HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 11, 2008 - Special Council COUNCIL MINUTES
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM
9344 Plank Road, Straffordville
Thursday September 11,2008
7:00 p.m.
OFFICIAL PLAN 5-YEAR REVIEW SESSION
The Special Meeting of the Council of the Municipality of Bayham was held on
Thursday, September 11, 2008 in the Committee Room. Present were Mayor Lynn Acre,
Councillors Wayne Casier and Ed Ketchabaw, Administrator Kyle Kruger and Deputy
Clerk Margaret Underhill.
Public Attendees: Brent Stewart, Honor Wassing
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Acre called the meeting to order at 7:22 pm.
2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF
None
3. DELEGATIONS
(a) 7:23 pm - Derek Dudek, Municipal Planning Consultant IBI Group,was in attendance to
discuss Items 4(a) and(b) and the Draft Official Plan.
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
(a) IBI Group Memo dated August 18, 2008 "Follow Up to Public Information Session
held July 17/08 re: Official Plan 5 Year Review Boundary Re-organization"
D. Dudek informed Council that there was several land owners in attendance at the July
17th Information Session held in the Municipal Council Chambers. He expanded on the
concept of a trade off of specific urban designated lands and agriculture lands. He added
that there might be consideration of removing lands from the Vienna urban boundary due
to their proximity to services and topography. He noted that the Vienna map is not
changing at this time but could consider this if the Ministry requests it. Overall,the OP
Review removes only 15.5 hectares of land in the agriculture designation.
D. Dudek continued by saying that the requests submitted by Mr. Graydon and Mr. &
Mrs. Reimer to change land to Estate Residential is difficult to justify to the Ministry. He
Special Council Meeting Minutes -223 - September 11, 2008
stated that his opinion is unchanged in that these lands are not restricted from being used
for agricultural purposes and should remain for such purposes.
D. Dudek expressed support for the southerly expansion of the Bayham Industrial Park
south of Hwy 3 to match the proposed Town of Tillsonburg designation changes. When
asked about locating new industrial land next to a Natural Heritage designation, D. Dudek
referred to the Draft OP page 3-15 for a specific policy for lands next to ANSIs (areas of
natural and scientific interest)requiring an Environmental Impact Study (EIS).
(b) IBI Group Memo dated August 25, 2008 re: Rural vs. Prime Agricultural land
designations in the Municipality of Bayham
D. Dudek reported that the province still considers tobacco lands as "specialty crop
soils". Referring to Paragraph 2) of his memo dated August 25, 2008, he went on to
briefly explain that by re-designating a portion of Bayham as "rural", the municipality
could provide for additional uses consistent with the PPS including resource
management, i.e. forestry, sand/gravel; resource-based recreational activities, i.e. hiking,
biking, skiing trails; and limited residential development.
D. Dudek continued on with Paragraph 3) by stating that in order to pursue a"rural" land
use designation, we must first establish that a portion of the Municipality is not a"prime
agricultural area". Councillor Casier asked if the Class 4-7 soils, which are considered to
be unusable lands, could be used for residential. D. Dudek responded by saying that site-
specific consideration of the lands would have to be justified by the owner that it's not
prime agricultural lands. He added that there might be consideration for limited
residential development on lands based on the justification of soil types. He explained
that it would be necessary to put in clear policies that may permit residential on
agricultural lands and place the onus on the owner to justify the proposed lot.
Mayor Acre asked as to whether or not we could pursue this when the County Official
Plan is adopted. K. Kruger responded by saying that it would be best to pursue it now
with the Ministry or we would have to amend it ourselves with the County Plan when in
place,which most likely would not be for a couple of years.
Councillor Ketchabaw asked as to what Oxford County has for policies for residential in
agricultural lands. D. Dudek responded by saying that he likes the Oxford County policy
as it maintains the same goal. He added that the policy looks at woodlots on Class 4-7
soils and keeping away from agricultural and livestock uses.
Consensus of Council was to include the policies similar to Oxford County regarding
residential use in agricultural lands and to include all "rural"uses in the policies.
(c) DRAFT Official Plan of the Municipality of Bayham—5-year Review
Special Council Meeting Minutes - 224 - September 11, 2008
D. Dudek briefly explained that the restructured Official Plan reads easier and for ease of
understanding the draft the proposed changes are highlighted in blue. He explained that
the goal is to start circulating the draft to agencies and the Ministry as soon as possible
and to post the Notice for Open House right away. He added that after the Open House
any required changes will be made and the Public Meeting will be scheduled.
Councillor Ketchabaw referring to Section 2.1.7 Farm Consolidation and Surplus Farm
Dwellings and paragraph 2.1.7.2 c)asked why the policy is there for only one per
parcel. K. Kruger responded by saying that paragraph 2.1.7.2 c) was put in place prior to
the A2 zoning,which prohibits new residential development. D. Dudek stated he would
review the policy for redundancy now that we have the A2 Zone. Councillor Ketchabaw
stated that the old houses on farms that could be severed and used is better for the
municipality as a residential lot than having them rented out by farmers who really are
not interested in being landlords.
Councillor Casier referring to Section 2.1.10 Supplementary Farm Dwellings asked about
the policies of surrounding municipalities. D. Dudek responded by saying he reviewed
Oxford and Norfolk's policies and understood that Council was looking for a more
permanent policy in dealing with this issue. He went on to explain that through a minor
variance to the Committee of Adjustment a farmer would have to satisfy specific criteria:
need, existing dwellings, location, size and type, services and vehicular access.
Councillor Ketchabaw asked if this policy would apply to all farm sizes to which D.
Dudek responded in saying that the "need"criteria would have to satisfied but did
suggest that clearer wording in the "need" section would be warranted. Councillor Casier
suggested that a farmer be required to show a farm registration number to justify the need
for more seasonal help and that this number be required on the anniversary date of the
minor variance approval. Referring to Section 2.1.10.2, Councillor Ketchabaw supported
the agreement including "removal" clauses to control the supplementary dwellings. He
also asked if the policies would apply to all farm sizes to which D. Dudek responded by
saying that the intent is to apply the criteria to all farm sizes. K. Kruger confirmed that
the agreement can cover a time period where it has to be revisited with follow-up,
enforcement and inspection. M. Underhill confirmed that the cost of the Minor Variance
is $2000 at time of application, being $1000 minimum with a$1000 deposit. D. Dudek
confirmed that the properties currently with temporary zoning in place for supplementary
farm dwellings will have to go through a minor variance application prior to expiry of
their temporary zoning. He also confirmed that changes will have to be made to the
Zoning by-law removing policies for supplementary farm dwellings.
D. Dudek continued in the draft pointing out that Section 3 Rural Area Policies would be
expanded to include the previously discussed rural policies and in Section 3.3.1.i) acreage
for Highway Meadows will change in the future as the owner is seeking to expand the
park with the Ministry.
Continuing on with Section 4 Settlement Area Policies, D. Dudek pointed out that
policies regarding residential intensification within settlement area for low density
Special Council Meeting Minutes -225 - September 11, 2008
development would be added. D. Dudek added that in Section 4.4.1.4 a clause was added
requiring development in Eden to connect to the existing municipal sewage system. He
explained that the servicing is required in Port Burwell, Vienna and Straffordville and
that Eden would be required as well. He acknowledged that there might be urban areas
that cannot connect due to topography and financial issues. K. Kruger added that for a
developer just to say that it is not feasible is not justification and to say that it is only
financially inhibitive is not enough justification. K. Kruger stated that the sewers were
put in to resolve problems with small lots and water quality. D. Dudek spoke of
developers proposing major growth should be required to connect to the services as the
infrastructure was put in for that purpose. He suggested tightening up the wording of
Section 4.4.1.4 and the new Section 5 to acknowledge that there are areas that justifiably
cannot be serviced.
In Section 4.7.3, D. Dudek noted that the Special Policy Area No. 3 - Chateau
Wyndemere lands would have the predesignation in the OP but that this does not
preclude them from fulfilling the Ministries' requirements. Also, Section 4.7.4, Special
Policy Area No. 4—New England proposed lands have been added for the purpose of
permitting lots on an infilling basis.
The discussion moved on to Section 5.3.3 - Large-Scale Wind Energy Systems and the
proposed removal of the boundary limitation. K. Kruger noted that in 2001 the boundary
was a safeguard to restrict wind farms to the south of Calton Line. He added that if
the current wind farm policies are suitable then this limitation could be removed. Mayor
Acre stated that she wished to think about this and consider it at a later time.
D. Dudek pointed out the new Section 5.3.4—Large-Scale Renewable and alternative
Energy systems has been developed in the Township of Malahide and formulated similar
and are already Ministry approved. He noted that it could be determined later as to how
the municipality would deal with private turbines in residential areas. Councillor
Ketchabaw questioned Section 5.3.2 paragraph c) and if this considers industrial on prime
agricultural lands. D. Dudek stated that is geared to solar farms that can take up a large
amounts of land and that this section looks at renewable energy systems and how it can
benefit the population.
D. Dudek continued on by requesting Council to review the section on goals and pass
along any changes that they may wish to this section. He pointed out that Section 8
includes updated notification rules and requirements. He outlined the changes to
Schedule "A"and added that there are no changes to Port Burwell, Vienna, Straffordville
and Eden urban boundaries. He indicated the changes to the urban boundaries of Calton,
Richmond,North Hall and Corinth.
There was consensus of Council that after D. Dudek has incorporated the "rural"policy
changes; reworded the servicing policies and made the text/mapping corrections as
discussed that circulation of the draft OP proceed and that staff determine the date of the
Open House.
Special Council Meeting Minutes -226 - September 11, 2008
5. ADJOURNMENT
2008-457 Moved by W Casier
Seconded by E Ketchabaw
"THAT the Council meeting be adjourned at 8:46 p.m."
Disposition: Motion Carried
/ -&) °/M.1L-
MAYO DEP TY CLERK
x 1t) ac>a�?
Date Approved