Chromium VI 2012/12/14 0(2,4) 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.2 ug/g ug/g 6.5 35 96 75-125 3069614 1,4- ifluorobenzene 2012/12/14 102 60-140 101 60-140 100 % 3069614 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/12/14 109 60-140 108 60-140 107 % 3069614 D10-Eth (benzene 2012/12/14 83 60-140 80 60-140 81 % 3069614 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2012/12/14 96 60-140 93 60-140 95 % 3069614 Benzene 2012/12/14 85 60-140 101 60-130 ND, RDL=0.005 uq/g u/g NC 50 3069614 Toluene 2012/12/14 70 60-140 85 60-130 ND, RDL=0.02 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 Eth (benzene 2012/12/14 76 60-140 94 60-130 ND, RDL=0.01 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 o -X lene 2012/12/14 70 60-140 87 60-130 ND, RDL=0.02 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 +m -Xylene 2012/12/14 66 60- 140 82 60-130 ND, RDL=0.04 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 2012/12/14 75 60-140 94 80-120 ND, RDL=10 uq/q u/q NC 50 Page 14 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 15 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3069614 Total Xylenes 2012/12/14 ND, RDL=0.04 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069614 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX 2012/12/14 ND, RDL=10 uq/q u/q NC 50 3069865 Total Ammonia -N 2012/12/18 107 75-125 111 80-120 ND RDL=25 uq/q u/q 3.1 35 3070999 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 2012/12/17 NC 75-125 ND, RDL=10 uq/q u/q 4.9 40 80 75-125 3071104 o -Ter hen I 2012/12/17 95 50-130 94 50-130 94 % 3071104 F2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/17 97 50-130 95 80-120 ND, RDL=10 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071104 F3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/17 101 50-130 100 80-120 ND RDL=10 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071104 F4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/17 100 50-130 97 80-120 ND, RDL=10 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Aluminum(Al)2012/12/18 NC 75-125 100 80-120 ND RDL=50 ug/q ug/q 6.4 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Antimon Sb 2012/12/18 101 75-125 104 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071164 lAcid Extractable Arsenic As 2012/12/18 100 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Barium Ba 2012/12/18 107 75-125 106 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 11.4 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Beryllium Be 2012/12/18 103 75-125 96 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd 2012/12/18 100 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca 2012/12/18 NC 75-125 101 80-120 60 RDL=50 uq/q u/q 9.8 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Chromium Cr 2012/12/18 100 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/cl 5.0 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co 2012/12/18 93 75-125 94 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 ug/q ug/q 6.3 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Copper Cu 2012/12/18 92 75-125 96 80-120 0.57, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 6.0 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Iron Fe 2012/12/18 NC 75-125 107 80-120 ND RDL=50 uq/g u/g 7.5 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Lead Pb 2012/12/18 96 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Magnesium M 2012/12/18 NC 75-125 98 80-120 ND RDL=50 uq/q u/q 6.1 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn 2012/12/18 NC 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/cl 5.3 30 3071164 lAcid Extractable Molybdenum Mo 2012/12/18 103 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/g u/g NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni 2012/12/18 94 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 5.4 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P 2012/12/18 NC 75-125 103 80-120 ND, RDL=50 ug/q ug/q 6.6 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Potassium K 2012/12/18 99 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=200 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Selenium Se 2012/12/18 97 75-125 96 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Silver A 2012/12/18 101 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Sodium Na 2012/12/18 98 75-125 95 80-120 ND, RDL=100 uq/q u/q NC 30 3071164 JAcid Extractable Strontium Sr 2012/12/18 NC 75-125 102 80-120 1 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/q u/q 4.6 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Thallium TI 2012/12/18 89 75-125 87 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 uq/g u/g NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) 2012/12/18 103 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 ua/a u/a NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Uranium U 2012/12/18 99 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 ug/g ug/g 6.5 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Vanadium V 2012/12/18 99 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 ug/q ug/q NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn 2012/12/18 NC 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3071164 Acid Extractable Mercury H 2012/12/18 94 75-125 120 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3071739 Acid Extractable Thallium TI 2012/12/17 97 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.05 uqlq u/q NC 35 3071739 Acid Extractable Tungsten W 2012/12/17 ND, RDL=1 uq/q u/q NC 35 3071739 Acid Extractable Zirconium Zr 2012/12/17 ND RDL=1 uq/g u/g NC 35 3071858 Fluoride F- 2012/12/17 104 80-120 107 80-120 ND, RDL=5 uq/q u/q NC 25 Page 15 of 18 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NAS _ E] V" Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Report Date: 2012/12/19 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit RPD = Relative Percent Difference Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. QC Standard: A sample of known concentration prepared by an external agency under stringent conditions. Used as an independent check of method accuracy. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. (1) -The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated (NC). Because of the high concentration of this analyte in the parent sample, the relative difference between the spiked and unspiked concentrations is not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. (2) - Recovery or RPD for this parameter is outside control limits. The overall quality control for this analysis meets acceptability criteria. (3) - The recovery was above the upper control limit. This may represent a high bias in some results for this specific analyte. For results that were not detected (ND), this potential bias has no impact. (4) - The matrix spike recovery was below the lower control limit. This may be due in part to the reducing environment of the sample. Page 16 of 18 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a i/laxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recove QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recove QC Limits 3071860 Soluble 20:1 Chloride CI 2012/12/18 103 75-125 103 75-125 ND RDL=20 uq/q u/q NC 35 3071861 Nitrite N 2012/12/17 110 75-125 108 75-125 ND RDL=0.5 uq/q u/q NC 25 3071861 Nitrate N 2012/12/17 109 75-125 108 75-125 ND RDL=2 uq/q u/q NC 25 3071861 Nitrate + Nitrite 2012/12/17 109 75-125 108 75- 125 ND RDL=3 uq/q u/q NC 25 3071862 Soluble 20:1 Sulphate SO4 2012/12/18 100 75-125 105 75-125 ND RDL=20 u / NC 35 3074027 Total Organic Carbon 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=500 m /k 2.4 35 98 75 - 125 N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit RPD = Relative Percent Difference Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. QC Standard: A sample of known concentration prepared by an external agency under stringent conditions. Used as an independent check of method accuracy. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. (1) -The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated (NC). Because of the high concentration of this analyte in the parent sample, the relative difference between the spiked and unspiked concentrations is not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. (2) - Recovery or RPD for this parameter is outside control limits. The overall quality control for this analysis meets acceptability criteria. (3) - The recovery was above the upper control limit. This may represent a high bias in some results for this specific analyte. For results that were not detected (ND), this potential bias has no impact. (4) - The matrix spike recovery was below the lower control limit. This may be due in part to the reducing environment of the sample. Page 16 of 18 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a i/laxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA El ?_<5 El r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job M B2J3659 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Cha4@4 Afecle"r, W.', M.Sc., C.Chem, Senior Analyst 04c'0� cztr, L Cristina Carriere, Scientific Services E,rae Pr-ai tjfe �: Ewa Pranjic, , Scientific Specialist sj� Jeevaraj Jeevaratrnam, Senior Analyst Page 17 of 18 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NI El ?_<5 E] r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). n r el 1 S Medhat Riskallah, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department Altl�� Yuan h , gc\tns Technician Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5. 10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 18 of 18 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca J MJ___ � r I V ! C_ K,;l Cl M 74b o ysissauga. ON L5N 2L8 Phone' 905.817-5700 fax: 905.817.5779 Toll Free: (aOD) 563-6266 INVOICE INFORMATION Company Namo Nil �f Collect Name r� i°l-�//..r.+ rr»/1_ Phone. D W 'F ! ! _l _/_,0 - 7' Phone: Email, F ) t/ i:mall, '—Note: For MBE Regulated Orinking Water samples, Please use the Orinking Water CorC - ANALYSIS REQUESTED (please be Regulation 153 (2011) Other Regulations Tablet Table Z ResrParkMsd•'Flne IndlCQmm LJ CCME5( Sannary sewer syiaw t ~ Q Coarse Reg. 558 Slorm Sewer %taw Table 3 Ag'A)"er For RSC MI5A Municipality: m 3 3 f JCTable Yea PMDD ci r +1J — No Other (spacity)' p c y I Int;lude Criteria On Certificate of Analysis (Y/IV)? re • •• vJ Sample IdentilicatlonDate Sampied Time Sam ted Matrix Icw, sw, sal, 94c) p _ %] CHAIN OF CUSTC (RECORD 88232 Page __L Of /_ PROJECT INFORMATION MAXXAM JOB NUMBER Quotation m % PO 0. Project k f V CHAIN OF CUSTODY # Silo Location: Site k: 00 Sampied By. fc) TURNAROUND TIME (TAT) REQUIRED • ,�'[011183:810 M V) Regular IStandard) TAT: (5-7 working days for most tests) Rush TAT: "'tiamples must be rocelvart by Spm to gusrantee your TAT"" RushConfirmationConfirmation t PN us- I _I 1 day 2 days 3 days Date Req'd: taxa kr wt& te6k NO a 8 deyd ft&V =the yaUr P,oy�i hrarmgar rw det�Ra Cont, COMMENT�rTAT COMMENTS 7 -Dec -1214:49 Mar \ am :irehar1dd II tl f I illlll �IIlII IIIIII PIS I Idf _ B2J3659 \PZ ENT -69.2 'RELINQUISHED BY (Signature/Print) Date (YY im D) Time• RECEIVED BY: t5lgnaturs/POnq @fie riY1N!/MM/DD) Tima: dJARS USEp AND r, _ _ � awl..- � '>Sj r Lrff Z � �Cy NOT 3U6'NAITTED Gusto Laboratory Use )nl — _ Seal Yes Na Temperature rcC on Recepl — — — — ►-- Present "r'I �, / y 13' („ `MANDATORY SECTIONS IN GREY MUST BE FILLED OUT, AN INCOMPLETE CHAIi�I OF CUSTODY MAY RESULT IN ANALYTICAL TAT DELAYS. COC-1004lo-121-Etuv Elva MBr.�era a.nalyth� imd,iuilnn'el 9,p.intliefi � a Mueu,in ,tnalrYics • Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Maxxam Sample: PX1368 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED1-3 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram FICA I _CDE'14. F -2Y -11.C,.' P:.. 1 a �,LA- C4 r� 14 •' "� �' ' 14 1 13 11-1 r� Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Maxam Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Maxxam Sample: PX1369 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED2-3 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram FID '12DEC14AT46F5301D) P:.. 1 a l+ 14 1 13 11-1 rfl Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/19 Maxxam Job #: B2J3659 Maxxam Sample: PX1370 P t t Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED3-2 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram a 4r_ 0 LL f 14 1 13 11-1 r� Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Your Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Your C.O.C. #: 88235 Attention: Geoff Lussier Terrapex Environmental Ltd 90 Scarsdale Rd Toronto, ON M3B 2R7 Success Through Science - Report Date: 2013/03/08 This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: B2J7015 Received: 2012/12/13, 14:25 Sample Matrix: SEDIMENT # Samples Received: 4 Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. Page 1 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Chloride (20:1 extract) 4 N/A 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00463 EPA 325.2 Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC (1) 1 2012/12/19 2012/12/20 CAM SOP -00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC (1) 3 2012/12/19 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00436 EPA SW846-3060/7199 Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil 4 2012/12/14 2012/12/20 CAM SOP -00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil 1 2012/12/20 2012/12/20 CAM SOP -00316 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil 3 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00316 CCME CWS Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil 4 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00448 APHA 4500FC Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS 4 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00447 EPA 6020 Moisture 4 N/A 2012/12/20 CAM SOP -00445 R.Carter,1993 Ammonia -N 4 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00441 Carter, SS&A Nitrate (NO3) and Nitrite (NO2) in Soil 4 N/A 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00440 SM 4500 NO3I/NO2B OC Pesticides (Selected) & PCB (2) 4 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 CAM SOP -00307 SW846 8081, 8082 PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM) 4 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 CAM SOP - 00318 EPA 8270 pH CaCl2 EXTRACT 4 2012/12/20 2012/12/20 CAM SOP -00413 SM 4500H+ B Sulphate (20:1 Extract) 4 N/A 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00464 EPA 375.4 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen - Soil 4 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00454 EPA 351.2 Rev 2 Total Organic Carbon in Soil 4 N/A 2012/12/21 CAM SOP -00468 LECO Combustion Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. Page 1 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 -2- " Results relate only to the items tested. (1) Soils are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified. (2) Chlordane ( Total) = Alpha Chlordane + Gamma Chlordane Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Maryann Arghandeh, Email: mArghand@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 2 Page 2 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 CCME PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID I PY9584 I PY9585 I PY9585 I PY9586 I PY9587 I PY9587 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 Units SED1-1 SED2-1 SED2-1 Lab-Dup SED3-1 SED10-1 SED10-1 Lab -Du RDL fQC Batch Inorganics Moisture % 21 22 18 19 20 1.0 3076506 BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons Benzene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.005 3076714 Toluene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 3076714 Eth (benzene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.01 3076714 o -X lene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.02 3076714 +m -X lene Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.04 3076714 Total Xylenes ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 0.04 3076714 F1 C6 -C10 ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND ND 10 3076714 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX Ug/g Ug/g ND ND ND ND ND 10 3076714 F2 -F4 Hydrocarbons F2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) u / ND ND ND ND 10 3076232 F3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) u / 180 19 ND 83 10 3076232 F4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) u / 40 ND ND 12 10 3076232 Reached Baseline at C50 u / YES YES YES YES 3076232 Surrogate Recover 1,4-Difluorobenzene % 97 99 98 95 95 3076714 4-Bromofluorobenzene % 104 105 105 103 104 3076714 D10-Eth (benzene % 86 94 84 77 88 3076714 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 100 100 101 100 100 3076714 o -Ter hen I % 87 89 88 88 3076232 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 3 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SEDIMENT Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID I PY9584 I PY9584 I PY9585 I PY9586 I PY9587 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 2012/12/05 Units SED1-1 SED1-1 Lab -Du QC Batch SED2-1 SED3-1 SED10-1 RDL FQC Batch Inorganics Total Ammonia -N ug/g ug/g ND 3077665 68 ND ND 25 3077665 Soluble 20:1 Chloride(Cl)ug/g ug/g ND 3077660 ND 21 ND 20 3077660 Chromium VI ug/gug/g ND 3075489 ND ND ND 0.2 3075908 Fluoride F- ug/gug/g ND ND 3077659 ND ND ND 5 3077659 Total Organic Carbon mg/kg 7800 3077354 6400 4300 6900 500 3077354 Available CaC12 H pH 7.12 3076377 7.09 7.25 7.12 3076388 Soluble 20:1 Sulphate SO4 u / ND 3077661 ND ND ND 20 3077661 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen u /q 321 3076217 500 217 459 10 3076217 Nitrite N ug/gug/g ND ND 3077662 NDND ND 0.5 3077662 Nitrate N u / ND IN 3077662 ND ND ND 2 3077662 Nitrate + Nitrite u / ND ND 3077662 ND ND ND 3 3077662 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 4 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PY9584 PY9585 PY9586 PY9587 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 2012/12/05 Units I SED1-1 SED2-1 SED3-1 SED10-1 RDL QC Batch Metals Acid Extractable Aluminum(Al)ug/g ug/g 2600 3000 1700 2600 50 3077549 Acid Extractable Antimony Sb ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3077549 Acid Extractable Arsenic As ug/gug/g 1.5 1.9 1.2 1.6 1.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Barium Ba ug/gug/g 18 20 11 17 0.50 3077549 Acid Extractable Beryllium Be ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3077549 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd ug/gug/g ND ND ND 0.10 0.10 3077549 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca ug/gug/g 61000 68000 57000 63000 50 3077549 Acid Extractable Chromium Cr ug/gug/g 6.0 6.0 4.7 5.7 1.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co ug/gug/g 2.5 3.1 1.7 2.5 0.10 3077549 Acid Extractable Copper Cu ug/gug/g 5.9 8.5 3.8 5.9 0.50 3077549 Acid Extractable Iron Fe ug/gug/g 7500 8500 5900 7500 50 3077549 Acid Extractable Lead Pb ug/gug/g 4.2 5.3 2.8 4.3 1.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Magnesium M u/quq/q 13000 14000 11000 13000 50 3077549 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn ug/gug/g 270 360 210 290 1.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Molybdenum Mo ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.50 3077549 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni ug/gug/g 4.9 6.3 3.4 5.0 0.50 3077549 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P ug/gug/g 750 620 640 770 50 3077549 Acid Extractable Potassium K ug/gug/g 290 360 210 300 200 3077549 Acid Extractable Selenium Se ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.50 3077549 Acid Extractable Silver A ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.20 3077549 Acid Extractable Sodium Na ug/gug/g 100 110 ND ND 100 3077549 Acid Extractable Strontium Sr uq/q u/q 73 83 68 75 1.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Thallium TI ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.050 3077549 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 5.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Uranium U ug/gug/g 0.24 0.28 0.24 0.27 0.050 3077549 Acid Extractable Vanadium V ug/gug/g 11 11 9.1 11 5.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn ug/gug/g 27 29 16 25 5.0 3077549 Acid Extractable Mercury H ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.050 3077549 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 5 of 19 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC -MS (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PY9584 PY9585 PY9586 PY9587 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 2012/12/05 Units SED1-1 SED2-1 SE133-1 SED10-1 I RDL QC Batch Pol aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074309 Acenaphthylene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074309 Anthracene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074309 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/g ug/g 0.0076 0.010 0.0066 0.0084 0.0050 3074309 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/g ug/g 0.0079 0.0098 0.0067 0.0096 0.0050 3074309 Benzo b/' fluoranthene uq/q u/q 0.013 0.017 0.011 0.016 0.0050 3074309 Benzo ,h,i er lene ug/g ug/g ND 0.0061 ND 0.0066 0.0050 3074309 Benzo k fluoranthene ug/g ug/g ND 0.0059 ND 0.0054 0.0050 3074309 Chr sene ug/g ug/g 0.011 0.020 0.0084 0.016 0.0050 3074309 Dibenz a,h anthracene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074309 Fluoranthene ug/g ug/g 0.017 0.022 0.017 0.021 0.0050 3074309 Fluorene uq/q u/q ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074309 Indeno 1,2,3 -cd rene ug/g ug/g 0.0058 0.0069 ND 0.0073 0.0050 3074309 1 -Meth Inaphthalene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074309 2 -Methyl nahthalene ug/g ug/g 0.0052 0.0065 ND ND 0.0050 3074309 Naphthalene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074309 Phenanthrene ug/q ug/q 0.0068 0.0094 0.0090 0.011 0.0050 3074309 Pyrene ug/g ug/g 0.015 0.018 0.014 0.017 0.0050 3074309 Surrogate Recover D10 -Anthracene % 87 82 85 83 3074309 D14 -Ter hen I FS % 94 92 95 92 3074309 D8 -Acenaphthylene % 80 77 81 78 3074309 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 6 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PY9584 PY9585 PY9586 PY9587 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 2012/12/05 Units SE131-1 SE132-1 SE133-1 I SED10-1 I RDL QC Batch Pesticides & Herbicides Aldrin ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 a -Chlordane ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Chlordane ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Chlordane Total ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 o, -DDD ug/g ug/g 0.0030 DN ND 0.0030 0.0020 3074051 p,p-DDD uq/q u/q 0.0090 ND 0.0040 0.0080 0.0020 3074051 o, -DDD + -DDD ug/g ug/g 0.012 ND 0.0040 0.011 0.0020 3074051 o, -DDE ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 p,p-DDE ug/g ug/g 0.019 0.0040 0.0050 0.016 0.0020 3074051 o, -DDE + -DDE ug/g ug/g 0.019 0.0040 0.0050 0.016 0.0020 3074051 o, -DDT ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 p,p-DDT u/q 0.0030 ND ND 0.0020 0.0020 3074051 o, -DDT + -DDT ug/g ug/g 0.0030 ND ND 0.0020 0.0020 3074051 DDT+ Metabolites ug/g ug/g 0.034 0.0040 0.0090 0.029 0.0020 3074051 Dieldrin ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Lindane ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Endosulfan (alpha) ug/gug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Endosulfan II ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Total Endosulfan ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Endrin ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Heptachlor ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Heptachlor epoxide ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Hexachlorobenzene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Methoxychlor ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0050 3074051 Aroclor 1016 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1221 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1232 uq/q u/q ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1242 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1248 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1254 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1260 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1262 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Aroclor 1268 ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 Total PCB ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.015 3074051 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 7 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ 1 rn Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY GC -ECD (SEDIMENT) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Maxxam ID PY9584 PY9585 PY9586 PY9587 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/06 2012/12/05 Units SE131-1 SE132-1 SE133-1 SED10-1 RDL QC Batch alpha -BHC ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 beta -BHC ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 delta -BHC ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Endosulfan sulfate ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Endrin aldehyde ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Endrin ketone ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Mirex ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Octachlorost rene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.0020 3074051 Toxaphene ug/g ug/g ND ND ND ND 0.080 3074051 Surrogate Recover 2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-x Iene % 87 90 80 88 3074051 Decachlorobi hen I % 82 91 81 96 3074051 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 8 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 Maxxam ID PY9584 Sample ID SED1-1 Matrix SEDIMENT Test Descrintion Test Summary Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/13 Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3077660 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3075489 2012/12/19 2012/12/20 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3076714 2012/12/14 2012/12/20 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3076232 2012/12/20 2012/12/20 Barbara Wowk Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3077659 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Surinder Rai Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3077549 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Kevin Comerford Moisture BAL 3076506 N/A 2012/12/20 Shivani Desai Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3077665 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3077662 N/A 2012/12/21 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3074051 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3074309 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Darryl Tiller H CaC12 EXTRACT 3076377 2012/12/20 2012/12/20 Xuanhon Qiu Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3077661 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kieldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3076217 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 Chandra Nandlal Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3077354 N/A 2012/12/21 Birenkumar Patel Maxxam ID PY9584 Dup Collected 2012/12/05 Sample ID SED1-1 Shipped Matrix SEDIMENT Received 2012/12/13 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3077659 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Surinder Rai Nitrate (NO3) and Nitrite (NO2) in Soil LACH 3077662 N/A 2012/12/21 Chris Li Page 9 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 Maxxam ID PY9585 Sample ID SED2-1 Matrix SEDIMENT Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/13 Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3077660 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3075908 2012/12/19 2012/12/21 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3076714 2012/12/14 2012/12/20 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3076232 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 Barbara Wowk Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3077659 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Surinder Rai Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3077549 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Kevin Comerford Moisture BAL 3076506 N/A 2012/12/20 Shivani Desai Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3077665 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3077662 N/A 2012/12/21 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3074051 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3074309 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Darryl Tiller H CaC12 EXTRACT 3076388 2012/12/20 2012/12/20 Xuanhon Qiu Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3077661 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kieldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3076217 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 Chandra Nandlal Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3077354 N/A 2012/12/21 Birenkumar Patel Maxxam ID PY9585 Dup Sample ID SED2-1 Matrix SEDIMENT Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/13 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3076714 2012/12/14 2012/12/20 Lincoln Ramdahin Page 10 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 Maxxam ID PY9586 Sample ID SED3-1 Matrix SEDIMENT Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/06 Shipped Received 2012/12/13 Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3077660 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3075908 2012/12/19 2012/12/21 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3076714 2012/12/14 2012/12/20 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3076232 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 Barbara Wowk Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3077659 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Surinder Rai Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3077549 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Kevin Comerford Moisture BAL 3076506 N/A 2012/12/20 Shivani Desai Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3077665 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3077662 N/A 2012/12/21 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3074051 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3074309 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Darryl Tiller H CaC12 EXTRACT 3076388 2012/12/20 2012/12/20 Xuanhon Qiu Sulphate 20:1 Extract AC/EC 3077661 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine Total Kieldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3076217 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 Chandra Nandlal Total Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3077354 N/A 2012/12/21 Birenkumar Patel Maxxam ID PY9587 Sample ID SED10-1 Matrix SEDIMENT Test Descrintion Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/13 Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst Chloride 20:1 extract AC/EC 3077660 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC IC/SPEC 3075908 2012/12/19 2012/12/21 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Soil HSGC/MSFD 3076714 2012/12/14 2012/12/20 Lincoln Ramdahin Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil GC/FID 3076232 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 Barbara Wowk Soluble Fluoride analysis in Soil F 3077659 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Surinder Rai Acid Extr. Metals (aqua regia) by ICPMS ICP/MS 3077549 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Kevin Comerford Moisture BAL 3076506 N/A 2012/12/20 Shivani Desai Ammonia -N LACH/NH4 3077665 2012/12/21 2012/12/21 Alina Dobreanu Nitrate NO3 and Nitrite NO2 in Soil LACH 3077662 N/A 2012/12/21 Chris Li OC Pesticides Selected & PCB GC/ECD 3074051 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Farahnaz Somwaru PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS SIM GC/MS 3074309 2012/12/18 2012/12/19 Darryl Tiller H CaC12 EXTRACT 3076388 2012/12/20 2012/12/20 Xuanhong Qiu Page 11 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Test Summary sulphate (20:1 Extract) AC/EC 3077661 N/A 2012/12/21 Deonarine Ramnarine otal Kjeldahl Nitrogen - Soil AC 3076217 2012/12/20 2012/12/21 Chandra Nandlal otal Organic Carbon in Soil LECO 3077354 N/A 2012/12/21 Birenkumar Patel Maxxam ID PY9587 Dup Collected 2012/12/05 Sample ID SED10-1 Shipped Matrix SEDIMENT Received 2012/12/13 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Moisture BAL 3076506 N/A 2012/12/20 Shivani Desai Page 12 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 Package 1 1 0.3°C Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt GENERAL COMMENTS success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Revised report (2013/03/08): Organophosphorus Pesticide results for sample SED3-1 have been amended. Sample PY9584-01: BTEX & F2- F4 Analysis was performed past the sample holding time. This may increase the variability associated with these results. Sample PY9585-01: BTEX & F2- F4 Analysis was performed past the sample holding time. This may increase the variability associated with these results. Sample PY9587-01: BTEX & F2- F4 Analysis was performed past the sample holding time. This may increase the variability associated with these results. Page 13 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 14 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3074051 2,4 5 6-Tetrachloro-m-x lene 2012/12/19 82 50-130 88 50-130 91 % 3074051 Decachlorobi hen I 2012/12/19 90 50-130 104 50-130 95 % 3074051 Aldrin 2012/12/19 94 50-130 99 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 a -Chlordane 2012/12/19 109 50-130 102 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 -Chlordane 2012/12/19 94 50-130 92 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 uqlq u/q NC 40 3074051 o, -DDD 2012/12/19 97 50-130 98 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3074051 -DDD 2012/12/19 99 50-130 101 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 o, -DDE 2012/12/19 104 50-130 109 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3074051 -DDE 2012/12/19 116 50-130 113 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 o, -DDT 2012/12/19 111 50-130 114 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3074051 -DDT 2012/12/19 114 50-130 113 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 Dieldrin 2012/12/19 94 50-130 98 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 Lindane 2012/12/19 81 50-130 85 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 Endosulfan I (alpha) 2012/12/19 92 50-130 94 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3074051 Endosulfan II 2012/12/19 87 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 Endrin 2012/12/19 95 50-130 100 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq1q NC 40 3074051 Heptachlor 2012/12/19 98 50-130 104 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 He tachlore oxide 2012/12/19 90 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3074051 Hexachlorobenzene 2012/12/19 86 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 Methoxychlor 2012/12/19 94 50-130 95 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 alpha -BHC 2012/12/19 93 30-130 98 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 beta -BHC 2012/12/19 83 30-130 88 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 delta -BHC 2012/12/19 84 30-130 89 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 1 Endosulfan sulfate 2012/12/19 97 30-130 100 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 Endrin aldehyde 2012/12/19 101 30-130 98 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 Endrin ketone 2012/12/19 106 30-130 100 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 Mirex 2012/12/19 114 30-130 111 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u /, 3074051 Octachlorost rene 2012/12/19 97 30-130 102 30-130 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 Aroclor 1242 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 Total PCB 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 IToxaphene 2012/12/19 ND RDL=0.080 Uq/q U/q NC 50 3074051 Chlordane Total 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.0020 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3074051 o, -DDD+ -DDD 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 o, -DDE+ -DDE 2012/12/19 ND,RDL=0.0020 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3074051 o, -DDT+ -DDT 2012/12/19 ND,RDL=0.0020 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074051 DDT+Metabolites 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.0020 u / 3074051 Total Endosulfan 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.0020 Uq/Q U/Q NC 40 3074051 Aro clor 1016 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3074051 lArodor 1221 2012/12/19 ND RDL=0.015 u / 3074051 JArodor 1232 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 u / Page 14 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 15 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3074051 Aroclor 1248 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 Uq/g U/g NC 40 3074051 Aroclor 1254 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 Uq/g U/g NC 40 3074051 Aroclor 1260 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 Uq/g U/g NC 40 3074051 Aroclor 1262 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3074051 Aroclor 1268 2012/12/19 ND, RDL=0.015 u / 3074309 D10 -Anthracene 2012/12/19 82 50-130 81 50-130 105 % 3074309 D14 -Ter hen I FS 2012/12/19 94 50-130 86 50-130 105 % 3074309 D8 -Acenaphthylene 2012/12/19 84 50-130 79 50-130 91 % 3074309 Acenaphthene 2012/12/19 88 50-130 84 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3074309 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/19 82 50-130 78 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ua/a u/a NC 40 3074309 Anthracene 2012/12/19 78 50-130 75 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uq/q u/q NC 40 3074309 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/19 103 50-130 96 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ua/a u/a NC 40 3074309 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/19 91 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074309 Benzo b/' fluoranthene 2012/12/19 91 50-130 90 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/g ug/g NC 40 3074309 Benzo h i e lene 2012/12/19 72 50-130 68 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/g U/g NC 40 3074309 Benzo k fluoranthene 2012/12/19 104 50-130 98 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3074309 Ch Bene 2012/12/19 96 50-130 92 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074309 Dibenz a,h anthracene 2012/12/19 95 50-130 90 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uq/q u/q NC 40 3074309 Fluoranthene 2012/12/19 89 50-130 83 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uq/q u/q NC 40 3074309 Fluorene 2012/12/19 97 50-130 93 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ua/a u/a NC 40 3074309 Indeno 1,2 3 -cd rene 2012/12/19 81 50-130 77 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074309 1 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/19 93 50-130 91 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 ug/q ug/q NC 40 3074309 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/19 90 50-130 88 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/g U/g NC 40 3074309 Naphthalene 2012/12/19 78 50-130 77 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Uq/q U/q NC 40 3074309 lPhenanthrene 2012/12/19 90 50-130 82 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 Ug/q Ug/q NC 40 3074309 Pyrene 2012/12/19 92 50-130 86 50-130 ND, RDL=0.0050 uq/q u/q NC 40 3075489 Chromium VI 2012/12/20 21(1,2) 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=0.2 Uq/q U/q NC 35 83 75-125 3075908 Chromium VI 2012/12/21 14(1,2) 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=0.2 Ug/q Ug/q NC 35 98 75-125 3076217 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 ND, RDL=10 Uq/q U/q 6.9 40 83 80-120 3076232 o -Ter hen I 2012/12/20 86 50-130 87 50-130 90 % 3076232 F2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/20 91 50-130 91 80-120 ND RDL=10 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3076232 F3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/20 95 50-130 98 80-120 ND, RDL=10 Uq/Q U/Q NC 30 3076232 F4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/20 89 50-130 93 80-120 ND, RDL=10 Uq/q U/q NC 30 3076506 Moisture 2012/12/20 2.1 20 3076714 1,4-Difluorobenzene 2012/12/20 95 60-140 97 60-140 98 % 3076714 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/12/20 103 60-140 106 60-140 106 % 3076714 D10-Eth lbenzene 2012/12/20 78 60-140 86 60-140 85 % 3076714 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2012/12/20 99 60-140 100 60-140 100 % 3076714 113enzene 2012/12/20 85 60-140 101 60-130 ND RD =0.005 uq/q u/q NC 50 3076714 IToluene 2012/12/20 69 60-140 84 60-130 ND, RDL=0.02 ug/g ug/g NC 50 Page 15 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA Page 16 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Standard QC Batch Parameter Date %Recovery QC Limits %Recove QC Limits Value Units Value % QC Limits %Recovery IQCLimits 3076714 Eth (benzene 2012/12/20 71 60-140 91 60-130 ND, RDL=0.01 uq/q u/q NC 50 3076714 o -X lene 2012/12/20 69 60-140 86 60-130 ND, RDL=0.02 uq/q u/q NC 50 3076714 +m -X lene 2012/12/20 63 60-140 79 60-130 ND, RDL=0.04 uq/g u/g NC 50 3076714 F1 C6 -C10 2012/12/20 86 60-140 103 80-120 ND, RDL=10 uq/q u/q NC 50 3076714 Total Xylenes 2012/12/20 ND, RDL=0.04 uqlq u/q NC 50 3076714 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX 2012/12/20 ND, RDL=10 ug/g ug/g NC 50 3077354 Total Organic Carbon 2012/12/21 ND RDL=500 mq/kq m/k NC 35 101 75-125 3077549 Acid Extractable Aluminum(Al)2012/12/21 NC 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Antimony Sb 2012/12/21 100 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q 14.2 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Arsenic As 2012/12/21 103 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/q u/q NC 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Barium Ba 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 102 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 6.4 30 3077549 JAcid Extractable Beryllium Be 2012/12/21 103 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q NC 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Cadmium Cd 2012/12/21 103 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 u / NC 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Calcium Ca 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 107 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Chromium Cr 2012/12/21 105 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 u / 3.2 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Cobalt Co 2012/12/21 98 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=0.10 uq/q u/q 7.2 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Copper Cu 2012/12/21 97 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uqlq u/q 0.6 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Iron Fe 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 111 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Lead Pb 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 uq/q u/q 8.1 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Magnesium M 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 101 80-120 ND RDL=50 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Manganese Mn 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Molybdenum Mo 2012/12/21 98 75-125 96 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q NC 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Nickel Ni 2012/12/21 102 75-125 101 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 uq/q u/q 3.1 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Phosphorus P 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 106 80-120 ND, RDL=50 u / 3077549 JAcid Extractable Potassium K 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=200 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Selenium Se 2012/12/21 99 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.50 ug/g ug/g NC 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Silver A 2012/12/21 103 75-125 102 80-120 ND, RDL=0.20 uq/q u/q NC 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Sodium Na 2012/12/21 101 75-125 98 80-120 ND, RDL=100 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Strontium Sr 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 99 80-120 ND, RDL=1.0 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Thallium TI 2012/12/21 89 75-125 87 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 uq/q u/q NC 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Tin (Sn) 2012/12/21 104 75-125 102 80-120 ND RDL=5.0 u / 3077549 Acid Extractable Uranium U 2012/12/21 98 75-125 97 80-120 ND, RDL=0.050 ug/g ug/g 8.5 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Vanadium V 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 100 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 uq/q u/q 4.4 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Zinc Zn 2012/12/21 NC 75-125 104 80-120 ND, RDL=5.0 uq/CI u/CI 9.6 30 3077549 Acid Extractable Mercur H 2012/12/21 82 75-125 99 80-120 ND RDL=0.050 uq/q u/q NC 30 3077659 Fluoride F- 2012/12/21 99 80-120 109 80-120 ND, RDL=5 uq/q u/q NC 25 3077660 Soluble 20:1 Chloride CI 2012/12/21 104 75-125 104 75-125 ND, RDL=20 ug/q ug/q NC 35 3077661 Soluble 20:1 Sulphate SO4 2012/12/21 107 75-125 104 75-125 ND, RDL=20 ug/q ug/q NC 35 3077662 INitrite N 2012/12/21 109 75-125 103 75-125 ND RDL=0.5 uq/q u/q NC 25 3077662 INitrate N 2012/12/21 113 75-125 104 75-125 ND, RDL=2 uq/q u/q NC 25 Page 16 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Report Date: 2013/03/08 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: RA N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit RPD = Relative Percent Difference Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. QC Standard: A sample of known concentration prepared by an external agency under stringent conditions. Used as an independent check of method accuracy. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. (1) - Recovery or RPD for this parameter is outside control limits. The overall quality control for this analysis meets acceptability criteria. (2) - The matrix spike recovery was below the lower control limit. This may be due in part to the reducing environment of the sample. Page 17 of 19 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA El ?_<5 El r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Cha4@4 Afecle"r, W.', M.Sc., C.Chem, Senior Analyst EVA! P t Ewa Pranjic, .'��- .Oi"" , Scientific Specialist \ ISLlow Medhat Riskallah, Manager, Hydrocarbon Department c Ma Salib, Analyst, Hydrocarbons Page 18 of 19 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NI El ?_<5 E] r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job M B2J7015 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Altl�� Yuanh t, gc\ms Technician Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5. 10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 19 of 19 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma M 6740 Campobello Road, Mlssissaugo, CN 1-5N 21-8 � Phone: 905-817-5700 Fax: 905-617-5779 Toll Free: (800) 563-6266 CHAIN OF OUST Y RECORD 88235 Page —L of/-- INVO E INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION (if Versfrom muoicO PROJECT INFORMATION MAXXAM JOB NUMBER / Company Name:7 L% l ton Name I �" v 4 }uotarl❑n a Contact Name: SS I / Contact Name P.C. k Address. �V _ � Address Project #� (,d r CHAIN OF CUSTODY Sate Location. ou -1 t G3 - 3 0 l0 Fax:: Phone: Fax: � la a� Email: Email. ` amGled By, •.. Note: For MOE Regula led Drinking Water samples, please use the Drinking Water CofC.—' ANALYST VESTED (Please be specific) IUIRED 13 -Deo -11 14:25 ` Regulation 153 (2011) Other Regulations t y Z \4aryam Arghandch +l Table 1 Res Par�Med/Re n CCM Sanitary Sewer BylawTabla 2 IndlCatnmCarso Reg. 558 Strynn Sewer Bylaw v \ r I� III��II (II��I�I��IIIIIIII 32J7015 Table 3 Agr0therMISA Fur RSC Munlapallay x E } 1 NV- 1 nrae your TAT.. Tabla _ Yes PWQO No Lilner Ispecifyj: Y h v �. ` Rush Conffrrnstlon # PN O o El day� 2 days 3 days iZX nclude Criteria on Certificate of Analysis (YIN)?SAMPLES v m iz I l y Date Req"d: MUST BE KEPTee r s . SAMPLING UNTIL O (t 0v 2 w 4 TATs qr certain teats era > 5 days %. ovrmcr your PMJect l6kneger for derofdt Sample Identification Date Time Sampled Sampled Matrix Icw. sw sa. eu,1 # of Cont COMMENTS 1 TAT COMMENTS 1 d i iV 2~ L� Ait 4 1Z'/0-1 UXnIN 5 J 8 9' 10 •RE UISHED (S19-afts M1PrIntJ Date IYYYYI MlDDI Tim • RECEIVED BYs ISlgnatm/Print) Date NMY MMiDD) Time: #JARS USED AND NOT SUBMITTED Laboratory Use Only ? 7 L Custody Temperature ('CI on F4ecelpt l Seal Yes No — _ _ y j✓J (J Present l at—, � L lmact ©1() . *MANDATORY SECTIONS IN GREY MUST BE FILLED OUT. AN INCOMPLETE CHAIN OF CUSTODY MAY RESULT IN ANALYTICAL TAT DELAYS. COC4U04 {06021 • ENV Etat %1 -vi Anaryf,ea Irvemallunal Curp❑a,mnr. rv. Ni�,arn .Anaf"i,ls Vdhlld Maxum reli❑w Men ping 0101 Maxam Report Date: 2013/03/08 Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Maxxam Sample: PY9584 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED1-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. F I C12 B. "Cl E 20Al 2"Ll I B 16 1.111 T T11 11 _ I ISI hlC �1 } 3500 D 3 0 ol+ 1 1 11 Y1 r1 C*� 1.11_ _1 � C=} 1 ITI 141 i I �a 14 1 I, M Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Maxam Report Date: 2013/03/08 Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Maxxam Sample: PY9585 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED2-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. F I Cl2 B. "Cl E 20 Al I B 17 1. 11 "1 T T11 1 1 _ I ISI hlC �1 } 3500 D 3 0 ol+ ' 1 11 Yi L17-1 Cha 1 ITI I�I i _ I —37 14 1 I_, M Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2013/03/08 Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Maxxam Sample: PY9586 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED3-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. FIC12 B. ''CIEI '2012".07.22BI'Hi1.1I T T11 11 _ I ISI hlC �1 } 3 0 ol+ 1 11 ' Y1 1 11-41-1 ITI 1 11-41 1 14 Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Maxam Report Date: 2013/03/08 Maxxam Job #: B2J7015 Maxxam Sample: PY9587 Success Through Science,, Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: SED10-1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Soil Chromatogram Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. F I C12 B. "Cl E 0 Al B 1 Q 01. EI "I T T11 1 1 _ I lel hlC �1 } 3500 D 3 0 ol+ ' Y1 1 11 C=7 —1 111 _ - - LID 1 I_I 1 11-41 1 fY�f r� Tr { K: ] C=a 14 Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Your Project #: MB2J2495 Site Location: CB664.00 Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR MAXXAM ANALYTICS CAMPOBELLO 6740 CAMPOBELLO ROAD MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L5N 21-8 Success Through Science - Report Date: 2013/01/11 This report supersedes all previous reports with the same Maxxam job number CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: 6262016 Received: 2012/12/11, 9:45 Sample Matrix: Water # Samples Received: 4 * RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. (1) B[a]P TPE is calculated using 1/2 of the RDL for non detect results as per Alberta Environment instructions. This protocol may not apply in other jurisdictions. Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Carmen McKay, Project Manager Assistant Email: CMcKay@maxxam.ca Phone# (403) 291-3077 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 1 Ma -am Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 1 of 11 Date Date Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Analytical Method Cadmium - low level CCME - Dissolved 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00043 EPA 200.8 Elements by ICP - Dissolved 4 N/A 2012/12/14 AB SOP -00042 EPA 200.7 Elements by ICPMS - Dissolved 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00043 EPA 200.8 Elements by ICPMS - Dissolved (Ext List) 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00043 EPA 200.8 Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalency 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00003 EPA 8270D Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (1) 2 2012/12/11 2012/12/11 AB SOP -00003 EPA 3510C/8270D AB SOP -00037 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (1) 2 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00003 EPA 3510C/8270D AB SOP -00037 * RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. (1) B[a]P TPE is calculated using 1/2 of the RDL for non detect results as per Alberta Environment instructions. This protocol may not apply in other jurisdictions. Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Carmen McKay, Project Manager Assistant Email: CMcKay@maxxam.ca Phone# (403) 291-3077 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 1 Ma -am Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 1 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 6262016 Report Date: 2013/01/11 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: C13664.00 Sampler Initials: SS REGULATED METALS (CCME/AT1) - DISSOLVED Success Through Science- MaxxamID FF1127 FF1127 FF1128 FF1129 FF1130 Sampling Date ug/L 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 0.0050 6414304 Elements UNITS MW101 MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 RDL QC Batch Dissolved Aluminum (AI) ug/L (PW5670) (PW5670) (PW5671) (PW5672) (PW5673) 1.0 6418211 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) ug/L <0.60 Lab -Du <0.60 <0.60 <0.60 0.60 6418211 Low Level Elements Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) ug/L <0.0050 N/A <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.0050 6414304 Elements Dissolved Aluminum (AI) ug/L 1.2 1.2 1.4 2.2 2.2 1.0 6418211 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) ug/L <0.60 <0.60 <0.60 <0.60 <0.60 0.60 6418211 Dissolved Arsenic (As) ug/L 3.3 3.3 8.4 4.1 4.5 0.20 6418211 Dissolved Barium (Ba) ug/L 97 N/A 150 110 120 10 6417487 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 6418211 Dissolved Boron (B) ug/L 82 N/A 77 41 38 20 6417487 Dissolved Calcium (Ca) ug/L 100000 N/A 190000 200000 210000 300 6417487 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 6418211 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) ug/L 1.1 1.1 0.75 0.60 0.63 0.30 6418211 Dissolved Copper (Cu) ug/L <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.73 0.70 0.20 6418211 Dissolved Iron (Fe) ug/L 4300 N/A 7700 20000 22000 60 6417487 Dissolved Lead (Pb) ug/L <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.20 6418211 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) ug/L 12000 N/A 13000 28000 29000 200 6417487 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) ug/L 640 N/A 950 1800 1800 4.0 6417487 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) ug/L 4.1 4.3 4.7 0.73 0.64 0.20 6418211 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) ug/L 1.7 1.8 0.98 <0.50 <0.50 0.50 6418211 Dissolved Phosphorus (P) ug/L <100 N/A <100 810 790 100 6417487 Dissolved Potassium (K) ug/L 2300 N/A 2800 4900 5200 300 6417487 Dissolved Selenium (Se) ug/L 0.31 0.25 <0.20 0.37 0.36 0.20 6418211 Dissolved Silicon (Si) ug/L 5700 N/A 6900 11000 12000 100 6417487 Dissolved Silver (Ag) ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6418211 Dissolved Sodium (Na) ug/L 41000 N/A 13000 4300 4500 500 6417487 Dissolved Strontium (Sr) ug/L 240 N/A 720 610 630 20 6417487 Dissolved Thallium (TI) ug/L <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.20 6418211 Dissolved Tin (Sn) ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 6418211 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 6418211 Dissolved Uranium (U) ug/L 0.36 0.36 0.23 0.75 0.74 0.10 16418211 Dissolved Vanadium (V) ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 6418211 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) ug/L <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 3.0 6418211 N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit Page 2 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 132132016 Report Date: 2013/01/11 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: C13664.00 Sampler Initials: SS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC -MS (WATER) Success Through Science- Maxxam ID FF1127 FF1128 FF1129 FF1130 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 UNITS MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 RDL C Batch PW5670 PW5671 PW5672) (PW5673 Polycyclic Aromatics Benzo[a]pyrene equivalency ug/L <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 0.010 6414315 Acenaphthene ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6415140 Acenaphthylene ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6415140 Acridine ug/L <0.032 (1) <0.032 (1) <0.032 (1) <0.032 (1) 0.032 6415140 Anthracene ug/L <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 10.010 6415140 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(c)phenanthrene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 0.0075 6415140 Benzo[e]pyrene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Chrysene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 16415140 Dibenz(a,h)anthrace ne ug/L <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 0.0075 6415140 Fluoranthene ug/L <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 0.040 6415140 Fluorene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 10.0085 6415140 2 -Methylnaphthalene ug/L <0.10 (2) <0.10 (2) <0.10 (2) <0.10 (2) 0.10 6415140 Naphthalene ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6415140 Phenanthrene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Perylene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Pyrene ug/L <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.020 16415140 Quinoline ug/L <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.20 6415140 Surrogate Recovery (%) D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) % 99 99 105 102 N/A 6415140 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) % 99 96 106 102 N/A 6415140 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) % 107 103 112 105 N/A 6415140 TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) % 99 98 107 103 N/A 6415140 N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit ( 1) Reported to instrument MDL per client request. ( 2) Concentration of 1 -methylnaphthalene < 0.10 ug/L. Concentration of 1-Methylnapthalene determined via visual inspection of sample chromatograms by client request. Detection limit set equivalent to 2 -Methylnaphthalene. Page 3 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 6262016 Report Date: 2013/01/11 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: C13664.00 Sampler Initials: SS ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (WATER) Success Through Science- Maxxam ID FF1127 FF1127 FF1128 FF1129 FF1130 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 UNITS MW101 MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 RDL QC Batch (PW5670) (PW5670) (PW5671) (PW5672) (PW5673) Lab -Du Elements Dissolved Tungsten (W) ug/L <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 10 6421116 Dissolved Zirconium (Zr) ug/L <3.0 (1) <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 3.0 6421116 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit ( 1 ) Matrix Spike exceeds acceptance limits due to matrix interference. Reanalysis yields similar results. (Recovery:135%, Iimits:80-120%). Page 4 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 132B2016 Report Date: 2013/01/11 Success Through Science - MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: CB664.00 Sampler Initials: SS Package 1 Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt General Comments Revised report (2013/01/11): Reporting units for metal analysis have been changed to ug/L as per client's request. Results relate only to the items tested. Page 5 of 11 Ma am Quality Assurance Report Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Success Through Science- QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6415140 VP4 Matrix Spike D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 122 % 50-130 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 128 % 50-130 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 128 % 50-130 TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) 2012/12/11 125 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 120 % 50-130 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 119 % 50-130 Acridine 2012/12/11 117 % 50-130 Anthracene 2012/12/11 109 % 50-130 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 124 % 50-130 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 127 % 50-130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 127 % 50-130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 120 % 50-130 Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 123 % 50-130 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 120 % 50-130 Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 129 % 50-130 Chrysene 2012/12/11 123 % 50-130 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 117 % 50-130 Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 127 % 50-130 Fluorene 2012/12/11 123 % 50-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 118 % 50-130 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 109 % 50-130 Naphthalene 2012/12/11 102 % 50-130 Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 122 % 50-130 Perylene 2012/12/11 126 % 50-130 Pyrene 2012/12/11 113 % 50-130 Quinoline 2012/12/11 103 % 50-130 Spiked Blank D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 112 % 50-130 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 115 % 50-130 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 119 % 50-130 TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) 2012/12/11 113 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 98 % 50-130 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 100 % 50-130 Acridine 2012/12/11 94 % 50-130 Anthracene 2012/12/11 88 % 50-130 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 98 % 50-130 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 111 % 50- 130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 107 % 50-130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 95 % 50-130 Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 98 % 50-130 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 96 % 50-130 Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 103 % 50-130 Chrysene 2012/12/11 99 % 50-130 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 92 % 50-130 Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 102 % 50-130 Fluorene 2012/12/11 100 % 50-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 93 % 50-130 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 87 % 50-130 Naphthalene 2012/12/11 83 % 50-130 Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 99 % 50-130 Perylene 2012/12/11 101 % 50-130 Pyrene 2012/12/11 94 % 50-130 Quinoline 2012/12/11 92 % 50-130 Method Blank D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 86 % 50-130 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 86 % 50-130 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 91 % 50-130 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 6 of 11 Ma am MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Science- QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6415140 VP4 Method Blank TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) 2012/12/11 85 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Acridine 2012/12/11 <0.20 ug/L Anthracene 2012/12/11 <0.010 ug/L Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.0075 ug/L Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Chrysene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 <0.0075 ug/L Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 <0.040 ug/L Fluorene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Naphthalene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Perylene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.020 ug/L Quinoline 2012/12/11 <0.20 ug/L RPD Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Acridine 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Anthracene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Chrysene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Fluorene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Naphthalene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Perylene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Quinoline 2012/12/11 NC % 40 6417487 PKO Matrix Spike Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2012/12/14 94 % 80-120 Dissolved Boron (B) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 NC % 80-120 Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 97 % 80-120 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2012/12/14 101 % 80-120 Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2012/12/14 87 % 80-120 Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 93 % 80-120 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 7 of 11 Ma am MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Science- QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6417487 PKO Matrix Spike Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Spiked Blank Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2012/12/14 94 % 80-120 Dissolved Boron (B) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 97 % 80-120 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2012/12/14 91 % 80-120 Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 94 % 80-120 Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Method Blank Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2012/12/14 <10 ug/L Dissolved Boron (B) 2012/12/14 <20 ug/L Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 <300 ug/L Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 <60 ug/L Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 <200 ug/L Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 <4.0 ug/L Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2012/12/14 <100 ug/L Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 <300 ug/L Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2012/12/14 <100 ug/L Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 <500 ug/L Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2012/12/14 <20 ug/L RPD Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 0.3 % 20 Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 NC % 20 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 0.2 % 20 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 NC % 20 Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 0.8 % 20 Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 0.3 % 20 6418211 PW3 Matrix Spike [FF1127-01] Dissolved Aluminum (AI) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 83 % 80-120 Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 104 % 80-120 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 109 % 80-120 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 105 % 80-120 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 104 % 80-120 Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 90 % 80-120 Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 104 % 80-120 Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 105 % 80-120 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Spiked Blank Dissolved Aluminum (AI) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 89 % 80-120 Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 103 % 80-120 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 8 of 11 Ma am MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Science- QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6418211 PW3 Spiked Blank Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Tin (Sri) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 97 % 80-120 Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Method Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2012/12/12 <1.0 ug/L Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 <0.60 ug/L Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 <0.20 ug/L Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 <1.0 ug/L Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 <1.0 ug/L Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 <0.30 ug/L Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 <0.20 ug/L Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 <0.20 ug/L Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 <0.20 ug/L Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 <0.50 ug/L Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 <0.20 ug/L Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 <0.10 ug/L Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 <0.20 ug/L Dissolved Tin (Sri) 2012/12/12 <1.0 ug/L Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 <1.0 ug/L Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 <0.10 ug/L Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 <1.0 ug/L Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 <3.0 ug/L RPD [FF1127-01] Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 2.5 % 20 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 3.3 % 20 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Tin (Sri) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 6421116 ST4 Matrix Spike [FF1127-01] Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 113 % 80-120 Spiked Blank Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 95 % 80-120 Dissolved Zirconium (Zr) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Method Blank Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 <10 ug/L Dissolved Zirconium (Zr) 2012/12/12 <3.0 ug/L RPD [FF1127-01] Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Zirconium Zr 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 61`2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 9 of 11 Ma K.a m MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Scienceo Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 10 of 11 Ma K.a m Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job #: 6262016 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Jus r n Allan, BSc, Data Validation J,� G7 ov� Janet Gao, Senior Analyst, Organics Department Krist udet, B.Sc., P.Chem, Scientific Specialist Success Through Science - Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 11 of 11 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Page 9: 1 6710 Campobello Road Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 21_8 Terrapex Environmental Ltd - Phone: (905) 817-5700 Toronto Fax (905) 817-5777 ?55 Maxxam PM Maryam Arghartdeb SUBCONTRACTING REQUEST FORM To: Campo to (Calgary Subcontract Job# B2..12495 Yes .---No International Sample/BioHazard (ifyes, add copy of Movcment Cert., heat treat is required prior to disposal) Ll Yes N Special Protocol (ifyes, Protocol _ - ) Sampie ID Matrix Test(s) Re nixed Container Date Sampled Date Required PW5670-03R1MW101 W Low Level PAHs (CC -ME) 2(SVOC) 2012/12/05 2012.'12/13 PW5670-05R i MW 101 W CCME Metals (low Level). dissolved i(M) 2012/12/()5 2012/12/ 1.2 PW5671-03R 1 MW 102 W Low Level PAHs (CCME) 2(SVOC) 2412112/05 2012!12/13 PW5671-05R t MW102 W COME Metals (low Level), dissolved 1(M) 2012I12/05 2012/12/12 PW5672-03121 MW 103 W Low Level PAHs (CCME) 2(SVOC) 2012/12/05 2012/12/13 PW5672-05R 1 MW 103 W CCME Metals (low Level), dissolved 1(M) 2012/12/05 2012!12/12 PW5673-03R 1 MW I04 W Low Level PAHs (CCME) 2(SVOC) 2012112/05 2012112!13 PW5673-05R 1 MW 104 W CCME Metals (low Level), dissolved 1(M) 2012112/05 2012/12112 Tem _ 1 "Tem .2 'Tcmp� Cooicr1 (Custody Seal Present NO �1 ICustpdw_Seal Intact _ 10 1( lcc Present Upon Receipt I NO Cooler 42 C'ci�tc�dy Seal Present 1YES �NO — Custody Scal Intact �I_IT''7S NO ice Present Upon Recei.Rt YES NOi Cc Mer #3 Custody Seal Present YL'•S NO _Custody Seal Intact YES NO lice Present Upon Receipt YES NO Receiving Maxxam Location: Campo to Calgary Subcontract SOB P Relinquished by (Sign) (Pr1nt) Date and Time Received by (Sign) (Print) 1�1N-� 7 — Date and Timed Subcontract Comment PLEASE INCLUDE LOW LEVEL CD IN SUB-CCMEMED SCAN !'MOTES: 1) Please call us if duc date cannot be met. Please reference Sample ID on your report. 2) Include copy ofthis completed form,. Client COC & signed final report to scontractorriDmaxxamanalytics.com Rel2ortind Requirements_ National: Regional: M-aa mi740 GIMDOW-',a Road. Wosauga, ON L5N 2tg Kv, pnow, 905-617-57(x) fay m.017.5fn Tall free XQ553v* CHAINOF.CUST(, I RECORD 88221. ;lw —iof - L INVOICE INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION Il I diftefs ffam invorcol PROJECT INFORMARION MAXXAM 100 NUMBER ".NollleTLt r��1Ll1u, ,0�151 Nne po CHAIN OF CUSTODY 0 Al FiMf Fac 00 `MANDATORY SECTIONS IN GREY MAT BE FILLED 0101 AN INCOMPLETE CRAIN OF CUSTOCY MAY RESULT IN ANALYTICAL TAT DELAYS. I 91L- 9 Ma am Your Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Your C.O.C. #: 88221 Attention: Geoff Lussier Terrapex Environmental Ltd 49 Coldwater Rd Toronto, ON M3B 1Y8 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: B2J2495 Received: 2012/12/06, 12:50 Sample Matrix: Water # Samples Received: 6 Success Through Science - Report Date: 2012/12/17 Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. Results relate only to the items tested. ./2 Page 1 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Chromium (VI) in Water 4 N/A 2012/12/12 CAM SOP -00436 EPA 7199 Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Water 6 N/A 2012/12/11 CAM SOP -00315 CCME CWS Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water 6 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 CAM SOP -00316 CCME Hydrocarbons Hardness (calculated as CaCO3) 1 N/A 2012/12/11 CAM SOP 00102 SM 2340 B Hardness (calculated as CaCO3) 3 N/A 2012/12/12 CAM SOP 00102 SM 2340 B Mercury (low level) 4 2012/12/10 2012/12/11 CAM SOP -00453 EPA 7470 pH 4 N/A 2012/12/10 CAM SOP -00448 SM 4500H+ B Remarks: Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use in the laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) as outlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Reporting results to two significant figures at the RDL is to permit statistical evaluation and is not intended to be an indication of analytical precision. The CWS PHC methods employed by Maxxam conform to all prescribed elements of the reference method and performance based elements have been validated. All modifications have been validated and proven equivalent following the 'Alberta Environment Draft Addenda to the CWS-PHC, Appendix 6, Validation of Alternate Methods'. Documentation is available upon request. Maxxam has made the following improvements to the CWS-PHC reference benchmark method: (i) Headspace for F1; and, (ii) Mechanical extraction for F2 -F4. Note: F4G cannot be added to the C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. The extraction date for samples field preserved with methanol for F1 and Volatile Organic Compounds is considered to be the date sampled. Maxxam Analytics is accredited by SCC (Lab ID 97) for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actual cost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for three weeks from receipt of data or as per contract. RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. Results relate only to the items tested. ./2 Page 1 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 -2- Encryption Key Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Maryann Arghandeh, Email: mArghand@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5700 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 2 Page 2 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free: 800-563-6266 Fax_ (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ l rn Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF WATER Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS Maxxam ID PW5670 PW5671 PW5672 PW5673 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 Units I MW101 I QC Batch I MW102 I MW103 I MW104 1 RDL QC Batch Calculated Parameters I MW104 I MW104 Lab-Dup I RDL I QC Batch Metals Hardness CaCO3 m /L 300 3060687 510 690 680 1.0 3061025 Inorganics ND ND ND ND H pH 7.30 3063402 7.30 6.89 6.91 3063402 ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (WATER) Maxxam ID PW5670 PW5671 PW5672 PW5673 PW5673 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 Units I MW101 MW102 MW103 I MW104 I MW104 Lab-Dup I RDL I QC Batch Metals Chromium VI u /L ND ND ND ND ND 0.5 3064633 Mercury H u /L ND ND ND ND 1 0.01 3064911 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 3 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca N/I E _ l rn Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 O'REG 153 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (WATER) Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS Maxxam ID I PW5670 I PW5671 I PW5672 I PW5673 I PW5674 I PW5675 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 Units MW101 MW102 MW103 I MW104 I FIELD BLANK QC Batch RIP BLANK RDE QC Batch BTEX & F1 Hydrocarbons Benzene u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 0.20 3064000 Toluene u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 0.20 3064000 Eth (benzene u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 0.20 3064000 o -X lene u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 0.20 3064000 +m -X Iene u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 0.40 3064000 Total Xylenes u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 0.40 3064000 F1 C6 -C10 u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 25 3064000 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3063499 ND 25 3064000 F2 -F4 Hydrocarbons F2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3066093 ND 100 3066093 F3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3066093 ND 100 3066093 F4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) u /L ND ND ND ND ND 3066093 ND 100 3066093 Reached Baseline at C50 u /L YES YES YES YES YES 3066093 YES 3066093 Surrogate Recover 1,4-Difluorobenzene % 104 100 102 101 103 3063499 102 3064000 4-Bromofluorobenzene % 91 91 89 91 93 3063499 98 3064000 D10-Eth (benzene % 97 103 102 102 103 3063499 86 3064000 D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 100 101 101 103 100 3063499 95 3064000 o -Ter hen I % 99 100 98 98 95 3066093 96 3066093 ND = Not detected RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch Page 4 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam ID PW5670 Sample ID MW101 Matrix Water Test Descrintion Test Summary Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analvzed Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/06 Analvst success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS Chromium VI in Water IC 3064633 N/A 2012/12/12 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 3063499 N/A 2012/12/11 Haibin Wu Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water GC/FID 3066093 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 Zhi ue Frank Zhu Hardness calculated as CaCO3 3060687 N/A 2012/12/12 Automated Statchk Mercury low level CVAA 3064911 2012/12/10 2012/12/11 Lawrence Cheung H PH 3063402 N/A 2012/12/10 Yo esh Patel Maxxam ID PW5671 Sample ID MW102 Matrix Water Tpct npcerintinn Inctriimpntntinn Rntrh FYtrartPd Ang1v7Pd Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/06 Analvst Chromium VI in Water IC 3064633 N/A 2012/12/12 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 3063499 N/A 2012/12/11 Haibin Wu Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water GC/FID 3066093 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 Zhi ue Frank Zhu Hardness calculated as CaCO3 3061025 N/A 2012/12/11 Automated Statchk Mercury low level CVAA 3064911 2012/12/10 2012/12/11 Lawrence Cheung H PH 3063402 N/A 2012/12/10 Yo esh Patel Maxxam ID PW5672 Sample ID MW103 Matrix Water Test Descrintion Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analvzed Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/06 Analvst Chromium VI in Water IC 3064633 N/A 2012/12/12 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 3063499 N/A 2012/12/11 Haibin Wu Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water GC/FID 3066093 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 Zhi ue Frank Zhu Hardness calculated as CaCO3 3061025 N/A 2012/12/12 Automated Statchk Mercury low level CVAA 3064911 2012/12/10 2012/12/11 Lawrence Cheung H PH 3063402 N/A 2012/12/10 Yo esh Patel Page 5 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam ID PW5673 Sample ID MW104 Matrix Water Test Descrintion Test Summary Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/06 Instrumentation batch Extracted Analvzed Analvst Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS Chromium VI in Water IC 3064633 N/A 2012/12/12 Sally Coughlin Petroleum Hydro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 3063499 N/A 2012/12/11 Haibin Wu Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water GC/FID 3066093 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 Zhi ue Frank Zhu Hardness calculated as CaCO3 3061025 N/A 2012/12/12 Automated Statchk Mercury low level CVAA 3064911 2012/12/10 2012/12/11 Lawrence Cheung H PH 3063402 N/A 2012/12/10 Yo esh Patel Maxxam ID PW5673 Dup Sample ID MW104 Matrix Water Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Chromium NO in Water IC 3064633 N/A 2012/12/12 Sally Coughlin Maxxam ID PW5674 Sample ID FIELD BLANK Matrix Water Collected 2012/12/05 Shipped Received 2012/12/06 (Petroleum Hvdro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 3063499 N/A 2012/12/11 Haibin Wu I Page 6 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 Success Through Science- Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS Test Summary Maxxam ID PW5675 Collected 2012/12/05 Sample ID TRIP BLANK Shipped Matrix Water Received 2012/12/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Petroleum H dro. CCME F1 & BTEX in Wat HSGC/MSFD 3064000 N/A 2012/12/11 Anca Ganea Petroleum Hvdrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water GC/FID 3066093 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 Zhivue (Frank) Zhu Page 7 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA ] m Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 Package 1 5.3°C Package 2 1.7°C Package 3 2.0°C Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt GENERAL COMMENTS Page 8 of 10 success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA -El m Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Report Date: 2012/12/17 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT success Through SCienCe— Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Site Location: PORT BURWELL, ON Sampler Initials: SS N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit RPD = Relative Percent Difference Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. Page 9 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Matrix Spike Spiked Blank Method Blank RPD QC Batch Parameter Date °/ Recovery QC Limits % Recovery QC Limits Value Units Value °/ QC Limits 3063499 1 4-Difluorobenzene 2012/12/11 101 70-130 102 70-130 105 % 3063499 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/12/11 101 70-130 102 70-130 93 % 3063499 D10-Eth (benzene 2012/12/11 100 70-130 103 70-130 98 % 3063499 D4-1 2-Dichloroethane 2012/12/11 101 70-130 101 70-130 98 % 3063499 Benzene 2012/12/11 112 70-130 117 70-130 ND RDL=0.20 u /L 3063499 Toluene 2012/12/11 101 70-130 106 70-130 ND, RDL=0.20 u /L 3063499 Eth (benzene 2012/12/11 106 70-130 113 70-130 ND RDL=0.20 u /L 3063499 o -X lene 2012/12/11 105 70-130 110 70-130 ND RDL=0.20 u /L 3063499 +m -X lene 2012/12/11 93 70-130 96 70-130 ND RDL=0.40 u /L 3063499 F1 C6 -C10 2012/12/11 79 70-130 78 70-130 ND, RDL=25 u /L NC 30 3063499 Total Xylenes 2012/12/11 ND RDL=0.40 u /L 3063499 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX 2012/12/11 ND RDL=25 u /L NC 30 3064000 1 4-Difluorobenzene 2012/12/11 102 70-130 102 70-130 100 % 3064000 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2012/12/11 100 70-130 99 70-130 98 % 3064000 D10-Eth (benzene 2012/12/11 90 70-130 90 70-130 91 % 3064000 D4-1 2-Dichloroethane 2012/12/11 95 70-130 94 70-130 94 % 3064000 Benzene 2012/12/11 104 70-130 108 70-130 ND RDL=0.20 u /L NC 30 3064000 Toluene 2012/12/11 96 70-130 95 70-130 ND, RDL=0.20 u /L NC 30 3064000 Eth (benzene 2012/12/11 102 70-130 102 70-130 ND RDL=0.20 u /L NC 30 3064000 o -X lene 2012/12/11 94 70-130 95 70-130 ND RDL=0.20 u /L NC 30 3064000 +m -X lene 2012/12/11 89 70-130 88 70-130 ND RDL=0.40 u /L NC 30 3064000 F1 C6 -C10 2012/12/11 98 70-130 115 70-130 ND, RDL=25 u /L NC 30 3064000 Total Xylenes 2012/12/11 ND RDL=0.40 u /L NC 30 3064000 F1 C6 -C10 - BTEX 2012/12/11 ND RDL=25 u /L NC 30 3064633 Chromium VI 2012/12/12 104 80-120 99 80-120 ND RDL=0.5 u /L NC 20 3064911 Mercury H 2012/12/11 107 80-120 100 80-120 ND, RDL=0.01 u /L NC 20 3066093 o -Ter hen I 2012/12/11 100 50-130 102 50-130 99 % 3066093 F2 C10 -C16 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/12 104 50-130 97 70-130 ND RDL=100 u9/1- NC30 3066093 1`3 C16 -C34 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/12 96 50-130 86 70-130 ND RDL=100 u /L NC 30 3066093 IF4 C34-050 Hydrocarbons) 2012/12/12 103 50-130 110 70-130 ND, RDL=100 u /L NC 30 N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit RPD = Relative Percent Difference Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. Page 9 of 10 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free _ 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca NA El ?_<5 E] r—, Success Through Science - Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job M B2J2495 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Eva �q F� Ewa Pranjic, Scientific Specialist sj� Jeevaraj Jeevaratrnam, Senior Analyst c Mai i Salib, Analyst, Hydrocarbons Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5. 10.2 of ISOJEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 10 of 10 ifiaxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a iAaxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel- (905) 817-5700 Toll -Free. 800-563-6266 Fax (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Maxxam Sample: PW5672 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: MW103 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water Chromatogram '1k =rl�� 1::wp11�1=11 4 4-1 r c� c � r Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Maxxam Sample: PW5673 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: MW104 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water Chromatogram r Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Maxxam Sample: PW5674 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: FIELD BLANK Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water Chromatogram Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Maxxam Sample: PW5675 a.s Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: TRIP BLANK Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water Chromatogram r Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. lin f I " t 6740 Campobello Road, Mlssissauga, ON ON 21-6 C ' ��m Phone: 905 817-5700 Fax: 905-817-5779 Toll Free: (800) 563-6266 CHAIN OF CUSTC Y RECORD 88221 Page --jot / INVOICE INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION (If differs from Invoice) PROJECT INFORMATION MAXXAM JOB NUMBER Comonny Name:T27 '.W L Z'bompmfy Nama: NVIJ Ouoiatlon q: 1,1 Contact Name: rr L 16" Contact Name: P.O. a: CHAIN OF CUSTODY A Addmss: _ Address' Prolnct 0- 1,jq�_ �(� // N U WD Site Location: Phone 17 Fax: Phone: Fax: Site 4: 00 Ema'll: Small Sampled 9y: *'*Nate: For MOE Regulated Drinking Water samples, please use the Drinking Water WO."" ANALYSIS E&UESTED {Please be s " ' "'""' "^""" T"'° (TAT) REQUIRED 6 -Dee -12 12:50 '1E NOTICE FOR RUSH Regulation 153 (2011) Other Regulations � Maryann ."ttghaildeh Table 1 ReSlPur1 MetllFllea Sanitary Sower Bylaw Table 2 IndlComm Crafso Reg. 558 Storni Sewer BAw 40 111I II I1Il1111hIII H st tests) Txttle9 Agri/Other MISA 1% j I B2i2495 For ASG Municipality: a t �K � MAF ENV -983 Ipm to guarnntne your TAT.. Table Yes PWOO No Olher{spealty): Rush Uonlirmatron e: NN v 1 day 2 days E] 3 days Include Criteria on Certificate of Analysis (YIN)? Im a 5Dale Req'd: SAMPLES MUST BECOOL (<10'C) FROM TIME OF r rL SAMPLING UNTIL! ! i CC 0 0 1 Q " T S fcrP ca7takr festa rue > 5 [lays, Please caaraaf yaar Fmecl Manager far delai&. Sample Identification Date Sampled, Time _Sampled p Matrix (Gw. SW, Sou, oto l Con o COMMENTS I TAT COMMENTS 1 II d0 Y X X �f 4 / 41 5 F1 K 6731 p 7 9 10 T — 1 'RELINQ IS eY (SignaturelPrint) Date (YYYYIMMIDD) Time: REM VlED BY: (SlgaalurelPrint) Date (YYYYIMMIDD) Time: #JARS USED AND NOT SUBMITTED Laboratory Use Only Custody SlYosNo 7amperatL11PL Present lnecl 'MAN'DATORY SECTIONS IN GREY MUST BE FILLEI91;!T, AN INCOMPLETE CHAIN OF CUSTODY MAY RESULT IN ANALYTICAL TAT DELAYS, r t " - CM -1004 {091121 • ENV ENG. Ma"am Analyiks Inlamatlonal Carporaiian ala Masham Analylits 4hrta: Mamm allow Matl Pinki Client Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Maxxam Sample: PW5670 Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: MW101 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water Chromatogram r Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Report Date: 2012/12/17 Maxxam Job #: B2J2495 Maxxam Sample: PW5671 R.' Success Through Sciencee Terrapex Environmental Ltd Client Project #: CB664.00 Project name: PORT BURWELL, ON Client ID: MW102 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 -F4 in Water Chromatogram r Note: This information is provided for reference purposes only. Should detailed chemist interpretation or fingerprinting be required, please contact the laboratory. Ma am Your Project #: MB2J2495 Site Location: CB664.00 Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR MAXXAM ANALYTICS CAMPOBELLO 6740 CAMPOBELLO ROAD MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L5N 21-8 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS MAXXAM JOB #: 82132016 Received: 2012/12/11, 9:45 Sample Matrix: Water # Samples Received: 4 Success Through Sciencez, Report Date: 2012/12/17 Analyses Quantity Date Extracted Date Analyzed Laboratory Method Analytical Method Cadmium - low level CCME - Dissolved 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00043 EPA 200.8 Elements by ICP - Dissolved 4 N/A 2012/12/14 AB SOP -00042 EPA 200.7 Elements by ICPMS - Dissolved 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00043 EPA 200.8 Elements by ICPMS - Dissolved (Ext List) 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00043 EPA 200.8 Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalency 4 N/A 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00003 EPA 8270D Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (1) 2 2012/12/11 2012/12/11 AB SOP -00003 EPA 3510C/8270D AB SOP -00037 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (1) 2 2012/12/11 2012/12/12 AB SOP -00003 EPA 3510C/8270D AB SOP -00037 " RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. (1) B[a]P TPE is calculated using 1/2 of the RDL for non detect results as per Alberta Environment instructions. This protocol may not apply in other jurisdictions. Encryption Key loana Stoica 17 Dec 201214:45:56 -07:00 Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Carmen McKay, Project Manager Assistant Email: CMcKay@maxxam.ca Phone# (403) 291-3077 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Total cover pages: 1 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Max— Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 1 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 6262016 Report Date: 2012/12/17 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: C13664.00 Sampler Initials: SS REGULATED METALS (CCME/AT1) - DISSOLVED Success Through Sciencez, MaxxamID FF1127 FF1127 FF1128 FF1129 FF1130 Sampling Date Cadmium (Cd) 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 <0.0000050 0.0000050 6414304 UNITS MW101 MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 RDL QC Batch (PW5670) (PW5670) (PW5671) (PW5672) (PW5673) 0.0014 0.0022 0.0022 0.0010 6418211 Lab -Du Antimony (Sb) mg/L <0.00060 <0.00060 <0.00060 Low Level Elements Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) mg/L <0.0000050 N/A <0.0000050 <0.0000050 <0.0000050 0.0000050 6414304 Elements Dissolved Aluminum (Al) mg/L 0.0012 0.0012 0.0014 0.0022 0.0022 0.0010 6418211 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) mg/L <0.00060 <0.00060 <0.00060 <0.00060 <0.00060 0.00060 6418211 Dissolved Arsenic (As) mg/L 0.0033 0.0033 0.0084 0.0041 0.0045 0.00020 6418211 Dissolved Barium (Ba) mg/L 0.097 N/A 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.010 6417487 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0010 6418211 Dissolved Boron (B) mg/L 0.082 N/A 0.077 0.041 0.038 0.020 6417487 Dissolved Calcium (Ca) mg/L 100 N/A 190 200 210 0.30 6417487 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0010 6418211 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) mg/L 0.0011 0.0011 0.00075 0.00060 0.00063 0.00030 6418211 Dissolved Copper (Cu) mg/L <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00020 0.00073 0.00070 0.00020 6418211 Dissolved Iron (Fe) mg/L 4.3 N/A 7.7 20 22 0.060 6417487 Dissolved Lead (Pb) mg/L <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00020 0.00020 6418211 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) mg/L 12 N/A 13 28 29 0.20 6417487 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) mg/L 0.64 N/A 0.95 1.8 1.8 0.0040 6417487 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) mg/L 0.0041 0.0043 0.0047 0.00073 0.00064 0.00020 6418211 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) mg/L 0.0017 0.0018 0.00098 <0.00050 <0.00050 0.00050 6418211 Dissolved Phosphorus (P) mg/L <0.10 N/A <0.10 0.81 0.79 0.10 6417487 Dissolved Potassium (K) mg/L 2.3 N/A 2.8 4.9 5.2 0.30 6417487 Dissolved Selenium (Se) mg/L 0.00031 0.00025 <0.00020 0.00037 0.00036 0.00020 6418211 Dissolved Silicon (Si) mg/L 5.7 N/A 6.9 11 12 0.10 6417487 Dissolved Silver (Ag) mg/L <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 0.00010 6418211 Dissolved Sodium (Na) mg/L 41 N/A 13 4.3 4.5 0.50 6417487 Dissolved Strontium (Sr) mg/L 0.24 N/A 0.72 0.61 0.63 0.020 6417487 Dissolved Thallium (TI) mg/L <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00020 0.00020 6418211 Dissolved Tin (Sn) mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0010 6418211 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0010 6418211 Dissolved Uranium (U) mg/L 0.00036 0.00036 0.00023 0.00075 0.00074 0.00010 6418211 Dissolved Vanadium (V) mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0010 6418211 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) mg/L <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 0.0030 6418211 N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit Page 2 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 132132016 Report Date: 2012/12/17 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: C13664.00 Sampler Initials: SS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC -MS (WATER) Success Through Sciencez, MaxxamID FF1127 FF1128 FF1129 FF1130 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 UNITS MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 RDL C Batch PW5670 PW5671 PW5672) (PW5673 Polycyclic Aromatics Benzo[a]pyrene equivalency ug/L <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 0.010 6414315 Acenaphthene ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6415140 Acenaphthylene ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6415140 Acridine ug/L <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.20 6415140 Anthracene ug/L <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 10,010 6415140 Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Benzo(c)phenanthrene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 0.0075 6415140 Benzo[e]pyrene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Chrysene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 <0.0075 0.0075 16415140 Fluoranthene ug/L <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 0.040 6415140 Fluorene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/L <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 <0.0085 0.0085 6415140 2 -Methylnaphthalene ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6415140 Naphthalene ug/L <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.10 6415140 Phenanthrene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 16415140 Perylene ug/L <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.050 6415140 Pyrene ug/L <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.020 6415140 Quinoline ug/L <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.20 6415140 Surrogate Recovery (%) D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) % 99 99 105 102 N/A 16415140 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) % 99 96 106 102 N/A 6415140 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) % 107 103 112 105 N/A 6415140 TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) % 99 98 107 103 N/A 6415140 N/A = Not Applicable RDL = Reportable Detection Limit Page 3 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 6262016 Report Date: 2012/12/17 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: C13664.00 Sampler Initials: SS ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (WATER) Success Through Science,& MaxxamID FF1127 FF1127 FF1128 FF1129 FF1130 Sampling Date 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 2012/12/05 UNITS MW101 MW101 MW102 MW103 MW104 RDL C Batch (PW5670) (PW5670) (PW5671) (PW5672) (PW5673) Lab -Du Elements Dissolved Tungsten (W) mg/L <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 0.010 6421116 Dissolved Zirconium (Zr) mg/L <0.0030 (1) <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 <0.0030 0.0030 6421116 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit ( 1 ) Matrix Spike exceeds acceptance limits due to matrix interference. Reanalysis yields similar results. (Recovery:135%, Iimits:80-120%). Page 4 of 11 Ma am Maxxam Job #: 132132016 Report Date: 2012/12/17 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Client Project #: M132J2495 Site Location: CB664.00 Sampler Initials: SS Package 1 Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt General Comments Results relate only to the items tested. Page 5 of 11 Success Through Science,& Ma am Quality Assurance Report Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Success Through Sciencez, QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6415140 VP4 Matrix Spike D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 122 % 50-130 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 128 % 50-130 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 128 % 50-130 TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) 2012/12/11 125 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 120 % 50-130 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 119 % 50-130 Acridine 2012/12/11 117 % 50-130 Anthracene 2012/12/11 109 % 50-130 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 124 % 50-130 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 127 % 50-130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 127 % 50-130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 120 % 50-130 Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 123 % 50-130 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 120 % 50-130 Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 129 % 50-130 Chrysene 2012/12/11 123 % 50-130 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 117 % 50-130 Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 127 % 50-130 Fluorene 2012/12/11 123 % 50-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 118 % 50-130 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 109 % 50-130 Naphthalene 2012/12/11 102 % 50-130 Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 122 % 50-130 Perylene 2012/12/11 126 % 50-130 Pyrene 2012/12/11 113 % 50-130 Quinoline 2012/12/11 103 % 50-130 Spiked Blank D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 112 % 50-130 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 115 % 50-130 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 119 % 50-130 TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) 2012/12/11 113 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 98 % 50-130 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 100 % 50-130 Acridine 2012/12/11 94 % 50-130 Anthracene 2012/12/11 88 % 50-130 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 98 % 50-130 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 111 % 50- 130 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 107 % 50-130 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 95 % 50-130 Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 98 % 50-130 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 96 % 50-130 Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 103 % 50-130 Chrysene 2012/12/11 99 % 50-130 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 92 % 50-130 Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 102 % 50-130 Fluorene 2012/12/11 100 % 50-130 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 93 % 50-130 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 87 % 50-130 Naphthalene 2012/12/11 83 % 50-130 Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 99 % 50-130 Perylene 2012/12/11 101 % 50-130 Pyrene 2012/12/11 94 % 50-130 Quinoline 2012/12/11 92 % 50-130 Method Blank D10 -ANTHRACENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 86 % 50-130 D12-BENZO(A)PYRENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 86 % 50-130 D8 -ACENAPHTHYLENE (sur.) 2012/12/11 91 % 50-130 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 6 of 11 Ma am MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Sciencez, QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6415140 VP4 Method Blank TERPHENYL-D14 (sur.) 2012/12/11 85 % 50-130 Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Acridine 2012/12/11 <0.20 ug/L Anthracene 2012/12/11 <0.010 ug/L Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.0075 ug/L Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Chrysene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 <0.0075 ug/L Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 <0.040 ug/L Fluorene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.0085 ug/L 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Naphthalene 2012/12/11 <0.10 ug/L Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Perylene 2012/12/11 <0.050 ug/L Pyrene 2012/12/11 <0.020 ug/L Quinoline 2012/12/11 <0.20 ug/L RPD Acenaphthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Acenaphthylene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Acridine 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Anthracene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(a)anthracene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(c)phenanthrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo(a)pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Benzo[e]pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Chrysene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Fluoranthene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Fluorene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 2 -Methylnaphthalene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Naphthalene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Phenanthrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Perylene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Pyrene 2012/12/11 NC % 40 Quinoline 2012/12/11 NC % 40 6417487 PKO Matrix Spike Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2012/12/14 94 % 80-120 Dissolved Boron (B) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 NC % 80-120 Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 97 % 80-120 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2012/12/14 101 % 80-120 Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2012/12/14 87 % 80-120 Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 93 % 80-120 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 7 of 11 Ma am MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Sciencez, QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6417487 PKO Matrix Spike Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Spiked Blank Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2012/12/14 94 % 80-120 Dissolved Boron (B) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 97 % 80-120 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2012/12/14 91 % 80-120 Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 94 % 80-120 Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2012/12/14 98 % 80-120 Method Blank Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2012/12/14 <0.010 mg/L Dissolved Boron (B) 2012/12/14 <0.020 mg/L Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 <0.30 mg/L Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 <0.060 mg/L Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 <0.20 mg/L Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 <0.0040 mg/L Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2012/12/14 <0.10 mg/L Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 <0.30 mg/L Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2012/12/14 <0.10 mg/L Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 <0.50 mg/L Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2012/12/14 <0.020 mg/L RPD Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2012/12/14 0.3 % 20 Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2012/12/14 NC % 20 Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2012/12/14 0.2 % 20 Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2012/12/14 NC % 20 Dissolved Potassium (K) 2012/12/14 0.8 % 20 Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2012/12/14 0.3 % 20 6418211 PW3 Matrix Spike [FF1127-01] Dissolved Aluminum (AI) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 83 % 80-120 Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 104 % 80-120 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 109 % 80-120 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 105 % 80-120 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 104 % 80-120 Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 90 % 80-120 Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 104 % 80-120 Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 105 % 80-120 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Spiked Blank Dissolved Aluminum (AI) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 89 % 80-120 Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 103 % 80-120 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 8 of 11 Ma am MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Sciencez, QA/QC Batch Num Init QC Type Parameter Date Analyzed /mm/dd Value Recovery UNITS QC Limits 6418211 PW3 Spiked Blank Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 97 % 80-120 Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 102 % 80-120 Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 100 % 80-120 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 101 % 80-120 Method Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2012/12/12 <0.0010 mg/L Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 <0.00060 mg/L Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 <0.00020 mg/L Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 <0.0010 mg/L Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 <0.0010 mg/L Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 <0.00030 mg/L Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 <0.00020 mg/L Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 <0.00020 mg/L Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 <0.00020 mg/L Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 <0.00050 mg/L Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 <0.00020 mg/L Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 <0.00010 mg/L Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 <0.00020 mg/L Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2012/12/12 <0.0010 mg/L Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 <0.0010 mg/L Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 <0.00010 mg/L Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 <0.0010 mg/L Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 <0.0030 mg/L RPD [FF1127-01] Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2012/12/12 2.5 % 20 Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2012/12/12 3.3 % 20 Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Thallium (TI) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Uranium (U) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 6421116 ST4 Matrix Spike [FF1127-01] Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 113 % 80-120 Spiked Blank Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 95 % 80-120 Dissolved Zirconium (Zr) 2012/12/12 99 % 80-120 Method Blank Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 <0.010 mg/L Dissolved Zirconium (Zr) 2012/12/12 <0.0030 mg/L RPD [FF1127-01] Dissolved Tungsten (W) 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Dissolved Zirconium Zr 2012/12/12 NC % 20 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 9 of 11 Ma a m MAXXAM ANALYTICS Attention: SUB CONTRACTOR Client Project #: MB2J2495 P.O. #: Site Location: CB664.00 Quality Assurance Report (Continued) Maxxam Job Number: CB2B2016 Success Through Science,& Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate method Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency. NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and the spiked amount was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable recovery calculation. NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a reliable calculation. Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Calgary: 2021 - 41st Avenue N.E. T2E 6P2 Telephone(403) 291-3077 Fax(403) 291-9468 Page 10 of 11 Ma a m Validation Signature Page Maxxam Job #: 6262016 The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). ion ,�� C7 0,� Janet Gao, Senior Analyst, Organics Department Luba Shymushovska, Senior Analyst, Organic Department Success Through Science,& Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 11 of 11 alston associates inc. consulting engineers EMAIL Email to Raymond Ayuen, Email R.Ayuen@terrapex.com Material Classification Terrapex Environmental Address From Jonathan Bond Date 11 December 2012 Ref. No. 12-008 Page 1 of 4 Subject Laboratory Testing Smaller Medium and Fine Terrapex File CB664.00 Enclosed are the Grain Size Distribution Test Reports for the three soil samples received in our office on 22 November 2012. These analyses were carried out to classify the material according to the criteria in Ontario Regulation 153/04, Section 42.2 and were performed in general accordance with ASTM D422. Please note that the grain size curve and the material description is based only on the material smaller than 2 mm (#10 sieve). Our results are tabulated below. Sample No. Particles (by dry weight) N Smaller/Larger than 75 pm Material Classification MW101-3 96 Larger Coarse MW102-3 95 Larger Coarse MW103-2 79 Smaller Medium and Fine Regards. 85 citizen court, unit 1 telephone (905) 474-5265 markham, ontario fax (905) 474-2825 L6G 1A8 e-mail alston.associates@alston.ca Grain Size Distribution Report I[) N O D O OD O V' O N Iq M 7 100 O 0 90 10 80 20 70 30 M w 60 40 x M LL Z 50 i i i i i i i i 50 C7 W U 0 W 40 60 W M 30 70 20 80 10 90 0 100 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines +3„ Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay O 0 0 0 0 5 91 4 LL PL D Dign Din Dan D Dln C C11 0 0.2542 0.2023 0.1882 0.1603 0.1231 0.1025 1.24 1.97 Material Description USCS AASHTO O fine SAND, trace silt SP Project No. 12-008 Client: Terrapex Environmental Remarks: Project: Terrapex File C13664.00 00. Reg. 153 Grain Size Plot O Sample Number: MW101-3 alston associates inc, consulting el" g[ne2r5 Figure 1 Tested By: GL Checked By: JB Tested By: GL Checked By: JB Grain Size Distribution I[) N Report 100 O aD D N O C' OD N O V' N O N (V N IIO O M O 7 O O O 0 90 10 80 20 70 30 TM w 60 40 x z m LL Z Z 50 i i i i i i i i 50 C7 W U 0 ofx W 40 60 W M 30 70 20 80 10 90 0100 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines +3„ Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay O 0 0 0 0 14 81 5 LL PL D Dign Din Dan D D1n C C11 0 0.4078 0.2702 0.2425 0.1959 0.1590 0.1371 1.04 1.97 Material Description USCS AASHTO O fine SAND, trace silt Project No. 12-008 Client: Terrapex Environmental Remarks: Project: Terrapex File C13664.00 00. Reg. 153 Grain Size Plot O Sample Number: MW102-3 alston associates inc, consulting el" g[ne2r5 Figure 2 Tested By: GL Checked By: JB Tested By: GURH Checked By: JB Grain Size Distribution I[) N Report 100 O D O OD O V' O N 1q M 7 O 0 90 10 80 20 70 30 w 60 40 M x z m LL Z Z 50 i i i i i i i i 50 C7 W U 0 > W 40 60 W M 30 i i i i i i i i 70 20 80 0 10- 01 0 100 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines +3„ Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay O 0 0 0 0 0 21 64 15 LL PL Dgsi Dign Din D_qn D DIn C C11 0 0.0863 0.0449 0.0305 0.0092 0.0024 Material Description USCS AASHTO 0 SANDY SILT, some clay Project No. 12-008 Client: Terrapex Environmental Remarks: Project: Terrapex File C13664.00 00. Reg. 153 Grain Size Plot O Sample Number: MW103-2 alston associates enc, consulting el" g[ne2r5 Figure 3 Tested By: GURH Checked By: JB alston associates inc. consulting engineers EMAIL Email to Raymond Ayuen, Email R.Ayuen@terrapex.com Material Classification Terrapex Environmental Address From Jonathan Bond Date 20 December 2012 Ref. No. 12-033 Page 1 of 4 Subject Laboratory Testing Smaller Medium and Fine Terrapex File CB664.00 Enclosed are the Grain Size Distribution Test Reports for the three soil samples received in our office on 11 December 2012. These analyses were carried out to classify the material according to the criteria in Ontario Regulation 153/04, Section 42.2 and were performed in general accordance with ASTM D422. Please note that the grain size curve and the material description is based only on the material smaller than 2 mm (#10 sieve). Our results are tabulated below. Sample No. Particles (by dry weight) N Smaller/Larger than 75 pm Material Classification SED2-2 76 Smaller Medium and Fine SED6-1 100 Larger Coarse SED9-1 74 Smaller Medium and Fine Regards. 85 citizen court, unit 1 telephone (905) 474-5265 markham, ontario fax (905) 474-2825 L6G 1A8 e-mail alston.associates@alston.ca Grain Size Distribution N Report � eD N V N N (V O 100 O O 0 90 10 80 20 70 30 w 60 40 M x (7 Z m LL Z Z 50 50 C7 W C) 0 D W0 C/) 40 60 M 30 70 20 80 10 90 OL 100 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines %+3„ Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 63 13 LL PL Dgxi Dan Din D Dlg DIn C C11 0 0.0976 0.0444 0.0279 0.0093 0.0029 Material Description USCS AASHTO 0 SANDY SILT, some clay Project No. 12-033 Client: Terrapex Environmental Remarks: Project: Terrapex File CB664.00 00. Reg. 153 Grain Size Plot 0 Sample Number: SED2-2 4 lsto1 1 t...isJoc iatE)is inc. consulting engineers Figure 1 Tested By: AB/RH Checked By: JB Tested By: AB Checked By: JB Grain Size Distribution Report N � 100 eD N V N N N (V O O O 0 90 10 Eil� 1 80 20 70 30 M LU 60 40 x (7 Z m LL Z 50 50 C7 W C) 0 D W 0 40-60 M 30 70 20 80 10 90 0100 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines %+3„ Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 LL PL Dgsi Dan Din D Dl,,i DIn C C11 0 0.2597 0.2241 0.2130 0.1914 0.1720 0.1612 1.01 1.39 Material Description USCS AASHTO 0 SAND SP Project No. 12-033 Client: Terrapex Environmental Remarks: Project: Terrapex File C13664.00 00. Reg. 153 Grain Size Plot 0 Sample Number: SED6-1 4 lsto1 1 t...isJoc iatE)is inc. consulting engineers Figure 2 Tested By: AB Checked By: JB Tested By: AB/RH Checked By: JB Grain Size Distribution N � Report 100 eD N V N N N (V O O O O 0 90 i 10 80 20 70 30 w 60 M 40 x 0 Z m LL Z 50 50 C7 W CJ p D W 40 0 60 W M 30 70 20 80 10- 0 0 0 100 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines %+3„ Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 54 20 LL PL Dgsi Dan Din D D1,g DIn C C Q 0.1388 0.0333 0.0147 0.0042 Material Description USCS AASHTO O SANDY CLAYEY SILT (SANDY SILTY CLAY) Project No. 12-033 Client: Terrapex Environmental Remarks: Project: Terrapex File C13664.00 O Sample Number: SED9-1 alston associates enc, consulting engineers Figure 3 Tested By: AB/RH Checked By: JB APPENDIX XIV QUALIFICATIONS OF THE ASSESSORS QUALIFICATIONS OF THE ASSESSORS Terrapex Environmental Ltd.: Terrapex was founded by J. Michael Osborne, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., in March 1995 with the specific goal of providing specialized site assessment and remediation consulting services. Since that time, the firm has grown to a staff complement of approximately 40, with a total of three offices in Ontario. The Terrapex corporate head office is located in Toronto, and we have branch offices located in Burlington and Ottawa, Ontario. Our main areas of expertise are Phase I, II, and III Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), site remediations (in-situ and ex -situ), and peer reviews. In addition, Terrapex offers a range of associated services including: designated substance surveys; facility decommissionings; project management; expert witness services; groundwater modelling; tank management; and, air quality compliance monitoring. Our multi -disciplinary staff includes geologists, hydrogeologists, civil and environmental engineers, biologists, environmental scientists, technicians, and technologists. Terrapex operates under Certificate of Authorization No. 11684018 granted by Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO), and Certificate of Authorization No. 90100 granted by the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (APGO). In addition, Terrapex obtained ISO 9001:2000 registration for Environmental Consulting and Remediation Services in July 2003. As of July 2009, Terrapex has been registered with the new standard ISO 9001:2008, and continues to use this management tool to provide consistent, high quality services to our clients. Michael Osborne, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. — President/Senior Reviewer: Mr. Osborne graduated from Waterloo University with Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Civil Engineering (Water Resources). He has over 25 years of experience in the environmental industry, including two years as an environmental advisor at a petroleum company. Throughout his career, he has focused on the assessment and remediation of soil and groundwater impacts, and he has managed more than 1,500 projects, involving a wide range of organic and inorganic contaminants. As the founding principal of Terrapex, he has overseen the technical direction of all environmental projects conducted by the firm over the past 10 years. Mr. Osborne has also qualified as an expert witness and testified at criminal and civil court proceedings, Environmental Protection Act (EPA) hearings, and Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearings. Raymond Ayuen, Tech. Dipl., A.Sc.T. - Senior Environmental Technologist: Mr. Ayuen graduated from the Centennial College of Applied Arts and Technology in 1990 with a Design Technologist Diploma. Mr. Ayuen has been employed in the environmental industry for greater than 18 years, and his experience includes conducting Phase I, II, and III ESAs, monitoring programs, storage tank removal programs, designated substance surveys, compliance auditing, retail outlet decommissionings, and site remediation projects. Geoff L. Lussier, Dipl. - Project Manager. Mr. Lussier graduated from Sir Sanford Fleming College in 1994 with a Diploma in Terrain and Water Resources. He has been employed in the environmental industry for greater than 17 years, and his experience includes conducting and managing Phase I, II, and III ESAs, monitoring programs, storage tank removal programs, retail outlet decommissionings, site remediation projects, and geotechnical assessments. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. Page 1 Mark Van Oord, HON. B.Sc. — Environmental Scientist: Mr. van Oord graduated from McMaster University in 2005 with a Bachelor of Science degree in GeoScience. Mr. Van Oord has been employed in the environmental industry for greater than 5 years, and his experience includes conducting Phase I, II, and III ESAs, monitoring programs, storage tank removal programs, designated substance surveys, compliance auditing, retail outlet decommissionings, and site remediation projects. TERRAPEX ENVIRONMENTAL LTD. Page 2