Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08 - Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
, itoo Public Works and Government Services Canada March 2001 Enhanced Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Site No. 4766 Port Burwell, Ontario 4092 _ 11-4 i MacVLro r sI tirtg-Enti Yon men M y- I p: V Soh E rri% ENHANCED PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PORT BURWELL SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR SITE No.4766 PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO Prepared for: DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS and PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES CANADA Prepared by: MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 ALLSTATE PARKWAY, SUITE 600 MARKHAM, ONTARIO Tel: (905)475-7270 Fax: (905)475-5994 E-Mail: reception @ macviro.com March 2001 MacViro Project No.: 4092 Designing Environmental dr Energy Solutions Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell,Ontario--Site No.4766 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MacViro Consultants Inc. (MacViro) was retained by the Ontario Region of Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada to carry out an Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour(SCH)site in the Village of Port Burwell, Ontario (Site No. 4766). The subject site covers a total area of approximately 82 ha of mostly water near the shore of Lake Erie and Big Otter Creek. There are no associated buildings on the land portion of the property. A site location plan is presented in Appendix A. Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour was originally established as a small fishing wharf in the early 1830s. Over the years the harbour expanded and large quantities of lumber, shingles, staves and other commodities were shipped to Buffalo and Cleveland from the harbour. In the early 1900s,the harbour was used largely as a commercial fishing and coal shipping access point. The site is presently used as a recreational and commercial fishing access point, a community wharf and a harbour of refuge. The site consists of a breakwater, shore protection and wharves. The objectives of the Enhanced Phase I ESA are as follows: identify and document actual or potential contamination to assist in reducing the uncertainty regarding potential environmental liabilities;develop a National Classification System (NCS)score for the site,where required;develop an indicative estimate of liability for the site as per the Treasury Board requirements,where feasible; and provide the input data for the Real Property Information System for Contaminated Sites (RPISCS) Module. The assessment of the Port Burwell SCH (SCH Site No.4766)generally follows the procedures of a Phase I ESA, using Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Standard Z768-94 as a guideline. However, as an exception, a title search was not conducted as this exercise was found not to be practical. In addition, limited sampling and confirmatory testing of sediment and soils were carried out in accordance with PWGSC requirements. Information from the MOE and the Municipality of Bayham had not been received at the date of submission of this report. The response to this information request will be forwarded upon receipt. A site reconnaissance was performed by MacViro on January 17, 2001 for the subject site. Observations made during the site reconnaissance, historical records review and analytical testing of sediment and soil samples revealed minor concerns. Analysis of one soil sample collected on the beach property revealed concentrations of metals below the Ministry of Environment(MOE)and Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment(CCME) guideline limits for residential/parkland land-use in a non-potable groundwater situation. Analysis of six sediment samples revealed that concentrations of PAHs exceeded the "Interim Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines" (ISQGs), as outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, 1999(CEQG). Concentrations of Acenaphthene, phenanthrene, and pyrene concentrations exceeded the ISQGs at one of these locations. Concentrations of metals, nutrients and pesticides in sediment samples collected at the site were found to exceed sediment"Lowest Effect Lever(LEL)values as set out in the MOE Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment in Ontario, August 1993(PSQG). TOC concentrations at four locations, pp-DDE at two locations and copper, manganese,TKN and phosphorous at one location exceeded the LEL. The total ammonia concentration at one location exceeded the Open Water Disposal Criteria set in the PSQG. 4092-10 EX-11 MarchcViiro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 The results of the Phase I investigation indicate areas on the subject property where concentrations of metals, nutrients, pesticides and PAHs in sediment exceed the LELs in the PSQGs and/or the ISQGs in CEQGs. This may have potential implications with respect to future activities involving waterlot sediments, such as dredging. The sediment evaluation procedure outlined in the PSQGs indicates that sediment concentrations that exceed LELs should be compared with local background levels for that parameter. Therefore, it is recommended that background sediment samples be analyzed and the results compared to the sediment on the SCH property. In addition,consideration should be given to delineating the extent of the sediment impacts on and off the subject property. It should be noted that groundwater, surface water, and air were not sampled during the Phase I ESA. 4092-10 EX-2 �/� March 20001 MaCV ro Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No. 4766 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary EX-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES 1 2.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 RESEARCH 2 2.2 CONSULTATION 3 2.3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 3 2.4 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL TESTING 4 2.5 REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE 6 2.6 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS 8 3.0 GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 10 4.0 LAND USE PROFILE 11 4.1 LAND USE HISTORY 11 4.2 HERITAGE STATUS 13 4.3 LAND USE:ADJACENT PROPERTY 13 5.0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 15 5.1 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY 15 5.2 SOILS 15 5.3 SEDIMENT 16 5.4 SURFACE WATER 18 5.5 GROUNDWATER 18 6.0 BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 19 6.1 VEGETATION 19 6.2 FISH AND FISH HABITAT 19 6.3 WILDLIFE 19 7.0 STRUCTURES&IMPROVEMENTS 20 7.1 INVENTORY OF STRUCTURES 20 7.2 STRUCTURES- ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 21 7.3 EASEMENTS/SITE SERVICES 21 8.0 MATERIALS STORED, USED, OR DISCARDED 22 8.1 ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS 22 8.2 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 22 8.3 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE 22 8.4 NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE 22 8.5 PLACEMENT OF FILL, DREDGED MATERIALS 22 9.0 NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NCS)SCORE FOR CONTAMINATED SITES 24 • 10.0 INDICATIVE ESTIMATE OF LIABILITY OR CONTINGENT LIABILITY 24 11.0 REAL PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINATED SITES(RPISCS) MODULE 24 12.0 SUMMARY 25 13.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 26 4092-10 March 2001 cVnro Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No. 4766 LIST OF APPENDICES A Site Location Plan B Site Plan C Site Photographs D Aerial Photographs E Supporting Information F Correspondence G RPISCS Module Input Screens H References 4092-10 ii MacViro March 2001 1�11�I1 V Small Craft Harbours, Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 1.0 INTRODUCTION MacViro Consultants Inc. (MacViro) was retained by the Ontario Region of Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada to carry out an Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour(SCH)site in the Town of Port Burwell, Ontario (Site No. 4766). The subject site covers a total area of approximately 82 ha of mostly water near the shore of Lake Erie and Big Otter Creek, in the Village of Port Burwell. A site location plan is presented in Appendix A. The Port Burwell harbour was originally established as a small fishing wharf in the early 1830s. Over the years the harbour expanded and large quantities of lumber, shingles, staves and other commodities were shipped to Buffalo and Cleveland from the harbour. In the early 1900s, the harbour was used largely as a commercial fishing and coal shipping access point. The site is presently used as a recreational and commercial fishing access point, a community wharf and a habour of refuge. The site consists of a breakwater, shore protection and wharves. 1.1 Assessment Objectives The objectives of the Enhanced Phase I ESA are as follows: • Identify and document actual or potential contamination to assist in reducing the uncertainty regarding potential environmental liabilities. • Develop a National Classification System (NCS) score for the site, where required. • Develop an indicative estimate of liability for the site as per the Treasury Board requirements, where feasible. • Provide the input data for the Real Property Information System for Contaminated Sites (RPISCS) Module. In general, ESAs are completed in phases. The Phase I ESA typically involves research and records review, consultation and interviews, as well as visual site reconnaissance. A Phase I ESA report will indicate whether any further investigative work is needed to achieve an adequate environmental assessment of the property. A Phase II ESA generally includes a more detailed field investigation (subsurface sampling, analytical testing, etc.)in order to gain a better understanding of the environmental condition of the subject property. A Phase III ESA generally involves the remediation of environmental contamination on the subject property. The assessment of the Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour (Site No. 4766) generally follows the procedures of a Phase I ESA, using Canadian Standards Association (CSA)Standard Z768-94 as a guideline. However, as an exception, a title search was not conducted as this exercise was found not to be practical. In addition, limited sampling and confirmatory testing of sediment and soils were carried out in accordance with PWGSC requirements. This report presents the results of this assessment and provides conclusions regarding the environmental conditions existing at the site, based on the information presented, at the time of the site reconnaissance. Recommendations pertaining to the need for further environmental assessment are also provided, if required. 10 1 NaCl'® Mardi 2001 Small Craft Harbours,Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 2.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The evaluation of the site consisted of four basic components: background research;consultation with individuals and agencies associated with the property; a site reconnaissance (which included both visual evaluation and sampling); and analytical testing and interpretation of results. 2.1 Research Information was collected and reviewed from the following sources: ▪ Small Craft Harbours, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Regional Office,Burlington,Ontario • administration, operations, and maintenance files; transfer and survey plans; CAD site plans; site photographs;aerial photographs;title documents;and historical files. • Ministry of Natural Resources Information Centre,Toronto,Ontario aerial photographs. • Phase I Property Transfer Assessment. Site 4766, Port Burwell, Ontario, September 1997 Gartner Lee Limited Environmental and historical information Sediment quality information. • Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Map 2556,Quaternary Geology of Ontario,Southern Sheet(1991). • Waste Disposal Site Inventory(1991) Waste Management Branch,Ontario Ministry of the Environment(MOE) information on waste disposal sites,coal gasification and coal tar distillation plants. • National Inventory of PCB Waste Storage Sites (2000) Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Ministers information on polychlorinated biphenyl(PCB)storage sites. Copies of aerial photographs are provided in Appendix D. 4092-10 2 MaCVires Manch 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 2.2 Consultation In an effort to obtain information pertaining to the subject property and vicinity, the following agencies and/or individuals were contacted: • Ministry of the Environment, London Regional Office D.Thompson, Environmental Officer requested information on work orders or complaints related to environmental compliance pertaining to the subject site or nearby sites. • Archaeological and Heritage Planning, Ministry of Citizenship, Culture, and Recreation, Toronto John MacDonald,Heritage Planner and Robert von Bitter,Regional Archaeologist provided information on the archaeological status of the site. • Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Office F. Ruiter,Coordinator requested to provide information on environmental concerns, spills, charges/prosecutions, and Certificates of Approval. • Ministry of Natural Resources, Elmar District Office Dave Richards, Longpoint Area Biologist providedinformation by telephone on the presence of Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest(ANSI), wildlife species and hunting and fishing activity in the area. • Municipality of Bayham, Straffordville, Ontario K. Kruger Requested information on environmental quality of the site, spills, waste disposal, habitat, site services,pesticide use,heritage significance,regulatory history and proposed development. • Technical Standards and Safety Authority(TSSA), Fuels Safety Division, Etobicoke Carol Robyn, Public Information Services Coordinator advised MacViro that no records (including information on fuel storage tanks, past or existing environmental permits,existing environmental orders)are available for the subject site. Copies of correspondence are included in Appendix F. Information from the MOE, and the Municipality of Bayham had not been received at the date of submission of this report. 2.3 Site Reconnaissance The site was visited by MacViro field personnel on January 17, 2001. MacViro field personnel were unaccompanied during the site visit. Climatic conditions were overcast with moderate winds and light snowfall. Surface water was frozen (ice thickness 22 to 27 cm) and there was 100% snow cover during the site visit. General site characteristics were observed and documented, and a limited sampling program was conducted, as discussed in Section 2.4. A key plan and site plan are provided in Appendices A and B, respectively. Selected photographs taken during the site visit are presented in Appendix C. 4092-10 3 MaeVir0 March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 2.3.1 Health and Safety Plan A health and safety plan was maintained throughout the field program. All field workers were instructed on the protocols of the plan and the proper use of personal protective equipment. Worker health and safety standards were assured by following stringent safety precautions in accordance with the applicable sections specified under the Canada Labour Code and the Canada Health and Safety Act. Potential hazards for this project included working with machinery, working on ice surface, exposure to the cold and exposure to contaminated soil and sediment during inspection and sampling. 2.4 Sampling and Analytical Testing Sampling activities conducted while on site included the collection of six sediment samples and one soil sample. A powered ice auger was used to access the sediment through the ice cover. Surficial sediment samples were obtained at predetermined locations using a stainless steel Ponar sediment sampler. Three sub-samples were obtained at each location and composited in a stainless steel bucket in the field. The sediment was examined and observations regarding composition, grain size, colour, odour and signs of contamination were recorded. The sediment samples were transferred to pre- cleaned glassware supplied by the project laboratory. As the surface soils were frozen during the site visit, shallow soil samples were obtained using a pickaxe and stainless steel trowel. The sampling depth typically did not exceed 100 mm. The soil samples were transferred to pre-cleaned glassware supiffed by the project laboratory. The soil samples were examined in the field and observations regarding soil colour, texture, consistency, moisture content, and signs of contamination such as staining and odours were recorded. Field headspace tests were conducted upon all soil samples where petroleum hydrocarbons and/or volatile organic compounds were potential concerns. Headspace vapour concentrations were measured using a Gastech 1238 with a methane elimination switch. Sample analyses, locations,and field screening results are summarized in Sections 5.2.3 and 5.3.3. All samples were submitted to Philip Analytical Services Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, for analytical testing. 4092-10 4 Macy uro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 SAMPLE LOCATIONMATRIX 'ANALYSIS PERFORMED DESIGNATORS _ SED 1-1 11 m east of west wharf (east of Water sediment Tables 1,2a,2b, and 3 Polution Control Plant) of PSQG and Table I ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED 1-2 11 m east of west wharf(east of Talisman sediment Tables 1,2a, 2b, and 3 ASTs) of PSQG and Table 1 ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED 1-3 26 m west of concrete pier(north corner) sediment Tables 1,2a, 2b, and 3 of PSQG and Table 1 ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED 1-4 60 m north and 12 m west of concrete pier sediment Tables 1,2b,and 3 of (north corner) PSQG and Table 1 ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED 1-4X Duplicate of SED 1-4(for QA/QC sediment Tables 1,2b,and 3 of purposes) PSQG and Table 1 ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED 1-5 23 m west of east concrete and steel dock sediment Tables 1 and 3 of (southwest corner) PSQG and Table 1 ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED 1-6 18 m west and 38 m north of east concrete sediment Tables 1 and 3 of and steel dock (northwest corner) PSQG and Table 1 ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SOIL 1-1 55 m east of Robinson Street road soil MOE Inorganics allowance on east beach property NOTE: PSQG=Ontario Ministry of Environment Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario (August 1993) The laboratory Certificates of Analysis are included in Appendix E. Sediment and soil sample locations are plotted on the site plan provided in Appendix B. 2.4.1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) A quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)program was implemented to address the office and field programs. All project documentation was maintained and controlled under each specific site file with a unique site file identifier. As a minimum,samplers were washed and rinsed with soap and water before collecting subsequent samples to reduce the risk of cross-contamination between sampling. For all sampling locations,logs containing all pertinent information were prepared (Ref.:Appendix E-6)and collected samples were 4os2-ro 5 March 2001 AaJl�l.�'V) r® Small Craft Harbours,Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 placed in appropriate containers immediately upon retrieval. Soil classification was completed in accordance with applicable sections of the Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM). Field sampling and equipment decontamination was completed in accordance with applicable Environment Canada protocols and applicable industry practices. All laboratory chemical analyses were performed by an analytical laboratory that is accredited by the Canadian Association for Environmental Analytical Laboratories (CAEAL). Soil samples were collected using a stainless steel hand trowel, placed in individual 250 mL glass jars, identified and logged for physical properties. Duplicate soil samples utilized for screening purposes were collected and sealed in plastic bags (double bagged). Soil samples were selected for laboratory analysis based on visual and olfactory observations,combined with screening results. Sediment and soil samples were obtained from several SCH sites during this assessment and - - shipped together to the project laboratory as a single submission. One duplicate sediment sample.__ was collected for each submission for QA/QC purposes. A QA/QC co-ordinator was assigned to the project to ensure that all samples had the proper field identification and sample location. The QA/QC co-ordinator also completed the chain of custody forms, releasing selected samples to the laboratory for analysis. A chain of custody form accompanied the samples at all points of handling. Samples were preserved until delivered to Philip Analytical Services Inc., Mississauga, Ontario for laboratory analysis. 2.5 Regulations and Guidelines for Environmental Compliance Analytical results of samples collected on-site and the compliance status of various environmental issues were only compared to the relevant regulations and/or guidelines selected from the items listed and described below. Ontario Regulation (0. Reg.) 346/90 stipulates that no person shall cause EMISSIONS ', or permit to be caused the emission of any air contaminant to such a "-•. degree as may: - - ' ' -cause discomfort to persons • °`` -cause loss of enjoyment of normal use of property • `- - interfere with normal conduct of business -cause damage to property Certificates of Approval are issued by the MOE stipulating the maximum acceptable contaminant discharge from the emissions source. 4March092-10 6 �[f.Cw]L]CO 4092-2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario-Site No.4766 2.5.2 ;ASBESTOS Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) DM Directive 057 - Asbestos Management outlines procedures for the evaluation of ACMs and recommendations for control. The Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL)considers any material which contains greater than 0.5%asbestos fibre (by Polarized Light Microscopy method)to be an asbestos-containing material for the purposes of application of the requirements of the Regulation Respecting Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings . and Repair Operations(0. Reg. 838/90, as amended by O. Reg.510/92). Disposal of asbestos waste is governed by O. Reg. 347190. The Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act and Regulations prescribe additional requirements related to the transportation of asbestos waste. FUEI Aboveground tanks or tank systems are governed by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment's (CCME's) Environmental Code of :.TANKS .` Practice for Aboveground Storage Tank Systems Containing Petroleum Products CCME-EPC-LST-71 E August 1994). The Code of Practice y;: '. '" ° applies to all outside aboveground storage tank systems with a capacity of more than 230 L used for the storage of petroleum products, including gasoline, diesel fuel, aviation fuel, kerosene, naphtha, lubricating oil, fuel • oil and engine oil, but excluding propane, paint and solvents. Any tank or • -. tank system having a capacity greater than 4,000 L must be registered with • the authority having jurisdiction. Underground tanks or tank systems are governed by the CCME's Environmental Code of Practice for Underground Storage Tank Systems Containing Petroleum Products(CCME-EPC-LST- - 71E, August 1994). The Code of Practice applies to all underground ' - storage tank systems containing petroleum products and allied petroleum '�;: ,: ;:• products. Any underground storage tank system must be registered with the authority having jurisdiction. Tank systems containing fuel oil for • d••�; • heating or emergency power generation must also be constructed, installed Y': ' and maintained in accordance with CAN/CSA-B139-00, Installation Code for Oil-Burning Equipment 244.4 . '' : The Federal Hazardous Products Act(1976) limited the quantity of lead • :- PAM- permissible in newly manufactured paints to 0.5% (5,000 ppm). Paints having a lead content greater than 0.5% are thus considered to be lead- based. Lead is a designated substance under the Ontario Occupational Health ',_„ and Safety Act (0. Reg. 843/90, as amended by O. Reg. 519/92 and `:,;: •. O. Reg. 389100). While it does not strictly regulate lead-based paint, the Regulation respecting Lead sets limits on exposure to airborne lead for • workers in industrial operations. aos2-1a 7 March 2001 M�4('V11�® Small Craft Harbours,Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario Site No.4766 2.5.5. OZONE- The Federal Halocarbon Regulations assist in the development of strategic ., DEPLETING plans for the use, control and phase-out of ODSs and their halocarbon SUBSTANCES alternatives for operations under federal jurisdiction. In addition, the (ODSs): Montreal Protocol is an international agreement for the reduction and • elimination of the use of ODSs. Maintenance of. ODS containing equipment is regulated by the federal Environmental Code of Practice for •s the Elimination of Fluorocarbon Emissions from Refrigeration and Air s;, .: • • Conditioning Systems. Provincial regulations under the Ontario Environmental Protection Act include: O. Reg. 356 (ODS regulation in • . general); O. Reg. 189/94 (refrigerants regulation); O. Reg.413/94 (halon • fire extinguishing equipment); O. Reg. 717/94 (solvents regulation); and O. Reg.718/94 (sterilants regulation). ; .*. Equipment containing solids or fluids with a polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) • •CONTAINING concentration greater than 50 ppm is considered to be PCB-containing. • :EQUIPMEN T There is no regulatory requirement to remove PCB-containing equipment from service, however, a review of regulatory requirements (0. Reg. ' ": 362/90, SOR/92-507 Canadian Environmental Protection Act) should be undertaken for all PCB-containing equipment present and the equipment should be properly identified and labeled. Soil sample analytical results were compared to the residentiaVparkland • land use criteria in the Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) Guideline , mak.; '. :• • for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario (September 1998) and the residentiaVparkland land use criteria in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999). ass SEDIMENT ;:; Sediment sample analytical results were compared to the Lowest Effect : . Level (LEL) criteria outlined in the Guideline for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario(August 1993), and to the Table 1 Interim Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) • outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999). 2.5.9: POTABLE No potable water samples were analyzed during this assessment. " WATER 2.6 Assessment Limitations (i) A title search and legal survey of the subject property were beyond the scope of this environmental assessment. Therefore, all information regarding the property description is based on existing information, which is presumed to be accurate. (ii) The intent of this report is to provide coverage of the entire area of the subject site at the Port Burwell SCH. However, the site reconnaissance focussed on areas of the site where the presence of environmental risks associated with the subject site were deemed more likely. Due to the presence of significant snow cover at the time of the site visit, observations of potential environmental concerns were limited. Additionally,sampling was conducted only for the accessible areas of the subject site. For example, sediment sampling could not be conducted in areas with insufficient ice thickness, such as the area of the property located at the mouth of Big Otter Creek and areas of the property on Lake Erie. 4092-10 8 MacVir® Manch 2001 A�JL Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1•Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 (iii) Since site activities are beyond our control and can change at any time after the completion of this assessment, the observations, findings and opinions can be considered valid as of the date hereof. 4092-10 9 .aieViro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment= Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No. 4766 3.0 GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1..COMMON NAME Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour 2. CFI SITE NO. 4766 FEpI_RAL. ' 54022 (main harbour) & 73058 (access Road)DIFiECTCQRY'OF RF�!' P O ERr .(DFRP) REF:# 4:• WC** •PROVINCE. Ontario _ _ f WATERWAY Big Otter Creek (Lake Erie) t REGtQtV bl #t :County of Elgin ° . MDtJ1CIPPd T�! Municipality of Bayham °ApD1TIdNAL Village of Port Burwell 5:G.EO%COORDINATES ' >n ~ , Lat.: 42° 63' 98.5" N LONG.: 80°80'56.5"W fi,fllOiY°DI=Scl3lll'ION ;` Waterlot and land in Lake Erie and of Big Otter Creek, being f,• in front of Lots 11 and 12, Conc. 1,Township of Bayham, y= - part of the said Lots now being in the Village of Port Burwell, • as outline on Plan Number T1799. "• ' °° ` • .. Part of Lot 11, Conc.1, Plan D-606. Lands situated in the • Village of Port Burwell, Parts 1 and 2, Plan 11R-5137 and Parts 1, 2 and 3, 11R-5136. Parcel of land being Part 1 on Plan 11R-6733. 7:.TOTAL PelOPE !AI IEA' .•• Approximately 81.619 ha 8.:OM 5TI CT'r ES'. Channel entrance, basin, breakwater, concrete wharf, steel . S.. �t r harbour wall (west side),timber wharf,timber wharf ferry slip, steel harbour wall (east side), timber fisherman's wharf, and ` * ` rock shore protection Seasonal GO- t'ODIAN . Small Craft Harbours, Central and Arctic Region Department of Fisheries and Oceans. 4092-10 10 l�JLi AfacV' ro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central 8 Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 4.0 LAND USE PROFILE 4.1 Land Use History The following briefly summarizes the history of land use at the subject property, as determined from files maintained at Small Craft Harbours Offices in Burlington, Ontario, provided by SCH staff, and the sources noted in Section 2.0. Heavy siltation of the harbour has been an ongoing problem at the harbour since the mid-1800's. The SCH files indicate continual dredging at the site has occurred almost every year. l?ATe; . . . -LA4V[k UsEINOT. E EVEN',"°- _ ••••• ,, •-"I 1840 Construction of the small wharf for fishing. Dredging of harbour(see note above). 1890's— Major improvements to wharf for coal shipping. early 1900's 1903 Construction of concrete face of west shore wall. 1904 Construction of portion of east shore wall (steel sheet pile), east pier(concrete • superstructure on timber crib),west shore wall (steel sheet pile)and west pier (concrete face wall on timber pile). 1912 Construction of rubble mound and concrete breakwater(concrete superstructure on filled timber crib). 1921 Replacement of rubble mound(constructed in 1912). 1924 Repairs to concrete breakwater(constructed in 1912). 1926 Replacement of east pier with concrete superstructure on timber crib. 1929 Repairs to rubble mound. 1931 Construction of rubble mound breakwater(concrete superstructure on timber cribs). 1935 Replacement of concrete face wall of timber pile west pier(constructed in 1904). 1949 Replacement of portion of west shore wall (constructed in 1904)with steel sheet pile. 1951 Replacement of portion of east shore wall (constructed in 1904)with steel sheet pile and concrete face of west shore wall(constructed in 1903). 1952 Repairs to rubble_mound breakwater(constructed in 1931). 1958 Repairs to rubble mound breakwater(constructed in 1931). 1960 Replacement of portion of east shore wall with steel sheet pile and a concrete cap. 1962 Construction, on the east side,of a timber superstructure fisherman's wharf with timber bents,timber access stairs and timber ice fence. 1966 Replacement of portion of west shore wall (constructed in 1904)with steel sheet pile. 1967 Repairs to concrete face of west shore wall. 1973 Transfer of property to SCH from Transport Canada. 1974 2400'rubble mound breakwall constructed. 1974-75 1800 lineal feet of shoreline protected by rubble shore construction. 1977 SCH assists Village of Port Burwell in purchase of hydraulic dredge and equipment for annual maintenance dredging. 1978-79 600 lineal feet of shoreline protected by rubble shore construction. 1983 SCH resumes responsibility for dredging as Village unable to maintain channel with existing equipment. 4092-10 11 March 2001 `('��® Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 DATE LAND USE/NOTABLE EVENT • 1995 Sediment testing by Long Point Region Conservation Authority, indicated only 2 sediment samples slightly exceeded LEL criterion for TKN. 1997 Infilling behind armourstone done by Township of Bayham to stabilize shoreline. 1999 Dredging (on west side of entrance channel) undertaken by Township of Bayham. 2000 Dredging (50'x 10'trench on west side of harbour southerly to lake) undertaken by Talisman Energy Inc. by side-casting 12,000 yds3 of material (material meets criteria for residentiaVparkland and industriallcommercial uses in non-potable groundwater conditions). Present ■ harbour operates as recreational fishing access point for shallow draft, thoroughfare for commercial fishing vessels that berth upstream,commercial gaswell maintenance,community wharf and harbour of refuge. Future • harbour to continue operating as recreational fishing access point for shallow draft, thoroughfare for commercial fishing vessels that berth upstream, commercial gaswell maintenance, community wharf and harbour of refuge. The following environmental issues were investigated and no historical or current concerns were identified: • Air emissions • Asbestos • Lead • Mercury(elemental) • ODSs PCBs • Wastewater is • Potable water supply • Hazardous materials/waste • Non-hazardous debris There is a fuel facility located on the east shore adjacent to the federal property. The previous Phase I PTA completed for the SCH in 1997 by Gartner Lee Limited recommended testing of soil samples in the area of the facility as well as investigating whether the facility complies with provincial legislation. However,the facility is located adjacent to the federal property,therefore SCH would not be responsible for the facility or potential cleanup issues. The issues relate to the potential for the presence of surface or subsurface contamination from events associated with operational activities such as fuel spills. These concerns are outlined in the following table. 4092-10 12 M[2t.CVH•® March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 KNOWN/POTENTWL • ACTUAL/POSSIBLE USAGE ENVIRONMENTAL CoNc RN HYDROCARBON • A large oil tank capable of storing 600,000 gallons of fuel was established CONTAMINATION adjacent to the harbour in 1948. The tank was located on the west side of the Big Otter Creek however there is no specific information on when the tank was removed. Spill events may have been associated with storage and handling operations over the years. ■ Fuel facility located on the east harbour adjacent to the federal property may have potential contamination concerns. Spill events may be associated with storage and handling operations over the years. • Coal was loaded on ships in the harbour and transported through the channel to other locations along Lake Erie. METALS • Coal was loaded on ships in the harbour and transported through the channel to other locations along Lake Erie. OTHER CONCERNS • Large quantities of coal and phosphate fertilizer were trafficked through the harbour during the early to mid-1900s. • Sewer outfall for municipal water pollution control plant discharges onto SCH property. In order to establish whether any past problems with respect to environmental compliance have been recorded by the MOE, Mr. Fred Ruiter of the Freedom of Information (FOI) and Protection of Privacy office was asked to review any files pertaining to this site. A review of files is being conducted and a response is still outstanding. 4.2 Heritage Status Heritage status of federal buildings is not an issue since the federal property is a waterlot with no Federal buildings present on the property. MNR has indicated that there are no shipwrecks or historic values on the lakebed within the federal property. Most archaeological resources (both documented and unexplored, but considered to have high potential) are catalogued and protected by the provincial Ministry of Citizenship, Culture, and Recreation (MCZCR). The Ministry was contacted and has indicated that, based on the heritage databases and mapping of the Ministry, the subject property does not contain archaeological resources,which could potentially be negatively impacted through alterations to the subject property (Appendix F). Based on information obtained during the review of Small Craft Harbour files, no specific or comprehensive land claims are present and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada does not recommend consultation for activities related to this federal property. 4.3 Land Use: Adjacent Property While reviewing the land use history of the subject property, past and present land uses on adjacent properties were also examined with respect to the potential for off-site impacts. The key plan and site plan provided in Appendices A and B, respectively, should be consulted to assist in interpretation. The following table summarizes adjacent land use. 4092-10 13 7�� March 2001 1�JLaQ'l7Ilr® Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 DESCRIpTION•OF • PAST OWNER/USE PRESENTOWNER/USE. ' • ADJACENT LANDS ., . NORTH Otter Creek channel MNR waterlot and leased to Residential and commercial. and the urban area Township for Black Dock marina of Port Burwell facilities. WEST Shoreline of Otter Lands are private and publicly Water Polution Control Plant,Talisman Creek channel owned,from southern end to Energy(gas company),open northern end of channel,various space/recreational land ownerships include: Province for Port Burwell Provincial Park;Talisman Energy; 345990 Ontario Limited and leased to Township(with sub-lease to Talisman Energy for pipe-pulling)and others leased to local business operators; and 2 properties of Township for sewer outfalls. EAST Shoreline of Otter Lands are private and publicly Commercial Creek channel owned,from southern end to northern end of channel various land ownerships are:Township's • large waterlot;345990 Ontario Limited with portions leased by Township and Port Burwell Fishin s Corn•an . SOUTH open waters of Lake commercial and recreational Open water(Lake Erie). Commercial and Erie navigation and fishing recreational navigation and fishing Ma�2001 i4a1CVIlro Small Craft Harbours, Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 5.0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 5.1 Geology and Topography 5.1.1 GEOLOGY The surficial soils in the general area are glaciolacustrine deposits consisting predominantly of silt and clay and minor sand which includes basin and quiet water deposits. 5.1.2 Snt The subject site is predominantly a water lot. The site topography is relatively flat TOPOGRAPHY with a slight slope towards Lake Erie. 5.2 Soils 5:2:1:.•. PHYSICALSamples collected suggest that local soils are predominantly a fine to medium- ' ':�3. DESCRIPTION • textured, brown,sandy silt. 5:2:2 a USE ' - The land portion of the property is located on the north shore of Lake Erie and is used as a public beach. Residential/parkland landuse was selected for the purpose of comparison of results of soil sample analysis with generic cleanup criteria, since this is considered to represent the most likely future landuse scenario, and also since ." this part of the site is currently used, on a seasonal basis, as a public beach. 5.23 • SOIL a. Location* Description Analysis Conducted Summary of Results (Sample Designator) SOIL 1-1 • 55 m east of Robinson • MOE inorganics • all results are below the Street road allowance on MOE") Table B and east beach property CCME2 guideline limits NOTE: Sample locations are presented on the site plan in Appendix B. Analytical results are presented in Appendix E-4. Laboratory reports are also provided in Appendix E. MOO) Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy "Guideline for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario" September 199& Table B: Surface Soil Remediation Criteria for Residential/Parkland Land Use for Non- Potable Groundwater Conditions;Table F: Ontario Typical Range$oil Concentrations(Background) CCME(2 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment"Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines" 1999. Chapter 7: Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health (Residential/Parkalnd Land Use). 4092-10 15 Matth 2007 M�.�•Viro Small Craft Harbours,Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontatio—Site No.4766 5.3 Sediment 5.3.1 LOCATION&EXTENT Surficial sediment samples were obtained on the SCH property along { Otter Creek. 5.3,2 ' ;PHYSICA[;DESCRIPTION The sediment in Otter Creek was observed to be predominantly • comprised of brown,very fine to medium grained silty sand. 5:3.3 •SEDIMENT QUUALITYINFORMAT1otd • • • Location* Description Analysis Conducted Summary of Results (Sample (i.e., values that exceed Designator) criteria)** SED1-1 • 11 m east of west wharf • Tables 1,2a,2b,and 3 • TOC—1% (east of Water Polution of PSQG** and Table • ,,Acenaphthene-- Control Plant) 1 ISQGs in the CCME 0.007 pg/g CEQGs • Phenathrene-0.076µg/g • Pyrene-0.079µg/g SED1-2 • 11 m east of west wharf • Tables 1,2a,2b,and 3 Copper—19µg/g (east of Talisman ASTs) of PSQG and Table 1 • Manganese—484µg/g ISQGs in the CCME • TOC—2.5% CEQGs • TKN—1170µgig • Phosphorus—823µg/g • Total Ammonia—126µg/g • pp-DDE—0.014µgig SED1-3 • 26 m west of concrete • Tables 1,2a,2b, and 3 • TOC—1.1% pier(north corner) of PSQG and Table 1 • pp-DDE—0.007µg/g ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED1-4 • 60 m north and 12 m west , Tables 1, 2b, and 3 of • Does not exceed criteria of concrete pier (north PSQG and Table 1 corner) ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED1-5 • 23 m west of east • Tables 1, 2b, and 3 of • Does not exceed criteria concrete and steel dock PSQG and Table 1 (southwest corner) ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs SED1-6 • 18 m west and 38 m north • Tables 1, and 3 of ■ TOC 1.3% of east concrete and steel PSQG and Table 1 dock(northwest corner) ISQGs in the CCME CEQGs NOTE; * Sample locations are presented on the site plan in Appendix B. Analytical results are presented in Appendix E-1, E-2 and E-3. , Laboratory reports are also provided in Appendix E. ** Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment in Ontario,August 1993 *** Parameter exceeds the Lowest Effect Level(LEL) in the PSQGs or Interim Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) in the CCME CEQGs 4092-10 16 LaC iro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central & Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 A duplicate sediment sample (SED1-4X), obtained from this property, was shipped to the project laboratory along with the other samples obtained from Port Burwell SCH and was analyzed for QA/QC purposes. The average concentrations of PAHs were below the detectable limit in both the original sample (SED1-4) and the duplicate sample. The metal concentrations of duplicate sample were within 0.06% of the reported concentrations of the original sample. These concentration variances are within the acceptable limits of f/-20%for this sampling program. As outlined in the preceding table, a few concerns are apparent from the analytical results: • Copper Copper was detected at a concentration of 19 pg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-2, which is in excess ef: • The PSQG Table 1 LEL value of 16 p.g/g • TOC Total Organic Carbon (IOC)was detected at a percentage of 1%at sediment sample location SED 1-1, 2.5% at sediment sample location SED 1-2, 1.1% at sediment sample location SED 1-3 and 1.3% at sediment sample location SED 1-6. These TOC percentages are in excess of: • The PSQG Table 1 LEL value of 1% • TKN Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)was detected at a concentration of 1170 pg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-2,which is in excess of: • The PSQG Table 1 LEL value of 550 pg/g • Manganese Manganese was detected at a"concentration of 484 pg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-2,which is in excess of: • The PSQG Table 1 LEL value of 460 pg/g • Phosphorus Phosphorus was detected at a concentration of 823 pg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-2,which is in excess of: • The PSQG Table 1 LEL value of 600 pg/g • Total Ammonia Total Ammonia was detected at a concentration of 126 pg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-2,which is in excess of: • The PSQG Table 3 value of 100 pg/g 4o92-ro 17 MacViiro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours,Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 • pp-DDE pp-DDE was detected at a concentration of 0.014µg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-2,and 0.007 pg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-,1! These concentrations are in excess of: 3 • The PSQG Table 2a LEL value of 0.005µg/g • Acenaphthene Acenaphthene was detected at a concentration of 0.007µg/g at sediment sample location SED 1-1,which is in excess of: • The CCME Table 1 ISQG value of 0.00671 u.g/g • Phenanthrene Phenanthrene was detected at a concentration of 0.0761.4g at sediment sample location SED 1-1,which is in excess of: • The CCME Table 1 ISQG value of 0.0419 IAA • Pyrene Pyrene was detected at a concentration of 0.079 jig/g at sediment sample location SED 1-1,which is in excess of: • The CCME Table 1 ISQG value of 0.053 ug/g 5.4 Surface Water 5.4:1 OccuAR NCE& ; The majority of the SCH property is located on Lake Erie and Big Otter DESCRIPTIO V ' ` r.. Creek. : "USE :-° = - '.A The water lot is primarily used as a recreational and commercial fishing access point.The estimated distance to surface water users is . ; ' :° unknown. 3 SURF 0 Wig,Ei.rou,A40 WATERNo surface water quality information is known to be available for the NFO Citi r ON' .' • site. Surface water quality samples were not collected. 5.5 Groundwater 1 $ Oi*$RRfe°rION, PHY8[ .-; No wells are associated with the SCH property. Groundwater was not PAFMtetiFii. encountered in any of the shallow holes advanced on site. 5.5:E LOCAL USE r There is no indication that the groundwater supply has ever been developed or used on the site.The estimated distance to groundwater ,N , a' users is unknown. '4:3 Y:''GHOUNPWATEK Gu ' Nogroundwater samples were collected as part of this assessment. s .�Y P • 'VFORMATrON No groundwater quality information is known to be available for the T� ti site. 4092-10 18 March 2001 SIJ[ d. iaj&� Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 6.0 BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 6.1 Vegetation 6.1.1 P.Qt T:C/i,. r;AE A significant portion of the shoreline comprises structures associated with ZONE the SCH property. The littoral area was snow and ice covered during the `: site visit; however, based on a 1995 aerial photograph of the site, the " remainder of the shoreline is either partially grassed or covered in gravel and rocks. 6.1.2 WFILANDSAIAPISHES Mr. Dave Richards of the MNR was not aware of any significant wetlands on,or adjacent to,the subject property. 6.1.3 TEFInFsTPlr..r The ground cover was primarily snow covered during the site visit. However, based on a 1995 aerial photograph,terrestrial vegetation on the site consists of grasses and weeds. 6.1.4 PESTS ciu=.{-EREiiclDE:• • No indication of past or present pesticide use was uncovered during this USE • assessment. 6.2 Fish and Fish Habitat 6.2.1 COMMON SPECIES Based on information provided in the 1997 Gartner Lee Limited Report, • KNOWN IN VICINITY • .. the beach areas on either side of the harbour mouth, especially on the east side, contain a shallow sandy shoreline that is typical of spawning areas for smelt, spottail and emerald shiners, trout and perch in the :. ' .. Central Basin. 6.2,E ;HABITAT u-nt_izATION Mr. Dave Richards of the MNR has indicated that fish species utilize the subject property for feedingfforaging,spawning and as a migration route. 61.3 PROTECTED OR'Y_:`: , Mr. Dave Richards of the MNR is not aware of any protected or significant SIONIFIGAN-mare/3;i habitat associated with the subject property. 6.2.4 HE.cFtEATIONALA,% . . " ' The SCH property is used as an access point for recreational and COMMERC ALFull tNG -commercial fishing. 6.3 Wildlife ' aMM01-,P.044Mr. Dave Richards of the MNR has indicated that common waterfowl, yw nreptiles and amphibians utilize the subject property. 6x3.2;. l-ABITATt1TILIZATioM OF Based on information provided in the 1997 Gartner Lee Limited Report, �. r :PROPERTY ;•"'" waterfowl and other small mammals use the immediate vicinity for feeding and foraging. *IS PROTECTE'D•OF 1 No protected or significant habitat was identified. 4., . .. .SIGNlFLCANT'6ABI A.S TI _� Mr. Dave Richards of the MNR is not aware of the • HUNTING . property being utilized • for hunting purposes. 4092-10 19 March 2001 .C�Il�® Small Craft Harbours,Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 7.0 STRUCTURES & IMPROVEMENTS 7.1 Inventory of Structures Site structures consist of an entrance channel, basin, rock breakwater, concrete wharf,steel harbour wall (west and east), timber wharf,timber wharf ferry slip, • -,.,STRUCTURE LOCATION. ..: :WATER* DESCRIPTION/CONDITION • DATE .'. 1 Entrance Southeast In Steel sheet piles forms entrance 1904 channel portion of site at water. channel as part of the east pier and entrance of Big 7. west harbour wall. Otter Creek. 2 Basin Central portion In Surrounded by east and west shore 1904 of property, in water. walls (constructed of steel sheet pile), Big Otter Creek. the east pier(concrete superstructure on timber cribs),and the west pier (concrete face wall on timber pile). 3 Rock Southwest In Rock breakwater consists of rubble 1912 breakwater portion of site in water. mound and concrete. Lake Erie. 4 Concrete West side of Along Concrete wharf. 1904 wharf Big Otter Creek, shore. northwest portion of site. 5 Steel harbour Northwest Along West harbour wall consists of steel 1904 wall (west) portion of site, shore. sheet pile and concrete face (portions on west side of of steel sheet pile replaced in 1949 and Big Otter Creek. 1966,and concrete face repaired in 1951 and 1967). 6 Timber wharf Seasonal. In Stacked on east shore during site visit Unknown water. (January 2001). 7 Timber wharf Northeast Along Ferry slip constructed of timber as part 1904 ferry slip portion of site, shore. of the east pier. east side of Big Otter Creek. 8 Steel harbour Northeast Along East harbour wall consists of steel 1904 wall (east) portion of site, shore. sheet pile and concrete(portions of on east side of steel pile replaced in 1951 and 1960, Big Otter Creek. and concrete cap in 1960. 9 Timber North portion of Along Timber wharf. 1962 fisherman's site, east side shore. wharf of Big Otter Creek. 4092-10 20 MaCV}Lr® March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central & Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 STRUCTURE LOCATION. • WATERDESCRIPTION/CQNDIrI0N DATE;, 10 Rock shore East portion of Along 600 lineal feet of shoreline protected by 1978-79 protection. site, along east shore. rubble shore construction. shoreline. Distance to water is a consideration for future projects that may be subject to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act(CEAA) 7.2 Structures- Environmental Issues No significant environmental issues such as air emissions, lead,fuel storage, mercury(elemental), ODSs, PCBs, wastewater, potable water supply, hazardous materials/waste, or non-hazardous debris with respect to structures identified in Section 7.1 were identified. However, creosote may have been used as a wood preservative during wharf construction and repairs. This issue does not represent a significant environmental concern. 7.3 Easements/Site Services There are no services associated with the SCH property. Services such as gasoline,telephone and hydro are available in the immediate vicinity. 4092-f0 21 March 2001 �[�,�',�7]�'® Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 8.0 MATERIALS STORED, USED, OR DISCARDED 8.1 Aboveground Storage Tanks A review of existing information and observations made while on site suggest no aboveground storage tanks are, or ever were, located on the subject property. 8.2 Underground Storage Tanks A review of existing information and observations made while on site suggest no underground storage tanks are, or ever were, located on the subject property. In addition, the Technical Standards and Safety Authority(TSSA) Corporate Services Division was contacted to search their files for records of underground storage tank licenses or registrations on the subject property and no records were found (Appendix F). 8.3 Hazardous Materials/Waste No hazardous materials or waste was observed during the site visit however, observations were limited due to significant snow cover. 8.4 Non-Hazardous Materials/Waste No non-hazardous debris was observed on site during the site visit, however, observations were limited due to significant snow cover. 8.5 Placement of Fill, Dredged Materials The Dredge Monitoring Study completed by Aquafor Beech in 1996 found that Big Otter Creek transports about 410 tonnes of sediment daily. Adding to this is the littoral drift of Lake Erie,which also contributes heavily to sedimentation in the Outer Harbour area. The harbour has required dredging on a yearly basis since the mid 1970s as ongoing maintenance to remain navigable for recreational powerboats and commercial fishing vessels.The responsibility for dredging of the harbour has been with the municipality. In the past,the harbour was dredged as deep as 24 feet to suit commercial shipping but is now kept navigable for shallow draft vessels. To date, disposal of the dredge material has been on lands on the west harbour side. In 1999 and 2000 the dredged material was disposed of on lands owned by 345990 Ontario Limited (west shore near Pitt Street). A SCH summary provided to the municipality in 1998, indicated that the Big Otter Creed sediment chromium levels moderately exceeded Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (LELs) but these levels were not a result of current use or activities. Contamination in the creek is common knowledge and likely resulted from previous uses of adjacent properties and activities upstream. 4092-10 22 ��►Jl 7�► �I,elifiro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 In 2000, Talisman Energy side-cast some 9,200 m3 of material on the SCH property. The material was analyzed and was found to meet the 1998 MOE Guideline for residentiaVparkiand and industriaVcommercial uses in a non-potable groundwater condition. Fill materials for the construction of harbour improvements, such as rubble for breakwaters, was added to the property in the past. No other fill materials were identified on the property, however, observations were limited due to significant snow cover. 4092-10 23 Mardi 2001 LsU,C • �H]C°® Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario-Site No.4766 9.0 NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (NCS) SCORE FOR CONTAMINATED SITES The CCME National Classification System(NCS) for Contaminated Sites(March 1992) outlines a method for the evaluation of contaminated sites according to their current or potential adverse impact on human health and the environment. The NCS has not been designed specifically for aquatic contaminated sites, and therefore was not used for classifying the waterlot portion of the property. Since no soil contamination in excess of the MOE and CCME guideline limits was reported for the subject site, a NCS score has not been evaluated. 10.0 INDICATIVE ESTIMATE OF LIABILITY OR CONTINGENT LIABILITY- In accordance with the requirements of the Treasury Board, an indicative estimate of liability or contingent liability pertains to the costs and liabilities related to the management and restoration of environmentally contaminated sites when contamination occurs if the government is obliged, or is likely to be obliged to incur such costs:for reasons of public health and safety;to be in compliance with an act or regulation issued by a government; or due to contractual arrangements. Since a NCS score cannot be evaluated for the sediment contamination, and no soil contamination in excess of the MOE and CCME guideline limits was reported for the subject site, an indicative estimate of liability or contingent liability has not been evaluated. 11.0 REAL PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINATED SITES (RPISCS) MODULE Based on the results of the Enhanced Phase 1 ESA, MacViro has input the data into the RPISCS module and has provided copies of the module screens from all relevant sections of the module in Appendix G. 4092-10 24 MacViro i ro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 12.0 SUMMARY An Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment has been completed at the Port Burwell Federal Harbour, located on the north shore of Lake Erie in the Township of Bayham, Ontario. The site is comprised of approximately 82 ha (land and water) at the mouth of Big Otter Creek. The harbour is primarily a series of marginal wharves and piers directing Big Otter Creek into Lake Erie. The harbour is subject to extensive siltation, from both littoral action (sand from Lake Erie)and river process (silt from Big Otter Creek). A small wharf was originally constructed in 1840, and underwent major improvements in the early 1900s. The federal property is"fee simple"which means that there is no reversionary interest. Talisman Energy Inc. operatesa pipeline, welding and pulling operation as part of its natural gas ventures on Lake Erie. It draws pipe across lands it subleases from the Township (who lease it from 345990 Ontario Limited)through the Talisman and MNR properties and into Lake Erie. Talisman also has two tugs for ferrying workers to an offshore platform and as dive vessels. Some commercial fishing operations remain in the area and consist of berthing of commercial fishing vessels and a small fish processing operation. The majority of the commercial fishing activities occur on lands leased by the Township from 345990 Ontario Limited. Two resident commercial fishermen use the harbour and up to 10 transient commercial fishing vessels may utilize the property during the fishing season which extends from April to November. The property is used as a boat access point;therefore,fishing operations do not occur on the federal property. Information from the MOE and the Municipality of Bayham had not been received at the date of submission of this report. The responses will be forwarded upon receipt. A site reconnaissance was performed by MacViro on January 17, 2001. Observations made during the site reconnaissance, historical records review and analytical testing of building material and soil samples revealed minor concerns as a result of this assessment, and are listed below in order of priority. The following potential concern was identified during this enhanced Phase I ESA: Sediment Analysis of six sediment samples revealed that concentrations of PAHs exceeded the "Interim Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines" (ISQGs), as outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, 1999(CEQG). Concentrations of Acenaphthene, phenanthrene, and pyrene concentrations exceeded the ISQGs at one location. Concentrations of metals, nutrients and pesticides in sediment samples collected at the site were found to exceed sediment "Lowest Effect Level" (LEL) values as set out in the MOE Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment in Ontario, August 1993(PSQG). TOC concentrations at four locations, pp-DDE at two locations and copper, manganese,TKN and phosphorous at one location exceeded the LEL. The total ammonia concentration at one location exceeded the Open Water Disposal Criteria set in the PSQG. 4092-10 25 JacVir® March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario-Site No.4766 13.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the Phase I investigation indicate areas on the subject property where concentrations of metals, nutrients, pesticides and PAHs in sediment exceed the LELs in the PSQGs and/or the ISQGs in CEQGs. This may have potential implications with respect to future activities involving waterlot sediments, such as dredging. The sediment evaluation procedure outlined in the PSQGs indicates that sediment concentrations that exceed LELs should be compared with local background levels for that parameter. Therefore, it is recommended that background sediment samples be analyzed and the results compared to the sediment on the SCH property. In addition, consideration should be given to delineating the extent of the sediment impacts on and off the subject property. It should be noted that groundwater, surface water, and air were not sampled during the Phase I ESA. MacViro Consultants Inc. —;\.); Prepared by:Steve A. Gonsalves, C.E.T. Reviewed by: Michael J. Lon and, P.Eng., CEA Environmental Specialist Project ana er • 4092-10 26 MacViro March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX A: Site Location Plan 4092-10 March 2001 iR V '1 . i r i r t r r 4p, N L.--- hEv .\4) ._ • : -7 t Y St011ey1 CM )::.- . --"‘. • 403 •- _� • 7� • fir------71.. . • f. — — — — _.._. �_ Poet govern. Nanticoke i 1 Poet Bruce - • �_� Port Rowan Port Burwell __ , Oh Lake Erie ONTA�O _ � — �'� ---";kl; ro-itio _____. ........„ _ 1 .......„ - .micim ._,__ : _____ - . _:.. .,,, . 1 . 1 1 • . --- :-..),7 1 • . . REFERENCE; �f.f� MAP PREPARED FOR SMALL CRAFT HARBOURS BRANCH BY THE CANADIAN HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE, CENTRAL AND ARCTIC REGION, DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS,BURLINGTON,ONTARIO, 1988 DATE: FEBRUARY 2001 - SITE LOCATION PLAN MacViro SCALE: N.T.S. Designing Environmental&EnergySoluhons Phase I Environmental Site Assessment FILE No.: 4092 AFFND: MJL SMALL CRAFT HARBOURS FIG.No.: REV i I. i i i i II i i i i i i II Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX B: Site Plan 4092-10 �/� March 2001 Mac 1!��y im 17' .r r r r r i II r. NOTE- 8.11 grooah .,C+Y illk PART 3: PLAN 111/-6760 IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS SET OUT IN UNREGISTERED DOCUMENT DATED: NOVEMBER 26711. 1948(FILE NO. 407-1) „s=PAO itra PART 4: PLAN 11R-6760 IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS SET OUT IN UNREGISTERED DOCUMENT DATED: MAY 30TH, 1939(TUE NO.407-1U) SiNAl curt NAI®plif5 PART 5: PLAN 11R-6760 IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS SET OUT IN UNREGISTERED MORAL AND ARCM REGION DOCUMENT DATED: APRE.5114. 1050(FILE NO.407-1) ,1. C, PART 6, 12 AND 13: PLAN 11R-990 SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AS SET OUT IN ,INSTRUMENT NO.100784(NOT SFR) 1 , j .1 PART 9: PLAN 11R-990 AND PART 2: PLAN 11R-6467 SUBJECT TO A RIGHT-OF-WAY �/ AS SET IN INSTRUMENT NO.100784(NOT SHO1NH). d 1 to /'J T ! V •;, .,co 0 / ` t f r-•• - _ - �- • - •' •I MO OR91 NNW IW UM ISI MI6 OF IP _OF ' 11 10 OMR OM 100 JOE OE Mff `fy, .. Mk 110'8110 OF bp1�Mhl COM VF d �r V O q R*1114 11111._._,A07 • II Ass III R -:T 7 CA O01BI10 tlRlll!Ilk 1101 }r . ..�/ ...ll•..}.j 1 111' F./ST 511011L1Mi I. �.,! FOQ=EL f' ` ` 101 ' y� fiLli 43.1%j [ ç _SOIL 1-1 l • a 110111/0011 ST. �'•' �.(�CFlR I !IFIL0 T111tl�RST �a I miziaRA11 ' pL '-:JSP YIOIiDMR1 64.�o - n R+ '.ry .�. , r.:.i I::_P.aJ �t �wnwiwwFrra� l♦ _. = "'` [i)SED.1-•1 q - • Ie..:%) 1 LAND A N/A +\N +r i -� SEDT 1-2 aowa a1Fn WAIIIRAT Mak N/A },� a 11N.aM 01).7-�,•11 ,,s, - s._ /`�'` %11 ,� mg so I TOTAL AREA'. 122.134hR "�� a L wrwL� rmlou Rm1 1 ,0 a *rk;r.., pd. 00. +ssr ' `a *. . 18/10/94 — J.D.C. ••,4,...4114114 SW y' �•�0a•..m= ..1- ' r�►. 21/10/97 - N.F.G. �� �EROWo -1..fi: --' I. . .� •••=.•••..,IM.—L....3 IMI ,.•1n1 :, nV] � . 1c40O0 D ssATTIA1 Ti0T. ION S TRAY sT. 1f , w — / I 11 11 /J/ Jac(s '•S'�'=.1p COMPILED PROPERTY PLAN 5.Y./.1.9.C. ILK Q 20/42/91 06/06/97 `) LOCATION OF SEDIMENT SNAPLES MANED BY i MACVSRO ON 1/17/01 (THIS NOTE AWED 17Y •' UNG-I R0 CONSULTANTS IiC.ON FEB.19.2001) .. • Tog RE 1109 scE 9 LOCATION of SOIL SAMPLE OBTAINED BY MM(YIRD '--1 FRO" t9 'w PORT BURWELL ON 1/17/01 (IRIS NOTE ADDED BY(ACV= - E SMiff KR 0.11.06011 ONTARIO CONSULTANTS INC.ON WARM 27.2001) 1 ,.rte 4766-PTC 4766 It r I 11 � II I i 1 f I I f F E E Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX C: Site Photographs 4092-10 March 2001 M cVi o it 1 1 r 1 Ii at It • aa View of Big Otter Creek Looking South II Ft I View of Big Otter Creek Looking North Iii '1 Ii ii 1 I ii I 1 i JP —le; f. - 42 r_-, K _ + - _...,, ___ View of Site Looking South from Robinson Street I - i1 - _ f . _._ „rr. t ^s 4 - tea. „,...14. F t . IIP x st !r View of Beach Property Looking South II II, i It f If II 1- - + - - two View of Sediment Sample SED 1-2 Location East of Tallisman Energy ASTS • 1, - .• ••• 77"-- -- „;,--• - - ; — • • _ , _ _ I gr." 171s • View of Sediment Sample SED 1-1 Location East of Sewage Treatment Plant Property 1 1 11 ii I II 1 Ii 1 I I I � Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX D. Aerial Photographs 4092-10 March 2001 c i r 1 iII 1 1 l 1 1 r i i J I I "Mg. '.. . _ _# if I�I ffi 4 "7"'r — ,.. dr • ill! A? - , .k. :X 1..i , 3 ori 4 'i - d'- ';.. ` ` i ,i Aiiiii • Site { . csIfs-`, DATE: MARCH 2001 SCALE: N.T.S. 1955 AERIAL [aC v io PHOTOGRAPH Designing Environmental4rEnc►JPSolutions FILE No.: 4092 PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO FIG No.: IREV APP'VD: MJL f f t ti ti '` .•..--,1n` itf�'. .,�. - ' ice_ ,' 1"� •�' 111. 0 ./1 f'..; ,- , " • , .. 1 11 l ' ! .. . • . , , _ ' ' 41°1 .1. 1. r ' �- ._ . +t� ° l q ! i moi L 9 �• A 3 �.. n' . file • • Jf ray 4, • -.4._.;. _ ., - ay ,• ' ' 7 41 1 eeP 1 �� 4 1. • j _ r 'AL , I 1 F - 78 -4245 284w DAZE: MARCH 2001 SCALE: N.T.S. 1.978 AERIAL MV I:WA U'O PHOTOGRAPH DesigningEnvinstunental+r Energy Solutions FILE No.: 4092 PORT BURWELL, ONTARIO FIG No.: 2 REV APPVD: Mil, f I I ; - y !,r - - I .441‘ r^w: r -; "Lae r --' ,".- _ - r _.11'.01-_,m ` . 1- RTBtLL NNE 1995 4766 l I Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX E: Supporting Information E-1:Results of Analyses for Metals,Nutrients and Additional Parameters in Sediment 4092-10 March 2001 Mac`[ i o i� I I I 1 I I I II I , 111 I PH Table E-1 Sediment Analysis Results for Metals,Nutients and Additional Parameters Port Burwell CCME 1999 CEQ Provincial Sediment ' Parameter Guidelines' Quality Guidelines2 Units SED1-1 SED1-1 SED1-2 SED1-3 Interim Open Water Freshwater Lowest Disposal Sediment Quality Effect Guideline (Replicate) 'Date Sampled> Guidelines Level Criteria 1/17/01 1/17/01 1/17/01 1/17/01 Metals Arsenic 5.9 6 - µg/g 0.9 0.9 2.2 0.9 Cadmium 0.6 0.6 µg/g <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3 Chromium (total) 37.3 26 - µg/g 5 5 11 7• Copper 35.7 16 - µg/g 5 5 19 8 Iron - 2 - % 0.7 0.7 1.4 0.9 Lead 35 31 - µg/g 5 7 11 7 Manganese - 460 - pg/g 245 241 484 263 Mercury 0.17 0.2 µg/g <0.01 <0.01 0.03 0.01 Nickel - 16 µg/g 5 5 10 6 Zinc 123 120 - µg/g 21 21 53 28 Nutrients TOC - 1 - % 1 1 2.5 1.1 TKN - 550 - µg/g 224 224 1170 392 Phosphorus 600 - µg/g 471 479 823 588 Additional Parameters Oil&Grease - - 0.15 % <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.01 Total Cyanide - 0.1 µg/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Total Ammonia 100 nig <20 <20 126 28 Cobalt - 50 µg/g • <2 2 5 3 Silver - 0.5 µg/g . <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 NOTES: ' Criteria are from Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life, 1999(Table 1). 2 Criteria are from Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario,August, 1993. Samples exceeding Lowest Effect Level are bold. Samples exceeding Open Water Disposal Guideline Criteria are bold and italicized. Project No.4092 MacViY o March 2001 Table E-1 Sediment Analysis Results for Metals,Nutients and Additional Parameters Port Burwell CCME 1999 CEQ Provincial Sediment Parameter Guidelines' Quality Guidelines2 Units SED1-4 SED1-4X SED1.5 SED1-6 Interim Open Water Freshwater Lowest Disposal Sediment Quality Effect Guideline (Duplicate) Date Sampled> Guidelines Level Criteria 1/17/01 1/17/2001 1/17/01 1/17/01 Metals Arsenic 5.9 6 µg/g 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.0 Cadmium 0.6 0.6 - µgig <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 Chromium(total) 37.3 26 lAgig 4 4 5 •7 Copper 35.7 16 µg/g 1 1 4 8 Iron - 2 - % 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.9 Lead 35 31 Rig 6 <5 <5 <5 Manganese - 460 - µg/g 127 116 149 299 Mercury 0.17 0.2 - µg/g <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Nickel - 16 - µg/g <2 <2 3 6 Zinc 123 120 - _ p.g/g 11 10 16 30 Nutrients TOC - 1 % 0.3 0.6 0.5 1.3 TKN 550 µg/g 60 <60 <60 392 Phosphorus - 600 _ µg/g 446 378 426 590 Additional Parameters Oil&Grease - - 0.15 % <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Total Cyanide - 0.1 µg/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Total Ammonia 100 .tg/g <20 <20 <20 70 Cobalt - 50 µgig <2 <2 <2 3 Silver - - 0.5 µg/g . <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 NOTES: 1 Criteria are from Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life, 1999(Table 1). 2 Criteria are from Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario,August, 1993. Samples exceeding Lowest Effect Level are bold. Samples exceeding Open Water Disposal Guideline Criteria are bold and italicized. Project No.4092 1 tiacViCJI March 2001 Small Craft Harbours, Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX E (CONTI *: Supporting Information E-2: Results of Analyses for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediment 4092-10 March 2001 1 /tae Y ,® II I I I I I I I I II I Table E-2 Sediment Analysis Results for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Port Burwell Parameter CCME 1999 CEQ Provincial Sediment Guidelines[ Quality Guidelines SED SED SED SED SED Interim Freshwater Lowest Bulk EQL 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-4X Sediment Quality Effect Level Sediment Value 4 Date Sampled> Guidelines 1/17/2001 1/17/2001 1/17/2001 1/17/2001 1/17/2001 .._.. 1-Methylnaphthalene • - - - 0.010' nd nd nd nd nd 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.0202 - 0.010 nd nd nd nd nd Acenaphthene 0.0067I - - 0.005 0.007 nd nd nd nd Acenaphthylene 0.00587 - 0.005 nd nd nd nd nd Anthracene 0.0469'' 0.220 0.010 0.018 nd nd nd nd Benzo(a)anthracene 0.03I7 0.320 0.010 0.022 nd nd nd nd Benzo(a)pyrene 0.0319 0.370 - 0.010 0.024 nd nd nd nd Benzo(b)fluoranthene r - 0.010 0.035 0.018 nd nd nd Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.170 0.010 0.015 nd nd nd nd Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.240 0.010 0.013 nd nd nd nd Chrysene 0.0571 0.340 0.010 0.022 0.010 nd nd nd Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.00622 0.060 0.005 nd nd nd nd nd Fluoranthene 0.111 0.750 0.010 0.091 0.026 0.013 nd nd Fluorene 0.0212 0.190 0.010 0.010 nd nd nd nd Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.200 0.010 0.019 0.011 nd nd nd Naphthalene 0.0346 - 0.010 nd nd nd nd nd Phenanthrene 0.0419 0.560 - 0.010 0.076 0.012 nd nd nd Pyrene 0.053 0.490 -. 0.010 0.079 0.023 0.011 nd nd Total PAHs3 - 4 - 0.05 0.431 0.100 0.024 nd nd Total Organic Carbon(%) - - - 0.05 1.000 2.48 1.12 0.32 0.64 NOTES; All results are in pg/g unless otherwise stated. nd=Not detected above Estimated Quantitation Limit. EQL=Estimated Quantitation Limit. Samples exceeding CCME are bold. 1 Criteria are from Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life,1999(Table 1). Criteria are from Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario,August,1993. 7 Total PAHs is a sum of 16 PAH compounds:Acenaphthene,Acenaphthylene,Anthracene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Benzo(b)lluoranthene,Benzo(a)anthracene,Benzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(ghi)perylene,Chrysene,Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene,Fluoranthene, Fluorene,Indeno(t,2,3-cd)pyrene,Naphthalene,Phenanthrene and Pyrene. 4 The average bulk sediment values are shown. Project No.4092 MacV1r0 March 2001 i I li I I II I I I 1 1 1 I I I 'II _I I Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX E (CONT'D): Supporting Information E-3:Results of Analyses for PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides in Sediment • • 4092-10 March 2001 Mac pyo I, 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 f 1 Table E-3 Sediment Analysis Results for PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides Port Burwell Parameter CCME 1999 CEQ Provincial Sediment Guidelines' Quality Guidelines2 SED SED SED SED Interim Freshwater Lowest Bulk EQL 1-1 1-1 1-2 1-3 Sediment Quality Effect Level Sediment Value 3 (Rep) Date Sampled> Guidelines 1/17/01 1/17/01 , 1/17/01 1/17/01 Aldrin - 0.002 - 0.002 nd nd nd nd BHC - 0.003 - 0.002 nd nd nd nd cc-BHC - 0.006 0.002 nd nd nd nd I3-BHC 0.0050.002 nd nd nd nd y-BHC 0.003 0.002 nd nd nd nd Chlordane 0.0045 0.007 0.002 nd nd nd nd op+pp-DDT 0.00119 0.008 0.004 nd nd nd nd pp-DDD 0.008 0.004 nd nd nd nd pp-DDE 0.005 - 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.014 0.007 Dieldrin 0.00285 0.002 0.002 nd nd nd nd Endrin 0.00267 0.003 0.004 nd nd nd nd HCB - 0.020 0.002 nd nd nd nd Heptachlor 0.002 nd nd nd nd H Epoxide 0.006 0.005 0.040 nd nd nd nd Mirex - 0.007 0.004 nd nd nd nd PCB(total) 0.0341 •-0.070 - 0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 Total Organic Carbon(%) - - - 1 1 2.48 1.12 NoTESt All results are inµg/g unless otherwise stated. Samples exceeding Lowest Effect Level are bold nd=Not detected above Estimated Quantitation Limit. EQL=Estimated Quantitation Limit. Criteria are from Canadian'Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life,1999(Table 1). 'Criteria are from Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario,August,1993. 'The average bulk sediment values are shown. Project No.4092 I[acVij1.o March 2001 l' F f I l 1' I 1i Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No. 4766 APPENDIX E (CONT'D): Supporting Information E-4: Results of Analyses for MOE Inorganic Parameters in Soil 4092-10 Mardi 2001 MacViiro 1 1 � A 1 1 1 f 1 1 II Y i1 1 r • Table E-4 Surface Soil Analysis Results,Metals Port Burwell CCME MOE MOE Parameter 1999 CEQ 1998 Guideline 1998 Guideline LOQ Units SOIL1-1 SOILI-1 Guidelines Table B Table F (Replicate) Date Sampled> Residential/Parkland' Residential/Parkland2 Background' 1/17/01 1/17/01 Antimony - 13 1 0.2 peg <0.2 <0.2 Arsenic 12 25 17 5 µg/g 0.7 0.7 Barium 500 1000 210 5 µg/g 6 6 Beryllium - 1.2 1.2 0.2 µg/g <0.2 <0.2 Cadmium 10 12 1 0.3 µg/g <0.3 <0.3 Chromium 64 1000 71 1 µg/g 3 4 Chromium Hexavalent 0.4 10 2.5 3 µg/g <1 <1 Cobalt - 50 21 2 peg <2 <2 Copper 63 300 85 1 µg/g 1 2 Lead 140 200 120 5 µg/g <5 <5 Mercury 6.6 10 0.23 0.01 µg/g <0.01 <0.01 Molybdenum40 2.5 3 pg/g <3 <3 Nickel 50 200 43 2 µg/g 3 3 Selenium10 1.9 0.2 µg/g <0.2 <0.2 Silver - 25 0.42 0.8 µg/g <0.8 <0.8 Vanadium 130 250 91 1 µg/g 9 10 Zinc 200 800 160 5 µg/g 12 12 Notes: LOQ=Limit of Quantitation=lowest level of the parameter that can be quantified with confidence. 1 Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment(CCME)"Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines" 1999. Chapter 7: Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health(Residential/Parkland Land Use). Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy(MOE)"Guideline For Use At Contaminated Sites In Ontario"September 1998. Table B: Surface Soil Criteria for Residential/Parkland Land Use for a Non-Potable Groundwater (fine-medium textured soils) 3 Ontario Ministry of Environment(MOE)"Guideline For Use At Contaminated Sites In Ontario"September 1998. Table F:Ontario Typical Range Soil Concentrations(Background). Project No.: 4092 Mac'Tiro February 2001 I c r r I Ig I f l Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX E (CONT'D): Supporting Information E-5:Laboratory Certificate of Analysis 4092-10 March 2001 Mach[ iro I r M t a * .___ .1 t illi. ANALYTICAL SERVICES 16-Feb-2001 MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Page: 1 Markham, ON Copy: 1 of 2 L3R 6H3 Attn: Steve Gonsalves Received: 12--Feb-2001 14:55 Project: 4092 PO #: Job: 2151180 Status: Final SOIL 1-1 Blank Standard Standard Repeat (found) (expected) SOIL 1-1 Parameter soil Antimony SW 7041 ug/g <0 .2 <0 .2 0 . 6 0 .5 <0 .2 Arsenic SW 7061 ug/g 0.7 <0.2 19 . 6 20 .4 0 .7 Barium SW 6010 mod. ug/g 6 <5 168 157 6 Beryllium SW 6010 mod. ug/g <0 .2 <0 .2 0 .7 0 .6 <0 .2 Cadmium SW 6010 mod. ug/g <0 .3 <0 .3 0 . 8 0 .7 <0 .3 Chromium SW 6010 mod. ug/g 3.... <1 39 47 4 Chromium (6+) SW 7196 ug/g <1 <1 3 3 <1 Cobalt SW 6010 mod. ug/g <2 <2 26 27 <2 Copper SW 6010 mod. ug/g 1 <1 31 34 2 Lead SW 6010 mod. ug/g <5 <5 21 21 <5 Mercury SW 7470 ug/g <0 . 01 <0 . 01 0 .28 0..29 <0 . 01 Molybdenum SW 6010 mod. ug/g <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 Nickel SW 6010 mod. ug/g 3 <2 43 43 3 Selenium SW 7741 ug/g <0.2 <0 .2 0 . 6 0.5 <0 .2 Silver SW 6010 mod. ug/g <0 . 8 <0 . 8 3 . 0 2 . 6 <0 . 8 Vanadium SW 6010 mod. ug/g 9 <1 48 48 10 Zinc SW 6010 mod. ug/g 12 <5 126 128 12 Free Cyanide SM 4500I ug/g <0 .02 <0 .02 0.06 0 .05 <0 .02 5735 ;.I ADui ROAI}...\lI i,,u i,1.O\I.\IIu.(;.\\\i L.i7 11c) 'I'i:i:4 SI5)89(143S(6 PA:(905)890-8=r5-55'5 \ 'J himmi=1* ANALYTICAL SERVICES 16-Feb-2001 MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Page: 2 Markham, ON Copy: 1 of 2 L3R 6H3 Attn: Steve Gonsalves Received: 12-Feb-2001 14 : 55 Project: 4092 PO #: Job: 2151180 Status: Final All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with normal professional standards using accepted testing methodologies and QA/QC procedures . Philip Analytical is limited in liability to the actual cost of the pertinent analyses done unless otherwise agreed upon by contractual arrangement. Your samples will be retained by PASC for a period of 30 days following reporting or as per specific contractual arrangements. Job approve by: / Signed: At ' / R p Siebert, B.Sc. Project Manager 5'35 Mt Alum 111.,E-- 1 1.1.c 1.rueu,.(:1\1I.% Iii°) 1'rI:(‘)i h)8‘)(18S(.6 (:�\:(90i)59{1-}55 5 0 m*Miirm`m MI PHILIP SERVICES 30-Jan-2001 MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Page: 2 Markham, ON Copy: 1 of 1 L3R 6H3 Attn: Steve Gonsalves Received: 19-Jan-2001 16 : 53 Project: 4092 PO .#: Job: 2150521 Status : Final Sediment Samples TKN TOC NH3-N Total CN- Oil & Grs. As Hg Cd Titr. LECO Titr. SM 4500E SM 5520E HGAAS CVAAS ICAP Sample Id ppm % _ ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm SED1-1 224 1. 00 <20 <0.05 <100 0 .9 <0 . 01 <0.3 SED1-2 1170 2 .48 126 <0 .05 100 2 .2 0 . 03 0 .3 SED1-3 392 1.12 28 <0. 05 100 0.9 0 .01 <0.3 SED1-4 60 0 .32 <20 <0.05 <100 0 .3 <0 . 01 <0.3 SED1-4X <60 0 . 64 <20 <0 . 05 <100 0 .2 <0 . 01 <0 . 3 SED1-5 <60 0 .52 <20 <0 . 05 <100 0 .4 <0 . 01 <0 .3 SED1-6 392 1 .28 70 <0.05 <100 1. 0 <0 . 01 <0.3 Blank <60 <0 .05 <20 <0 . 05 <100 <0.2 <0 . 01 <0.3 QC Standard (found) 1510 0 . 80 182 0 .86 1050 19 . 6 0 .26 0.8 QC Standard (expected) 1500 0 . 80 181 1 . 00 1280 20. 4 0 . 29 0 .7 Repeat SED1-1 224 1.00 <20 <0 . 05 <100 0 . 9 <0 . 01 <0.3 1,,„ i.,\\tI11U \I 'II\I U 5-35\IcActin' IZoad.]1i.ti^,i>saug:I.tInt:irin.(:,Inatla I.ii. I\'1 Id (thri)ti°7[6444.Ifi I:I\ I'Si1‘;l89A1-8;'i \\,ii:,: 1.80(1-263.90 in ttxctt'.hhiiih:trl,ilttia'.LI.L. IU L 1 f PHILIP SERVICES , 30-Jan-2001 MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Page: 3 Markham, ON Copy: 1 of 1 L3R 6H3 Attn: Steve Gonsalves Received: 19-Jan-2001 16:53 Project: 4092 PO ,#: Job: 2150521 Status: Final Sediment Samples Cr Co Cu Fe Pb Mn Ni Ag ICAP ICAP ICAP ICAP ICAP ICAP ICAP ICAP Sample Id ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm SED1-1 5 <2 5 7360 5 245 5 <0 .3 SED1-2 11 5 19 13900 11 484 10 <0 .3 SED1-3 7 3 8 8740 7 263 6 <0.3 SED1-4 4 <2 1 6210 6 127 <2 <0.3 SED1-4X 4 <2 1 4770 <5 116 <2 <0 .3 SED1-5 5 <2 4 6890 <5 149 3 <0.3 . SED1-6 7 3 8 8780 <5 299 6 <0.3 7 Blank <1 <2 <1 <50 <5 <1 <2 <0 .3 QC Standard (found) 39 26 31 30700 21 1170 43 3 . 0 QC Standard (expected) 46 27 34 30000 21 1190 43 2 . 6 Repeat SED1-1 5 2 5 7320 7 241 5 <0 .3 Ilium:%\U iv L 'IiR%IC I's i—ii 1k.Ulim RUIid \]ississauga.Ontario.Call:Ill:I I:I% 1\U li.1:1905) .)fl-Nifih Ias;I`)(Ii)'U4I 5`5 %Ovals: 1-+•iIR1-26i-911 E1) NI.%V C' JIiiIiI)Ill Lh 1K it C'ssltl-_ •s L— ' l •�! PHILIP SERVICES 30-Jan-2001 MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Page: 4 Markham, ON Copy: 1 of 1 L3R 6H3 Attn: Steve Gonsalves Received: 19-Jan-2001 16 :53 Project: 4092 PO #: Job: 2150521 Status: Final Sediment Samples Zn P ICAP ICAP Sample Id ppm ppm • SED1-1 21 471 SED1-2 53 823 SED1-3 - 28 588 SED1-4 11 446 SED1-4X 10 378 SED1-5 16 426 SED1-6 30 590 Blank <5 <20 QC Standard (found) 126 881 QC Standard (expected) 128 810 Repeat SED1-1 21 479 SIR114:1.' 5-35 \ICAtlanl Road.Mississauga.Ontario.(:an;ula I.17. IN,/ TO-t9115)1-19(1.1.45()(1 l:ax:19l)5)}i)I)-S S \\ii;: 1.8E10-203.W)til \\\c\\.hhilipanalytiraI CA l•-• I-IT PHILIP SERVICES 30-Jan-2001 MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Page: 5 Markham, ON Copy: 1 of 1 L3R 6H3 Attn: Steve Gonsalves Received: 19-Jan-2001 16:53 Project: 4092 PO #: Job: 2150521 Status: Final All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with normal professional standards using accepted testing methodologies and QA/QC procedures. Philip Analytical is limited in liability to the actual cost of the pertinent analyses done unless otherwise agreed upon by contractual arrangement. Your samples will be retained by PASC for a period of 30 days following reporting or as per specific contractual arrangements. Job approved b : Signed: /let. - ``- ph Siebert, B.Sc. Project Manager i'ii\1c.(lam Road.\ii...i.,attga.Ontario.(;inti Ia 1.I% !N') 'I I:(')(li)Ii9I)-HS6( Fax:(90i)H9t1-hi—i Want: I44i)11-!63-91110 wwtc.phililrtilviic,iI.cmI 4 MI Client : MacViro Consultants Inc. Date:January 29, 2001 90 Allstate Pkwy., Suite 600 Markham, ON. L3R 6H3 Contact : Steve Gonsalves Client project# :4092 PASC job# : 2150521 Matrix Soil Certificate of Analysis Analysis Performed: EPA 608 Priority Pollutant Pesticides/PCB Methodology: Determination of EPA 608 pesticides by solvent extraction, dry over Na2SO4, Florisil cleanup, and analysis with dual capillary GC/ECD, U.S. EPA Method 8081/608 Instrumentation: Varian 3400 with autosampler and STAR Workstation Sample Description: Soil Results: Refer to Report of Analysis attached. All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with normal professional standards using accepted testing methodologies and QA/QC procedures. Philip Analytical is limited in liability to the actual cost of the pertinent analyses done unless otherwise agreed upon by contractual arrangement. Your samples will be retained by PASC for a period of 30 days following reporting or as per specific contractual arrangements. w Certified By Medhat Riskallah, Ph.D., C.Chem. Manager, Gas Chromatography Section Piiiu.Ir'AN11vIi('\I.SpitIi.Iti i-35:McAdam I(44a[1.:\li+.i.s;ui :L()04ariu,( In;I4LI i.i% I;'') Tel:(909)H911-8900 I as:(94151 8916H9—S \\ai+: I 44110-203-91)40 v w.hhitihanatpticaI.rum Client : MacViro Consultants Inc. Date: January 29, 2001 90 Allstate Pkwy., Suite 600 Markham, ON. L3R 61-13 Contact : Steve Gonsalves Client project# : 4092 PASC job# : 2150521 Matrix Soil Report of Analysis Compound L.O.Q Reagent Spiked SED SED SED SED ug/g Blank Reagent 1-1 1-1 1-2 1-3 • Blank Repeat 1 Aldrin 0.002 ND 76% ND ND ND ND 2 Alpha-BHC 0.002 ND 72% ND ND ND ND 3 Beta-BHC 0.002 ND 80% ND ND ND ND 4 Delta-BHC 0.002 ND 67% ND ND ND ND 5 Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.002 ND 68% ND ND ND ND 6 Alpha Chlordane 0.002 ND 84% ND ND ND ND 7 Gamma-Chlordane 0.002 ND 82% ND ND ND ND 8 4,4'-DDD 0.004 ND 97% ND ND ND ND 9 4,4'-DDE 0.002 ND 77% 0.003 0.003 0.014 0.007 10 4,4'-DDT 0.004 ND 84% ND ND ND ND 11 2,4'-DDT 0.004 ND 84% ND ND ND ND 12 Dieldrin 0.002 ND 78% ND ' ND ND ND 13 Endosulfan I 0.004 ND 86% ND ND ND ND 14 Endosulfan II 0.004 ND 35% ND ND ND ND ; 15 Endosulfan Sulphate 0.004 ND 71% ND ND ND ND 16 Endrin 0.004 ,ND 71% ND ND ND ND 17 Endrin Aldehyde 0.010 ND 114% ND ND ND ND 18 Heptachlor 0.002 ND 79% ND ND ND ND 19 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.002 ND 79% ND ND ND ND 20 Methoxychlor 0.040 ND 77% ND ND ND ND 21 Mirex 0.004 ND 74% ND ND ND ND 23 Total PCB'S 0.05 ND 108% ND ND ND ND 22 Endrin Ketone 0.004 ND 85% ND ND ND ND 24 Toxaphene 0.3 ND --- ND ND ND ND 25 Tetrachloro-m-Xylene %Recovery 86% 88% 89% 87% 76% 83% (surrogate standard) L.O.Q.=Limit of Quantitation ND = Not Detected ug/g =micrograms per gram I'i1II.IP AN 11.Y r1'..11-SIAM( 5'35 McAdam I(uacl.N1 imissa tiga.(/nlarin.(:anacla I.)% I N') -Id:(')115)890-H(. I ati.190i1 Iiyli-MS—S Wats: I,8(10-26,.')11 ID 1+'ti+'1 ithilipana119ical.con1 F ' fu Page 1 of 4 il client: MacViro Consultants Inc. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAH's) Project Reference:4092 Vork Order Number:2150521B Units: Micrograms/gram(pglg)dry weight Date: 29-Jan-01 .Aatrix:Soil :ompound EQL SED 1-1 EQL SED 1-2 EQL SED 1-3 SED 1-4 NgIg N9fg pglg Naphthalene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd -Methylnaphthalene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd t-Methylnaphthalene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 rid nd Acenaphthylene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd • ,cenaphthene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd luorene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd Phenanthrene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd -,nthracene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd luoranthene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd Pyrene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd genzo(a)anthracene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd :hrysene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd i enzo(b)fiuoranthene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd .. ,enzo(a)pyrene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd ..Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd enzo(ghi)perylene 0.05 nd 0.10 nd 0.05 nd nd a,urrogate Standard Recoveries (Control Limits) • Acenaphthene-d10(19-121%) 66% 82% 84% 55% nthracene-d10(27-126%) 70% 77% 76% 66% 1.13enzo(a)pyrene-d12 (44-136%) 89% 93% 95% 88% L i IN ut.u.ANALYnc:ht.titxviCI 5'iSMcAdam NcK,V,Mississauga,Ontario.(:anada I_#% 1N9 Td:(cJtlS)R9I-i{i6(1 Fax:(c){}i)89)-ti575 Wats:l-litK3=2G3-91)fli www'.phiiipaoal)•tica l.cunt • Page 2 of 4 Client: MacViro Consultants Inc. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAH's) Project Reference:4092 Work Order Number:2150521B Units: Micrograms/gram (pglg)dry weight Date: 29-Jan-01 Matrix: Soil 1 Compound EQL SEE) 1-4X Ngla Naphthalene 0.05 nd 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.05 nd 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.05 nd Acenaphthylene 0.05 nd Acenaphthene 0.05 nd Fluorene 0.05 nd Phenanthrene 0.05 nd Anthracene 0.05 nd Fluoranthene 0.05 nd Pyrene 0.05 nd Benzo(a)anthracene 0.05 nd Chrysene 0.05 nd ,11 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.05 nd Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.05 nd Benzo(a)pyrene 0.05 nd Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.05 nd Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.05 nd Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.05 nd Surrogate Standard Recoveries (Control Limits) Acenaphthene-dl0(19-121%) 53% Anthracene-d10 (27-126%) 63% Benzo(a)pyrene-d12(44-136%) 88% 1 PimarA,Airnc:.ci.SERVICES 5735 McAdam Road,Mi+.sis.cauga,Ontario,Canada !:f/. I N9 'la(9f 5)890-8566 Fax:(905)H90-8575 Wai%:I-Ku11.?(ii-90-10 ww«cphilipanalyt ical.com M It Page 3 of 4 X 4r . 11 I 4 4 Client: MacViro Consultants Inc. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAH's) Project Reference:4092 Work Order Number:2150521 B Units: Micrograms/gram(pg/g)dry weight Date: 29-Jan-01 JMatrix: Soil Method Blank Spiked Method Blank JiEQL Upper % Lower Upper Compound pg/g Result Limit Accept Recovery Limit Limit Accept INaphthalene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 84 42 107 yes 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 89 44 114 yes 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 96 ,46 119 yes Acenaphthylene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 90 39 114 yes jAcenaphthene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 88 34 113 yes Fluorene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 91 36 120 yes Phenanthrene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 95 40 120 yes Anthracene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 98 42 124 yes Fluoranthene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 101 47 126 yes Pyrene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 99 46 125 yes Benzo(a)anthracene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 99 45 142 yes Chrysene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 97 46 148 yes Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 104 40 135 yes Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 102 40 129 yes Benzo(a)pyrene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 99 41 128 yes III Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 101 35 132 yes Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 110 34 137 yes Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.05 nd 0.05 yes 106 38 130 yes I Surrogate Standard Recoveries (Control Limits) tir Acenaphthene-d10 81 84 19 121 yes I Anthracene-d10 77 77 27 126 yes Benzo(a)pyrene-d12 98 103 44 136 yes s Milli ANAI.1'n(AI.SMUT:. 5735 McAdam R(Y.id,MiS.Sititi:ulg"a,Ontario.Canada I.f/. 1N9 'I'd:(905)890-H5(6 lax:(915)W)(H8575 Wail:1-f(86dh3•9 it www•.i hilip:inaiyiical.cum Page 4 of 4 Lir L Client: MacViro Consultants Inc. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAH's) L Project Reference:4092 Date: 29-Jan-01 Work Order Number:2150521 B Matrix: Soil .11 Legend: EQL=Estimated Quantitation Limit nd=Not detected above EQLLI Dup. =Duplicate I Date received:January 19, 2001 Date extracted: January 25, 2001 lir Date analysed:January 25&26, 2001 j ANALYTICAL METHOD: The soil samples(10 grams wet weight)were mixed with sodium sulfate and extracted with a 1:1 mixture of acetone:dichloromethane. The extracts were leaned up using alumina column chromatography. Analysis was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry using U.S. EPA Method 8270C (modified). lir I REPORT DISCUSSION: The EQL's for samples SED 1-2 and SED 2-1 were raised due to their high moisture content. t_ Note: Estimated quantitation limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably achieved within specified limits of precision and accuracy during routine laboratory operating conditions. NOTE:All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with normal professional standards using accepted testing methodologies and QA/QC procedures. Philip Analytical is limited in liability to the actual cost of the pertinent analysis done. Your samples will be retained by PASC for a period of 30 days following reporting or as per specific contractual arrangement. of JOB APPROVED BY: I. 1 ir IfniiMihai BilanilM.Sc. Chemist PI I II.n•ANAIMI Al.SIikVII.IC. 5735 McAdam Road,Mississauga.Ontario,Canada I.I/. 1N9 'lc1:(915)H90-8560 Fax:(905)890-N575 Wats:I-800-20i,Xli0 w%aw.hhilipanah•ucal.cam Ii A tigttUt4E fax b Jttli PHILIP ANALYTICAL SERVICES I . 5735 McAdam Road Tel:(905)890-8566 Work Order: Nommalmilmwom Mississauga,Ontario L4Z 1N9 Fax: (905)890-8575 " Wats: 1-800-263-9040 Comments: - _ , CHAIN OF� CUSTODY RECORD Client: C'),OCV t(G C.i``1f��1`�iu1�c 1:\``, 1L. . PAS Quote#: Page__I___of 2 i (10 Al\*A K:,r\e,,,),3..)( , U LOC.) Pou -- 1_� Client P.O.# \\f__O,i,l ('m\ral,c . L.'.i1c (C:7\-' L-109q Y.)-0,1-, i Client Project#: Contact: S\� C'-(2 -'j • Sampled by: S•(-r. 1(3' C'- 1 i y Phone: i(QO ).11' .`�"'t 10 Fax: LI`t 3 - '., ''''''‘'' '''i . Please specify Guideline(if applicable) Pi it \C.if.\ -:F:-�i rpE'.:T G.I�-1 k„i.�lrQ\�,_,,4_.6%.(,,(,) j 't7 ii Analysis Required: TAT(Turnaround Time) Invoice to(if other than above); , ' r I PLEASE PROVIDE ADVANCE NOTICE ,7i 1 FOP RUS l PROJECTS } (t S ` , 7 *some exceptions apply, please cont t Lab , STD 5-7 Business Days i RUSH Specify Date i ” .� t _ _ Ni Time .Sample Client Sample C.D. Date Time SCYTO 1."� Sample No.of Comments/Contamination/ # Sampled . Sampled 1 . (i { Matrix Containers , -' Site History I SE� 1�-1 1 �� of 1Z.1 I 1 , -5 k 3 SEC- 1-1 1 frn/ I 1..150 p„ Vim✓✓�'' , -- S. C', -P ,,i-,c,', 4 s. 1-y 1111 a1 3'•259-1\ 1./ V/\4 J — �'S W,7 . —'7�l-7- 5 StJ 1_LI 1111 01 3:2s pert ✓ ✓l� - _ C C L 1 I Samples Relinquished to PAS by / �y ,✓ Date: Time: Method of Shipment (Client Signature) f!�%�"`At . / 'r_:j ��EC ) 11(-211C) 1 '11 \1�l:/:3 • _ Samples Received in lab by: '� l ¢ Dates j Ti Condition of samples upon receipt at lab: t - (`,i 4k,-( -t;' �1 01 1 C51 f '1 q lr_;.C-) (, d Rev CO 3-to-00 White: Philip Yellow: Mail Pink: Receiver Goldenrod: Client : N2 00 - ? 1 9 2 2 MAR-13-01 11:37 From:PHILIP ANALYTICAL SERVICES CORPORATION 9058908575 T-B73 P.01/08 Job-065 tr=;=fleli IMEMENNIMMEMMEM 8-Mar-204 MACVIRO CONSULTANTS INC. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Page: 3' Markham, ON Copy; 1 of L3R 6S3 Attn: Mike Longland Received: 6-Mar-2001 15:46 Project: 4092 PO #: Job: 2151854 Status: Final Sediment Samples Total PCB's Aroclor 1254 DCBP SW 8081 SW 8081 CSC/ECD Sample Id ug/g uq(q % Recovery SED 1-1 <0.025 <0. 025 96 .0 % SED 1-2 <0.025 <0.025 94 .0 % SED 1-3 <0.025 <0.025 98 .0 % Blank <0.025 <0.025 89.0 % QC Standard (found) 89.0 % --- 312 . % QC Standard (expected) 100. % --- 100 . % Repeat SED 1-1 <0.025 <0.025 94 .0 % - DCBP= Decachiorobiphenyl (surrogate standard for PCBs) . All work recorded herein has been done in `accordance with normal professional standards using accepted testing methodologies and QA/QC procedures_ Philip Analytical is limited in liability to the actual cost of the pertinent analyses done unless otherwise agreed upon by contractual arrangement. Your samples will be retained by PASC for a period of 30 days following reporting or as per specific contractual arrangements. Job approved by: Signed: k1 • kt •.44 4,' Medhat Riskallah, Ph.D. , C.Chem. Manager, Gas Chromatography Section Pm:.u'A\At)'Ik40.skiA9l.r.% 5135 McAdam Rad,missiiiauga.U111ialU.Canada LIZ INV TO:(9O5)1491144566 Ica:(9115)liiM).8i7i Wats:1-801-203.9O4n 1) .1 MAR-13-0i II:3T From:PHILIP ANALYTICAL SERVICES CORPORATION 9058908575 T-873 P.Ot/QB Job-065 fiTrJ----frcHIAPage 1 of 7 _________......., _________, ANALYTICAL BERMCp_g .1 :.j Client: Macvuo Consultants inc. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAH's) Project Reference:4092 Work Order Number: 2151854B Units:Micrograms/gram Matrix:Soil (pg/g)dry weight Date: 13-Mar-01 Compound EQL SED 1-1 SED 1-2 SED 1-3 SED 1-4 P9/0 SED 1-4X Naphthalene 0.010 nd 2-Methylnaphthalenend nd nd nd nd 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.010 nd nd nd nd s 0.010 nd nd nd nd nd Acenaphthylene 0.005 nd Acenaphthene nd nd ndf 0.005 0.007 nd rid Morena nd nd f Phenanthrene 0.010 0.Q10 nd nd nd 0.010 0.076 0.012nd Anthracene 0.010 0.018 rid nd nd rluoranthene nd rid rid rid 0.010 0.091 0.026 0.013 nd Pyrene 0.010 0.079 0.023nd 3onzo(a)anthracene 0.010 0.022 0.011nd rid :hrysene nd rid nd nd 0.010 0.022 0.010 nd nd rid Benzo(b)fluorenthene 0.010 0.035 lenzo(k)fluoranthene 0.010 0.013 nd 0.018 ndnd nd nd nd nd nd ;ertzv(a)pyrene 0.010 0:024 nd Indena(1,2.3-cd)pyrene 0.010 0.019 0.01 1 nd nd nd nlbenzo(a,h)anthracene nd rid rid 0.005 nd nd nd nd enzo(ghi)peryiene 0.010 0.015 nd nd ' nd rid nd Surrogate Standard Recoveries(Control Limits) enaphthene-d10(19-121%) 50% 53% 49% 51% 5S55%Ithracene-d10(27-126%) 68% 3enzo(a)pyrene-d12 (44-136%) 611 k 5896%8 8% 50 % 58% 56°6 52% 1iI A 5735 MI.AIIAV RCMI].MhN\KU X.A.()A;T..41r1 f avarw 117 INll Iry. .,laMlil.ilM7.eif.�/. r....,,..-- .. A MAR-13-01 I1:38 From:PHILIP ANALYTICAL SERVICES CORPORATION 9058908575 T-873 P.L,E!:Q .:b-965 Page 5 of 7 ANni.Y11CALSTRVK S i ' Client MacViro Consultants Inc. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAH's) Project Reference:4092 Work Order Number:21518546 Units:Micrograms/gram (pg/g)dry weight Date: 13-Mar-01 Matrix:Soil Method Blank Spiked Method Blank EQL Upper % Lower Upper Compound pg/g Result limit Accept Recovery Limit Limit Accept Naphthalene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 49 42 107 yes 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 53 • 44 114 yes 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 60 48 179 yes Acenaphthylene 0.005 nd 0.005 yes 56 39 114 yes Acenaphthene 0.005 nd 0.005 yes 48 34 113 yes Fluorene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 52 36 120 yes Phenanthrene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 49 40 120 yes. Anthracene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 51 42 124 yes Fluoranthene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 62 47 126 yes Pyrene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 66 46 125 yes Benzo(a)anthracene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 47 45 142 yes Chrysene 0.010 rid 0.010 yes 48 46 148 yes Benzo(b)nuorantnene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 63 40 135 yes Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 63 40 129 yes Benzo(a)pyrene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 52 41 128. yes lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 53 35 132 yes Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.005 nd 0.005 yes 58 34 137 yes Benzo(ghi)perytene 0.010 nd 0.010 yes 50 38 130 yes Surrogate Standard Recoveries(Control Limits) Acenaphthene-d10 57% 49 19 121 yes Anthracene-d10 53% 49 27 126 yes Benzo(a)pyrene-d12 66% 59 44 136 yeS i T ix i'IY: lir s.....v..... a._....... . ... ..._ . ._.... .•r .... ....... ..._ _ -. ^i klAR-13-0I 11:38 Froa:PHILIP ANALYTICAL SERVICES CORPORATION 9058908575 T-873 P.08/08 Job-065 Page 7 of 7 A tNALY1 lCAL SFRVECES r Client: MacViro Consultants Inc. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's) • Project Reference:4092 Date: 13-Mar-0- Work Order Number: 21511354B Matrix:Soil Legend: EQL= Estimated Quantitation Limit nd=Not detected above EQL Dup.=Duplicate '=Detected below EQL but passed compound identification criteria Date received:March 6,2001 Date extracted: March 8, 2001 Date analysed:March 9-10,2001 ANALYTICAL METHOD: The soil samples(10 grams wet weight)were mixed with sodium sulfate and extracted with a 1:1 mixture of acetone:dichloromethane. The extracts were cleaned up using alumina column chromatography. Analysis was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry in selected ion monitoring mode using U.S. EPA Method 8270C(modified). Report Discussion: The EOL's for samples SED 2-1, SED 7-2, SED 9-1 &SED 10-1 were raised to account for the moisture. content of the samples. Note: Estimated quantitation limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably achieved within specified limits of precision and accuracy during routine laboratory operating conditions. NOTE All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with normalfe pro ssronal standards using accepted testing methodologies and QA/QC procedures. Philip Analytical is limited in liability to the actual cost Iof the pertinent analysis done. Your samples will be retained by PASC for a period of 30 days following reporting or as par specific contractual arrangement k.►OB APPROVED BY: lou.0 Kathy Hory , B.Sc. Chemist til{G XS-Si. P U.:. . I I'...... .;'r seri ...s. ........r... i iL Small Craft Harbours, Central& Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No.4766 APPENDIX E (CONTb): Supporting Information E-6A:Soil Sample Log Notes 4092-10 March 2001 w r r r r r i i i t E-6A Soil Sample Log Notes Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Jan. 17, 2001 SOIL GAS VAPOUR SAMPLE DEPTH READING SAMPLE SOIL DESCRIPTION (CM) (rprn) Brown, sty sanci. tine to meciurn SOIL 1-1 texured. 1 0 0 4092-10 March 2001 MacVir°o i i i II I! i i i i i 1 i Small Craft Harbours, Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX E (CONVOY Supporting Information E-6B:Sediment Sample Log Notes 4092-10 March 2001 I ac,'Viiro 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E-6B Sediment Sample Log Notes Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour, Jan. 17, 2001 ' "SAMPLE DEPTH . • ' SAMPLE • COMPOSITION (m) NOTEt SED 1-1 Brown, silty sand, fine textured. 1.4 Swampy odour detected. Brown, sandy silt with some clay, Sewage-like odour detected. Some leaves SED 1-2 fine textured. 1.3 at surface. Brown, sandy silt,fine to very fine SED 1-3 textured. 1.1 SED 1-4 Brown, sandy silt,fine textured. 1.1 SED 1-5 Brown, sandy silt, fine textured. 1.0 Brown, sandy silt, fine to very fine SED 1-6 textured. 10 Slight swampy odour detected. 4092-10 March 2001 MacVaro Ll II }' 1- 111 I^ I I 1 l Small Craft Harbours, Central&Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario--Site No. 4766 APPENDIX F: Correspondence 4092-10 Mardi 2001 MachVitro fI I I I I a I 1 I I I I I II 'I MacViro Consultants Inc. MaC 1]ro 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 FAXED Markham, Ontario L3R 6H3 (905) 475-7270 Fax (905) 475-5994 FAX TRANSMISSION JAN 112001 a-mail: sgonsalves@macviro.com Web Site: http://www.macviro.com To: Dave Thompson Date: January 11, 2001 Organization: MOE, London Regional Office Project: 4092 Fax No.: 519-873-5020 No. of Pages: 5 From: Steve Gonsalves (including Cover) Re: PWGSC Phase I Environmental Site Original to Follow: No Assessment Checklist — Port Burlwell Harbour Copy: MacViro has been retained by Public Works and Government Services Canada to conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessments of a number of federal small craft harbours. As part of this program, we have been asked to contact local government representatives. Please find enclosed an Environmental Site Assessment Checklist for the above noted federally owned small craft harbour. Also attached is a site plan for your reference. If you would arrange to have the checklist completed and faxed to Steve Gonsalves at (905) 475-5994 or your comments by email at sgonsalves@macviro.com at your earliest convenience, we would be most appreciative. Thank you very much for your assistance. If you have any questions, please call me at Ext. 269. Yours truly, MacViro Consultants Inc. Steve A. Gonsalves Environmental Technologist Des'gnang 2'nvironmentalcQc Energy Solutions Public Works and Government Services Canada Services gouvernementaux et Travaux publics Canada Architectural and Engineering Services,RPS Services d'architecture et de genie,5I krEnvironmental Services Unit Service de I'environnement 4900 Yonge Street- 11th Fl.,Wiliowdale,Ontario M2N 6A6 4900,rue Yonge, 11e etage.Wil!owdale(Ontario) M2N 6A6 Environmental Site Assessment Checklist for the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, London Regional Office SUBJECT PROPERTY: Federal waterlot with river entrance piers, breakwater and marginal wharves at Port Burwell Harbour, on Lake Erie. Municipality of Bayham. Please see attached plan. YES NO 1. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: Is MOE aware of any general environmental concerns or contamination on, or in the vicinity of the subject property,with respect to: (please elaborate as needed): -surface water? - - . . . ❑ ❑ -sediments? . e . . , . , . , . . . , . . , ❑ ❑ -soils ? ❑ El -groundwater? . . ❑ ❑ 2. SPILLS: Is MOE aware of any spills or releases reported on or adjacent to the subject property? ❑ 0 If yes,please describe briefly including date,material,quantity spilled,actions taken: 3. WASTE DISPOSAL: Does MOE have any records of active or closed waste disposal sites on or adjacent to the subject property? 0 0 If yes,please describe briefly: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Burwell Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Bayham) Page 1 of 3 YES No 4a) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES/SURVEYS: Have any environmental studies or surveys recently been carried out near the site by MOE or another agency? ❑ ❑ If yes,please give brief details as to the nature of the study/survey,date undertaken,and agency involved: 4b) Have there been any remediation or clean-up programs,activities,or inititatives in the local area? ❑ 0 If yes,please give brief details as to the nature remedial work and the parties involved: 5. SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENT QUALITY MONITORING: Does MOE regularly monitor surface water and/or sediment quality on or in the vicinity of the subject property? El ❑ If yes,please indicate the general location of the station(s)and if results are available: 6. REGULATORY HISTORY: i) Does MOE have any records of inspections or environmental 0 0 regulatory-actions concerning the property? ii) Have any permits or certificates of approval ever been issued ❑ ❑ for the site? If yes,please elaborate: 7. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Is MOE aware of any major land/shore 0 ❑ construction or development projects planned at or in the vicinity of the subject property? If yes,please elaborate: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Burwell Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Bayham) Page 2 of 3 YES No 8. OTHER CONCERNS: Is MOE aware of any other environmental 0 0 concerns or issues at the property, not outlined in any of the above? If yes,please elaborate: Your time and assistance in completing this questionnaire has been much appreciated. Name: Title: Telephone#: Mailing Address: • Signature: Date: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Burwell Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Bayham) Page 3 of 3 to ce 4 � N_ • 1.114040101114 W 1 N O sumo /'1Paa 0 Nati' r" nu se as d 017141 0 PART k PUT4 11R-6764 13 SSW TO TMT EASVR4T AS SET OJT Iii INVE6STEle I c OOWS1ENT DATER NOMABER 28TH, 1946 NO.467-I) s+r a><L CI4111 ON11[.NlRS — 'CORRAL MO ARCTIC 1 UM! p PMI 4:PENT 11R-6760 6 SUBJECT TO IJI EAAFLEM AS SET WI 05 1.NREGI$1L1(O 3 =WENT Dom we 70-RE 193 U 9 ( NO. 407-1u) i.‘" c04 PAM PIAN 11R-575O IS SUBJECT TO Ni LAMENT AS Sit OUT IN UNREGISTERED 1 DOCEYM1fT MEDT Kitt 5TH, 1950 (FILE LID- 447-I) I A PARIS 6, 17 ANO 11;PWI 11R-990 SMUT TO Ali EASOR NT 7S SLl OUT IN N i' INSIIS1UYEM ti0.t00784 (NOT SWAN). /,A/I 3 PARI 9:RAN t1R-990 AND PART 1 PON 11R-6474 SUBJECT 10 A Ii9C111-Of- Sr -- "' marmot misc. WAY AS Sl T 9J iMA9IEM 40.100794 PIM SH09N). 11 / Ft pa3~ -efr"-6. T....•:.::..%.::::.:.w w .`..rw�. -•. .....��!. !./• s mn��ID 1�YO�4lT MI vat pW IUb y `. .-... 0000.: .-.-. .•..•.`... O t1AI��ImamM 11M T -1 M1116 110ISQ OSL saO Oslt L. OM1Io 901109 A 3 I .. :'0000 .. ' mnm ns1► m ri°001:tal/MOT 011,1111 141 I •., . .lam. ' ... ' � .. r- s6®OR1gN s1Le aIp el rOID =cna s sarua1 'Mat 1 F R. A78T7: _• n1►ms. . � � . . . . -...00 . .. • • • • 111711111010 • ,, k . .. ..... ......,. 0000 • • r � sslY.-717 RJ1Ma 1 :.•.-� • • • •• • ' ••'•• _•••" Zi 41 bi- +L O i4MbV n.►%n �N 0 ` : m a s(0 t a r II. -' s Ervin,01.4M4 ` 4 -yam- MA ASUiai 1s�0 A�1 1 044 mei 4411•0 Puff=min. l>11:::1-1: I F _�. �"'�'r-- a.r 02I Pert 6; WO Mak N/A ago 10 P1w 110-s'MO tl, II 96101 tsar ay.rtoalla man TTR-Ti76D I 1TTQIRE�1XifA N/A -4 1 t +aL!? - 5V �r 01 TOTAL.AREA: 81.619ha. "' w�.m ill-alas +8 "may; muco�m tiro '1 asp a , -- '• 15/10/94 - JAC. .AO' II, �/ ---ill / / ��mem Mill `� 21/10/97 - NAG. AQ. ,;.;.:.s�� ...,,�.I tl ��.. a ,, IMOIN NIP p4,Pen iia-41rea E '�•�► �••� 14 MS .4010919019 OA FlaniiA•-nes 1 tt �i InO151/7111. , ` , i 1;{� p rams IOF4N0 am p r 4{ ."" �. �`• ,�„ --•1 1Y9TY� fl. CAA►III + '-- Y~ � � 02 447 1r -0 0u01n a 1/ 40.4 COMPILED PROPERTY o PLAN41,7 1 ---__ 40.44, 44.44 4 vv 4 SIE/J.CEC. IiP. 2 Q mow.9s '-'..r M al 441119. 20/02/91 30/01/ST —n w.i m .1YAWI:RL41 WAY RE RETURNED PORT BURWELL w -. . TO PROVINCE OM) _ _ OHT0160 11 • •I111 SIMPLE AS PER O.HAA. - '.^"4 1701-Pic r— 4195 FEB 23 2001 13 46 FR MCZCR — HER.& LIB. BR416 314 7362 TO 919054'r55yy4 F'.W2/02 Ministry of Citizenship, Ministere des Affaires civiques, Culture and Recreation de la Culture et des t.oisirs Ontario 400 University Avenue 400 avenue University Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Heritage and Libraries Branch Heritage Operations Unit Tel:(416)314-7132 Fax:(416)314-175 23 February 2001 John Chadwick Environmental Specialist MacViro Consultants Inc. 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Markham ON L3R 6113 RE: Archaeological Potential of Small Craft Harbours ESA Thank you for the information sent by fax, dated February 7, 2001, regarding ten Small Craft Harbour sites. Based on the mapping provided and the heritage databases and mapping of this Ministry, it has been determined that one of the harbour sites contains archaeologiocal resources which could potentially be negatively impacted through alterations to the subject property. The Leamington harbour contains the ship wreck "Nelsen" which is a wooden freighter and its associated artifacts. We recommend that you contact this Ministry's Marine Archaeologist, Peter Englebert(phone(613)244-4280; fax(613)244-4282))forfurther information on this site. If development activities (e.g., construction or dredging) are anticipated for this harbour site, an archaeological assessment must be conducted prior to the initiation of these activities. If title of this harbour site is to be transferred, all parties in the transfer should be made aware of the archaeological resource and agree to have an archaeological resource assessment conducted prior to any alterations to the harbour property. Should you wish to discuss this matter further,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1.7.1-W.f7-1{ John MacDonald Heritage Planner c. P.Engiebert, MTCR 1 M Ontario of Ithery - FOi COORD Environment FFR - 5 2001 Freedom of Information Request This form is for requesting documents which are in the tailuffaigratalgoetal concerns related to properties. Please refer to the guide on completion and use of this form. Our fax rio.is(416)314-4285. Requester Data For Ministry Use Only • Name.Company Name,Mailing Address and Email Address or Requester FON Request FOI Co-urdinatorReview Daae Mr.Steve A.Gonsalves SSS j12 1 Q 11 MacViro,Designing Environmental&Energy Solutions Date Request Received Fee Paid 600.90 Allstate Parkway a �Ip Marham,ON L3R 6H3 JAN 1 2 2001 40 ACCT Email address: Response Due Date > reception@macviro.com FEB 1 2 2001 TO a VISA C CASH TelephonelFas Nos, Your ProjecNReterence No. Signature/Print Name ot Requester Tel.905+475-7270 SAC g►EB 0 EAA0 SWR ❑ WCR Fax 905+475-5994 STEVE A.GONSALVES Request Parameters Municipal Address ILot Concession,Geographic Township (Municipal address essential for cities,towns or regions)PORT BURWELL-SMALL CRAFT HARBOUR- LOTS 11 &12,CONC.1,TWP.BAYHAM Present Property Owno(s}and Delete)of Ownership Public Works and Government Services Canada Previous Property Owner(a)and Date(s)of Ownership PreaenVPrevious Tenentis),(I veritable) Search Parameters Specify Year(s)Requested Files older than 2 years may require$60A0 retrieval cost. There is no guarantee that records responsive to your request will be located. Environmental concerns(General correspondence,occurrence reports,abatement) 1975 TO PRESENT Orders Spills 1975 TO PRESENT Investigations/prosecutions >Owner/tenant intbrmation must be provided 1975 TO PRESENT Waste Generator number/classes Certificates of Approval )Proponent information must be provided 1985 and prior records are searched manually.-Search fees in excess of$300.00 could be incurred,depending on the types and years to be searched. Specify Certificates of Approval number(s)(if known); If supporting documents are also required,mark SD box and specify type e.g.maps,plans,reports,etc. SD Specify Year(s)Requested air-emissions water-mains,treatment,ground level,standpipes&elevated storage,pumping stations(local&booster) sewage-sanitary,storm,treatment stomnweter,leachate&leachate treatment&sewage pump stations waste water-industrial discharges waste sites•disposal,landfill sites,transfer station;processing sates,incineretorsites waste systems- PCB destruction,mobile waste processing unit;haulers: sewage, non-hazardous&hazardous waste pesticides-licenses 0026(02/00) Pane 1 of MacViro . Designing Environmental -Energy Solutions 4092 January 9, 2001 Ministry of Environment Freedom of Information and Privacy Office 135 St. Clair Avenue.West Toronto, Ontario,M4V IPS Attention: Mr.Fred Ruiter Co-ordinator Request for Information under Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act Environmentallnformationitelating to T_en Small Craft Harbours Dear Sir: MacViro Consultants Inc. has been retained by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) to conduct enhanced Phase I environmental assessments for the following small craft harbours: 1. Clear Lake 6. Port Burwell 2. DiIlon's Cove(Georgian Bay) 7. Belle River 3. Parry Sound—Bob's Point Marina 8. Cedar Beach 4. Anderson 9. Leamington-Marina 5. Colchester 10. Port Dover-Marina A plan of each site is enclosed. Please refer to-the site plan notes for property legal descriptions. Also enclosed is a questionnaire that PWGSC has requested that your Ministry complete for each of the subject properties. This questionnaire relates to potential environmental concerns and indicates the type of information we are seeking under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. We are particularly interested in sediment quality data. A cheque in the amount of$350 ($5 application fee and one hour search time at $30 per hour for each site) is enclosed. We understand that we will be notified if any additional costs associated with this request are incurred. We would appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Yours truly, MacViro Consultants Inc. Steve A.Gonsalves,cal.. re a n� Environmental Technologist S` '^s4it,e re ac sg/SAG End. MacViro Consultants Inc. boo-go Allstate Parkway.Markham,Ontario L3R 6H3 tel:905475.7270 fax:905.475.5994 email:reception@macvlro.com website:www,macviro.com , -i 0 RI t3utitwl�.LL ,S1-t1 L.L C& Mr;T 1.kAltgcxza. G .1 r.. Dn. 1 rn C g"..M6191.4•11 962113 MAO Kart: . ! ~ PAR(]�PUN I1R-6760 Ii SU3.EC1 TD N I EASUIEM'AS SET 611 Ill IPPEGSTI:R � Z T OOCUYINf Ma NCNINOER 21011, 1948 (RIZ IND. 401-I) mail mu, amours PNTI 4;PUN 11R-678)tS StILCCT TO NI EASOID11 AS SCT 031 r UHRfG151TTt{U mom.ulo mem meow 3 DOCUMENT Oft RAY ]O=H. 1939 (n i NO. 407-10) PARI 5 PVN 119-6760 tS SURJEC1 10 AN fJISE]1EN1 AS SE1 OUT IN UNREl7STEP.CD T, O043.11Tll OATLD:NI k STK 1950 VILE NO. 4V-1) /, „ nr PARIS 6, Ti MN 13;PLAN 11R-990 9J&L V 0 NI EASEMENT As SCI OUT IN Al I ISilluili711 ND.100794 (1107 SPAM). "/r r PARE $PUN 116-490 AND PIAT FUR 11R-6474 5!l31LCT TO A R041-ill- mom MM. 4y WAY AS SEI IN MSTRIiIfNI 60.1017724 (H01 SHOW). +►p OV r .44/P' ..+-,.._ •-� _r' III —:. noeer M taiJl rare y r _ a areo .vire ls+ru w .,, t • wra J.a LW,ere tar r .i even,rarer a ednl eJa�r b I. • • eun�rreeaa�v vee MOB:AVM M nor M.MS 712o g'IL 0 :':.'.'=.'.......'... ...-. •.. a.(MAO ISOM Mtb U vim, dRam;T:..a.6 .�eea ru..waw tln.�.mo •Plast 7 t • 7Qf1_ • • a aria i i�s tui a as eaeseie .... .. ' ' (((. ran v=MI . .... %. .:-...::-..-.. ...:::: :............-. .. .:..:::........ ...........::.....-... i ._ ".." .". " . .".....-""......" •••" . - . . . . .. .. .. .. • , , . . .... . .••••• •••• •••. ••.•.. ••••".."••. . „ i ........ .. ..... .. .,.... . .. ...... . . . . . . .. , , .............. `1 Ii t ' CO •.. i . IrD11Xf et". G ... 1 a e l■tee II. x eperit.7151.124. r.. fr r d w M�}�Neuf m 192 21.1 OA •• tin r ••••• wyat/�IJf-RMO M{Y Pur! 6; ....122 22.1.2 �. rip i' A - awn rm: • eu p Greet Plan t 1R-R760 1I 0I ; N/A - I e rarer �� r M �� m m, 1 MAL AKA: 111.6191w. "' 1 Air V P32/Er01'~ '� MO Uri 917) lett w� ' / I aalral �, 16/70/94 - 3.0.7:. " / ' 21/10/47 - NFJG. ;: `1"'" - � _ .......1::::„.......010"." 1 e as/ai/sa — NJLc. IIJ ON F4. (.1 ■-414W the •elresJ i1.�,// - sera ib w�gni Ai Prwr AH 1; rtJrs 4+i r Air-•e7io• �� ) "-m? i ,mcriri ups+ 1 ,, .ti 1.1000 0 arll,Iiai 151. ~ .. .../ J�/. 1 eJt Jllaae tr, 1 J I m II fI OONPRE3} PROPERTY b 1 PLATT N / "Ls M.Fiw b utero 1.11./1.11C. $1.P. N ® w mia 211/12,191 33104/93 T ,~1B m .WAWRl01 NL*Y BE RCIEIRNEO ,,, 6URWELL ..r -. •-•TO PROIANCE (OMR)_., CHUM. 1FE SIMPLE /4 PER OSA", - 1WAgrn ---� PORT r� 4781 rp Public Works and Government Services Canada Services gouvernementaux et Travaux publics Canada Architectural and Engineering Services,RPS I� Services d'architecture et de genie,SI ha Environmental Services Unitsieis Service de I'environnement 4900 Yonge Street-11th FL,Willowdale,Ontario M2N 6A67 !� 4900,rue Yonge, 1 Ie etage,Willowdale(Ontario) M2N 6A6 Property Transfer Assessment Checklist for the Ontario Ministry of Environment, North Bay Area Office SUBJECT PROPERTY: Federal waterlot. See attached plan. YES No 1. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: Is MOE aware of any general environmental concerns or contamination on, or in the vicinity of the subject property, with respect to: (please elaborate as needed): -surface water? . . ❑ ❑ -sediments ? . . ❑ 0 -soils ? 0 o -groundwater? . . . 0 0 . 2. SPILLS: Is MOE aware of any soil's or releases reported on or adjacent to the subject property? 0 0 If yes,please describe briefly including date,material,quantity spilled,actions taken: 3. WASTE DISPOSAL: Does`MOE have any records of active or closed waste disposal sites on or adjacent to the subject property? El 0 If yes,please describe briefly: Property-Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot on Magnetawan River(Township of Archipelago) Page 1 of 3 YES No 4a) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES/SURVEYS: Have any environmental studies or surveys recently been carried out near the site by MOE or another agency? ❑ 0 If yes,please give brief details as to the nature of the study/survey,date undertaken,and agency involved: 4b) Have there been any remediation or clean-up programs, activities,or inititatives in the local area? 0 0 If yes,please give brief details as to the nature remedial work and the parties involved: 5. SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENT QUALITY MONITORING: Does MOE regularly monitor surface water and/or sediment quality on or in the vicinity of the subject property? 0 ❑ If yes,please indicate the general location of the station(s)and if results are available: 6. REGULATORY HISTORY: i) Does MOE have any records of inspections or environmental 0 0 regulatory actions concerning the property? ii) Have any permits or certificates of approval ever been issued 0 0 for the site? If yes,please elaborate: • 7. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Is MOE aware of any major land/shore 0 0 construction or development projects planned at or in the vicinity of the subject property? if yes,please elaborate: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot on Magnetawan River(Township of Archipelago) Page 2 of 3 YES No 8. OTHER CONCERNS: Is MOE aware of any other environmental 0 0 concerns or issues at the property, not outlined in any of the above? !f yes,please elaborate: Yourtime and assistance in completing this questionnaire has been much appreciated. Name: Title: Telephone*: Mailing Address: Signature: _ . Date: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot on Magnetawan River(Township of Archipelago) Page 3 of MacViro MacViro Consultants Inc. A 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Markham, Ontario L3R 6H3 FEB 13 2001 (905) 475-7270 • Fax (905) 475-5994 FAX TRANSMISSION e-mail: sgonsalves@macviro.com Web Site: http://www.macviro.com To: Dave Richards Date: February 13, 2001 Organization: MNR,Elmar District Office Project: 4092 Fax No.: 519-773-9014 No. of Pages:. 9 From: Steve Gonsalves (including Cover) Re: PWGSC Phase I Environmental Site Original to Follow: No Assessment Checklist - Port Burwell and Port Dover (Marina) Harbours Copy: Dave: As requested, please find attached copies of the Port Dover and Port Burwell Phase 1 ESA checklist. Should you have any questions, please call me at Ext. 269. Regards, Steve Des0nang Environmental&Energy Solutions APublic Works and Government Services Canada Services gouvernementaux et Travaux publics Canada Architectural and Engineering Services,RPS 7 Services d'architecture et de genie,Si Environmental Services Unit Service de 1'environnement 4900 Yonge Street-i 1th Fl„Willowdale,Ontario M2N 6A6 4900,rue Yonge, Tie etage,Willowdale(Ontario) M2N 6A6 Environmental Site Assessment Checklist for the Ministry of Natural Resources - Elmer District Office SUBJECT PROPERTY: Federal waterlot with a 314 berthing facility,wharves, launching ramps and floating docks at the Port Dover(Marina) Harbour, on Lake Erie. Municipality of Norfolk. Please see attached plan. Yes No 1. HABITAT: Is MNR aware of any sensitive or significant habitat areas on or adjacent to the subject property(e.g.classified or provincially-significant wetlands,near-shore habitats,coidwater streams,ANSIs, ESAs)? 0 0 If yes,please describe briefly: 2. PROTECTED SPECIES: Are any rare/protected/endangered plant or animal species known to be associated with the subject property or adjacent lands? 0 0 if yes,please describe briefly: 3.a) FISHERIES: Which fish species are common to this area? Please elaborate briefly: 3.b) Are any fish species likely utilizing the subject property or vicinity for the following: (please elaborate as needed) r -feeding/foraging 0 0 -spawning ❑ 0 -migration route 0 0 -other ❑ 0 Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Dover Harbour, Lake&rie(Municipality of Norfolk) Page 1 of 4 Yes No 4.a) WILDLIFE: Which wildlife species are common to the area? Please elaborate briefly: 4.b) Are any wildlife species likely utilizing the subject property or vicinity for the following:(please elaborate as needed) -feeding ❑ ❑ -shelter/nesting ❑ ❑ other ❑ ❑ 5.a) VEGETATION: Which species of terrestrial and/or aquatic vegetation are located on or adjacent to the subject property?Please elaborate briefly: 5.b) To MNR's knowledge,are pesticides(eg. herbicides,insecticides, etc.)used on or adjacent to the subject property? ❑ ❑ if yes please indicate which types and where they are used: 6. USE/ACTIVITY: To MNR's Knowledge,is the subject property or vicinity used for: -commercial fishing? ❑ 0 -recreational fishing? If yes,season: ❑ 0 -native fishery? .. ,. ❑ ❑ -hunting? If yes,season: ❑ ❑ -recreational boating/swimming/camping? 0 ❑ 7.a) ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: Is MNR aware of any general environmental concerns or contamination on,or in the vicinity of the subject property,with respect to: (please elaborate as needed): -surface water? . 0 ❑ -sediments? 0 0 -soils? ❑ ❑ -groundwater? 0 ❑ Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Dover Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Norfolk) Page 2 of 4 Yes No 7.b) To MNR's knowledge,have there been any spills or releases on or adjacent to the subject property? ❑ ❑ if yes,please describe briefly including date,material,quantify spilled,actions taken: 8.a) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES/SURVEYS: Have any environmental studies or surveys,recently been carried out near the site by MNR,or any other agency? 0 0 If yes,please give brief details as to the nature of the study/survey,date undertaken,and agency involved: 8.b) Have there been any remediation or clean-up programs,activities,or initiatives in the local area? 0 0 If yes,please give brief details as to the nature remedial work and the parties involved: 9. REGULATORY HISTORY; i) Does the MNR have any records of inspections or environmental regulatory actions concerning the property? 0 ❑ ii) Have work permit(s)ever been issued for the site? 0 0 If yes,please elaborate: 10. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Is MNR aware of any major construction or land/shore development projects planned at or in the vicinity of the subject property? ❑ ❑ If yes,please elaborate: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Dover Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Norfolk) Page 3 of 4 Yes No 11. OTHER CONCERNS: Is MNR aware of any other environmental concerns or issues at the property,not outlined in any of the above? 0 ❑ If yes,please elaborate: Your time and assistance in completing this questionnaire has been much appreciated. Name: Title: Telephone#: Mailing Address: Signature: Date: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Dover Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Norfolk) Page 4 of 4 0 MacViro Consultants Inc. NE 01 C fro 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 600 Markham, Ontario L3R 6H3 E (905) 475-7270 • Fax (905) 475-5994 FAX TRANSMISSION F e-mail: sgonsalves®macviro.com JAN to Web Site: http://www.macviro.com To: Kyle Kruger Date: January 11, 2001 Organization: Municipality of Bayham Project: 4092 Fax No.: 519-866-3884 No. of Pages: 6 From: Steve Gonsalves (including Cover) Re: PWGSC Phase I Environmental Site Original to Follow: No Assessment Checklist - Port Bulrwell Harbour Copy: MacViro has been retained by Public Works and Government Services Canada to conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessments of a number of federal small craft harbours. As part of this program, we have been asked to contact local government representatives. Please find enclosed an Environmental Site Assessment Checklist for the above noted federally owned small craft harbour. Also attached is a site plan for your reference. If you would arrange to have the checklist completed and faxed to Steve Gonsalves at (905) 475-5994 or your comments by email at sgonsalves@macviro.com at your earliest convenience, we would be most appreciative. Thank you very much for your assistance. If you have :any questions, please call me at Ext. 269. Yours truly, MacViro Consultants Inc. 4.- Steve A. Gonsalves Environmental Technologist Designing t'nvzronmental& 'Energy Solutions rill Public Works and Government Services Canada Services gouvernementaux et Travaux publics Canada kArchitectural and Engineering Services,RPS tg Services d'architecture et de genie,SI m Environmental Services Unit Service de I'environnement ,4900 Yonge Street-71 th FL,Willowdale,Ontario WN 6A6 4900,rue Yonge, T to etage,Willowdale(Ontario) M2N 6A6 Environmental Site Assessment Checklist for the Municipality of Bayham SUBJECT PROPERTY: Federal waterlot with river entrance piers, breakwater and marginal wharves at Port Burwell Harbour, on Lake Erie. Municipality of Bayham. Please see attached plan. YES No 1. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: Is the Town aware of any general environmental concerns or contamination on, or in the vicinity of the subject property,with respect to: (please elaborate as needed): -surface water? El 0 -sediments ? F 0 ❑ -soils? . . . . _ . . . . ❑ ❑ -groundwater? . ..<., . . . . . ❑ ❑ 2. SPILLS: Is the Municipality aware of any spills or releases reported on or adjacent to the subject property? 0 ❑ If yes,please describe briefly including date,material,quantity spilled,actions taken: 3. WASTE DISPOSAL: Does the Municipality know of any active or closed waste disposal sites on or adjacent to the subject property? 0 0 if yes,please describe briefly: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Burwell Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Bayham) Page 1 of 4 YES No 4a) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES/SURVEYS: Have any environmental studies or surveys recently been carried out near the site by the Municipality or another agency? E.g.sediment or water quality data. ❑ ❑ If yes,please give brief details as to the nature of the study/survey,date undertaken,and agency involved: 4b) Have there been any remediation or clean-up programs, activities,or inititatives in the local area? 0 0 If yes,please give brief details as to the nature remedial work and the parties involved: 5. HABITAT: is the Municipality aware of any sensitive or significant habitat areas on or adjacent to the subject property(e.g. classified or provincially-significant wetlands, near-shore habitats,coldwater streams, 0 ❑ ANSIs, ESAs)? If yes,please describe briefly: ry _ l 6. SITE SERVICES:-To the Municipality's knowledge, are any of the following located on or adjacent to the property: -sewer line/outfall? . . . ._ 0 0 -water line/intake? 0 0 -power line/cable,transformer? 0 0 -telecommunications? 0 0 -other? . . , . . .... . ... .. ❑ 0 Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Burwell Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Bayham) Page 2 of 4 YES No 7. PESTICIDES: To the Municipality's knowledge, are any pesticides (eg. herbicides, insecticides,fungicides, etc.) used on or adjacent to the subject property? ❑ ❑ If yes please list which types are used: 8. USE/ACTIVITY: To the Municipality's knowledge, is the subject property or vicinity used for: -commercial fishing? ❑ ❑ - recreational fishing ? If yes, season: . 0 ❑ - native fishery? ❑ ❑ -hunting ? If yes,season: ❑ ❑ - recreational boating/swimming/camping ? . . . , , , . , . . ... . ...__. , . , 0 0 9. HERITAGE: Is the Municipality aware of any heritage sites (eg. historically,culturally, archaeologically significant sites)on or adjacent to the subject property? ❑ 0 If yes please describe briefly: 10. REGULATORY HISTORY: Does the Municipality have any records of citations or by-law infractions for the subject property? 0 0 If yes please elaborate: 11. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Is the Municipality aware of any major land/shore construction or development projects planned at or in the vicinity of the subject property? ❑ ❑ If yes,please elaborate: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Burwell Harbour, Lake Erie(Municipality of Bayham) Page 3 of 4 YES No 12. OTHER CONCERNS: Is the Municipality aware of any other environmental concerns or issues at the property, not outlined in any of the above? ❑ ❑ If yes,please elaborate: Your time and assistance in completing this questionnaire has been much appreciated. Name: Title: Telephone#: Mailing Address: Signature: Date: Property Transfer Assessment-Public Works and Government Services Canada Small Craft Harbours Waterlot at Port Burwell Harbour, Lake Erie{Municipality of Bayham) Page 4 of 4 t� A ,. 1 Ni 1IM ormanliaPill 1111 Q e11M1 N G MOM 4D0 O {{y�,am�,�,, .e. am a O Mt ' PaR1 5 PEN4 11R-6760 6%RE!TO AR EASEYEET AS SET 0.17 1N O E01S117271 COCOON"TAlm NOMMEN 28Th, 1646 OLE 110, 407-I) s►uu =sun Ilr acarxs '" Mita AW mow Atom J' PART 4;PUN 111-6760 R Salta TO Ni EASEL ENT AS SET OUB IN WR£GtS1E1NO a ODCUWENT ONIE21:NAT SOU 19.19 (TLE NO. 407-10 ,...L... C4 BART 5:PUW 11R-6760 IS 1I191ECE TO Ni EAS JIINT AS SE1 OUT TI UN1 StEREU 1 �„, D00.111311 MW WTI STN, 1950 (F1EE H0. 417-1) N 4 .t T1 PARTS 6, 12 AND 13;Pl1W 11R-990 9J91CC1 co Ni mom 1$SET OUT TI 7 'j o INSi�LIYfl{T!!0.100784 OCT SWAN). /f. ���.+++ y PARI 9,FUN 11R-990 AND WO 7: PLAN 11R-6474 Saul TO A RC,"Hi-OF- exam w,n� 'S• MAY AS SET IN RISIRLWE?i1 N0.100794(NOT SNOW), • AgII04-5 ' • .......•: -1 rrrrta �eu�e�tloa 4• 1. w�TOMO v MOM WNW a qC1F to m /471+mi1 am&m.ggoo� o CA UALDI .10401T 11114 .= JD LA a p 0000 1 r r:.. .__.illa• .'7.`, NM��i=11N it • • �1O [OM giq■i NIL R • ,, 1 R'' 7 -. maw 114116 P:10 OMNI . k . - . " Y l ...... ....., ...... ....... .„...... .... . . ....J. -e- to • ���u17 �K�aar O y iailrt.. 11, ' s 1 1w�U OM7 wm/0 off t^ 0.11MCD IN MIL .�'� II 4 ..• war',W�.tmn ........;or . Cn r00 ow owl�rnw�1. tN irr ✓ WM" ..... -.'y,.".-.".. -. Ile,"'------ I fis'1 t�A-A7A0 .., PW't 6; Loo MEC M.�A 01 co di - �,a _ . Wa. moot NNW , Mtn 11R-8760 I ITAIT AREA N/A •`+ 41 1 ', \ MA — i , _~ 1m Aoa TOTAL AREA: B1.611ha. "' rPord{rn-rieotea 9 4 _ Y` _ Dnp #L Lraa Mill (1 i 1 ref 1 +� ' 21/10;87 - N.F.G. 4 y`t 0,-...iiatisto..110111i i 1 WOW MP r�SIt..rx0 ,meq Pori s roi Kell pi I iiA•.r9ro imp Port Os R rr�sr luas+ t .. ....__.. 1 .rz74000 ` 4PTw,i1AJLIo a1 littef 1 • orete.r ,I. 1 f ... ......4. "0/...- m jN erdln Ja.�-'I A 11 1 // � —_ COMPILED PROPERLY Q 1 PLANca r......' o S.N.P.0$. NP. N u 11 iiCQOp.ID w,•1.. ma nnall - IN MO.i.M. 20/02/91 MR/4/95T 1..... 61. • WAIERL.OT NAYEf RETURI EO (.1 -- --.TO PROMNCE(oMNR� PORT @URWELL __ aNraeo Tss- - = TEE SiMP1E AS PER 9.KAA 0.-.... p1C r— 4766 f apt srTECHNICAL STANDARDS & s�eo M'o' SAFETY AUTHORITY 4th Floor,West Tower 3300 Bloor Street West TSSA Toronto,Ontario Canada M8X 2X4 A.Fr1'AUZ��r Corporate Services Division Tel: (416)325-5054 Fax: (416) 326-1663 February 5, 2001 File: #FS10155 John Chadwick MacViro Consultants Inc. 600-90 Allstate Parkway MARKHAM ON L3R 6H3 Dear Sir: RE: Lots 11 & 12, Conc. 1,Port Burwell, Ontario—Your File#4092 This is with reference to your request and fee of$50.00+GST, for information on the above location. After searching our files,there appear to be no outstanding instructions, incident reports, fuel spills, or contamination records respecting the above mentioned property. We have no record of retail facilities or underground storage tanks licensed or registered at the above address. It should be noted that the Fuels Safety Division did not licence or register private fuel underground/aboveground storage tanks prior to January of 1990. Also note that the Fuels Safety Division does not register private furnace oil or waste oil tanks in apartments, office buildings, residences etc. or ABOVEGROUND gas or diesel tank Yours truly, Carol Robyn Coordinator Public Information Services "To make people's lives better by enhancing public safety" Visit our web site:www.tssa.org Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX 0: RPISCS Module Input Screens 4092-10 March 2001 Mac4 jird .I A 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 it Contaminated Sites Srr r r a i 1,"L " Lt r;J ar r , • Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour List of Lights Number 580,581, sal Province Ontario Land Descriptor Unit 54022,7305 Sector Small Craft Harbours Status Candidate Custodian IFF&OSCH Site Location Front of Lot 11,conc.L Street Address Front of Lot 11,Con.I City Port Burwell Postai Code Latitude 42-38-11 Longitude 80-48-28 Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of East Steel Dock CS Number 004 Status Under Assessment Regional File Number National File Number Description Location of Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour on Big Otter Creek(Lake Erie),18 m west and 38 m north of Contamination east concrete and steel dock(northwest corner). Latitude 60 60 60 Longitude 90 60 60 Action Plan Additional Information Latitude:42 63 98.5 N Longitude:-80 80 56.5 W Sediment sample analytical results were compared to the Canadian Sediment Quality Guideline criteria(Table 1)outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999),and the Background and Lowest Effect Level(LEL)criteria outlined in the Guideline for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario(August 1993). Total Assessment Cost $805.19 Total Remediation Cost _ ijsrt Contaminated Sites Summary I- Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour List of Lights Number 580,581, aura Province Ontario Land Descriptor Unit 54022,7305 u r Sector Small Craft Harbours Status Candidate Custodian F&OSCH Site Location Front of Lot 11,conc.L Street Address Front of Lot 11,Con.1 i City Port Burwell Postal Code Latitude'42-38-11 • Longitude 80-48-28 Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of East Steel Dock CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Regional File Number National File Number Description Location of Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour on Big Otter Creek(Lake Erie),23 m west and 36 m north of Contamination east concrete and steel dock(northwest corner). Latitude 0 0 0 Longitude 0' 0 0 Action Plan Additional Information Sediment sample analytical results were compared to the Canadian Sediment Quality Guideline criteria(Table 1)outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999),and the Background and Lowest Effect Level(LEL)criteria outlined in the Guideline for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario(August I993). Total Assessment Cost I $805.19 Total Remediation Cost Contaminated Sites Summary Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour List of Lights Number 580,581, - <sz Province Ontario Land Descriptor Unit 54022,7305 a Sector Small Craft Harbours Status Candidate f Custodian F&.OSCH Site Location Front of Lot 11,conc.L Street Address Front of Lot 11,Con.I City Port Burwell Postal Code Latitude 42-38-11 - t Longitude 80-48-28 Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of Concrete Pier CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Regional File Number National File Number Description Location of Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour on Big Otter Creek(Lake Erie),60 m north and 12 m west of Contamination concrete pier(north corner)._ Latitude 0 0 0 Longitude 0 0 0 Action Plan Additional information Sediment sample analytical results were compared to the Canadian Sediment Quality Guideline criteria(Table 1)outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999),and the Background and Lowest Effect Level(LEL)criteria outlined in the Guideline for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario(August 1993). Total Assessment Cost $805.19 Total Remediation Cost Contaminated Sites Summary Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour List of Lights Number 580,581, SAZ Province Ontario Land Descriptor Unit 54022,7305 R Sector Small Craft Harbours Status Candidate Custodian P&OSCH Site Location Front of Lot 11,conc.1. Street Address Front of Lot 11,Con.1 City Port Burwell Postal Code Latitude 42-38-11 Longitude 80-48-28 Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Concrete Pier CS Number 003 Status Under Assessment Regional File Number National File Number Description Location of Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour on Big Otter Creek(Lake Erie),26 m west of concrete pier Contamination (north corner). Latitude 60 60 60 Longitude 90 60 60 Action Plan Additional Information latitude:42 63 98.5 N Longitude:-80 80 56.5 W Sediment sample analytical results were compared to the Canadian Sediment Quality Guideline criteria(Table 1)outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999),and the Background and Lowest Effect Level(LEL)criteria outlined in the Guideline for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario(August 1993). Total Assessment Cost - $805.19 Total Remediation Cost Contaminated it ummar 7:_;411.0, Site Name Port Burwell Site Number'S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour List of Lights Number 580,581, - - - sal Province Ontario Land Descriptor Unit 54022,7305 s Sector Small Craft Harbours Status Candidate Custodian F&OSCIi Site Location Front of Lot 11,conc.L Street Address Front of Lot 11,Con.I City Port Burwell Postal Code Latitude 42-38-11 Longitude 80-48-28 Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property CS Number 002 Status Under Assessment Regional File Number National File Number Description Location of Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour on Big Otter Creek(Lake Erie),11 m east of west wharf(east Contamination of Talismen ASTs) Latitude 60 60 60 Longitude 90[ 60 60 Action Plan Additional Information Latitude:42 63 98.5 N Longitude:-80 80 56.5 W Sediment sample analytical results were compared to the Canadian Sediment Quality Guideline criteria(Table 1)outlined in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999),and the Background and Lowest Effect Level(LEL)criteria outlined in the Guideline for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario(August 1993). Total Assessment Cost $805.19 Total Remediation Cost Contaminated SitesSummary _.� Y Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour List of Lights Number 580,581, 5R2 Province Ontario Land Descriptor Unit 54022,7305 R Sector Small Craft Harbours Status Candidate co, Custodian F&OSCH Site Location Front of Lot 11,conc.I. Street Address Front of Lot 11,Con.I City Port Burwell Postal Code Latitude 42-38-1 ILongitude 80-48-28 Contaminated Site Name Surface Soil-Beach Property CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Regional File Number National File Number Description Location of (Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour on Big Otter Creek(Lake Erie),55 m east of Robinson Street Contamination d allowance on east beach property. Latitude 0 0 0 Longitude 0 0, 0 1 Action Plan Additional Information Soil sample analytical results were compared to the residentiauparkland land use criteria in the Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE)Guideline for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario (September 1998)and the residential/parkland land use criteria in the CCME Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999). Background level is the guideline from MOE Table F for each parameter. Total Assessment Cost $805.19 Total Remediation Cost Elli _ — — - , Contaminated Sites Summary T I - Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour List of Lights Number 580,581, i42 Province Ontario Land Descriptor Unit 54022,7305 Sector Small Craft Harbours Status Candidate Custodian F&OSCH Site Location Front of Lot 11,conc.L Street Address Front of Lot 11,Con.I City Port Burwell Postal Code Latitude 42-38-11 Longitude 80-48-28 Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant CS Number 001 Status Under Assessment Regional File Number National File Number Description Location of Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour on Big Otter Creek(Lake Erie),11 m east of west wharf(east Contamination.of sewage treatment plant). Latitude 60 60 60' Longitude 90 60 60 Action Plan Additional information Latitude:42 63 98.5 N Longitude:-80 BO 56.5 W Sediment sample analytical results were compared to the Canadian Sediment Quality Guideline criteria(Table 1)outlined in the CCMB Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines(1999),and the Background and Lowest Effect Level(LEL)criteria outlined in the Guideline for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediment Quality in Ontario(August 1993). TOC sample concentration exceeds the Ontario PSQ Guidelines since it is equal to the LEL Total Assessment Cost $805.19 Total Remediation Cost r. s I ..r4 T" r r,,.+..sF .- , Arai t.h- . {_- + - .y�rti FU :� -.'--.6"117-7-T-, y — - „� 4 Activities a =l '� .` i :10,,er.;*"" Wit. ` _ -.as-4L-714-:_.,� __,..111,-.N-,, 4 -1. -' .4.-v.-?..—. ,r,".. Y°-. „" ...:ii- A `� _ `•r - 3 - ' _..7...-_,..-1.:_.....-aYcr� . '..w f:" .... - .-.". ' Y' ..-. - } mss^-1" ,. :".:;'..,.-f-. ,.,��-,..1.t"- f,rn,. >e a'le or f .r ,.,,i`64.-t.` 'f' -.4-r--- , - . ' m' --="I- s_ Region: Central/Arctic Site Number Site Na Site r:•c 1.tor P .v ce Sector S C 00100 Pon Burwell Small Craft Hatbotu Ontario Small Craft Harbours Contaminated Site Name Status CS Number Sediment-North of Concrete Pier Assessed-No Action Required Activity Leval Activity Description Completion Date Fiscal Year Expenditure Phase!ESA i'Enhanced Phase 1 ESA with limited sediment and soil sampling i 52000-2001 7 $805.19 Sediment-North of East Steel Dock Under Assessment 004 e. Activity Level Activity Description Completion Date Fiscal Year Expenditure Phase I ESA I"Enhanced Phase I ESA with limited sediment and soil sampling I"2000.200t I $805.19 Sediment-Vicinity of Concrete Pier Under Assessment 003 Activity Level Activity Description Completion Date Fiscal Year Expenditure !Phase I ESA I;Enhanced Phase 1 ESA with limited sediment and soil sampling i1A00-2001 $805.19 Sediment-Vicinity of Easi Steel Dock Assessed-No Action Required Activity Level Activity Description Completion Date Fiscal Year Expenditure /Phase I ESA 1Enhanced Phase 1 ESA with limited sediment and sot]sampling L [i000-2oo1 [ 5805.19 J Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Under Assessment 001 Pian Activity Level Activity Description Completion Date Fiscal Year Expenditure !Phase 1 ESA _ Enhanced Phase 1 FSA with limited sediment and soil sampling J L 2001 _ $805.19 Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property Under Assessment • 002 Activity Level Activity Description Completion Date Fiscal Year Expenditure !Phase I ESA I IFnhane d Phase 1 ESA with limited sediment and soil sampling. _11 I[2000-2001T j i S80S.19] Surface Soli-Beach Property Assessed-No Action Required Activity Level Activity Description Completion Date Flan!Year Expenditure Contaminated ik. Activities - ,- ._ Region: Central/Arctic Sete Numbers Name Sit.Descriptor frovince Sector Phase 1 ESA :Enhanced Phase 1 ESA with limited sediment and soil sampling. 2000-2001 S$05.19 Total Site Expenditure f r-35,b'-d.33- Total Regional Expenditure 1 '-_•33.63 33' _ �-� .�112--'.* --T.,::'':,, �•--_ c _ ...,�'^ g,-" � :-_>a- * rs K'p S° } r �,♦� �i '>Y -sA7..:14- a mss .1.-" �-5- .rnr r' a..° - 1.7 .• 119 - E � .ka- ? � -Z4:-,t24-741'. "t -`: e; • - ce` "- ) 3 y �r- ,�_,.3 :•� �` ' = ' � f�� " rY� .7;1.4% ..t � r•.� 4-4-'1,-,..,--:-. � L?, y : mi ' �_ - .1._ ufa n F�2,f � � . '�.Fi ' 1-14.2• � a - �• -941 '_� . _ .-- l*r - -£- - s..5s..x�, s '� � ,� ` .sx�#n,c- . �r' , ?3a�i�.>ri.3�. ..y �4z` . Region: Central/Arctic Site Number Site Name Site Descriptor Province Sector ..nrappnal•IMMEMP4.111.00.-103.94.1selansimmono.ma.,mp.a,.- S C 00100 Port Burwell Small Craft Harbour Ontario Small Craft Harbours Contaminated Site Name Status CS Number Sediment-North of Concrete Pier Assessed-No Action Required Sampling Date Media Parameter . Measurement Federal Criteria Criteria Other Criteria Criteria Samples Min Max Units Wednesday,January 17,2001 Sediment I-Methylnaphthalene 0 0 uglg 1999 CCME CEQ 1993 Ontario PSQG 2 Guidelines(Interim) (LEL) Sediment-North of East Steel Dock Under Assessment 004 '° Sampling Date Media Parameter Measurement Federal Criteria Criteria Other Criteria Criteria Samples Min Max Units Wednesday,January 17,2001 Sediment Arsenic 1 1 ugig 1999 COME CEQ 5.9 1993 Ontario PSQG 6 1 Guidelines(Interim) (LEL.) Sediment-Vicinity of Concise Pies Under Assessment 003 Sampling Date Media Parameter Measurement Federal Criteria Criteria Other Criteria Criteria Samples Min Max Units Wednesday,January 17,2001 Sediment 1-Methylnaptrthakne 0 0 ugig 1999 COME CEQ . 1993 Ontario PSQG 1 Guidelines(Interim) (LEL) Sediment!•YtdnityotEast SteelDoca •'.Assessea-TbAa6atRequire°d ' Sampling Date Media Parameter Measurement Federal Criteria Criteria Other Criteria Criteria Samples Min Max Units Wednesday,January 17,2001 Sediment Arsenic 0.4 0.4 ugig 1999 CCME CEQ 5.9 1993 Ontario PSQG 6 1 Guidelines(interim) (LEL) Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage'lteatnrnat P Under Assessment 001 Sampling Date Media Parameter Measurement Federal Criteria Criteria Other Criteria Criteria Samples Min Max Units Wednesday,January 17,2001 Sediment 1-Methylnaphthalene 0 0 ugig 1999 CCMBCEQ 1993 Ontario PSQG Guidelines(Interim) (LEL) ,}''''' ''',---y, ''1y�,0 IV _.- ;;; sz•' .;54'�..:.-+ 'x , -t.•- Lc: y"�.�"~"� :'- 2 2': , ...„...Y.� r-r. r•}-3...i...__17--_1-�ma`&.,.�':ryte_. 1.:,...."_-'2; -mss... _a.er�.��[�c.7.,z .-'a...4`'-1:::cs..--'.-`e a-- sem. r.,-1.1..S1-4-.7111-41" .fit•-sem' -+ �: =,. Sediment•Vicinity of Talismen Property Under Assessment 002 Sampling Date Media Parameter Measurement Federal Criteria Criteria Other Criteria Criteria Samples Min Max Units Wednesday,January 17.2001 Sediment l-Methylnaphthalene 0 0 egg 1999 CCME CEQ 1993 Ontario PSQG Guidelines(Interim) (LEL) Surface Soil-Beach Property Assessed-No Action Required Sampling Date Media Parameter Measurement Federal CriteriaCriteria Other Criteria Criteria Samples Min Max Units Wednesday,January 17,2001 Soil Antimony 0.1 0.1 ug/g CCME 1999 CEQ MOE 1998 Guideline 13 1 Guidelines Table S (Residential/Parkland) (Residendal/Parkland) r = _ , ,. Contaminated Site Issues y Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property CS Number[002 IStatus Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify Nutrients Impacts .. Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment 0 Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status - Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ • .1 Contaminated Site Issues 111111116 _ Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant CS Number 1001 Status Under Assessment L� Description Contaminant Category Petroleum Hydrocarbons and PAHs Specify [ Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑d Status 'None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ DumpinglWaste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Mario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Concrete Pier CS Number o3 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Specify Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment j Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status r Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell ] Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Concrete Pier CS Number 003 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Petroleum Hydrocarbons and PAHs I Specify impacts I - Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment N Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping!Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Url tt E Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number L C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property CS Number 1002 Status Under Assessment II Description Contaminant Category 1Other(Specify) Specify PCBs Impacts Soil ❑ Status - Ground Water [i Status Sediment ® Status[None II Surface Water ❑ Status Mr ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Coast.Materials LI Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area r Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ r°. Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Talisman Property CS Number 002 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify Pesticides Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment © Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status Air 0 Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump Hazardous Const.Materials Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ DumpinglWaste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated nat Site Issues _ Site Name Port Burwell Site Number IS C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Concrete Pier CS Number 003 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category'Other(Specify) Specify!Pesticides � J Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water I Status Sediment ® Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status 1 Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ DumpingMaste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ I ContaminatedSite Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 • Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property CS Number 002 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Petroleum Hydrocarbons and PAHs Specify Impacts Soil Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment [] Status None I Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated i Site issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Concrete Pier CS Number 003 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify PCBs Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water f Status Sediment © Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ ��' � � � -�' #���•+ T �lll �yam ` l(� 1 . .f -16 ontaminated Site Issues TtSite Name Port Burwell 1 Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor iSmall Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property CS Number 002 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Specify Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑d Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number IS C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Surface Soil-Beach Property CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Specify Impacts Soil Status None Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ • Contaminated Site Issues - 1 Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour _ Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant CS Number 001 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify 'Nutrients(TOC) F I Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment © Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown WI Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site Issues - Site Name Port Burwell Site Number IS C 00100 1 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant QS Number Jool Status Under Assessment I Description Contaminant Category 'Heavy Metals Specify f Impacts Soil Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ® Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ I I Contaminated Site Issues • Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant CS Number 001 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify Pesticides Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment © Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources • Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ . Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Igti r;, ra 'T-5 rXI� f r. Y'x%;rl,��"y� e?. y, Cott Site It '. - ,� ',_ .1 Site Name Port Burwell Site Number IS C 00100 I Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Sewage Treatment Plant CS Number 001 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify PCBs Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment © Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) 0 Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ 7 Contaminated Site Issues • Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour `. Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property CS Number 002 Status Under Assessment Description — Contaminant Category Other(Specify) I Specify Total Ammonia Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment © Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ 'Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor'Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of East Steel Dock CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Specify Impacts Soil ❑ Status - Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑d Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status r Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ j111 _I F Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name'Sediment-North of East Steel Dock CS Number 004 I I Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ DumpinglWaste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site issues �w e Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor'Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of Fast Steel Dock CS Number 004 e Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A Impacts Soil LI Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ ContaminatedContammated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name 'Sediment-North of East Steel Dock CS Number 004 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Specify Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment © Status None - Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ , Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of East Steel Dock CS Number 004 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify Nutrients Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ _ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ DumpinglWaste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ 6: ,,` - , � �. 'r 1 ,_xG _�' i ;x z r-1 ` A • r'1 �I a - ,1 I a i, _ rh 1.3 r 'W f:P6 r� �:,� rig ■ lair -. -1° Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor'Small Craft Harbour Province`Ontario Contaminated Site Name 'Sediment-Vicinity of East Steel Dock CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A • Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries [] Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Sita Issues j Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of Concrete Pier CS Number 003 Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify Nutrients Impacts_ Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ® Status Actual Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ ontamin d Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of East Steel Dock CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries [] Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site issues . Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of East Steel Dock CS Number 004 • Status Under Assessment Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A Impacts Soil ❑ Status v Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources • Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-Vicinity of East Steel Dock CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify Nutrients Impacts Soil ❑ Status I Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑r Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of Concrete Pier CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A Impacts - Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status P Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ DumpinglWaste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated i Issues . Site Name!Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor„Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of Concrete Pier CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ L Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of Concrete Pier CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Petroleum Hydrocarbons and PAHs Specify Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment © Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries U Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of Concrete Pier CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify Nutrients impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑d Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ :11tr�r rii; Contaminated Site Issues Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment-North of Concrete Pier CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description - Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Specify r Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment Q Status None Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area ❑ Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site Issues d _ Site Name Port Burwell Site Number S C 00100 -- i Site Descriptor Small Craft Harbour Province Ontario Contaminated Site Name Sediment Vicinity of East Steel Dock CS Number Status Assessed-No Action Required Description Contaminant Category Other(Specify) Specify N/A Impacts Soil ❑ Status Ground Water ❑ Status Sediment ❑ Status Surface Water ❑ Status Air ❑ Status Sources Batteries ❑ Ash Dump ❑ Hazardous Const.Materials ❑ Landfill ❑ Storage Tank(s) ❑ Waste Storage Area LI Dumping/Waste ❑ Fuel Cache ❑ Chemical Storage Area ❑ Unknown ❑ Other(Specify) ❑ Contaminated Site Issues i . / . . | . ' �r� � / ` / . � : ~ � . / \ . � � . � . . ; . i ! / � . i NCS Classification Region: Central/Arctic Site Number Site Name Site Descriptor Province Sector S C 00I00 Pon Burwell Small Craft Harbour Ontario Small Craft Harbours Contaminated site Name Status CS Number Sediment-Norttibf"ancreelePiei_ .Assesded-NOActaOekegnlrad 7'� - Y .'_ x' e.,'.. ¢ NCSCS Status Score Variance Cleesiflcetlon Completion tete Comments Not Completed 0 0 Wednesday,February 28,2001 The NCS was not designed specifically for aquatic contaminated sites,and therefore was not completed. 'SedimienE-Northbf'Fast.Steel bock- Under Assessment `604 :fi1. -= NCSCS Statue Score Variance Classification Completion Date Comments Not Completed 0 0 Wednesday,February 28,2001 The NCS was not designed specifically for aquatic contaminated sites,and therefore was not completed. SedimentVicinity of Concrete'Pic'.• :.•.-,UachteAseessatent' .. NCSCS Status Score Variance Classification Completion Date Comments Not Completed 0 0 Wednesday,February 28,2001 The NCS was not designed specifically fat aquatic contaminated sites,and therefore was not completed. .Sediment-Vicinity of East Steel Dock Assessed-No Action Required NCSCS Status Score Variance Classification Completion Date Comments Not Completed 0 0 Wednesday.February 28,2001 The NCS was not designed specifically for aquatic contaminated sites,and therefore was not completed. Sediment•Vicinity of Sewage'Iteatment P Vader Assessment i NCSCS Status Score Variance Classification Completion Date Comments Not Completed 0 0 The NCS was not designed specifically for aquatic contaminated sites,and therefore was not completed. Sediment-Vicinity of Talismen Property Under Assessment 002 NCSCS Status Score Variance Classification Completion Date Comments y-; _ - NCS Classification Not Completed 0 0 Wednesday.February 20.2001 The NCS was not designed specifically for aquatic contaminated slim.and therefore was not completed SasciSoil-Beach Amen} Assessed No ActionRequved t c. NCSCS Status Score Variance Classification Completion Date Comments Not Completed 0 0 Wednesday,February 28,2001 Below COME and Provincial Criteria,therefore not completed. Federal Contaminated Site Inventory Report "l Region: Central/Arctic Site Number Site Name Site Descriptor Province Sector S C 00100 Pat Burwell Small Craft Harbour Ontario Small Craft Harbours Contaminated Slte Name Statue CS Number NCSCS Rating &dlisfltNo,th of East Stgl Dock, Uader':A.dtlimEet - 004 Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Fiscal Year Expenditure(,) 2000-2001 S805 Other(Specify) Fiscal Year Expenditure(:) 2000-2001 5805 2000-2001 3805 2000-2001 3803 2000-2001 3805 Sediment-Vicinity of Comma Linder Assessment 063 • Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Fiscal Year Expenditure(:) 2000-2001 3805 Other(Specify) Fiscal Year Expenditure(s) 2000-2001 5805 2000-2001 5805 2000-2001 5805 _41 • SF �. i�{� aa i.�lE-yd Federal Contaminated Site Inventory Report Petroleum Hydrocarbons and PAHs Fiscal Year Expenditure(e) 2000-2001 5805 Sediment'-Vicinity of.Sewage TieatmeatP Under Assessment 001 - Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Fiscal Year Expenditure(s) 2000-2001 $S05 Other(Specify) Fiscal Year Expenditure(s) 2000-2001 3805 2000-2001 5805 2000-2001 3805 Petroleum Hydrocarbons and PAHs Fiscal Year Expenditure(s) 2000-2001 5805 Sediment:Vicinity of Talismen Property' Under Assessment 002 Contaminant Category Heavy Metals Fiscal Year Expenditure(s) 2000-2001 5805 Other(Specify) Fiscal Year Expenditure(s) 2000-2001 $805 2000-2001 $805 2000-2001 $805 2000-2001 $805 = rl'' � fie* -t r •- • - - -.. _ _ • ,,. .a.. � toc�4 h:�-.��.8=r: 3..t3�n. e, vr�L _. fi ?fi. ` "' ' - • . .,,-f4 1_ .- ... k .� ��- Y4 SOH IOOZ'ODOZ Mair4IPudx3 I'li BHYd Inn suoRmacuPAH wilaranad 1.1odabi AioIuenui oi's pa)eulwejuo.0 ieaape4 r-- • V r r, t r r r r r 7' Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase.1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 APPENDIX H: References 4092-10 March 2001 MaeViro I I I I a I I I I 1L11 ,II #' Small Craft Harbours, Central &Arctic Region Port Burwell SCH Enhanced Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Port Burwell, Ontario—Site No.4766 ger;INAdru" .- :,'I: ati4 A — iuTrae' _tc A' C d-ies-• • Telep'hone` ; I .:- -::- :,- ,,,;.•,..' ..,, ' ....:.:,: -..: '-t-,'`, , .•Nu7 mber" • Archaeological and Robert von Bitter, Toronto, Ontario (416)314-7161 Heritage Planning, Regional Archaeologist Ministry of Citizenship, Culture, and Recreation i (MCzCR) Insurers'Advisory Jodi Wong, Toronto, Ontario (800)268-8080 Organization Inc. Environmental Services Ministry of Natural Dave Richards Elmar, Ontario (519)773-9014 1 Resources (MNR) Ministry of the Dave Thompson London, Ontario (519)873-5020 _Environment(MOE) Ministry of the Fred Ruiter, Toronto, Ontario (416)314-4075 Environment(MOE) Co-ordinator Municipality of Bayham Kyle Kruger Staffordville, Ontario (519)866-5521 Technical Standards and Carol Robyn, Etobicoke, Ontario (416) 325-5054 Safety Authority, Public Information Fuels Safety Division Services Go-ordinator 4092-10 March 2001 MacVi]Co i i i i