HomeMy WebLinkAboutAsset Management Plan 2020`
Page | 1
2020| Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan
`
Page | 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 - Overview ............................................................................................................. 3
Section 2 - Legislative Overview ........................................................................................ 3
Section 3 - Strategic Asset Management Policy ................................................................. 4
Section 4 - Roles & Responsibilities ................................................................................... 6
Section 5 - Asset Management Plan Development ............................................................ 7
Section 6 - Data & Methodology ........................................................................................ 8
Section 7 - Growth Projections ........................................................................................... 9
Section 8 - Climate Chnage ............................................................................................... 9
Section 9 - Risks .............................................................................................................. 11
Section 10 - Review & Monitoring Process ...................................................................... 11
Section 11 - Communication of the Asset Management Plan ........................................... 11
Section 12 - State of the Infrastructure & Levels of Service.............................................. 11
• Section 12 - Bridges & Culverts ............................................................................ 13
• Section 12 - Facilities ........................................................................................... 17
• Section 12 - Land Improvements .......................................................................... 21
• Section 12 - Machinery & Equipment ................................................................... 25
• Section 12 - Road Network ................................................................................... 29
• Section 12 - Stormwater Infrastructure ................................................................. 33
• Section 12 - Vehicles ............................................................................................ 37
• Section 12 - Water Infrastructure .......................................................................... 40
• Section 12 - Wastewater Infrastructure................................................................. 44
Section 10 - Review & Monitoring Process ................................................................................ 11
Section 10 - Review & Monitoring Process ................................................................................ 11
`
Page | 3
Section 1 – Overview
The main objective of an Asset Management Plan is to use the Municipality’s best available
information to develop a comprehensive long-term plan for capital assets. In addition, the Asset
Management Plan should provide a sufficiently documented framework that will enable
continuous improvement and updates of the Asset Management Plan, to ensure its relevancy
over the long term.
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan is intended to be a tool for Council and
staff to use during various decision-making processes, including the annual budgeting process
and future capital grant application processes. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management
Plan will serve as a road map for sustainable infrastructure planning.
The following assets are included in the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan:
• Bridges & Culverts
• Facilities
• Land Improvements
• Machinery & Equipment
• Road Network
• Stormwater Infrastructure
• Vehicles
• Water Infrastructure
• Wastewater Infrastructure
Section 2 – Legislative Overview
Asset management planning in Ontario has evolved significantly over the past decade. Before
2009, capital assets were recorded by municipalities as expenditures in the year of acquisition
or construction. The long-term issue with this approach was the lack of a capital asset inventory,
both in the Municipality’s accounting system and financial statements. As a result of revisions to
Section 3150 of the Public Sector Accounting Board Handbook, effective for the 2009 fiscal
year, municipalities were required to capitalize tangible capital assets, thus creating an
inventory of assets.
In 2012, the province launched the Municipal Infrastructure Strategy. As part of that initiative,
municipalities and local service boards seeking provincial funding were required to demonstrate
how any proposed project fits within a detailed Asset Management Plan. In addition, Asset
Management Plans encompassing all municipal assets needed to be prepared by the end of
2016 to meet Federal Gas Tax requirements. To assist in defining the components of an Asset
Management Plan, the Province produced a document entitled Building Together: Guide for
Municipal Asset Management Plans. This guide documented the components, information, and
analysis that were required to be included in municipal Asset Management Plans under this
initiative.
The Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015 was proclaimed on May 1, 2016. This
legislation detailed principles for evidence-based and sustainable long-term infrastructure
planning. The Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015 also gave the Province the
authority to guide municipal asset management planning by way of regulation. In late 2017, the
Province introduced Ontario Regulation 588/17 under the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity
Act, 2015. The intent of Ontario Regulation 588/17 is to establish a standard format for
municipal Asset Management Plans. Specifically, the regulations require that Asset
Management Plans be developed that define the current and proposed levels of service, identify
`
Page | 4
the lifecycle activities that would be undertaken to achieve these levels of service, and provide a
financial strategy to support the levels of service and lifecycle activities.
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan has been developed to address the
requirements of Ontario Regulation 588/17.
Section 3 - Strategic Asset Management Policy
A Strategic Asset Management Policy details the policies and strategies that together form a
framework for the Municipality’s asset management process. This framework is intended to
enable the Municipality to make consistent and sound decisions, plan for future needs, and
provide public confidence with respect to the management of municipal infrastructure.
The Municipality’s goals and objectives with respect to its tangible assets relate to the effective
delivery of municipal services to constituents and stakeholders. The Municipality aims to
provide services at expected service levels, as defined within the Municipality’s Asset
Management Plan. Further, the Municipality’s assets should be maintained at condition levels
that are aligned with the expected service levels, strategic intent and financial sustainability.
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan is one component of the
Municipality’s overarching corporate strategy. It was developed to support the Municipality's
vision for its asset management practice and programs. It provides key asset attribute data,
including current composition of the Municipality's infrastructure portfolio, inventory,
replacement costs, useful life etc., summarizes the physical health of the capital assets,
enumerates the Municipality's current capital spending framework, and outlines financial
strategies to achieve fiscal sustainability in the long-term while reducing and eventually
eliminating funding gaps (infrastructure deficit).
`
Page | 5
The Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015 sets out principles to guide asset
management planning in municipalities in Ontario. The Municipality of Bayham will
commit to the following principles when making decisions in respect of its assets and
asset management planning.
• Fiscal Responsibility: The Municipality will utilize an evidence-based approach to
decision-making that balances service levels, risks, costs and aims at maximizing value
from assets and services. Asset management will be rigorously applied in the
Municipality of Bayham assessing assets in their systems context and again for net
value.
• Holistic: The Municipality will take a holistic approach to asset management that takes
into consideration all aspects and stages of the asset lifecycle and the interrelationships
between them. This will encourage principled, evidence based and strategic long term
infrastructure planning decisions considering among other things; demographic and
economic trends, productivity and economic competitiveness, accessibility, health and
safety, environmental impacts, support of public policy goals and providing a foundation
for future infrastructure investment.
• Innovation: The Municipality will continue to be progressive with the use of technology
for asset management purposes. Further, the Municipality will continue to monitor
industry best practices and innovation opportunities to make use of innovative
technologies, services and practices.
• Public Engagement: The Municipality will provide opportunities for residents
and other interested parties to provide input to asset management planning
through the annual Budget Consultations process. Further, subject to any
prohibition under any legislation or otherwise by law on the collection, use, or
disclosure of information, the Municipality will make decisions with respect to
infrastructure based on information that is publicly available or made available to
the public through the municipal website.
`
Page | 6
• Service Delivery: Service levels and performance targets shall be established
and form the basis for asset management strategic decision making with respect
to infrastructure. Levels of service will be defined, at a minimum, in accordance
with the qualitative descriptions and technical metrics required by Ontario
Regulation 588/17.
• Sustainability: The Municipality will incorporate potential vulnerabilities that may
be caused by climate change and other risks. The Municipality will endeavour to
seek the most sustainable compromise between conflicting objectives.
Furthermore, the Municipality will consider mitigation approaches to climate
change, and disaster planning and contingency funding as part of its asset
management planning practice.
• Strategic Alignment: Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan implementation
actions will be identified, aligned and implemented each year via the annual operating
budget and updates to the ten-year capital plan. The actions will be informed by the
annual budget consultation and municipal studies, plans and policies, including but not
limited to the:
o Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Financial Plan
o Municipality of Bayham Roads Needs Study
o Municipality of Bayham Bridge & Culvert Study
o Municipality of Bayham Facility Audit
o Municipality of Bayham Storm Sewer Assessment
o Municipality of Bayham Economic Development Opportunities & Initiatives Plan
o Municipality of Bayham Official Plan
o Municipality of Bayham Energy Plan & Local Action Plan of Green House Gas
o Municipality of Bayham Strategic Plan
o Municipality of Bayham Accessibility Plan
Section 4 - Roles & Responsibilities
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan will be informed by the following
contributors:
Stakeholder
Group
Responsibilities
Council • Approve the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan.
• Receive annual reporting on the status and performance of the
Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan.
• Review and approve funding associated with asset
management through the annual budget process.
• Provide opportunities for the public to provide input into asset
management planning through the annual Budget
Consultations.
`
Page | 7
Staff • Identify resources required for implementation of the Municipality
of Bayham Asset Management Plan.
• Coordinate annual review and reporting on the status and
performance of the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management
Plan.
• Incorporate lifecycle costing and levels of service considerations
when evaluating competing asset investment needs and
developing asset management strategies.
• The CAO|Clerk will function as the Asset Management Plan
Executive Lead with support from the senior management team.
Residents,
Constituents and
Stakeholders
• Provide input, in an advisory manner, to the Municipality
through participation in the annual Budget Consultations
process.
• Provide input, in an advisory manner, on expectations
with respect to levels of service.
Section 5 - Asset Management Plan Development
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan was developed utilizing the Municipality’s
asset management principles as identified within Section 3 – Strategic Asset Management
Policy, capital asset database information, and Laserfiche data. Specifically, the Municipality of
Bayham Asset Management Plan development is based on the steps summarized below:
1. Compile available information pertaining to the Municipality’s capital assets to be
included in the plan, including attributes such as size/material type, useful life, age,
accounting valuation and current valuation. Update current valuation, where required,
using benchmark costing data or applicable inflationary indices.
2. Define and assess current asset conditions, based on a combination of staff input,
existing asset reports, and an asset age-based condition analysis.
3. Define and document current levels of service based on funding levels and consideration
of various background reports.
4. Develop a lifecycle management strategy that provides the activities required to sustain
the levels of service. The strategy summarizes these activities in the forecast of annual
capital and operating expenditures, reflected in the Capital and Operating Budgets,
required to achieve these level of service outcomes.
5. Develop a financing strategy to support the lifecycle management strategy. The
financing plan informs how the capital and operating expenses arising from the asset
management strategy will be funded over the forecast period.
6. Document the comprehensive Asset Management Plan in a formal report to inform
future decision-making and to communicate planning to municipal stakeholders.
`
Page | 8
Section 6 - Data & Methodology
The Municipality's dataset for the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan includes
key asset attributes and Section 3150 of the Public Sector Accounting Board Handbook data,
such as historical costs, in-service dates, field inspection data, asset health, and
replacement costs.
A critical aspect of the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan is the level of
confidence the Municipality has in the data used to develop the state of the infrastructure
and form the appropriate financial strategies. Through monitoring, evaluation and
assessment the Municipality has a high degree of confidence in the accuracy, validity and
completeness of the asset data for all categories analyzed in the Municipality of Bayham
Asset Management Plan.
CONDITION DATA
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. In general, this approach may not be reflective of an asset's actual condition and
the true nature of its deterioration, which tends to accelerate toward the end of the asset's
lifecycle. However, it is a useful approximation in the absence of standardized decay
models and actual field condition data and can provide a benchmark for future
requirements. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan also utilizes actual field
condition data which provides a more meaningful and representative presentation of the
Municipality's state of infrastructure. The Municipality evaluates each asset individually prior
to aggregation and reporting; therefore, many imprecisions that may be highlighted at the
individual asset level are attenuated at the class level.
FINANCIAL DATA
In the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan, the average annual requirement is
the amount, based on current replacement costs that the Municipality should set aside
annually for each infrastructure class so that assets can be replaced upon reaching the end
of their lifecycle.
To determine current funding capacity, all existing sources of funding are identified and
combined to enumerate the total available funding. These figures are then assessed against the
average annual requirements, and are used to calculate the annual funding shortfall (surplus)
and for forming the financial strategies.
Only predictable sources of funding are used, e.g., tax and rate revenues, user fees, and
other streams of income the Municipality can rely on with a high degree of certainty.
Government grants and other ad-hoc injections of capital are not included in the
Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan given their unpredictability. As senior
governments make greater, more predictable and permanent commitments to funding
municipal infrastructure programs, e.g., the Federal Gas Tax Fund, future iterations of this
asset management plan will account for such funding sources.
In addition to the annual shortfall, the Municipality of Bayham faces a significant
infrastructure backlog. The infrastructure backlog is the accrued financial investment
needed in the short-term to bring the assets to a state of good repair.
`
Page | 9
The Municipality of Bayham utilizes a capitalization threshold as follows:
• $5,000 and meets one of the following criteria;
o the replacement or overhaul of an asset or major component that extends the
useful life of the asset;
o the expenditure results in an increase in the service quality of the asset;
o the expenditure results in an increase in the capacity of the asset;
o the efficiency of the asset is increased or associated operating costs are lowered.
LIMITATIONS & ASSUMPTIONS
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan includes the following limitations and
assumptions:
• As available, the Municipality utilizes field condition assessment data to illustrate the
state of infrastructure and develop the requisite financial strategies. However, in the
absence of observed data, the Municipality relies on the age of assets to estimate their
physical condition.
• The use of inflation measures, for example using CPI/NRBCPI to inflate historical costs
in the absence of actual replacement costs. While a reasonable approximation, the use
of such multipliers may not be reflective of market prices and may over or understate the
value of the Municipality's infrastructure portfolio and the resulting capital requirements.
Section 7 - Growth Projections
The Municipality of Bayham occupies 248 km2 on the north shore of Lake Erie at the eastern
end of Elgin County. The Municipality came into existence in 1998 as an amalgamation of the
three separate municipalities formerly known as the Township of Bayham, the Village of Port
Burwell, and the Village of Vienna. The population of the municipality in 2006 was 6,727
according to Statistics Canada. The projected population for the Municipality by the year 2027 is
9,196 based on extrapolation of recent growth rates. Population growth and population density
increases will place additional demand on operations and maintenance to maintain current
levels of service.
Section 8 - Climate Change
The impacts of climate change can have a significant impact on the assets the Municipality
manages and the services they provide. In the context of the Asset Management Planning
process, climate change can be considered as both a future demand and a risk.
How climate change will impact on assets can vary significantly depending on the location and
the type of services provided, as will the way in which the Municipality responds and manages
those impacts.
As a minimum the Municipality should consider both how to manage existing assets given the
potential climate change impacts, and then also how to create resilience to climate change in
any new works or acquisitions as demonstrated below:
`
Page | 10
Climate Change
Climate Change
Description
Potential Impact on
Assets & Services Management
Precipitation Structures and assets
may be overwhelmed
with volume and/or
intensity of volume
Effective and routine preventative
maintenance to ensure structures
drain and/or foreign materials do
not block or undermine structures.
Future structures to be enhanced
to address climate change
Erosion Structure foundations,
sizes and drainage may
be filled or undermined
through erosion
Effective and routine preventative
maintenance to ensure structures
drain and/or foreign materials do
not block or undermine structures.
Future structures to be enhanced
to address climate change
Wind Speed Dynamic loads on
structures and load
models need to be
modified to ensure
structure sustainability
Effective and routine inspections to
ensure structure sustainability.
Future structures to be enhanced
to address climate change
Section 9 - Risks
The purpose of infrastructure risk management is to document the findings and
recommendations resulting from the periodic identification, assessment and treatment of risks
associated with providing services from infrastructure.
An assessment of risks associated with service delivery will identify risks that will result in loss
or reduction in service, personal injury, environmental impacts, a ‘financial shock’, reputational
impacts, or other consequences. The risk assessment process identifies credible risks, the
likelihood of the risk event occurring, and the consequences should the event occur. The risk
management process used is shown below:
`
Page | 11
Beyond Climate Change, critical risks to the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan
are outlined as below:
Risk Indicator Outcome Risk Rating Risk Treatment Plan Residual Risk
Lack of
Information
Under investment in
infrastructure
creating unsafe
and/or unreliable
infrastructure
Very High Fund and continue
annual infrastructure
inspections and
assessments
Low
Lack of Funding Under investment in
infrastructure
creating unsafe
and/or unreliable
infrastructure
Very High Fund and continue
annual infrastructure
inspections and
assessments
Low
Section 10 - Review & Monitoring Process
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan is a living document. In this context, the
Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan will be updated annually. Further, as the
strategic priorities and capital needs of the Municipality change the Municipality will consider
potential impacts on the Asset Management Plan to ensure continued alignment. When
updating the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan, it should be noted that the state
of local infrastructure, proposed levels of service, lifecycle management strategy and financing
strategy are integrated and impact each other.
The July 1 annual review will include:
• the Municipality’s progress in implementing the asset management plan;
• any factors impeding the Municipality’s ability to implement the asset management plan;
and
• a strategy to address the factors described in the above noted factors.
Section 11 - Communication of the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan
The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan will be made available in the following
locations:
• The Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham
56269 Heritage Line
Straffordville ON
N0J 1Y0
• Municipality of Bayham website: www.bayham.on.ca
`
Page | 12
Section 12 – State of the Infrastructure & Levels of Service
The Municipality of Bayham owns a sizeable portfolio of assets, which vary significantly in terms
of their function, attributes, age, durability and condition. This section of the Municipality of
Bayham Asset Management Plan aggregates technical and financial data across all asset
classes.
SUMMARY STATISTICS
Municipality of Bayham assets analyzed in this asset management plan have a total 2020
replacement valuation of $136,867,921 (levy supported) and $39,124,191 (user fee supported)
for a combined total valuation of 175,992,112.
Asset Attributes - Replacement Profile
Asset Type 2020 Replacement Cost
Bridges & Culverts $13,819,833
Facilities $19,258,263
Land Improvements $6,053,186
Machinery & Equipment $1,103,283
Roads - Asphalt $7,177,782
Roads - Base $22,008,483
Roads - Tar & Chip $4,409,625
Roads - Gravel $1,834,940
Roads - Guardrail $98,509
Roads - Sidewalks $8,469,438
Roads - Streetlights $549,541
Stormwater Infrastructure $45,446,811
Vehicles $6,638,227
Sub-Total $136,867,921
Water Infrastructure $10,947,931
Wastewater Infrastructure $28,176,260
Total $175,992,112
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. In general, this approach may not be reflective of an asset's actual condition and
the true nature of its deterioration, which tends to accelerate toward the end of the asset's
lifecycle. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan also incorporates actual
field condition data which provides a more meaningful and representative presentation of
the Municipality's state of infrastructure. The table below shows the distribution of levy
supported assets based on the assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
`
Page | 13
LEVEL OF SERVICE
The two primary risks to a municipality's financial sustainability are the total lifecycle costs of
infrastructure, and establishing levels of service that exceed its financial capacity. In this regard,
municipalities face a choice: overpromise and under deliver; under promise and over deliver; or
promise only that which can be delivered efficiently without placing inequitable burden on
ratepayers. In general, there is often a trade-off between political expedience and judicious,
long-term fiscal stewardship.
Developing realistic levels of service using meaningful key performance indicators can be
instrumental in managing expectations, identifying areas requiring higher investments, driving
organizational performance and securing the highest value for money from public assets.
Ontario Regulation 588/17 and Section 3 – Strategic Asset Management sets out principles to
guide level of service standards and associated key performance indicators. Beyond meeting
regulatory requirements, levels of service established support the intended purpose of the asset
and its anticipated impact on the community and the Municipality. Each of the following asset
class subsections include a qualitative description and a key performance indicator.
The Municipality annually collects data on its key performance indicators and monitors the data
to establish compliance with established levels of service or deviations from the same.
BRIDGES & CULVERTS
The Municipality of Bayham bridge and culvert infrastructure consists of seven (7) bridges and
ten (10) culverts. Appendix ‘A’ – Bridge & Culvert Map illustrates bridge and culvert network
locations. The table below further defines the Municipality of Bayham Bridge & Culvert
network attributes.
`
Page | 14
Bridge & Culvert – Asset Attributes
Asset
Type
Quantity Average
Age
(Years)
Useful
Life
(Years)
Bridge 7 43 50
Culvert 10 29 50
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan also incorporates actual field
condition data which provides a more meaningful and representative presentation of the
Municipality's state of infrastructure. For bridge and culvert infrastructure the Municipality
utilizes an Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) Report. The OSIM Report defines a
detailed element by element visual inspection of each bridge and/or culvert identifying physical
geometrics, structure condition, deficiencies, required additional investigations, and
recommended rehabilitation/replacement works and associated estimated costs. This data
along with historical information and photos is subsequently entered into an electronic
inspection form.
The Municipality supplements OSIM Report data utilizing Laserfiche Service Request Forms,
Maintenance Tracking Forms and Work Order Forms to track additional resource inputs to each
asset segment. The table below shows the distribution of assets based on the assessed
condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the bridge and culvert average asset condition classification trend over
time.
`
Page | 15
Bridge & Culvert Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Bridges &
Culverts
Poor Poor Poor Fair Fair Fair Fair
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The bridge and culvert lifecycle replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is estimated as
$1,280,521 or $128,052 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $729,416 or $72,942 on average per year.
This is 56.96% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle cost.
The anticipated budget for bridge and culverts leaves a shortfall of $55,111 average per year of
the forecast lifecycle costs required to provide services. The forecast lifecycle replacement
costs necessary to provide bridge and culvert infrastructure include:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services.
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition. Maintenance activities enable an asset to provide service
for its planned life:
o patching
o structure repairs
o brushing
o flushing
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o rehabilitation
o deck reconstruction
o culvert lining
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset operation.
Budget/Year $0
Maintenance At the current level of service maintenance activities can be completed
within the current planned budget.
Budget/Year $10,052
`
Page | 16
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities funding leaves a
shortfall of $55,111 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $62,889
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
Bridge & Culvert Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Bridge and Culvert assets have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under
Ontario Regulation 588/17. These requirements include levels of service reporting from two
different levels, i.e. community levels of service and technical levels of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of bridges and culverts. Technical levels of
service describe the scope and quality of bridges and culverts through performance measures
that can be quantified, evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides services.
The table below presents the current levels of service as mandated by Ontario Regulation
588/17.
`
Page | 17
Level of Service – Bridge & Culverts
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description of the traffic that is
supported by municipal bridges.
The road system, inclusive of bridge and culverts,
serving the Municipality of Bayham is comprised of a
Provincial Highway, County Roads and Municipal Roads.
Municipal Roads ranging from Class 3 – Class 6 are
local roads which are intended to provide access to
abutting properties, to serve destination as opposed to
through traffic, and to act as feeders to the County and
Provincial arterial road system. The Municipal Road
system supports all modes of transportation.
Description or images of the
condition of bridges and
culverts and how this would
affect use of the bridges.
Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham Bridge &
Culvert OSIM Inspection Report for images of all bridges
and culverts. The current level of service does not
negatively impact the use of the structures in the
immediate timeframe.
Technical Levels of Service
Year 2018 2019
Percentage of bridges in the
municipality with loading or
dimensional restrictions.
0% 14%
For bridges in the
municipality, the average
bridge condition index value.
42 48
Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Bridge Service Request
Forms/Work Orders
4 2
Operating Budget Variance ($5,746) ($9,142)
FACILITIES
The Municipality of Bayham tax levy supported Facilities infrastructure consists of eight (8)
facilities. Appendix ‘B’ – Facility Map illustrates facility locations. The table below further
defines the Municipality of Facility attributes.
Facilities – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Asset
Component
Quantity Average Age
(Years)
Useful Life
(Years)
Facilities
HVAC 8 17 20
Interior 10 13 35
Roof 10 17 15
Services 10 15 30
Shell 10 21 55
Substructure 10 33 95
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan also incorporates actual field
condition data which provides a more meaningful and representative presentation of the
Municipality's state of infrastructure. For Facilities the Municipality utilizes Facility Audits.
`
Page | 18
The Facility Audit defines a detailed element by element visual, non-intrusive inspection of
each asset component, and recommended rehabilitation/replacement works and associated
estimated costs.
The Municipality supplements Facility Audit data utilizing Laserfiche Service Request Forms,
Maintenance Tracking Forms and Work Order Forms to track additional resources inputs to
each asset segment. The table below shows the distribution of assets based on the assessed
condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the Facilities average asset condition classification trend over time.
Facilities Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Facilities Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair Fair
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The facilities lifecycle replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is estimated as
$3,381,440 or $338,144 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $3,338,378 or $333,838 on average per
year. This is 98.73% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle
cost.
`
Page | 19
The anticipated budget for facilities leaves a shortfall of $4,306 average per year of the forecast
lifecycle costs required to provide services. The forecast lifecycle replacement costs necessary
to provide facilities infrastructure include:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services:
o utilities
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition:
o building maintenance
o service contracts
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o rehabilitation
o reconstruction
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service operational activities can be completed
within the current planned budget.
Budget/Year $143,716
Maintenance At the current level of service maintenance activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $64,343
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities funding leaves a
shortfall of $4,306 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $125,779
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
`
Page | 20
Facilities Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Facilities assets do not have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under Ontario
Regulation 588/17. Instead, the Municipality is required to establish levels of service reporting
from two different levels, i.e. community levels of service and technical levels of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of Facilities. Technical levels of service describe
the scope and quality of Facilities through performance measures that can be quantified,
evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides services. The table below
presents the current levels of service as required by Ontario Regulation 588/17.
`
Page | 21
Level of Service – Facilities
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description, which may include
maps, of the Facilities in the
municipality.
Please refer to Appendix ‘B’ – Facility Map
Technical Levels of Service
Year 2018 2019
Facility GHG Emissions (Kg) 125,422 136,198
Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Facility Energy Intensity
(ekWh/sqft)
218.44 222.39
LAND IMPROVEMENTS
The Municipality of Bayham Land Improvements infrastructure consists of twenty (20) Asset
Categories. Appendix ‘C’ – Land Improvements Map illustrates Land Improvement locations.
The table below further defines the Municipality of Bayham Land Improvements
attributes.
Land Improvements – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Asset
Categories
Quantity Average Age
(Years)
Useful Life
(Years)
Land
Improvements
Ball Diamonds 4 4 20
Basketball
Courts
4 1 20
Benches 23 7 20
Bleachers 6 1 20
Concrete Pads 2 4 20
Digital Sign 1 1 20
Fencing 6 3 20
Flag Poles 7 1 20
Lighting 2 33 20
Parking Lots 10 10 20
Pavilions 5 10 20
Picnic Tables 136 8 20
Pier 1 7 50
Playground
Equipment
7 9 20
Recycling
Amenities
37 1 20
Skatepark 1 10 20
Soccer Nets 3 11 20
Stairs 1 10 20
Tennis Court 1 33 20
Well 1 10 20
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan also incorporates actual field
condition data which provides a more meaningful and representative presentation of the
`
Page | 22
Municipality's state of infrastructure. For Land Improvements the Municipality utilizes
Insurance Audits. The Insurance Audit defines a detailed element by element visual, non-
intrusive inspection of each asset component, and recommended rehabilitation/replacement
works and associated estimated costs.
The Municipality supplements Insurance Audit data utilizing Laserfiche Service Request Forms,
Maintenance Tracking Forms, Playground Inspection Forms and Work Order Forms to track
additional resources inputs to each asset segment. The table below shows the distribution of
assets based on the assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the Land Improvements average asset condition classification trend over
time.
Land Improvements Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Land
Improvements
Poor Poor Poor Fair Good Good Fair
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The land improvements lifecycle replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is estimated as
$1,865,508 or $186,551 on average per year.
`
Page | 23
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $1,624,435 or $162,443 on average per
year. This is 87.08% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle
cost.
The anticipated budget for land improvements leaves a shortfall of $24,108 average per year of
the forecast lifecycle costs required to provide services. The forecast lifecycle replacement
costs necessary to provide land improvements infrastructure include:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services:
o grounds maintenance
o beautification
o beach maintenance
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition.
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o rehabilitation
o replacement
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service operational activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $99,554
Maintenance At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset maintenance.
Budget/Year $0
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities funding leaves a
shortfall of $24,108 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $62,889
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
`
Page | 24
Land Improvements Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Land Improvement assets do not have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under
Ontario Regulation 588/17. Instead, the Municipality is required to establish levels of service
reporting from two different levels, i.e. community levels of service and technical levels of
service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of Land Improvements. Technical levels of
service describe the scope and quality of Land Improvements through performance measures
that can be quantified, evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides services.
The table below presents the current levels of service as required by Ontario Regulation 588/17.
`
Page | 25
Level of Service – Land Improvements
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description of Land
Improvements
Please refer to Appendix ‘C’ – Land Improvements Map
Technical Levels of Service
Year 2018 2019
Percentage of Land
Improvements with use
restrictions
5% 0%
Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Land Improvements Work Orders 17 11
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
The Municipality of Bayham Machinery & Equipment assets consists of 6 classifications of
assets from the following departments:
• General Government
• Fire Department
• Public Works Department
• Recreation & Culture
The table below further defines the Municipality of Bayham Machinery & Equipment
attributes.
Machinery & Equipment – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Asset
Categories
Quantity Average Age
(Years)
Useful Life
(Years)
Machinery &
Equipment
General
Government
27 3 5
Fire Department 42 6 10
General
Government
3 3 10
Public Works 4 8 10
Fire Department 30 9 15
Public Works 5 17 15
Fire Department 115 8 20
Public Works 19 7 20
Recreation &
Culture
3 10 20
Fire Department 4 9 25
Public Works
Department
1 14 25
Public Works 1 31 30
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan also incorporates actual field
condition data which provides a more meaningful and representative presentation of the
`
Page | 26
Municipality's state of infrastructure. For Machinery & Equipment the Municipality utilizes
Laserfiche Service Request Forms, Maintenance Tracking Forms and Work Order Forms to
track additional resources inputs to each asset. The table below shows the distribution of assets
based on the assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the machinery and equipment average asset condition classification
trend over time.
Machinery & Equipment Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Machinery &
Equipment
Poor Poor Poor Poor Good Fair Fair
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The machinery and equipment lifecycle replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is
estimated as $1,306,277 or $130,628 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $1,348,172 or $134,817 on average per
year. This is 103.21% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle
cost.
`
Page | 27
The anticipated budget for machinery and equipment leaves a surplus of $4,189 average per
year of the forecast lifecycle costs required to provide services. The forecast lifecycle
replacement costs necessary to provide machinery & equipment infrastructure include:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services.
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition. Maintenance activities enable an asset to provide service
for its planned life:
o equipment maintenance
o equipment service
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o replacement
o rebuild
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset operation.
Budget/Year $0
Maintenance At the current level of service maintenance activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $71,928
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities funding leaves a surplus
of $4,189 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs required to
provide services.
Budget/Year $62,889
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
`
Page | 28
Machinery & Equipment Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Machinery & Equipment assets do not have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements
under Ontario Regulation 588/17. Instead, the Municipality is required to establish levels of
service reporting from two different levels, i.e. community levels of service and technical levels
of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of Machinery & Equipment. Technical levels of
service describe the scope and quality of Machinery & Equipment through performance
measures that can be quantified, evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides
services. The table below presents the current levels of service as required by Ontario
Regulation 588/17.
`
Page | 29
Level of Service – Machinery & Equipment
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description, of Machinery &
Equipment components.
Machinery & Equipment consists of capitalized tools and
equipment to support departmental requirements in levy
supported departments including Public Works, General
Government, Parks & Recreation and the Fire
Department.
Technical Levels of Service
Year 2018 2019
Percentage of Machinery &
Equipment with use restrictions
8% 0%
Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Machinery & Equipment Work
Orders
4 2
ROAD NETWORK
The Municipality of Bayham road network consists of roads with various surface types, including
asphalt, tar & chip, and gravel. Appendix ‘D’ Road Classification Map, Appendix ‘E’ Road
Surface Map, Appendix ‘F’ Guardrail Map, Appendix ‘G’ Sidewalk Map and Appendix ‘H’
Streetlight Map illustrate road network characteristics. The table below further defines the
Municipality of Bayham Road Network attributes.
Road Network – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Asset
Component
Quantity Average Age
(Years)
Useful Life
(Years)
Road Network
Road Base 205 km 58 80
Road Surface -
Asphalt
37.9 km 18 25
Road Surface –
Tar & Chip
105.2km 10 15
Road Surface -
Gravel
61.9 km 48 20
Guardrail 798 m 5 20
Sidewalk 18.3 km 23 50
Streetlights 428 3 20
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. The Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan also incorporates actual field
condition data which provides a more meaningful and representative presentation of the
Municipality's state of infrastructure. For road infrastructure the Municipality utilizes a
Roads Need Study. The Roads Need Study assigns a point rating system to score road
condition. The rating system components include:
`
Page | 30
Characteristic Assessment Criteria
Horizontal Alignment deductions for major/minor curves, alignment concerns, hazards
Vertical Alignment deductions for major/minor vertical curves, steep grades, hazards
Surface Width road width, deductions for steep side slopes
Surface Condition overall road surface condition, upgrades, problem areas
Shoulder Width road configuration, shoulder width (including grassed shoulders)
Structural Adequacy road structure, deductions for structural problem areas, hazards
Drainage System deductions for drainage concerns, problem areas
Maintenance Demand deductions for increased road maintenance
The Municipality supplements Roads Need Study data utilizing Laserfiche Service Request
Forms, Maintenance Tracking Forms and Work Order Forms to track additional resources
inputs to each asset segment. The table below shows the distribution of assets based on the
assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the Road Network average asset condition classification trend over time.
Road Network Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Road
Network
Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair Fair Fair
`
Page | 31
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The Road Network lifecycle replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is estimated as
$21,299,310 or $2,129,931 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $14,834,030 or $1,483,403 on average per
year. This is 69.65% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle
cost.
The anticipated budget for road network leaves a shortfall of $646,528 average per year of the
forecast lifecycle costs required to provide services. The forecast lifecycle replacement costs
necessary to provide road network infrastructure include:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services:
o salaries
o materials
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition. Maintenance activities enable an asset to provide service
for its planned life:
o loosetop maintenance
o dust control
o weed/brush/ditch
o grading
o safety devices
o materials
o service contracts
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o crack sealing
o gravel road resurfacing
o reconstruction
o replacement
o resurfacing
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service operational activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $451,041
`
Page | 32
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Maintenance At the current level of service maintenance activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $115,578
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities funding leaves a
shortfall of $646,528 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $916,784
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
Road Network Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
`
Page | 33
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Road assets have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under Ontario Regulation
588/17. These requirements include levels of service reporting from two different levels, i.e.
community levels of service and technical levels of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of the road network. Technical levels of service
describe the scope and quality of Municipal roads through performance measures that can be
quantified, evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides services. The table
below presents the current levels of service as mandated by Ontario Regulation 588/17.
Level of Service - Roads
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description, which may include
maps, of the road network in
the municipality and its level of
connectivity.
Please refer to Appendix ‘D’ Road Classification Map,
Appendix ‘E’ Road Surface Map, Appendix ‘F’ Guardrail
Map, Appendix ‘G’ Sidewalk Map, Appendix ‘H’ Streetlight
Map and the Municipality of Bayham Roads Needs Study
to illustrate road network characteristics.
Description or images that
illustrate the different levels of
road class pavement condition.
Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham Roads Needs
Study
Technical Levels of Service
Year 2018 2019
Number of lane-kilometres of
local roads as a proportion of
square kilometres of land area
of the Municipality (248 km2)
1.65 lane km/km2 1.65 lane km/km2
The average road condition
index value.
32 57
Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Road Network Service
Requests/Work Orders
439 378
STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE
The Municipality of Bayham Stormwater infrastructure consists of approximately 11.9 kilometres
of Stormwater Infrastructure in the Village of Vienna and the Village of Port Burwell. The table
below further defines the Municipality of Bayham Stormwater Infrastructure attributes.
Stormwater Infrastructure – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Quantity Average
Age
(Years)
Useful
Life
(Years)
Port Burwell Storm System 6.1 km 48 50
Port Burwell Storm System – Phase 1A 0.6 km 2 50
Port Burwell Storm System – Phase 1B 0.5 km 1 50
Vienna Storm System 4.7 km 38 50
`
Page | 34
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. In general, this approach may not be reflective of an asset's actual condition and
the true nature of its deterioration, which tends to accelerate toward the end of the asset's
lifecycle. For Stormwater Infrastructure the Municipality utilizes a Stormwater Infrastructure
Assessment. The Stormwater Infrastructure Assessment defines a detailed element by
element visual inspection of each asset component, and recommended
rehabilitation/replacement works and associated estimated costs.
The Municipality supplements Stormwater Infrastructure Assessment data utilizing Laserfiche
Service Request Forms, Maintenance Tracking Forms and Work Order Forms to track
additional resources inputs to each asset segment. The table below shows the distribution of
assets based on the assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the Stormwater Infrastructure average asset condition classification
trend over time.
Stormwater Infrastructure Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Stormwater
Infrastructure
Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor
`
Page | 35
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The Stormwater Infrastructure lifecycle replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is
estimated as $19,529,614 or $1,952,961 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $1,637,403 or $163,740 on average per
year. This is 8.38% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle cost.
The anticipated budget for stormwater infrastructure leaves a shortfall of $1,789,221 average
per year of the forecast lifecycle costs required to provide services. The forecast lifecycle
replacement costs necessary to provide stormwater infrastructure include:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services
o catch basin & culvert flush/vac
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition.
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o reconstruction
o rehabilitation
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service operational activities can be completed
within the current planned budget.
Budget/Year $37,961
Maintenance At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset maintenance.
Budget/Year $0
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities funding leaves a
shortfall of $1,789,221 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $125,779
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
`
Page | 36
Stormwater Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Stormwater Infrastructure has prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under Ontario
Regulation 588/17. These requirements include levels of service reporting from two different
levels, i.e. community levels of service and technical levels of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of the Stormwater Infrastructure. Technical
levels of service describe the scope and quality of Stormwater Infrastructure through
performance measures that can be quantified, evaluated, and detail how effectively the
Municipality provides services. The table below presents the current levels of service as
mandated by Ontario Regulation 588/17.
`
Page | 37
Level of Service – Stormwater Infrastructure
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description, which may include
maps, of the user groups or
areas of the municipality that
are protected from flooding,
including the extent of the
protection provided by the
municipal stormwater
management system.
Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham Stormwater
Infrastructure Assessment and the Municipality of Bayham
Drainage Master Plan for the components of the municipal
stormwater infrastructure serving the Village of Vienna and
Village of Port Burwell (904 properties)
Technical Levels of Service
Year 2018 2019
Percentage of properties in
municipality resilient to a 100-
year storm.
0% 3%
Percentage of the municipal
stormwater management
system resilient to a 5-year
storm.
0% 3%
Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Stormwater Infrastructure
Service Requests/Work Orders
13 11
Stormwater Flood Events 3 4
VEHICLES
The Municipality of Bayham Vehicle Fleet consists of Construction Vehicles, Fire Trucks, Pickup
Trucks and Tandem Trucks. Appendix ‘I’ Vehicle Inventory illustrates the Vehicle Fleet
characteristics. The table below further defines the Municipality of Bayham Vehicles
attributes.
Vehicles – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Asset
Component
Quantity Average Age
(Years)
Useful Life
(Years)
Vehicle Fleet
Construction 4 7 15
Construction 1 11 20
Fire Department 6 10 20
Pickup Truck 7 7 10
Tandem Truck 4 5 10
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. In general, this approach may not be reflective of an asset's actual condition and
the true nature of its deterioration, which tends to accelerate toward the end of the asset's
lifecycle. For Vehicles the Municipality utilizes Equipment Service Request Forms and
annual safety requirements. The table below shows the distribution of assets based on the
assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
`
Page | 38
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the vehicle average asset condition classification trend over time.
Vehicle Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Vehicle Poor Poor Fair Fair Good Good Good
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The vehicle lifecycle replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is estimated as $8,595,696
or $859,570 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $4,090,834 or $409,083 on average per
year. This is 47.59% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle
cost.
The anticipated budget for vehicles leaves a shortfall of $450,486 average per year of the
forecast lifecycle costs required to provide services. The forecast lifecycle replacement costs
necessary to provide vehicle infrastructure includes:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services
o fuel
`
Page | 39
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition. Maintenance activities enable an asset to provide service
for its planned life:
o equipment service requests
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o replacement
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service operational activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $138,357
Maintenance At the current level of service maintenance activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $144,948
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities funding leaves a
shortfall of $450,487 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $125,779
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
Vehicle Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
`
Page | 40
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Vehicle assets do not have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under Ontario
Regulation 588/17. Instead, the Municipality is required to establish levels of service reporting
from two different levels, i.e. community levels of service and technical levels of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of Vehicles. Technical levels of service describe
the scope and quality of Vehicles through performance measures that can be quantified,
evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides services. The table below
presents the current levels of service as required by Ontario Regulation 588/17.
Level of Service – Vehicles
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description, of Vehicles The Municipality of Bayham Vehicle Fleet consists of
Construction Vehicles, Fire Trucks, Pickup Trucks and
Tandem Trucks. Appendix ‘I’ Vehicle Inventory
illustrates the Vehicle Fleet characteristics.
Technical Levels of Service
Year 2018 2019
Total Fuel Consumption 117,804 litres 77,985 litres
Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Equipment Service Requests 91 106
WATER INFRASTRUCTURE
The Municipality of Bayham Water Infrastructure consists of the Bayham Water System and the
Richmond Water System. Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Study
for details pertaining to the systems. The table below further defines the Municipality of
Bayham Water Infrastructure attributes.
Water Infrastructure – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Asset
Component
Average Age
(Years)
Useful Life
(Years)
Water
Infrastructure
Curb Stops 26 35
Fire Hydrants 26 35
Water Mains 60 100
Water Treatment
Plant
5 20
Water Meters 3 25
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. In general, this approach may not be reflective of an asset's actual condition and
the true nature of its deterioration, which tends to accelerate toward the end of the asset's
`
Page | 41
lifecycle. For Water Infrastructure the Municipality utilizes a robust preventative
maintenance program and provincial accountability regime. The table below shows the
distribution of assets based on the assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
The table below shows the Water Infrastructure average asset condition classification trend over
time.
Water Infrastructure Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Vehicle Good Good Good Good Good Very Good Very Good
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The Water Infrastructure replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is estimated as
$9,139,190 or $913,919 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $9,139,190 or $913,919 on average per
year. This is 100.00% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle
cost.
The anticipated budget for water infrastructure is in accordance with the Municipality of Bayham
Water/Wastewater study. The forecast lifecycle replacement costs necessary to provide water
infrastructure include:
`
Page | 42
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services
o lab fees
o licenses
o audits
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition. Maintenance activities enable an asset to provide service
for its planned life:
o system maintenance
o equipment maintenance
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o replacement
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service operational activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $811,274
Maintenance At the current level of service maintenance activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $39,756
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities include a reserve
transfer of $62,889 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $62,889
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
`
Page | 43
Water Infrastructure Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Water assets have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under Ontario Regulation
588/17. These requirements include levels of service reporting from two different levels, i.e.
community levels of service and technical levels of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of water infrastructure. Technical levels of
service describe the scope and quality of water infrastructure through performance measures
that can be quantified, evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides services.
The table below presents the current levels of service as mandated by Ontario Regulation
588/17.
`
Page | 44
Level of Service - Water
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description, which may
include maps, of the user
groups or areas of the
municipality that are
connected to the municipal
water system.
Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham
Water/Wastewater Study for details pertaining to the
systems.
Description, which may
include maps, of the user
groups or areas of the
municipality that have fire flow.
The Bayham System has access to fire flow. Please refer
to the Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Study for
details pertaining to the systems.
Description of boil water
advisories and service
interruptions.
0 Boil Water Advisory
7 Service Interruptions
1 Boil Water Advisory
11 Service Interruptions
Technical Levels of Service – Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Percentage of properties
connected to the municipal
water system.
32% 32%
Percentage of properties where
fire flow is available.
30% 30%
The number of connection-
days per year where a boil
water advisory notice is in
place compared to the total
number of properties
connected to the municipal
water system.
N/A N/A
The number of connection-days
per year due to water main
breaks compared to the total
number of properties connected
to the municipal water system.
N/A N/A
WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE
Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Study for details pertaining to the
Wastewater System. The table below further defines the Municipality of Bayham
Wastewater Infrastructure attributes.
`
Page | 45
Wastewater Infrastructure – Asset Attributes
Asset Type Asset
Component
Average Age
(Years)
Useful Life
(Years)
Wastewater
Infrastructure
Sewer Mains 24 100
Sewer Valves 20 35
Wastewater
Equipment
9 15
Wastewater
Facilities
8 75
Wastewater
Facilities
22 50
Wastewater
Facilities
20 20
Wastewater
Vehicles
7 10
The Municipality utilizes a straight-line amortization schedule approach to depreciate capital
assets. In general, this approach may not be reflective of an asset's actual condition and
the true nature of its deterioration, which tends to accelerate toward the end of the asset's
lifecycle. For Wastewater Infrastructure the Municipality utilizes a robust preventative
maintenance program and provincial accountability regime. The table below shows the
distribution of assets based on the assessed condition and replacement cost of the same.
Condition
Classification No.
Condition
Classification
Assed Condition
(Remaining Life)
1 Very Good 75%+
2 Good 74% - 50%
3 Fair 49% - 25%
4 Poor 24% - 0%
`
Page | 46
The table below shows the Wastewater Infrastructure average asset condition classification
trend over time.
Wastewater Infrastructure Average Asset Condition Trend
Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Vehicle Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
REPLACEMENT PROFILE
The Wastewater Infrastructure replacement costs for a 10 year forecast period is estimated as
$10,941,600 or $1,094,160 on average per year.
Estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $10,941,600 or $1,094,160 on average per
year. This is 100.00% of the cost to sustain the current level of service at the lowest lifecycle
cost.
The anticipated budget for wastewater infrastructure is in accordance with the Municipality of
Bayham Water/Wastewater study. The forecast lifecycle replacement costs necessary to
provide wastewater infrastructure include:
• Acquisition – the activities to provide a higher level of service or a new service that did
not exist previously.
• Operation – the regular activities to provide services
o lab fees
o licenses
o audits
• Maintenance – the activities necessary to retain an asset as near as practicable to an
appropriate service condition. Maintenance activities enable an asset to provide service
for its planned life:
o system maintenance
o equipment maintenance
• Renewal – the activities that return the service capability of an asset up to that which it
had originally provided:
o replacement
o lining
• Disposal – the activities associated with the disposal of a decommissioned asset
including sale, demolition or relocation.
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Acquisition At the current level of service the Municipality does not project any
lifecycle costs associated with asset acquisition.
Budget/Year $0
Operation At the current level of service operational activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year 654,050
`
Page | 47
Lifecycle Activity Current Performance
Maintenance At the current level of service maintenance activities can be completed
within the current planned budget
Budget/Year $62,773
Renewal At the current level of service renewal activities include a reserve
transfer of $186,434 average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs
required to provide services.
Budget/Year $377,337
Disposal The Municipality does not project any lifecycle costs associated with
asset disposal.
Budget/Year $0
Wastewater Infrastructure Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
The bars in the graphs represent the forecast costs, in current dollars, needed to minimize the
life cycle costs associated with the service provision. The proposed budget line indicates the
estimate of available funding. The gap between the forecast work and the proposed budget is
the basis of the discussion on achieving balance between costs, levels of service and risk to
achieve the best value outcome.
`
Page | 48
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Wastewater assets have prescribed levels of service reporting requirements under Ontario
Regulation 588/17. These requirements include levels of service reporting from two different
levels, i.e. community levels of service and technical levels of service.
Community levels of service objectives describe service levels in terms that citizens understand
and reflect their scope and quality expectations of wastewater infrastructure. Technical levels of
service describe the scope and quality of wastewater infrastructure through performance
measures that can be quantified, evaluated, and detail how effectively the Municipality provides
services. The table below presents the current levels of service as mandated by Ontario
Regulation 588/17.
Level of Service - Wastewater
Community Level of Service – Qualitative Descriptions
Year 2018 2019
Description, which may include
maps, of the user groups or
areas of the municipality that are
connected to the municipal
wastewater system.
Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham
Water/Wastewater Study for details pertaining to the
systems.
Description of how combined
sewers in the municipal
wastewater system are
designed with overflow
structures in place which allow
overflow during storm events
to prevent backups into
homes.
The Municipality of Bayham does not utilize or manage
combined sewers. Please refer to the Municipality of
Bayham Water/Wastewater Study for details pertaining to
the systems.
Description of the frequency
and volume of overflows in
combined sewers in the
municipal wastewater system
that occur in habitable areas
or beaches.
The Municipality of Bayham does not utilize or manage
combined sewers. Please refer to the Municipality of
Bayham Water/Wastewater Study for details pertaining to
the systems.
Description of how
stormwater can get into
sanitary sewers in the
municipal wastewater
system, causing sewage to
overflow into streets or
backup into homes.
The Municipality of Bayham does not utilize or manage
combined sewers. Illegal sump connections into the
wastewater system would be the only method for
stormwater into the wastewater system. Please refer to
the Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Study for
details pertaining to the systems.
Description of how sanitary
sewers in the municipal
wastewater system are
designed to be resilient to avoid
overflow events
The Wastewater By-law prohibits connection of
stormwater to the wastewater system. The Municipality of
Bayham does not utilize or manage combined sewers.
Please refer to the Municipality of Bayham
Water/Wastewater Study for details pertaining to the
systems.
Description of the effluent that
is discharged from sewage
treatment plants in the
After treatment at the Wastewater Treatment Plant
effluent is processed through the Exfiltration Gallery
consisting of a series of buried perforated pipe sections,
located on land surrounding the wastewater treatment
`
Page | 49
municipal wastewater system. plant, designed to retain effluent discharge from the SBR-
based treatment system and allowing effluent to percolate
into the native sand and mix with the subsurface water to
Lake Erie.
Technical Levels of Service – Key Performance Indicators
Year 2018 2019
Percentage of properties
connected to the municipal
wastewater system.
49% 49%
The number of events per
year where combined sewer
flow in the municipal
wastewater system exceeds
system capacity compared to
the total number of properties
connected to the municipal
wastewater system.
N/A N/A
The number of connection-
days per year due to
wastewater backups
compared to the total number
of properties connected to the
municipal wastewater system.
N/A N/A
The number of effluent violations
per year due to wastewater
discharge compared to the total
number of properties connected
to the municipal wastewater
system.
N/A N/A
Section 13 – Financial Strategy – Levy Supported Infrastructure
The forecast lifecycle costs for levy supported infrastructure necessary to provide the services
covered by this Asset Management Plan includes operation, maintenance, renewal, acquisition,
and disposal of assets. Although the Asset Management Plan may be prepared for a range of
time periods, it typically informs a Long-Term Financial Planning period of 10 years. Therefore,
a summary output from the Asset Management Plan is the forecast of 10 year total planned
budget outlays, which for levy supported infrastructure is estimated as $57,258,364 or
$5,725,836 on average per year.
The estimated available funding for the 10 year period is $27,602,668 or $2,760,267. This is
48.21% of the cost to sustain the levy supported infrastructure current level of service at the
lowest lifecycle cost.
The infrastructure reality is that only what is funded in the planned budget can be provided.
Informed decision-making depends on the Asset Management Plan emphasising the
consequences of planned budgets on the service levels provided and risks. The anticipated
planned budget for levy supported infrastructure leaves an infrastructure deficit of $2,965,571
average per year of the forecast lifecycle costs required to provide services in the Asset
Management Plan compared with the planned budget as outlined below.
`
Page | 50
Levy Supported Infrastructure Forecast Lifecycle Costs and Planned Budgets
A comparison of the 2016 Asset Management Plan to the 2020 Infrastructure Management Plan
solely on the basis of infrastructure funding, not lifecycle costs, is as outlined in the table below:
Asset Management
Plan Model
Infrastructure
Funding Required
Infrastructure Funding
Available
Infrastructure
Deficit
2016 $3,664,800 $922,000 $2,742,800
2020 $4,190,571 $1,225,000 $2,965,571
2020* $4,190,571 $1,566,000 $2,624,571
*Includes Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF)
Infrastructure Funding required increased over the planning period by 15% or 3%/year. Over the
same period the Municipality’s efforts to address the Infrastructure Deficit resulted in an
increase of the Infrastructure Deficit by $222,771 or a decrease in the Infrastructure Deficit by
$118,229 depending on if the Municipality believes the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund
(OCIF) is long-term stable infrastructure funding. Regardless of the Infrastructure Deficit
scenario the significant lack of decrease in the same is troubling as during the Asset
Management Model period the Municipality received 175%/year or $198,390/year more
infrastructure application based grants than the previous five year period.
When the financial plan component of the Asset Management Plan results in a funding shortfall,
the province requires the inclusion of a specific plan as to how the impact of the shortfall will be
managed. In determining the legitimacy of a funding shortfall, the province may evaluate a
municipality's approach to the following:
`
Page | 51
• In order to reduce financial requirements, consideration has been given to revising
service levels downward.
• All asset management and financial strategies have been considered. For example: If a
zero debt policy is in place, is it warranted? If not, the use of debt should be considered.
• Do user fees reflect the cost of the applicable service? If not, increased user fees should
be considered.
Considering all of the above information, staff recommend a financial strategy that involves full
funding being achieved over 25 years by:
1) Increasing the Capital Levy by 3% each year for the next 25 years to ensure the Capital
Levy is indexed based on historic data. In 2021 this would amount to $30,000. This
amount should be calculated annually and adjusted to reflect the actual CPI/NRBCPI
indices.
2) Increase the Capital Levy by $105,000 each year for the next 25 years.
3) Annually utilize assessment growth to add additional funds to the Capital Levy.
4) In 2024 when recycling costs shift to producer responsibility allocate recycling levy
capacity to the Capital Levy.
5) Explore non-infrastructure options to reduce the funding shortfall:
a. reduction of assets or asset portfolios
b. extension of asset lifecycles based on experience and asset capabilities
(requires amendments to By-law No. 2009-080)
Raising Capital Levy tax revenues by the amounts recommended above for infrastructure
purposes will be difficult, especially in the context of a pandemic, however, the 25 year phase-in
window has significant opportunity for infrastructure failure and inadequacies. Extending the
phase in period over an even greater timeframe has more severe consequences in terms of
infrastructure failure.
Historic Capital Levy
Capital Levy Capital Transfer Total Capital Capital Change
2010 $761,065 $0 $761,065 N/A
2011 $762,465 $0 $762,465 $1,400
2012 $973,302 $0 $973,302 $210,837
2013 $879,081 $0 $879,081 -$94,221
2014 $726,995 $0 $726,995 -$152,086
2015 $585,889 $0 $585,889 -$141,106
2016 $289,141 $0 $289,141 -$296,748
2017 $422,000 $138,410 $560,410 $271,269
2018 $559,000 $118,671 $677,671 $117,261
2019 $713,100 $74,614 $787,714 $110,043
2020 $895,000 $53,611 $948,611 $160,897
2021 $900,000 $0 $900,000 -$48,611
`
Page | 52
Based on the historic Capital Levy these are realistic solutions to reducing the Infrastructure
deficit, funding shortfall and producing a sustainable and reliable infrastructure future.
Section 14 – Financial Strategy – User Fee Supported Infrastructure
The Municipality of Bayham maintains the Water & Wastewater Infrastructure in accordance
with the Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Financial Plan. The Municipality of Bayham
Water/Wastewater Financial Plan is updated every 5 years by qualified professionals pursuant
to applicable legislation. Following the Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Financial
Plan has resulted in fully funded Water & Wastewater Infrastructure. The Municipality should
continue to implement and follow the recommendations of qualified professionals in each
Municipality of Bayham Water/Wastewater Financial Plan.
!(
")
!(
!(
!(
")
!(
")
")
")")
")
!(
!(!(
C-7C-6
C-8
B-7 B-6
B-5
B-4
C-5
B-3
C-4
C-3
C-2
B-2
C-1
B-10PLANK RDEDEN LINE
CALTON LINETALBOT LINERICHMOND RDHERITAGE LINE
COYLE RDLIGHT LINE
JACKSON LINE
TUN LINE
ELGIN COUNTY ROAD 55CULLODEN RDBEST LINE
VIENNA LINE
GLEN ERIE LINETOLL GATE RDGREEN LINE
GODBY RDSPRINGER HILL RDCARSON LINE
CLARKE RDMAPLE GROVE LINEL A M E R S L IN E
NOVA SCOTIA LINE
BROWN RDSOMERS RDELLIOTT RDC H U T E L I N EBOGUS RDMITCHELL RDR ID G E L IN E
WOODWORTH RDMURRAY RDOTTERGATE LINE
B
A
Y
H
A
M
D
R
HOWEY LINE
E D IS O N D R SCHAFFER RDGARNER RDCTR STCHATHAM STBEATTIE RDDENNIS RDJAMES LINE
TEALL NEVILL RDN STOAK
VINCENT LINEBALL LINE
CK RDPITT ST
MAIN ST
ELM STBALDWIN LINE
3RD ST
CSINOS RDSOMERS RDTOLL GATE RDSPRINGER HILL RDSOMERS RDMITCHELL RD0 2 41
Kilometers
®
Map Produced by:Township of Malahide GIS Department
Projection: NAD 83 UTM Zone 17
Date: 2020This drawing is neither a legally recorded mapnor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
Municipality of
Bayham
Bridges and Culverts
!(
")Bridges
Culverts
B-2 - CARSON
B-3 - BAYNOR SOUTH
B-4 - STEWART
B-5 - LIGHT LINE
B-6 - TUNNEL
B-7 - GODBY
B-10 - CLARK
C-1 - SOMERS
C-2 - BEST
C-3 - EDEN
C-4 - SPRINGER HILL
C-5 - HOWEY
C-6 - TUNNEL WEST
C-7 - TUNNEL EAST
C-8 - SOUTH OTTER
Notes:
Lake Erie
OAK
ADDISON STCARSON LINE
MITCHELL RDGRAY ST
TOLL GATE RD4TH ST
LIGHT LINERICHMOND RDPLANK RDW STBEST LINE
GARNER RDN STTALBOT LINE2ND ST
CTR STEDISON DR
JOHN ST
BROWN RDSTAFFORD RDNOVA SCOTIA LINE
S
T
E
WART
R
D
EDEN LINE
ORCH LINE
CLARKE RDSOPER RDC H U T E L IN E
CSINOS RDCK RDLK SHORE LINE
BALDWIN LINE
OTTERGATE LINE
CHAPEL STJACKSON LINE
CALTON LINE
TUN LINESPRINGER HILL RDWOODWORTH RDBALL LINE SCHAFFER RDELLIOTT RDDENNIS RDMAPLE GROVE LINEJAMES LINE
HERITAGE LINE
L A M E R S L IN E
VINCENT LINE
M
C
Q
UIG
G
A
N LIN
E
GLEN ERIE LINE
GREEN LINE
BEATTI
E RDTEALL NEVILL RDHOWEY LINE
BOGUS RDB
AY
H
A
M D
R
MURRAY RDGREGSON RDCOYLE RDCULLODEN RDELGIN COUNTY ROAD 55SOMERS RDGODBY RDSANDYTOWN RDVIENNA LINE RIDG E LIN E1 2
3
4
5
6
8
7
910
0 2 41
Kilometers
®
Map Produced by:Township of Malahide GIS Department
Projection: NAD 83 UTM Zone 17
Date: 2020This drawing is neither a legally recorded mapnor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
Municipality of
Bayham
Facilities
")Facilities
Notes:
Lake Erie
1. Straffordville Community Centre,
56169 Heritage Line, Straffordville, ON
2. Straffordville Library,
9366 Plank Road, Straffordville, ON
3. Straffordville Station | Bayham
Station No. 2,
55764 Third Street, Straffordville ON
4. Public Works Yard,
8354 Plank Rd., Bayham, ON
5. Vienna Community Centre,
26 Fulton St. Vienna, ON
6. East Beach Washroom Building,
1 Robinson St., Port Burwell, ON
7. Port Burwell Station | Bayham
Station No. 1,
55451 Nova Scotia Line, Port Burwell,
ON
8. Port Burwell Library,
21 Pitt St., Port Burwell, ON
9. Marine Museum,
20 Pitt St., Port Burwell, ON
10. Port Burwell Lighthouse,
17 Robinson St., Port Burwell, ON
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!
!
!!!!!!
!
!!!!
!!!!!
!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
OAK
CHATHAM STVICTORIA STCARSON LINE
MITCHELL RDTOLL GATE RDLIGHT LINERICHMOND RDA N N S T PLANK RD5TH ST
E STBEST LINE
GARNER RDN STOTTERGATE LINE
TALBOT LINE3RD ST
CTR STEDISON DR
BROWN RDSTAFFORD RDNOVA SCOTIA LINE
S
T
E
WA
R
T
R
D
EDEN LINE
ORCH LINE
CLARKE RDC H U T E L IN E
CSINOS RDCK RDLK SHORE LINE
BALDWIN LINE
JACKSON LINE
CALTON LINE
TUN LINESPRINGER HILL RDWOODWORTH RDBALL LINE SCHAFFER RDELLIOTT RDDENNIS RDMAPLE GROVE LINEJAMES LINE
HERITAGE LINE
L A M E R S L IN E
GLEN ERIE LINE
GREEN LINE
BEATTI
E RDTEALL NEVILL RDHOWEY LINE
BOGUS RDB
AY
H
A
M D
R
MURRAY RDBAYHAM NORFOLK BOUNDARY RDGREGSON RDCOYLE RDCULLODEN RDELGIN COUNTY ROAD 55SOMERS RDGODBY RDSANDYTOWN RDVIENNA LINE RIDG E LINE0 2 41
Kilometers
®
Map Produced by:Township of Malahide GIS Department
Projection: NAD 83 UTM Zone 17
Date: 2021This drawing is neither a legally recorded mapnor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
Municipality of
Bayham
Land Improvements
Notes:
Lake Erie
!Ball Diamond: 3
!Basketball Court: 4
!Bench: 13
!Bleachers: 2
!Concrete Pad: 2
!Digital Sign: 1
!Fencing: 6
!Flag Poles: 6
!Lighting: 2
!Pavilion: 4
!Picnic Table: 13
!Pier: 1
!Playground Equipment: 7
!Recycling Amenities: 12
!Soccer Nets: 3
!Tennis Court: 1
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
BEST LINE
®
Township of Malahide GIS DepartmentNAD 83 U TM Zone 17Date: 2021This drawing is neither a legally recorded mapnor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
Municipality of
Bayham
Land Improvements
!
!
!
!
!
!
HERITAGE LINE
CHURCH ST
!
!
!
!
!
!
EDEN LINE
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
HERITAGE LINE
HESCH STOLD CHAPEL STGARNHAM ST1ST ST
W STDUKE STPLANK RDARTHUR ST
MAIN ST
!Ball Dia mond
!Basketba ll Cou rt
!Bench
!Ble achers
!Concre te P ad
!Dig ita l Sig n
!Fencing
!Flag Pole s
!Lighting
!Pavilion
!Picnic Tab le
!Pie r
!Pla yg ro und Eq uipme nt
!Recycling Ame nitie s
!Soccer Nets
!Ten nis Cou rt
0 50 10025 Meters 0 50 10025 Meters
0 25 5012.5 Meters 0 150 30075 Me ters
!
JACKSON LINEPLANK RD®
Township of Malahide GIS DepartmentNAD 83 U TM Zone 17Date: 2021This drawing is neither a legally recorded mapnor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
Municipality of
Bayham
Land Improvements
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!BRI
DGE STCHATHAM STNOVA SCOTIA LINE!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!EDI
SON DRF U L T O N S T ELM STUNION STPLANK RDSNOW STA N N S T
PI
NE STOAK ST!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!!
!CHATHAM STROBINSON STERIEUS STSTRACHAN STBROCK ST
PITT ST
!Ball Diamond
!Basketball Court
!Bench
!Bleachers
!Concrete Pad
!Digital Sign
!Fencing
!Flag Poles
!Lighting
!Pavilion
!Picnic Table
!Pier
!Playground Equipment
!Recycling Amenities
!Soccer Nets
!Tennis Court
0 50 10025 Meters 0 100 20050 Meters
0 50 10025 Meters 0 100 20050 Meters Lake Erie
LIGHT LINE
CARSON LINE BAYHAM DRI
VETUNNEL LINE
CALTON LINE
EDEN LINE
JACKSON LINERICHMOND ROADGLEN ERIE LINE
BEST LINE
VIENNA LINE
GREEN LINE
STEWART ROADMITCHELL ROADPLANK ROADMURRAY ROADT A L B O T L IN E
HERITAGE LINECULLODEN ROADTOLL GATE ROADC O Y L E R O A DOTTERGATE LINE
M A P L E GR O V E L IN E
P R E S S E Y R O A D
LA M E R S L I N EBEATTIE ROADSOMERS ROADELGIN COUNTY ROAD 55SPRINGER HILL ROADCLARKE ROADNOVA SCOTIA LINE WOODWORTH ROADGOSHEN ROADEDEN LINE
P L A N K R O A D
H
E
R
IT
A
G
E
LI
N
E
PLANK ROADPLANK ROADHERITAGE LINE
MAPLE GROVE LINE
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Ü
0 5 102.5
Kilometers
L A K E E R I E
Rural Area Road Classes
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6
T O W N S H I P O F S O U T H -W E S T O X F O R D
TOWNSHIPOFMALAHIDENORFOLK COUNTY
HARMONY
ACRES
LINE GOSHEN RDBLACK BRIDGE
LINE BAYNOR RDORANGE HALL R D
PLANK ROADEDEN LINE
CALTON LINETALBOT LINEH E R I T A G E L I N E
LIGHT LINE
JACKSON LINE
RICHMOND ROADELGIN COUNTY ROAD 55COYLE ROADBEST LINE
CULLODEN ROADTUNNEL LINE
VIENNA LINE
GLEN ERIE LINE
GREEN LINE
TOLL GATE ROADLAKE SHORE LINE
CARSON LINE
SPRINGER HILL ROADGODBY ROADSANDYTOWN ROADM A P LE G R O V E LIN E
L A M E R S L IN E
NOVA SCOTIA LINE
CLARKE ROADC H U T E L I N E
R I D G E L I N EOTTERGATE LINE
S
T
E
W
A
R
T R
O
A
D
BROWN ROADSOMERS ROADMITCHELL ROADBOGUS ROADHOWEY LINEMURRAY ROADBAYHAM DRI
VEGREGSON ROADBAYHAM NORFOLK BOUNDARY ROADJAMES LINE SCHAFFER ROADOAK
GARNER ROADE D IS O N D R IV E
BALL LINE
BEATTIE ROADCHATHAM STREETDENNIS ROADVICTORIA STREETF U L T O N S T R E E TCREEK ROADLAKESHORE LINEERIEUS STREETCSINOS ROADSPRINGER HILL ROADSOMERS ROADBEST LINE
TOLL GATE ROADMITCHELL ROADBAYHAM DRIVEBayham Roads Surface Type STAFFORDRD0 2 41 Kilometers
Asphalt
Ta r/Chip
Gravel
Road Not M aintaine d
Laneway
Provincia l High way
Elgin C ounty Roa d
±
Lake Erie
ASHLEY AVENUE
CHATHAM STREETVICTORIA STREETERIEUS STREETTOLL GATE ROADLIGHT LINE
VIENNA LINE
CENTRE STREETEDISON DRIVE
BROWN ROADNOVA SCOTIA LINE
GODBY ROADNOVA SCOTI
A LI
NELAKE SHORE LINESOPER ROADC H U T E L I N ECREEK ROADELGIN COUNTY ROAD 55STAFFORD ROADGLEN ERIE LINE
JACKSON LINE
CHAPEL STREETCLARKE ROADCALTON LINE
TUNNEL LINE
DONOVAN ROAD
BEACH LANEDENNIS ROADCOYLE ROADWOODWORTH ROADTEALL NEVILL ROADBOGUS ROADPLANK ROAD0 10.5
Kilometers
®
Map Produced by:Township of Malahide GIS DepartmentProjection:NAD 83 U TM Zone 17Date: 2020This drawing is neither alegally recorded mapnor a survey and is notintended to be used as one.
Municipality of
Bayham
Guardrail Overview
Map 1
Total Length in
Current Extent
9 Guardrails
798m
BARBARA
AVENUE VICTORIA STREETPITT S
T
R
E
E
TCHATHAMSTREETLIBBYEAVENUE
ELIZABETH STREETBODSWORTHALLEYADDISON STREETMCNEIL COURT
WELLINGTON STREET
NEWTON STREET
WATERLOO STREETMILTON STREETBRI
DGESTREETBROCK STREET
HOMER STREET
COWPER STREET
TENNYSON STREET
WILLIAM STREET
HANNAH STREETSubmarinersWayHURLEYSTREETPLANKROAD
WI
L
S
O
NLANE ROBINSONSTREETERIEUS STREETSTRACHAN STREETSHAKESPEARE STREETNOVA SCOTIA LINEµ0 100 20050
Meters
Port Burwell Sidewalks
Sidewalks 8210.48m
EDI
SON DRI
VEPLANK ROADF U L T O N S T R E E T ELM STREETA N N S T R E E T
C H A P E L S T R E E TUNION STREETC H E S T N U T S T R E E T
OAK STREETPI
NE STREETPEARL STREET
NORTH STREETQUEEN STREET
SNOW STREETFRONT STREETOAK STREETµ0 50 10025
Meters
Vienna Sidewalks
Sidew alks 1656.62m
PLANK ROADHERITAGE LINE
MAIN STREET
SANDYTOWN ROAD3RD STREET
STEWART ROAD
WEST STREET4 T H S T R E E T
2ND STREET
OLD CHAPEL STREETARTHUR STREET Alward StreetELGIN STREETSANDYTOWN ROADµ0 100 20050
Meters
Staffordville Sidewalks
Sidew alks 5884.49m
BEST LINECULLODEN ROADµ0 50 10025
Meters
Corinth Sidewalks
Sidew alks 778m
PLANK ROADEDEN LINE
GRAY STREET TRAVIS STREETµ0 50 10025
Meters
Eden Sidewalks
Sidew alks 940.06m
HERITAGE LINE
RICHMOND ROADJOHN STREET
CHURCH STREETJAMES STREETRICHM OND ROADµ0 50 10025
Meters
Richmond Sidewalks
Sidew alks 793m
PLANK RDEDEN LINE
CALTON
L
I
N
ETALBOT LINERICHMOND RDHER
I
T
A
G
E
L
I
N
E
COYLE RDLIGHT LI
N
E
JACKSO
N
L
I
N
E
TUN LIN
E
ELGIN COUNTY ROAD 55CULLODEN RDBEST LINE
VIENNA
L
I
N
E
GLEN E
R
I
E
L
I
N
ETOLL GATE RDGREEN LINE
GODBY RDSPRINGER HILL RDSANDYTOWN RDCARSON LINE
CLARKE RDMAPLE GROVE LINELAMERS LI
N
E
NOVA SC
O
T
I
A
L
I
N
E
BROWN RDSOMERS RDELLIOTT RDCHUTE LINEBOGUS RDMITCHELL RDRIDGE LINEWOODWORTH RDMURRAY RDOTTERGATE LINE
B
A
Y
H
A
M
D
R
EDISON D
R SCHAFFER RDGARNER RDCTR STCHATHAM STBEATTIE RDDENNIS RDJAMES L
I
N
E
TEALL NEVILL RDN STOAK
VINCENT LINEBALL
L
I
N
E
CK RDPITT ST
MAIN ST
ELM ST
BALDWIN LINE
3RD ST
CSINOS RDSPRINGER HILL RDTOLL GATE RDSOMERS RDSOMERS RDMITCHELL RD0 2 41
Kilometers
®
Map Produced by:Township of Malahide GIS Department
Projection: NAD 83 UTM Zone 17
Date: 2020This drawing is neither a legally recorded mapnor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
Municipality of
Bayham
Streetlights
Notes:
Lake Erie
428 Street Lights
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM
DEPARTMENT VEHICLE NO. YEAR DESCRIPTION
FIRE DEPARTMENT PUMP NO. 1 2005 ROSENBAUER PUMPER
FIRE DEPARTMENT TANKER NO. 1 2000 GMC TOP KICK TANKER
FIRE DEPARTMENT PUMP NO. 2 2009 ROSENBAUER PUMPER
FIRE DEPARTMENT TANKER NO. 2 2003 INTERNATIONAL TANKER
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMAND NO. 1 2017 CHEV SILVERADO
FIRE DEPARTMENT RESCUE NO. 1 2015 FORD F550
FIRE DEPARTMENT RESCUE NO.2 2015 FORD F550
BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING NO. 01 2017 CHEV SILVERADO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -09 2019 FRIEGHTLINER ROLL-OFF
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -02 2007 CHEV SILVERADO PU
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -17 2008 CHEV SILVERADO PU
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -14 2007 DODGE PU
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -18 2010 GMC PICKUP
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -04 2015 INTERNATIONAL 7600
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -08 2015 MACK DUMP
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -01 2017 CHEV SILVERADO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -06 2011 GRADER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -10 2011 CASE BACKHOE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -03 2012 INTERNATIONAL
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -13 2007 LOADER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -16 2018 BULLDOZER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PW -20 2006 JOHN DEERE TRACTOR