Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
April 04, 2019 - Council
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MUNICIPAL OFFICE 56169 Heritage Line, Straffordville, ON Council Chambers Thursday, April 4, 2019 7:00 p.m. 7:30 p.m. — Public Meeting — Planning — Isaac & Maria Froese 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 3. REVIEW OF ITEMS NOT LISTED ON AGENDA 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS 5. DELEGATIONS A. 7:05 p.m. — Elgin County Warden Duncan McPhail and Elgin County CAO Julie Gonyou re "Elgin County Services 2019 and beyond" 6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING(S) A. Regular Meeting held March 21, 2019 7. MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF MOTION 8. RECREATION, CULTURE, TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8.1 Correspondence 8.1.1 Receive for Information 8.1.2 Requiring Action 8.2 Reports to Council 9. PHYSICAL SERVICES — EMERGENCY SERVICES 9.1 Correspondence 9.1.1 Receive for Information 9.1.2 Requiring Action 9.2 Reports to Council A. Report FR-02/19 by Randy White, Fire Chief re Automatic Aid Agreement Assessment 10. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSERVATION 10.1 Correspondence 2019 Council Agenda April 4 2019 10.1.1 Receive for Information A. Notice of Public Meeting re Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment— Isaac & Maria Froese B. Notice of Passing of Zoning By-Law No. Z683-2019 — Municipality of Bayham C. Notice of Passing of Zoning By-Law No. Z684-2019 — Nichols 10.1.2 Requiring Action 10.2 Reports to Council A. Report DS-22/19 by Bill Knifton, Chief Building Official IDrainage Superintendent re Soper Road Drain 11. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION 11.1 Correspondence 11.1.1 Receive for Information A. Long Point Region Conservation Authority Media Release re Long Point Region Amended Source Protection Plan Approved 11.1.2 Requiring Action 11.2 Reports to Council A. Report CAO-22/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re Capital Item No. PR-2 Port Burwell Shed — Pavilion Conversion B. Report CAO-23/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re Vienna Community Centre C. Report CAO-24/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re 8354 Plank Road — Communication Tower D. Report CAO-25/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) — Rural & Northern Stream E. Report CAO-26/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re Elgin County Trails Strategy F. Report CAO-27/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re RFT 19-03 Sale of Surplus Equipment 12. BY-LAWS A. By-Law No. 2019-027 Being a by-law to amend By-Law No. 2019-017 a by-law to appoint Board and Committee Members B. By-Law No. 2019-028 Being a by-law to amend By-Law No. 2014-100 a by-law respecting the Municipal Pollution Control System and Municipal Storm Sewer System in the Municipality of Bayham and the establishment of Sewer Charges and Sewer Surcharge Rates (This by-law follows the recommendation in Report CAO-12119 by Paul Shipway, CA01Clerk during the regular meeting of February 21, 2019) 2 2019 Council Agenda April 4 2019 C. By-Law No. 2019-029 Being a by-law to appoint William Menzie and Officers of Municipal Enforcement Unit as Municipality of Bayham Municipal Law Enforcement Officers for the purpose of enforcing provisions of Municipality of Bayham By-laws (This by-law follows the recommendation in Report CAO-18119 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk during the regular meeting of February 21, 2019) D. By-Law No. 2019-030 Being a by-law to authorize the execution of an agreement between the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham and Franklin Construction (This by- law follows the recommendation in Report CAO-22119 by Paul Shipway, CA01 Clerk at the regular meeting of April 4, 2019) 13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 14. OTHER BUSINESS 14.1 In Camera A. Confidential Report regarding personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees (Human Resources) 14.2 Out of Camera 15. BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF COUNCIL A. By-Law No. 2019-031 Being a by-law to confirm all actions of Council 16. ADJOURNMENT 3 Elgin County Services 2019 and Beyond Municipal Partner Presentation Warden Duncan McPhail Julie Gonyou, Chief Administrative Officer Spring 2019 � ElginCounty Progressive by Nature Agenda Council Overview Priorities 2019 and of Current and "f ront Beyond Services burner issues " Overview of Current Services County Services • Emergency Medical Services (EMS) "land ambulance" Health Service'Iq delivered to County and City of St. Thomas Transportation' • Roads and Bridges • Permits, construction projects and Engineerin " • Facilities Management Corporatq.,�l • Purchasing, Information Services (IT) • Finance (payroll, pension, accounts Services payable/receivable) County Services wow Human 1 • Supports 450 staff (full-time and part-time) • Recruitment, discipline, training and development Resources • Accessibility (county-wide) Community a • • Libraries • Museums Cultural Services • Archives Planning an 'A• • Approval Authority for Official Plans and Plans of Subdivision/Condominium. Devetopmen'v 9 Land Division County Services -V Economic • Business attraction Et retention (Elgincentives) • Tourism Development Marketing and communications Legislative ,,, • Legal Services (County Lawyer Et Prosecutor) • Provincial Offences Administration Legal • Legislative Services (Clerk) do Tree • Tree Commissioner and Weed Inspector, shared with -A Kettle Creek Conservation Authority County Services r- - Emergency : communityEmergencyManagement Fire Training (county-wide) Services • 911 County SociaL • Social Services, Social Housing, Childcare Subsidy, Ontario Works, Employment Services • Delivered by the City of St. Thomas through Consolidated ServicesMunicipal Services Management Agreement (CMSM) Seniors • Long Term Care • Elgin Manor, Bobier Villa, Terrace Lodge - 247 beds Services • Adult Day program, Meals on Wheels, Stroke Day Program County Services • Southwestern Public Health, Board of Health Health Unit • Funded by City of St. Thomas, County of Elgin and County of Oxford -4 • "SWIFT" broadband program Regional Strategies • Regional Economic Development Strategies (WOWC) Health Recruitment/St. • City/County-wide physician recruitment • • Operational support for Public Art Centre Council Priorities and "f ront burner issues " Action Plan Capital Projects ► Provincial Offences Administration Building (08/2019) ► Terrace Lodge Redevelopment Project (detailed design underway) ► Port Bruce Bridge Replacement and Relocation of Temporary Bridge County Council ► Corporate and project-specific communication strategy needed (internal/external) ► Explore opportunities for enhanced support for constituent municipalities through shared services ► Enhanced accountability and transparency ► Informed decision making (focus on costs vs. risks vs. results) ' Mandatory vs. discretionary funding, with the goal of lowering costs ► Western Ontario Wardens Caucus initiatives Terrace Lodge Redevelopment Addition and Renovation Option i� i� POA Facility -- ----------- METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL WOOD SOFFIT OR METAL PANEL WHITE STONE VENEER STONE VENEER ALUMINUM PANEL(WOOD) DARK OPTION 1 � E1ginCounty +VGTHE ARCHITECTS EXTERIOR FINISHED 2018.03.22 Progressive by Nature VENTIN GROUP LTD Ongoing Projects ► Securing funding for Transit Feasibility Study (RED application) ► Services/Operational Review (efficiencies) ► Community Safety Plan (initial conversations with St. Thomas Police Service, Elgin Ontario Provincial Police and Aylmer Police Service) ► Recruitment and onboarding new Fire Trainer/Community Emergency Management Coordinator ► Municipal Tax Assessment Group (MTAG) ► Broadband (Southwestern Integrated Fibre Technology) 2019 and I Beyond Enhanced Service Offerings • What could the County do to better support your municipality? Contact Info Warden Duncan McPhail vvarden _elgin.ca 519-631 -1460 Julie Gonyou, Chief Administrative Officer/Clerk ;ao _elgin.c� 519-631 -1460 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL OFFICE 56169 Heritage Line, Straffordville, ON Council Chambers Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: MAYOR ED KETCHABAW DEPUTY MAYOR RAINEY WEISLER COUNCILLORS C. VALERIE DONNELL DANFROESE SUSAN CHILCOTT STAFF PRESENT: CAOICLERK PAUL SHIPWAY DEPUTY CLERK BRENDA GIBBONS DEPUTY CLERK I PLANNING COORDINATOR MARGARET UNDERHILL TREASURER LORNE JAMES ROAD OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR STEVE ADAMS MANGER OF CAPITAL PROJECTS WATER I WASTEWATER ED ROLOSON CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DRAINAGE SUPERINTENDENT BILL KNIFTON 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Ketchabaw called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF No disclosures of pecuniary interest were declared. 3. REVIEW OF ITEMS NOT LISTED ON AGENDA A. Ministry of Infrastructure re Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) update added as Item 11.1.1-I. 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Award Presentation - On February 26, 2019 at the annual Ontario Good Roads Association Conference Mr. Steve Adams, Road Operations Supervisor and Mr. Ed Roloson, Manager of Capital Projects I Water/Wastewater received the John Niedra Award for Innovative Service Delivery, Maintenance and Construction Activity for the Municipality of Bayham design and implementation of a custom, strategic digital knowledge management database with advanced automation and workflow capabilities deployed in the Municipality of Bayham Public Works Department. The Municipality of Bayham received the John Niedra Award alongside the City of Toronto and the City of Vaughan. 2019 Council Minutes March 21, 2019 B. Mayor Ketchabaw thanked Erie Shores Wind Farm for the generous donation which allowed Bayham Fire and Emergency Services to add a new outboard motor and accessories to the basic purchase of the new rescue craft along with a light bar that included navigation lights, a spot light, emergency lighting, as well as a marine radio. 5. DELEGATIONS A. 7:05 p.m. — OPP Inspector Bradley Fishleigh, Detachment Commander, Elgin County Detachment re Elgin County OPP 2018 Year End Report Moved by: Deputy Mayor Weisler Seconded by: Councillor Chilcott THAT the Elgin County OPP 2018 Year End Report as presented by OPP Inspector Bradley Fishleigh, Detachment Commander, Elgin County Detachment be received for information. CARRIED B. 7:30 p.m. — Susan Morrell Elgin County Library— Straffordville Library and Fred Bodsworth Library of Port Burwell re Presentation of"Updates and Reviews" for Straffordville and Port Burwell Libraries Moved by: Councillor Donnell Seconded by: Councillor Chilcott THAT the "Updates and Reviews" for Straffordville and Port Burwell Libraries as presented by Susan Morrell, Elgin County Library— Straffordville Library and Fred Bodsworth Library of Port Burwell be received for information. CARRIED 6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING(S) A. Regular Meeting held March 7, 2019 B. Public Meeting held March 7, 2019 re Municipality of Bayham Building By-Law Moved by: Councillor Donnell Seconded by: Deputy Mayor Weisler THAT the minutes of the Regular Meeting held March 7, 2019 and the Public Meeting held March 7, 2019 re Municipality of Bayham Building By-Law be adopted. CARRIED 7. MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF MOTION 8. RECREATION, CULTURE, TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8.1 Correspondence 8.1.1 Receive for Information 2 2019 Council Minutes March 21, 2019 8.1.2 Requiring Action 8.2 Reports to Council 9. PHYSICAL SERVICES — EMERGENCY SERVICES 9.1 Correspondence 9.1.1 Receive for Information 9.1.2 Requiring Action 9.2 Reports to Council 10. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSERVATION 10.1 Correspondence 10.1.1 Receive for Information A. Notice of Public Meeting re Proposed Zoning By-law amendment— Isaac & Maria Froese Moved by: Councillor Chilcott Seconded by: Deputy Mayor Weisler THAT correspondence item 10.1.1-A be received for information. CARRIED 10.1.2 Requiring Action 10.2 Reports to Council A. Report DS-18/19 by Bill Knifton, Chief Building Official IDrainage Superintendent re Petition for Drainage — Grewal Moved by: Deputy Mayor Weisler Seconded by: Councillor Donnell THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham acknowledges the filing with the Clerk of the Petition for drainage works from Mr. Nariender Grewal; THAT Report DS-18/19 regarding the petition for drainage and for drainage improvement be received; AND THAT Council wishes to proceed with this matter and appoints Spriet Associates, Engineers, to prepare a report on the proposed drainage area pursuant to Section 5 and Section 8(1) of the Drainage Act, for Council's consideration. CARRIED B. Report DS-20/19 by Bill Knifton, Chief Building Off iciallDrainage Superintendent re Branch 'B' of the Richmond Road Drain Award Contract Moved by: Councillor Chilcott Seconded by: Councillor Froese 3 2019 Council Minutes March 21, 2019 THAT Staff Report DS-20/19 regarding Branch B of the Richmond Road Drain Award Contract be received for information: THAT Council accept the tender for provision of drainage works set out in the Form of Tender for the Branch B of the Richmond Road Drain, as submitted by Froese Excavating, in the amount of$13,200+HST, with work to commence on or before May 1, 2019 and be completed on or before May 3, 2019; AND THAT By-Law 2019-023, being a by-law to authorize the execution of contract documents with Froese Excavating be presented to Council for enactment. CARRIED C. Report DS-19/19 by Margaret Underhill, Deputy ClerklPlanning Coordinator re Zoning Amendment Application — Nichols Zoning By-Law Z684-2019 Moved by: Councillor Froese Seconded by: Councillor Donnell THAT Staff Report DS-19/19 regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment for Nichols be received for information; AND THAT pursuant to Planning Act Regulations Bill 73 Smart Growth for our Communities Act, 2015, it be pointed out that at the public participation meeting held February 21, 2019 associated with this application, one written submission was received and later withdrawn and one written submission received after the public meeting and that all considerations regarding this matter were taken into account in Council's decision passing this resolution; AND THAT Zoning By-law Z456-2003, as amended, be further amended by changing the zoning from Agricultural (Al) Zone to a site-specific Rural Residential (RR-37) Zone on property identified as 53834 Vienna Line; AND THAT Zoning By-law Z684-2019 be presented to Council for enactment. CARRIED D. Report DS-21/19 by Margaret Underhill, Deputy ClerklPlanning Coordinator re Zoning Amendment Application — Bayham Zoning By-Law Z683-2019 Moved by: Councillor Donnell Seconded by: Deputy Mayor Weisler THAT Staff Report DS-21/19 regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment for the Municipality of Bayham be received for information; AND THAT pursuant to Planning Act Regulations Bill 73 Smart Growth for our Communities Act, 2015, it be pointed out that at the public participation meeting held February 21, 2019 associated with this amendment, no written submissions were received before or after the public meeting and that all considerations regarding this matter were taken into account in Council's decision passing this resolution; 4 2019 Council Minutes March 21, 2019 AND THAT Zoning By-law Z456-2003, as amended, be further amended by adding definitions and specific defined area regulations pertaining to cannabis cultivation and processing; AND THAT Zoning By-law Z683-2019 be presented to Council for enactment. CARRIED 11. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION 11.1 Correspondence 11.1.1 Receive for Information A. Notice re RFT 19-04 Port Burwell Pavilion B. Notice re Sale of Surplus Equipment C. Notice re Fire Department Appreciation Night held March 1, 2019 D. The Corporation of the Town of Saugeen Shores resolution re Recreation and Culture Infrastructure funding under the `Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program' E. Ontario Energy Board re Community Meeting for EPCOR Natural Gas Customers F. County of Elgin Council minutes of meeting held February 12, 2019 and draft minutes of meeting held March 12, 2019 G. County of Elgin re SWIFT Notice to Elgin's Constituent Municipalities H. City of Quinte West resolution re Bottled Water I. Ministry of Infrastructure re Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) update. Moved by: Councillor Chilcott Seconded by: Councillolr Donnell THAT correspondence items 11.1.1-A— 11.1.1-1 be received for information. CARRIED 11.1.2 Requiring Action A. EarlyON Child and Family Centre re Summer Programs in Straffordville and Port Burwell Moved by: Councillor Donnell Seconded by: Councillor Froese THAT correspondence from EarlyON Child and Family Centre — St. Thomas Elgin be received for information; AND THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham grants permission for the EarlyON Child and Family Centre— St. Thomas Elgin to use the Straffordville Community Centre, at the Community Partners rate and the Pavilion and Green Space on Wednesday, July 17, 2019 from 8:30 a.m. —2:00 p.m. for the Teddy Bear Picnic, the Port 5 2019 Council Minutes March 21, 2019 Burwell Library Pavilion Thursday mornings from 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. for the months of July and August and the Straffordville Pavilion Friday mornings from 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. for the months of July and August, subject to provision of liability insurance certificate in the minimum amount of$2,000,000.00 naming the Municipality of Bayham as additional insured; AND THAT the cleanup of the park area and pavilions be the responsibility of the organizers. CARRIED B. Museums Bayham Board Advisory Board & Committee Resolution re crosswalk and parking signage Moved by: Deputy Mayor Weisler Seconded by: Councillor Donnell THAT Museums Bayham Board Advisory Board & Committee Resolution be received for information; AND THAT the Pedestrian Crosswalk be referred to staff for analysis and report. CARRIED 11.2 Reports to Council A. Report TR-10/19 by Lorne James, Treasurer re 2019-2020 Operating Budget— Final Moved by: Deputy Mayor Weisler Seconded by: Councillor Donnell THAT Report TR-10/19 re 2019-2020 Operating Budget - Final be received for information; AND THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham direct staff to finalize the 2019 Budget incorporating the additional tax levy of$89,000 into the Operating Budget. AND THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham direct staff to bring forward the 2019 Capital Budget and 2019 Final Rates and Levies by-laws. CARRIED B. Report CAO-19/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re Project Ojibwa Moved by: Councillor Donnell Seconded by: Councillor Chilcott THAT Report CAO-19/19 re Project Ojibwa be received for information; AND THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham direct Report CAO- 19/19 re Project Ojibwa be posted on the municipal website. CARRIED 6 2019 Council Minutes March 21, 2019 C. Report CAO-20/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re Vienna Memorial Park Moved by: Councillor Donnell Seconded by: Councillor Froese THAT Report CAO-20/19 re Vienna Memorial Park be received for information; AND THAT Council direct staff proceed with works as outlined within Report CAO-20/19. CARRIED D. Report CAO-21/19 by Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk re Port Burwell Library Moved by: Councillor Chilcott Seconded by: Deputy Mayor Weisler THAT Report CAO-21/19 re Port Burwell Library be received for information; AND THAT Council direct staff to move forward with the work plan presented in Report CAO-21/19. CARRIED 12. BY-LAWS A. By-Law No. 2019-010 Being a Provisional by-law to provide for drainage works in the Municipality of Bayham in the County of Elgin known as the Branch `B' of the Richmond Road Drain (This by-law follows the recommendation in Report DS-08119 by Bill Knifton, Chief Building Officiall Drainage Superintendent during the public meeting of February 7, 2019) Third and Final Reading B. By-Law No. 2019-023 Being a by-law to authorize the execution of an agreement between the Municipality of Bayham and Froese Excavating Ltd. for the provision of drainage works for the Richmond Road Drain Branch `B' in the Municipality of Bayham pursuant to provisions of the Drainage Act, Chapter D.17 R.S.O. 1990 as amended (This by-law follows the recommendation in Report DS-20119 by Bill Knifton, Chief Building Officiall Drainage Superintendent during the regular meeting of March 21, 2019) C. By-Law No. 2019-024 Being a by-law to regulate building construction, demolition, change of use permits, septic systems, sewer connection permits and inspections and to repeal By-Law No. 2014-120, as amended (This by-law follows the resolution passed during the public meeting of March 7, 2019) D. By-Law No. 2019-025 Being a by-law to establish and require the payment of fees for information, services, activities and use of municipal property and to repeal By-Law No. 2016-059 and all amendments (This by-law follows the resolution passed during the public meeting of March 7, 2019) E. By-Law Z683-2019 Being a by-law to amend By-Law No. Z456-2003, as amended (This by-law follows the recommendation in Report DS-21119 by Margaret Underhill, Deputy Clerkj Planning Coordinator during the regular meeting of March 21, 2019) 7 2019 Council Minutes March 21, 2019 F. By-Law No. Z684-2019 Being a by-law to amend By-Law No. Z456-2003, as amended (This by-law follows the recommendation in Report DS-19119 by Margaret Underhill, Deputy Clerkl Planning Coordinator during the regular meeting of March 21, 2019) Moved by: Councillor Chilcott Seconded by: Councillor Donnell THAT By-Law No. 2019-010 be read a third time and finally passed; AND THAT By-Law No. 2019-023, 2019-024, 2019-025, Z683-2019 and Z684-2019 be read a first, second and third time and finally passed. CARRIED 13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 14. OTHER BUSINESS 14.1 In Camera 14.2 Out of Camera 15. BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF COUNCIL A. By-Law No. 2019-026 Being a by-law to confirm all actions of Council Moved by: Councillor Chilcott Seconded by: Councillor Donnell THAT Confirming By-Law No. 2019-026 be read a first, second and third time and finally passed CARRIED 16. ADJOURNMENT Moved by: Councillor Donnell Seconded by: Councillor Chilcott THAT the Council meeting be adjourned at 8:42 p.m. CARRIED MAYOR CLERK 8 $AY REPORT FIRE DEPARTMENT 4 O�pol'tunity Is 0� 5 TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Randy White, Fire Chief DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: FR-02/19 SUBJECT: AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Municipality of Bayham entered into Automatic Aid Agreements with both the Township of South West Oxford (SWOX) and the Town of Tillsonburg (Bylaw No. 2010-080 and 2010-079 respectively). In predefined areas at the north end of Bayham, either SWOX or Tillsonburg Fire Departments are dispatched at the same time as the Municipality of Bayham Fire Department. The Automatic Aid Agreements specify what type of calls are to be responded to (medical, motor vehicle collision MVC, fire, or rescue) and by what apparatus (pumper and/or rescue). Rates are as established by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. The intent of an Automatic Aid Agreement is to ensure the provision of an initial response to fires, rescues and emergencies that may occur in a part of a Municipality where a Fire Department in another Municipality is capable of responding more quickly than the Fire Department situated in the subject Municipality. DISCUSSION: From 2014-2018 there have been 45 Automatic Aid calls. These calls resulted in approximately 89 apparatus hours. The recent increase in call volume has resulted in Bayham Fire also seeing an increase in Automatic Aid calls, especially medical assists. The response data and outside Fire Department interactions recorded for the past 5 years has enabled staff to execute an overall review of the effectiveness of the Automatic Aid Agreements. YEAR SWOX TILLSONBURG 2014 1 0 2015 0 1 2016 8 3 2017 9 5 2018 11 7 The map, attached hereto as Appendix `A' outlines the SWOX and Tillsonburg response zones in the Municipality of Bayham. Annotated on the map are the locations of Automatic Aid incidents. SWOX AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT The SWOX Automatic Aid Agreement call assessment is as follows: Medical MVC Misc. . Fire Total Calls 12 12 3 2 Automatic Aid Not 6 7 2 0 Required Automatic Aid First on 2 2 0 2 Scene or Utilized Unknown - Not recorded 4 3 1 0 The one MVC that SWOX arrived ahead of the Municipality of Bayham occurred at the intersection of Culloden Rd. and Pressey Rd., the closest point to the SWOX Fire Department in Brownsville. Based on the analysis of the 2014-2018 SWOX Automatic Aid Agreement calls it is respectfully recommended to reduce the current SWOX Automatic Aid Agreement Zone to include only that area from Pressey Road. south to Best Line. East and west boundaries would remain unchanged. TILLSONBURG AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT The Tillsonburg Automatic Aid Agreement call assessment is as follows: Medical MVC Misc. Fire Total Calls 7 6 1 2 Automatic Aid Not 4 1 0 0 Required Automatic Aid First on 3 3 1 2 Scene or Utilized Unknown - Not recorded 0 2 0 0 Based on the analysis of the 2014-2018 Tillsonburg Automatic Aid Agreement calls it is respectfully recommended to remove the portion of the current Automatic Aid Agreement south of Best Line. For both SWOX and Tillsonburg, an explanation for the relative differences in response time is that both departments generally have their members respond first to the Fire Station, then when the apparatus is staffed, it responds to the scene. While this is the preferred method of volunteer response, it is not practical at Municipality of Bayham Station 2 - Straffordville due to the small number of volunteers that live close to the Fire Station. Instead, the apparatus is taken by the first one or two members, the remainder respond direct to the scene. The proposed amendments to the Automatic Aid Agreements ensure effective allocation of resources will still maintaining current levels of service. RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT Report FR-02/19 re: Automatic Aid Agreement Assessment be received for information; 2. AND THAT Council direct staff to bring forward a bylaw to amend the Automatic Aid Agreements with the Township of South West Oxford and the Town of Tillsonburg, as outlined with Report FR-02/19, for Council consideration. Respectfully Submitted by: Reviewed by: Randy White Paul Shipway Fire Chief/By-law Officer CAOICIerk Municipality of Bayham - Fire Zones `� BAYS Not Required Automatic Aid First on Scene/Requir Unknown-Not Recorded leEesE+ j „h>W^° " � �e"leaf ��pe �lENlby i vree9er w 8 a BaStn2(TILL) Bayham Fire Department a Tillsonburg '` �e,IWE a •• E BaStn2(SWOX) CNlylyq s3 Bayham Fire Department Brownsville ccuea lwe BaStn2 e N�f Bayham Fire Department ■eeN Station#2-Straffordville eaE"Er� elllNly� e EnEN 4 ll+E Eq"U"E EOENIp� a EReeelpE d 91 S s NaNl.11�E t � NOTOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING CONCERNING A PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT n2A IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM Aouniq APPLICANT: ISAAC AND MARIA FROESE TAKE NOTICE that the Municipality of Bayham has received a complete application for a Zoning By-law amendment. AND TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham will hold a public meeting on Thursday, April 4th, 2019 at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers, 56169 Heritage Line, Straffordville to consider a proposed Zoning By-law amendment under Section 34 of the PLANNING ACT. THE PURPOSE of this By-law is to change the zoning regulations on the 71 ha (176 acres) retained lot from an Agricultural (Al) zone to a Special Agricultural (A2) zone; and to change the 1.2 ha (2.99 acres) of severed lands from an Agricultural (Al) zone to a site-specific Rural Residential (RR-XX) Zone in Zoning By-law Z456-2003. Consent application E92/18 will be heard on March 20t", 2019 and approval is anticipated. The new residential lot is created surplus to a consolidated farm operation. The retained lands are located at 10909 Plank Road, on the west side of Plank Road, north of Maple Grove Line. THE EFFECT of this By-law will be to fulfil two conditions of consent. Firstly, to recognize zero lot frontage, for access via right-of-way, for the severed lands and, secondly, to change the retained lands to an A2 Zone in order to prohibit residential development. ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make a written or verbal representation in support of or in opposition to the proposed amendment. IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to the Municipality of Bayham before the by-law is passed, the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision of the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY does not make oral submissions at a public meeting, or make written submissions to the Municipality of Bayham before the by-law is passed, the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to do so. IF YOU WISH to be notified of the adoption of the proposed amendment, you must make a written request to the undersigned. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed amendment may be obtained at the Municipal Office. Dated at the Municipality of Bayham this 15th day of March 2019. KEY MAP Margaret Underhill Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator [ MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM [ Municipality of Bayham 56169 Heritage Line, PO Box 160 Straffordville, ON, NOJ 1Y0 L-- T: 519-866-5521 Ext 222 F: 519-866-3884 E: munderhill(a�bavham.on.ca W: www.bayham.on.ca I CIS, -- SUBJECT LANDS Aft 1 ,1 l 'REEN LINE T W s ORINTH EST LINE 0 P i E i-n'' Z' CARS - °N LIN19 ... �� ORTH ",vGs EN LINE J li HALL x O <: : lu 44 57°24 U 0 < F J �I SHApY EDEN 52s37 :y":`,. LANE ;I^ .` €€Ey l _ uE , 1 - C9 .EE OTTERGgTE LINE BgLD ::e WIN LINE . . �.. CL U E ° gPLE GROVE t N kb 4g/ z 3� LINE ro� INCE FE; Do m S,q GAO q<<LINE >O I 1°W LINE ;3 L\N iCN•L.ON �P \�C, �F� N O Lq F ki`ij iiSiii<i � y pe Rlp ki�� i a I0 a c ¢p 38 5612 °` \�PGE 38 J 3 4 J p m x W v W [3 ?<'€ 43, MSTRAFF DVi LE 6 5 W C U z ¢ ✓gCkS z p 52 HERS LINE o � Y O 5/i0> °NL/n/ ¢ x Ei M 126,17 a:; is 's?s0 a II 0:: li D ac CALT O y \ o c ❑ c ALTON N 4 U'p 52651 pgi€ `353481 45 z ¢ s 4pL/IyF Flo O Z i:.? p O ii 1 Z Q zLU Lo a o x'<;: € o II p d J sus U € CO Eli M n: ii o CQU V. w Ld Q F 45 ^E i IL I SN' � O a S8395 2521 U mi€ pL v558j 14 \5 IV, L/N M\N cH�TE VGHT a�. ' s F 41 frig 3 0 LAKEVIEW c p p p VIENNA 5jA29 :: : iEu U Q 52661 Q 0 \ n °49i7�/p Z \ og4381 436° Z SCOTr J p TVi �OF ¢ A L/N 42 c N C/y yA/t �GF'0 Z Q W I Ne is _X e 19 v } I€ 50 ~ uzz 0 s09>c LFNFRrF ° 55 39 42O c c L/NF a PROVINCIAL PARK tL S>g. �P RT BURWELL �5�°RF S�B� �,AYIi PLANNING ACT NOTICE OF THE PASSING OF ,- ZONING BY-LAW Z683-2019 BY appo�unity).5�°'tt� THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM APPLICANT: MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed By- Law No. Z683-2019 on the 21st day of March 2019 under Section 34 of THE PLANNING ACT. AND TAKE NOTICE that any person or agency may appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in respect of the By-law by filing with the Clerk of the Municipality of Bayham not later than the 11th day of April 2019 a notice of appeal setting out the objection to the By-law and the reasons in support of the objection. THE PURPOSE of this By-law amendment is to recognize the legalization of the cultivation of cannabis for recreational use by adding definitions for cannabis cultivation and processing related uses; and to add specific regulations in the Rural Industrial zone and Urban Industrial Zone to require a zone change to permit cannabis cultivation and processing use as a site-specific use. The proponent of such a use shall have a legally valid license and be regulated to operate in accordance with the applicable Federal and Provincial statutes. No key map is provided as the proposed amendment applies to the entire Municipality. THE EFFECT of this By-law will be to allow for the cannabis cultivation and cannabis processing use in appropriate zones. ONLY INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS AND PUBLIC BODIES may appeal a by-law to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. A notice of appeal may not be filed by an unincorporated association or group. However, a notice of appeal may be filed in the name of an individual who is a member of the association or the group on its behalf. NO PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY SHALL be added as a party to the hearing of the appeal unless, before the by-law was passed, the person or public body made oral submissions at a public meeting or written submissions to the council or, in the opinion of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to add the person or public body as a party. The complete By-law is available for inspection in the municipal office during regular office hours. DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM THIS 22"d DAY OF MARCH 2O19. Margaret Underhill Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator Municipality of Bayham 56169 Heritage Line, P.O. Box 160. Straffordville, ON, NOJ 1Y0 T: 519-866-5521 Ext 222 F: 519-866-3884 E: munderhill(&-bayham.on.ca NOTE: The fee for filing an objection or appeal of a Zoning By-law to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal is presently set at$300.00 by the Province of Ontario. BAY PLANNING ACT NOTICE OF THE PASSING OF ZONING BY-LAW Z684-2019 BY o {s THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM A�O�'unity Ise°� APPLICANT: NICHOLS, 53834 Vienna Line TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed By- Law No. Z684-2019 on the 21st day of March 2019 under Section 34 of THE PLANNING ACT. AND TAKE NOTICE that any person or agency may appeal to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal in respect of the By-law by filing with the Clerk of the Municipality of Bayham not later than the 11th day of April 2019 a notice of appeal setting out the objection to the By-law and the reasons in support of the objection. THE PURPOSE of this By-law is to change the zoning on a 12,141 m2 (3 acres) parcel of land from an Agricultural (Al)zone to a site-specific Rural Residential (RR-37)zone to permit a kennel in addition to the main residential use, in Zoning By-law Z456-2003. The change is to allow for the operation of kennel in the form of an animal rescue facility with a maximum of thirty(30) small animals at one time in addition to the residential dwelling use. The animals are kept in a 24 m2 (262 ft2) accessory building and a fenced area located centrally on the lot and clients visit the site to adopt the domesticated animals. The subject lands are located at 53834 Vienna Line, north side, west of Woodworth Road. THE EFFECT of this By-law will be to allow an animal rescue facility to house and care for a maximum of thirty (30) small animals, sheltered in an existing building and retain the existing dwelling. ONLY INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS AND PUBLIC BODIES may appeal a by-law to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. A notice of appeal may not be filed by an unincorporated association or group. However, a notice of appeal may be filed in the name of an individual who is a member of the association or the group on its behalf. NO PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY SHALL be added as a party to the hearing of the appeal unless, before the by-law was passed, the person or public body made oral submissions at a public meeting or written submissions to the council or, in the opinion of the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to add the person or public body as a party. The complete By-law is available for inspection in the municipal office during regular office hours. DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM THIS 22"d DAY OF MARCH 2O19. KEY MAP MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM Margaret Underhill Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator Municipality of Bayham 56169 Heritage Line, P.O. Box 160 Straffordville, ON, NOJ 1Y0 T: 519-866-5521 Ext 222 SUBJECT LANDS F: 519-866-3884 E: munderhill(cD_bayham.on.ca VN� NOTE: The fee for filing an objection or appeal of a Zoning By-law to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal is presently set at$300.00 by the Province of Ontario. g,AY REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES tunity Is TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Bill Knifton, Chief Building Official, Drainage Superintendent DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: DS-22/19 FILE NO. SUBJECT: SOPER ROAD DRAIN BACKGROUND: On May 1, 2017 the Clerk received a petition for drainage from a group of landowners who reside on Light Line and Soper Road in the Village of Vienna. On May 18,2017, Council appointed Spriet Associates to make an examination of the drainage area and prepare a report for Council's consideration. DISCUSSION: An onsite meeting was held with the Engineer, Drainage Superintendent and landowners. Shortly thereafter the Engineer began the design of a drainage works to achieve the required legal outlet for the lands in question. Engineer's Report# 217121 received from Spriet Associates dated March 18, 2019 was filed with the Clerk on March 21, 2019. Council should now determine whether it wishes to proceed with Notices under the Drainage Act and direct the Clerk to send a copy of the Report and Notice of Public Meeting setting out the date of the Council meeting at which this report will be considered to: (a) Every landowner within the area requiring drainage. (b) Clerk of every other local municipality in which any land or road that is assessed for the drainage works, or for which compensation or other allowances have been provided in the report is situate. (c) Any public utility, railway company or road authority that may be affected. (d) Long Point Region Conservation Authority. (e) The Ministry of Natural Resources. (d) The Director, of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report DS-22/19 regarding the Soper Road Drain be received for information; 2. THAT the Council of the Municipality of Bayham acknowledges the receipt of Report #217121 dated March 18, 2019 for the Soper Road Drain, as prepared by Spriet Associates, and filed with the Clerk on March 21, 2019; 3. THAT Council set a date for the Public Meeting to be held on April 18, 2019 at 8:00 pm to consider the Report; 4. AND THAT Staff be directed to mail a Notice of Public Meeting and Report to all persons assessed to this drainage works in accordance with the Drainage Act. Respectfully Submitted by: /F"' Z,�L Bill Knifton a S ipway Chief Building Official CAO Drainage Superintendent Long Point Region Conservation Authority LPRCA Media Release Long Point Region Amended Source Protection Plan Approved Tillsonburg, Ontario - March 27, 2019 - Updates to the plan that protects the sources of municipal drinking water in the Long Point Region have been approved by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Long Point Region Conservation Authority (LPRCA) announced today. "The approval of the Source Protection Plan amendments is another important step in the continuing protection of municipal drinking water sources across the Long Point Region," said LPRCA Chair, Mike Columbus. The amended Long Point Region Source Protection Plan and Assessment Report were approved by Minister Rod Phillips on March 11, 2019 and took effect March 25, 2019. Some highlights of the amended assessment report include new or revised groundwater protection areas within Norfolk County; and the addition of a protection zone for nitrates within the Municipality of Bayham. Significant amendments to the source protection plan include the establishment of water quantity policies for the Simcoe water supply and policies to reduce nitrate concentrations within the Richmond drinking water system. An Environmental Registry of Ontario posting has a summary of the amendments: https:Hero.ontario.ca/notice/013-4630 The source protection plan is a local science-based plan designed to protect the water quality and quantity of the local lakes, rivers, and aquifers that supply municipal drinking water systems. Within the plan are a variety of policies, programs, and actions to eliminate or manage potential risks to municipal drinking water sources. Amendments to the plan were based on technical studies, collaborative policy development, and public consultation. The process was guided by the Lake Erie Region Source Protection Committee, which includes municipal, agricultural, business, industry, public interest, and First Nations representatives. "The many stakeholders involved throughout the plan update process should be proud of their work and this achievement." said Wendy Wright-Cascaden, Chair of the Lake Erie Source Protection Committee. The source water protection plan has been prepared under the Clean Water Act, 2006; with funding provided by the Province. Conservation authorities provided technical and administrative support for plan development; in conjunction with municipalities. The amended plan and assessment report are available at www.sourcewater.ca For further information contact LPRCA General Manager Judy Maxwell at 519-842-4242 ext 225. -30- Hannah Weber, Marketing Coordinator 519-842-4242 ext 227 REPORT CAO 40 ortunity ism0 TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAOIClerk DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: CAO-22/19 SUBJECT: CAPITAL ITEM NO. PR-2 PORT BURWELL SHED — PAVILION CONVERSION BACKGROUND: On June 21, 2018, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report CAO-52/18 re Ontario Trillium Foundation — Capital Stream be received for information; AND THAT staff be directed to make application to the Ontario Trillium Fund — Capital Stream for the Port Burwell Shed — Pavilion Conversion as outlined within Report CAO 52/18. On October 1, 2018, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report TR-13/18 re 2019-2028 Capital Budget— Draft be received for information; AND THAT Council approve in principle the 2019-2028 Capital Budget. The 2019 Capital Budget includes Capital Item No. PR-2 Port Burwell Shed — Pavilion Conversion in the amount of$155,000 ($130,000 Grant, $25,000 Parks & Playground Reserve). On January 18, 2019, the Ontario Trillium Foundation advised the Municipality of Bayham it was successful in Capital Grant Application No. CP10401 in the amount of$130,000 for the Port Burwell Shed — Pavilion Conversion Project. DISCUSSION Capital Item No. PR-2 consists of three components of work: 1) Removal and relocation of existing electrical service. a. The existing electrical within the Port Burwell Shed controls the ball diamond lighting. Koolen Electric will remove and upgrade the electrical service from the Port Burwell Shed and place the same in a secure outside panel, which will provide improved secure access for ball diamond users. b. Koolen Electric has provided a quote of$18,500+HST to complete the works 2) Port Burwell Shed Demolition a. Underhill Trucking has provided a quote of$8,875+HST to complete the works. 3) Pavilion Construction a. The results of RIFT 19-04 Port Burwell Pavilion are as follows: BIDDER BID PRICE Franklin Construction $115,315.85+HST Elgin Contracting $199,000+HST Reid & Deleye $173,100+HST PK Construction $152,690+HST SDI Builders 2010 $167,900+HST b. Tender Design, Engineering and Project Management costs are $8,800+HST. The Municipal Engineer reviewed the bids and confirms the bid of Franklin Construction as the low bid and the only bid, which permits the project to be completed within the approved budgeted amount. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-22/19 re Capital Item No. PR-2 Port Burwell Shed — Pavilion Conversion be received for information; 2. AND THAT Council direct staff to move forward with the work plan presented in Report CAO-22/19. 3. AND THAT staff be directed to bring forward a by-law to enter into an agreement with Franklin Construction to construct the Port Burwell Pavilion pursuant to RIFT 19-04 for Council consideration. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul Shipway CAOIClerk 9� A. Fl a WA BEwW z --- " LJ FE FOR LJ € ON II GTE PRD FDDFlxO t FIND-1 `N ; FND-I _ (519)avDs aov3 R N RA,FOO KU °(�519A)23n,2.0A2.1 IxD COM RFERFLRa REFER FLOOR ; PRIGUID FFLOORLOOR P'LADOOR.1 oD�NUOU centric MN IIA SBINQ / APT REP.o°EDDR IT(BYO ERs, ,..,E.o x..., I/— MD_I GR SLNB CONSTIM-0. "REE——— CR `E R i11OPE TOIc1.1 To GRAl I $ m a wxu .rec x.nm Du5) Loon DRAIN LOCH I � a 6 D`w R�D.Rx"�R. «.O ARAR_WA CONCRETE SLAB ON FL..N GR SLaB CONS1RUCnO DN00R FLOOR AT DOOR OPErvIrvG PIEa 3 j PINONCRETE FR DxG r� ou rx fee D A q CONCRETE Y/.,A6 wE M. 3if A AWCUT SLA6 o t2-0 o.cl c/w SA—T N, DATE REVISION 1 2019/02/21 ISSUED FOR PERMIT �1 FOUNDATION PLAN ROOF PLAN ALE:1/4'=1-o cAiE:I/<•=I-D ITIUSBED ROGF CONSTRUCTION- - - >RCORRUGAlEO MET.LRSSHEATHING RI CORRUGATER METALRSHEaTNH NC R2 C RFUGA EO METAL sHEATHwG R' �-WOOD STRAPPING®I2'IO"o.c. 2xo WOGO STRAPPING®2'-0'o.c 5€5 >6LUESKINTROOFING MEMBRANE i > EANI PLYWOOD SIFEaTMIN�E OOD SHEATHING PRE-ENGINEERED"1� PLYWOOD SHEATHING wos uE uoW PR-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES PRE-ENGINEERED SCISSOR ROOF > ROOF TRUSSES +0 +e 24 TRUSSES®2A'o c ®2q"o c R —- (2),I, i^X"LYt - -—- ® 015'aFB EC1A REINFORCED >0075 PLASTIC PA SD SHEATHINGED >%LASTIC PANELS oA.S SHEATHINGED b XW- EXW- GOge5D525 COwury wCAP >PLASTIC PANELS a ONnN0005 2.6 TOP "FIBREGLASS REINFORCED REINFORC PLATE-FASTEN TO P OF TRUSSES rz�MASONRY WALL w/5" OF TRUSSES V Ei�. DIA.ANCHORS.(8" 4 E- STORAGE ROOM B EMBEDMENT+2"HOOK) 0 - WHERE SOFFIT BUTfS UP TO P T A L w?Jy' GFu"T FAQ IT L ENSURE THE PRF-Fl HEO NTED ALUM SAS(BNRo HE SO =PlNc°<:aACIA BOARD zAa Dui o _ MBEDMEN DE �.i �H 3'O'E EXT RIROR WALL UCT ON gV CONCFLAT FEIERBLOBUTTE ,ENSUSRE TO �� 2 COURSE BOND BEAM 0)oMS oHrIH°Dos aARw 6noNCRETE aLCCC`l WALL 6q PORT BURWELL E SOFFIT SACE IDi(irP.) °/w(I)10" (1)COURSE BOND BEAM=/M(1)10M PAVILION AND PUBLIC kp caxnxuous BAR WASHROOM THE z (EXTEND 12s vnsraovEwxc)E 5546,NOVA SCOTIA LINE PORT c0u5iRUC ON-Exwt BURWELL,ONTARO >8"CONCRETE BLOCK W PRINT GATE: FEB.21.2019 —ELAB FACED.PAINTED LLOW » � GROUT OM(2) )KCOURSES 6 M as METAL DOOR AND FRAMEO(TYP.) DATE: FEB.21,Z019 RECESS TOP OF FOUNDATION L Y PROVIDE NRY BL . CONCRETE SLAB ON WALL e"BELOW t/o OF CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE14-1 DRAWN BY: J.D.G. / -T VERTICAL(OW£L®ifi oL�"w/ GRADE COuBTRUCTION FNISHED FLOOR CONSTRUCTION €I�J VERStyL WId MI M q CONCRETE Rooa CONTINUOUS FL H CONCRETE FLOOR g CHECKED BY: G'R EXW7 G01 E H-1 N.2q"F EEDMENT INTO M nz 6 W W M DOOR OPENING OORAPOURRAi >MxNx% l FOUNDATON WALL I "COMPACTED 6'R COMPACTED 5CALE: SON G RE M w/ ELEV.DOUONDAT10N WALL GRANULAR ILL �,1/o FOUNDATION WALL _ ^ ILL T, ASSUMED FINISHED GRAD R —_ ()I-"xaX�LYt - GOgeSDSE.B C CAP — V E V.0-D — PROJECT No.: 19-0124 ———I EN-SA 31y" Ve.o Vau L ———rv—a— war_ --,tT————=^— —— FOUNDATION WALL-FNDI FOUNDATION WALL-FNDI LL a"aE.W"R _ MEM RANE OF DAMPPROOFING � PLANS AND CONCRETE FoonNCRE DAM?P0�"IED i°NCRAN CONCRETTE i"oonN - >Ts- IG DGo"C. WALL$E�'T��N$ xOTE6 FOUNDATION A FOUNDATION A AlF q Hs w/ A. tau POSTS TO B au2 w/9uvsOry SmOrvc FOOnUSE ARE DO BE FOAL SODL CONCRETE STRIP FOOnN FOOnrvDS ARE DO BE NAT FOUNDER SOIL CONCRETE STRIP IN US 2.FA6hH E 22 x6 tlp.CONTINUWS 22 x6 tlp.CONTINUOUS DIP t/o PIBi2>'IEIIU%D/a CONCRETE 4AB AND UN ILU E U UN NR E U ON ON }vDUR SLAB DYER VIER AND NODD vOST(rn.) �,GROUND FLOOR PLAN �A,WALL SECTION �g,WALL SECTION s A2.1 €.+.I SCALE:t/q"-t'-0" .+./SCALE:1/2"-t'-0" .+.I SCALE:I/2"-1'-0" OIAIG'C'LAP SPLICE 9� �7lPo COLECO HEAVY DUTY EXTEND AND PROVIDE waTERSTGP AA//PIE- (COLouRISTEE BE DETERMNEFU iW om } 1Y�'k314'KEYwaY ZRE-THISHLI VL _ CER GRMEXTERIOR NUM TRIM NUM ALUMNUM IC/w EAVESTROUGH OFFIN AND ASCIASIBLE FAPO ED`�OWNEW IS 0 FOR"IMAI`TLOP JhIBOTTNUXNEPT LU. W5R5TRUSSES_ (COLOUR TO BE DETERMINED) TERwL Ex S rvLY waiER LEADER,DRAIN MSNIMMO COMPIRESM 1 iER10R FACE ROUGH THE JOINT �� -RAII WOOD POST(REFER i0 PLANS) INTO CRUSHED STONE PIT F WIDTH OF EXCAVATIONE BELOW CONCRETE STRIP " Ll ASUO T I' (X)FOR SERNC g RRIER-FOU CURSE OF CON FOOTING EXCEEDS UL FOR STEP FOOTING SO STRIP),INFORM ORMPASSES BELOW a RATTOIeD oNT NIA w'irz DRINKNO Ml"T:D BLOCK SP T-FACE DE SERVICE SE D TAIL FOR TYPICAL STEP FOORN NFOR CENTRIC IHo CIE TO BE TO OBE ON�NIERIOR S ENGINEERING OF SERVICES WHICHOP SS BELOW CONCRETE Ne(slwzn a0n o 2n u6l w AIPAFACE BLOCK IP GOSERNC INTERIOR FACE DWI OCONCROPRE E SLABPIER A AND E POUR LOW GLAB m CK(OLOUR RE OCATE SERVICES TO AVUR CONFLICT WITI PAD FOp11NG,pR LOWFR EPAD OVER PELE,IER AND WOOD POST(TYP.) TO BE DETERMINED) 2 FOOT GE BELOW EXRVICESON FOR 0 r'S 1 FOUNDATION_WALL suMED A EM NTREQUIREMENTS rvGRETE BLDQ�'Y,r D SCHEDULES FOR REINFORCEMENT F.AND FOUNDATION WALL centric p p� _ _ IFIIISIED GRADE 3 PLnNREACH SIDE OF STRIP FOOTING GR LEAN CONCRETE A DIMEN51 xO SISESUU` (cent S811iQ I- TYPICAL DETAIL �,TYPICAL DETAIL „a����..,E.o�...., RMEIER s IL BE 'ADOf..TNG PER FouNDanoN WALL'FND-I' " WALE:n.T s. SERVICES BELOW STRIP FOOIINc /SCALE:N.TS VERTICAL CONTROL JOINTS IN FOUNDATION WALLS$ o"m+.u'.w•a+ur�ree.u�+++v SoID SEEDED.TOP OF FNISHED a TO PLANS) \•% USE TABLE STANDARD HEOR FROM THE SLAB SLAS AND SHALL SLOPE AWAYC 7 C C 7 LAI SPLICE IN IDE RM maAlc, EN d� n.,onq �j1 SIDE ELEVATION LE EODIBEuy o ____ I Om 16" 3 26„ coy Reellenum�wd GB�ARCH1iEciwe. AT 1i o_ROOFV _ _ _ _ KCYwAr ICAL)JgN IASLL 25M ce aN mN A ELE.IS-9 wa 0"ttP. (TUP YP u 6'x C GABLE VENT C/w ^ 30M 56' BUG SCREEN w nl 6 2 �6 PER TO PLANS AND SCHEDULES R € CORNER INTERSECTION 'T'INTERSECTION OTRDNFORONG STEEL REOUIREMENTERE- Fa TRUSSES ALUMIFINIIGHSOFFED VENTED FASCIA 1NOTVERTICAL BARS CMITIED FOR CLARITY-REFER TO FOUNDATON PLAN AND SCHEDULES FOR REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS AND FOUNDATION WALL SIZES No. DATE REVISION V 8' `- - - - TRIM A/w EAVESTROUGH 2. CONSiRUCIION JOINTS IN FOUNDATION WALLS REWIRE WATERSTOPS WHERE SUB ON GRADE Is LOWER THAN EXTERIOR GRADE(SEE TYPICAL DETAIL) D (COLOUR TO BE DETERMINED) E 1Ti"AE"KECONSTRUCTION2019/02/21 ISSUED FOR PERMIT INIATER LEADER IN NwN,U1 LEA ITCHE�A;" �TYPICAL DETAIL INiO TYPIOC H-NDCWG TO BE w BLOCK,SPLIT-FACECE 3 COURSES OF CONCRETE ALE.N.T.S. HORIZONTAL NS g FIXED PAINTER DOUBLE AIR p CONCRETE BLOCK(COLOUR WALLS AT CORNERS AND NTERSECR B ZING(+PRIVACY FILM) e F TO BE DETERMINED) NOTES: S SAw CUT DEPTH-1/5 T' UHSE CRE OR THE OTHER DETAIL AS THE CONTROL J T WHERE INDICATED THUS Cl'' ON t/*_FOUNDATION WALL_ OR Ix` z. Aw cull MUST BE COMPLETED WTHI"6 To is HOURS of POURING CONCRETE 0 3. AFIERLSLAB HAS CURED FOR ONE MONTH,REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM SAW CUT JOINTS 3 " AID FILL w/MORTAR CONTAINING CEMENT,SAID,AND A LATEX BONDING AGENT OR AS E No- PERT �TOyNNATIONAWALL'FNO-I' )< OISCONRrvVE W.W.F. REINSS'INSTATE.,DPROE MAXI.L.SPACING p SOU`E ROLLEDD BEYOND REINFORCEMENT 3"EACHAND A SPACING. JOINTS b SNAG IANO`RONSHALA SLOPEOAwaY --------------- SIDE F JONT SLAI HI SLAB (nGRADE SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIED SAWCUT JOINT p FROM THE sLAe FIRST POUR I SECOND POUR P �,REAR ELEVATION PRIOR To°s CONDDI`POUR 5. GA CUT EAB—oN—sRABB ARUND COLUMNS AS INDICATED Ere—OTHER PATwRG MAY BE 9 .../SCALE:t/a'-t'-O" MUST SUBMITTED `% LL'w COLUMN � PORT BURWELL Olsc NnNUE w.w.F. PAVILION AND PUBLIC •,1/*_ROOF _ _ _ _ _ 11 F Janrr 3^EACH WASHROOM �ELEV IS'-B' u"DID.SCREEN VENT c/w POURED JOINT p 5540 NOVA SCOTER LINE PORT IND BURWELL,ONTARIO AUSIGDIO AND NM AL ALERT - 6r 6 BE DETERMIED)pa�"ro �7,TYPICAL DETAIL PRINT DATE: Fee.zI,zolo FACE BLOCKOrvO E SCALE:N.T.S. CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE FLOOR SUB p THOU B J 3 3 L $ DATE: FEB.21,ZO 19 s_OF TRUSSES 12 z -N DRAWN BY: J.D.C. suP M LU IN M SO DENTED ELEv.a-D 1 2 ALUMINUM SOFFIT AND FASCIA '�` / STOP TRIM"w EAeESTRouGH HORIZONTAL WALL WOOD POST(REFER i0 PLANS) ( CUR TO BE DETERMINED))E. -/SIC _ _ \ SCAEDU EPFOGSFORGING AT CONTROL CHECKED BY CCL -I_-U € rvED II cE MAE_G uS Gxrza R REI -REFER To-FACED, AINTED H B O�KR SPL�F AOE SIDE MASONRY REINFORCING(REFER A � SCALE: METAL DOOR AND FRAME L F C To"'CAL OETAR) ND � iO BE ON INTERIOR \ R DETAILS PROJECT NO.: 19-0124 RRTER-FREE DRINKING CONCRETE BLOCK(COLOUR OUTSIDE FACE - - - - FOUN ON SUP-FACE BLOCK O I TO BE DETERMINED)ON A �.i/._FOUNDATION WALL_ _ _ ASSUMED tl" ELEVATIONS �- 0 O FINISHED GRADE BACKER ROD BEHIND SEALANT R°NF000`CN„'"pc`ORES ETHER AND DETAILS OOPOVE E/TE SLAB a"BELOW t/o xOT1.pS: SIDE TA T CaVLH JOIrvi TO ALLOW FOR IF MEAL N FIRST AN.SS R TER 5 L BE _ C DS( ) A CE �C�EAMLENT ETERILEOTHER SECOND COI (RE'ERF TO FRAMINIO PLANS ENN BEAT. EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION DD I ON REINSTATE SEEDED ATOP OF FwISHED N WALL FNO-I UABOVETAN LOW MASONRY OPENINGS AND EXTEND z0 BEYONDCING) SOLTO BILAS ANDE ElSHAUAL TO P IF ————— ———————��AWAYB„°RE E R AND p HAD p G BOTH�DEse BHDTR P GAL N SCHEDULE E Fore ftENFoft FROM THE SLAB (REFER TO PLANS)(TYP.)FUO THE REINFORC xG t2"Ai ALL JO NA 2E0 ,LEE PREFABRICATED CDRIERI FRONT ELEVATION 5�TYPICAL DETAILD T BH N,Ere6EG,loN6 �,TYPICAL DETAIL s A V.1 ..,I SCALE:t/a°-t'-0" ..,/SCALE:N.T.S. MASONRY WALL HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT \...1 SCALE:N.i.S. v FCAL CONTROL JOINT 11 MASONRY WALLS ,L/ All� u� MORE MAN 39 ABOVE FlrvISHEO FLOOR AND INCLINED i0 ME Erv5URE00 ACCESS UN=KRSAL �� LERT SIGNAL SYAL 6TEM 8 a �1 >E AND HIT WATER SUPPLY PIPING AT uxDERSIDE OF LAIALL-1 WHERE WATER TEMFERATURE Is GREATER PATI 1.B 1�.3A,,i RR b _TCAL TO BE USABLE BY A PERSON IN A WHEELCHNR. TER FREE A B.THAIIIII 4E WAs C.ALL XVNG uVAipEY sXALL BE mDIPPm Wn11 OcO OF ANA om Ro E nNG z MAx.FRDM,XE WALL S INI-D"GD" R PE.XDDT sPRlx6 LOADING. 00 z I.PROVIDE TOWEL DISPENSERS OR OTHER HAND DRYING EWIP.—(MUST BE OPERABLE WTH ONE HAND). CHANFUTUGE ADULT C F.PROVDE SOAP DACCESSIBLE WASHROOM ES AL a] MAx.aBOK sXE (MUST BE OPERABLE W,TH ONE HA I GE TABLE � g�grchil�i�; "B BAR TO BE I."OR Ih-DIAMETER,HAVEEA SIFREss A17 s RFACEBAID PROIDE2•CLEARLBETWEEN BAR AID \` A°«sBoRS TM CONFORM g HDRLL� DDNT R B B ES GHT s ,a OF THE TOILET 1 .PROVDE SOLD BACK T /' \\ REQUIREMENTS"DIAGRA D„e„� „r" ,nT.,, C CC IN TOILET AT 33 TO 36 ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR OR 6 L_ -- NTED , b NO.TOP IF TANK,P 11 AM ACCESSIBLE BALK 6DPHQRT PGR NDHDRS. n�DE AND G TIDE OF HE i �__ 5 I—� 3� i i m �� �centric A.AN EMERGE—CALL SYSTEM FIAT CONSISTS OF ACD NO ISCAL GEICES 1 AT ME THEWORDSIEMERNI'STRIK B I TURMNG R �� .o. 8XN 01^NEHHHINQ AID ISCAL SIDI ILL AcnvATE Ix LETTERS AN LEAsr I RICH WTHAAGGE THE s3(eE swoKE ANo"iHn7R IS GErvhuon ONDXEu°I 2 ME ENTRY DOOR ASEEIRLY SPACE REQUIREDR NO RAINNER FIR REQUIRE o l $ aa °F I TDE:IGGNDA°;Eo a RA EANI E E o oR ACCESSIBILITY IN.THE FAcluiv AT � I cI_oSET OLD RAxcE ° I III/CLEARANCEORr° BUILDING ENTRIES NOTED TO FACE PUSH AECTTGNnon GRAB BARS TO ACCESSIBLE WASHROOMCE IN v(ABLE TO RE46T A LOAD OF AT LEAST 3CO Ina APPLIES—TIALLY ON HORI-1—Y. i� tom a 3.CAPABLE IF BE NO LO ID o E30s'SED i�Ro aeJS"nso c vlwsNED noon EM RBENCY AMC THAT HAS. T�` �� � UNIVERSAL WASHROOM ELEVATION 1 y n.,�oa�q mRA�c� 1.AS AN ON An I LONG LOCATED ON THE INSIDE SO THAT ITS MIDPOINT IE 43 C AS AN o NnRRo snrvc"rvc o°o °n�oorn'"Ecios[RAsvRlne rvTc[s3oa wA�sTHwcis wNli�in:,N[goat aos[s c�>xenl. �rmrwc. AUTMATICALLY. 0�n �wa cB�ARcx� CLOSET R ce TOWEL DISPENSER AIR DRYER IDGISAPPI a1 /D ll � X - EMEERRENO BSIN FRE $� TRACH BIN -6J5'MIN. 1'-6M"MIN. SIGNAL{REGU REMEnTS R # —_—_C0{�1-_ ___ _NSERS�Or \ 1'-6?b"MAX. tlB L- _ _ _ _SANITARY NAPHIN _. MIN. -0/:M -6M MIN. MIRRORTREQUIREMENTSFOR IR SOA DISPENSER No. DATE REVISION UNIVERSAL WASHROOM ENLARGED PLAN i M TOR 2019/02/21 ISSUED FOR PERMIT GAS BARS TO CONF o TOCCESSOFIESMHEIGHTOU III A AONFORM REOUIREMENTS DIAGRAMJL 00 TOVLAVATTORYORTO Y CLEARANCE a �m�m REQUIREMENTS DIAGRAM EMERGENCY BUTTON TONBEE"BECK CULIM 5S WASHROOM ACCESSORIES HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS VATORI FORTnDiOUATE n TANK WATER crosET 3 MauN P u t I � pb �m UNIVERSAL WASHROOM ELEVATION 2 R ��H�m0 AWN AS°SHE) AUDIT.AID 1.1 PORT BURWELL a, CONCRETE BLOCK CORES ALE SIGNAL TEM PAVILION AND PUBLIC T-0 TO BE GROUTED SOLID /CHANGE RE ADULT WASHROOM ADEQUATE MOENnNG /' 5540 NOVA SCOTIA LINE PORT SUPPORT BURWELL,ONTARIO LAVATORY CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS d J� IL� / / PRINT DATE: FEB.21.2015 / REFER iOLBTM BARRIER FREE 2'-6" MIRROR RIEOUIREMENTS DATE: FEB.21,Z019 DIAGONAL GRAB BA UNIVERSAL WASHROOM ELEVATION 3 - DRAWN ev: J.D.G. R /GOAT HOOK D J A MOTION SENSOR BY [ CXECKPD BY: G.R.B. -SHAPED GRAB BAR LGHRNG € (SHOWN AS DASNED) AUTOMATIC DOOR PUSH SCALE: 6" ANn-SAAN�AUSM��GVEgL TO CONCRETE BLOCK WALL \ ® BUTTON nC PROJECT No.: 19-0124 "PHO WAS"DN OOF CO HIZONTALLIN j NERS \ A ATORY TO CONFORM PA XTEkSTAINLESS�EXPCS LFASSEP `\ TO�AVATORY CLEARANCEED GERKICES \ R D IREM NTS DIAGRAM BARRIER-FREE _ CUSTDM BENT STAINLESS v NOTES AND IN PL FEEL 10 All \ UNIVERSAL STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS ` WASHROOM GRAB BAR REQUI ANTI-VANDALISM COVER AT EXPOSED SERVICE PIPING UNIVERSAL WASHROOM ELEVATION 4 T9 REMENTS TYPICAL BARRIER-FREE NOTES AND DETAILS �,UNIVERSAL WASHROOM PLAN AND ELEVATION s A4.1 ..,/SCALE:IT, SCALE:3/4'-t'-O" ,L REPORT CAO Aortunity I5 TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAOIClerk DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: CAO-23/19 SUBJECT: VIENNA COMMUNITY CENTRE BACKGROUND: At the 2019-2020 Operating Budget Meeting of January 21, 2019 staff were provided direction to report back to Council pertaining to the Vienna Community Centre. On February 7, 2019 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT discussion re Vienna Community Centre be received for information; AND THAT staff be directed to bring back an informational report for due diligence purposes on April 4, 2019 on the Vienna Community Centre usage statistics, operating costs, capital costs and forecasts. DISCUSSION The 2006-2018 Operating Budget Financials of the Vienna Community Centre are attached hereto as Appendix `A'. As noted within the Vienna Community Centre Operating Budget Financials from 2006-2018 the average annual rental revenue was $10,496.56. Available Vienna Community Centre usage statistics are as follows: Vienna Community Centre Usage Statistics Year Total Rentals Community Partner Rentals 2012-2014 (Average) 86 66 2015 112 93 2016 164 135 2017 102 59 2018 86 52 On August 16, 2018 with the passing of By-law No. 2016-059, Rates & Fees By-law, the Municipality moved from a `Fee Waiver' where the rental fee was waived for various community groups through the annual financial assistance process to a `Community Partner Fee Reduction' whereby Community Partner rental rates were reduced by $50.00/rental. The value of the 2017 and 2018 Vienna Community Centre Community Partner Fee Reduction is as follows: Community Partner Fee Reduction Vienna Community Centre - 2017 $2,950.00 Vienna Community Centre - 2018 $2,600.00 Vienna Community Centre capital forecasts include, but is not limited to: Capital Item Estimated Cost Accessible Entrance Renovations $142,876+HST (August 6, 2015 Parking Lot Reconstruction $50,000+HST FA-2-2017 Geothermal Waterfurnace Units $52,354+HST (2017) Accessible Washroom Renovations N/A (Upper/Lower) Energy Efficiency Improvements N/A As of December 31, 2018 the Vienna Community Centre Reserve balance was $86,049.91. Attached hereto as Appendix `B' is a listing of resolutions pertaining to the Vienna Community Centre compiled by searching minutes of meetings of Council. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-23/19 re Vienna Community Centre be received for information. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul Shipway CAOIClerk 2006 2007 2008 1 2009 2010 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 2018 Revenue Sundry Revenue $0.00 $192.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,599.58 $544.70 $422.06 Rentals $14,510.00 $10,223.00 $8,381.00 $8,160.00 $10,510.00 $13,523.00 $6,079.00 $6,171.90 $8,787.99 $13,399.60 $14,927.43 $13,117.50 $8,664.85 Contributions from $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Revenue $14,510.00 $10,415.00 $8,381.00 $8,160.00 $10,510.00 $13,523.00 $6,079.00 $6,171.90 $13,787.99 $13,399.60 $18,527.01 $13,662.20 $9,086.91 Expense Management Contract $7,875.48 $6,091.93 $7,646.63 $10,262.41 $9,499.92 $9,499.92 $9,898.08 $10,077.70 $9,422.71 $12,574.42 $14,479.28 $14,254.26 $14,029.26 Statutory Benefits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $153.52 $343.67 $418.11 $531.43 $448.92 Supplies $1,642.29 $1,754.42 $1,333.10 $997.72 $1,222.27 $1,414.71 $1,474.42 $803.77 $896.00 $937.73 $1,098.16 $352.18 $32.34 Utilities $9,619.47 $12,569.59 $7,387.83 $8,814.52 $8,204.53 $6,672.38 $9,042.03 $9,623.03 $13,738.36 $12,078.03 $12,779.65 $11,238.84 $8,833.07 Advertising $0.00 $0.00 $85.68 $64.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $536.35 $571.74 $325.00 $292.75 $303.07 $151.17 Building Maintenance $1,091.23 $4,605.34 $6,739.00 $3,507.29 $1,745.90 $694.67 $3,502.96 $6,680.92 $1,202.50 $10,726.41 $29,612.44 $17,650.43 $15,179.47 Equipment Maintenance $4,527.50 $3,549.96 $2,538.58 $1,521.68 $3,804.08 $2,641.75 $3,020.56 $6,909.71 $2,586.19 $858.34 $144.20 $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance $438.18 $708.75 $3,499.87 $3,017.26 $5,409.68 $5,357.17 $2,991.29 $3,525.95 $2,912.84 $8,407.78 $1,887.11 $1,096.90 $1,137.66 Insurance $3,701.00 $4,202.00 $4,370.00 $4,436.00 $4,484.00 $4,436.00 $4,224.14 $4,283.88 $4,635.20 $4,862.60 $4,611.38 $4,959.17 $5,217.71 Telephone $887.63 $631.73 $488.16 $488.16 $431.36 $460.06 $605.50 $1,058.59 $920.16 $928.22 $1,055.41 $1,459.31 $1,661.59 Sundry $876.98 $312.35 $190.25 $144.22 $284.26 $213.04 $348.98 $0.00 $7.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Service Contract $9,595.50 $9,258.66 $6,981.50 $6,707.00 $7,262.00 $9,288.00 $7,900.09 $5,426.49 $8,946.75 $7,282.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Amortization $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,703.70 $1,439.91 $1,439.91 $2,275.91 $5,800.11 $5,800.11 $5,800.11 $5,815.99 $5,800.11 $5,800.11 Total Expense $40,255.261$43,684.73 $41,260.60 $41,663.96 $43,787.91 $42,117.61 $45,283.96 $54,726.50 $51,793.991$65,124.76 $72,194.481$57,645.70 $52,491.30 Net Expense -$25,745.26 1-$33,269.73 -$32,879.60 -$33,503.96 -$33,277.91 -$28,594.61 -$39,204.96 -$48,554.60 -$38,006.00 -$51,725.16 -$53,667.47 -$43,983.50 -$43,404.39 On March 21, 1995 the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Vienna passed the following resolution: THAT the Council of the Village of Vienna accept the Tender by Koolen Electric in the amount of$19,461.00 plus G.S.T. to install Air Exchange Heat Recovery Ventilation at the Vienna Community Centre dated January 6, 1995, and also subject to requirements of Owen Glendon of Chorley & Bisset Ltd., as agreed per fax of March 21/95 by Peter Koolen, in accordance with S.M.A.C.N.A Standards, Ontario Hydro inspection and permits, and a written guarantee by the Contractor that this installed equipment will keep the air quality at an acceptable level. On June 26, 1996 the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Vienna passed the following resolution: THAT the Council of the Village of Vienna accept the tender of Andy Ralf to replace the Community Centre roof with 28 gauge steel, in the amount of $11,224.05, subject to tender requirements. On March 27, 1997 the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Vienna passed the following resolution: THAT the tender for the Vienna Community Centre roof repair by Lamers General Contractors in the amount of$3,633.04, excluding GST, be accepted as submitted. April 3, 1997 the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Vienna passed the following resolution: THAT the tender by Hewbank's Paint and Wallpaper to refinish the Community Centre floors, in the amount of$4,333.84, including tax, be accepted as submitted. On July 16, 1998 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report 98068 be received; AND THAT the proper meter chamber be installed with meter and readout at the Memorial park at an estimated cost of$250.00; AND THAT staff be directed to install the appropriate meter and readout at the Library/former Clerk's office at an estimated cost equal to staff time; AND THAT the Municipality purchase a new meter for the Vienna Community Centre at an estimated cost of$150.00. On November 5, 1998 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report 98115 be approved; AND THAT the tender bid received from Klassen Construction in the amount of$7,494.06 for the tender for Drywall Exits at the Vienna Community Centre be accepted; AND THAT the tender bid received from Grassmere Security in the amount of $16,850.00 for the Vienna Community Centre and Bayham Community Centre Fire Alarm System be accepted; AND THAT the tender bid received from Armstrong Fire Protection in the amount of$3,145.80 for Fire Protection System on Commercial Cooking Equipment at both community centres be accepted; AND THAT the Chief Building Official be directed to obtain a quote from Hewbank Paint &Wallpaper for flame retardant treatment on the Vienna Community Centre walls for Council's consideration. On December 17, 1998 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report 98/30 regarding Price Quotes for Drywalling and Painting the Vienna Community Centre be received; AND THAT Council direct staff to retain the following contractors to complete the jobs as quoted: Brennholt Plastering & Drywall and Paul's Painting; AND THAT Staff obtain estimates for the installation of a chair rail for Council's consideration. On January 14, 1999 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report 99004 regarding the chair rail and renovations to the Vienna Community Centre be received; AND THAT Council hereby approves the additional costs including the installation of a chair rail for approximately $633.00. On February 4, 1999 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Vienna Lioness Club correspondence received February 1, 1999 be received; AND THAT Council of the Municipality of Bayham hereby agrees to accept responsibility for payment of the public pay telephone at the Vienna Community Centre. On March 4, 1999 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff be directed to prepare an agreement between the municipality and Cliff and Vicky Wiggans for management of the Vienna Community Centre, for Council's consideration. On July 15, 1999 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report A99007 regarding improvements to the Vienna Memorial Park and Vienna Community Centre be received; AND THAT Council of the Municipality of Bayham approves the Vienna Lions Club proposal to install underground wiring and the dusk to dawn light in the Vienna Memorial Park subject to approval of location by the Chief Building Official and obtaining the proper permits and inspections from Ontario Hydro; AND FURTHER THAT Council approves the Vienna Lions Club proposal to renovate the Men's and Women's washrooms on the main floor of the Vienna Community Centre subject to receiving the appropriate renovation permit and inspections from the Chief Building Official. On August 5, 1999 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report T99005 regarding the erection of Straffordville Lions Club and Vienna Lions Club Service Clubs and Museums signage at the entrances to the Hamlet of Straffordville and Village of Vienna be received; AND THAT Council approve both of these applications and direct the Public Works Department to install the signs at locations approved by the Municipality's Chief Building Official and the County of Elgin Engineering Department. On October 21, 1999 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution:' THAT Staff Report F99023 be received; AND THAT a regular maintenance program for the Vienna Community Centre be established with R&R Refrigeration at the quoted price of$968.00 per annum (plus GST). On October 21, 1999 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report F99022 be received; AND THAT a telephone line be installed at the Vienna Community Centre to properly support both staff and the security system. On March 16, 2000 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report C2000-05 be received; AND THAT Council directs Staff to advertise for a Part-time Manager, Contract position, ending December 31, 2000, at a rate of$6,000 per year pro-rated for the Vienna Community Centre; AND THAT the Community Centres interview committee recommend the preferred Candidate(s) to Council for consideration. On March 16, 2000 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Council approves the Committee request that the Vienna Community Centre floor be refinished prior to finalization of the 2000 Budget; AND THAT Staff be directed to co-ordinate this said work as soon as possible. On April 6, 2000 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the proposed contract with Mr. Mark Campbell attached to Staff Report A2000-02 for the Management of the Vienna Community Centre be approved, subject to any changes recommended by the Municipal Solicitor; AND THAT notwithstanding Section 26 and pursuant to Section 37 of the Procedure By-law, By-law 2000-35, being a by-law to authorize the execution of an agreement between the Municipality of Bayham and Mark Campbell, for management of the Vienna Community Centre, be presented to Council for enactment. On January 4, 2001 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Council accepts the tender submitted by Ramona Peidl for the provision of Janitorial Services for the Vienna Community Centre; AND THAT By-law 2001-05, being a by-law to authorize the endorsement of an Agreement with Ramona Peidl be presented to Council for enactment. On January 18, 2001 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Council supports the selection of Wanda Gillis to provide contract managerial services at the Vienna Community Centre; AND THAT By-law 2001-07, being a by-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an Agreement for Management of the Vienna Community Centre be presented to Council for enactment. On August 7, 2003 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Staff Memorandum dated July 25, 2003 be received; AND THAT By-law 2003-66, being a by-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an agreement with Frank and Linda Giesbrecht for the provision of management services for the Vienna Community Centre, be presented to Council for enactment. On March 18, 2004 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report 2004-10 regarding reserve allocations be received; AND THAT allocations to carry forward unexpended capital funds for the following purposes be made in the 2003 accounts: Straffordville Community Centre $ 3,482 Vienna Community Centre $ 3,395 Harbour Change Rooms $12,000 Economic Development—Signs $ 5,900; AND THAT a reserve allocation be made for the following amounts: Environmental services $ 3,764 Edison Building Fund $ 3,872; AND THAT sufficient funds be drawn from the operating rate stabilization reserve to finance the 2003 year-end deficit of$22,201. On January 6, 2005 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff proceed with discussions with the Vienna Lions Club and County Library Board to examine relocating library services in Vienna to the Vienna Community Centre, and proceed with preparation of an application to the Ontario Trillium Foundation for funding for relocation and accessibility costs. On January 6, 2005 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report C2005-005 be received; AND THAT the Council of the Municipality of Bayham approve the management services contract for the Vienna Community Centre for a one- year term at an annual rate of$6,800; AND THAT By-law 2005-005, being a by-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a one-year contract agreement with Jacqueline B.Bootle for management services at the Vienna Community Centre, be presented to Council for enactment. On December 1, 2005 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Memorandum 2005-010 regarding Community Centre Management and the Janitorial Services Agreements be received; AND THAT By-law 2005-119, 2005-120 and 2005-121, being by-laws to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute renewal agreements with Jacqueline Bootle and Ramona Peidl for Vienna Community Centre Management and Community Centres Janitorial Services, respectively, be presented to Council for enactment. On November 2, 2006 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT By-Law 2006-108, being a by-law to authorize the renewal of an agreement with Jacqueline Bootle for Vienna Community Centre management services be presented to Council for enactment. On December 7, 2006 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Community Centres Committee draft minutes of the meeting held November 30th be received; THAT Council authorize payment for the washroom renovations from the Vienna Community Centre current year capital budget and reserve fund; AND THAT Council authorize the transfer of any Community Centres unexpended 2006 capital remaining at December 31 sc to the respective Reserve Funds at yearend. On September 6, 2007 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Memorandums C2007-012 and C2007-013 be received; AND THAT Council authorize the purchase and delivery of a natural gas stove Model 11284 for the Vienna Community Centre from Butcher Restaurant Supplies and installation by Jake Wall heating as quoted; AND THAT the Vienna Recreation Reserve and the Vienna Community Centre Reserve Fund be utilized for the purchase and installation of the unit. On June 5, 2008 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT By-Law 2008-058, as amended to include the Vienna Community Centre only, being a by-Law to amend the agreement with Randy Beach for the provision of landscape services, attached to By-law 2008-045, be presented to Council for enactment. On June 5, 2008 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT By-Law 2008-059, being a By-Law to further amend the agreement with Jacqueline B. Bootle for the provision of Vienna Community Centre management services, attached to By-law 2005-119, be presented to Council for enactment. On December 18, 2008 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Draft Community Centres minutes of meeting held December 11, 2008 be received; AND THAT By-Law 2008-121 to renew agreement for Vienna Community Centre management services and By-Law 2008-122 to extend agreements with Ramona Peidl for janitorial services at the community centres be presented to Council for enactment. On April 1, 2010 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Bayham Community Centres Committee minutes of meeting held March 25, 2010 be received; AND THAT By-Law 2010-035, being a by-law to renew the Vienna Centre management contract with Jacquline Bootle be presented to Council for enactment. On August 12, 2010 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff Report PR2010-09 regarding Vienna Community Centre-Required Repairs be received; AND THAT staff be authorized to proceed to retain engineering assistance to initiate required works at the Vienna Community Centre. On February 3, 2011 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT By-Law 2011-013 being a by-law to authorize the renewal of an agreement with Jackie Bootle for management of the Vienna Community Centre, By-Law 2011-014 and 2011-015 being by-laws to authorize the renewal of agreements with Ramona Peidl for janitorial services for the Bayham and Vienna Community Centres and, By-Law 2011-017, being a by-law to authorize the renewal of an agreement with Ramona Peidl for management back-up services for the Vienna and Bayham Community Centres be presented to Council for enactment. On April 7, 2011 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Council authorizes the purchase of a Fagor dishwasher for the Vienna Community Centre from Del-Bac Sales at a cost of$7,332; AND THAT the purchase of a pumping system and water softener and installations by Darlington Wiring& Plumbing at a cost of$3,649.97 plus HST be approved. On January 12, 2012 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT By-law 2012-005, being a by-law to authorize an agreement with Jackie Ringland for management services for the Vienna Community Centre, be presented to Council for enactment. On August 2, 2012 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Council awards the construction contract for the Vienna Community Centre renovations to Ed Mathews for$92,843.00 plus HST and contingency; AND THAT costs for this renovation project over the amount in the 2012 budget be drawn from the Vienna Community Centre Reserve Fund. On September 20, 2012 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Council accepts the quote from Ed Matthews for repainting existing painted surfaces at the Vienna Community Centre, with two coats of paint in the basement, including stairwells, and in the upper hall, including stage, bar and cloak room at a total cost of$9,892.63. plus HST; THAT Council accepts the quote submitted by Carpet Department for floor covering replacement of the front entrance stair treads and risers with brown Vinyl stair treads at a cost of$1,100.20 plus HST; THAT the costs for the painting of the existing painted surfaces and installing vinyl stair treads on the main entrance stairs be drawn from the Vienna Community Centre Reserve Fund; AND THAT Council consider flooring installation in the basement and front and back hallways and drywall installation on the basement walls in 2013. On September 20, 2012 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Staff be authorized to prepare the necessary documentation for application for accessibility improvements at the Vienna Community Centre under the Enabling Accessibility Fund. On October 4, 2012 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the proposal for the installation of playground equipment at the Vienna Community Centre property from Henderson Recreation for the amount of $39,932.79 be accepted; funds to come from the 2012 Capital Account 01- 5510-5710; AND THAT the equipment be installed within the existing fence in the baseball diamond. On February 7, 2013 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Municipality of Bayham enter into a Contribution Agreement for funding under the Community Infrastructure Improvement Fund (CIIF) for the Fire Code Upgrades to the Vienna Community Centre (Project No. C0069); AND THAT By-law No. 2013-017 to authorize execution of a Contribution Agreement with Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada be presented to Council for enactment. On June 20, 2013 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Council accepts the quote to remove and dispose of the existing paneling and to install 1/2 inch drywall, tape, prime and paint, in the basement area of the Vienna Community Centre submitted by Paul's Drywalling, in the amount of $2,599, including HST, subject to the contractor providing a certificate of insurance, naming the Municipality of Bayham as an additional insured, in the minimum amount of$2,000,000. On September 19, 2013 Councillor Casier noted that the Vienna Lions Club is having magnetic locks installed on the upper and lower interior fire doors at the Vienna Community Centre and suggested that a letter of appreciation be sent to the Club. On November 7, 2013 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Community Centres Committee minutes of meeting held September 26 be received; AND THAT Council approves payment for the refinishing of the Vienna Community Centre hall floor from the Vienna Community Centre Reserve Fund. On March 6, 2014 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT By-Law 2014-024, being a by-law to authorize the execution of an agreement regarding the Enabling Accessibility Fund, be presented to Council for enactment. On July 17, 2014 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Bayham Community Centres Committee minutes of meeting held June 26, 2014 be received; THAT Council approves the recommendations provided by the Committee; THAT the name of the Community Centre in Straffordville be changed to the Straffordville Community Centre; AND THAT By-Law 2014-082, being a By-Law to adopt policies for the operation and management of the Straffordville and Vienna Community Centre facilities be presented to Council for enactment. On November 6, 2014 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham direct the Administrator to purchase locking storage cabinets, utilizing funds from the Vienna Community Centre reserve not to exceed $1,000.00, to be placed in the Vienna Community Centre cloak room for the Lion's items to be locked within. On May 11, 2015 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT staff be directed to report back to Council on the costs of a lift versus an elevator at the Vienna Community Centre; AND THAT the accessibility renovations to the Vienna Community Centre be completed in 2015. On June 4, 2015 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT staff be directed to make application under the Canada 150 Infrastructure Fund for renovations to the Vienna Community Centre. On June 4, 2015 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT staff be directed to submit applications under the Canada 150 Infrastructure Fund ranking the Vienna Community Centre as Project No. 1 and the Straffordville Community Centre as Project No. 2. On June 18, 2015 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report CAO -39/15 re Vienna Community Centre Accessibility Renovations be received for information; AND THAT Council direct staff to proceed with tendering utilizing the Spriets Associates proposal; AND THAT funds for the project be allocated from the Enabling Accessibility Fund Grant, Vienna Community Centre Reserve and the Facility Reserve if required. On September 3, 2015 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT staff be directed to return the $50,000 grant from the Enabling Accessibility Fund for the Vienna Community Centre to Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. On September 3, 2015 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report CAO-54/15 re Vienna Community Centre Tender Results be received for information; AND THAT By-law 2015-088 being a by-law to enter into a construction agreement with Grassmere Construction Ltd. be received for information. On October 15, 2015 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report CAO-81/15 re Vienna Community Centre be received for information; AND THAT staff be directed to request Grassmere complete the loading dock work for$5,000; AND THAT if Grassmere refuses, staff be directed to complete the work up to a maximum of$5,000. On March 3, 2016 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report CAO-14/16 re Vienna Community Centre be received for information; AND THAT staff be directed to proceed as outlined within Report CAO-14/16. On October 3, 2016 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT staff be directed to remove Capital Item FA-2- Vienna Community Centre Parking Lot from the 2017 Capital Budget and Council have further discussion during 2017 on the Capital Item. On September 7, 2017 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the requests from Bayham Historical Society re Vienna Memorial Park and Vienna Community Centre be received for information; AND THAT Vienna Community Centre curtain track be referred to the 2018 Operating Budget for Council consideration. On March 15, 2018 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the Vienna Lioness Request for Hot Water Heater Booster be referred to staff to report back to Council. On April 5, 2018 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report CAO-35/18 re Vienna Community Centre Hot Water Heater- Dishwasher be received for information; AND THAT staff be directed to move forward as outlined within Report CAO- 35/18; AND THAT the project be funded by the Vienna Community Centre Reserve Fund. On June 21, 2018 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT the presentation by Vienna Parents re soccer nets at the Vienna Community Centre be received for information; AND THAT Council direct staff to proceed with procurement of soccer nets for placement at the Vienna Community Center at an upset limit of$4,000 from the Parks and Playground Reserve; AND THAT size of the nets be determined in conjunction with the Vienna Parents; AND THAT the submitted petition be filed with the Clerk. REPORT o.r CAO tunity IS TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: CAO-24/19 SUBJECT: 8354 PLANK RD. — COMMUNICATION TOWER BACKGROUND: On February 28, 2019, Turris Group contacted the Municipality of Bayham concerning the possibility of erecting a communication tower at 8354 Plank Rd. — Municipality of Bayham Public Works Yard. The general requirements of the proposed communication tower is as follows: • Area required is 10 metres x 10 metres • Tower height is approximately 30 metres • Site would be separately metered for hydro, and Turris Group would cover all hydro costs • Standard Lease Agreement with 21 year term Attached hereto as Appendix `A' is a simulation of what the proposed communication tower may look like on the subject property. DISCUSSION Pursuant to the Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law, a proposed communication tower on the subject property must comply with the regulations in which the communication tower is located. The provisions of this By-law shall not apply to the use of any land or to the erection, alternation or use of any building or structure, or portion thereof, for the purpose of public service by a public authority or public utility provided: a) The lot coverage, setback and yard requirements prescribed for the zone in which such land, building or structure is located are complied with except in the case of buildings and structures erected prior to the date of the passing of the By-law in which case the requirement does not apply. The proposed location complies with the minimum setback requirements of the accessory use in the Institutional (1) Zone. Turris Group has lease agreements for communication towers and equipment with a number of municipalities including, but not limited to: • South-West Oxford • County of Lanark • Township of Wellington North • City of Mississauga • City of Brampton • City of Clarington Based on the ability to generate additional annual sundry revenues and the ability to locate the proposed communication tower in a location that would not adversely affect operations staff respectfully recommend Council direct staff to proceed with negotiations. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-24/19 re 8354 Plank Rd. — Communication Tower be received for information; 2. AND THAT Council direct staff to proceed with negotiations with Turris Group to place a communication tower at 8354 Plank Rd. 3. AND THAT pending negotiations staff be directed to bring forward a by-law to enter into an agreement with Turris Group for the provision of a communication tower at 8354 Plank Rd. Respectfully Submitted by: 77 Paul Shipway CAOIClerk Staff ordville Photo Sims 8354 Plank Road jW F �s While we endeavour to fairly represent the proposed structure,photo simulations are for conceptual purposes only. 1 ■ 835 Plank Rd r � - \\ All 2\l:a ¥5z � / � I A Am Ore N I �4 �r,- - REPORT CAO poltunity Is�o TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: CAO-25/19 SUBJECT: INVESTING IN CANADA INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (ICIP) - RURAL & NORTHERN STREAM BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2018 the Honourable Amarjeet Sohi, Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, and the Honourable Bob Chiarelli, Ontario Minister of Infrastructure, announced the signing of a bilateral agreement that will provide more than $11.8 billion through the Investing in Canada plan over the next decade in federal funding dedicated to infrastructure projects. The Investing in Canada Plan is commonly known as Infrastructure Phase 2. Under Infrastructure Phase 1, Infrastructure Ontario approved more than 2,000 projects worth more than $1.6 billion in Ontario. This includes the Clean Water Wastewater Fund (CWWF) Port Burwell Storm Sewer Phase 1A project completed in 2017. The stated goals of the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) includes: • Faster commute and travel time for more people, and easier movement of goods for businesses • Cleaner air and water • Reduced greenhouse gas emissions • Smarter and more efficient cities • Sustainable water management • Enhanced public parks, recreational facilities and other spaces that make communities great places to live • Better transportation and digital infrastructure for people living in remote communities • Increased energy security and reduced reliance on diesel in the North The Canada Infrastructure Program has four (4) funding streams: Public Green (Community, Rural & Northern Transit Infrastructure Culture & Community (Recreation Federal $8.3 billion $2.8 billion $407 million $250 million Provincial $6.8 billion $2.3 billion $335 million $206 million DISCUSSION INVESTING IN CANADA INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (ICIP)—RURAL& NORTHERN STREAM On March 12, 2019, the Province of Ontario Minister of Infrastructure launched the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP)— Rural & Northern stream. The ICIP Rural and Northern stream objective is to support improved and/or more reliable roads and bridges. Applications to the ICIP— Rural & Northern stream are due May 14th, 2019. The maximum total eligible cost per project for a single applicant is $5 million. Successful application funding allocation is as follows: Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) Rural & Northern Stream Funding Share Federal Provincial Municipal 50% 33.33% 16.67% ICIP — Rural & Northern stream assessment criteria is as follows: 1) Criticality of health and/or safety risk Projects will be assessed according to critical health and safety aspects. The technical schedule will provide asset type specific questions for describing the health and safety risk. 2) Technical merit of proposed project Projects will be assessed based on technical merit relative to industry standards. Projects must clearly demonstrate that the proposed project will address the noted critical health and safety risk, and how they meet the federal outcome of `improved and/or more reliable transportation (road, air and marine) infrastructure'. The technical schedule will provide asset specific questions for describing the technical merit and reliability of the proposed project including consideration of Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) 3) Funding need for the proposed project Projects will be assessed according to greater funding need, including the cost of the proposed project per household, median household income and weighted property assessment per household. The Manager of Capital Works lWater/Wastewater, Road Operations Supervisor and CAOICIerk identified the following projects for consideration: 1) Option No. 1 - Baynor South Bridge Corridor a. Baynor South Bridge Replacement b. Bayham Norfolk Boundary Road (approximately 2,900 metres) i. Convert gravel to Tar& Chip c. Eden Line (approximately 1,600 metres) i. Convert gravel to Tar& Chip d. Additional Information i. Two (2) large culverts ii. AADT 175 2) Option No. 2 —Tollgate Road Corridor a. Tollgate Road (approximately 11,950 metres) i. Convert gravel to Tar & Chip ii. Reconstruct existing Tar & Chip b. Howey Line (approximately 1,300 metres) i. Convert gravel to Tar& Chip c. Additional Information i. Six (6) large culverts ii. AADT 360 3) Option No. 3 — Light Line Corridor a. Light Line (approximately 8,700 metres) i. Reconstruct existing Tar& Chip b. Light Line Bridge i. OSIM repairs c. Additional Information i. Nine (9) large culverts ii. AADT 464 When considering upper level of government funding programs to utilize various levels of upper government support the most effectively, staff identify large projects the Municipality may undertake to obtain the most value from the various programs. Without upper level of government support, these projects are typically difficult for the Municipality to complete and/or address the Municipality of Bayham infrastructure backlog as identified in the Municipality of Bayham Asset Management Plan. Considering the ICIP Rural & Northern stream criteria and the above noted option highlights staff would respectfully recommend Council direct staff to make application for Option No. 3— Light Line Corridor. • Light Line has the second highest AADT of all Tar & Chip roads in the Municipality of Bayham. • Light Line Bridge rehabilitation is tentatively scheduled for 2020 • Light Line has nine (9) large culverts ranging from 10-50 feet below road surface Although the Light Line road surface does not have significant surface discontinuities, the road does have a degraded road profile. The factor that elevated Light Line Corridor to the option staff recommend is as result of the nine (9) large culverts ranging from 10-50 feet below road surface. In 2008, Light Line was closed as a result of a culvert failure with a replacement cost of approximately $280,000. ONTARIO COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE FUND—TOP-UP PROGRAM On September 7, 2017, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Report CAO-61/17 re Infrastructure Grant Applications be received for information; AND THAT staff be directed to make application to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)— Municipalities for Climate Innovation Program (MCIP) for Substage 1A of the Port Burwell Storm Sewer System works; AND THAT staff be directed to make application to the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund —Top-Up Program for Substage 1 C and Substage 1 D of the Port Burwell Storm Sewer System works; On March 14, 2019, the Province of Ontario Minister of Infrastructure announced the 2018 and 2019 OCIF Top-Up Application Grant Program was canceled. The OCIF Top-Up Program was $100,000 million annually. In the correspondence from the Minister of Infrastructure, the following statement was made concerning applications under the 2018 OCIF Top-up Program: Projects that were submitted to the 2018 top-up application intake were reviewed and evaluated based on the criteria outlined in the program guidelines. While no funding will be provided through the 2018 OCIF application intake, it is our intent to nominate a number of road and bridge projects— that would have been successful under the program— for federal funding under the Rural and Northern stream on an accelerated basis. The Municipality of Bayham Port Burwell Storm Sewer Phase 1 C/D was not nominated for the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP)— Rural & Northern stream, as stormwater projects are not eligible under the Rural & Northern Stream. Staff would respectfully recommend Council write the Minister of Infrastructure and advocate for the Municipality of Bayham Port Burwell Storm Sewer Phase 1 C/D, submitted under the 2018 OCIF Top-up Program, be nominated by the Province for the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) — Green Infrastructure Stream. The Minister of Infrastructure has indicated the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) — Green Infrastructure Stream will open in 2019. PROVINCE OF ONTARIO—2019 UNCONDITIONAL TRANSFER On March 20, 2019, the Province of Ontario Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing provided correspondence, attached hereto as Appendix `A', to the Mayor concerning an unconditional one-time payment of$546,408 to the Municipality of Bayham. The March 20, 2019 unconditional funding announcement was for a cumulative amount of approximately $200 million. It is reasonable to assume this funding is the cancelled OCIF Top- Up money repurposed one time. Although the unconditional $546,408 is obviously a benefit to the Municipality, in 2016 OCIF Top-Up provided the Municipality $1,255,004.47 (works in 2017). Further, the 2018 OCIF Top- up was expected to provide the Municipality $1,324,932 (works in 2020). The Municipality of Bayham is committed to service delivery innovation and overall effectiveness as evidenced by, but not limited to, the 2017 E.A. Danby Award for Municipal Administration Innovation and the 2018 John Niedra Award for Innovative Service Delivery, Maintenance and Construction Activity. With the uncertainty of provincial transfer funding levels in 2020 (OMPF, OCIF Formula), recent drawdown of municipal reserves and the current full slate of 2019 Municipality of Bayham capital projects staff would respectfully recommend Council allocate the $546,408 to the Road Construction Reserve. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-25/19 re Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP)— Rural & Northern stream be received for information; 2. AND THAT Council direct staff to make application to the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) — Rural & Northern Stream for the Light Line Corridor Project; 3. AND THAT staff be directed to write the Minister of Infrastructure and advocate for the Municipality of Bayham Port Burwell Storm Sewer Phase 1 C/D, submitted under the 2018 OCIF Top-up Program, be nominated by the Province for the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) —Green Infrastructure Stream. 4. AND THAT Council allocate the 2019 Unconditional Transfer of$546,408 to the Road Construction Reserve. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul Shipway CAOICIerk Ministry of Ministere des " lrl Municipal Affairs Affaires municipales and Housing et du Logement Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre 777 Bay Street, 17"Floor 777, rue Bay, 17'etage Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Toronto ON M5G 2E5 Tel.:416 585-7000 Tel. :416 585-7000 Fax:416 585-6470 Te1ec. :416 585-6470 March 20, 2019 Your Worship Mayor Ed Ketchabaw Municipality of Bayham eketchabaw(o)_bayham.on.ca Dear Mayor Ketchabaw: Our government for the people was elected to restore trust, transparency and accountability in Ontario's finances. As you know, the province has undertaken a line- by-line review of our own expenditures, and we have been clear that we expect our partners, including municipalities, to take steps to become more efficient as well. Municipalities play a key role in delivering many provincial services that people across Ontario rely on. Taxpayers deserve modern, efficient service delivery that puts people at the centre and respects hard-earned dollars. Transforming service delivery and identifying more modern, efficient ways of operating is critical and complex work. As Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, I recognize that many of Ontario's small and rural municipalities may have limited capacity to plan and manage transformation, depending on the resources they have available and how far they have moved on their own modernization agendas. That is why we are providing a one-time payment in the 2018-19 fiscal year to support small and rural municipalities' efforts to become more efficient and reduce expenditure growth in the longer term. To ensure that this investment is targeted to where it is needed most, municipal allocations are based on a formula, which takes into consideration the number of households in a municipality and whether it is urban or rural. While this investment is unconditional, it is intended to help modernize service delivery and reduce future costs through investments in projects such as: service delivery reviews, development of shared services agreements, and capital investments. Our government believes that municipalities are best positioned to understand the unique circumstances and determine where and how this money is best spent. I am pleased to share that Municipality of Bayham receive a one-time payment of $546,408, which will flow in this fiscal year. Staff from our regional Municipal Services Offices will be in touch in the coming days for your acknowledgement of this letter and to discuss any questions that you might have. I encourage you to work with ministry staff as you begin to think about the best way to proceed for your community. The Municipal Services Offices can offer advice and point to examples that may be helpful as you contemplate local solutions. In the future, we would be interested to hear about your modernization success stories. Thank you once again for your commitment to demonstrating value for money. I look forward to continuing to work together to help the people and businesses in communities across our province thrive. Sincerely, C��04Z Steve Clark Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing REPORT o.r CAO tunity IS TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAOICIerk DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: CAO-26/19 SUBJECT: ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STRATEGY BACKGROUND In 2018, Southwestern Public Health (formerly Elgin St. Thomas Public Health) Healthy Communities Partnership developed an Elgin County Trails Strategy. The Elgin County Trails Strategy, attached hereto as Appendix `A', is designed as a long-term strategy and guide for trail design, development and promotion throughout Elgin-St. Thomas. The Elgin County Trails Strategy builds upon excellent trail work that has previously been completed by municipalities and stakeholders over the past several decades with the goal of moving forward in a collaborative manner with quality trail infrastructure and a coordinated trail marketing approach to add significant value to the unique, affordable and enjoyable lifestyle the area offers. DISCUSSION Southwestern Public Health Healthy Communities Partnership is a local community project that works collaboratively to identify and advocate for health in all policies to ensure the healthy choice is the easier choice for Elgin County residents. The Municipality of Bayham is a member of the Southwestern Public Health Healthy Communities Partnership. Further, the Municipality of Bayham has received significant value from Southwestern Public Health and the evidenced based, innovative strategies identified to achieve population health outcomes with a focus on health equity. Following the Elgin St. Thomas Cycling Master Plan there continued to be significant interest towards trail development and improved walkability County wide. As a result, Southwestern Public Health was able to secure funds from the Public Health Agency of Canada to develop the Elgin County Trails Strategy. A County-wide trail strategy presents a significant opportunity to work in a comprehensive, collaborative and coordinated manner to build upon all the hard work that has been previously completed, and to leverage the experience and expertise of all who have contributed to these efforts. The Elgin County Trail Study is intended to be a guide for future development, to build on the trail work and initiatives that have already taken place and to enable those responsible for the design, development and implementation of trails to use a consistent guideline and resource to enhance trail infrastructure improve overall route connectivity, overcome barriers while highlighting and preserving areas of natural and cultural significance. The Elgin County Trails Strategy generally recommends that the County of Elgin should assume a lead partner role in planning, developing and marketing regional scale trails networks in concert with municipal and other partners. Specific to the Municipality of Bayham the Elgin County Trails Study recommends the County, in partnership with the Municipality, consider the following priorities: • Formalizing the existing rail-trail between Tunnel Line and Bridge Street (Port Burwell); • Extending the existing rail-trail that currently terminates at Bridge Street in Port Burwell, through to Pitt Street. • Further investigate developing a trail along the former rail corridor, o This segment of rail-trail forms the southern segment of a trail that could ultimately extend to the Town of Tillsonburg, and connect the communities of Vienna, Straffordville and Eden along the way. o Investment in this trail could also prove to be a benefit for the County and Municipality in terms of its cycling tourism opportunity. When Elgin County considers the various recommendations within the Elgin County Trails Strategy, it would be beneficial for all parties to consider the Otter Valley Utility Corridor from Tunnel Line to Bridge Street as a pilot trail project. North of Chute Line the Otter Valley Utility Corridor is subject to various lease agreements that explicitly prohibit recreational uses. However, the Otter Valley Utility Corridor is subject to frequent trespass most notably from recreational motorized vehicles. If Elgin County and the Municipality completed a pilot trail project on the Otter Valley Utility Corridor from Tunnel Line to Bridge Street that reduced negative impacts, opportunity may arise in the future, to discuss developing the remainder of the Otter Valley Utility Corridor as a trail with the consent of the Lessee's. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-26/19 re Elgin County Trails Strategy be received for information; 2. AND THAT the Municipality of Bayham advocate for consideration of the Otter Valley Utility Corridor from Tunnel Line to Bridge Street as a pilot trail project should Elgin County implement recommendations within the Elgin County Trails Strategy. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul Shipway CAOICIerk mow L All" ELGIN COUNTY T Al L TU Y REPORT C i ACTIVEE LG 1 N S IffhWFSTE•°• mo �� El an aLinty Public Health move-yodr rvar�-today www.attivealgin.cc TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 1 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................1 A VISION FOR TRAILS IN ELGIN COUNTY......................................................................3 TRAILS STUDY PROCESS...........................................................................................................4 REPORT OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................5 2.0 1 SUPPORT FOR TRAILS.......................................................6 2.1 PROVINCIAL & LOCAL POLICY...............................................................................................6 2.2 BENEFITS OF TRAILS....................................................................................................................7 3 WHAT WE HEARD FROM RESIDENTS & STAKEHOLDERS..............................10 THEAPPROACH............................................................................................................................10 KEYTHEMES......................................................................................................................................11 3.0 1 THE TRAIL NETWORK ..................................................... 12 WHO ARE WE DESGINING TRAILS FOR?......................................................................13 TRAIL ROUTE SELECTION PRINCIPLES..........................................................................14 3.3 TRAIL NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROCESS............................................................16 EXISTING CONDITIONS.............................................................................................................18 OPPORTUNITIES & CHALLENGES......................................................................................18 THE RECOMMENDED TRAIL NETWORK......................................................................19 .1 THE TRAILS NETWORK.............................................................................................................19 3.5.3 UNDERSTANDING THE TRAILS NETWORK...............................................................20 3.6 PLANNING FOR TRAILS...........................................................................................................25 3.6.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT &TRAILS ......................................................................25 .6.2 TRAILS & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT...............................................................29 TRAI LS I N NATU RAL AR EAS.................................................................................................30 TRAILS AND LINEAR CORRIDORS....................................................................................32 r6. SECURING ACCESS FOR TRAILS.......................................................................................36 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.7 DESGINING TRAILS......................................................................................................................37 3.7.1 TRAIL TYPES....................................................................................................................................38 3.7.2 TRAIL SLOPE......................................................................................................................................41 3.7.3 ROAD CROSSINGS.......................................................................................................................42 3.7.4 STAGING AREAS...........................................................................................................................46 3.7.5 ACCESSIBILITY...............................................................................................................................48 3.7.6 ACCESS BARRIERS AND GATES.......................................................................................50 3.7.7 SIGNAGE & INFORMATION...................................................................................................52 3.7.8 BRIDGES AND BOARDWALKS...........................................................................................56 3.7.9 TRAIL AMENITIES......................................................................................................................... 57 3.7.10 TRAIL LIGHTING ............................................................................................................................58 3.8 TRAIL MAINTENANCE...............................................................................................................59 3.8.1 RISK MANAGEMENT & LIABILITY......................................................................................59 3.8.2 TRAIL MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES.................................................................................61 CHAPTER 4.01 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES.................................64 4.1 PRIORITIES FOR TRAIL DEVELOPMENT......................................................................65 4.1.1 COUNTY-WIDE...............................................................................................................................65 4.1.2 AYLMER..............................................................................................................................................65 4.1.3 BAYHAM.............................................................................................................................................66 4.1.4 CENTRAL ELGIN............................................................................................................................67 4.1.5 DUTTON-DUNWICH...................................................................................................................68 4.1.6 MALAHIDE........................................................................................................................................69 4.1.7 WEST ELGIN.....................................................................................................................................69 4.1.8 SOUTHWOLD..................................................................................................................................70 4.1.9 ST. THOMAS.......................................................................................................................................71 4.1.10 UPDATING THE NETWORK....................................................................................................72 4.2 NETWORK MANAGEMENT....................................................................................................73 4.3 FUNDING.............................................................................................................................................74 4.3.1 TRAIL CONSTRUCTION COSTS............................................................................................74 4.3.2 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES......................................................................................75 4.4 PARTNERSHIPS.............................................................................................................................80 4.4.1 PARTNERS........................................................................................................................................80 ii I ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 L� TABLE Jo • CONTENTS • � ,� r 4.5 PROMOTION & OUTREACH..................................................................................................85 CHAPTER 5.0 1 CONCLUSION......................................................................87 iii I ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 kL� TABLE OF CONTENTS r LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Summary of Elgin County Trail Route Selection Criteria..................................................14 Table 2 Trail Network Statistics............................................................................................................................19 Table 3 Longitudinal and Cross Slope..............................................................................................................41 Table 4 Trail Maintenance Strategies..............................................................................................................61 Table 5 Estimated Trail Construction Cost by Municipality............................................................75 Table 6 Potential External Funding Sources.............................................................................................76 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 Primary Multi-use Trail .........................................................................................................................38 Figure 2 Secondary Trail &Secondary Trail in a Woodlot.................................................................39 Figure3 Tertiary Trail..................................................................................................................................................40 Figure Controlled Crossing (upper), Uncontrolled Crossing (lower).....................................45 Figure5 Rural Trail Crossing..................................................................................................................................46 Figure6 Typical Staging Area...............................................................................................................................47 Figure 7 Heavy Duty Access Control Gate for Rural Locations......................................................50 Figure 8 Information Signing on Rural Trail Access Gates in New Tecumseth, ON (WSP).........................................................................................................................................................................................51 Figure 9 1 Trailhead Sign Examples I Clockwise from Upper Left Rondeau Provincial Park, ON; Centre Wellington Township, ON; St Catharines, ON; Guelph ON (source WSP).........................................................................................................................................................................................53 Figure 10 Trailhead Sign -Schematic Concept.......................................................................................53 Figure 11 Trail directional sign examples-clockwise from upper left Montague, PEI; Peterborough, ON;Waterloo, ON; St. Thomas, ON (source WSP)..................................................54 Figure 12 1 Interpretive sign examples-clockwise from upper left Collingwood, ON; Guelph, ON; Sauble Beach, ON;Tobermory, ON (source WSP).......................................................55 Figure 13 1 : Regulatory sign examples..............................................................................................................56 iv I ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 • • • 0 INTRODUCTION Trails have been a part of the fabric of Elgin -St. Thomas for several decades. Local municipalities, conservation authorities and agencies such as Ontario Parks have been building and maintaining trails on lands they own and manage. Some have developed local master plans and have been moving forward with implementation as opportunities and funds become available. Local trail groups have also taken the initiative to imagine and implement trails on lands they have secured access to, and in some cases acquired. Regional trail routes such as the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail and the Great Trail (Trans Canada Trail) have been designated through the County and widely promoted. Elgin County has a unique quality of place with rural landscapes,waterfronts, waterfront living and recreation. Recently, the County and its local municipal partners have been investing in, and strengthening the tourism sector. Attracting new residents to Elgin, including retirees and talented young workers who are leaving the large cities and seeking a more affordable and enjoyable lifestyle is one of the pillars of County's tourism and economic development strategy. A County-wide trail strategy presents a significant opportunity to work in a comprehensive, collaborative and coordinated manner to build upon all the hard work that has been previously completed, and to leverage the 4441 experience and expertise of all who have contributed to these efforts. The Elgin County Trail Study is intended to be a guide for future development, to build on the trail work and initiatives that have already taken place and to enable those responsible for the design, development and implementation of trails to use a consistent guideline and resource to enhance trail infrastructure, CHAPTER 1.0 1 INTRODUCTION ' 1n4o r improve overall route connectivity, overcome barriers while highlighting and preserving areas of natural and cultural significance. Seven local municipalities comprise Elgin County, specifically the: Town of Aylmer; Municipality of Bayham; Municipality of Central Elgin; Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich; Township of Malahide; Municipality of Southwold; Municipality of West Elgin; and The City of St. Thomas, which is geographically located in Elgin County but is a separated City. The following report summarizes the approach used to develop the Elgin County Trails Strategy as well as guiding resources and references to help with future trail planning, design and implementation initiatives undertaken by Elgin County and its partners. ild ' !'}• Y kt ir Steen ��. Conservation Source: 2018 2 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 1.0 � INTRODUCTION �� e4 I VISION FOR TRAILS IN ELGIN COUNTY The vision for trails and supportive objectives and recommendations contained in the Trails Study are intended to form the blueprint for the future trail network. They are intended to illustrate long-term objectives supported by initiatives on how to achieve them. The vision for • County is: "TRAILS ARE A VALUED ASSET IN ELGIN COUNTY. THEY The vision is supported by a set of objectives. Objectives provide more clear direction on what is intended to be achieved and how it will be achieved. The following are the objectives for the Elgin Study which were defined by the County and its partners: PROVIDE RESIDENTS AND VISITORS OFALL AGES AND ABILITIES THE OPPORTUNITY TO ENJOY NATURAL BEAUTY, RICH HISTORYAND UNIQUE QUALITY OF LIFE. WITH MANY PARTNERS WORKING TOGETHER, WE CREATE A DI VERSE NETWORK OF TRAI LS FROM RECREATION AND TRANSPORTATION ROUTES IN URBAN CENTRES TO SPECTACULAR DESTINATION TRAILS THE RURAL COUNTRYSIDE". UNDERSTAND THE CURRENT STATE OF TRAILS THROUGHOUT EL Lai IN WiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII REVIEW LOCAL POLICIES 190111 PLANS INFLUENCING 2 TRAIL DEVELOPMENT oilCONSULT WITH THE PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDERS 4 RECOMMEND ACOUNTY-WIDE TRAIL NETWORK DEVELOP GOALS, PRIORITIES, COSTS AND STRATEGIES 5 FOR IMPROVING EXISTINEVEN 2 11111114,1111114 IG TRA11 ILS REVIEW SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING ELGIN 6 SOURCES COUNTY TRAILS STUDY • • r CHAPTER • 1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 TRAILS STUDY PROCESS Through the Healthy Communities Partnership, Southwestern Public Health received funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada to develop the Elgin County Trails Study. A study team consisting of trail specialists from WSP Canada Group Limited, land securement specialists at Orland Conservation, and the strategic planning firm DeLoyde Development Solutions were retained to complete the study. The study was initiated in May 2018 and involved the 3 phases and key tasks described on the following page. The study team was guided by a Technical Advisory Committee consisting of staff representatives from the County, the Local Municipalities and Southwestern Public Health. The study team met with the Technical Advisory Committee at key points during the development of the study to review findings and recommendations. INITIATION I • 2018 UNDERSTANDING THE RESOURCES: ► Develop study vision, objectives & route selection criteria ► Review background information & mapped existing conditions ► Conduct best practice review of trail planning and design ► Prepare consultation strategy and engagement materials, and launch online engagement program No. Prepare trail route selection principles No. Identify network opportunities and barriers ► Prepare draft candidate route network 2018 Iq DEVELOPING THE PLAN: ► Complete field investigations to review and understand candidate route opportunities and constraints ► Host the Public Information Centres ► Develop, confirm and refine the recommended trails network ► Develop trail design guidelines ■TEMBER - NOVEMBER 2018 FINALIZING THE PLAN: No. Summarize and incorporate public and stakeholder input into the Trails Study ► Prepare the draft and final Trails Study report. 4 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 1.0 1 INTRODUCTION r 1.3 REPORT OVERVIEW The intent of the Elgin County Trails Report is to provide staff and partners with a resource to support future decision making, planning and design as well as preliminary resource allocation. The content of the report has been developed based on input provided by staff and stakeholders and provides tools, strategies and guidance based on best practices and lessons learned from comparable municipalities. The following is an overview of the information contained within the report. CHAPTER 1 .0 An overview of the key principles of the Trails Study and the development/project process used to develop the report and trails network. e-=!No Support for Trails; which summarizes key local and provincial policy that supports trail development and promotion. CHAPTER 3wA -rdri M The Trail Network;which includes the recommended trail network, and trail planning and design guidelines, and trail maintenance strategies. CHAPTER 4.0 Implementation Strategies; which includes recommendations regarding trail implementation priorities, funding and partnership opportunities. a - - ■ Conclusion,which includes a consolidation of key report recommendations. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 5 • 200 SUPPORT FOR TRAILS Chapter 2.0 provides the context from which the trails study was developed. More specifically, it outlines the existing support from a policy level, some of the benefits that can be realized with an increased focus and investment in trails and input that was generated through the consultation program which informed the study. 2.1 PROVINCIAL & LOCAL POLICY Trail development and promotion is supported by policy and plans at the Provincial and Local level of government. As part of the development of the Trails Study, it was important to develop an understanding of the policies and plans that exist and their influence on the development of the trail network, promotion and marketing initiatives. A detailed summary of the policies reviewed is found in Appendix I A. The following are recommendations established from the policy review. CHAPTER 2.0 1 SUPPORT FOR TRAILS 2.2 BENEFITS OF TRAILS There are many benefits which can be realized from developing and implementing trails. Benefits are experienced at a very individual level as well as at a wider County-wide level. Trail benefits will be unique to each community, however, some of the common potential outcomes have been identified below. 111111h, HEALTHY COMMUNITIES FV the following are a few basic facts borrowed from the Public Health Agency of Canada website. https://www.canada.ca/en/public- health.html. ► For children (5-11 yrs.) and youth (12-17 yrs.) physical activity is essential for healthy growth and development. Regular physical activity during childhood and youth years helps to develop cardiovascular fitness, strength and bone density and prevent chronic diseases such as some types of cancer, Type 2 diabetes and heart disease later in life. ► For adults (18-64 yrs.) physical activity has been shown to reduce the risk of over 25 chronic conditions, including coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension, breast cancer, colon cancer, Type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis. Regular physical activity and higher levels of fitness allow daily tasks to be accomplished with greater ease and comfort and with less fatigue. Research shows that as much as half the functional decline between the ages of 30 and 70 is due not to aging itself but inactive lifestyle. ► For older adults (65 yrs. and older) weight-bearing physical activity reduces the rate of bone loss associated with osteoporosis, and regular physical activity maintains strength and flexibility, balance and coordination, and can help reduce the risk of falls. ► There is also a growing body of research linking community design, walkability, opportunities for physical activity such as hiking and cycling, and commuting to work using active transportation modes with mental and physical health. With growing urban areas, cost of real estate, increasing traffic congestion and ever-improving technology for remote and 'virtual' offices, people are making decisions about where they want to live based on quality of amenities nearby. A linked system of trails is just one of those amenities that factor into a decision about where one wants to live. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 7 r W CHAPTER 2.0 1 SUPPORT FOR TRAILS 2 � ENVIRONMENT Trails provide public access to Elgin County's natural and rural environments. Trails allow people to observe and enjoy wildlife such as migrating Tundra Swans as well as forests and wetlands. Sensitively constructed trails give residents and visitors an appreciation for Elgin County's natural areas and waterfronts throughout the seasons which in turn, helps promote a sustainability ethic. ECONOMIC DEV • ` •prlm&� -.& AL mmmd Trails across North America have created numerous economic benefits and opportunities for the communities that they pass through. Communities benefit from trail development through increases in business activity and by providing services to an increasing number of trail users. Trails provide benefits to the local economy first during construction, through the design, supply and installation of materials, then following construction, benefits emerge in the form of expenditures by trail users. Elgin County provides a unique and special place where residents live, work, and play. The County provides a wide range of local settings including small city, small town, rural and waterfront communities. Each setting provides residents with a unique lifestyles and economic opportunities. Contemporary Elgin County is more than the sum of its parts that include: its natural environment, built heritage, pastoral countryside, beach communities, cultural amenities, culinary assets, festivals and events, retail and support services. The County of Elgin recognizes the importance of tourism to community prosperity and economic development. Emerging demographic and economic trends dictate that the County must evolve with the changing times and economy. Tourism is a proven economic development tool that promotes new business opportunities and new revenues in the local economy. 8 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 2.0 1 SUPPORT FOR TRAILS Tourism generates jobs beyond the base employment levels needed to support the local community. Tourism helps local accommodation, retailers, and food and beverage companies thrive and grow year-round. Elgin County's beauty and other community assets will attract both investors and future residents. Elgin County is attracting new residents and attention from other population centres such as the nearby Greater Golden Horseshoe that is one of the fastest growing places in North America. These demographic and economic shifts allow Elgin County to leverage its trails, cultural, artistic, culinary, agribusiness, heritage, arts and other assets. In turn, such leverage generates new investment and revenues for local municipalities, businesses and entrepreneurs. Trails connect people to destination amenities and businesses in Elgin County. Cycling tourism is growing and Elgin County's landscape, communities and amenities is ideally suited for attracting cycling tourists. Bird watching and hiking are also increasingly popular leisure time activities for residents and visitors alike. Elgin County is in a strong position to market trails related tourism opportunities thus contributing to strengthening its local economy. r F rr r ... r � g _ F ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 9 r W CHAPTER 2.0 1 SUPPORT FOR TRAILS 2.3 WHAT WE HEARD FROM RESIDENTS & STAKEHOLDERS Consultation and engagement is a critical and required component of any planning study. It enabled the study team to understand the public's needs and priorities with respect to the issue that is being addressed. A multi-faceted engagement program was developed as part of the Elgin County Trails Study. The following is a summary of the consultation tactics and were used and key themes that emerged. A more detailed summary is provided in Appendix I B. 2.3.1 THE APPROACH A number of different consultation approaches were undertaken as a means of soliciting input from a variety of user groups. A total of three (3) engagement tactics were used to inform the development of the trails study. They are described in further detail below. • METROQUEST DESCRIPTION &PURPOSE: ■ ► An online interactive tool hosted on the Active Elgin website .��. .. '., ■.. �... .p��.m�... hMw•11..YY.YryeeHX..INf p.I.�RR.�f pRgy.M U. P.n'Afv Yuu.n4M.�R+A•r.b My.bmflr Fl�Ca..Ay fnWf IA.M i ► Hosted between May 2018 and mid-July 2018 ► Three activities were used to gather input including an interactive map, a visioning tool and the selection of b.eYb[mn design preferences 7 IN-PERSON: POP-UP _ f 0 f r ' r � 1 10 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 2.0 1 SUPPORT FOR TRAILS IN-PERSON: D. 2.3.2 KEY THEMES Some unique and very informative input was gathered. The information was reviewed and key themes and common trends emerged including: A DESIRE FOR TRAILS- SMALLER THAT CONNECT COMMUNITIES . . IF F PLACES WITHIN THE LACKING IN OFF- F, COUNTYROAD TRAILS AN UNDERSTANDING MANY RESIDENTS OF POTENTIAL FOR ECO-TOURISM OF COUNTYWITHIN THE • . COUNTY,r THAT EXISTS IN THE ■ BETTER SIGNAGE BECAUSE OF LO OF OR WOULDF AND MAPPING HELPFUL • . . . The key themes allowed the project team to understand shortfalls of the existing trails network and focus on the elements that were identified as key priorities. The key themes also aided the project team in the development of network priorities, allowing for the prioritization of trails that addresses the public feedback. In addition, detailed comments were reviewed in the context of the trail network opportunities and constraints, the proposed trail network routes and trail promotion. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 11 • 300 THE TRAIL NETWORK Chapter 3.0 documents the network development approach that was used to identify the proposed trail network for Elgin County. The process that was used is an iterative step by step process that is based on best practices and lessons learned throughout Ontario. The chapter also provides an overview of some of the key assumptions and consideration that were used to inform the network development process including the types of trail users that were considered and the criteria / principles used to identify route preferences. 12 r CHAPTER 3.0 TRAILS NETWORK • • WALKERS: Have a wide range of interests and motivations for walking, including leisure, relaxation, socializing, exploring, connecting with nature, fitness, and dog walking. Walkers can be defined by their trip type including recreational or utilitarian. Utilitarian walkers are focused on urban areas and most often make walking trips to work, school and to run errands such as shopping. Utilitarian walkers will use trails in urban areas where they provide a convenient "short cut" as compared to nearby sidewalks. HIKERS:are often considered the elite of the recreational walking group and may challenge themselves to cover long distances and be willing to walk on sections of a rural roadway shoulder + considered less safe or less interesting by occasional leisure walkers. Trip length can range between 5 and 30 km in length. This group may be more keenly interested in connecting with nature and natural heritage conservation.They are often more experienced at map reading, are more self-sufficient than leisure walkers. Therefore, they may expect fewer amenities and are often attracted to challenging terrain and rural areas. This group can include cross- country skiers/snowshoers when there is sufficient snow during winter months. RUNNERS:Although the primary motivation forjoggers and runners may be fitness, they may share more in terms of profile characteristics with distance hikers than they do with leisure walkers. This group typically is accomplishment oriented, enjoy travelling on trails at higher speeds for distances from 3 to 15 km or more, often avoiding hard surfaces such as asphalt and concrete. Many prefer to run on granular, natural (earth) and turf surfaces which can provide a more cushioning effect on their joints. • • - r CHAPTER , TRAILS • NETWORK CYCLISTS:The average travel speed for a cyclist on a trail is in the range of 15-20 km/h,though they may reach speeds in excess of 30 km/h traveling downhill on some trails. Some bicycles are designed to travel easily over stonedust and gravel surfaces (e.g. all-terrain, hybrid or mountain bikes),whereas, narrow-tired touring and racing bicycles require very compacted granular surfaces or hard surface 00 pavements • OTHER WHEELED group includes in-line skaters, skateboarders and other trail users with small-wheeled devices. They have characteristics of both the pedestrian group as they are sometimes traveling at a walking pace,yet sometimes traveling at higher speeds. They use trails for recreation, exercise and transportation purposes. A key requirement of this group is the need for • -• 3.2 TRAIL ROUTE SELECTION PRINCIPLES A key foundation of any network development process is the identification of a set of route selection principles which are used to "assess" various trail candidates. The principles were identified based on project objectives and community priorities. The Trail Route Selection Principles outlined in Tablet were identified and used for the Elgin County Trails Study. Table 11 Summary of Elgin County Trail Route Selection Criteria CRITERIA DESCRIPTION CONNECTED/ Trails should provide residents and visitors with connections to key LINKED destinations. The trail should also connect to the County's overall active transportation network. EASY TO trails should be easy to find and accessible from various locations ACCESS throughout the County, specifically major destinations and residential areas. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... COST the cost to implement and maintain a trail should be affordable EFFECTIVE and appropriate in scale and coordinated with other infrastructure opportunities where applicable. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 i � r CRITERIA DESCRIPTION SUSTAINABLE sustainability is an important consideration for trail location, alignment and design, materials, operation and maintenance. COMFORT& reducing risk to users and providing routes and facilities that make SAFETY people feel comfortable based on user interests and preferences must be considered with new trail link proposals/opportunities. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... VISIBLE trails should be a visible component of the County and local municipal transportation systems. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... CONTEXT trails will be designed to be consistent with best practices but may SENSITIVE be adjusted for locations with unique features or site-specific constraints. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... trails should appeal to a range of users with varying abilities and DIVERSE interests, therefore, the trail network should be comprised of a variety of trail types and locations. ....... ........ ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... recreational trails will be designed to be accessible and meet the ACCESSIBLE requirements of the Ontarians with Disabilities Act and local municipal trail accessibility standards where they exist. trails should take advantage of attractive and scenic areas, views ATTRACTIVE & and vistas. They should encourage participation in local tourism INTERESTING and highlight significant destinations. Following the completion of the study, the principles should be referred to when trail routes are being refined during the detailed feasibility stage, when changes to the trail network are being considered, or when new trail link opportunities arise. Use the Route Selection Principles when undertaking detailed route feasibility assessments for trail linkages R20 F identified as part of the trails network or when network FF routing changes are being considered. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 15 CHAPTER ■ • NETWORK 3.3 TRAIL NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Four steps were followed in developing the recommended trail network presented later in section 3. The following tables describes each of the steps. COLLECT ■•UND INFORMATION ► Using base information provided by the municipalities, partners and stakeholders, the study team consolidated and digitally mapped existing previously planned trail facilities, and trails planned in association with new development areas around several of the urban areas. ► A set of qualitative route selection principles were developed to guide the selection of trail routes. The principles were reviewed with the study team, technical advisory committee as well as stakeholders and the public through the online and in-person public engagement. (refer to section 3.2). SELECT D. .• ROUTE 11111, ► Candidate routes were identified and mapped by the study team. Once presented and reviewed the routes were refined based on the following information: ► Consolidated base mapping; ► Route Selection Principles; No. Consultation with the technical advisory committee; ► Expertise of the study team; ► consultation with stakeholders and the public; and No. Desktop analysis using the GIS database and aerial imagery provided by the technical advisory committee. 16 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 ■ I Ir L CHAPTEP 3.0 TPAILS ■ . ! 1 r FIELD INVESTIGATION & DEVELOP TRAIL ROUTING ► The study team examined candidate routes in the field and collected additional information including photographs that helped to inform the development of the trails network concept. Due to the size of the County some additional field investigation was also conducted to verify a number of routes and opportunities. • ► The route network concept was further refined using the Route Selection Principles and information collected in the field. The mapping was also refined based on the technical expertise of the study team as well as input from the public, stakeholders and technical advisory committee. ► Potential connections on privately owned lands were not investigated in the field as part of the study. Should the opportunity arise in the future, routes on private lands should be investigated further through discussions between the .0 County/local municipality and the land owner, with the goal to engage in an access agreement with the landowner. RECOMMEND TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITIES ► The Implementation Plan was developed to respond to priorities identified by the study team, technical advisory committee, stakeholders and the public. • ► Note that as part of the implementation of individual routes in the future, a more detailed assessment will be needed to confirm the route alignment at the appropriate time.This would include the preparation of a cost estimate to inform capital budgets, seek external funding opportunities and approval by the appropriate municipal Council. Unit costs presented in Appendix I C can be used to assist in the development of estimated implementation costs for individual routes. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 17 CHAPTER ■ • NETWORK 3.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS Due to the extensive work that Elgin County and its partners have done in the recent years, there is an comprehensive network of existing as well as previously proposed trails from which this trails study is building upon. In addition, there are also challenges and opportunities which need to be addressed. The following sections provide an overview of these elements. 3.4.1 OPPORTUNITIES & CHALLENGES The development of the trails network in Elgin County presents a number of opportunities and challenges, including the following: OPPORTUNITIES 1 DESIRED CONNECTIONS: RESOURCES: Beaten paths, foot trails, and Implementation takes time and abandoned trail corridors found budget. It is challenging to throughout the settlement areas balance additional budget and and natural areas of the County. budget for existing services. COMMUNITY SUPPORT: COORDINATION: 2. There is a desire on the part of 2. Integrating a new planning residents for the County to process requires coordination improve and expand the trail which will require clarity on network currently in place. expectations and roles. GEOGRAPHY:30 The county is a large area with different landscapes and land uses. These require a tailored solution for unique constraints. POLICY: 46 Current policies are high-level which require amendments to consider trails planning and design at the day to day level. GUIDELINES: 5. Common design guidelines are lacking which result in inconsistency in trail design and application. 18 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 Ir L CHAPTEP TPAILS ■ . 1 r 3.5 THE RECOMMENDED TRAIL NETWORK The trail network in Elgin County is an amalgamation of many trail types and partners. It is a combination of: Trail routes, loops and networks in a number of the urban areas including St. Thomas, Alymer, Belmont and Port Stanley, Destination trails in the rural areas, including those in Conservation Areas, Provincial Parks and on Crown lands, Regional trails that travel through the County and connect with trails in neighbouring counties and municipalities, and Trail opportunities, some of which have the potential to form trail spines and regional trails in the County-wide network. 3.5.1 THE TRAILS NETWORK The proposed Elgin County trails network is illustrated on Maps 3.0 to 3.8. Table 2 provides a summary of existing and proposed trail network. Table 2 1 Trail Network Statistics PROPOSED --]I MUNICIPALITY Aylmer 4 3.7 7.7 .... .... B a y h a m 64.0 17.0 80.8 Central Elgin 57.8 20.3 78.1 ................................................._ _....................................................... ......... ........._ ................................................... Dutton/Du nwich 49.2 17.0 66.2 ... Malahide .... 46.8 I�.....................................................2.1............................................................................................... 48.9 Southwold ....... _ 67.5 ..27.9 ...........................................95.3 ....... . .. ............................................ St. Thomas 43.3 11.0 54.3 ... West Elgin .... 38.9 ............................................._20.5......................................................................................... 59.5 Total 371.5 119.4 490.8 Notes: 1. Includes existing trails on lands owned by municipalities and public agencies (e.g. Conservation Authorities,the Provincial and Federal government.Also includes existing trails located on private property that have been established through agreements with individual landowners (i.e.applies to the Elgin Hiking Trail and some sections of the designated Great Trail/Trans Canada Trail) 2. Includes the (a) designated Great Trail/Trans Canada Trail route, (b)Great Lakes Waterfront Trail and (c) Elgin Hiking Trail. Portions of(a) and (b) are on-road,and some portions of(a) may not have been implemented.The Elgin Hiking Trail (c) is mapped based on information provided by stakeholders,and the entire route of the Elgin Hiking Trail could not be verified in the field. 3. Includes proposed routes identified during the development of the Elgin County Trail Study and proposed routes identified in previously approved local master plans such as the St.Thomas Trail Master Plan and Central Elgin Trails Master Plan. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 19 Elgin CountyStudy � r e N Map 3-O n Proposed Trail Network A Elgin g n County t t ' " Legend 'T Trails h - — Elgin Hiking Trail Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) Great Lakes Waterfront Trail City Of London A DRIVE Municipal and Conservation Area �O�r Oxford County Trails -- Proposed Trails' ���►�___ Destination Areas 7�i Conservation Areas Malah'de _ N M��IL LIN /y Municipal Parks ED�N Li Provincial Parks Thoi , ,.- er ayharYl Lakes and Watercourses k Middlesex County, _ ¢ s Beach d ° Z �� J HN E L N lax (V CommunityCentre Central Elgin CA(>} C V Conservation Area � % j Q j 1 LINE n Q Provincial Park �tfo �-DunwW �� '�— � o aJD XTER LINQ Seniors'Centre sr FL R/F `< j school <� ° LLNF Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ g inQ� Q Abandoned) 1.Proposed Tra'Is include previously proposed tra Is from other approved municipal master plans and Trails proposed as part of the Elgin County Trail.Study, °o°JV Lake Erie �aosa ar,1'1�-ry: N,rya9'�111 ����'d�fe,,�s,�.rne Municipality of 6,att am-Kertt �ANo A 10 20 40 ACTMFLGIN km ® Et61n,- u1u) public Health Elgin County Trails Study i 41 r N Map 3-1 A Proposed Trail Network j Town of Aylmer o Legend I ° Q Trails O it Trans W — Elgin Hiking Trail —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) in w w W Great Lakes Waterfront Trail U N O Municipal and Conservation Area Trails w -- Proposed Trails' Destination Areas W ~ = Conservation Areas Township of z Township of Municipal Parks Malahide — - w Malahide ° w Q Provincial Parks CONSERVATION O ROTARY AREA -7 M Lakes and Watercourses PARK Z _ �C _ -- - - s Beach r = Z � w (1) Community Centre TALBOT LINE TALBOT ST EET WES KINSMEN O NG� Q m Conservation Area Q Provincial Park © Seniors'Centre soSTREET WEST f, School — — — — — AVLMER ° IK STREE FA1R uNO5 Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ p - 1— J Abandoned) _ > 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other Lu 1 j /�1/ approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of LLU z w Q `I`n0� the Elgin County Trails Study. .�.a CT � Q = w P 1 e.ep er,Eei�o ry 3tl c P I� > 1II rlaN.,e,eNed.Na.Play I— QQ � N I All a„nnR"__ .adaaloPaaa„I mrne U Z an.Isr.,mmesie,,. _ Z _ Z - - Na:N,PIe el d dIr-s-, -Z� 2 BROOK LINE ~ O ARKCONSER L Gp\` AREA vATION LAND 0 0.5 1 2 ACTIVEELGIN `J ^�,'• km ®�F3F�© �� Elgin<<III,IIy Public Health Elgin • unty Trails Study leg � Oxford County N N Map 3-2 Straffordville n Proposed Trail Network Municipality of Bayhoin) 13E as2�� Legend O�� a srREE Trails COLLEGE LINE �T�� — Elgin Hiking Trail O —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail Q ❑ --� AIN TR ET HE----,LINE Municipal and Conservation Area V opvlu � Q BOARDWALK LINE Trails Z -- ProposedTrails' Ili w B VIV N INE Q r Y C1 ABC C�NF a 3 Destination Areas r` [� Conservation Areas 0 0.5 l Municipal Parks Township o Malahide Q m Provincial Parks ❑ O Lakes and Watercourses Q Q1 B Beach J Cr w ]A S LAVE 2 S � Community Centre _rN F Conservation Area ❑ g I Norfolk Courty 0 Provincial Park ON o © seniors'Centre Er N� Port Burwell j school J r+E Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ ?� Abandoned) Q �i�N <�C r/ 1.proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other N Nq L�N� 7 Y approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of C = the Elgin County Trails Study. we e.rmegwsvunem cmuvumiw. rC/N C r a�ogl�a�d.— F NFL r N .N e r r rh 4� - iran�re .a.rto .. .... . NE a�ryo=` �Aada ,--- .�rr�� -.Gf 000t�rl�uerr 1 0 .s 5 'ID O 2 ACFWRELGIN iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikm (pM kSg1n Elgin • • • t J N Map 3-3 Belmont Twa>shlpul Proposed Trail Network MA lN� �� /: Fplahlde Municipality of Central Elgin City of Lo�ldon � t�tt :AVWWrtHLegend JpT1 LANENON S-CA£ Trails E O 7� r L. f'o r O +r�1AtA i„a,;ppj�� n° — Elgin Hiking Trail � —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trai Great Lakes Waterfront Trail O _D�ys a1 ERGUSO LINEMunicipal and Conservation Area Township of Malehide+ �I,: Trails KRl - Proposed Trails' A" RON MC VEIL LINE -eaLIECE UNEr'- Destination Areas O Port Stanley S N C] Conservation Areas 1 Y = Municipal Parks O N LINE � Provincial Parks u_�K_ELINE - Lakes and Watercourses f ETr -` - - _ __ Town9mp of at �TAt�T LI soutbwold ■ Beach . a-_ ��' � Q r o c � � Community Centre �GP fi` -� AN Q sTeE� S; m Conservation Area 8 . m b 1 ��• � Q Provincial Park Ix _rr r NE aaa. 67 e s r ( 'Bi srww © seniors'Centre Ix a �r r school Sri Q 0 0.75 1.5 V I JOHN WI LINE km Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ Abandoned) RUIT R DGE LINE C i 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other pprowd Township of v.n xoum the Elgin County Trails studal teryians and trails proposed as part of Lynhurst 5ou wofill �e^��•4�• SPAR LINE OI wmahlp O}:7 S 1,1—in rvmremsngmssywseon.mcpuo um�w. Itt1YWd T1i c eaa by sigin cqunry.xm,. UNI��N GOAD Q an,,11 q a ."mth. ROB RT5 LINE �•� 4 6ECKL � wAr:F RVTo °sc,6��m^e1" 'tl.w.ua ww.h �KF-l1P1E DEXTER LINE a ahfMBt � �°•"" �_. 93 r —ALROTSTri�£T L IN .�..r�..�• o 2.5 5 10 0' 1.25 2.5 -- Elgin, PuhllicHeaft • • is Elgin � Map 3-4 ;Dutton Proposed Trail Network Municipality of Dutton-Dunwich 0k. 9 _ O Legend iF ,, 9'QT Middlesex County "OR sTq� ° yG� Trails F mF sr — Elgin Hiking Trail T MILLER qp —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) �0 5 —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail Township off 7 m C� SouthwoldYA C Municipal and Conservation Area N, �0 OFF Trails T CP fG 0G -P, �r r -- ProposedTrailsl ` '9 rC a WC � Destination Areas CONSERVATION d . o Conservation Areas AREA , 4 'nq�� 0 0.5 1 km Municipal Parks OS� Provincial Parks Lakes and Watercourses G sovrHwoLa s Beach EARTNWORNS Community Centre V Conservation Area ti Munlcipailty of �4r ts, +$�� Q Provincial Park West =19in � Q Seniors'Centre School Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ FINGAL LIN Abandoned) ff 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of V the Elgin County Tralls Study. PMK al,E�o nP%',aa o �. . . �❑ Ary 9S, o .man ,^d,. Lake EftO -�Ap V 0 2,5 10 LGIFJ Elgin • • • • ` � J N N Map 3-5 Oxford County p n Springfield Proposed Trail Network N Township of Malahide G•11r 1 MALADE Y^ C4G m COMMUHINITVPLACE Legend _ V L• ET ; j Trails Y "EL9O"SIR � PRESSEY LINE — Elgin Hiking Trail —w ILSON t�NE MAM SIRE B O SXR' —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) �$11N EEZ —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail fiI Ly0 ysSR TRUMAN LINE - F Municipal and Conservation Area ON TREET Trails IN -- Proposed Trails MAPL=TpN LING��yLL1yyE BEST LINE Destination Areas ROB LEGE L NE y = Conservation Areas 1111— 0 0:5 1 = Municipal Parks LDLIPE O - km ENT AREA Q Provincial Parks EDGEWARE LINE Q O r] GL I0-OLIN LINE pL Lakes and Watercourses � LU ■ Beach TALBOT LINE Q 41 < p ID Community Centre ?� -� Q Ll O rX O j (V Conservation Area O EX n< V Q LU w Municipality of Q Provincial Park w SOUTH DALE LINE 6FRINCW (LL] j � Bayhan Q N © Seniors'Centre W VA ' V Port Bruce n r School CONSER Z AREA Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ Municipality of N WISE LINE y w ti Abandoned) Central Elgin 2 RUSH CREEK LINE 1.Proposed Trails Include previously proposed trails from other Q F IMPERIAL ROAD d municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of approve pa propo At TON the Elgin County Trails Study. a -CAII TON LIFEA�Mp SPARTA LINE �� Q p "„`e PTn'obm:em,gai. Y q ,� t.a y ,r, .-V.M7n.a a by aigin cunry,xm. c �'IEN ALINE o O C 119—. dad n.1d.,...- CIECibgf&J. 0 a J d ENS Q 0 ... NO A SCOTIA LINE U O O _ y�1 N a Q DE L PROVINCIAL PARK 0 2.s. 8 fa o 0.5 1 ACTIVEELGIN km km �EWEMM � Elgm Elgin • • e • Q�,e OR N Map 3-6 Shedden Proposed Trail Network A A Township of Southwold Middlesex County LINELegend Trails oy — Elgin Hiking Trail —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) P �� c/ssTRF `As"� —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail G Fr Municipal and Conservation Area Trails �� -- Proposed Trails' Q 4 Destination Areas = Conservation Areas 0 = Municipal Parks d km I Provincial Parks _�__ ,?• 'L �d Lakes and Watercourses s Beach CommunityCentre �J (C utii z t� (V Conservation Area Q Provincial Park� © Seniors'Centre sG �; Mun ipality j school of Contral �� Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ j0 [��lO�R aY� Abandoned) OqjD 1.Proposed Trails plas ladtansa tri srsptnapprrovednicipamterplans proposea part the Elgin County Trails Study. r►� FlNC-ALWI FE MANAGEM 7 ff AREA Municipality of �g .d amp o��„:= G Dutron-Dunwich _� =ryosa; o .�an.,^dr,a me y\ OLANU Lake Wi, D 2.5 5 t l ���_'.'• km r � lilgNti •.�I HawitFt Elgin County Trails Study - 3-7 RON MCNEIL LINE N MapProposed Trail Network • - — - �\NE, ` °� o w City of St.Thomas I�° Legend c Municipality of w- e9Q Central Elgin _ a Trails U WATER TOWER LINE DALEWOOO ♦ > — Elgin Hiking Trail CONSERVAs ON EDGE W E LINE —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) BLS � I m FT W I = —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail 3 • WATERWORK V IN BARK 9Q ♦� ��_ 2 Municipal and Conservation Area PLO B`CK LI, UTH ED�/AR ROAD Trails L -- Proposed Trails' -,--' T `'� - - Destination Areas _ IC EDWAR STREET o Conservation Areas Municipal Parks - Provincial Parks - _ - Municipality of —a Lakes and Watercourses CE19T$•REET _ Central Elgin s Beach R ET R K _ - -ELLINGTON S PEE 0 Community Centre Conservation Area Z -- w -- ,[ PARK Q Provincial Park F - j C ES NU REET Z © Seniors'Centre School _ - (1 Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ -QO m 1 STRE ELM LINE ° Abandoned) Proposed uns iniasereplanldtan, pan appro.d o include previously propo..d pa of Q the Elgin County Trails Study. RPLEWOOD LU Township of — AFORE 1 _emu p� pm�a Me,,MPG.n:a Southwold PARK -,Q- a ° z a.F1,I. WM,— ARET `��' 1 =1 = ,ryo95a:CY ;m o ;�� RLEx ix X SOUTHDA ' IN j = F O LU > Municipality df ---I LAND o �l0.�5 1L5 3 Central Elgin - AeTiVELLciN �((1'^••• km11 -'... t3Gfl=•r3i9f!® ElgmCu�nt� Pu61icH�alkh n .�KKE�tl r Elgin County Trails Study I'AN 0 Map 3-8 N West Lorne N Proposed Trail Network Municipality of West Elgin Legend (Sti c 'o STq ti RF o sr SFr Trails Middlesex Count ti �s T . °o AFF y Fs y� %%ri, — Elgin Hiking Trail ���� —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) " < \- O�001,0 Great Lakes Waterfront Trail Municipal and Conservation Area — Trails Ak 'oe Proposed Trails 4 Destination Areas � 7�i Conservation Areas � r Municipal Parks \G Provincial Parks 0 Lakes and Watercourses Beach Community Centre ta` 4t' V Conservation Area �p /' Q Provincial Park ^Q4 N © Seniors'Centre \Rodney �,�` n j School Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ �r4 CRODNEY OMMUNITY Abandoned) `¢q tt �o o° �% %CENTRE 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other IS �� �V sTR�r % approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of O # r the Elgin County Trails Study. 9 t? ti Municipality of Qp ""P' Chatham-Kent �O � ? �' e11E.l�,�a,l,ryro% � M1:aa o Lake Erie ti F T OJ ".0 PIP 1% AC77VVE1-GIN ��... i krn .1f11T �1 Elgln icFia�Rh CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • The proposed trail network in the Elgin County Trails Study should be used as a blueprint for future network R30 development and to inform next steps and trail priorities at the local municipal 3.5.3 UNDERSTANDING THE TRAILS NETWORK As the trail network is explained in more detail it is important to acknowledge that a "strict" trails plan inevitably will have issues related to connectivity and continuity. Due to the location and design of trail facilities i.e. off-road connections through natural areas, etc. it is likely impossible that a fully connected network of trails can be achieved.As such, the consultant team has relied on other trail and active transportation systems at the provincial, county local municipal and partner level to achieve overall connectivity throughout Elgin. The following is an overview of the different systems that make up the Elgin County Trails network to establish a greater understanding of the various layers. 1 . CYCLING ■ PLAN Given the rural nature of the majority of Elgin County it is recognized that creating a fully linked network of off-road trails is not likely possible. Cycling network routes identified in the Elgin County Cycling Master Plan and any future updates to that plan will be relied on for cyclists to get to destination trails. Although pedestrians may walk along road shoulders to get to a select number of destination trails, specifically those located near urban centres, it is assumed that they will arrive at destination trails via automobile. Therefore, staging areas with adequate parking and high-quality orientation mapping at each of the sites are important to creating a quality trail product. Regional trails have key role in the network, not only as an attractor themselves, but also as spines which link communities and provide connectors to smaller local trails in the urban areas. There are three existing regional trails within the County. 20 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 ■ i CHAPTEP 3.0 TPAILS NETWOPK 4A which generally follows Kettle Creek from Port Stanley to St. Thomas and then heads west along Dodds Creek to Paynes Mills, ultimately linking with the Thames Valley Trail near Southwold. The Elgin Hiking Trail was established by the Elgin Hiking Trail Club, and the route has been developed through access agreements with owners of the private lands through which the trail passes. (formerly known as the Trans Canada Trail), which enters Elgin County south of Tillsonburg, travels south to Port Burwell, then west to Alymer, primarily along quieter municipal roads and some County roads. Through Alymer the route utilizes the Town's park and open space system associated with Catfish Creek. Heading west into St. Thomas via the road network, the trail links the downtown core of the City before heading southwest to generally follow the Lake Erie shoreline by way of Municipal and County roads, and some links along privately-owned lands in Dutton-Dunwich based on agreements with individual landowners. 91317061IFFER ' which generally traces the Lake Erie shoreline, entering Elgin County along Glen Erie Line from neighbouring Norfolk County and exiting the county along Talbot Line west of Port Glasgow.The route passes though Port Burwell, Port Bruce and Port Stanley. In addition to these regional trails there are also several corridors that offer future potential regional trail opportunities. These opportunities are described in further detail on the following pages. • • • C • • • • • • - 1116191 O ' • • K t ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 21 CHAPTER ■ • ■ • • • ` ` • • Originally opened in 1873 this former railway corridor stretched from Fort Erie to Amherstburg. East of St. Thomas the corridor is no longer intact, with many portions having been severed and sold. West of St. Thomas the corridor is intact, and currently under the ownership of a single utility company. There have been recent discussions between the County and owner of the corridor to explore the potential for its use as a trail, through a partnership or other formal arrangement. On the west side of St. Thomas the former CASO line crosses the Kettle Creek Valley with a massive trestle, approximately 28m high and 420m long. The railway trestle and a portion of the former railway corridor was purchased by On Track a not-for-profit group with a vision to preserve the massive trestle structure and re-purpose it into the St. Thomas Elevated Park. Once developed it could become a national and international destination for rail, trail and cycling enthusiasts. The corridor crosses into Chatham-Kent, passing just north of Ridgetown, then through Tilbury where it enters Essex County. Within Chatham- Kent, plans are in place to develop a recreational trail in the corridor. In Essex County a trail has already been developed for most of the section west of the urban area of the town of Essex to Amherstburg. ;s (L E FT) CASO CORRIDOR FROM WEST LORNE (WSP, 2018) (RIGHT) INTERPRETIVE PLAQUE NEAR ENTRY TO ELEVATED PARK (WSP, 2018) :z i a' 22 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 Ir L CHAPTEP , TPAILS • ■ opened in 1902 and operated between Port Burwell to Tillsonburg until 1987, after y' which it was abandoned by the railway and acquired by the Town of Tillsonburg. t t It currently hosts the hydro transmission line for the Erie Shores Wind Farm. The corridor is recognized by Bayham as a trail from Port Burwell to Tunnel Line, and p offers the potential to continue a F . recreational trail northward to Tillsonburg. An extension of the trail north of Tunnel Line would also link Port Burwell to the communities of Vienna, Straffordville and FORMER Eden. RAI LWAY, ' • ♦ ' ♦ AIRLINE which began railway operations from Glencoe to Fort Erie in 1873. West of St. Thomas the corridor heads from Lynhurst, through Frome and Lawrence Station before entering Middlesex County. It is currently known as the CN Paynes subdivision and the tracks have been removed west of T',.ri.' ,1 John Wise Line. A portion of the corridor �.y in the northern part of Elgin County is � owned by a corporation interested in - developing a solar power farm. In 5 Middlesex County the potential use of the ='s corridor for trail/active transportation was • identified in the recently completed2018) Middlesex County Cycling Strategy. • • ♦ • ♦ ` ♦ ' which originally opened in 1856. It is currently owned by Port Stanley Terminal Rail; an operating tourist railway. Information received during the development of the Elgin County Trails Study indicated that Port Stanley Terminal Rail is not interested in a recreational trail within their corridor. Should circumstances change in the future this corridor may present an opportunity for a recreational trail. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 23 1 CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • TRAILS3. DESTINATION Kettle Creek, Catfish Creek, Long Point, Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authorities, Ontario Parks and Ministry of Natural Resources are owners of significant tracts of natural heritage lands in the rural part of the municipality. Some of these lands contain very popular trail networks, including the following: ► Yarmouth Natural Heritage Area ► Springwater Forest Conservation Area No. Archie Coulter Conservation Area ► Dalewood Conservation Area ► Dan Patterson Conservation Area No. E.M Warwick Conservation Area No. John E. Pearce Provincial Park, including Backus Page House Museum and the Spicer Trail - owned and managed by Ontario Parks No. Fingal Wildlife Management Area, which is a Crown-owned property, and co-managed through a partnership agreement between the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Elgin Stewardship Council. Planning, design, implementation and management of trails on these lands takes ' place according to strategies, plans and guidelines of the owning agency and its }' partners (where applicable). The County/ local Municipalities can also have a partnership role by working cooperatively with these agencies to promote and market P the destination trails, and by developing connections to municipal trails where the - destinations are close to urban centres. In addition to those that contain formalized trails there are some destinations with few or no trails based on information gathered and field investigations by the study team. - Two examples include: ► Hawk Cliff FINGAL MANAGEMENT ► Dutton-Dunwich Conservation Area. WILDLIFE AREA (WSP, 2018) 24 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 3.6 PLANNING FOR TRAILS The future implementation of trail infrastructure and programs will require support from planning policy and process. There are also supportive land-uses and approaches that can be considered when planning around trails depending on the context in which they are being discussed. The following sections provide an overview of planning considerations for the Elgin Trails network as the County and its partners move forward with implementation. 3.6.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & TRAILS Integrating trails into the community as urban centres grow is very relevant in Elgin County. Urban centres such as St. Thomas, Alymer, Belmont, Lynhurst, Port Stanley and Dutton are experiencing growth and this trend is expected to continue. New development provides an opportunity to incorporate new trail linkages at the time of initial construction rather than at some future time when it can be more challenging. Trails are an integral part of the community fabric and an important part of the land development process. Many land developers recognize the value that trails bring to their projects and market their products accordingly. Providing the development industry with information about the proposed trail network at both the broader scale and in the context of their development will help to improve communication among all parties involved. Trail routes proposed in development applications be designed to overcome physical barriers, make appropriate connections to important destinations and enhance connectivity with the existing and planned trail system. Trails should be constructed concurrently with the construction of other infrastructure and homes. When trail implementation is deferred until homes are built there can be conflict when residents adjacent to planned trail corridors claim they were unaware of trail plans. Developers are encouraged to proactively engage potential buyers regarding the location of trails planned for their neighbourhood at the time of sale. Providing information at sales offices, including information in sales packages and erecting signs in locations where trails are to be constructed will help to alleviate challenges at a later date. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 25 CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • TRAIL • ILL Developers should be expected to work through an iterative process with municipalbeginning early in R40 the planning stages to create an appropriate trail network FF within their development • external trails where appropriate. ESTABLISHED�2. TRAILS IN i Implementing new trails in established neighbourhoods can be challenging even if the intent to do so has been clearly documented in strategic plans, especially where new trails are located close to existing homes. Even with extensive consultation efforts at the master plan stage it can be difficult to obtain public opinion related to specific trail segments until a project reaches the implementation stage. It can be at this stage where adjacent landowners who perceive themselves as being directly affected become more concerned and involved. Real and perceived concerns over increased pedestrian traffic, access to rear yards, invasion of privacy, and a perception that there may be an increased potential for vandalism and theft are often cited as key concerns. It is important to engage adjacent residents in an open, public consultation process at the earliest possible stages of the project. Genuine and effective communication can help to alleviate concerns and build support for the trail link. 26 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 r CHAPTER 3.0 1 TRAILS NETWORK ev Some keys to success include: ► Notifying adjacent landowners early in the process and taking the time to understand and respond to their concerns; ► Encouraging their participation in the design process through events such as local design workshops to determine trail layout, design, materials and privacy features, as well as site meetings to examine and refine proposed layouts; ► Emphasizing the benefits of trails for their neighbourhood and community, including themselves and their children; ► Demonstrating how the local trail link being proposed fits within the greater trail network in the short and long term; ► Emphasizing successful examples and effective solutions where similar problems were overcome. Different types of engagement may be required to advance a project through the detail design and implementation stages. The type of engagement and desired outcome varies depending on the project location, design approvals, scope and complexity of the project. The following are some different examples of how engagement can be designed to fit the project extent and complexity. NOTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION: Trail projects that: ► Are located entirely on public land (e.g. Municipal or County); ► Do not abut residential or commercial properties; ► Have all necessary planning and design approvals in place; and ► Have been tendered for construction; are good candidates for public notification by the municipality, indicating that it intends to proceed with construction. Notification should be ' published on the municipal website and other appropriate media such as the local newspaper. The notice should briefly explain the project; note that the project was previously approved, identify the expected construction start and end dates and provide a contact name and number for questions. It is suggested that the municipality wait for a specified period (e.g. 30 days) before commencing construction in case questions arise, giving the municipal project manager an opportunity to respond with the appropriate information. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 27 CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • 4 LOCAL NEIGHBOURHOOD MEETING: A Local Councillor or municipal staff may select to host a neighbourhood information meeting at the design stage for an upcoming trail project that has been identified in the Trail Study or other local policy plan. If the Councillor or Municipal staff believe additional consultation with the public is needed to address comments, a neighbourhood meeting could be convened to present the draft trail alignment and design details. This meeting may also serve to present proposed changes or solutions to the alignment or design from that was previously presented to area residents FOCUSED CONSULTATION AS PART OF DESIGN PROCESS: One outcome of the neighbourhood meeting may be significant revisions to the trail design. In this situation the municipality may select to undertake this work internally or secure the assistance of outside consultants, and may involve working meeting(s) with neighbourhood residents and stakeholders to identify, review and refine design changes. • If there is consensus to proceed, then the design should be finalized, any approvals secured, project tendered, notification of construction issued and then the project constructed. If consensus is not apparent, staff should be asked to report back to Council with a recommended course of action and request direction. Municipalities should review the suggested approaches for ongoing public participation for trails proposed in R50 established neighbourhoods and determine an appropriate approach on a project-by-project basis. 28 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTEP 3.0 1 TPAILS NETWOPK 4A 3.6.2 TRAILS & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The Municipal Engineers Association (MEA) Class Environmental Assessment Document (October 2000 as amended 2007) applies to municipal infrastructure projects. Recognizing that the environmental impact of projects varies due to a variety of factors the Environmental Assessment process classifies projects according to their relative environmental impact. The classification assists proponents of a project determine an appropriate assessment process by selecting an appropriate EA schedule. ■ • ► Generally, includes normal or emergency agency operational and maintenance activities; and ► The environmental effects of these activities are usually minimal and, therefore, these projects are pre-approved. • ► Generally, includes improvements and minor expansions to existing facilities; and ► There is the potential for some adverse environmental impacts and therefore the proponent is required to proceed through a screening process including consultation with those who may be affected. ► Generally, includes the construction of new facilities and major expansions to existing facilities; and ► These projects proceed through the environmental assessment planning process outlined in the Class EA. In October 2015 amendments to the MCEA were approved by the provincial government,which included amendments to, and clarifications regarding the EA Schedules. Previous editions of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment did not provide direction regarding multi-purpose pathways. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 29 ! CHAPTER OR Clarity is now provided in "Appendix 1-Cycling Changes to Project Schedules in the March 2015 Proposed Amendments". http://www.munic.,�alclassea.ca/files/Amendments/2015-10- 20%2OFinal%20MEA%2OAmendments.pdf Of the amendments to the schedule, the following are relevant to trails. ► Normal or emergency operation and maintenance of linear facilities now includes cycling lanes/multi-use pathways, sidewalks and parking and related facilities located within or outside of road rights-of-way. These are considered pre-approved Schedule A No. Construction or removal or sidewalks or multi-purpose pathways or cycling facilities within existing or protected rights-of-way. These are considered pre-approved Schedule A No. Construction or removal of sidewalks, multi-purpose pathways or cycling facilities including water crossings outside existing rights- of-way. Projects valued between $3.5 and $9.5M should adhere to Schedule B, and over$9.5M should adhere to Schedule C. Smaller projects are to follow a well-accepted and proven process. Schedule A and A+ projects are considered pre-approved and do not require a Class EA but require formal public notification at the commencement of the project. 3.6.3 TRAILS IN NATURAL AREAS Natural areas provide opportunities to enjoy and interpret nature, and participate in activities trail activities that may not be possible in more traditional parks. Striking the balance between providing public access and the need to conserve and/or protect the resource itself can be a difficult goal, especially in situations where there is an established urban area nearby or surrounding the feature. Where this is the case, this increases the pressure on the very resource that users seek and enjoy. Where trails are in natural areas it is important that they be properly aligned and designed, and the area is monitored for the effects of inappropriate use and/or overuse. Regular monitoring will alert trail managers to locations where users may be straying off the trail or taking short cuts so that mitigation strategies can be developed before significant damage to soils and vegetation occurs. If trails are not carefully planned, designed, constructed and maintained in these areas users will create their own desire line foot trails, sometimes in sensitive locations where it would be preferable not to have trails at all. 30 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 Ir L • ■ ■ , TPAILS • ■ Proper planning, design and construction of trails, coupled with public education can assist with creating the balance between use and protection. In some cases, trails and people should not be in sensitive natural areas. Vegetation communities that are highly sensitive to disturbance and narrow, constrained wildlife corridors are two examples where trails may not be appropriate. In these cases, it is advisable to provide alternative trail routes and information (e.g. signing, public information campaigns, etc.) explaining the management decision to exclude trails from the area. When designing trails through sensitive natural heritage features the following general considerations should include: ► Route or reroute to avoid the most sensitive and/or critical habitats No. Interpret sensitive species away from their location ► Consider and evaluate alternative routes and design treatments ► Use previously disturbed areas where possible and appropriate No. Maintain natural processes No. Incorporate habitat enhancements ► Complement and highlight natural features through interpretation. Where proposed trail routes pass through sensitive natural areas an Environmental Impact Study ` should be completed to assess the potential impact of the trail, identify mitigation strategies and design and construction requirements prior to approval. Planning for trails early in the development process 7 ensures that linkages are in the best locations and that they are implemented outside of the most • ; sensitive and protected environmental features. One solution to the challenge of placing trails -_ within environmental buffers is to dedicate linear trail blocks parallel to environmental buffers duringthe subdivision planning process. This enables construction of the trail as part of the development y of the neighbourhood when area grading is taking place. Dedicated blocks also allow homebuyers to clearly see planned trail locations and think about implications the trail may have on the use/enjoyment of their property prior to making a BUTTERMILK BOG TRAIL, purchase. OF DUTTON • 18) ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 1 31 ! NETWORKCHAPTER r 3.6.4 TRAILS AND LINEAR CORRIDORS Linear corridors offer potential to contribute to the future trail network in the County. Abandoned railway lines, unopened road allowances and utility corridors are primary examples of linear corridors that offer great potential for trails. ABANDONEDqm Railways are a significant part of Canada's transportation heritage, and they played a major role in shaping the communities that exist today. From approximately 1860 to the 1920's/1930's railway development flourished across the country. Villages, towns and cities grew up around railway lines as they were the main transportation arteries of the time. However, with advent and popularity of the automobile and the growing network of improved highways the economic vitality of railways gradually. Consolidation in the railway industry led to a decline in viability and use of some rail lines, and railway operators gradually disposed of rail corridors that were unprofitable. Many corridors were sold in pieces to adjacent landowners, while some remained intact. Intact corridors provide a significant opportunity for recreational trails and many other important infrastructure possibilities including future roadway, new/ revitalized railways, public and private utilities such as hydro, water/wastewater and communication lines. • UW 1q , r qb 'i �' 'NT.Opt Y % Sille CS Jill 0 BELMONT + � CC . Mil -00 04 CS 0CAL # l y .4 - O ;r C i I' � r �� � ■ Will .� O Jos •�il�*ff�}~+ �}}++Y:.�,4' v.• .•F' ■ ■ ♦ ■ ■ • ♦ • ■ • Clio 4 ■ • 1104 0 IM■ Lem■ ilm 32 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 OP i 4 Assembling land for a lengthy linear corridor in today's environment would be extremely challenging, time consuming and very expensive. Apart from the cost to acquire lands once identified, the time and expense associated with route identification, evaluation and # - _ selection as part of an Environmental Assessment (i.e. Individual EA) for assembly of a corridor in a greenfield condition would require a lengthy process and a significant amount of public engagement with no guarantee of a successful outcome. There are numerous examples across North America where local and regional governments and public agencies have taken over ownership of former railway corridors and re-purposed them into successful recreational trails and/or protected them for other future infrastructure possibilities. In Elgin County there are a few remaining intact railway corridors and access to these should be retained for the public benefit, whether this be through acquisition or partnership. interconnectPriority should be given to seizing opportunities to acquire former rail corridors for future linear trail development to R60 maximize the creation of off-road trail networks and . - . tourist destinations.2. • ' ROAD ALLOWANCES Similar in some ways to former railway corridors, unopened road allowances are a legacy of original township surveys dating back to the 1800's. In some cases, roads were never developed on these rights-of- way due to challenges such as topography, swamps, wide valleys and extensive watercourse crossings. In other locations seasonal roads were initially developed and later abandoned and never improved for vehicular travel. Some unopened allowances cross between one concession, whereas others are more extensive and cross several concessions. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 33 r CHAPTER ■ • • ■ In some parts of the County unopened road allowances may offer some potential to provide additional connections in the trail network. Partnerships with adjacent landowners and groups such as the Elgin Stewardship Council may help realize some of these potential opportunities. Unopened road allowances are part of our Ontario heritage R79 F and should be retained in public ownership in perpetuity FF for potential trails development. PF CORRIDOR Water, sewer, gas pipeline and hydro corridors through urban areas and new neighbourhoods as they are planned and developed are examples of linear corridors that provide excellent opportunities for trail development. In urban areas utility corridors i are often used as informal trail routes as evidenced by footpaths that evolve over _ time from continued use. These corridors _ often provide direct connections to destinations and cover long distances with few interruptions. An excellent recent example is the Orchard Park Trail in St. Thomas which now provides a 1.6 km long spine trail between Elm Street and ORCHARD PARK TRAIL FROM Southdale Line in the east part of St. ELM STREET - 2018) Thomas. Trails within hydro corridors trails are subject to approval by the owner/ authority which in many cases is Hydro One Networks Inc. Similarly, where trails are proposed within or crossing natural gas pipeline corridors approval is required. Consider opportunities that linear corridors such as unopened road allowances, utility corridors and abandoned railway corridors create for trails. Develop a R8 * F business case regarding the use of such corridors as part of the trail network before declaring no interest in them for — trail use. 34 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 RAILS WITH TRAILS j0d Md A portion of the active L&PS rail corridor has been developed into the Whistlestop Trail in St. Thomas. It is extremely popular with residents as it provides a recreational and commuter primary trail on the west side of the City. Though not common, there are several other successful examples of"Rails with Trails" in Ontario and across the country. Depending on surrounding topography, railway volume and speed rail corridors can be configured to safely accommodate a multi-use trail beside the rail line, with appropriate setbacks and separation techniques. The potential to develop "Rails with Trails" in Elgin County should continue to be explored in the future as opportunities arise and more "Rail with Trail" precedents are implemented. GREAT . D . TRAIL, GUELPH JUNCTION RAILWAY (WSP, 2014) (RIGHT) O. iL Continue to explore potential opportunities for trails with R9 r - r w f • • • • basis. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 35 NETWORKCHAPTER 3.0 1 TRAILS 41 3.6.5 SECURING ACCESS FOR TRAILS By 2036, the projected population growth in the St. Thomas area requires between 3,600 and 4,500 new dwellings with 71% -76% of them to be detached houses. With the increase in population and consequential rise in demand for trail use, there will also be potential challenges in acquiring the most ideal lands for optimum trail routes. Such housing construction will consume countryside and unless trail routes are stabled beforehand, opportunities could be lost. Land securement is the acquisition of land, land use rights, or an interest in land with the purpose of ensuring long term environmental protection and stewardship. Land securement takes the form of ownership, a lease or other type of conservation agreement and is delivered through a wide variety of mechanisms such as donation, purchase, transfer and any combination thereof. Differing from land procurement, land securement is to be undertaken with the ultimate purpose of the establishment of trails in perpetuity. A detailed description of the tools and techniques available can be found in Appendix I D. L The County and Local Municipalities should explore a - . R109 F securement strategy for trail t: lic pri- � ,• i t: r Y � L0 z - - IM #. TRAIL BRIDGE OVER LILLY POND, WATERWORKSPARK, • ♦ ON 36 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 Ir L CHAPTEP TPAILS ■ , it 3.7 DESGINING TRAILS A well-designed and properly maintained trail system is a critical part of the users' experience and enjoyment. For some users, the way a facility has been designed and maintained will significantly influence their decision to return and use the trail again. Trails that have been sustainably designed and constructed also perform better over their lifespan, result in minimal impacts to the surrounding environment, are easier to maintain and may result in fewer concerns or issues of liability. The better the quality of the design and construction, the more attractive it will be to users, the more it will be used, and the longer it will be before upgrades are required. The guidelines prepared for the Elgin County Trails Study should be used as a reference for the development and construction of the trail. The purpose of these guidelines is to assist County and local municipal staff in making informed decisions about off-road trail design. Although they are meant to provide guidance for the range of conditions typically encountered in a municipal-wide network, they are not intended to address every condition encountered. In some cases, an interim solution may be appropriate where the desired long-term solution cannot be achieved in the short or mid-term, provided that the interim solution meets users' needs and safety considerations. A "one size fits all" design approach does not apply to trail design, and it is important to try and match the trail type and design with the type of experience that is desired. A recognizable and consistent high-quality design will create a community asset where user experience, enjoyment and safety are maximized. The County and Local Municipalities . . use trail the . - . - - the Elgin County Trail Study as the R116 IF .. design. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 37 W CHAPTER ■ • NETWORK OF 3.7.1 TRAIL TYPES To respond to the variety of locations, anticipated user mix and volume, and level of maintenance a hierarchy of trail types is proposed. It consists of Primary, Secondary and Tertiary trails. Each of the trail types is described and illustrated below. PRIMARYTRAIL 3.0m PRIMARY TRAILS(MAY BE REDUCED TO 2.4m OVER SHORT DISTANCES IN CONSTRAINED LOCATIONS). *FINISHED ASPHALT SURFACE 'kFINISHED ASPHALT SURFACE ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE {7Smm HL3 THICK WHEN COMPACTED} OTHER HARD PAVEMENT SURFACE COMPATABLE WIT'HSURROUNDING URBAN DESIGN. INCLUDE SWALE PARALLEL TO TRAIL WHERE NECESSARY 2'}6 SLOPE {AS DICTATED BY SURROUNDING (CROWN OR GRADES) 4UOmm _ CROSS SLOPE DEPENDING ON SURROUNDING eiRADES l 2166 MIN. ' a 245 AKIN, TOPSOIL(150mm MIN.)WITH TURF — --- -OR OTHER TREATMENT TO 9E I COMPACT EDGES 30 COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING DEGREE ANGLE URBAN LANDSCAPE GRANULAR BASE TO EXTEND 400MM TOP O TRAIL SURFACE TO BE A FIL ABOVE EITHER SIDE OF FINISHED PAVED COMP CTED T 98% SURROUNDING GRADE UNLESS A FLUSH COMPACTED TO 6896 STANDARD JdINT IS FOR TRANSITION TO ANOTHER SURFACE ITYPtCALy PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM HARD SURFACE(E.G.URBAN PLAZA) 200mm GRANULAR B COMPACTED MOISTURE SUBSTITUTE 19mm TO 90%STANDARD PROCTOR CRUSHED CLEAR STONE WHERE SUBGRADE COMPACTED to 96%S.P.D.; DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONDrfIONS REQUIRE SLOPE SUBGRADE PARALLEL TO TRAIL ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE OR AS SURFACE RECOMMENDED BY ALTERNATE BASE: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS. 2%MM COMPACTED GRANULAR B INSTEAD OF 200MM GRANULAR B WITH t00MM GRANULAR A ABOVE Figure 11 Primary Multi-use Trail CHARACTERISTICS: ► Main trail inks, provides access to key destinations, main routes or loops in a park, and may include destination trail loops ► 3.Om preferred; 2.4m minimum No. Typically hard surface (asphalt, concrete, or other accessible surface) No. Easy trail rating, suitable for a broad spectrum of users ► Highest density of trail amenities ► Anticipated high level of use and maintenance ► Designed to meet or exceed minimum accessibility requirements No. Lighting may be considered ► 5% maximum longitudinal slope 38 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 $D4 (b ■ ■ TRAILS ■3.0 • R2Am MINIMUMS FINISHED GRANULAR TRAIL SURFACE NO SHOULDER NECESSARY 100mm STONEDUST SCREEMNGS,OR TOP OF TRAIL TO BE 256W" APPROVED EQUAL COMPACTED TO99%SPAX ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 200mm GRANULAR M'COMPACTEO TO 96%S.P.O. 2%SLOPE(CROW OR INCLUDE SWAM E PARALLEL CRM SLOPE TO TRAIL WHERE NECESSARY RGSS DEPENDING ON IAS DICTATED BY SURROUNDING SURROUNDING GRAOESI GRADES 2%MIN, 27L hUN. a =111= i1= I I=11 tt=1 I I-I I- t=tit..=t i� .-.I 1 17 TOPSOIL ANO SEEDISOO SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 98 k S.P.D.' PLAN IED BED SLOPE SLIBGRADE PARALLEL TO TRAIL OTHERTREATMENT(DEPENOM SURFACE ON LOCATION) 150MM DEPTH STONEDUST LIGHTLY COMPACTED WITH 7 TONNE ROLLER.SCREENINGS TO CONTAIN -• 7;~ ' • / APRROR.7%MOISTURE FOR COMPACTION, A A - NOTE ADDITIONAL GRANULAR M OR B MAY BE REQUIRED IN SOME LOCATIONS JO BE DETERMINED ON ASITE BY SITE BASIS{ 3.0M VERTICAL CLEARANCE TOP OF TRAIL TO BE 2$�a0mrn CAREFULLY AND LIGHTLY SCRAPE WOORLANO ABOVE SURROUNDING- FLOOR TO STABLE SOIL AS REQUIRED.(E.G. GRADE QO 7rr100mm TO REMOVE HUMUS LAYER,CAST MATERIAL TO S1DE OF TRAIL,TO BE USED FOR a0tl 0 mn, BLENDING WITH SURROUNDING GRADEI ti '� {AtlH,1 �Oumm SHRt1B f 0L] 00 8 TREE C SHRUB �'�� ATREE WIPT1{ CLEARM WILnH 150mm + 2Arn WIDE TRAILSURFACE, 214 CENTRE CROWN Figure 2 1 Secondary Trail &Secondary Trail in a Wood lot CHARACTERISTICS: ► Generally granular surfaced (compacted stone dust) ► Moderate trail rating ► Moderate density of trail amenities ► Moderate level of use and level of maintenance are anticipated ► Provides additional connections to neighbourhoods, parks, community facilities, natural areas, schools, etc. from Primary Trails No. Designed to meet minimum accessibility requirements,where feasible No. Longitudinal slope may exceed 5% depending on location/context. Maximum slope 12% over short distances .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY t REPORT t NOVEMBER 2018 1 39 CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • TERTIARYTRAIL 3.OM m VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0,3M U.3M (MIN.) CLEANING WIDTH To BE (MlN.) SHRUB 8 TREE O.6M WIDER THAN TRAIL SHRUB TREE CLEARING BED CLEARING r J WIDTH 1,5-2.Om VVIDTH °?o r R TREAD WIDTH CROWN IN CENTRE _ f ti TRAIL SURFACE 150MM WOOD CHIP MULCH OR 100MM LIGHTLY COMPACTED GRANULAR k LIGHTLY COMPACTED SURFACE PREPARATION NOTE:WOODCHIP SURFACED SCARIFY A(MINIMUM 50mm DEPTH OR TRAILS SHOULD NOT BE USED TO IN SUNNY LOCATIONS DUE TO STABLE SOILS BELOW EXCESSIVE WEED GROWTH ALIGN TRAIL IN AREA OF LEAST DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING VEGETATION. Figure 3 1 Tertiary Trail CHARACTERISTICS: ► Backcountry/wilderness" style trails; with a more challenging trail rating ► Connects to secondary trails, may be destination trails in sensitive natural areas ► 1.5-2.Om preferred; 0.75m minimum ► Generally natural or woodchip surface with compacted granular in select locations ► Suitable for a narrower range of users ► Trail structures may be necessary ► Moderate- low density of amenities and maintenance 40 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 ■ 3.7.2 TRAIL SLOPE Slope refers to both the measured fall over a given distance along the centerline (referred to as longitudinal slope) and perpendicular to the centerline (referred to as cross slope). Cross slope can be configured so that all runoff is directed to one side of the trail, or so that there is centre crown and runoff is shed to either side of the trail. Table 3 provides guidance regarding longitudinal and cross slope. Table 3 1 Longitudinal and Cross Slope LONGITUDINAL GRADEOR SLOPE 1% - 5% ► Preferred ....... ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ .. ► Introduce level rest areas every 100 to 150m of horizontal distance ► Consider design strategies such as switchbacks when slopes 5% - 10% approach 10% ► Install signing to alert users of upcoming steep grades ► Where steeper slopes are necessary "trail hardening" should be considered ► Consider the use of structures such as steps, step and ramp 10% - 15% combinations, or stairways ► Consider locating the trail elsewhere ............. ► 12-15% represents the maximum possible longitudinal slope for a sustainable trail surface. Where slopes approach or Greater than exceed 15% significant washouts become an ongoing issue. 15% No. Structures such as switchbacks, steps, step and ramp combinations and stairways should be employed. Otherwise, an alternative location for the pathway should be sought. CROSSIF • ' 2% ► Minimal, acceptable on hard surfaced trails, may not provide adequate drainage on granular surfaced trails 2% - 4% f ► Preferred range for both hard and granular surfaced trails ... I ...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... ► Avoid if possible because excessive cross slopes can be Greater than difficult and potentially dangerous for some levels of 5% physical ability and certain user groups as they can result in difficulty maintaining balance, especially among user groups with a high centre of gravity ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 41 ! CHAPTER OR r 3.7.3 ROAD CROSSINGS The crossing treatment selected generally depends on the type of road being crossed (e.g., low volume local street vs. urban arterial); number of lanes being crossed (e.g., 2-lane vs. multi-lane); traffic volume and vehicle operating speeds; sight lines (e.g., horizontal and vertical road alignment); and the anticipated volume of trail users. More significant improvements are recommended for crossings of with multiple lanes, higher traffic volumes and higher operating speeds. The following text outlines a range of at grade crossing types that correspond with roadway classification and character, and includes typical considerations for their application. They are arranged in order from crossings of low volume rural roads to high volume multi-lane urban roads. The following are four examples of road crossing approaches for consideration by the County as they implement the trails network. 42 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 3.0 TRAILS NETWORK • • lc LU H • O GC v z u a in oc W W a J Q � Z Z Q E H U , WLLI + a G i w IL �d � . o = �� m a CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • The following are some considerations for the design of trail crossings: ► Provide an open sight triangle at the crossing point to allow trail users to see approaching vehicles and for vehicles to see approaching trail users. ► Provide gates or barriers at off-road trail access points outside of the road right-of-way to prevent unauthorized users (e.g. vehicles) from entering the trail and to act as a visual cue to trail users that they are approaching an intersection with a road. ► Place caution signs along the roadway in advance of the crossing point in both directions to warn approaching vehicles of the upcoming crossing and along the trail to advise the trail users of the upcoming crossing. ► Align crossing points on both sides of a roadway or natural feature to achieve a perpendicular crossing and a shorter crossing distance. ► Where barrier curbs are present, provide curb ramps on both sides of the crossing for accessibility. ► In urban locations provide a concrete apron immediately behind the curb and include detectable warning plates. ► Consider the application of Crossrides in urban locations. Details for Crossrides can be found in Ontario Traffic Manual Book 18- Cycling Facilities. ► Provide pavement markings at controlled crossings such as stop signs and traffic signals. Pavement markings should not be used at crossings that are not controlled -this may give trail users the false impression that they have the right of way, and they may begin to cross without waiting for a gap in traffic. ► "Stop ahead" signs along the trail in advance of the crossing point and stop signs at the crossing point. Figure4 illustrates the key design principles for road crossings in urban areas, and Figure 5 applies to rural areas. 44 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTEP 3.0 1 TPAILS NETWOPKt r NOTE REFER TO ONTARIO TACTILE WARNING STRIP TRAFFIC MANUAL BOOK 18 FLUSH CUR8 AT CROSSING PATHWAY CROSSING AHEAD SIGNAGE CYCLING FACILITIES FOR PER ADDA STANDARDS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC(W¢75 QTMI ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TRAIL STOP AND DISMOUNT TO CROSS(Rs-1 8 Rb-TO OTM) SIDEWALK DI TANCEV PES PEDE15TRLAN CROSSING SIG HEAD 12.Om1 I I TRAIL CROSSING AHEAD SIGNAGE FOR VEHICULAR NOTE PAINT MARKINGS PAINTED CROSSWALK TRAFFIC.OFFSET FROM TRAIL ENTRANCE TO BE STOP BAR ON ROAD TO BE USED MARKINGS AS PER OTM ONLY AT CONTROLLED BOOK 1S DETERMINED WITH CONSIDERATION FOR CROSSINGS ILE STOP OR CROSSRIDE OPERATIN L G SPEED OF RQAD.SIGHTINES, OR SIGNAL CONTROL MARKINGS AS PER OTM HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF ROAD, BOOK 18 TRAFFIC VgLUMES ETC CENTRE MEDULN - v-,�(MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENTI TACTILE WARNING STOP BAR 1R.Um IMIN IMUM) '- STRIPS iAYPLY PER ONTARIO IN LOCATIONS TRAFFIC MANUAL WITH CENTRE BOOK 18 MEDIAN) PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL HEAD 61STANC VARIES SDEWALK TRAIL CROSSING AHEAD TACTILE SIGNAGE FOR VEHICULAR WARNING STRIP SYgp AND 615MOUNT 70 TRAFFIC ONo-15 OTM4 CROSS[Ale-1 E R♦t70 OTM) TRAIL FLUSH CURB AT CROSSING PER AODASTANDARDS SIGNAGE Ra-1(OTM) W70 IQTMI Wo-18(OTM) STOP SIGN DISMOUNT ANO W/LLK 3j7VQ/ PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE CROSSING AHEAD STOP AND DISMOUNT AND WALK DO NOT APPLY IN LOCATIONS WHERE CROSSRIOES ARE SELECTED FOR IN8TALLATION TRAIL NOTE:REFER TO ONTARIO TACTILE WARNING STRIP TRAFFIC MANUAL.BOOK TO STOP AND DISMOUNT TO CYCLING FACILITIES FOR CROSS IRR-1&Pb-70OTM} FLUSH CURS AT CROSSING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PER AODA STANDARDS SIDEWALK STANCE ARIES PATHWAY CROSSING AHEAD SIGNAGE FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CT7 �� (WC-15 OTM I NOTE NOT RAIL CROSSING MARKINGS (PAINT)ON ROADS WHERE THE ��CROSSING IS NOT CONTROLLED U.E.NO .STOP SIGN OR TRAFFIC SIGNAL PATHWAY CROSSING AHEAD SIGNAGE FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. OFFSET FROM TRAIL ENTRANCE TO BE DETERMINED WITH { { )i CONSIDERATION FOR OPERATING SPEED OF ! r ROAD.SIGHTLINES.HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL AUGNMENT OF ROAD.TRAFFIC VOLUMES ETC SIDEWALK PATHWAY CROSSING AHEAD TACTILE SIGNAGE FOR VEHICULAR WARNING STRIP STOP AND DISMOUNT TO TRAFFIC(Wrr15 OTM) PATHWAY CROSS(Ra•1&Rh•70 OTMI FLUSH CURB AT CROSSING SIGNAGE PER AODA STANDARDS Ra•1(OTMI Rb70(OrM) �\ W0 x 600 MJ STOP SIGN DISMOUNT AND WALK < // PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CROSSING AHEAD Figure 4 1 Controlled Crossing (upper), Uncontrolled Crossing (lower) ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 45 CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • .w�w�.r •n•ctirowi I 4 sir a f11.'ALUW*PRUH n.�wS:+oE+.a Ycw+taluuc f m wtwr[ty.prrnoY lRNR L+,n..L�fa.[or*ud.tso wLorx � I i Snr.c.rL.c.oL pin.,lrrn .i p cpa,or -i6.4 no"cRN.r.nnrra Y . ^"r+o 1LYlL..o"vanr hn0 frW E1r1W'aAYLWE I �S qq, wrrn E7larlYn lvo * non Ro rwr>Ff sror aiow aLE[Cri01Mr nYLi rrw4l! %T*0A V0 Ers+Rcrww a roEt�� . �� LY10[rKd W , 7"yYpE er rerr rcE�r E,ou Ra,a N1 I sqM�u+amo. {{Y va�vw,an rLwY rr�x rrncja, � �� rrcrrtu ltry l Ro.e,ti�r GALS[EUM RKEO bt Ew1ry,Y46Irf � Gubl Nf pyL p Y Wf.h:WMt`I.�1L1a6 I r�yn p[R J Gant yfpe�� J YNrrr ELlsrrw I I orcw wftRwr I t !II wKr,�.m.ck�� Rctx.reffrwn Entf. ���' J � � � a�rfwt o.es9DX Lau ras uw c+ yn WyE I to rsnrp nctr. LrOR lICSW LVS rR4L WFr lR PRf GfgMK h.K[Ni,tp T>d, MRr,�•- M]MS:F N• { ! t1µ [, AtkdF " wmA Knurl wo- t-mAf57wo! I 1 N.ntwttq PRU e*a 4 w ■ 1p,"of axal t}W M7t li I 8 it■fyr Remecr,peause O NPhER bEnYiF1t I J V0L"i:fR0A W e"Yera QN I I f r-MM +.tfgECk�+a.Rt �— �YLMI./911 I ••T{'JL S�YrarROri r1VYNn I FOCCL 1 fR1yAi[ Q rRdlFS'. ►O�.YA,[ �MfYr"P'N LYf Npttl r� Figure 5 1 Rural Trail Crossing 3.7.4 STAGING AREAS Staging areas are generally proposed for important community destinations such as community centres. Because of their high visibility and proximity to other recreation facilities, they help to raise the profile of the trail network, and some of the necessary facilities and amenities may already be present or located nearby. In some locations it may be possible to share parking and washrooms with other community facilities or other partners (e.g. School Boards for parking, Conservation Authorities for parking and washroom facilities). A well-designed trail staging area typically incorporates the following elements: No. Parking for an appropriate number of vehicles (including accessible spaces) based on actual or anticipated level of use, with potential area for future expansion. Parking for 8-10 vehicles is often appropriate for small trailheads in in rural areas, with 20-30 being more reasonable for very popular trails. of the nearby pathway. A minimum of 15 spaces should be considered for urban areas No. Orientation and wayfinding signage (e.g. trailhead sign and directional signs) 46 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 NETWOPK 4A ► Trail access barriers; No. A drop off area to unload maintenance equipment, and possibly buses at popular locations (e.g. school bus); ► Bicycle parking ► Waste receptacles (located so they are easily accessible by maintenance crews); ► Seating and or picnic/informal activity space. ► Lighting (optional) No. Washrooms (optional) - depending on location, context and local municipal practices. Note that portable washrooms should be considered for trailheads/staging areas in rural locations during peak trail use season. RE 14 TREEB AND LANOSCAPING TO BE ADO`-A[E.0.TUERHOpCB THE F !' PRESENCE OF THE STAGNG AREA _ AND 5 THE E t$CAPE.CREATE PgVAC► FOR ADJACENT RESIDENTS ETC.I tPAX COWFECTIDN TO TA", PARlA11G LOT. LYHERE 1.NUMBER OF SPACE$AND COhFIGIPU%T10N VALL EHEAE C.$IDEWIILN I VARY DEFT NDING ON LOC N(1ATM A I APPLJCA91fI ! •' REOUIREVENT5.A TYPICAL MINOR sTAOING AREA VALL REOLARE 5 7O M SPACES,AND A MAJOR ,. LAY, STAGING AREA MAY RECKMS AS MANY AS 7'rJ0 SPACES Z CONFIGURA I ION WAY INCLUDE:ENTRANCES AND+OR A DROP OF F.'TURNAAO'.]N.AREA. I I TRASH RECEPTACLE; + - TO BE INSTALLED IN A LOCATION THAT Is I5 EASILY ACCESSIBLE 6Y SERVICE 4 VE 141CLE S F OR REGULAR F ' R MAINTENANCE. FENCE.PLANTINGS OR 1 ' OTHER LNTIN L I BARFBER TO PREVENT !' I 1 O 8E7IC, VEAGLESFROM TRALWAST1R]OMTACIITY; USING TRAIL p O BE ASSESSED OR A LOCATION 1 1 BY LOCATION BASIS,CL'NSIDER TRAILNEAO SIGN; PORIABLE IVASHR-XMS DURING L SURFACE TOME FIgM AND ' PEA%SEASON.FOR POPULAR STABLE AROUND T KE ' DESTINATION IfUNL 51N TIIE SIGN TO ALLOW u5ER97p 1 RURAL AREA, APPROACk THE SIGN. 7.SIGN TO BE PLACE.N A 1 LOCATION 17u1T 141 F1O11Y } VISOBLE FROM DfF.FV R�NO LOT TO ATTRACT USER$, . BXE RAGAS Figure 6 1 Typical Staging Area ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 47 ! CHAPTER OR r 3.7.5 ACCESSIBILITY The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, (AODA, 2005) includes the goal to make Ontario accessible for people with disabilities by 2025. Ontario Regulation 413/12 (O.Reg 413/12) made under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 includes guidelines and standards that apply to new construction and extensive renovation of exterior pedestrian facilities, including Recreational trails. Key technical requirements for Recreational Trails include: No. A minimum 1.0m wide trail tread free from obstructions. ► A minimum of 2.1m clear head room above trail. ► Trail surfaces that are firm and stable. No. Openings in the trail surface must not allow passage of an object with a diameter of greater than 20mm, and elongated openings must be oriented perpendicular to the direction of travel. ► Where trails are constructed adjacent to water or a drop-off the trail must have edge protection that prevents users from slipping over the edge. The top of the edge protection must be at least 50mm above the trail surface and it must be designed to not impede the drainage of the trail surface. Edge protection adjacent to water or a drop-off is not required where there is a protective barrier/railing that runs along the edge of the trail. No. Any gates/barriers at trail entrances must have an opening of between 850 mm and 1000mm. ► Trailhead signage must indicate the length of the trail; type of surface; average and minimum trail width; average maximum running/longitudinal and cross slope; and the location of amenities (where provided). Signage must have text that has a high tonal contrast with background colours to facilitate visual recognition, and text must use a sans serif font. No. Brochures and media used to describe the trail must convey the same information in the same manner as required for trailhead signs. ► Signs and brochures must contain information about the trail (e.g. maximum slope, minimum width etc.) rather than subjective information (e.g. level of difficulty rating),which allows the user to make an informed personal decision if to use the trail before they set out. 48 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 O.Reg. 413/12 also recognizes exceptions where accessibility requirements can be waived. The exceptions generally relate to locations where: ► The impact of trail construction would adversely affect protected natural or cultural heritage resources, and these effects cannot be reasonably mitigated. ► It is not practicable to comply with the requirements, or some of them, because existing physical or site constraints prohibit modification or addition of elements, spaces or features that would be required to meet accessibility requirements. DUTY • CONSL7.6. The legislation also requires the County/ local municipalities to consult with the accessibility community as part of the design /development process for the construction of new trails and significant redevelopment of existing trails. The local accessibility community/Accessibility Advisory committees provide vision and direction to staff and Council regarding accessibility, and engaging the committee early in the design process is an effective method of sharing information and receiving feedback to inform the design. Consultations typically would focus on elements of the design feasibility to meet accessibility requirements in the design of a new trail or trail improvement, and where requirements can be practicably met, consulting on design criteria such as ► Trail slope, the need for and location of ramps on the trail. ► The location and design of rest areas, passing areas, viewing areas, amenities along the trail and other pertinent trail features. ► Information related to accessibility that will be included on signage. EW !HotL if ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 49 ! CHAPTER Ow r 3.7.6 ACCESS BARRIERS AND GATES Access barriers are intended to allow free flowing passage by permitted user groups, and prohibit access by others. Barriers typically require some mechanism to allow access by service and emergency vehicles. Depending on site conditions, it may also be necessary to provide additional treatments between the ends of the access barrier and limit of the multi-use pathway right of way to prevent bypassing of the barrier altogether. Each access point should be evaluated to determine if additional treatments are necessary. Additional treatments can consist of plantings, boulders, fencing or extension of the barrier treatment. .nnlr,v r.rrr..em o-�sn r„uwv,a.n!ro!!vun..Rr+ .S.^irM. Ki Y1.A]1.1oo.m wlw.6MCMlw np. •lµ.Mbtill f0lt b\YVEl1'r w.r.evrwr*:w.w�ww�owua�wrt� k crnrnT, wrweo.va -1 � Rx•r...• �scr..wf 1A11L i� PLAN Y+Ew 4•c�*( MTCNING PQSf r,r,.�.w. I w"'ti � pK�,q ' eaa.+rron a..wrcln vva .axavr.. �w.e+lwhs! i rum{ <aio-rtn r,wwA. � � ,wcE OEiNC ra fl1D�n00 •.W[fR eM _ MC�/0 !!s RK.. RAfl w.uwoavRa i,ELn�'1ov .y{epl. WIIMM I,fl�R� .M�.Wi cac+.n ru,L mwct.:rvn . M= ft0m_ 04YW[IO Mt .ee[l.�weod�0 .�W V+R,iE ca.c+r.vorwa ww _ti ' ELVOMM Or GATE �Q AEClW1gM pET,ry� Nw. .how■„w vr.Y on.oav*oc a....wKgw,r.+o r,ae.r nua uscw yr nrwvc.rivi TpEyRh/K."'•'3 vnfn wT.w1¢ErtOE wC+'#h5'CfE O.IgExs W.[E?AlOi/f{ Figure 7 1 Heavy Duty Access Control Gate for Rural Locations Figure7 illustrates a robust single swing gate that is modelled after those used on many rural rail trails in Ontario. The single swing gate combines the ease of opening for service vehicle access, with the ease of passage of the bollard. Gates also provide a surface/support for mounting signage. The swing gate must provide a permanent opening to allow permitted users to flow freely through the barrier. 50 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 OP • 4e4l ' The width of the permanent opening must be carefully considered so that it will allow free passage by wheelchairs, wide jogging and double strollers and bicycle trailers and electric scooters, yet not allow passage by unauthorized vehicles. Petro-reflective tape or plates on the barrier will aid in visibility after sunset. Signage fixed to the gate provides emergency contact information, reminds users of permitted uses and can help orient users by identifying the name of the road being crossed (refer to Figure 8). In urban areas trail access barriers may be less substantial, such as single bollards or P-gates. In some locations access barriers may not be necessary. do NewTecumseth �`- Atom aeemn-TOW-4'! . h -I .. 0u are of 3711 unauthorized Motorized Vehicles Sideraad 1� NOT PERMITTED New Tecumseth r' 0000 r Figure 8 1 Information Signing on Rural Trail Access Gates in New Tecumseth,ON (WSP) ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 51 CHAPTER • 3.7.7 SIGNAGE & INFORMATION The design and implementation of trail signage plays a significant role in enhancing the safety and comfort of users.Trail sign types typically include trailhead /etiquette signs, regulatory signs, gateway signs, and directional /interpretive/informational signs. The following are some of the trail signage considerations for trail signage ► Trails require clear information about how to navigate the route, how to use the trail infrastructure, and how to observe proper trail etiquette. ► Trail design should incorporate a "family' of signs with different purposes and messages. Wayfinding signs should be designed with a unified theme for ease of navigation. ► All trail signs should be clearly visible and follow a consistent visual theme to give the user a sense of connectivity and assist with wayfinding. ► Other types of signs or sign elements to consider include warning signs to provide information (e.g. narrow paths, accessibility conflicts). ► Allowing advertisements or company sponsorships may be useful to offset costs of trail maintenance and improvement. FAMILYOFSIGNS Trailhead signs (Figure 9 and Figurel0) are typically placed at key destinations to orient users upon arrival. These orient users to the network through mapping and other trail information, including trail etiquette. The also serve the important function of communicating trail characteristics such as width, surface type, slope and rest stops as required under the AODA. Trailhead signs should be placed so they are clearly visible and provide landmarks for trail users, and where visible from nearby roadways they also serve as a form of branding for the trail. 52 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 OP • r Figure 9 1 Trailhead Sign Examples I left to right Centre Wellington Township,ON. Rondeau Provincial Park,ON.St.Catharines,ON;(source WSP) }iISTORY OF TRAIL INLAID MAP I KKY TRAX-CAME TU BE • QVLRALL 4'ONTEAI . I3I0FOC&PICTVRES Ht51pRr of GURREN[ LOCATION TITLEILOGO TRAIL ETtOUETM • ITv1E50F THE TH,ati • PERWTTEDuSES FUNDING PARTNERS TRAIL MAP OVENAL4 4ATIeWAY ILAP CURRENT IQCA TIfiN 9N PA7fA4. EMERGENCY INFORMATION rYou AreE METIEI AM61■•F1[ • FONTS tW INTEREST If IRE • PATHWAY CC*Nf-CT,ONS . PkX cr cIn TRAILHEA❑ SIGN FUNCTION- IMPORTANT NOTES FOR AODA COMPLIANCE PROVIDES ORIFN TAT ILNF TO OVERALL TRAIL SYSTEM BY WAY OF CHARACTERS THAT USE A SANS SERIF FONT MAPPING AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION • HIGH CONTRAST BETWEEN BACKGROUND AND TEXT;;OR LISTS THE PERMITTED USES OF THE TRAIL AND EMERGENCY EASY READASk-ITY A MINIMUM LIGHI REFLECTIVE VAWE OF CONTACT INFORMATION 70`4 IS RECOMMENDED TO MEET AOOA REOUIREMENTS MAY ALSO PROVIDE THE HISTORY BEHIND THE TRAIL OR REGION • S143P7 TO BE PLACED ON AN ACCXSSIBLE SURFACE • SIDE AND CAN ALSQ ACT AS AN IDENTIFIER TO PA55ING CEDE51MANS AND VEHICLES KEY TYPICAL INFORMATION . TOTAL LENGTH OF T"t(APPLIES TO LINEAR TRAILS OR TYPICAL LOCATION TRAL LOOPSy • TYPICALLY LOCATED AT STAGING AREAS • AVERAGE AND MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLPPE I IN C44SES WHERE IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A PARKING AREA THE AVERAGE AND edA)(1 MOM CROSS 5L qPF. T RAILHEAD SIGN IS USUALLY IN THE TRANSITION AREA BETWEEN • TRAIL WIDTH AND LOCATION AND WIDTH TOR ANY NARROW 'PINc;w POINT S THE PARKING LOT AND TRAI! . VRML SURFACE MAT P RLAL • LOCATION OF AMENITIES IE,PEST AREAS.YYASHRI)f)MS. TYPICAL SIGN ELEMENTS ETC.I MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE A ROOF!STRLIC TORE • TRAIL ETIQUETTE DENOTING GUIDELINES FOR TRAIL USERS • EMERGENCY CONTAC T INFORMATION IIE 91 t OR MAINTENANCE ISSUESI IMAGE RV OF DESTINATION POINTS ALONG TRAIL • OLIICIL RESPONSE CODES CAN BE SCAWD BY MOBILE PHONE DEVICES THAT WILL PROVIDE INS TART ACCESS TO A DIE SIGNATED WE SSITE WE9SITES CAN BE EAEIL V MDDIFEA Sri THAT INFORMATION IMAPPI NG.EVENT S.PROGRAMS ETC.I ARE CURRENT Figure 10 1 Trailhead Sign-Schematic Concept ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 53 CHAPTER ■ • • ■ Directional signs (Figurell) should be used throughout the trail at regular intervals of uninterrupted segments and at pathway intersections. Directional signs provide users with reassurance ' that they are following the designated trail ''•���..•' network. Interpretive or informational signs can be used in combination with directional signs or on their own to educate users of points of interest along the trail, such as natural and cultural heritage ROUTE features. CWATS ,* COUNTYIL OF A consistent trail wayfincling identifier/brand should be used throughout the County. Consider using the template established by the City of St. Thomas as the basis for the R120 wayfincling identifier,with subtle variation to reflect individual municipalities - Laurel Trail 06 kin nlirl ' t Figure 111 Trail directional sign examples-left to right St.Thomas,ON.Waterloo,ON. Peterborough ON, Montague, PEI; Peterborough (source WSP). 54 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 Ir L Interpretive signs (Figure12) provide specific educational information about points of ecological, historical and general interest, as well as current land uses along the corridor depending on the interpretive program and complexity of information to be communicated. ALM- r�r=r.Y i'Hn7•rr.r�.1iTn1 r ���T>TrZ;1T3� r + Canada 3 a`. Figure 12 1 Interpretive sign examples-clockwise from upper left Sauble Beach,ON.Guelph,ON. Collingwood,ON (source WSP). Regulatory signs (Figure13) are intended to restrict aspects of travel and use along the trail. Signage restricting or requiring specific behavior is not legally enforceable unless it is associated with a provincial law or municipal by-law, etc. Where applicable, it is recommended that authorities discreetly include the municipal by-law number on signs to reinforce their regulatory function. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 55 CHAPTER • • , TRAILS • • • Standard regulatory signs are aluminum plate blanks of varying dimensional size with a painted or reflective sheeting surface. Regulatory signs call attention to a traffic regulation concerning a time or place on a route and are installed in an optimal location most visible to trail users. Generally, these signs are rectangular shape except for stop and yield signs. For most trail applications the size can be reduced from the specified size for signs used along roads (i.e. 50% smaller). Typically, they are individually mounted on a metal post or custom wood post; grouped on a metal post or custom wood post; or grouped on a custom sign board, so long as the sign message is clearly visible. MAXIMUM < > (D 25 TRAIL HARROWS SHAREDR 75 mX7 5PATHWAY 1 6200rmm 12 c m m Foth Highway GothicC ■Recto e.f�R R6-93 C.b..r try a&e.rdrr-Mue mow. .ro:+lue.e NAM"nwL 300 mm s 450 mm B kgro �e_Rca R nrti. Figure 13 1 Regulatory sign examples 3.7.8 BRIDGES AND BOARDWALKS Where possible, the trail network should make use of existing bridges, including pedestrian bridges, vehicular bridges and abandoned railway bridges in appropriate locations. In cases where this is not possible a new structure will be needed and the type and design of a structure needs to be assessed on an individual basis. The following are some general considerations: ► In most situations the prefabricated steel truss bridge is a practical, cost effective solution; No. In locations where crossing distances are short, a wooden structure constructed on site may be suitable; No. Railings should be considered if the height of the bridge deck exceeds 60cm above the surrounding grade, and should be designed with a "rub rail" to prevent bicycle pedals and handlebars from becoming entangled in the pickets; No. When considering barrier free access to bridges, an appropriate hardened surface should be employed on the trail approaches and bridge decking should be spaced sufficiently close to allow easy passage by a person using a mobility-assisted device; 56 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 ■ ' � r CHAPTER 3.0 1 TRAILS NETWORK ► Decking running perpendicular to the path of travel is preferred over decking running parallel, as the latter is more difficult for use by wheelchairs, strollers, in-line skates and narrow tired bicycles; ► Maintenance considerations; and ► Accessibility. 3.7.9 TRAIL AMENITIES Trail amenities can help to enhance trail continuity and connectivity, but primarily have an influence on the overall experience. These enhancements help to make the route comfortable and meet a variety of accessibility needs.There are a number of trail amenities which could be incorporated into the overall design of the trail. The following are some examples of different types of trail amenities and best practice considerations for selecting trail amenities: ► Provide trail amenities in strategic locations along the trail route (e.g. break up long distances between destinations with rest areas, interpretive nodes) ► Cluster trail amenities around key destinations to enhance comfort and enjoyment at trip generators (e.g. around trailheads and staging areas) ► Consider maintenance requirements for amenities, including whether or not seasonal or year-round use is planned ► Where consultation and coordination is required with other parties or agencies prior to the installation of amenities, ensure that consultation occurs early in the process to ensure agreement over amenity location and design. Seating provides the opportunity to pause along the trail at points of interest or just to rest. Young children, older adults and those with disabilities will need to rest more frequently than others. Benches are the most common form of seating, but walls of appropriate height and width, large flat boulders, and sawn logs are some alternatives depending on the trail setting.The design of seating areas and lookouts should include a level area beside the bench with a curb or other appropriate wheel stop for mobility-assisted devices. For heavily used routes it is reasonable to provide some form of seating every 250-500m. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 57 ! NETWORKCHAPTER r 3.7.10 TRAIL LIGHTING Lighting of the trail system must be carefully considered. Very few municipalities make the decision to light their entire trail system for a variety of reasons, including: ► The cost of initial installation can be prohibitive. General budget figures range from $150 t0 $180/m; No. Staff time and material cost to properly monitor, maintain lamp fixtures and replace broken and burned out bulbs on an ongoing basis. This can be exacerbated as lights on trails may be targets for vandalism, especially in locations where undesirable activities are known to take place; ► Energy consumption and light pollution, especially in residential rear yards and adjacent to natural areas, though high efficiency LED lighting reduces power usage and light spillage can be mitigated with shielding; ► Detrimental effects on wildlife in natural areas No. The potentially false sense of personal security created by lighting in the nighttime environment Although lighting of trails is generally not recommended there may be some locations where it is appropriate including: No. Main connections to important attractions such major parks; No. Celebratory spaces and waterfront promenades that have regular activity after dusk ► Trails in urban areas that are important commuter and school routes,where lighting may be needed to provide guidance during periods of low light (e.g. fall and winter when days are shorter). IL 58 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 TPAILS NETWOPK 3.8 TRAIL MAINTENANCE The trail "conversation" does not end at the point of implementation and construction. There is significant work that will need to be done following implementation to ensure that the trail and associated facilities are monitored and maintained to a level that is considered suitable for those managing the trail and effectively communicated to those using the trail. The following sections provide some suggested maintenance practices for consideration by the County and its partners related to trails. 3.8.1 RISK MANAGEMENT & LIABILITY Liability concerns are becoming a key consideration due to the potential for lawsuits. Adhering to widely accepted design, construction and maintenance are one of a number of strategies to manage risk. Aside from proper design, signage and operation of on and off-road active transportation and recreation facilities steps should be taken to address potential hazards including accidents, theft, vandalism, and other problems. Some general strategies which could be used to reduce risk and to help minimize the liability associated with providing designated trail facilities are listed below: ► Improve the physical environment, increase public awareness of the right and obligations of users and improve access to educational programs. ► Maintenance operations should conform to accepted /best practice standards, and a maintenance program that is achievable for the municipality should be developed, documented and acted on. ► If hazards cannot be immediately removed, they should be isolated with a barrier or identified with warning signs. ► Monitor trails on a regular basis to document the physical conditions and operations of the route. All reports of hazardous conditions received should be promptly and thoroughly investigated. ► Written records of all monitoring and maintenance activities should be documented and maintained. ► Avoid using descriptions such as "safe" or "safer" when describing trails when promoting their use. Identify practices that enable users to assess their own capabilities or level of comfort and make their choices accordingly. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 59 CHAPTER ■ • • ■ ► Ensure signage, mapping and promotional materials associate the term 'Recreational' with trails and the trail network. ► Maintain proper insurance coverage as a safeguard against having to draw payments for damages from the public treasury. Through the Ontario Trails Act, there were amendments to various Acts that have a bearing on recreation trails, including the Occupiers Liability Act, Public Lands Act and Trespass to Property Act which help to protect owners of properties that contain public trails as well as adjacent land owners, and also provide stiffer penalties for those that trespass on private property (i.e. go off trail property onto private lands), vandalize or cause damage. ► The Occupiers' Liability Act has been amended to clarify that the lower standard of care (responsibility) applies to occupiers of trail property which are not-for-profit or public-sector organizations, even if there is an incidental fee related to access onto or use of the land, such as for parking; or if a public benefit or payment is given to a not-for-profit trail manager. ► The Public Lands Act has been amended to o Make damage to Crown land and property an offence o Enable a court to order a person, who has been convicted of this offence, to stop the activity and/or rehabilitate lands and repair any damage to property. o Provide the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry with new enforcement tools to stop vehicles, inspect documents, and arrest persons suspected or caught violating the act. o Increase the maximum penalties for offenders and the length of time to initiate charges ► The Trespass to Property Act has been amended to raise the maximum fine for trespassing from $2,000 to $10,000 and remove the limit on the amount of damages that could be recovered in a prosecution. Insurance coverage is often added to the liability insurance Municipalities already carry for their other public parks and open space. should be reviewed and incorporated into day-to-day R13 The risk management and liability prevention strategies F decision- making processes where applicable when planning, designing and operating trails in Elgin County. 60 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 ■ Ir L CHAPTER TRAILS ■ . �1 3.8.2 TRAIL MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES A trail maintenance log should be used to document maintenance activities. The log should be updated when features are repaired, modified, replaced, removed, or when new features are added. Accurate trail logs also become a useful resource for determining maintenance budgets for individual items and tasks, and in determining total maintenance costs for the entire trail. In addition, they are a useful source of information during the preparation of tender documents for trail contracts, and to show the location of structures and other features that require maintenance. Table 4 1 Trail Maintenance Strategies FREQUENCY TASK ► As a minimum, mark, barricade and sign the subject area to warn trail users, or close the trail completely until the problem can be corrected. ► Remove vegetation and/or windfalls, downed branches etc., where IMMEDIATE traffic flow on the trail is being impaired or the obstruction is (within resulting in a sight line issue. Remove hazard trees that have been 24 hours of identified. becoming ► Repair or replace items that have been vandalized or aware of stolen/removed. This is especially important for regulatory signs the situation that provide important information about trail hazards such as road crossings, steep grades, and sharp curves. through a ► Removal of trash in overflowing containers or material that has "hotline", been illegally dumped. email, other ► Repair of obstructed drainage systems causing flooding that poses notification or a hazard to trail users or that is resulting in deterioration that poses observation an immediate safety hazard. ► Monitor trail areas and structures that are prone to erosion after severe summer storms and repair as required. ► Repairs to structural elements on bridges such as beams, railings, access barriers and signs. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ► Trail patrols/inspections should review the trail conditions (as often as weekly in high-use areas), to assess conditions and prioritize REGULARLY maintenance tasks and monitor known problem areas. ► Mow grass along edges of trails (in open settings only). Depending (weekly/ on trail location this may be done weekly, biweekly or monthly and biweekly/ the width can vary according to the location (typically 0.5 to 1.0m). monthly) This helps to keep the clear zone open and can slow the invasion of weeds into granular trail surfaces. Not all trails will have mown edges. In woodland and wetland areas, pruning and brushing is typically the only vegetation maintenance to be undertaken. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 61 CHAPTER • • • TRAILS • • • � FREQUENCY � TASK ► Regular garbage pickup (10 day cycle or more frequent for heavily used areas). ► Repair within 30 days or less, partially obstructed drainage systems causing intermittent water backups that do not pose an immediate safety hazard, but that if left unchecked over time will adversely affect the integrity of the trail and/or any other trail infrastructure or the surrounding area. ► Patching/minor regarding of trail surfaces and removal of loose rocks from the trailbed. COST ► Culvert cleanout where required. EFFECTIVE ► Top up granular trail surfaces at approaches to bridges. ► Planting, landscape rehabilitation, pruning/beautification. ► Installation/removal of seasonal signage. ......................................................................................................:. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 ► Conduct an annual safety audit. This task can be efficiently included with general annual safety audits for parks and other recreation facilities. ► Evaluate support facilities/trailside amenities to determine repair and/or replacement needs. ► Examine trail surface to determine the need for patching and grading. ► Grading/grooming the surface of granular trails, and topping up of wood chip trails. ► Pruning/vegetation management for straight sections of trail and ANNUALLY areas where branches may be encroaching into the clear zone. This task is more of a preventative maintenance procedure. Cuttings may be chipped on site and placed appropriately or used as mulch for new plantings. Remove branches from the site unless they can be used for habitat (i.e. brush piles in a woodlot setting), or used as part of the rehabilitation of closed trails. Where invasive species are being pruned and/or removed, branches and cuttings should be disposed of in an appropriate manner. ► Inspect and secure all loose side rails, bridge supports, decking (ensure any structural repairs meet the original structural design criteria). ..................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. EVERY TO 5 No. Cleaning and refurbishment of signs, benches and other trailside YEARS amenities. EVERY10 TO IN. Resurface asphalt trails (assume approximately every 15 years). 20 YEARS ► Major renovation or replacement of large items such as bridges, kiosks, gates, parking lots, benches etc. 62 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 3.0 TRAILS NETWORK • Using the maintenance strategies outlined in Trails Study R140 and current Local Municipal trail maintenance practices as a starting point, Local municipalities should develop appropriate trail maintenance plans and budgets. Annual maintenance budgets should be refined to RI accommodate the maintenance of trail facilities. Budgets should increase over time to correspond with the increase ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY in the number/ length of trail facilities that have been implemented. • . - • 400 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES The Elgin County Trails Study has been designed as the starting point of a larger county-wide trails strategy geared at improving access, consistently designing, increasing awareness and encouraging residents and visitors to utilize trails. Once the trails study is completed there will be a significant amount of work that will need to be done to move forward with implementation. The following chapter outlines suggested approaches and tools to support these next steps and forms a proposed implementation strategy for County staff and their partners. The implementation strategy is not linked to a specific phase and /or costing for proposed itrail connections. It has been designed as a guide to help future decision making as it relates to trail investments. 64 tY. Ir L CHAPTER • IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 PRIORITIES FOR TRAIL DEVELOPMENT This section outlines some of potential priorities with respect to implementing the trail network across the County. The priorities for network implementation have been organized municipality. Potential priorities are illustrated on Maps 4.0 to 4.8. 4.1.1 COUNTY-WIDE On a County-wide level, it is recommended that the County continue to explore with Southwold, Dutton- Dunwich and West Elgin, their level of interest/support for the potential to develop a trail along the former CASO railway line, and engage in discussions with Entergus (the owner of the line) regarding a long-term agreement/ partnership arrangement with Entegrus for the same. Many of the trail priorities in these m municipalities leverage the opportunity presented through the development of the former CASO railway line, given that it intersects many of the settlement FORMER CASO RAILWAY areas in those municipalities. CORRIDOR (WSP, 2018) 4.1.2 AYLMER Recommended priorities for trail development in the Town of Aylmer include the following: ► Introducing a formal trail through Lions Park and Crystal Park; and No. Developing a trail loop through Steen Park. The County, in partnership with the Town of Aylmer, is : recommended to introduce a formal trail through Lions Park and Crystal Park. The two parks do note: E currently have any formal trails, and the introduction of : {. one would provide park users with an additional park amenity. The County and Town are also encouraged to pursue to development of a trail loop, through the western segment of Steen Park. Developing a trail loop would give park users a formalized trail around the existing baseball diamond and would serve as a ` CONCEPTUAL perimeter route around the park. . • • . ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 1 65 Elgin • unty Trails Study 12 ,1i N Map 4-0: Priorities Proposed Trail Network Elgin County Legend Trails Further investigate the develop mentof a trail — Elgin Hiking Trail along she former rwWuorrfdvr isecween Port —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) Furtherand the Town of Tilsonburg. Further investigate the develop-ment of trall along —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail the Former CASO call corridor,from the county boundarywlth:he Municipalityof Chatham Kent to City of London Municipal and Conservation Area the City of St.Thomas. vb {]{�iv�-. Trails -- Proposed Trails' lob �1plE Destination Areas -l�ilalah de 7�i Conservation Areas At L Lip Municipal Parks Tlid ) Provincial Parks er inylya Lakes and Watercourses Middlesex County ds Beach �4 H N E L N rr ; Community Centre ntral El in F CA V Conservation Area Q Provincial Park o -Dun • a �� {r ❑ l{TEP U © Seniors'Centre School F Q Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ wfE ff.. E Abandoned) 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other Vapproved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of the Elgin County Trails Study. Lake Erie Municipality of Chatham-Kent NOOF 8 10 40 km Owl-. �P�uHic Health Elgin • Study N Map 4-1: Priorities Proposed Trail Network t Town of Aylmer o Legend Cr n Q Trails Q — Elgin Hiking Trail ttl Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) a LU W to p2 —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail U 0 Refine and cdrnplete thisprr N �avelop a trail loop around the Municipal and Conservation Area Illy road ql,k of theGrea[Trail ITrans Baseball diamond through Trails Canada Tral l}biased on W 5'.een Park. Rune and complete this Orr engineering work that has heem road link of the GregtTralI(Trans -- Proposed Trails' Completed. _ carada Trail)basedlon l angneering work that has been Destination Areas WILLDW RJVE —_ 0 _ corhplesed o Conservation Areas Township of Municipal Parks maiahide V L-5 Malahide W Provincial Parks NUT+a. Lakes and Watercourses rw°u N ■ z s Beach 1 5 � w (1) Community Centre TALBOT LIN FALSOT 5T EEF WES Lu Q m Conservation Area � X nrwt z 1 Q Provincial Park © Seniors'Centre SOUTH sTREET'JVEST j School QF4K SfPEEI inaancu+cs Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ p t Abandoned) ��r Z 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other N /'1 to LU r' ��} approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of y =Y '7� the Elgin County Trails Study. } r w LL' �4 All Clry'fM1n Rq 1— nel tletefrom tM1e a ..p ano in n rnax 0 BROOK LINE PAM Yerre�Uondl Lre�in Lions Park and Crystal Park. 0 Q,ar t p• ACTIVEFiGIIV �Wirif3F��F3 ' LIgin PuWlCHoWth Elgin • Study V Oxford County IN N Map 4-2: PI'Ior ties ' Straffordville n proposed Trail Network Municipality of Bayham INE o urtherdivestigite the developmentofatrail as Legend Ian g the farm[r rail corridor,between Fourth Q� [treet and Heritage Line. 4 NSi Trails EN CC�LEG! LINE {.�4� — Elgin Hiking Trail OQ —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) Q7 —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail Qa AIN 3� HERITAGE LINE — Municipal and Conservation Area C: FONPVILLE TR ET Trails COMMUNITY BOARDWALK LINE CGIfTNF— - EL LU - Proposed Trails' Y O C��� VW +�� ' Destination Areas Conservation Areas x 4 b Municipal Parks Township Malahide ¢ m Provincial Parks O Q Formalize the trail aiongithe former rail corridor, Lakes and Watercourses abetween 0 ridge Street in Port Burned and Tunnel B Beach Cr l Line-Additionally,extend trail atong former rail ]� � � 2 5 corridor from Bridge Street in Port Burwell to Pltt (V Community Centre Street.Further investigate the opportunity to F _ develop the trail between Port Burwell and Conservation Area U _ Norfolk Courlty Tilsonburg Q Provincial Park Q / +y o © Seniors'Centre O -- - p N N� Port Burwell j School Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ Abandoned) T 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other If, ENNq��N I the Elgin County��N� approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of Trails Study. R�IVI� L �ae nR rn M a,1a,�arro - s C fY eo�ora.Tm ^2e^Tani ,—ea- 0 QU 5 i➢ 1 2 ACTIVEELGirY km � q LSglnl Elgin • • • J N Map 4-3: Priorities Belmont Tt hlppl Proposed Trail Network OZ— , Allalahldc MA _r rsSF_ Develop• Municipality of Central Elgin City of London mm�^��N �`"Avg Legend r ,eswants y)O E NOt�SYn£ETy Trails SON LINE O — Elgin Hiking Trail d l# —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) D 0 t;-qN5 Uhl ! n.eu. jj —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail a m away 4 FERGUSO LINE u z e eoi m Municipal and Conservation Area n�Y.IMaip ball wmMTreRiON Townshi of Malahide on 1h.—N"de lP i✓ valwn p 0 C1.5 1,',. Ma—Rnaera Trails km a,F r, Proposed Trails' -0O --E:OLLECE LINE Destination Areas COM�"e RON MC VEIL LINE - - S 0 N/ O Conservation Areas 7� S�s� O Port Stanley �dr°� Municipal Parks on - -LENCOLIN LINE Provincial Parks Lakes and Watercourses ET �- Towmhlpai '�-� • �..-- TAILBOT LI souMlwea y I� ■ Beach P , ,, 0 4 Community Centre F\lJGV � � d Q s t m Conservation Area Q Provincial Park N E h 8 g O tr W w. © seniors'Centre ¢4; o"",.-. Rriel B °y .,,,,„ n r school 40 4J 0 0.T5 1.5 now dewkpnent A? U E"��� JOHNWI LINE 3 km Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive / whojlstop Trail -- nmilsnnmt Z Abandoned) /y j I R T taminui to C 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other �! Township of ^Pmo"reom E U e'°�°aa"" d municipal master d trails ad as art of south of approve pa p ans an propos p raaewlTu G uwcrnwn aln !�iouthoille Line LynhUrst -0 theElginCounyTrailsStudy. DU w0 nvhhln�r adL a HEMAMAKA SPA x vrxlcrt OFLIHE wmehlp ot� c� me..zoieerwsv c„�w.c.aaumi,�e. UNION � umwad o CRY ROgp ROB R75 LINE J ~' �-��► eels e�wnR<rtvTo clw- p �KEtlt`fE DEXTER LINE b aLVofmL. \'. ~ s`1.rhmr""nn C, 71011LR — —LA lk lrail i oavelOp a vaA lluaupn n~,11i n-- _ 9—n Perk M laclnmle H Lynnu. 9317 B+ Wvy u.W msocuaw t4, — - i ' r ALBOT:TR�Fr ELt IN S4 0 2S 5 10� 0 1.25 2.5 -- Etgire, PuNic I WU - - ElginAl • • 0 Further Investigate the development of a trait glary dii N Map 4-4: Priorities th3 former CASOralIcorrid or.lrom the county Dutton Proposed Trail Network he undary with the Municipality of Chatham-Kent;o Municipality of Dutton-Du nwi c h th a City of St.Thomas, `po 9� �0 Legend Middlesex County 9Rr 491 "eoc sTgF ° yG� Trails F 9F sT � G r vF — Elgin Hiking Trail �1 T MILLER qp —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) Totrtnship t 7a. 5 —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail w Southwald �`� � rj ti � Municipal and Conservation Area Trails CP fQ 110 �r -- Proposed Trailsl au � o y ti 9 �90 Destination Areas vrroru rlwres CDKSERYATIDN � � Conservation Areas AREA Ap 0 0$ 1 Municipal Parks krn Provincial Parks Lakes and Watercourses p J� s Beach Community Centre V Conservation Area Munlcipaffty of G rG, ��'c}`� 10 Provincial Park West =1gin © Seniors'Centre � Pk School Q / Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ P � FI LIN Abandoned) 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other mun approved icipal master plans and trails proposed as part of the Elgin County Tralls Study. 1 �� . me wsPrcana ae p area d(f NIE-PIERCE PRO"INILIAL PARK Svll :eN em,eri�o�Wzm�3a �❑ Explore the opportunity to develop trails on sections of Ary 9sa,�o�"^�a"°a^ar,a me unvpe ted road allowa ices for Walnut Line andN.W. Erin/LakevIaW Ll"between Currie Road and Fingal Line. 0 Lake Erie 0 2,5 00 Aor fU LGINJFfeeRfi � F.Igln. "�wrwww�r • /�i • � Elgin County N Qp N Map 4-5: Priorities Oxford County Springfield nn Proposed Trail Network '' p A I MALAHIDE N Township of Malahide P^ V `'O m cv� 'COMMUNITVPLACE Legend ' G NELSSTR E1 _ Trails _ PRESSE LINE MAIN STREET STREE # — Elgin Hiking Trail f(tsQ BRopDwAY —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) j �YOVI$L1N —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail TRUMAN LINE - FIN Y Municipal and Conservation Area _ ASHTON TREET Trails IN -- Proposed Trails ' MAPL=TON LIN BEST LINE Destination Areas ONMG��tLti�� ' O Conservation Areas R COICO LEGE L NE 0 0.5 1 t� Municipal Parks AKA/ER LDUFE ❑ _Ian EDGEWARE LINE O MANA6E FNTAREA Q Provincial Parks Q GL I�fGOCIN LINE 0 Funher invesligafE the d%V9cPmenkof a bail along the lormer rail ❑ O corridor,between rlysmess Slrem Bind Pressy Line.Proposed w Lakes and Watercourses north-south linkage,from Finney siaSupetlor Streal lc Broadway � O _�' w ■ Beach ❑ St./Whitlakar Street connects with IFe existing sidewalk,allowing TALBOT LINE Q braconnWionIcMalahideCommpnityPface, In Q ❑ O Community Centre rQ O a QO m Conservation Area U ct U a: w X Municipality of III Provincial Park 0- ❑ N 0 Seniors'Centre SOUTHDALE LINE 6PRINCWRT R Ll } Baytlan Q er. CONSERVATI� N Z 3 V Port Bruce n r School ARsn l Q J I N Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ Municipality of J N WISE LINE y} w Abandoned) Central Elgin = Q U RUSH CREEK LINE _ IMPERIAL ROA 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trolls from other approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of Q CA)L 1, the Elgin County Trolls Study. TON LINE a E ► Ryrts a oo<r SPARTA LINE } O p Te m. �—P d,c-1 O R. u� geiyncounb.ton. C VIEN A LINE d l4 J CMEN 8 NO A SCOTIA LINE U O av z r I r r PiIOVINr;IKPApN Vv`r z5 5 to 0 O.S 1 AcntarLGiN o km Eii Elgin . III pulridHeRlFli Elgin • • • ..ii V ' N Map 4-6: Priorities ``Shedden Proposed Trail Network Further investigate rhfy development oFa trail along the former CASs rail corridor, �'Pp Township of Southwold from th_ MunicipalityofChatharl-Kant to theCiy Legend Middlesex Countye of g 11NE - - Trails oy — Elgin Hiking Trail —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) `C/s KEYBfONECOMVIEX/ ��� I srR� soccEKwEtos —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail G Fr Municipal and Conservation Area �' �� Trails \ -- Proposed Trails' Q h Destination Areas r . = Conservation Areas l) �' ikm III Municipal Parks \ pd {f Provincial Parks � Lakes and Watercourses r =T s Beach CommunityCentre (V Conservation Area Z) Q Provincial Park L Explore the opoo rtunity to t4 develop trails en sections of Illlllltllflp:�llty © Seniors'Centre < unopened road allowances y\� for Blind Line,Mcpiarmid r School Line,Scotch Llne,and of Ge' tral Walnut Llne. ��I .__. Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ 9d }! A,l / Abandoned) UNION f LJl ON Q rZQ 1.proposed Trails include previously proposed trails fr.m other approved municipal master plansand trails proposed as partof l the Elgin county Trails Study. FINC-ALWILr IFE V MANACEM 7 _ AREA a:eN eey E•i�o�mr.a%i.aac o ireu. G INunicipalltyof 9R15 �a9nR "�a •,a,,,rromrne 1 ryorM.pw o,,. y\ �r Lake Erie aAlit 2.s s ,a I_G,N I �• km r Elgin_•. �Heaft El gin County • • • o Map 4-7: Priorities N RON MCNEIL LINE proposed Trail Network ' a� _ City of St.Thomas or Municipality of Legend "10 z -10 O Central Elgin Q Trails WATER TOWER LINES°"'a`i1O0" — Elgin Hiking Trail J JEDGEWE LINE —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) -j S W /_ —Great Lakes Waterfront Trail 190 wa,a.vcaks ,r PAW"'" l! r 2 Municipal and Conservation Area Utilize the St.Thomas Elevated Park as an L,A EC K I.I. �oUTH EDC,�VA ROAD / Trails east-west trail linkage.The Countp is . s rwomme o rurtner invest gee -L - Proposed Trails' development of a trail along the former CASO rail 1 cuwMl l • Extend t to Whmlestop-Trail one - ccrridor,with the it.Thomas Elevated Park (I� "�'� block north.to Immediately south of Destination Areas providing a Iinkaga into the City o�St_Thomas. * the CN rail corridor.Develop an �- ICI east-wes trail linkage rrcm Station O Conservation Areas i U, - Street to-Flora Street anc intersecting with theor000sed WhisdeatopTrail = Municipal Parks extension. � Provincial Parks Municipality of = Lakes and Watercourses T, LBOT S7 REET Central Elgin s Beach Community Centre ELLIVGTON E ;;eA�or t (V Conservation Area 4 w Z) Z 0 Provincial Park W E5 N © seniors'Centre ti ' Q School V) ak Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ QO m --_ EL STRE ELM LINE Abandoned) y' M 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other 1 approved municipal master plans and tralls proposed as part of 1 O the Elgin County Trails Study. LLI NP1EW0o0 T"nship of za"" w —"• w �Mz o,e gwsvunem cmuvumiw. Soulthwold .". a I 4 e eM1191 c W..ton. p "wsn aN_ u"e ra„nc_,naT U ��q.rs,� ��a���� W HDA SOUT LIN l j� z t�ycc 2 i ;0 *1<0-:�1075— UMunicipality of -- —;3 3 Central Elgin w�'IGIN l Elgi 3(,t,^^'•. km � n.. Prl6ikFieattft r Elgin County Trails Study I'Al N N Map 4-8: Priorities West borne Proposed Trail Network Furtffl her investigate the developmentofa trail along y�o Municipality of West Elgin ASD ralf torrid �o / 9 fiomtheco^intyboundsrywith Legend the Municipakty of '�i- ��s g Chat ham�K*nt to the CI ty o,St. Thomas. FF o \sr Fr Trails Middlesex County "FS �19 1 �;`TP 7R111 _ Elgin Hiking Trail P� j ���� —Trans Canada Trail(The Great Trail) f'C, �. Great Lakes Waterfront Trail �0 4� ��� _ Municipal and Conservation Area Ak 9� e� Trails wesTionNe C� Opo«u`ur. -- Proposed Trails Destination Areas 1 yl�� �` r � � 7�i Conservation Areas 9� A P {Y•5 1k Municipal Parks Provincial Parks 0 Y G\ q, 4 I Lakes and Watercourses V Establish a trail canneetian along Monroe Street,hetween B Beach 1 tie Rudney CorrmunityCentre Develop a trail linkage- and the former CASO rail betty®en Miller Park and (V Community Centre [' corridor.Introduce a formal West Elgin Secondary�. trail at the Rodney Community School. V Conservation Area Gp ti Centre. Q Provincial Park N © Seniors'Centre Rodney ��,�` n j School Al ,/`\� Rail Corridors(Active and Inactive/ S p SPA �% �'oo pNEy Abandoned) MUNITY �o e 1.Proposed Trails include previously proposed trails from other 1/. � d'TR approved municipal master plans and trails proposed as part of v F the Elgin county Trails Study. Municipality of �100 Chatham-Kent �O � ? �' r d�1191ryro%M1eaa o A aJA,ry 9 11-o "— ,1 a,,,d .�. Lake Erie ST ti F T O T AC7711VELG1rJ ��... km f �kmA1 Elgin 3 icFiidHt ...�" � . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r It is recommended that the County work with The Great Trail to confirm and formalize the trail routing through the Town. Existing conditions along segments of The Great Trail through the Town of Aylmer, as referenced from The Great Trail mapping, suggest that an opportunity exists to formalize the trail. The end result would be a trail that is clearly distinguishable and appropriately signed to clearly communicate with trail users the location and orientation of the trail. 4.1.3 BAYHAM Recommended priorities for trail development in the Municipality of Bayham include ► Formalizing the existing rail-trail between Tunnel Line and Bridge Street (Port Burwell); and No. Extending the existing rail-trail that currently terminates at Bridge Street in Port Burwell, through to Pitt Street, and ► Further investigate developing a trail along the former rail corridor, between Fourth Street and Heritage Line. In the Municipality of Bayham, the County, in partnership with the Municipality, should prioritizes formalize the existing rail-trail that extends from Tunnel Line and Bridge Street (Port Burwell).This rail corridor was previously operated by the Tillsonburg, Lake Erie, and Pacific Railway. In its current state, ::►; particularly at the existing trail head at Bridge Street, a ' formal indication of the trail is lacking and could be ` mistaken for a snowmobile or ATV route. The County and Municipality are encouraged to formalize the existing trail, from introducing signage and directional ENTRANCE TO TRAIL ON markers, to grading and maintaining a consistent trail F'110 FORMER RAILWAY (WSP) su rface. This segment of rail-trail forms the southern segment of a trail that could ultimately extend to the Town of Tillsonburg, and connect the communities of Vienna, Straffordville and Eden along the way. Investment in this trail could also prove to be a benefit for the County and Municipality in terms of its cycling tourism opportunity. The second priority, extending the existing rail-trail that currently terminates at Bridge Street in Port Burwell, and extending it to Pitt Street,would connect the existing trail infrastructure to MHCS Ojibwa and the Museum of Naval History, as well as the commercial area on Robinson Street. This extension would connect trail users to a greater 66 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER • 461 ' number of tourist and commercial attractions and provide an off-road recreational link along the river in Port Burwell. The third recommended priority for the Municipality of Bayham is to further investigate the development of a trail in Straffordville along the former rail corridor, between Fourth Street and Heritage Line. This former rail corridor is the same corridor mentioned above, as it pertains to the existing trail extending out of Port Burwell. Establishing this trail segment in Straffordville affords residents the opportunity to walk along a formalize off-road setting and addresses specific concerns from Straffordville residents about the lack of such opportunities. Developing the trail segment in question allows the County and Municipality to incrementally develop this larger trail corridor, which has the potential to extend from Port Burwell in the south to the Town of Tillsonburg in the north. 4.1.4 CENTRAL ELGIN Recommended priorities for trail development in the Municipality of Central Elgin include ► Completing a trail link from the southern terminus of the Whistlestop Trail to approximately 750m south of Southdale Line, parallel to the London & Port Stanley (L&PS) rail corridor; No. Developing a new trail connection in Belmont, linking neighbourhoods on the north and south sides of the creek; ► Developing an in-boulevard trail on the south side of Caesar Road in Belmont, form Sherwood Ave. to Belmont Lions Park; No. Developing a trail through Cowan Park in Lynhurst. The completion of a link from the southern terminus of the Whistlestop Trail to approximately 750m south of Southdale line is recommended to be implemented as + ' part of the new neighbourhood development. This link would provide an off-road north-south linkage for residents living in the new neighbourhood, providing 1' _- access to St. Thomas and all of the trails that connect with the Whistlestop Trail.The recommended priority f trails for Belmont would provide north-south '_`F connectivity in the community, formalizing a trail linkage that has been used informally for a number of INFORMAL yea rs. ■ The in-boulevard trail on the south side of Caesar Road in Belmont improves walkability in the community and connects future proposed trail linkages. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 67 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r In Port Stanley, it is recommended that the Municipality develops a waterfront trail from the east pier to Little Beach. The trail has the potential to contribute to the revitalization efforts around the harbour and adds to the experience of residents and visitors. Lastly, it is recommended that the Municipality prioritize the development of a trail through Cowan Park. As a major recreational facility within the Municipality, the development of a trail through the park would add to the value it provides residents and visitors. Refer to Central Elgin Trail Master Plan (2016) for additional details. 4.1.5 DUTTON-DUNWICH Recommended priorities for trail development in the Municipality of Dutton-Dunwich include ► Further investigate opportunities to develop a trail loop utilizing a segment of the former Canada Southern Railway (CASO) corridor, Marsh Line, and Leitch Street; and ► Explore opportunities to utilize unopened road allowances for the purposes of trail development. The development of a trail loop provides Dutton residents with another trail option, in addition to the trail located in Sons of Scotland Park. This proposed priority project would leverage the County-wide initiative of pursuing opportunities to f develop the former CASO Railway corridor into an off- - road trail, spanning from the County boundary with the Municipality of Chatham-Kent to St. Thomas and traversing through Dutton. Secondary, the County and Municipality are . • encouraged to explore opportunities to explore unopened road allowances for the purposes of developing trails through them. The following unopened road allowances should be explored in further detail: ► Walnut Line ► Scotch Line ( ► Docker/Currie Rd 68 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 4.01 IMPLEMENTATION 4.1.6 MALAHIDE Recommended priorities for trail development in the Township of Malahide include ► Development of a trail in Springfield, utilizing the former east- west railway corridor; and ► Developing a north-south trail linkage in Springfield, from Finney St./Superior St. to Whittaker St./Broadway St. The Township of Malahide, is recommended to prioritize the development of a trail in Springfield, utilizing the former railway corridor. In developing this trail, residents of Springfield would have an option when it comes to walking in an off-road setting, with the trail providing an alternative to using the trail at the Malahide Community Place, The second priority mentioned above is the development of a trail connection in Springfield that links Finney St./Superior Street to Whittaker FORMER PAIL LINE St./Broadway St. This proposed connection currently has a desire line, suggesting that pedestrians are already THROUGH SPRINGFIELD using this crossing location as a north-south linkage. Establishing a formal trail in this location also allows for connectivity with the Malahide Community Place and the Springfield Library, both of which are located further north along Whittaker Road. 4.1.7 WEST ELGIN Recommended priorities for trail development in the Municipality of West Elgin include ► Establishing a trail connection in West Lorne, between Miller Park and West Elgin Secondary School; ► Developing a loop trail in West Lorne utilizing a segment of the former Southern Canada Railway Corridor, Munroe Street, and Graham Street; ► Establishing a trail connection in Rodney, between the Rodney Community Centre and the former CASO Railway corridor, primarily using Monroe Street; and ► Formalize a recreational path at the Rodney Community Centre where the existing track is located. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 69 . CHAPTER 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r In West Lorne, it is recommended that the County, in partnership with the Municipality, establish a trail connection between Miller Park and Elgin Secondary School. This link would provide an alternative north- south corridor for students that live north of the school. The recommended trail loop in West Lorne would provide residents with an additional trail route for leisure pu rposes. In Rodney, the County and Municipality are recommended to formalize a connection between the TRAIL OPPORTUNITY TO former CASO railway corridor and the Rodney ELGIN ELEMENTARY Community Centre, traveling along Monroe Street. Should the former CASO railway corridor be developed into a public trail, this recommended trail linkage would connect one recreational facility with another. Additionally, the formalizing of the recreational path at the Rodney Community Centre would allow for a trail facility that could be used by users of all ages and abilities. 4.1.8 SOUTHWOLD Recommended priorities for trail development in the Township of Southwold include: _ 7Hi5 PROPERTY i5 724 ACRES No- - ES FAR Establishing a trail connection along Fingal Line, 30 HO 400 ACRES PLUS TRAM LAND between Iona Road and Union Road, and along ILS Union Road between Fingal Line and Boxall ; y Road. P The proposed trail priority for the Township of Southwold provides for greater connectivity to the Fingal Wildlife Management Area and the Fingal community. It also serves to provide an alternative trail option north of the Fingal Wildlife Management Area, where The Great Trail and The Lake Erie Waterfront Trail deviate to the south, along Lake Line. The proposed trail connection is intended to connect to the intersection of Fingal Line and Iona Road, which is a short distance away from the Southwold Earthworks Historic Site, as well as the location where The Great Trail and the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail split. 70 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 4.01 • 4.1.9 ST. THOMAS Recommended priorities for trail development in the Township of Southwold include: ► Extending the Whistlestop Trail from Scott Street to immediately south of the railway corridor; ► Establishing an east-west connection parallel to the railway corridor at the proposed terminus of the Whistlestop Trail, from Station Street to Flora Street; and ► Establishing a trail along the St. Thomas Elevated Park, from King Street in the east to the municipal boundary in the west. The first of the recommended priorities for trail implementation in St. Thomas is to extend the Whistlestop Trail from Scoot Street to immediately south of the railway corridor. This proposed priority extends a popular north-south trail corridor one block north, and the proposed east-west trail linkage from Station Street to Flora Street further connects the surrounding neighbourhood to the Whistlestop Trail. The area, as it exists today, has a number of desire lines, indicating that there is a demand for this proposed connection. Once at Flora Street, individuals will be L&PS RAI LWAY TRAIL able to formally cross the railway tracks at a road- OPPORTUNITY (WS ■ crossing. The second priority is to establish a trail along the St. Thomas Elevated Park, from King Street in the east to the municipal boundary in the west. Once developed, this proposed trail linkage would enable further connections from the east and west sides of the bridge. R16priority projects and initiatives identified in the Elgin Th e County and Local Municipalities should consider the F County Trails Study when deciding on the implementation FF of trails under their • • ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 71 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r 4.1.10 UPDATING THE NETWORK The Trail Study is not intended to be a static document. Though the strategy has been developed as a blueprint/guide for future planning and development, it must be recognized that priorities change over time and additional or alternate opportunities may arise. The network plan is intended to be flexible. The timing and details related to the network's implementation should evolve through ongoing community consultation, discussions with private landowners, County and local municipal Council's decisions on priorities and detailed design studies. As network changes or additions arise the overall intent and direction of the plan should be respected. To help facilitate this, the following should be considered when additional opportunities or changes arise: ► The validity of each route should be confirmed when it is being considered for implementation. Where it is determined that a particular route is no longer valid, or is impossible to achieve, a parallel route performing the same network function should be selected. ► Where applicable potential trail routes are considered as part of the Environmental Assessment process for municipal infrastructure projects. ► Input should be gathered from County and municipalities and partners e.g. conservation authorities, and interest groups through a coordinated communication process to ensure that trail users' needs are being considered and balanced. ► Performance of the facilities should be regularly monitored so that improvement in trail routing, design and maintenance can evolve as new information and new opportunities arise. ► The Elgin County Trail Strategy should be updated on a regular basis, at least every five years. The Elgin County Trails Strategy should be updated in five R170years to include trails that have been completed and to F optimize new trail development opportunities that have been identified in the intervening time. 72 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 Ir L CHAPTER , IMPLEMENTATION 4.2 NETWORK MANAGEMENT The trail network illustrated in the Trails Study was developed using the GIS database provided by the client team at the project outset. The database can be integrated into County/City and local municipal databases used as a facility management tool. The database is associated with mapping information and includes a number of attributes for both the existing and proposed network linkages. Staff responsible for implementation is encouraged to use the database as a tool when confirming the feasibility of trail routes and scheduling implementation. The tool can also assist provide operations staff with quick access to the location and characteristics of features within the network. This will enable more proactive planning of trail maintenance, will help to track work completed and can also be used to provide input to future budgeting. As improvements or additions are made to the network, the database should be updated so it remains up to date, and is a useful asset management tool. The following are some of potential uses of the tool for trail planning and management: ► Monitoring of the database on a regular basis with regular updates from staff implementing new trails; ► Tracking and documenting locations requiring attention and /or maintenance based on comments received from staff and the public, so that maintenance can be proactive as opposed to reactive; ► Tracking of actual costs for capital and maintenance work; ► Assisting staff with the identification of priorities and budgets for upcoming projects and providing background materials for staff reports to Council; and ► Using the most up to date information on new trails to inform future editions of the Elgin-St. Thomas Cycling and Hiking Trail Map. Use the GIS database developed during the development of the Elgin County Trails Study as the basis for a network implementation and asset management tool. Data generated should be incorporated into the existing R180 municipal database and also used to inform the development of promotion and outreach materials (e.g. maps) where appropriate. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 73 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r 4.3 FUNDING The planning, design and implementation of trails will require future investment by the County and its partners.While this study has not been designed to provide comprehensive costing for the proposed trail improvements, there is some direction provided on cost considerations. The considerations have been included to shape future discussions and to help inform future budgeting. 4.3.1 TRAIL CONSTRUCTION COSTS Appendix I D lists unit costs for the construction of various elements of the multi-use pathway network. These are based on averages obtained from recent local construction projects as well as others from across Ontario, and were used to develop an opinion of probable cost to construct the trail network. For reference purposes, Appendix I D also includes guideline unit costs for individual items/amenities that may be required on a site-specific basis. Unit costs (in 2018 dollars) are based on the following assumptions: ► The unit costs assume typical or normal/average conditions for construction. For example, unit prices assume good soil conditions, an average requirement for grading; ► Estimates do not include the cost of property acquisitions, utility relocations, driveway/entrance restorations, permits or approvals for construction; ► Costs associated with major site-specific projects such as bridges, railway crossings, retaining walls and stairways are not included; ► Annual inflation, which includes increased cost of labour, materials, fuel etc., is not included; and professional services and/or staff time for detailed design and applicable taxes are not included. As each trail segment becomes a priority for construction, a more detailed assessment as part of the design process will be required to determine site-specific conditions and design details. Detailed cost estimates can then be developed from the more detailed assessment. Table 5 provides a high-level cost for implementing the proposed trail routes as per Maps 4-0 to 4.8. The costing is based on a blended unit rate of the primary, secondary and tertiary unit costs identified in Appendix I D. The blended cost assumes the trails portion only and does not include site specific costs for individual features such as bridges, boardwalks and higher order road crossings (i.e. mid-block pedestrian signals and pedestrian crossovers) 74 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 Ir L CHAPTER 4.01 IMPLEMENTATION ! 1 r Table 5 1 Estimated Trail Construction Cost by Municipality MUNICIPALITYEXISTING PROPOSED BLENDED ESTIMATED • RATE CONSTRUCTION • AYLMER 4.0 3.7 7.7 $250 $925,000 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ BAYHAM 64.0 16.9 80.8 $150 $2,535,000 .................................................... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... CENTRAL 57.8 20.3 78.1 $250 $5,075,000 ...........................E_LG I N................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. DUTTON / 49.2 17.0 66.2 $150 $2,550,000 DUNWICH ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... MALAHIDE 46.8 2.1 48.9 $150 $315,000 SOUTHWOLD 67.5 27.9 95.3 $150 $4,185,00 ST.THOMS 43.3 11.0 54.3 $250 $2,750,000 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ WEST ELGIN 38.9 20.5 59.5 $150 $3.075,000 TOTAL 371.5 119.4 490.8 Ill $21,410,000 ... ................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Notes: . 1.Includes existing trails on lands owned by municipalities and public agencies(e.g.Conservation Authorities,the Provincial and Federal government.Also includes existing trails located on private property that have been established through agreements with individual landowners(i.e.applies to the Elgin Hiking Trail and some sections of the designated Great Trail/Trans Canada Trail) 2.Includes the(a)designated Great Trail/Trans Canada Trail route,(b)Great Lakes Waterfront Trail and(c)Elgin Hiking Trail.Portions of(a)and(b)are on-road,and some portions of(a)may not have been implemented.The Elgin Hiking Trail(c)is mapped based on information provided by stakeholders,and the entire route of the Elgin Hiking Trail could not be verified in the field. 3.Includes proposed routes identified during the development of the Elgin County Trail Study and proposed routes identified in previously approved local master plans such as the St.Thomas Trail Master Plan and Central Elgin Trails Master Plan. 4.Blended rate is based on the approximate portion of total proposed trails in each municipality that would be primary,secondary and tertiary. 5.Based on geographic boundary,and does include breakdown of how much of the estimated construction cost may be allocated to jurisdictions not listed in the table(e.g.County, conservation authorities or the Province). 4.3.2 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Funding to implement the trail network and supportive programs is intended to be a collaborative effort. It should not be the sole responsibility of the County or local municipalities. Potential external funding and partnership opportunities should be explored regularly and pursued wherever feasible to offset local costs. Not all funders will be an exact fit. For example, some may not fund trail securement but they will fund land securement for environmental conservation. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 75 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r This still may fit within the objectives of this strategy by utilizing securement partners, such as Conservation Authorities and land trusts. They can ensure the bulk of the land is protected in perpetuity while accommodating a trail network in the least environmentally sensitive areas of the land. Additionally, some funders support trail acquisition but municipal government may be ineligible. Partnerships with profit organizations with an interest/trail mandate may help to leverage funding from sources that may not be typically explored for trails. The following are some potential external funding sources that could be explored to support the implementation of trails and trail programs. The funding programs highlighted below were available at the time the Trails Study was prepared. It is not an exhaustive list and subject to change, therefore potential funding programs should be monitored regularly. Table 6 1 Potential External Funding Sources OPPORTUNITY DD • FEDERAL GAS TAX ► https://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/plan/gtf-fte- eng.html ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ FEDERATION OF ► https://fcm.ca/home/programs/green-municipal- CANADIAN fund.htm MUNICIPALITIES GREEN MUNICIPAL FUND ► For Federal Government: FEDERAL AND httr)s://www.canada.ca/en/office-infrastructure.html PROVINCIAL ► For Provincial Government INFRASTRUCTURE/ https://www.ontario.ca/page/ministry-infrastructure STIMULUS PROGRAMS ► https://www.ontario.ca/page/infrastructure-funding- small-communities ► https://otf.ca/ ONTARIO TRILLIUM ► Grants that broaden access, improve community FOUNDATION spaces to achieve a Priority Outcome ► From $5,000 to $150,000, available to charitable organizations ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ONTARIO RURAL ECONOMIC ► https://www.ontario.ca/page/rural-economic- DEVELOPMENT development-program PROGRAM 76 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 1' L CHAPTER IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITY ONTARIO SPORT AND ► As part of the Ontario Sport and Recreation RECREATION Communities Fund: COMMUNITIES FUND nLLpawvvvw.yranLa.ycw.UIIA-a/vranLsrUrLai/eriwntari oGrants/GrantOpportunities/PRDR006918 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT ► http://www.grants.gov.on.ca/GrantsPortal/en/0ntari FUND oGrants/GrantOpportunities/OSAPQA005130 ► htLp�:i/www.shell.ca/en_ca/sustainability/communit '`,anding-guidelines-p- ► Shell Canada's Social Investment Program supports community projects and initiatives that are located SHELL ENVIRONMENT near their facilities and exploration interests FUND throughout Canada ► Environment program supports Biodiveristy /Conservation efforts and improve local environment ► application will re-open January 02, 2019. ► Supports a wide range of environmental initiatives, with a primary focus on environmental education and green space programs TD FRIENDS OF THE ► Eligible projects include schoolyard greening, park ENVIRONMENT revitalization, community gardens, park FOUNDATION GRANT programming and citizen science initiatives ► https://www.td.com/corporate-responsibility/fef- grant.*ssp ► Includes Municipalities and First Nations ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... No. HSP allocates funds to projects that conserve and protect species at risk and their habitats ► Land must be located in a regional priority area and ENVIRONMENT CANADA i targeting a priority species HABITAT STEWARDSHIP ► A strong proposal for land acquisition must have PROGRAM FOR SPECIES confirmed SAR on the property or a property that is AT RISK identified as Critical Habitat for a SAR listed species ► https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate- change/services/environmental- fund ing/programs/habitat-stewardship-species-at- risk.html ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 77 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' r OPPORTUNITY ► Payments from environmental penalties are available to the community impacted by MINISTRY OF THE environmental violations to support eligible ENVIRONMENT, projects within that affected community CONSERVATION & PARKS ► Projects can include acquisition but restoration ONTARIO COMMUNITY projects will be given priority ENVIRONMENT FUND ► Available for Ontario Municipalities ► https://www.ontario.ca/pacie/ontario-community- environment-fund ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ► Regional Tourism Organization will be eligible to ONTARIO - MINISTRY OF receive additional funds where they can TOURISM, CULTURE AND demonstrate that they have received funds from SPORT SUPPORT FOR other sources in support of regional activities. ONTARIO'S TOURISM No. Partnership funding will be capped at a maximum REGIONS - PARTNERSHIP of 20 per cent of the proportional allocation to a FUNDING maximum of$1.5 million. ► nttp://www.mLc.y0v.on.ca/en/reyions/TUHUIny.sntml ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ► Grants focus on Eastern Canada (Ontario, Quebec and the Atlantic provinces),with a priority given to the protection of natural areas of ecological ECHO FOUNDATION importance ENVIRONMENT GRANT ► Also support, on a case-by-case basis, a variety of other concrete endeavours designed to promote and enhance sustainable environmental practices ► Available to Charitable Organizations ► httpa,�vww.fondationeci ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ► Supports three areas: Protection of wildlife species, K.M. HUNTER Stewardship of land, and Organizations that fight to FOUNDATION change the laws so that environmental areas can ENVIRONMENT GRANTS be protected ► https://www.kmhunterfoundation.ca/environment.h tml ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ► May consider land securement ► Provides grants with particular emphasis on MCLEAN FOUNDATION projects showing promise of general social benefit ENVIROMENT GRANT but which may initially lack broad public appeal ► Available to Charitable Organizations ► http://mcleanfoundation.ca/donation policy.html 78 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER •OPPORTUNITY ADDITIONAL DETAILS ► Protecting Critical Habitats, Environmental WESTON FOUNDATION Education, Revitalizing Urban Green Spaces LAND CONSERVATION No. Does not accept unsolicited proposals ► http://www.westonfoundation.org/our- initiatives/land-conservation/ No. Planning, construction and maintenance of MOUNTAIN EQUIPTMENT facilities or infrastructure such as trails, skills-parks CO-OP COMMUNITY or backcountry shelters GRANTS ► nLLps://www.mec.ca/en/expiore/spring-ana-rail- rg ants ► Provides grants for Land Protection Including Acquisition and unsolicited proposals that fit within GOSLING FOUNDATION the mandate of the Foundation ► http://www.goslingfoundation.org/index.cfm?page= GrantPrograms ► Rotary members contribute their skills, expertise, and resources to help solve some of the world's ROTARY CLUB toughest problems. Foundation grants bring service project ideas to life ONhttps://www.rotary.org/en/our-programs/grants LOCAL SERVICE CLUBS ► E.g. Lions, Optimist etc. The pursuit of external funding should be a collaborative effort to maximize access to various opportunities. The County, Local Municipalities and trail partners are encouraged to pursue the many diverse funding streams that are available, or that may become available moving forward. This should include the exploration of land trusts as a strategy to expand beyond the trail and active transportation partnerships and funding opportunities described above. In addition to capital funding, the County and the Local Municipalities should consider and explore other outside funding sources and cost-sharing opportunities to support R190 the implementation of the trails network, outreach and promotion programs. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 79 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r 4.4 PARTNERSHIPS The effort to implement the trails study and the future strategy will require significant coordination and collaboration. Relationships with existing partners should continue to be enhanced while new partnerships should be explored and fostered. The following is an overview of potential partnerships that should be continued or considered to facilitate the implementation of the study. 4.4.1 PARTNERS COUNTY Elgin County is applauded for demonstrating its commitment to promoting economic development and tourism through an integrated Economic Development and Tourism Services Department. The county's motto "Progressive by Nature" sets Elgin County apart from other communities. Trails development connects visitors and local people with nature and the many other amenities in the County. Elgin County is well positioned to play a leadership role in trails development through its capital works, marketing programs. These programs dovetail nicely with the County's planning, tourism and economic development strategies. The County is the best organization to encourage, support and oversee intermunicipal trail connections and links to adjoining municipalities. Elgin County is strategically situated in the centre of the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail network that extends from Lake Huron communities to Cornwall Ontario. Former rail lines traverse the County and connect with other adjoining communities to the east north and west. Former rail lines make ideal linear off-road trails connecting many communities. Elgin County is ideally suited to leading regional level trail initiatives and wayfinding branding given its established working relationships with the area municipalities, Conservation Authorities, Provincial Parks, Great Lakes Waterfront Trail and adjoining communities. 80 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION OCAL PA Local municipalities already play a lead role in developing, maintaining and providing trails and wayfinding for local trails with local trail partners. Although municipalities may enter into private access agreements with individual land owners to complete short missing trail links it is unlikely that the Municipality would establish extensive trails in the rural area using this arrangement. Therefore, the potential to develop additional long-distance trails in rural valley and wooded lands would be typically be limited to organizations such as the Elgin Hiking Trail Club. IF -OTHER TRAIL PARTNERS • � � Engrg= • has played a leadership role regarding active transportation and trail role for close to 10 years, and key role should continue. This role has included: ► Mobilizing the County and Local Municipalities and other local partners to collaborate on active transportation and trail planning and design through the Healthy Communities Partnership, ► promoting and active transportation and trails through the Active Elgin website. ► Sharing messages about the many benefits of trails and active transportation No. Leveraging partnerships and funding opportunities through networks available to public health organizations, some of which are typically not available to municipalities. i] Conr.ec.t Learn Lend a Hand 1 i l J r I vs Tore J MAe — _ -miNe.ey ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 1 81 L CHAPTER . • 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r • • • • • • • • • • • are responsible for developing, maintaining, providing wayfinding and promoting trails within their properties. Within Elgin County 4 conservation authorities are represented: Lower Thames Valley, Kettle Creek, Catfish Creek, and Long Point Region. All these agencies are important partners in a comprehensive strategy to promote and market Elgin County's trails given the majority of the destination trails in rural areas of the County are on lands owned and managed by the conservation authorities. • provides pan provincial trail information, wayfinding and updated on line trail mapping. https://waterirur1LLra11.Ury1 . The Great Trail (formerly branded as the Trans Canada Trail -Trans Canada Trail Foundation) provides pan Canadian trail information and updated on line mapping. https://thegreattrail.ca/ Both of these trail routes are part of the Elgin County trail network, therefore users of the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail and Great Trail have the opportunity to become connected with trails in Elgin County when exploring these trails and their websites. In addition to this indirect marketing and tourism support, the Trans Canada Trail Foundation has provided funding for connecting and developing the Great Trail Route, and the Waterfront Regeneration Trust has helped to leverage partnerships and establish the Waterfront trail route through the County and to neighbouring municipalities. • • • is a member driven-volunteer led, non- profit charity, that promotes the creation, development, preservation, management and use of recreational trails. Established in 1988 it is now the largest trail association of its type in Canada, with a membership consisting of over 220 economic development, tourism, planning, recreation, park and club organizations, municipalities, and conservation authorities. OTC's goals include continuing to increase the number, length, variety and accessibility of trails throughout the province; providing an informed, credible voice in support of trails; promoting the safe and responsible use of trails; and acting as a provincial resource centre for trail information and promotion. Elgin County, Catfish Creek Conservation Authority and the City of St. Thomas are currently members of the OTC. Other local municipalities and conservation authorities are also encouraged to become members. 82 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER L' • • • advocates for safe cycling and promotes safety. COU NTY H I KI NG CLU- httr)://www.elainhikinatrailclub.ora/is a dedicated group of hiking volunteers that promote safe and enjoyable hiking opportunities and actively maintains a very informative website, and visitors come to Elgin County to hike the Elgin Hiking Trail. Trail access points and the route can be very difficult to locate in some locations. The Elgin County Tourism office in Port Stanley is frequented by visitors seeking information on the Elgin Hiking Trail route and access points. As a volunteer organization the Elgin County Hiking Club is challenged by ongoing maintenance and trail improvements. To make the most of the opportunities the Elgin Hiking Trail presents as a tourism resource and attractor, collaboration and partnership with local municipalities and the County would provide a platform for improvements to trail access, maintenance, route marking, promotion and outreach. ZONE= is a volunteer organization that provides environmental land stewardship opportunities and advice for landowners within Elgin County, Ontario. They are partners in the management of some of the destination trail locations such as the Fingal Wildlife Management Area, and also partners with the 4 conservation authorities represented in Elgin County. As potential partners the Elgin Stewardship Council could provide have a role in developing, maintaining and promoting destination trails. They could also have a role in securing funding for specific trail -related projects in natural areas. ittp://www.elginstewardshipcouncil.com/ • are key partners. Elgin-St. Thomas is very fortunate to have a number of developers that understand the value that trails bring to the community and the neighbourhoods they create. Some have gone "above and beyond" to work in partnership with local municipalities to contribute to high quality, well connected trails within their developments and to surrounding neighbourhoods. Continuing to nurture these partnerships will have a significant positive impact as communities within Elgin County grow and prosper. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 83 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' r RAILS4 Establishment of a Trails Council comprised of County and local municipal staff stakeholders, representatives from Southwestern Public Health and Elgin County Tourism is should be considered. A Trails Council would work to coordinate the implementation of the strategy, share information related upcoming trail projects in each jurisdiction, develop and deliver encouragement, engagement, and promotion initiatives for the County's trails network, and share experiences and lessons learned from their own work and other jurisdictions. In the short term the Healthy Communities Partnership would continue to have the lead role. As the trail portfolio grows and more partners are engaged, a Trails Council could take on this role and would include representatives from the Healthy Communities Partnership as well as Local Municipalities, the County, Conservation Authorities and key stakeholder groups. The County and Local Municipalities should c - R20explore partnerships as a method to leverage trail . - - - - - to promotionand outreach. L The County, Municipality of Central Elgin and the Township of Southwold should explore collaborating with the Elgin F F Hiking Trail Club to better define and promote the Elgin R210F Hiking Trail route and trail accesspoints. The County of Elgin should assume a lead partner role in planning, developing and marketing regional scale trails R220 networks in concert with municipal and other partners. An Elgin Trails Council should be established in Elgin County, comprised of the various trails partners to plan and R230 F develop trails, market hiking and cycling opportunities, and provide consistent wayfincling throughout Elgin County. 84 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION 4.5 PROMOTION & OUTREACH The success of a trail strategy or study goes beyond the implementation of infrastructure. Initiatives and activities to encourage people to become more active and use trails and tools to educate people on safe and responsible trail use are critical to establishing long-term community and behavior change. Elgin County has a unique quality of place with rural landscapes, waterfronts,waterfront living and recreation. Recently, the County and its local municipal partners have been investing in, and strengthening the tourism sector. Attracting new residents to Elgin, including retirees and talented young workers who are leaving the larger cities such as those in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton area and seeking a more affordable and enjoyable lifestyle is one of the pillars of the tourism and economic development strategy. This investment in tourism and economic development is paying dividends as evidenced by new community growth and business opportunities in many areas of the County. Making the most of trail, active transportation and walkability opportunities, is an important part of this campaign to attract people to visit, reside in, and relocate business to Elgin County. Some ideas for marketing and promotion are listed below, some of which may have already been operationalized. Where this is the case, these initiatives should be reviewed and enhanced where appropriate. ► On-line trail resource hub linked to County, Municipal and Partners' websites ► Maps and materials at local venues ► Promoting at industry trade shows such as Outdoor shows, the Toronto Bike Show etc. ► Tourism marketing ► Attendance and promotion at festivals, events, fairs and Municipal Open House days ► Education and partnering with other agencies such as school boards, conservation authorities and Ontario Parks ► Encourage participation and active lifestyles ► Celebrate trail openings ► Deploying trail counters and user satisfaction surveys ► Developing consistent trail branding and signage. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 85 . CHAPTER 4.0 1 IMPLEMENTATION ' � r CountyThe • Local Municipalities • • review Countyeducation and outreach initiatives suggested in the Elgin R240 F' • • move forward with those IF, could be implemented as potential pilot initiatives. 86 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 • Soo CONCLUSION The Elgin County Trail Study has been developed as a long-term strategy and guide for trail design, development and promotion throughout Elgin-St. Thomas. It builds upon excellent trail work that has previously been completed by municipalities and stakeholders over the past several decades. Moving forward in a collaborative manner with quality trail infrastructure and a coordinated trail marketing approach will add significant value to the unique, affordable and enjoyable lifestyle the area offers. Key recommendations introduced throughout the report are summarized below, and are intended to provide direction on trail planning, design, maintenance; marketing and promotion. f17 . CHAPTER 5.0 1 CONCLUSION ' r # RECOMMENDATION Consideration should be given to including County and local municipal ' policies and/or schedules necessary to support trail development as part of an integrated approach to promoting healthy communities, tourism and local economic development. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Use the Route Selection Principles when undertaking detailed route 2 feasibility assessments for trail linkages identified as part of the trails network or when network routing changes are being considered. The proposed trail network in the Elgin County Trails Study should be 3 used as a blueprint for future network development and to inform trail priorities at the local municipal level. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Developers should be expected to work through an iterative process 4 with municipal staff, beginning early in the planning stages to create an appropriate trail network within their development area with links to external trails where appropriate. ................................................................1.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Municipalities should review the suggested approaches for ongoing S public participation for trails proposed in established neighbourhoods and determine an appropriate approach on a project-by-project basis. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Priority should be given to seizing opportunities to acquire former rail 6 corridors for future linear trail development to maximize the creation of off-road trail networks and interconnect communities and tourist destinations. I ......................................................................................................................................................................... Unopened road allowances are part of our Ontario heritage and should 7 be retained in public ownership in perpetuity for potential trails development. ................................................................1.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Consider opportunities that linear corridors such as unopened road 8 allowances, utility corridors and abandoned railway corridors create for trails. Develop a business case regarding the use of such corridors as part of the trail network before declaring no interest in them for trail use. ................................................................_.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Continue to explore potential opportunities for trails with rails in Elgin County on a case-by-case basis. ................................................................_.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 The County and Local Municipalities should explore a securement strategy for future trail routes on lands not in public ownership. ................................................................_.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 The County and Local Municipalities should use the trail design guidelines in the Elgin County Trail Study as the basis for trail design. 88 1 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 CHAPTER • CONCLUSION L # RECOMMENDATION i • �. r A consistent trail wayfinding identifier/brand should be used 12 throughout the County. Consider using the template established by the City of St. Thomas as the basis for the wayfinding identifier,with subtle variation to reflect individual municipalities within the County. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The risk management and liability prevention strategies should be reviewed and incorporated into day-to-day decision- making processes 13 where applicable when planning, designing and operating trails in Elgin County. Using the maintenance strategies outlined in Trails Study and current 14 Local Municipal trail maintenance practices as a starting point, Local municipalities should develop appropriate trail maintenance plans and budgets. ............................................................... Annual maintenance budgets should be refined to accommodate the 15 maintenance of trail facilities. Budgets should increase over time to correspond with the increase in the number/ length of trail facilities that have been implemented. ................................................... 1.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The County and Local Municipalities should consider the priority projects 16 and initiatives identified in the Elgin County Trails Study when deciding on the implementation of trails under their jurisdiction. ................................................................:.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1The Elgin County Trails Strategy should be updated in five years to 17 include trails that have been completed and to optimize new trail development opportunities that have been identified in the intervening time. ................................................................f.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Use the GIS database developed during the development of the Elgin County Trails Study as the basis for a network implementation and asset 18 management tool. Data generated should be incorporated into the existing municipal database and also used to inform the development of promotion and outreach materials (e.g. maps) where appropriate. ................................................................_.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... In addition to capital funding, the County and the Local Municipalities 19 should consider and explore other outside funding sources and cost- sharing opportunities to support the implementation of the trails network, outreach and promotion programs. ..............................................................._.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The County and Local Municipalities should continue to explore ZQ partnerships as a method to leverage trail implementation, management, maintenance, communication, promotion and outreach. ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY I REPORT I NOVEMBER 2018 1 89 . CHAPTER 5.0 1 CONCLUSION ' r # RECOMMENDATION The County, Municipality of Central Elgin and the Township of 21 Southwold should explore collaborating with the Elgin Hiking Trail Club to better define and promote the Elgin Hiking Trail route and trail access points. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The County of Elgin should assume a lead partner role in planning, 22 developing and marketing regional scale trails networks in concert with municipal and other partners. An Elgin Trails Council should be established by Elgin County comprised of the various trails partners to plan and develop trails, market hiking 23 and cycling opportunities, and provide consistent wayfinding throughout Elgin County. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The County and Local Municipalities should review the education and 24 outreach initiatives suggested in the Elgin County Trails Study and move forward with those that could be implemented as potential pilot initiatives. 90 ELGIN COUNTY TRAILS STUDY REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 REPORT CAO �rtunity I5 TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAOIClerk DATE: April 4, 2019 REPORT: CAO-27/19 SUBJECT: RFT 19-03 SALE OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT BACKGROUND: On February 21, 2019 the Municipality of Bayham issued RFT 19-03 Sale of Surplus Equipment, a copy of the same is attached hereto as Appendix `A'. DISCUSSION RFT 19-03 closed on March 28, 2019 at 11:00 AM. No bids were submitted pursuant to RFT 19-03. RFT 19-03 Sale of Surplus Equipment 1993 Case 850 G Long Track 1983 Triaxle Equipment Trailer RB - $20,000 RB-$2,500 RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-27/19 re RFT 19-03 Sale of Surplus Equipment be received for information; 2. AND THAT staff be delegated authority to surplus the equipment contained within RFT 19-03, at or above reserve bid value, in the where is, as is condition, via: • direct sale; • auction services; or • request for tender process. 3. AND THAT the proceeds of sale be allocated to the Public Works Equipment Reserve. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul Shipway CAOIClerk REQUEST FOR TENDER SALE OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT RFT 19-03 �puj•tunity ISSUE DATE: Thursday, February 21, 2019 CLOSING DATE: Thursday, March 28, 2019 CLOSING TIME: 11:00:00 A.M., local time LOCATION: Municipality of Bayham 56169 Heritage Line Straffordville, ON, Attention: Steve Adams Road Operations Supervisor LATE SUBMISSIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED Tenders must be submitted on this form, sealed in an envelope clearly marked RFT 19-03 Sale of Surplus Eauir)ment, not later than 11:00 A.M. Wednesday, March 28, 2019. • The highest or any tender not necessarily accepted. • All Surplus equipment shall be tendered and released in the `as seen', 'as is' condition. • Tenderers may bid on one, any or all items listed below. • The bids will be evaluated individually for each item, and not necessarily awarded to one bidder. • The successful bidder will be notified upon approval of Council following their regularly scheduled Council meeting to be held on Thursday April 4th, 2019. • The successful bidder shall be responsible for pick-up during regular hours of operation prior to May 3, 2019 at 3:30PM. • Surplus equipment shall be released in the `as seen' `as is' condition upon receipt of the accepted bid price, paid by cash, certified cheque or money order payable to the Municipality of Bayham. • As all items will be released in `as seen' `as is' condition all Surplus Equipment shall be viewable at the Public Works Yard located at 8354 Plank Road from 11AM-1 PM on the following days: • Thursday February 28, 2019 • Thursday March 7, 2019 • Thursday March 14, 2019 • Thursday March 21, 2019 • By appointment with Steve Adams, Road Operations Supervisor(sadams(a)bayham.on.ca) ITEMQYT. RESERVE PRICE PICTURES DESCRIPTION BID PRICE 1993 Case 850 G Long Track $ 16 Inch Pads 89 Net HP PTO for Winch Hookup 1 1 $20,000 6-Way Blade 6300 Hours Please Refer to AppendixHeat & Air Conditioner `A' for additional pictures 1983 Triaxle Equipment Trailer $ Pintle hitch $2,500 i 9 ton capacity 2018/2019 Safety Tool box 2 1 4 ft. adjustable ramps 2 ft. beaver tail Please Refer to Appendix16 ft. deck `B' for additional pictures 7 ft. wide New supply and service airlines Sub-Total $ 13% H.S.T. $ TOTAL $ COMPANY NAME: SIGNATURE: NAME (please print): ADDRESS: TEL. #: FAX#: E-MAIL: DATE: LL SURPLUS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE TENDERED AND RELEASED IN THE `AS SEEN', `AS IS' CONDITION. Appendix `A' 1993 Case 850 G Long Track — t AOP� r kt l N ----T v�7 pp . 1983 Triaxle Equipment Trailer K _ -%F r�'f-S�� �S5.•#.'F 7 Si^,�`.! wY K S - i l^KS'f tT 4,, •w THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2019-027 BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NO. 2019-017 A BY-LAW TO APPOINT BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Bayham on the 7th day of March, 2019 enacted By-Law 2019-017, being a by-law to appoint Board and Committee Members; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary to amend By-law 2019-017; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: THAT Schedule "A"to By-law 2019-017 to appoint Board and Committee Members for the Municipality of Bayham be amended as follows: THAT the following names be added to Section 13. Property Standards Committee: i. Cindy Stewart ii. Serge Pieters iii. Ken Wood iv. Paul Wood THAT in all other respects, By-law 2019-017 is hereby confirmed and remains unchanged; AND THAT this by-law shall come into force and take effect upon final passing. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 4th DAY OF APRIL 2019. MAYOR CLERK THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2019-028 BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NO. 2014-100 A BY-LAW RESPECTING THE MUNICIPAL POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM AND MUNICIPAL STORM SEWER SYSTEM IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SEWER CHARGES AND SEWER SURCHARGE RATES WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Bayham on the 211 day of October, 2014 enacted By- Law 2014-100, being a by-law respecting the Municipal Pollution Control System and Municipal Storm Sewer System in the Municipality of Bayham and the establishment of sewer charges and sewer surcharge rates; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary to amend By-law 2014-100; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: THAT Schedule "A"to By-law 2014-100 be amended to include Storm Sewer Connection Fees as follows: ITEM FEE Residential PDC Connection $4,000.00 Other/Commercial PDC Connection $5,250.00 THAT in all other respects, By-law 2014-100 is hereby confirmed and remains unchanged; AND THAT this by-law shall come into force and take effect upon final passing. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 4t" DAY OF APRIL 2019. MAYOR CLERK THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2019-029 Being a By-law to appoint William Menzie and Officers of Municipal Enforcement Unit as Municipality of Bayham Municipal Law Enforcement Officers for the purpose of enforcing provisions of Municipality of Bayham By-laws. WHEREAS pursuant to the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001 c.25, as amended, municipalities may appoint officers and employees as may be necessary for the purposes of the Corporation; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham has entered into an agreement with William Menzie, Carrying on Business as MEU Consulting for the provision of Municipal Law Enforcement Services; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary and expedient to appoint William Menzie and Officers of Municipal Enforcement Unit as Municipal Law Enforcement Officers / Provincial Offences Officers for the Municipality; NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham enacts as follows: 1. THAT William Menzie and Officers of Municipal Enforcement Unit are hereby appointed to act in the capacity of Municipal Law Enforcement Officer/ Provincial Offences Officer for the Municipality of Bayham. 2. AND THAT this by-law shall come into force and take effect immediately upon third and final reading thereof. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED, this 4t" day of April, 2019. MAYOR CLERK THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2019-030 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM AND FRANKLIN CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham is desirous of entering into an agreement with Franklin Construction for the construction of the Port Burwell Pavilion and Public Washroom NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be and are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement attached hereto as Schedule "A" and forming part of this by-law between Franklin Construction and the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham; 2. AND THAT this by-law shall come into full force and effect upon final passing. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 4t" DAY OF APRIL, 2019. MAYOR CLERK THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2019-031 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM ALL ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM FOR THE REGULAR MEETING HELD APRIL 4, 2019 WHEREAS under Section 5 (1) of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O. 2001, Chapter 25, the powers of a municipal corporation are to be exercised by the Council of the municipality; AND WHEREAS under Section 5 (3) of the Municipal Act, 2001, the powers of Council are to be exercised by by-law; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it advisable that the proceedings of the meeting be confirmed and adopted by by-law. THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham in respect of each recommendation and each motion and resolution passed and other action by the Council at the regular meeting held April 4, 2019 is hereby adopted and confirmed as if all proceedings were expressly embodied in this by- law. 2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham are hereby authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the action of the Council including executing all documents and affixing the Corporate Seal. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 4t" DAY OF APRIL, 2019. MAYOR CLERK