The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSeptember 15, 2016 - Council THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MUNICIPAL OFFICE 9344 Plank Road, Straffordville, ON Council Chambers Thursday, September 15, 2016 7:00 p.m. 7:30 p.m. — Public Meeting — Planning/Zoning — Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment 31 Elizabeth Street 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 3. REVIEW OF ITEMS NOT LISTED ON AGENDA 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS 5. DELEGATIONS A. 7:00 p.m. —Jessica Lang, Health Promoter, Elgin St. Thomas Public Health and Dan McNeil, Councillor for Central Elgin and Chair of the Healthy Communities Partnership re Get Active Elgin Strategy B. 7:10 p.m. - Amanda Froese, Project Manager, Meritech Engineering re Port Burwell Master Drainage Study 2016 EA Report 6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING(S) A. Regular Meeting of Council held September 1, 2016 B. Public Meeting held September 1, 2016 re Gregory Underhill Farms Limited 7. MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF MOTION 8. RECREATION, CULTURE, TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8.1 Correspondence 8.1.1 Receive for Information 8.1.2 Requiring Action 8.2 Reports to Council 9. PHYSICAL SERVICES — EMERGENCY SERVICES 9.1 Correspondence 9.1.1 Receive for Information 9.1.2 Requiring Action 9.2 Reports to Council 2016 Council Agenda September 15, 2016 10. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSERVATION 10.1 Correspondence 10.1.1 Receive for Information A. Notice of Public Meeting re Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment 31 Elizabeth Street 10.1.2 Requiring Action 10.2 Reports to Council A. Report DS-36/16 by Bill Knifton re Petition for Drainage from Road Authority B. Report DS-38/16 by Margaret Underhill, Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator re Rezoning Application — Gregory Underhill Farms Limited C. Report DS-39/16 by Margaret Underhill, Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator re Site Plan Agreement— Max Underhill's Farm Supply SPA-05/16 11. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION 11.1 Correspondence 11.1.1 Receive for Information A. Long Point Region Conservation Authority 2016 Mid Year Review B. Multi-Service Centre September 2016 E-Letter C. Elgin Economic Development August 2016 Newsletter D. Ontario Good Roads Association re OGRA Conference E. Ministry of Energy re Energy Consumer Protection Act 11.1.2 Requiring Action A. Township of Malahide re Terrace Lodge — Fundraising Committee B. Port Burwell Historical Society re Ship's Wheelhouse Project 11.2 Reports to Council A. Report CAO-55/16 by Paul Shipway, CAO re Municipal Alcohol Policy B. Report CAO-56/16 by Paul Shipway, CAO re 2017 Council Schedule 2016 Council Agenda September 15, 2016 12. BY-LAWS A. By-Law Z652-2016 Being a By-law to further amend By-law Z456-2003 (Gregory Underhill Farms B. By-Law 2016-080 Being a By-law to authorize the execution of a site plan agreement between Max Underhill's Farm Supply and The Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham C. By-Law 2016-081 Being a By-law to appoint staff to perform duties under the Ontario Building Code Act 13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 14. OTHER BUSINESS A. Discussion regarding parking at the Municipal lot (Marine Museum) in Port Burwell 14.1 In Camera 14.1 Out of Camera 15. BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF COUNCIL A. By-Law 2016-082 Being a By-law to confirm all actions of Council 16 ADJOURNMENT Ontario ,� Fondation Trillium Trillium Foundation �,l` de['Ontario igeZ 4d&e 9e :(th e Gvovemman1°f0n1aro I &. . . E LG I N ST.THOMAS m 9 ernemen1tle10-- PUBLIC HEALTH BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRILLIUM FUNDING YOUR HEALTHY COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP We have an opportunity to expand on a new funding source that will provide considerable benefit to the citizens of every - success we will be asking . supportyour continued participation and Partnership including your staff contribution half-day consultation on Wednesday October 5t' at the Malahide Community Place in Springfield. M In 2011, the Healthy Communities Partnership better and healthier communities, regardless Dwas convened with representation from both of funding. However, the Ontario Trillium Foun- n elected officials and key staff from each munici- dation became aware of this success and their pality within Elgin St. Thomas to take advantage regional staff believe our Partnership is a good of funding pr #Health and example of how they may choose to role out a Lo a exam- ne �ding formula under "Collective Impact". err Cyr --1ve;impact occurs when organizations from nded. e ' n '`sectors agree to solve a specific'Sochi, Unid- o sjng a common agenda, aligning %" r=' �► � .. way `build N sing cpmmon measures of success-, ... ., i 1 fir i s ;., �, y 141 -ter. �'��. �. } I t Key Community Imp ents Thro cal .P In 2009, www.activeelgin.ca wa I3, Elgin St. Tho e In reated with funds received fro re the Road co by ed the Elgin° St. Th'om�as Cycll he Ontario Trillium Foundation.T ing residents wer d Master Plan ,an 5i'mplementation' Jl r ebsite helps residents find rec- gh road signage mu- began. The tive Transports-; regtional and leisure opportunities y campaigns. In a a lo- tion .Tec.hpical Committee; largely. �A' vailable across Elgi tl Citizens 4 Activ ation municipal staff, was instri� group was e and to the production of the pa In ' *�Active Transportation was advocate for safe and accessible St. Thomas, several signed bicy- identified as a key priority based on ways to walk, hike, run and bike in cle routes have now been installed community input and local data. As Elgin St. Thomas. Among other ad- while all of the municipalities have a result, the Healthy Communities vocacy activities, this group contin- contir&edonaeetpa�e... �pYx Partnership developed the Elgin St. ues to have a presence at commu- OPPO+f°eity tsY°�y Thomas Active Transportation Ini- nity events such as the Downtown TOWNSHIP OF tiative to increase rates of walking, Bicycle Festival and the Seniors Malahide cycling and hiking in our community. Picnic. All, oYY°uYY,i"ec,a°a,a ++ 1V ilil.r // ' E� igll]COIl 11ty Mumapality of ° °re col Dutton Dunwich I committed to adding new paved lars from the Public Health Agency with many other new developments shoulders to their roadways. The of Canada. With matching dollars in Elgin County. County of Elgin has added paved from the local developers, a new ` shoulders on Highway 73 and Sun- Creating Connections Project was set Road has been designated a launched. This project aims to im- bike route. Other municipalities are prove the built environment to adding more signage. support increased rates of physical activity while engaging families, In 20I5, Elgin St. Thomas Public community members and municipal Health, the City of St. Thomas and officials to improve the walkability three local developers collective- within the City of St. Thomas over ly received almost one million dol- 5 years. This is also being mirrored The "Ge 4A1e 1? Trillium Funding Initiative According to the 2009-2010 Canadian Community our residents to have more opportunities and incentives Health Survey, the Elgin St Thomas region ranked the to be more active. worst of 36 regions across the Province when it came to self reported rates of physical activity during their We need to recruit municipal staff from parks and leisure time. Building on its accomplishments since recreation, planning, community services and others 2011,the Healthy Communities Partnership successfully from across the County to participate in a municipal applied for and received $20,000 from the Ontario consultation on Wednesday October 5th. This half-day Trillium Foundation to build the case for "Get Active consultation will be held at the Malahide Community Elgin". The next step is to show how we are going to Place in Springfield with lunch after. Feedback from work towards the goal: "Elgin St Thomas will be the the field will help to inform a long-term strategy with most active community in the Province within 5 years". the anticipated goal of positively impacting the health status and physical activity rates of Elgin St. Thomas In 2017, with anticipated support from all residents. municipalities, the Partnership hopes to secure $500,000/year for up to five years to implement a The Healthy Communities Partnership requests that coordinated long-term strategy for Get Active Elgin. each municipal council in Elgin St. Thomas adopt a Under Trillium rules this funding can be used for resolution to work together on a City and County wide capital/infrastructure projects. Our approach to Trillium collective strategy for "Get Active Elgin", with the aim is to use a collective impact model to facilitate working to secure Trillium funding. together to leverage projects that are probably already �aYxanr in each Municipalities budgets as well as in our five year Oppooi��gYooe planning cycle. This regional approach will enable all of 0 -WN1 Malahide ST THON AS /IEIS Municipality of DuttonDunwich .�,+(" Port Burwell Master Drainage Study August 2016 Municipality of Bayham 'At MERIT ECH 1315 Bishop Street North, Suite 202 Cambridge, ON N1R 6Z2 f 519.623.7334 tunity Y5 www.meritech.ca Project No.: 4423 MERI _-r EVR August 12, 2016 Mai iil•ipality of Sayham 93,+,+ Plank Road 51rarrurdville Un IQUJ 1YU Attention: Mr. Paul 5hipway UU—, Municipality of BdyFidm Dear Mr. SFlipwdy, Re: Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Munic2spaGry wr Barham Please find enclosed our Master Drainage Study for the village of Port Surwell. i his repot[ vva5 milt np'vn tMe previou3 vvorR prepares ror tRe Planicipality tFiat isentires the problem ztatement. Porff garwell reyaire�3 remedidtion of tFie storm sewer system. TFie opportunity to design this storm system for future development and to incorporate cMe village as a CUMP171e ZyZMrM vvZ7.3 enplvrcEl vvitMii i tMia ,toMy. i he recornmensationz rrom tRe -)taciy allow the Manicipcility to implement the villaye-wide storm sewer network throuyh individual infrastructure projects. o x 1 Fie stady tollowed t5e Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process and was confirmed as a schedule 6. Notice of Completion or iMe Study will 6e sa6mitted aoncarrently vvitM tMi-, mpuff. W L 3 Yours very truly, 3 YPOF�SSION,q�� MEtu i EC EIgUtIgEERtIqv �. �. z' Cf1 W 1 uuu44355 'J Nman a i. Froez e P. Eng. FEtr Sei iior Project Manayer /*E OF ON0P� Hr/ Encb5urE5(1) cc ®Consulfin-y Ej.y noo `/ 1'. t�,,:....I!r.K:, mrvzaif+ R:\Projects\z+z+/.s\60-Design\CEA\Po.r.6urwell rap-in--�btea,,d,;� Puy_1 of Ontario Merite..h Engineering 1315 Bishop St.North Suite 202 Cambridge ON NiR vzz t 3Z7.u33.11,u >1y$L-i.7334 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Executive Summary Port Burwell is a village comprised predominantly of residential homes, with some commercial and tourism businesses, and is located in the Municipality of Bayham. The existing road network is comprised of local streets with road-side swales, catchbasins and storm sewers, with County roads having curb and gutter and storm sewers. The storm sewers on Municipality and County roads intertwine and share outlets, which are either to the Lake Erie beach or to Big Otter Creek. A Storm Sewer System Assessment and a Storm Sewer Costs Assessment Report were completed in 2015 for Port Burwell and Vienna. This information, along with new information provided by Elgin County, formed the background for this study. Known historical flooding concerns raised by residents, combined with results from an existing conditions assessment, lead to the conclusion that the village of Port Burwell needed a review of the storm sewer system as a whole. The Master Drainage Study is proposed to provide a guideline to future reconstruction works for remediation of storm sewers and the drainage network. The Class EA process was followed as Schedule B was identified for some of the potential options. Consultation with residents, taxpayers, and agencies was seen as important to the outcome of the study. Four alternatives were evaluated within the study: Alternative # 1: Do Nothing Leave the existing system in its current condition. Portions are clogged or broken and do not convey flows, portions appear not to have an outlet, and some sewers are located on private property. Alternative # 2: Repair the Existing System This alternative involves designing a system that is within the same alignment, location, and is the same size as the existing system. The sewer capacity would not be increased to carry larger storm flows; sewers would remain within private property and easements may be requested. All outlets would remain in this option. Alternative #3: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using the Existing Outlet Locations This includes increasing pipe sizes throughout the village, with sewers sized to convey the 5-year storm event but maintaining the locations, but not the size, of all the existing outlets. Alternative #4: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, with New Outlets This option involves sizing the storm sewer network for the future needs of the municipality. Increased pipe sizes throughout the village would be required to convey the 5-year storm event. An evaluation of which outlets should remain or be removed - or if new outlets should be added — adds to the completeness of this alternative. R\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page i MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study The evaluation of the alternatives included conveyance capacity, completeness of the system, physical environment, social environment, and financial considerations. Based on the analysis, Alternative #4, designing the system with new sewers to re-designed outlets based on new drainage divides, was the preferred alternative. The Master Drainage Plan includes the determination of drainage catchments and preliminary sizing of storm sewers. Proposed outlet sizes and locations have also been identified, to be included in future detailed design and construction projects. Implementing the recommended system upgrades requires cooperation with Elgin County, and it is recommended that the Municipality request that the County include the recommended storm sewer works within County roads within their road works program or that the two agencies work together on funding programs for the work. Other recommendations include implementing an annual catchbasin cleaning program using vacuum trucks such that catchbasins are cleared and will function as much as possible prior to and after reconstruction. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page ii MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Disclaimer This report was prepared by Meritech Engineering for the Municipality of Bayham. The comments, recommendations and materials presented in this report reflect our best judgement in light of the information available at the time of preparation. Except for approval and commenting municipalities and agencies in their review and approval of this project, any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance upon, or decisions as a result of, are the responsibility of such third parties. Meritech Engineering accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party, other than an approval or commenting municipality or agency, as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this report. Use and Reproduction of This Document No part of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transcribed in any form, or by means including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording and scanning without the prior written approval of the author. For Further Information For further information regarding this report please contact the author at the following address: Meritech Engineering Attention: Mr. Ian S. Robertson, P.Eng. Director of Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North, Suite 202 Cambridge, ON N1R 6Z2 t (519) 623-1140 f (519) 623-7334 email: ianr@meritech.ca R\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page iii MERIT ECM Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................. 3 Background .............................................................................................................. 4 StudyPurpose........................................................................................................... 4 Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA)........................................................... 4 Master Plan Process ............................................................................................... 6 Consultation and Notification................................................................................... 6 Notice of Commencement....................................................................................... 6 Public Information Centre ....................................................................................... 7 ProblemStatement....................................................................................................... 7 ExistingCondition...................................................................................................... 7 LandUse............................................................................................................... 8 Floodplain.............................................................................................................. 8 CurrentPolicies...................................................................................................... 8 Existing Drainage Network...................................................................................... 9 Storm System Parameters......................................................................................10 ProposedAlternatives ..................................................................................................11 Alternative # 1: Do Nothing ......................................................................................11 Alternative # 2: Repair the Existing System................................................................11 Alternative #3: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using the Existing Outlet Locations.12 Alternative #4: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, with Fewer Outlet Locations ..........13 Evaluation of Alternatives.............................................................................................14 Summary of the Evaluation .......................................................................................18 Alternative #1: Do Nothing ....................................................................................18 Actions Necessary for Implementation .................................................................18 Alternative #2: Repair the Existing System..............................................................18 Actions Necessary for Implementation .................................................................18 Alternative #3: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using Existing Outlet Locations...18 Actions Necessary for Implementation .................................................................19 Alternative #4: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using New Outlet Locations........19 Actions Necessary for Implementation .................................................................19 PreferredAlternative....................................................................................................19 Design Considerations...............................................................................................19 Flooding of Private Property...................................................................................20 Priorityof Work.....................................................................................................20 Drainage ..............................................................................................................20 East Beach Design Project......................................................................................21 Catchbasin Cleanout Program.................................................................................21 DesignParameters................................................................................................21 Implementation...........................................................................................................21 Priorities..................................................................................................................22 Category ..............................................................................................................22 ExistingCondition .................................................................................................22 Cost Estimate Assumptions .......................................................................................23 DeterminingStage Limits..........................................................................................27 DesignObjectives.....................................................................................................28 DesignCriteria .........................................................................................................28 General ................................................................................................................28 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 1 MERIT ECM Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Roads ..................................................................................................................30 Sewers.................................................................................................................30 Runoffcoefficients: ............................................................................................30 Design storm parameters: ..................................................................................31 Frames and Grates/Covers..................................................................................31 Catchbasi ns.......................................................................................................31 Manholes ..........................................................................................................31 Outlets..............................................................................................................32 Service Connections...........................................................................................32 List of Figures Figure 1: Port Burwell Study Area .................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Municipal Class EA Process.............................................................................. 5 Figure 3: Port Burwell Storm Network (1981).................................................................. 9 Figure 4: Storm Sewer System Existing Condition...........................................................10 Figure 5: Repair the Existing System .............................................................................11 Figure 6: Replace System, Same Outlet Locations...........................................................12 Figure 7: Replace System, Fewer Outlet Locations..........................................................13 Figure 8: Section Classifications ....................................................................................24 Figure 9: Existing Conditions.........................................................................................25 Figure10: Priorities .....................................................................................................26 Figure11: Staging Plan................................................................................................29 List of Tables Table 1: Floodline Elevations ......................................................................................... 8 Table 2: Evaluation Criteria...........................................................................................14 Table 3: Evaluation of Alternatives................................................................................17 Table 4: Cost Estimates by Priority................................................................................23 Table 5: Stage Creation Methodology Comparison..........................................................27 Table 6: Cost Estimates by Stage..................................................................................28 Appendices Appendix A: Public Consultation Appendix B: Existing Documents Appendix C: Storm Drainage Area Plans and Sewer Design Sheets Appendix D: Priority Ranking Tables Appendix E: Proposed Stages and Rough Cost Estimate Tables F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 2 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Introduction Located in the Municipality of Bayham, Port Burwell is a village comprised predominantly of residential homes, with some commercial and tourism businesses mostly related to the beach. The existing road network is comprised of local streets, with road side swales, catchbasins and storm sewers. The County roads have curb and gutter and storm sewers. The storm sewers on Municipality and County roads are inter-connected and share outlets. The outlets are to either the Lake Erie beach or to Big Otter Creek. Figure 1 shows an aerial map of the study area. 1 �fay i Y 1 I y P . v � Figure 1: Port Burwell Study Area F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 3 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Background The Master Drainage Study is founded on the development of a comprehensive understanding of existing urban drainage conditions. This was accomplished through detailed investigation of the existing drainage system. The current approach built upon the analysis completed as part of the Storm Sewer System Assessment and Storm Sewer Costs Assessment Report, both prepared by Meritech Engineering in 2015 for Port Burwell and Vienna, but provides substantial added detail regarding the urban infrastructure. These reports will be referred to as "the 2015 reports"throughout this Master Drainage Study. The previous investigation found that many sewers in Port Burwell were in disrepair and in need of replacement. Other sewers were found to be of sizes smaller than the industry standard and there are many outlets to be maintained. Residents' concerns over historic flooding were brought to the team's attention at this time as well. It was recognized by the Municipality that attention was needed on the system, but budgetary constraints also needed consideration. The opportunity to review the village as a whole system became evident as an answer to the question "where do we start?". Study Purpose The Master Drainage Study is proposed to provide a guideline to future reconstruction works for remediation of storm sewers and the drainage network. The Class EA process was followed as Schedule B was identified for some of the potential options. Consultation with residents, taxpayers, and agencies was seen as important to guide the outcome of the study. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) The planning of major municipal infrastructure projects or activities is subject to the Environmental Assessment (EA) Act, R.S.O. 1990, and requires the proponent to complete an Environmental Assessment. The Municipal Class EA process was developed by the Municipal Engineers Association, in consultation with the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). This process is an alternative method to Individual Environmental Assessments for recurring municipal projects that are similar in nature, usually limited in scale, have a predictable range of environmental impacts, and are responsive to mitigating measures. The Class EA solicits input and approval from regulatory agencies, the municipality, and the public at the local level. This process leads to an evaluation of the alternatives in view of the significance of environmental impacts and the choice of effective mitigation measures. The Class EA describes the process that proponents must follow in order to meet the requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act. As presented in Figure 2, it is a five- phase process that extends from problem identification through to detailed design. The three types of projects to which the Class EA process applies to are: • Schedule 'A' projects. These are limited in scale, have minimal adverse environmental effects, and include the majority of municipal road maintenance and R\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 4 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study operation activities. These projects are pre-approved and may proceed to implementation without following any additional steps of the Class EA planning process • Schedule 'B' projects. These have the potential for some adverse environmental effects. They are subject to a screening process which includes contacting directly- affected public and relevant review agencies. Design includes progressing through Phase 1 (Problems and Opportunities) and Phase 2 (Alternative Solutions) • Schedule 'C' projects, which have the potential for significant environmental effects. These projects must proceed under the full planning and documentation procedures specified in the Class EA document - Phase 1 to Phase 4 The Municipal Class EA provides an opportunity for any member of the public or agency to request the Minister of the Environment to order a Class EA project to become subject to an Individual Environmental Assessment. This is known as a Part II Order (or ]'bump-up") request and is made in certain circumstances where concerns are unresolved during the Class EA planning process. For further details the reader should refer to the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment manual (MEA, October 2000, as amended 2007 & 2011). SE PHASE OPPORTUNrry r r r wFYmsv uFF]wx]wr �'M-� xn]Yu]FU 0[90N r�c`fvr3 r Cil4Pik'I!G+1IYTMCT G0.0P40P]IRrM w`r 5'MC{[ 6GlYil[YY fen RnpY MlPaH'1'(Epgl MAx.W�N�+W 11 �FrAFA rcr9 8.1 []NIM�FNEMrri a F+Rat6 RMHR tl]Mr�]rOM]A�YI ]eo�T�re aE`n�w I M!F]> -'r—1—A,11- urtr frxrnrc w.�.r�n[c:� � cnaFi-ut�o PAOtlEi]I Oq wFortnr.irf a�•—— fNnrYOM]EY[] A CrlW11G!! NMKE LH Ot.�tlTldl W TO RlNP1Y WEMLfE `--'— >iNNIMONY+HiuFlx � q`. _ - MT r•[191C fIa'rEw�.iww:+gl[T1ri ]ocl+r.EcoNOSeMi TFlOf2id ]�OBInly IEIIAF:T PF E(IHIINF.I.YE}]Ll] L'WY'fi y�ruarM EeuE�vlrwcNl Ni (M fNNt11Gp1CN4.•Ke r]G�YCE 9FR'FTV� YOM114h Fpti �h brmxwnn t/IOOFINO Mwu f]h'+11GFMRfaFNt mFNT]'Y']naGi n r OM i++E ENn�vENf. fA +�+9 MTiGATN6 rLil5utlf9 0R I ]IWLWR{RLTEq/F1aVE ] JIII eeanwa:iersYrna lonawRn r[. IIFMW51lNFFT f�FGNW N!W!R[RiFRRII]'R[InN ...�. ID 6Ar4 C<MGTIPCAIR N ]O NEWF.a]N][WFA' `fv,4URfE urf'�M.�rFrt h5R rlRp]R• y} nFeowe�eo 7 t �pFtr]i CCSgy[.pfNr$]] c:TYa M41GE[R rR[VI(i1RY -- trMRN:4Tew FFe•RrSD MA.r:. �y raRtuLLXKHIMYLM � MYI�V 4/11lY -- :,w r11441!]M11[t RGURIpM ~ lWleG�4 4LI. nF[� .]HFlFa� —} QM5ix*+�oN `M1 cIKFlm IiyAl.NpIU WRMOH w..TEw'5 rr wRrNp]f ] WI.EC rvF]]RAlI+ r-W y]['aYE[JFF BF<Fi hlldAMM NW9rEm9' fIXAffltW � �� c:£A7M1 MWEc�:+tl nsq�(yi cam�vrw]. � ��— �]C1E➢yLF. ^/"fW hIp CCNIfW � f NIANWrI} — —,/' MfGIE]A]aeM�S M.RS — — � .w..wnrrella.�'CavuEr.�fa CI rYlpigll!^+Fl[SION � n[er]]X 1pe.r rf+c+rort v snlmr.0 Figure 2: Municipal Class EA Process F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 5 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Master Plan Process The Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process (EA) provides for comprehensive Master Plans such as the Port Burwell Master Drainage Study. By following the Municipal Class EA process the proponent (Municipality of Bayham) will satisfy Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the EA process. A Master Plan is usually developed when a series of work is needed throughout the study area (i.e. when not one single solution to the problem is ideal). The focus of a Master Plan is to review a system (in this case the storm runoff conveyance network) in its entirety and develop the framework in which future improvements, works, and development should be implemented. This process facilitates the long-range goals of the municipality. Often the proposed alternatives outlined in the Master Plan are each individually subject to the Municipal Class EA process. With this in mind, it has been confirmed to complete the Master Plan in conjunction with the Municipal Class EA, Phase 1 and Phase 2, in order to comply with the needs of a Schedule B Municipal Class EA. Should any recommended alternative requiring Schedule C works be completed, Phases 3 to 5 of the EA would need to be completed at a later date. The primary advantage of completing the study in accordance with the Class EA guidelines is that it provides a comprehensive framework for soliciting public input and documenting the alternatives that have been considered. It will also streamline the implementation of study recommendations in that the Municipality will be able to simplify the process required for implementing the report's recommendations. Consultation and Notification As part of the Municipal Class EA procedure, public notices are published and information meetings are held to keep the public informed of the process and allow for public involvement in the selection of a preferred alternative. Public consultation is an important and vital part of the environmental assessment process and is provided in Phase 2 under a Schedule B project. A kick-off meeting was held with the Municipality of Bayham and Elgin County staff on January 29, 2016 to establish the direction of the EA process. Minutes are attached in Appendix A. Notice of Commencement The notice was issued on February 26, 2016 to the Bayham website (www.bayham.on.ca) and posted in the Alymer Times on March 2, 2016. The notice is enclosed in Appendix A. The following agencies were circulated the notice with the request for comments: • Elgin County • Long Point Conservation Authority • Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (Regional and Environmental Approvals Branch) • Port Burwell Provincial Park R\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 6 MERIT ECM Port Burwell Master Drainage Study • Elgin County Tourism • Thames Valley District School Board • Port Burwell Public School • Ministry of Natural Resources (Southern Regional Office) • Ministry of Natural Resources (Aylmer District Office) • Department of Fisheries and Oceans • Ministry of Infrastructure • Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport • Union Gas • Hydro One • Port Burwell Public Utilities • Rogers • Wightman Telecom • Eastlink • Transport Canada • Otter Valley Utility Corridor & (Rail) Trail Board of Management • Bayham Harbourfront Committee • Environment Canada Public Information Centre Notice of the Public Meeting was posted in the Aylmer Times on June 8, 2016, as well as posted at the Museum, Public Washrooms, the LCBO and on the website at www.bayham.on.ca on June 8, 2016. The notice is enclosed in Appendix A. Residents were given the opportunity to review the presentation boards and ask questions of the project team. Copies of the boards were also posted on the municipality's website and circulated to agencies and individuals who had indicated interest in staying informed. Copies of the boards and resident survey forms are in Appendix A. Problem Statement Known historical flooding concerns raised by residents, combined with results from an existing conditions assessment, led to the conclusion that the village of Port Burwell needed a review of the storm sewer system as a whole. This provided the opportunity to review the number, size, and location of outlets to Big Otter Creek and the Lake Erie Beach. The analysis is to review alternative solutions and determine which is best suited for the Municipality of Bayham and the village of Port Burwell, to provide an appropriate drainage system for current and future conditions. Existing Condition Understanding the environment surrounding Port Burwell is important to understanding the proper solution to implement within the village. The existing condition includes understanding the potential for future growth along with land use, floodline elevations, and the drainage network and storm events. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 7 MERIT ECM Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Land Use Elgin County describes Port Burwell as a Tier 1 settlement, which means it generally has a larger population and full municipal services. The County's Official Plan provides language to the goals of the community in regards to economic development, tourism, growth, and environmental protection. New growth is expected to be more concentrated in Tier 1 areas, including Port Burwell. In the Municipality of Bayham's Official Plan the village of Port Burwell it recognized as having the capability of accommodating growth. This growth is restricted to predominantly single family residential low-density housing with a target of 20 units per hectare. The Harbour Residential/Commercial designation allows for densities from 35 up to 75 units per hectare (apartments) and requires Site Plan Control. Appendix B includes copies of the Municipality's Official Plan "Land Use and Constraints" map and the Municipality's Zoning By- law mapping. Floodplain The Long Point Region Conservation Authority provided values for the 100-year and Regional Flood elevations. Table 1 shows the ranges of the elevations. The 100-year elevation for Lake Erie of 175.7 is confirmed on the 2015 Elgin County Lake Erie Shoreline Hazards mapping. Location Cross-section 100- ear elevation Regional storm elevation Big Otter Creek at Lake 1.0 174.20 174.85 Big Otter Creek, 5.0 176.11 177.37 downstream at bridge Lake Erie -- 175.7 -- with wind set-up) *from Vittoria, Port Ryerse, Lynedoch and Port Burwell Floodline Mapping Study April 1987, MacLaren Engineers Table 1: Floodline Elevations Current Policies The Official Plan (Bayham) requires new residential units, mobile trailer parks and commercial developments to provide adequate stormwater management/drainage to the satisfaction of the Municipality. For development in the Harbour Residential/Commercial area, flooding is to be reviewed for Site Plan Approval. Water conservation and water use efficiency is encouraged and promoted by the Municipality. Under "Community Improvement Goals and Objectives" the Municipality set an objective to improve conditions in "older deteriorating but potentially stable and predominantly residential areas or neighbourhoods so as to maintain their long-term viability" (7.1.2.1). F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 8 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Existing Drainage Network The Storm Sewer System Assessment, Meritech 2015 VILLAGEOF describes the storm sewer system k of Port Burwell. A survey of each structure located within the village of Port Burwell was done using � r,wd GPS (minus County infrastructure), and was added to the Municipality's database. CCTV inspection of the sewers was done from these .1P' `—�' '• - �.i Fe H � If7LLlAM ST structures to determine condition,and to piece together the existing _networks. Since the issuance of 4t F - _ -- that report, further information was n made available by Elgin County. — w _HJNNG .ST The overall network from 1981 is _JJATe Lno ST; shown in Figure 3. - Robinson Street (County Roads 19 j and 42 between Bridge Street and ---_- EL' eNG TON _ ST Y AZA° ; Victoria Street and County Roads _ 19 and 142 between Bridge Street and Wellington Street, shown as _ w Union St. and Erieus St. on Figure p;fr " N ST 3), Victoria Street (County Road 50 a between Wellington Street and Robinson Street) and Wellington v �' Street (County Road 142 between 000Cjr z Victoria Street and Robinson o Street) are all County roads and their drainage is interdependent 7A- with the drainage on local streets. Figure 3: Port Burwell Storm Network (1981) Three main outlets exist. The area north of Wellington Street drains into Big Otter Creek below Bridge Street, outlet number 1 on Figure 4. The central portion of the village discharges to the beach, near the washroom facilities at the southern limit of Erieus Street and Hagerman Street (outlet number 2 below). Outlet number 3 drains the commercial area on Robinson Street. Smaller diameter outlets numbered 5 and 6 have minor catchment areas. The area west of Big Otter Creek drains out outlet number 4, then through ravines within the Provincial Park, and finally towards Big Otter Creek. The 2015 assessment found that a large portion of the sewers across the village are in disrepair with cracks, collapsed sections, or blockages. It also found that many sewers were less than 300mm in diameter, and that structures were connected to the sewers with "blind connections", making maintenance and inspections difficult. Figure 4 shows what was found in the investigation to prepare the Storm Sewer Assessment; green lines represent F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 9 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study the sewers that were videoed. County Roads were not inspected at that time and for the Master Drainage Study reference has been made to the drawings provided by Elgin County. Legend r` f Cutlet Location Outlet number COWPER Sr r y saun vsr P fJ 1 t; r rr- a TFI — WATERLOO ST 1 - 1111E11 IT 11R11H411 ST 5chool L HMC5 0111 - �� - Prrr sr �r' - f] Figure 4: Storm Sewer System Existing Condition Storm System Parameters The system was analysed using the rational method for both the 2-year and 5-year design storms to determine the ability of the system to convey flows for each of the design alternatives, however due to the condition of the system it was determined early on that the flows do not currently get conveyed properly within the piped system and therefore are most likely to flow overland to the lake. A MOE Certificate of Approval (1-783-82-837) was issued in 1983 for some of the storm sewers in Port Burwell (see Appendix B). F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 10 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Proposed Alternatives The following sections describe the alternatives that were considered under the Municipal Class EA process to address the problem statement as identified in the previous chapter. The alternatives may be applied in part or in whole for the village of Port Burwell. Alternative # 1: Do Nothing This option is to leave the existing system in its current condition; with portions that are clogged or broken and do not convey flows, with portions of the system that appear to not have an outlet, and with sewers located on private property. Although the Do Nothing option does not have an initial associated cost, maintaining the system is not possible and the risk to the Municipality for damage caused by flooding may cost the Municipality in the future. Alternative # 2: Repair the Existing System This alternative involves designing a system that is within the same alignment, location, and size as the existing system. The sewer capacity would not be increased to carry larger storm flows, sewers remain within private property, and easements could be requested. All outlets would remain in this option, including the outlet to the beach at the end of Robinson Street in its current condition, but the pipe outlet could be replaced. There would be minimal work on outlets to Big Otter Creek. Minimal work or no work would be proposed in areas where road-side ditches can convey the flows to an outlet (such as the Addison Street area). The rural cross-section would be maintained throughout the village. Legend � i ' �Q,.A1et 4o[anrrn SCUM€i sT �` 'i. .•erro.00 sl � .la�l 3 .msr a t" G o BarxK S � 1 a Figure 5: Repair the Existing System F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 11 MERIT ECM Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Alternative #3: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using the Existing Outlet Locations Designing a system for Port Burwell that conveys storm flows in accordance with Ministry of the Environment standards using the outlets in the existing location is proposed as Alternative #3. This includes increased pipe sizes throughout the village, with sewers sized to convey a 2-year or 5-year storm event (local versus collector). Utilizing road-side ditches on local streets to convey flows up to the 5-year storm when combined with the sewers would be considered. The outlets to Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie would be increased in size to convey the design flows. The outlet to Big Otter Creek south of the HMCS Ojibwa would remain, as would the small outlet out the bank south of Pitt and Elizabeth Streets. The outlet to the beach at the end of Robinson Street remains (optional). The "ditch" through the village remains, but sewers would be re-routed around private property. end aCute Loc b- 1- DmInage Dmir,Je. ioanoasr ..� � CD '� n �` 3 i(D Figure 6: Replace System, Same Outlet Locations F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 12 MERI )ECH Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Alternative #4: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, with Fewer Outlet Locations This option involves sizing a storm sewer network for the future needs of the municipality. The system in Port Burwell would convey storm flows in accordance with Ministry of the Environment standards using outlets in their existing locations. Increased pipe sizes throughout the village would be required to convey a 5-year storm event. The sewer system would be removed from private property and relocated to the municipal right of way. The drainage directed to the open ditch would be relocated as much as possible to the right of way. The drainage pattern is revised to suit the overall design of the village. The outlets to Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie would be increased in size to convey the design flows, but would be in the same location. The outlet to the south of the HMCS Ojibwa would be removed as would the small outlet into the slope along Pitt Street and the outlet to the beach at the end of Robinson Street. Legend Outlet Location _ a s Drainage Divide 1 Catchment and comm �.. i Outlet Number J. p � -suenEr sr / _ ■ _ _ 1 j wuiuni sr -'auawtu sr � � � � �� wa�wtw�sr w-xu� } rre l � IMc_Qpb— G - — — _ — A *'Mus4um a ■ O Figure 7: Replace System, Fewer Outlet Locations F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 13 MERIT ECM Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Evaluation of Alternatives Evaluation of the Alternatives was carried out to determine the recommended approach to satisfying the problem statement. Information received from agencies, residents, and stakeholders was used in this evaluation. Table 2 describes the evaluation criteria applied to each alternative. Criteria Description Conveyance Capacity • Storm event that can be conveyed in piped system • Outlet's ability to handle piped flow • Opportunity for development/intensification/growth • Overland flow route Completeness of System • Size of the area serviced with storm sewer • Connectivity of the network • Reduced flooding Physical Environment • Impact to Big Otter Creek (construction impact) • Impact to Lake Erie Beach (construction impact) • Water quality • Flood lain Social Environment • Location of sewer on private property (easement/acquisition) • Temporary construction impact (noise, dust, detours) • Built heritage • Archeological potential impact Financial . Impact on Capital Budget for construction • Operation and maintenance costs Table 2: Evaluation Criteria F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 14 MERIT ECH Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Evaluation Criteria Alternative #1 Alternative #2 Alternative #3 Alternative #4 Do Nothing Repair the System New System, Same New System, New Outlet Locations Outlets Conveyance Capacity Score; 1 2 5 5 Storm event that can be Storms cannot be conveyed Not sized to convey a Conveys 5-year storm in Conveys 5-year storm in conveyed in piped due to broken or clogged specific storm event, pipes. pipes. system lengths. replacing with the same size as existing. Conveys less than a 2 r storm event. Outlet's ability to handle Current outlets do not Outlet in good shape at the Outlets would be sized to Outlets would be sized to piped flow (diameter and receive much storm flow. beach, Big Otter Creek outlet accommodate new storm accommodate new storm slope) Robinson Street outlet is has pipes that have pulled parameters (some outlets parameters (some outlets crushed. Small diameter out of upstream pipe. to be resized). Robinson to be resized, others outlets to slope/beach hard Robinson Street outlet is not Street outlet is not desired. removed). Increase in size to find/maintain. desired. Small diameter Small diameter outlets to to outlet at beach. outlets to slope and beach slope and beach are hard to are hard to find and find and maintain. maintain. Opportunity for Additional flows from Additional flows from Additional flows from Additional flows from development, increased imperviousness increased imperviousness increased imperviousness increased imperviousness intensification, growth cannot be conveyed. cannot be conveyed. can be conveyed. Future can be conveyed. Future expansion of village not expansion of village not included (on site control included (on site control assumed). assumed). Overland flow route No change to overland flow No change to overland flow Opportunity exists to Opportunity exists to route. route. change the overland flow change the overland flow path, maintain road path, maintain road drainage within roadway drainage within roadway (curbs). (curbs). Completeness of System Score; 1 2 5 5 Size of the area serviced Limited useable storm Moderate portion of the All streets to be fitted with All streets to be fitted with with storm sewer sewer in central portion of village will have storm storm sewers, with outlets. storm sewers, with legal village. Addison Street is sewer. Addison Street Addison Street remains well outlets. Addison Street independent and appears to remains well serviced. serviced. remains well serviced. be well serviced. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 15 MERIT ECH Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Connectivity of the Very few connections are Storm sewer connections All streets to be connected All streets to be connected network functional. would be restored. Blind to an outlet. Blind to an outlet. Blind connections to remain as connections removed where connections removed where blind connections. possible. possible. Reduced flooding Existing flooding remains. Small storm events should Opportunity to reconstruct Opportunity to reconstruct remain in piped system roads with better drainage, roads with better drainage, better. Existing structures road drainage to stay within road drainage to stay within below road surface elevation road way, direct private road way, direct private would remain, and continue property's drainage to right property's drainage to right to flood when pipes are of way where possible. of way where possible. surcharged. Reduces flooding. Reduces flooding. Physical Environment Score; 5 5 3 3 Impact to Big Otter No construction. Repair to outlet necessary at Two outlets remaining, One new outlet into Big Creek (construction Big Otter Creek. Permit construction required to Otter Creek to be impact) from LPRCA required. increase diameters. Permit reconstructed for sizing. from LPRCA required. Permit from LPRCA required. Impact to Lake Erie No construction. No construction at outlets. Outlets at beach to be One new outlet to the Beach (construction reconstructed for sizing. beach to be reconstructed impact) for sizing. Water quality No change. No change. Outlet to Lake Erie beach Outlet to Lake Erie beach could incorporate could incorporate improvements with bio- improvements with bio- swales. swales. 100-year floodplain No impact, current inverts No impact, current inverts Increased diameter pipe, Increased diameter pipe, are below floodline. Outlets are below floodline. Outlets invert to creek and beach invert to creek and beach are not submerged. are not submerged. to match existing invert. to match existing invert. Outlets are not submerged. Outlets are not submerged. Social Environment Score; 2 3 4 5 Location of sewer on Storm sewer currently Storm sewer would continue Storm sewer would be Storm sewer would be private property crosses private residential to cross private residential relocated to the municipal relocated to municipal right (easement/acquisition) properties, and under the properties, and under the right of way. Outlet to Big of way, outlets to be within Museum. One outlet to Big Museum. One outlet to Big Otter Creek remains on municipal or county Otter Creek is believed to Otter Creek is believed to be private property, easement property. be through private through private property. could be requested. property. Easements to be requested. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 16 MERIT ECH Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Temporary construction No construction. Limited construction Construction disturbance Construction disturbance impact (noise, dust, disturbance. Disturbance to with road work limits. with road work limits. detours) commercial area. Impacts extend to beach Impacts extend to beach Construction on private and along commercial area. and along commercial area. property required. Construction on private Construction on private property required. property required. Built heritage Existing sewer under Existing sewer under Existing sewer under Existing sewer under museum remains. museum remains, repair museum is relocated and museum is relocated and may be necessary. properly abandoned in properly abandoned in lace. place. Archeological potential None. May require Heritage May require Heritage May require Heritage impact Assessment, consultation Assessment, consultation Assessment, consultation with Ministry of Culture with Ministry of Culture with Ministry of Culture required prior to required prior to required prior to implementation. implementation. implementation. Financial Score; 5 4 2 1 Impact on Capital Budget None. Lowest cost. High cost compared to High cost compared to for construction Alternatives 1 & 2. Alternatives 1 & 2. Operation and Staff time to respond to Staff time to respond to System should be able to System should be able to maintenance costs requests/complaints about complaints about continued last more than 50-years last more than 50-yearswith drainage problems. flooding. with new construction. new construction. Flooding Continual costs for Flooding complaints should complaints should be temporary"fixes". be eliminated. eliminated. Maintenance cost less due to fewer outlets. Total Score 14 16 19 19 Recommended Not recommended, does Not recommended, does not Not recommended, only Recommended, Solution not satisfy problem satisfy problem statement. partially satisfies the addresses the problem statement. problem statement statement 1 = most negative, 3 = moderate, 5 = most positive Table 3: Evaluation of Alternatives F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 17 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Summary of the Evaluation The following section describes the outcomes of the analysis for each alternative and how it satisfies the problem statement to provide an appropriate drainage system for current and future conditions in Port Burwell. Alternative #1: Do Nothing This alternative does not satisfy the problem statement and is not recommended. However, the area of Addison Street, from (and including) Homer Street to Libbye Street is predominately comprised of low impervious lots, and the sewer along Addison Street is in good repair, so it is recommended that the Do Nothing alternative is used in this area. Cleanout and maintenance of the existing system is recommended and should be incorporated into the Implementation Plan. Actions Necessary for Implementation • Cleaning program for all existing catchbasins Alternative #2: Repair the Existing System The storm sewer network is repaired in this alternative, simply by replacing sewers known to, or assumed to, exist. This would correct the plugged, collapsed, and broken pipes. It does not address items such as inlets on private property that experience flooding. Existing drainage in some areas is overland through private property, and this would not be changed, nor would any existing pipes located on private property be modified. Through the design and construction of this work, easements could be requested by the Municipality for the infrastructure on private lands, but they are not guaranteed to be granted. The outlet at the end of Robinson Street would be repaired; maintaining this outlet is not desired by the Municipality in conjunction with the East Beach Design project currently underway. This alternative is not recommended even though the cost is moderate, as the potential risk is high and the benefits are less than the other alternatives. Actions Necessary for Implementation • Ministry of the Environment and Climate Control Approvals for construction • Permit from Long Point Region Conservation Authority for repair to outlets • Consultation with Ministry of Culture on potential Archeological Study requirements • Construction drawings, tender and construction • Acquisition of easements Alternative #3: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using Existing Outlet Locations This option redesigns the storm sewer system such that it is upgraded to current standard with regards to sizing, and allows for intensification within the village by applying a higher percent impervious in the analysis. The outlets are proposed to remain in their current location, and they all would still convey flows. This alternative removes overland flow and pipes from private properties, with the exception of outlets. With the East Beach Design project currently underway by the Municipality, the outlet to the beach at the end of F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 18 MERITE0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Robinson Street is undesirable. There still remains an outlet to Big Otter Creek that is believed to be through private property. The amount of work and cost for the design and construction of the alternative is comparable to Alternative 4 and it has the ability to properly service the village. However if there is no ability to get easements for any outlets and land acquisition is required, the process is more difficult and may not result in the needed outlet being secured. This is the reason that this alternative is not recommended. Actions Necessary for Implementation • Ministry of the Environment and Climate Control Approvals for construction • Permit from Long Point Region Conservation Authority for repair/replacement of outlets • Consultation with Ministry of Culture on potential Archeological Study requirements • Construction drawings, tender and construction • Acquisition of easements Alternative #4: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using New Outlet Locations Similar to Alternative #3, this option would redesign the village's system to current standards accounting for higher levels of impervious cover, and allowing for intensification. All sewers would outlet to two existing locations, one to Big Otter Creek at Bridge Street and the other to the beach at the extension of Erieus Street (near the new washroom facilities). The outlets will need to be designed and a permit issued from Long Point Region Conservation Authority. This option removes all infrastructure from private properties. The new storm system to the newly-sized outlets provides the Municipality with the most reliable and appropriate storm sewer system for current and future conditions. New infrastructure should be seen as an investment, reducing maintenance costs in the long term. This is why Alternative #4 is the recommended alternative. Actions Necessary for Implementation • Ministry of the Environment and Climate Control Approvals for construction • Permit from Long Point Region Conservation Authority for change to outlets • Consultation with Ministry of Culture on potential Archeological Study requirements • Construction drawings, tender and construction Preferred Alternative As with any project, there isn't necessarily a single answer for all the areas or problems within a municipality. Even though the recommended alternative is #4, with a new storm sewer system designed with new outlets, there are specific areas to be addressed within this alternative. Design Considerations The following sections describe what needs to be included in the design of the system and the Implementation Plan. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 19 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Flooding of Private Property It is known that there are many properties within the village with front yards lower than the street. The detailed design of the system should review this situation and incorporate solutions such as lowering the road, providing positive drainage, or installing catchbasins that are above the hydraulic grade line of the sewers in a 5-year event. By sizing the sewers to convey a 5-year storm, the amount of flooding on private property should be reduced. Additionally, the re-routing of sewers to be fully within the streets instead of discharging to overland flow routes crossing private properties will reduce the volume and regularity of overland flows across private property between disjointed portions of the sewer network. Priority of Work The previous work prepared by Meritech Engineering discussing Priorities was prepared in isolation of information on County Roads. Since this information has now been provided and reviewed, the Priorities need to be revised and applied to the Preferred Alternative. This has been done as part of the Implementation Plan. The methodology of applying the priorities is still valid, with priority being assigned to outlets, sewers that service a large area, and the existing conditions within each catchment area. Drainage Three distinct drainage catchments exist in the preferred alternative, each with their own outlet. The recommended outlet locations utilize existing outlets, with sizing based on the upstream catchments. Big Otter Creek is the receiver of drainage from the catchment that is roughly north of Wellington Street. Robinson Street and Waterloo Street contain the collector and trunk sewers, and the outlet to the creek is just south of Bridge Street. The southern catchment discharges to the Lake Erie Beach, at the terminus of Hagerman Street (beach parking and washrooms). The largest sewers are on Wellington Street, Erieus Street, and Brock Street; the sewers pass through the park between Brock Street and the lake as in the existing condition. Appendix C includes drawings showing the drainage catchments and preliminary sewer sizes for the north and south catchments, which are also shown on the sewer sizing sheets also included in Appendix C. The third catchment is the part of the village on the west side of the creek. The area of Addison Street, from (and including) Homer Street to Libbye Street, is predominately comprised of low impervious lots, and the sewer and ditch system along Addison Street is in good repair, so it is recommended that the Do Nothing alternative is used in this area. Following completion of the replacement of sewers on the east side of the creek, and dependent on funding, homeowner reports of flooding or failures, and observations made during the catchbasin cleanout program, the Municipality could consider replacing the sewers in this catchment. It is expected that the sewers would be sized to convey the 5- year flows, as with the sewers on the main part of the village. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 20 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study East Beach Design Project As part of this project, it is proposed to construct a parking facility and a boardwalk at the end of Robinson Street. This is a very desirable project for the village. The secondary desire is to enhance this area by removing the watercourse that currently exists from the sewer outlet to the water. The detailed design for the storm sewer should incorporate minimizing the flows directed to this outlet, so that it can be removed and replaced with a bio-swale or bio-retention garden that would accept minimal overland road drainage. Catchbasin Cleanout Program Though identified only as recommended for the Addison Street area, it is recommended that as part of the Implementation Plan, that cleanout of structures be undertaken for project areas that will not be immediately constructed. A maintenance program should be instigated through the Capital Budget for catchbasin cleaning, every year in perpetuity for all structures in the Municipality to ensure functionality of the system is optomized. Design Parameters Description of the storm parameters, runoff coefficients, minimum pipe slopes and diameters, as well as recommendations to road cross-sections are made in the Implementation Plan to describe the assumptions made through the analysis; these should be applied to the work programs to each project. Elgin County uses the MTO Drainage Manual for the design of their storm sewer systems, with a common practice of sizing for a 5-year storm and increasing one pipe diameter for contingency as necessary (Director of Engineering, Elgin County 2016). Where directed by the County, this concept can be implemented into each of the detailed design projects. It is recommended that consultation with the County take place early in the projects to ensure an understanding of the scope of work within the County Roads. Implementation Due to the scope of the project, implementation of the alternative into detailed design and construction will take time. It cannot all be reconstructed in a single year. It is therefore necessary to prioritize projects such that they are done in a logical order. As projects are prioritized, capital budgets will be approved and as external funding is provided projects will be designed and constructed. This section describes the prioritizing of the projects as well as the parameters to be included in the designs. The analysis of staging and prioritizing the sewers did not differentiate between sewers in Bayham streets versus sewers in Elgin County roads. This allowed the system to be reviewed as a whole, it is recognized that for the detailed design of each stage coordination with the County will be necessary and it is recommended that the consultant and staff request that the County be involved and incorporate the necessary works in their right of ways and construction programs. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 21 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Priorities As with the Storm Sewer Costs Assessment Report(Meritech 2015), priorities were assigned to lengths of sewer typically corresponding to a street between two cross-streets. The priority of a section is based on two numerical factors: Category This can be described as the importance that the section of pipe plays in the overall network. Outlets are the most important section, with the least important being the first legs of sewers at the high points of drainage divides. Three categories were assigned: the first legs of sewers called "local" sewers; 'collector" sewers which are created when two local sewers combine; and a 'trunk" that is created when two collector sewers combine. Local, collector, and trunk sewer sections were assigned scores of 1, 2, and 3. These scores indirectly measure the size of the catchment area each section services. Thus the larger the area draining to a pipe the higher the score. Existing Condition This is described as the significance of structural damage and/or blockages, as determined by the CCTV inspection performed as part of the previous work, or (when this information is not existent or when there are no sewers on a certain street the possible effects of not having storm sewers present). For example, in downtown areas it is important that storm sewers exist in order to avoid nuisance ponding, flooding of businesses, etc. One of four conditions was assigned to each section: great, good, fair, and collapsed/plugged. These correspond to scores of 1 through 4. Sections of existing sewer that were not video inspected in 2015, primarily on County roads, were assigned "fair" as the County has indicated most of the sewers on County roads are steel pipe, which is likely to be experiencing significant deterioration due to its age. The category score was added to the existing condition score for each section; the sections with largest numbers represent the greatest priority. For example, a pipe segment with a small catchment that services only a few houses, doesn't have many pipes connecting into it, and is in fair condition does not need to be replaced immediately. However, the pipe leading to the outlet, with a large number of pipes feeding into it and servicing a large catchment area, is ranked high on the priority. It is also worthy of note that the pipes that service the largest areas are of higher costs. The sewer classifications are in Figure 8 and the existing conditions are in Figure 9. The tables in Appendix D show the pipe segments as they were analysed, with their representative scores. From this analysis the priorities are determined, as shown on Figure 10. Three sections of sewer were ranked lower than an upstream section. These were manually assigned a high priority, as work necessarily will progress from the outlets heading upstream. Table 4 shows the breakdown of sections by priority. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 22 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Priority Number of Sections Total Length Cost Estimate Priority 1 (High) 11 1564 $ 3,090,000 Priority 2 (Medium) 13 1973 $ 3,470,000 Priori 3 Low 16 2205 $ 3 520 000 Priori 4 Lowest 15 1241 $ 1,970,000 Totals 55 6884 $ 12,060,000 Table 4: Cost Estimates by Priority Cost Estimate Assumptions For the purposes of estimating an average cost per metre price for storm sewer replacement and road reconstruction, the following assumptions have been made: • New 1.5m wide sidewalk, both sides of the road • New curb and gutter (unless the right of way is less than 18m wide) • Sub-drain along the full length of road, under both curbs • Re-use Granular B road sub-base material • Imported Granular A road base • Re-pave the entire width of road with a 9.Om asphalt width (base pavement only) • No costs for watermain or sanitary • Existing asphalt in boulevards to be replaced with the same Estimates of 15% contingency, 15% for engineering were added to the estimates, HST was not included. For budgetary purposes, average costs of $1,600/m, $1,900/m, and $2,200/m were used for the local, collector, and trunk sewers (these include contingency and engineering). The exact cost for each section of road will depend on details that will be determined at the detailed design stage for each road, such as the amount of restoration work necessary in the boulevards, the number of structures required due to low points and intersections, exact sewer sizes, and local market rates. Sections not included Several sections of road are not included in the costing since there is no storm sewer (currently) proposed, including sections such as: • Pitt Street east of Victoria Street (no storm sewer) • Robinson Street from approx. 70m south of Pitt to the public beach • Lake Shore Line over 100m east of Elizabeth Street (the extent and outlet of the existing drainage system is unclear) • The intersection of Robinson Street and Victoria Street (and further north) During the detailed design stage for each stage, the exact limit of each stage will be confirmed with the Municipality and County, as required, and the budget estimate for each stage will be adjusted to reflect. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 23 hUR<fYST Robinson Erieus s° Strachan 0 L � Ic� D / Shakespeare Y o Milton o BODSWORTH LN Victoria IT Elizabeth GRACE CREST Z L h I- M M n o 0 o n - 0 % 0 [DRAWN :NGction Classificationsrt Burwell MERIT ECH engineering CHECKED BY: CHT SCALE: 1:4000 1315 Bishop Street North,Suite 202 Cambridge T 519.623.1140 F 519.623.7334 www.meritech.ca .COncept2 DATE: Jul 27, 2016 Figure 8 hUR<fYST Y 1 L Robinson Erieus 00 0 o pill is, 0 Strachan -T c� cQ 0 Shakespeare r i I i r m m o 0 BooSWORTH LN Milton Victoria 3 r--- Elizabeth GRACE CREST n Z 7� sCID � 0 M z 7rl - o 0 Q Q � 0 DRAWING: Existing Conditions Port Burwell MERIT ECH engineering DRAWN BY: JEL CHECKED BY: CHT SCALE: 1:4000 1315 Bishop Street North,Suite 202 Cambridge T 519.623.1140 F 519.623.7334 www.meritech.ca FILE NAME: 4423.COnCept2 DATE: Jul 27, 2016 Figure 9 hUR«YST V Robinson T Tfl Erieus ` 0 q OStrachan m � I Shakespeare 0 0 Milton BODSWORTH LN Victoria 3 GRACE CREST n Z L � r ,ate G) M z 0 0 _ U) 9 r-4. 0 FDRAWNBY: Priorities Port Burwell MERIT_: ECHengineeringJEL CHECKED BY: CHT SCALE: 1:4000 1315 Bishop Street North,Suite 202 Cambridge T 519.623.1140 F 519.623.7334 www.meritech.ca FILE NAME: 4423.COnCept2 DATE: Jul 27, 2016 Figure 10 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Determining Stage Limits Included in Appendix E are the priority rankings of each of the sections of road/sewer in Port Burwell. There are two straightforward ways to group these sections of road into stages: 1. By priority 2. By"neighbourhood"or area of the village Both options have advantages and disadvantages, as listed below in Table 5. Advantages Disadvantages By priority Highest priority sections get Highest priorities are generally reconstructed first. the highest cost; thus, the annual costs would be highest Outlets are reconstructed first. at the beginning. Especially for medium priority sections: sections with the same priority are spread out over the village, resulting in a fragment d work program. By neighbourhood Least disruption to residents: work Difficult to determine where would commence and be complete the limits of each in one year in any given area. neighbourhood should be Combination of small and large Need to determine an average sewers and fewer"connect to priority score, to determine existing" locations results in lower which neighbourhood gets costs. worked on first Larger work areas allow the May not replace all of the contractor suitable highest priority sections at the stockpiling/storage areas. very beginning. Reduced restoration costs. Table 5: Stage Creation Methodology Comparison A hybrid solution that takes the advantages from both of these methods and seeks to minimize the disadvantages is proposed. Shown in Table 6 and Figure 11 are the proposed five stages of reconstruction. Stages 1 and 3 include all of the high priority sections; stages 2, 4, and 5 are mainly lower priority. The dividing line between Stages 1 and 3 on Robinson Street is at Pitt Street, allowing for access to the downtown core and the HMCS Ojibwa submarine site during both stages. Similarly, the Port Burwell Public School is at the intersection of several stages, ensuring that there will be adequate access points throughout the entire construction plan. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 27 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study The tables in Appendix E show the stages, their average priority, and the associated rough cost estimates. These estimates are based on the information available at the time this report was prepared, and without the benefit of detailed design. Stage 3 (the outlet to the northern system) could be moved ahead to follow Stage 1 immediately. Several considerations that may influence this decision would be the impact to downtown businesses by having back-to-back summers of construction, availability of funding, and timing of Stage 1 (potentially over multiple years). Stage Total Length Average Priority Cost Estimate Score Stage 1 2018 1,385 5.1 $ 2,460,000 Stage 2 (2019-2020) 1,660 4•2 $ 2,800,000 Stage 3 (2021) 1,694 4.8 $ 3,040,000 Stage 4 2022-2023 1,210 4.1 $ 2,060,000 Stage 5 (2024-2025) 1,034 4.1 $ 1,700,000 Totals 6,983 $ 12,060,000 Table 6: Cost Estimates by Stage Design Objectives The design objectives for future work are to: 1. Mitigate flooding on private property 2. Design all sewers to convey the 5-year storm event 3. Construct roads with curb and gutter to effectively convey surface flows 4. Reconstruct storm sewer and surface works only; no reconstruction of sanitary or watermain is expected Design Criteria These design criteria are intended to guide future work in Port Burwell, and could be expanded upon by the Municipality in the future. They are the assumptions made during the Master Drainage Study process to prepare the conceptual drainage plans, sewer sizes and catchments discussed in the preferred alternative. They should be used in the detailed design stages. General 1. The storm sewer design shall be completed in accordance with the latest version of the Ministry of the Environment's Design Guidelines for Sewage Works(currently 2008 version) or the design standards listed below. 2. OPSS and OPSD should be utilized for construction. 3. Foundation drainage should be directed to the storm sewer system through the use of sump pumps, whenever possible. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 28 M�R<evSr Q (V L Robinson /—T c:) w w Erieus rt, Qj ((DD a �06'. s0 0 -� / N Strachan cn C Q, La Qj0 Shakespeare cD (D ,a N z N CD C v N 0 0 J�' BODSWORTH LN • , W M i Ito n Victoria Elizabeth (D cn GRACE CREST -Ffl Z r m G) M Z M. [DRAWN WING: Staging Plan Port Burwell MERI - ECH engineering BY: JEL CHECKED BY: CHT SCALE: 1:4000 1315 Bishop Street North,Suite 202 Cambridge T 519.623.1140 F 519.623.7334 www.meritech.ca E NAME: 4423.COncept2 DATE: Jul 27,2016 Figure 11 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Roads 1. All streets with a right of way width greater than or equal to 18m should have OPSD 600.100, Concrete Mountable Curb with Narrow Gutter along both sides of the street. 2. The minimum driving width (edge of pavement to edge of pavement) should be 9.0m. 3. Wherever feasible, front yards and the boulevards are to drain towards the street. 4. 100mm diameter sub-drain is to be provided under the curb Sewers 1. Sewers to be designed using the Rational Method (Q=A x I x C) to 90% of capacity. All sewers are to be designed for the 5-year storm event. a. The Municipality of Bayham will maintain a design spreadsheet that will be used to confirm the ability to convey flows as proposed by development, redevelopment, building permit applications where connections to the storm sewer system are provided or the percent impervious is increased from the existing condition 2. A time of concentration(Tc) of 10 minutes should be used for the first leg of sewers, as per MOE guidelines. 3. Double catchbasins and double catchbasin manholes are to be provided at all low points. 4. Minimum storm sewer size to be 300mm diameter, except for single catchbasin leads which can be 200mm diameter, and double catchbasin leads which can be 250mm diameter. 5. Roughness coefficient'n'to be 0.013 for PVC and concrete sewer, and 0.024 for CSP 6. Pipes installed with less than 1.2m cover between finished grade and crown of pipe shall be insulated as per OBC Volume 2 section A-7.3.5.1.(1) using 2" rigid insulation. 7. Minimum slope is 0.5% or full flow velocity of 0.6m/s, whichever is greater. 8. Maximum velocity is 6m/s (actual or with full flow). 9. Blind connections are not allowed unless approved by Public Works. 10. Maximum size for flexible pipe (PVC, HDPE) is 600mm. Runoff coefficients: Residential Single family 0.40 - 0.45 Semi-detached 0.45 - 0.60 Townhouses 0.50 - 0.70 Apartments 0.60 - 0.75 Institutional 0.40 - 0.75 Commercial 0.75 - 0.85 Industrial 0.65 - 0.75 Open Space 0.25 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 30 MERIT E0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Design storm parameters: a b c 2-year 747.96 7.467 0.8048 5-year 1007.05 7.382 0.8040 10- ear 1181.90 7.382 0.8041 100-year 1660.60 6.875 0.7978 Frames and Grates/Covers 1. Standard frame and grate for Catchbasins and Catchbasin Manholes is OPSD 400.030 "Square V Grate with Herring Bone Openings". 2. Manhole covers to be as per OPSD 401.010, "closed"for sanitary and 'open"for storm. Catchbasins 1. 600mm deep sump. 2. Maximum spacing between manholes to be 90m (0%-4% road gradient), or 60m (over 4% road gradient). Manholes 1. Manholes shall be located at the end of each run and at all changes in direction, slope, and size. 2. Manhole sizing as per manufacturer's specifications; OPSD 701.021 used as a guide during design. Minimum size to be 1200mm diameter. 3. Catchbasins and catchbasin manholes should have a 600mm deep sump, other structures are to be benched. 4. Maximum spacing between structures is 120m (sewers 375mm diameter and less) or 150m (larger), unless catchbasin manholes, then the catchbasin spacing applies. 5. Unless pipe diameters change, drops through manholes should be 0.03m for 01 through 450 changes in flow direction, and 0.06m for changes between 460 and 900. Flows should not turn more than 901. Sewers larger than 1200mm diameter should not turn more than 450 a. When the pipe diameter increases through a manhole, the obvert of the incoming smaller pipe should not be lower than the obvert of the outgoing pipe. 6. When the difference in inverts between an incoming and outgoing pipe exceeds 0.60m, a drop structure is required. Pre-cast external drop structures are preferred, but internal structures can be used on existing structures. R\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 31 MERITE0H Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Outlets 1. Pre-cast concrete headwalls shall be used as per OPSD 804.030 and 804.040. 2. Grates as per OPSD 804.050. 3. A handrail as per OPSD 980.101 shall be installed around headwalls exceeding a height of 0.6m. Service Connections 1. Min. 100mm services, at 1% minimum slope (2%-8% preferred). Risers should be used to avoid steeper services and/or when the sewer is greater than 4m deep 2. Service connections to the main sewer should be made using factory-made tees or wyes, or strap-on-saddles. Tees or wyes should be used wherever the diameter of the sewer main is less than 450mm or less than twice the diameter of the service connection. F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx August 2016 Page 32 Appendix A; Public Consultation MERIT) ERIT ECH F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx MERIT' E0H Meeting Minutes Meeting #1 Date: January 29, 2016 Time: 2:30pm Location: Elgin County Building, St. Thomas Re: Class EA for Port Burwell Project Kick-off Attendance: Clayton Watters, Elgin County Peter Dutchak, Elgin County Paul Shipway, Municipality of Bayham Chris Togeretz, Meritech Amanda Froese, Meritech Item Discussion Item Action 1.0 Notice of Study, EA Process -advertise in papers, website. Send to Paul. MER -contact school for use policy MER 1.1 Agencies to circulate -No additions to list Info -No circulation to First Nations necessary Info -Meritech to meet with Conservation Authority MER 1.2 County involvement -County needs assessment done on their infrastructure, prepare MER quotation to inspect and determine size, invert and location. No CCTV. -County roads to work with drainage system as determined in MER preferred alternative. Analysis entire town as a single system. -Size County Roads for 5-year, go up one size for contingency MER -Sensitivity analysis for small streets, 2-year or 5-year events MER 1.3 Storm sewer network and how the County Roads interrelate -Unknown at this time, MTO 1950 drawings to be sent to Meritech COUNTY -Send County sizing information MER 1.4 Timing for County works in Port Burwell -MRI on Port Burwell in 2019, was for resurfacing but will incorporate Info elements necessary for storm sewer, including curb and gutter replacement if necessary 1.5 Finance and Cost Sharing -County to contribute to their size needed if sewers are in poor All condition for their drainage, oversizing to be paid by Bayham. -County has included budget for asphalt, etc. Cost estimate and All MEV2014 K:\Projects\4423\00-Admin\PM\Bayham EA Meeting Minutes.docx January 29,2016 Page 2 MERIT' E0H discussion to follow for costs above storm sewer works. -Longterm planning from general levy (Bayham) and grant programs Info -Both Bayham and County to apply together for funding when All appropriate (Province and Federal Government) Agenda prepared by: MERITECH ENGINEERING MEV2014 K:\Projects\4423\00-Admin\PM\Bayham EA Meeting Minutes.docx January 29,2016 Page 3 Notice issued: February 22, 2016 PORT BURWELL MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE OF STUDY COMMENCEMENT The study The Municipality of Bayham has initiated the development of a master drainage study for Port Burwell to lay out a long-term strategy for the repair and replacement of the storm sewer network. The master drainage study will be carried out by Meritech Engineering, who have recently identified that the storm sewer system throughout Port Burwell is deficient and does not currently serve the Municipality's or its residents' needs. The purposes of the study are to investigate alternatives for storm drainage in Port Burwell and produce a master drainage plan that will guide the Municipality to a future storm drainage network (pipes and outlets) that will be able to serve the Municipality's and residents' needs. The study will enable the Municipality of Bayham to identify opportunities to repair/replace the storm sewer network together with road repair and reconstruction projects. The study area includes most of Port Burwell. The study was authorized by cam, BI OTTER 19 PORT Bayham Council on 2 cAMGRouNCr8 BURELL December 17, 2015 and will COWP�/� follow the Master Plan @PATHFINLIERMAPS process described in the OJT Municipal Class Environmental Assessment T N N ® M (MCEA) manual, October "EWfo LU 2000, as amended 2007 & ,A'RI�ALA BURWELL 6 J �� 2011. The study is being r TE oo27 � N undertaken as a Schedule C Q Y I L�BYE � project. o 0 � 142 W L!N ON w [77 We want to hear from 39 OM RACE you I�J T Public consultation is a key BROCK RIGHT part of this study. The P` ` AIY��" proposed consultation planRMAN �� C, .5 k , provides for public information centres at two points in the study: Spring 2016 — to review the problem statements; and early Fall 2016 — to review preliminary alternatives and examine the recommended design. In addition, there will be an opportunity to review the final Master Drainage Study report prior to completion. The first public information centre (PIC) date and details will be advertised and posted in the calendar at bayhem.on.ca. Meeting notices will also be circulated to neighbourhood residents. Study contacts All those with an interest in the study are urged to attend. If you have any questions or wish to be added to the study mailing list, please contact: Project Manager: Mr. Paul Shipway, CAO Consultant: Ms. Amanda Froese, P.Eng. FEC Municipality of Bayham Meritech Engineering 9344 Plank Road 1315 Bishop Street North, Suite 202 Straffordville, ON NOJ 1YO Cambridge, ON N1R 6Z2 (519) 866-5521 (519) 623-1140 pshipway@bayham.on.ca amandaf@meritech.ca PORT BURWELL MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE The study The Municipality of Bayham has initiated the devel- Tara , r/ PORT opment of a master drainage study for Port Burwell BURWELL to lay out a long term strategy for the repair and replacement of the storm sewer network.The mas- ter drainage study will be carried out by Meritech lop Engineering,who have recently identified that the storm sewer system throughout Port Burwell is e ,�z deficient and does not currently serve the Munici- pality's or its residents' needs. i acea- The purposes of the study are to investigate ' f ` t, i`- 1uGF:'�KNI alternatives for storm drainage in Port Burwell and produce a master drainage plan that will guide the Municipality to a future storm drainage network(pipes and outlets)that will be able to serve the Municipality's and residents' needs.The study will enable the Municipality of Bayham to identify opportunities to repair/replace the storm sewer network together with road repair and reconstruction projects.The study area includes most of Port Burwell. The study was authorized by Bayham Council on December 17,2015 and will follow the Master Plan process described in the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment(MCEA) manual,October 2000,as amended 2007&2011.The study is being undertaken as a Schedule C project. We want to hear from you Public consultation is a key part of this study.The proposed consultation plan provides for public infor- mation centres at two points in the study:Spring 2016—to review the problem statements; and early Fall 2016—to review preliminary alternatives and examine the recommended design.In addition,there will be an opportunity to review the final Master Drainage Study report prior to completion. The first public information centre(PIC)will be held on Date:Saturday June 18,2016 Time:1:00 to 3:00 pm Location:Port Burwell Public School,Gymnasium Study contacts All those with an interest in the study are urged to attend.If you have any questions or wish to be added to the study mailing list,please contact: Project Manager: Mr.Paul Shipway,CAD Consultant: Ms.Amanda Froese,P.Eng.FEC Municipality of Bayham Meritech Engineering 9344 Plank Road 1315 Bishop Street North,Suite 202 Straffordville,ON NOJ 1YO Cambridge,ON N1 R 6Z2 (519)866.5521 (519)623.1140 pshipway@bayham.on.ca amandaf@meritech.ca 8c • rr , -)K OX')(HAA engineering -Utunity Is io Welcome Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Class EA Schedule B Public InformationCentre • June 18 , 2016 Port Burwell • • • 11 • 11 • Port Burwell Master Drainage study Class EA { The Class EA Process has been initiated out of the results of a study of the existing storm sewer network Oa�'orr„ni� The goal is to propose an appropriate drainage system for the Village of Port Burwe//that satisfies the needs of the community and the Municipality. The current study has prepared alternatives to address drainage and deficiencies in the system, a guiding document will be prepared to guide the Municipality in future storm water works. Tonight will: To provide an opportunity for residents to add input into the study Please sign the registration sheet Please approach the design team to discuss concerns and personal experience Deficiencies are to being recorded by the design team, and your input is n appreciated. To provide an update to residents and Council as to existing conditions, and alternative solutions Please review the information boards Please provide comments on the alternatives through the comment sheets or contact the design team below: Contact information: Amanda Froese, P. Eng. Paul Shipway, CAO Meritech Engineering Municipality of Bayham 1315 Bishop St. N Suite 202 9344 Plank Road The study area includes the entire Village of Port Burwell. It will analyse all options within the scope of the Village and draining to the existing Cambridge ON, N1S 4S2 Straffordville,ON NOJ lY0 outlets. This includes sections of streets without storm sewers (519)623-1140 (519) 566-5521 currently. amandaf@meritech.ca pshipway@bayham.on.ca Pur • ose for • Information Center M E Fz ii E C H engineering Project Description & Class EA Process { aPortnnity Is"to Roadways are fitted with storm sewers that collect rain water and convey it to an appropriate outlet. Storm systems can be either in pipes, ditches or a combination. These sewers are design to carry an amount of rainwater that is recommended by the Ministry of the Environment. Port Burwell has 5 known outlets to Big Otter Creek or Lake Erie. The storm sewers in Port Burwell do not meet the recommended design criteria from the Ministry of the Environment. The storm sewers in many areas of Port Burwell are in poor condition and are in need of repair or replacement due to condition. The County of Oxford owns and maintains storm sewers within their roads. 0 The Municipality of Bayham has a number of options: • Alternative 1 : Do Nothing • Alternative 2: Repair the existing system with the same outlets, same size sewers • Alternative 3: Correct the system to meet current standards, same outlets Alternative 4: Correct the system to meet current standards with new outlets/removing outlets �. June2016 . • 0 Phase 2:Alternative Implementation •... Solutions ------------- Identify',Problem Identify alternative solutions'.' Notice of Completion to review Prepare 'designs for Public Notice of Project Inventory natural,social,economic Agencies and Public individual road Project Initiation Environment 30-day review period reconstruction projects Identify Impact of Alternative Solutions Master Drainage Report presented Proceed to construction Public Information Centre#1 to Council and Public. Select Preferred Alternative Today Oday Confirm Schedule B Class EA 16 MERI "I- ECH engineering ,prr,YHA ? Alternative o Nothing o�pQrt s'"(0 � eraity I !` fiend Leave the existing system in its current condition: �� -- _ _ i Outlet Location 1O"�ST �k I Chalet number With X00not rtions that are clogged or broken ,and convey flows ;°°"" `�`With portions of the system that appear not to have an outlet "'"'S` With sewers located on private property a � � , T?nNWN SY Although the Do Nothing option does NBWMNgT not have an initial associated cost, WArMLD0 Sf - maintaining the system is not possible - � ' -} and risk to the Municipality for damage WKS0 e sn°9i P [_ r _ caused by flooding may cost the a, Municipality in the future + - 'I` WSLOIGM' ► This option may be applied in part or in whole for the Village of Port Burwell. ,' `' 9ROCK ST Existing storm sewer system A MERIT EC engineering �,p,YHAA? Alternative #2 - Repair the Existing Sys Legend ► Prepare a system that is within the aOutlet Location same alignment, location, size as ' FHOMER ST replaced to be the existing system COWPER ST —Ex.Pipes to remain Outlet Nmrbe, Sewer capacity will not be increased to carry larger storm flows SIH Sewers remain within private property, I - easements may be requested TENNYSON ST Outlet to the beach at the end of - - ' e � � NEWIpN 5T Robinson Street remains ' I NIMWELL ST U WATERl.00 STHANNAH ST Minimal work on outlets to Big Otter - -� Creek _ AYE� scHooi � , All outlets remain _-- Minimal work or no work proposed in 4 a WE� N� ITT P ST g �i areas where road side ditches can convey the flows to an outlet (such as Addison Street) 3 BR�KST I Current "ditch' through village remains C� z Repaired - - system MEF2IT E C H engineering Alternative # -- Replace System with! the a rn e Outlets ApQrteraitylsY�4 Design a system for Port Burwell that conveys storm flows in accordance with Ministry of the Environment , �outWcLocAon Standards using the outlets in the r ,1` --- 6rainageD�de existing location. Increased pipe sizes throughout the village, with sewers sized to convey a 2 or5-year storm event � Road side ditches on local streets may convey flows up to the 5-year storm when '°�°"F` combined with the sewers Outlets to Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie will NXMILSr - W1 ' � .. be increased in size to convey designed • flows � - Outlet to the beach at the end of Robinson 4 Street remains (optional) "Ditch" through village remains, but sewer ' ® 4 re-routed around private property -� Minimal work proposed within Addison ` • Street areaNew Storm Sewer System A MEF2IT E C H engineering Alternative #4 - Replace stern with New Outlets -1-tun.ty Is--' Legend ► Design a system for Port Burwell that T_-- ,��. Outlet n conveys storm flows in accordance with Ministry of the Environment i.� Drainage Divide Standards using the outlets in the : � - _ Catchmenta,d sr i Outlet dumber existing location. cY� Increased pipe sizes throughout the village, to conveya 2 or 5-year storm event . Road side ditches on local streets may L4 � +*- r' 1 I ",u�N� Y conveyflows u to the 5-year storm when --- �- __ r-- p Y N� T combined with the sewers -4 I i Outlets to BigOtter Creek and Lake Erie will - - aRuOo be increased in size to convey designed r-I ff ; r �I shoo, —., ; flows / 'ir1l 1I -� I I HMCS +IbOa Outlet to the beach at the end of Robinson ' —7-.-.� -- 3 Z WSiSNGT N5T Street is removed z ' ` Minimal work proposed within Addison �mn � �- Mus�` � I Street area Excavation depths over 5m along Robinson New Storm Sewer System MERIT ECH engineering Evaluation of Alternatives oA0-t.ii ' Evaluation i • Nothing Repair Existing System Same Outlets New Outlets Conveyance Capacity 1 2 5 5 (Can it convey an appropriate storm event?) Completeness of System Serviced 1 2 5 5 (How much of the village is serviced?) Physical Environment- 5 5 3 3 Big Otter Creek, Lake Erie Beach (does construction impact) Social Environment (How does it 2 3 4 5 affect local residents, businesses, property and built heritage) Financial 5 4 2 1 (What level of immediate financial resources) 14 16 19 19 1 =negative, 3=moderate, 5=positive MERIT E C H engineering Considerations / Further Discussion ► Does Solution have to be the same for the entire ► What if the Municipality doesn't have the funds for village? the solution? NO. The proposed work plan will present work to be done in Addison Street area can be considered separate as it is well 201 71201 8, and will provide recommendations for future serviced with road side ditches, outlets to the ravine and protect scopes. Council will review this report annually with the Capital budget work to determine which projects storm inlets. Maintenance of this system is recommended; will be funded in each year. Priority was previously cleaning out structures, flushing pipes. identified for areas with known concerns. ► Small diameter outlet at the end of Robinson Street ► How will this affect landowners? is a nuisance to the beach, can it be eliminated? Construction will occur within the roadways, installation Yes. of new storm sewers, catchbasins and manholes will be done by contractors. Minimal grading may occur on By redirecting some flows north and removing sewers. yards, and residents will be able to view the plans prior to Rainwater flows from the street would remain overland to construction. Disturbance to residents can be minimized, a "bio-Swale" constructed along the edge of the road and by providing access nightly to driveways, and curb-side the parking lot, that will allow for cleaning of the water, garbage collection can be done by the contractor. and then it will infiltrate into the beach. Large storm events will flow over the bio-swale. Constructing this ► What is the perceived effect on the beach? system as an amenity feature to be protected is proposed. Increasing a storm outlet size will allow for larger storm events to drain out to the beach. The drainage area ► Are County Roads any different than local roads? increase will result in more water being directed through Yes. the pipes to the existing outlet, and pond area. It is not a o Approval from the County is required for work on their significant change. road s. Co-ordination with the County may affect timing, the County has plans for resurfacing of their roads and construction can be co-ordinated. Working with the County will also be done to apply for Provincial Grants. MEFZIT EC engineering �,p,YHAA? Preferred #4 O�'F''°i'teraity�`�oo� Replace System New utlet ► Increased pipe sizes throughout the village, Legend with County Road sized to convey a 5-year i OutletLocation storm, and local streets sized to convey a 2- _.. Drainage Divide year storm. + ~•� CatlIhmentand ► Sewers removed from private properties m"M� +.+° °ut'atNumber a ► Storm sewer under museum removed (to Big w :SO,,,;,EY� ;-..,• Otter Creek) �' ,.P ► Road side ditches on local streets may ,�„ „� convey flows up to the 5-year storm when combined with the sewers ► WUL Outlets Lake Erie will be increased in size to �R � convey designed flows Existing _- � ' i 4. Uesyc ST to be repaired r �+ � �''••.�'�. �i ► Outlet to the beach at the end of Robinson , 5W„ewa o�netur,dei 4�_ 7 r museum to be �u,,�, ST —" Street is removed, integrate with a bio-swale �� • and drainage from parking lot Existing sewers and swales to remain, n'tusdu n; Pr I J ► Minimal work proposed within Addison peed°rk g _ ' 1 ;; Street area �J�. ► Construction required through local streets to to be carried out over next 20 years �'' "' beabandon d z Nio- ale garden Enlarged Outlet to at"of Robinson beach New Storm Sewer System M E R I ECH engineering Next Steps ob�8tt S� v in.ry ► Review comments and suggestions from the public and circulated agencies ► Confirm the preferred alternative based on input Assess and propose work plan to meet preferred alternative ► Present Master Plan at Council Meeting September 1 5t" with final Master Plan Report for approval by Council ► The Municipality of Bayham will accept the report and use it to guide future works within the village ► Individual reconstruction projects will be designed in accordance with the recommendations of the report To provide comments : Amanda Froese, P. Eng. Paul Shipway, CAO Meritech Engineering Municipality of Bayham 1 31 5 Bishop St. N Suite 202 9344 Plank Road Cambridge ON, N IS 4S2 Straffordville, ON NOJ 1 YO (519) 623-1140 (519) 566-5521 amandaf@meritech.ca pshipway@bayham.on.ca MERIT ECH engineering - REPORT o� y CAO portunity Is�o TO: Mayor& Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAO DATE: June 16, 2016 REPORT: CAO-41/16 SUBJECT: EAST BEACH DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS BACKGROUND On April 7, 2016 the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham passed the following resolution: THAT Harbourfront Committee proposal re Port Burwell East Beach Landscape Improvement be received for information; AND THAT staff be directed to elevate and seed Part 'A' within the current confines of the drainage outlet; AND THAT staff be directed to bring back detailed design considerations and East Beach plan with public consultation plan for Council consideration. DISCUSSION As per the direction of Council landscape improvements were conducted in the month of April 2016, with the assistance of the Harbourfront Committee and a local soil donor. Staff worked with the Municipal Engineer, Spriets, to develop the East Beach Design Considerations, attached hereto as Appendix 'A'. The parameters utilized by staff and the Municipal Engineer when compiling the proposed detailed design drew upon previous community submitted considerations and the Port Burwell Waterfront Master Plan. A plan which determined that to create a vibrant and attractive waterfront, the following key principles should be followed during the design process, including: environmental preservation and conservation; safety and security; continuity and connectivity. These principles were balanced against financial realities, land ownership and integration of any design considerations into complementing project schedules. The Waterfront Master Planning project was an initiative undertaken by the Municipality of Bayham with the primary objective to identify strategic future public investments in services, facilities, access and parking that will contribute to the waterfront as a tourist and recreational area for local residents and visitors. Any works to be completed following consultation would be subject to a final survey of the lands, specifically the west side of the Robinson St. turnaround, and LPRCA approvals. PARKING: As noted within the Port Burwell Waterfront Master Plan the Municipally-owned parking lot on the east side of the Robinson St. turnaround provides parking for approximately 50-60 cars. The informal parking lot on the west side of the Robinson St. turnaround provides an additional 50-60 spots. It is the goal of the municipality to provide for approximately 150-200 parking spaces adjacent to the public beach in the future. The design proposes 150 spots (86 and 64 respectively) with room for 4 trailer parking spots. The design also proposes extension of the exterior parking post and rope system and parking islands to give structure to the parking area. The design also contemplates a fresh topping of gravel, with only the accessible parking spots being paved. ACCESSIBILITY&CONNECTIVITY The Municipality currently has a Capital Item for consideration to rebuild a larger accessible viewing platform. The design considerations attached hereto propose a larger accessible platform, with room for picnic tables and seating, along with a boardwalk connecting the East Pier to the parking lot and washrooms. The connectivity would greatly improve the accessibility of the Port Burwell East Beach. ENVIRONMENTAL&SUSTAINABILITY Building on the work of the Otter Valley Naturalists the design proposes to remove a number of trees, many of which have been vandalized and killed. The ability to integrate trees into the exterior parking delineation and parking islands would eventually provide shade in the future. Additionally once the area is established, partnerships with LPRCA and the Otter Valley Naturalists can be strengthened to provide environmental and sustainable education and information signage. As noted from the Waterfront Master Plan: In addition to the diversity of land types, one of the defining characteristics of the Port Burwell Waterfront is the vast amount of mown turf. While this provides important areas for recreation, there seems to be a greater amount than what is needed and the resulting consequence to sustainability and maintenance is considerable. The most successful wildlife habitats should include a range of ecosystems with extended transition zones. These "edge"conditions frequently house the richest diversity of species. Additionally, maintaining a continuous band or "greenway"is a good method of establishing healthy species diversity and stable populations. In many communities, municipalities have taken the innovative step of replacing some large areas of turf with wildflower meadows, as well as planting trees and establishing diverse shorelines. These measures may be more successful if they become part of a longer-term strategy of interconnected habitat that spans the length of the shoreline. This approach would also create a diversity of experience for beach visitors, tourist and local users. In consultation with the Otter Valley Naturalists, the community group has undertaken a number of these naturalization efforts including Tree Planting in Memorial Park and naturalization planting in the drainage swale within the beach. ROBINSON ST TURNAROUND A focal point of the community submissions to date has been the reconstruction of the Robinson St. turnaround. As the turnaround currently plays an important role in the Port Burwell Storm Sewer System staff respectfully recommend leaving the turnaround and integrating its reconstruction to current standards at the conclusion of the Port Burwell Storm Sewer Environmental Assessment. Possibly ready for grant application in 2017 and construction in 2018 if funding is approved. FUTURE INITIATIVES The proposed design considerations would also be a starting point for future initiatives including better connectivity to Memorial Park, downtown and the Otter Valley Utility Corridor Trail. CONSULTATION To obtain community input on the proposed design and possible alternatives and options staff would respectfully recommend Council to post an East Beach Consultation on the municipal website including Report CAO 41/16 and the Port Burwell Waterfront Master Plan. Notice of Consultation would be posted online, at the municipal office and libraries. Consultation would run June 17, 2016 - July 15, 2016 at noon (28 days — 19 business days), following which comments could be incorporated into a staff report to be presented at the July 21, 2016 meeting of Council. Following Council direction on July 21, 2016 staff could incorporate direction into the 2017 Budgets for Council consideration during budget deliberation. COSTING-FUNDING The costing of the project attached hereto is greater than the entire 2016 Capital Levy. To move forward with East Beach Improvements, once directed and approved by council, staff would propose the following options: 1) Conduct smaller line items (rope/posts, bury hydro service) towards year end if budget savings exist and with public works staff where possible. 2) Budget for components of the project in the 2017 and beyond budgets. 3) Make application to the Enabling Accessibility Fund for the Boardwalk/Accessible Viewing Platform component of the project— max. contribution $50,000. a. The Community Accessibility Stream is currently open and accepting applications until July 26, 2016. To be considered eligible for funding, projects must be directly related to removing barriers and increasing accessibility for people with disabilities in Canadian communities. i. Should Council support this specific component of the design staff would respectfully recommend Council direction to commence completing the application for the Boardwalk/Accessible Viewing Platform. 4) Make application to the Ontario Trillium Fund or its successor Capital Grant Program when available. a. Due to Ontario Trillium Fund (OTF) budget changes and the upcoming launch of a new $25 million community capital program that OTF will administer on behalf of the government of Ontario, OTF are suspending the investment stream for capital grants. OTF will release a new deadline at a later date when details of the new community capital program are finalized. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-41/16 re East Beach Design Considerations be received for information; 2. AND THAT Council direct staff to post an East Beach Consultation as contemplated within Report CAO 41/16 and report back to Council July 21, 2016; 3. AND THAT Council direct staff to make application to the Enabling Accessibility Fund for the Boardwalk/Accessible Viewing Platform as contemplated within Report CAO 41/16. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul Shipway CAO LAKE ERIE EX,BEACH AREA MA B�O2001ER EX.PIER 1� �� r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- ._ RIM$TRE EX.BEACH AREA s 0 0 0 0 EX, PIER 1_�11111J=CrC111J_ --- --�-- PROPOSED 3 In LJ 1J • ® 0 0 WIDE BOARDALK a- � PROPOSED EX.BE EX. E OBSERVATION TO BEDECK REMOVED REMOVED -. EX.TREE \ �� TO BE REMOVED KEY PLAN PROPOSED 3 m WIDE BOARDWALK EX.TREE TO BE _ REMOVED SCALE: NTS - - - EX.TREE I EX.WASHROOM — _ TO BE REMOVED FACILITY i I I EX.TREE TO BE REMOVED Gt EX.TREE J TO BE POST AND ROPE FENCE REMOVED O 8" POSTS- 8' O/G IEX. PAVEMENT NATURAL SAND '--,—EX.FENCE TO BE REMOVED EDGE OF PROP.PAWING EX.WASHROOM 15 O PROPOSED GRAVEL — F ACILITY TO PRO •DIVIp ISLAN TURN AROUND AREA BE REMOVED_ GRAVEL ERoEUS SynDEE ING LO I j ICJ 8s� EX. GRAVEL 2 OF PARKING LOT - PROPOSED EDGE ASPHALT ON NEW ROUNDABOUT O O O O BM NAIL IN HP 176.086 EX.HYDRO SERVICE S./. TO BE BURIED TRAILER PARKING TRAILER PAWING— — — — — — H.P. EX.GUARD RAIL — 31 s.i. . EDCsE OF PROP.PARKINCs — EX.CONC.BLOCKS TO BE REMOVED j H.P. PROPSED SIGN "PORT BURWELL" I O Q O PLAN SCALE: 1 : 250 PROPOSED CONCEPT PLANS JOB 216117 �� w - - - SPRIET ASSOCIATES PORT BUR BEAM IMPROVEMENTS architects - engineers PORT BURWELL EAST BEACH MAY 31 2016 A60 SPRIET ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS&ARCHITECTS 155 York Street London, Ontario N6A 1A8 Tel. (519)672-4100 Fax(519)433-9351 E-mail: mail@spriet.ca www.spriet.ca Port Burwell East Beach Improvements Municipality of Bayham 8-Jun-16 Item No. Description Estimated Cost 1 Construct concrete curbs and islands $ 1.9,000.00 2 Construct 3.Om ( 10' wide) boardwalk with landing on sono tube piers and 2x6" pressure treated decking $ 160,000.00 3 Supply and Install Rope Fence with posts at 2.4m on centre $ 7,500.00 4 Regrade parking areas with 200mm of Granular'A' $ 55,000.00 5 Supply and Install asphalt at entrances $ 15,000.00 6 Bury electrical service including disconnect $ 10,000.00 7 Tree planting ( 30 trees) $ 8,250.00 8 Supply and Install Port Burwell sign including foundations $ 67,000.00 9 Contigency Allowance $ 25,000.00 Total $ 366,750.00 Associates:A.M. SPRIET•J.R. SPRIET• K, McILMURRAY • M.P. DEVOS •J.M. SPRIET• C.S. LIERMAN •A.T.ALTENLIU OPEN HOUSE / INFORMATION CEN-1 RE Port Burwell Plaster Drainage Study Class EA Jane 18, lulb i:uu P.M. to 3:uu P.M. HA� �vrrul[lty 19 to Port Burwell Public School Gymnasium COMMENT SHEET u e f J .4, p i l r C Email -:� f r°_�.' Telephone No. E HaBre��: OPEN HOUSE / INFORMATION CENTRE Rinc 18, 2ulb 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. -,vwx'YHA) ��rtuniry Is�L Purt Burvveh Public: 5c:huul Gymnasium KEGiS rFM i 1UN SREE i Name (Please Print) Address Email/Telephone gay 2. !+f ilk r 0; -i e 2n r ZJw, 1" ( : .1 I dam' cr6 I \)u � 1 ?`1\ca (d. 3!V ri IVLA. - )V44 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Ministry of Tourism, Ministere du Tourisme, 1 1A Culture and Sport de la Culture et du Sport l Heritage Program Unit Unite des programmes patrimoine /•) 1r Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Onta ho 401 Bay Street,Suite 1700 401, rue Bay, Bureau 1700 Toronto ON WA OA7 Toronto ON WA OA7 Tel: 416 314 7145 Te1: 416 314 7145 Fax: 416 212 1802 Te1ec: 416 212 1802 April 5, 2016 (EMAIL ONLY) Amanda Froese, P.Eng Meritech Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North, Suite 202 Cambridge, ON N 1 R 6Z2 E: amandaf@meritech.ca RE: MTCS file#: 0004358 Proponent: Municipality of Bayham Subject: Notice of Commencement, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Port Burwell Master Drainage Study Location: Port Burwell, Municipality of Bayham, Elgin County, Ontario Dear Amanda Froese: Thank you for providing the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (MTCS)with the Notice of Commencement for your project. MTCS's interest in this EA project relates to its mandate of conserving Ontario's cultural heritage, which includes: Archaeological resources, including land-based and marine; Built heritage resources, including bridges and monuments; and, Cultural heritage landscapes. Under the EA process, the proponent is required to determine a project's potential impact on cultural heritage resources. Realizing that this is a Master Plan Study, developing or reviewing inventories of known and potential cultural heritage resources within the study area can identify specific resources that may play a significant role in guiding the evaluation of alternatives for subsequent project-driven EAs. While some cultural heritage resources may have already been formally identified, others may be identified through screening and evaluation. Aboriginal communities may have knowledge that can contribute to the identification of cultural heritage resources, and we suggest that any engagement with Aboriginal communities includes a discussion about known or potential cultural heritage resources that are of value to these communities. Municipal Heritage Committees, historical societies and other local heritage organizations may also have knowledge that contributes to the identification of cultural heritage resources. Archaeological Resources Your EA project may impact archaeological resources and you should screen the project with the MTCS Criteria for Evaluatinq Archaeoloqical Potential to determine if an archaeological assessment is needed. MTCS archaeological sites data are available at archaeology(cDontario.ca. If your EA project area exhibits archaeological potential, then an archaeological assessment (AA) should be undertaken by an archaeologist licenced under the OHA, who is responsible for submitting the report directly to MTCS for review Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscapes The MTCS Criteria for Evaluating Potential for Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes should be completed to help determine whether your EA project may impact cultural heritage resources. Clerks for the Municipality of Bayham and Elgin County can provide information on property registered or designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. Municipal Heritage Planners can also provide information that will assist you in completing the checklist. If potential or known heritage resources exist, MTCS recommends that a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by a qualified consultant, should be completed to assess potential project impacts. Our Ministry's Info Sheet#5:Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans outlines the scope of HIAs. Please send the HIA to MTCS for review, and make it available to local organizations or individuals who have expressed interest in review. Environmental Assessment Reporting All technical heritage studies and their recommendations are to be addressed and incorporated into EA projects. Please advise MTCS whether any technical heritage studies will be completed for your EA project, and provide them to MTCS before issuing a Notice of Completion. If your screening has identified no known or potential cultural heritage resources, or no impacts to these resources, please include the completed checklists and supporting documentation in the EA report or file. Thank-you for consulting MTCS on this project: please continue to do so through the EA process, and contact me for any questions or clarification. Sincerely, Joseph Muller, RPP/MCIP Heritage Planner Joseph.Muler@Ontario.ca Copied to: Paul Shipway, CAO, Municipality of Bayham It is the sole responsibility of proponents to ensure that any information and documentation submitted as part of their EA report or file is accurate. MTCS makes no representation or warranty as to the completeness,accuracy or quality of the any checklists, reports or supporting documentation submitted as part of the EA process,and in no way shall MTCS be liable for any harm, damages,costs,expenses,losses,claims or actions that may result if any checklists, reports or supporting documents are discovered to be inaccurate,incomplete,misleading or fraudulent. Please notify MTCS if archaeological resources are impacted by EA project work.All activities impacting archaeological resources must cease immediately,and a licensed archaeologist is required to carry out an archaeological assessment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act and the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists. If human remains are encountered,all activities must cease immediately and the local police as well as the Cemeteries Regulation Unit of the Ministry of Government and Consumer Services must be contacted. In situations where human remains are associated with archaeological resources, MTCS should also be notified to ensure that the site is not subject to unlicensed alterations which would be a contravention of the Ontario Heritage Act. Sarah Brent From: Paul Shipway <PShipway@bayham.on.ca> Sent: Wednesday,June 15, 2016 8:30 AM To: Amanda Froese Subject: FW: Bayham's Public Information Centre,June 18, 2016 re drainage program Attachments: 21 Erieus Jan 14 2014 flooded basin.JPG; 21 Erieus Jan 29 2013 basin overflow.JPG; 21 Erieus Jan 29 2013 flooded north yard.JPG Consultation submission Paul Shipway CAO Municipality of Bayham 9344 Plank Rd. Straffordville, ON NOJ 1Y0 Office: (519) 866-5521 pshipway(o bayham.on.ca From:John Seldon [mailto:idseldon@hotmail.com] Sent:June-15-16 7:57 AM To: Paul Shipway<PShipway@bayham.on.ca> Subject: Bayham's Public Information Centre,June 18, 2016 re drainage program June 15, 2016 Mr. Shipway: I had hoped to attend the upcoming drainage meeting here in Port Burwell on June 18th; it is a useful process and is most welcome. However, some time ago Dianne and I were scheduled to be in Maryland, leaving tomorrow in fact (June the 161h). I have been working on a summary of the flooding experiences we have encountered at 21 Erieus in Port Burwell so when the notification of the meeting came up and I realized we would not be able to attend, I put together a summary of concerns into a letter addressed to you and it is attached. I have also attached a number of pictures illustrating flooding here at 21 Erieus; if you want more, I have dozens! If you have any questions please let me know and I will answer them in as timely a fashion as I can. Regardless, I welcome the public meeting—it is an essential part of the process for resolving serious matters like these and that is a very positive thing indeed. Regards with thanks, John Seldon Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Spam i R f 4 U &, � '0. �'�.,•_`DIY �.r�tii..lR- 3 Sarah Brent From: Paul Shipway <PShipway@bayham.on.ca> Sent: Wednesday,June 15, 2016 8:29 AM To: Amanda Froese Subject: FW: Drainage letter - attached -John Seldn Attachments: Letter to PS re storm water mtg June 18 2016 June 12 2016.docx; ROAD 42 - PORT BURWELL-07.pdf Consultation submission Paul Shipway CAO Municipality of Bayham 9344 Plank Rd. Straffordville, ON NOJ 1Y0 Office: (519) 866-5521 pshipway(o bayham.on.ca From:John Seldon [mailto:idseldon@hotmail.com] Sent:June-15-16 8:03 AM To: Paul Shipway<PShipway@bayham.on.ca> Subject: Drainage letter-attached -John Seldn June 15, 2016 Mr. Shipway: I believe I attached the pictures I wanted to send in my email but not the letter! Here it is along with a copy of a drawing I got from Elgin County in 2011. Thanks again. John Seldon Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Spam Phish/Fraud Not spam Forget previous vote i John Seldon Storm Water Flooding, Port Burwell 21 Erieus St. June 15, 2016 Mr. Paul Shipway, CAO Municipality of Bayham 9344 Plank Road Straffordville, ON NOJ IY0 Reference: Public Information Centre, June 18, 2016: Municipal Class Environmental Assessment: Master Drainage Study for Port Burwell Mr. Shipway: My wife and I are residents of the Municipality of Bayham and in particular, Port Burwell, living at 21 Erieus Street. We welcome the development of a drainage plan for this community as it is badly needed. The Public Information Centre (PIC) meeting for June 18, 2016 " ... to review the problem statements" is most welcome. I have long communicated with Bayham about the storm water problems experienced here at 21 Erieus and would truly enjoy attending. However, some time ago, we were scheduled to visit family in Maryland, leaving Thursday, June 161h, so we will not be able to attend. Consequently I have summarized the highlights of our concerns below, which I would have addressed at the meeting if I was able to attend. I am also in the process of reviewing my correspondence with Bayham over the last 6 to 7 years regarding our storm water concerns, along with the Meritech Engineering report already in place. In the meantime, the following are our primary issues of concern for 21 Erieus Street (Area#2, in Meritech's Storm Sewer System Assessment, Port BurwellNienna): 1. In the conclusions of Meritech's Assessment report it states that"Properties are situated in some instances at grades lower than the roadway." This is one of the key problems at 21 Erieus Street and has resulted in flooding of the property's north and east yards as well as the house basement for over 30 years. 2. In Meritech's complementary Cost Assessment report, Meritech's prioritizing within the proposed sewer network is by Catchment, Existing Conditions and Area Served. It does not appear to take into consideration properties like 21 Erieus which are below road grade. a. Why was this not a factor in their consideration? 3. In Meritech's Cost Assessment report it appears that assigning priority to Erieus Street reflects: a. Catchment: Assigned value is 4 in a range of 1 to 10 with the 10 representing the most critical location of the network(the outlet). b. Area Serviced: Assigned value is 1 in a range of 1 to 10, with 1 representing a small catchment area"... with few homes contributing to the sewer." c. Existing Conditions: Assigned value is 10 in a range of 1 to 10 where 10 represents the worst conditions. 1 John Seldon Storm Water Flooding, Port Burwell 21 Erieus St. 4. In Meritech's Cost Assessment report's Discussion section, the first table noted (numbering of the table's in this report seems to be confusing with table titles located at the bottom of each table) shows Erieus Street with a repair/replacement priority of 3 based on the catchment, area serviced and existing conditions evaluation process. a. Table#3 indicates that Priority 3 work is proposed for 11 to 19 years in the future. 5. If the needed work to correct the flooding issues at 21 Erieus is to take another 11 to 19 years it will mean that flooding of this property due to municipal road work putting the property below grade will be ongoing for a total of 40 to 50 years. This is compounded by the fact that the existing conditions are given a ranking of 10—the worst that can be assigned. a. Consequently, 21 Erieus Street is hostage to potential flooding for up to half a century because the road work was done badly in 1983, the existing storm water system was not maintained over the years and that it is in a small catchment area. 6. In the Conclusions and Recommendations of the cost assessment report, `Erieus Street at Victoria Street" is listed in the priority 1 section. It is unclear as to what that entails. a. Does this priority 1 include work at 21 Erieus street? 7. For your information I have attached a copy of County Rd 42, as constructed drainage (drawing) 1983-1984 for Plan no. AS-22, Plan 211-84 which I obtained from Elgin County in 2011. a. The date indicates that the below grade situation has been in place for at least 32 years. b. The drawing shows how a catchment basin was located on the 21 Erieus Street property. This is the basin to which our basement sump pumps accumulated ground water; from there it is conveyed by gravity to the municipal storm water system. It is debateable whether this drawing is accurate in describing the connection between the 21 Erieus yard catch basin and the municipal storm water system. Recall that Bayham's Mr. LeMay(no longer with Bayham) directed the writer(at the writer's cost)to install a check valve in the discharge line from the basin to prevent storm water from backing into this basin during periods of high flow. However, as the municipal system cannot carry storm water away fast enough along Erieus, during periods of high storm water flow, this check valve is blocked from opening by the head of water in the municipal system and water cannot discharge from the yard basin, thereby flooding the yards and basement at 21 Erieus. The only option in this case is to pump basement sump water directly to the curb through a hose crossing the north yard to the curb on Wellington. Once again, we are held hostage to being placed below grade and a failed municipal storm water system. c. In effect 21 Erieus Street was forced into becoming a storm water receiving basin and the basement a municipal storm water pumping station. d. Another consideration is what damage will have been done to the foundation of this 100 plus year old house at 21 Erieus from 32 years plus of having water collecting around it and not just from the property itself but from the adjacent lot on the property's south side, as well. I have attached pictures of the outside flooding for your information. e. On top of all this, storm water is not a clean commodity. Flooding of property by storm water is a public health hazard. 2 John Seldon Storm Water Flooding, Port Burwell 21 Erieus St. I will continue to review my correspondence with Bayham on these matter and summarize any additional information that may be helpful, in light of Meritech's reports. However, I believe the above information addresses the most immediate points—certainly ones that I would like to have addressed at the meeting on June 18, 2016. Any insight you can provide into whether we can expect some relief from this conundrum before another 11 to 19 years pass would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and consideration. Regards, John Seldon 3 F ll 1 It + i I tr ,, t 'r +Irr y + + � rLI f ? 'FI I. '+ r+r i- + {..t -. t r ,.+ r 11 1 I rt I r- - -- I lr � JI t l + ill +t + , I + F i t__ I 1 ..� I L r- , [t I I�� 1k 1«. Iif I I I r : m C;-rlf II , 11 I li,;.. I"L rI , + r r_k + fl k � 1 ,� +�F ' Y� rI' ,:� - { i. rid T - - in i _1 {I Yt II t +I- Irr- 1F1 I+ �.- t J r t� t Yr rat t it f r� O t --r it I i Ilr r ++ I- r { -TirT N }I , +r�,{} 1!-{! 11 t i+if { , r t I - �i z �f1 EaT{'-..{{ .1.. 1+, 11-j . r1 rr �1 t T 1 .+,� ,,. d r , ;D +C7 C rt -1trt1 �1 + 1 + f, tt}i i Fi ,�-{ 1 } �+ t+__+ � I. - , - C -� Z y.-G Il l i i r r 1. i.I t `r + r I f r -' + F+ I t 1 r f, I+ T__ � I .yTT+ -r"t r [) JJ r -- 1 1 I {-+ I t , r t{ F -r� t r -i �1 1+ l _u � 9 m z i_�, Iri t .{- + tl f � , t Sl tl T! t CF I I 0 } j{ r,11 r Y h 1 T- i rl + ++ I+ ,T 1 i - r '� m CI ,... 1 I- t r r , o r I r j{{ 11} , -1I+ 1 r i t I T r-, r + sty 1f t + a-} -Ir r Z Z u D rt, I Itl F - I IC �r , r z z 0 Yf _i '� - ' 1 -S r ' [I Fr rI.(l I1 �1.r1 I +i m r I r +i + _I ,L� 4 r ..dd t- I I - -r I r --I 1i"iil I [I'I I,_ I 4i t ,__: r +{ a �+ H _ I t 'I + + n� W ..G+1 I_j , _� 11 l.. I Lr ti �,.. r,, + N C f 1 1 T i r-j�r li= +ref, 1 k � a{f:_ '1 A w r i:1 1 I .,F ,11 t I fYr--I I- -' 1 Iq r [_ I I' ,I;:. CD r .)a + r [ r - ' 1 r J `'71 S.S.i-T - , -+ r r It{ I If I ,t } I_{}I ` I I -, rI I _I r r ,:.-r I r ' -1 k- I. , I + r r T{ [ - 1-1 -- - - - r .I - - _ rlt 11 t r{ tI +rF +rT 11 I1 I t F I �I _ ' rl 1 +-�rt `r I rl'1 + r : I S ':- + -+ I ' -`---�'' ' l ,. 1 ... I ---rr - I 11 , r - I -1 71 -1 I I- _4"T4 [' a_ r irfr- r r}, r - I ._t: t + rr- �.m�' C -, 1 1 + r r t -I 1 t 1 r !I - t I'4 1 - r tr + r _ I =) �- - I I ; i ROBINSON ST l HW Y. N° /9l 'I 'I t[ �r { r { I .._I #r �I,r.. I z 1 r _t 1 -I - I - i - �. it flrl t t II I 1 I I i ' {i1r I { t t i j 1 �{ L tI _ II r rl+- I r ((( , ,I� !, ,,, .L; ',i, r, r .I `!I,,1 r TZa I .1 i 1 r -t I t + t I�_+ r- t --t ,$ 1 1+ - 1 _ T 1 Irr j It + i. .I '..I '.. r ;r r� 17r: m J 7 -•-A-'-:- -•-- I� I i I I L l F 11 _Lr- 1 1 t z `$F t I {Ih1 te r , { 'II I r� rt _ Irr i � t— r Tr ' - _. ._ - .. C �,r �: #�1 t r �, I r rf., ' 1IT 11 FI"-Y+s - ;�.-Ft--� i1'�= k T- Y1.1a I }1T t-{r }�- r+ +Ir-r C +-{{ t r r i , r, rr +- r,1 "" t { +, t- +t1-r ... u t I * �- t I t I!. �I IIr 7 T + i r + I I' 1{ J t1—�� tr,I r(r T fl Ir1 . ��_I r rr $C C �r� t T I. t- F +Tr r ,7 it �I a (� ` {, t + r + + k � Y t i t 1 t + r "" I _ I F 1 i-I _+ �r f -1-r+t} r Imo-' FL t_ { L .-,T+I 1 i?: , r1 4 f t -. '' �+ } 4 L rr I f, r .II.- .. ' t ".{ I; I 1 C-i r*r i 1 -r I i t r r y'• I - ^, it'Ct f rIi I-I Irr-'- f I- r '� tI 1 hr I I, rS I1 1_ r II n �-{-r 1 I Yj II�l r I I I1- i.,:-I-' -rT-I-+ FT + +- r t O +- C 1 1[ r._ E {I _t,i `I , 111 r y „ 1'. ' " {I: Z I1 17 _ilr ,i � I Ir I I '_L. yYr I -, I it+r- I , + lT- l . �I1 I ,- ,I :::71 _< t .-�If i.. rT ' {1 1 : I I _ ' Ili 1 I �' r { + . i t `1 'I' Y T L �i . t��l f I - j t r l r- {� 1 I I{ ,.-' r. - r 1 1 7" r :111 i ;4 - � �j'-H': -.,44 -f'I f1�1 .1r + r :1T + 7rI ICI FT I r {i r itr {�{ +4- r lT s r a { Y r -t ..' ,-r I r I 1 -1-r t -C i I I - 1+T,t � - I { I I r III , j N FT 1 + r r t T {+ , �I- + �L d jr 1-1 hti4H - r r1_ 11 L- T� i -t-[� 1�rt� {II-Y1 I 1 j' T TT i .. t' �I+ .:+{+IF =F, '_ r f1 - , F I + +a.m.pr �' 1-' *a' } -T y ��, 1 r.rr�. rt .x r. k.- r r -i r I I - t t r J h t t I ;(S ! ,.- r+ -I - I I T rrl r r t r - {- II r -- Ila I I �tr I1,11 11 I-7 I II -a r - r ' I- t I'I j{r T 7 ?-7 - +- r I' t - 1 I I: I� r �I ' 4 �' I, 'f 1 r iI 0 I I , + ._ q t r' r I t l a I I -r z_. __ SP ,"i..i _I [ r I-.t 1 1 .' .r _i:-:r. S��'1: r Ilr�{� ,,.1 +' ,'1 -- -� Y— --- __>___ __ __LL .- -L-.- I I rL ,�.., �� + .. .k: . h i ( I - ERIEUS STREET I ` I k .I { l 1 I . r- - - - -- C I I -r -� I - Ir f - I II r ,i + ! I I ,I ik` r -1 1�11j i. ! I ,, 1 I- I -t f1 r r- fI IL' D �- I-r i..I t I1 I'! — - —__ —_-r — --- .- li - — _ _` t I f C k I I f {' f I - - _- ._ ! ;. �..r^.___ _ __ _ - ____ �T _- 4 : dI G. I 1 i e c_sP_ _ f I f �I „ I , :.I 1,i 1�: �E �" I i�� - C '.7- 7-: . , .-- i' I , r r ( , h ,�+ r , - IT mII t • _ I ..1 _ ,11 �I r. �h r 1 r Y + { - r - t r r 1 I , ,:I t _ a n 1 I 1 1 I�+ r 1 I r II ., ,I r _I II -j t... I [_yI I II 1- r I t ja r--� II , f�t--��---�• 1.I , �� II -1 �.I�, � 1:.,:.�.--_� ,,I'.-T-T- :i t �I� 1 r I�; :71 Ii � _ I IW - —I I m - i �� I ' LE �' _ 13 - . ,__==cad -- = '1n� 1_- - �_ x.^- -4 _ a �._ _. �. GIt cR rYn -'-�____nLE- STRACHAN all °Q 1+4 �1 „a a STREET i 1 I I , - ' 11 'I' Ir E., - fyi I I"TILE_,� =-t I� 1 I YI , Ir y r 1 - I I , ,I1 Ir ` -1 I I II +I J- I - II 11 n ['. 1 II it f y L' r r I II n u- 1 r r I I 1 „ ry �� u� - I 1 1 L,-I `r' II n �m t. ._._ / r II I11 i 1 T f 1 [ II , { - I I + - I L I 1 1^ . III II I r .II U Tr P tl } I.1 1 t r I II r tI r i F jI + I II`-+ tr' +� I� r ' +:-i , i.I I- rr �r--1- T + { C -i 1 t } I i 1}I I'',+ - + I II t 1'+ t +tt rr i -r r I t1 r t° Frr7 -I a V r i 1 74I + - ; IIC r,- i rI !r +S ,, I 7 T 1 r� .I Appendix B; Existing Documents MEFZITECH F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY of BAYHAM SCHEDULE V PORT BURWELL: o LAND USE and CONSTRAINTS I Land Use Residential ® Multi Unit Residential � Harbour Residential/Commercial soa, LLi ms, Commercial 1 Institutional Industrial "" s Open Space E O � Conservation Lands q � Specific Policy Areas iee a sr _ Constraints r 1 Hazard Lands a Sewage Treatment Facilities i of • Existing Petroleum Wells Base Features � — County Roads a ® Local Roads 9q� c � U / SPECIFIC POLICY Lake Erie AREA NO.2 15 . NNE� WQr➢E S 0 125 250 500 Metres 1:10,000 r� c, Schedule V forms part of Official Plan of the Municipality of Bayham and must %'. January 2012 be read in conjunction with the written text. R1 � SEE SCHEDULE A-MAP No.14 V I "C2 SEE SEE SCHEDULE A-MAP No.13 c OS2 C3 0S1 R1(h2) � R1 OS2; a� v R1 0S1 vS� I C2 a_ C3(h2) 5p l R2 M4 R1 �a C2 R2(h2) Q o OS2 I R1-7 C3(h2) C3 LIBBYE•ST SEE INSET MAP / R1 h2 �. R1 ( ) OS2 �ii ��F R2(h2) R1 u iNSET MAP — EANNAHsT R1-7 r -� MH R2 —WATERLOOST F _ COS R1-10 �� R1 R1(h2) R2 ° R1 OS2-9 I C1 I r WELLINGTONST C2 C2 I I OS2-5(h2) 5 �C1 � 5 I o I a z R1 -1 I R2 a R1 5 MH C2, ti MH 1 OS2 F 1 ro e 4, --R� = OS2-5(h2) `TTST MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM Legend SCHEDULE I NORTH (� LPRCA Regulation Limit o mo zoo aor PORT BURWELL Metres Ministry t , Cert- c to No. .1-7R3-:82437. . . .. . . .. .. . of the (Continued) E Environment Ontario Certificate of Approval (Sewage) Whereas - 3 - Qr has applied In accordance with Section 24 of the Ontario Water Resourcos Act for approval of:-- STORM SEWERS STREET FROM TO Robinson Street Lake Erie Approx. 25 m North of Pitt Street Erieus Street Strachan Street Approx. 90 m S.W. of Victoria Street FORCEMAINS Brock Street Approx. 50 m West Frieus Street of Strachan Street (Proposed Sewage Pumping Station No.]) Erieus Street Brock Street Wellington Street Easement parallel Approx. 95 ►n North- County Road 42 to Union Street east of County Road 42 (Proposed Sewage Pumping Station No.2) County Road 42 Union Street Bridge Street Bridge Street County Road 42 Approx. 70 in S.E. of Chatham Street SEWAGE PUMPING STATION N0.1 - to be located on the south side of Brock Street on the west side of Hagerman Street and consisting of a submersible type sewage pumping station to be equipped with two (2) 3.18 L/s @ 5.8 m T.O.M. submersible raw sewage pumps; an emergency forcemain by-pass; an emergency overflow sewer; and all necessary appurtenances and controls; . ..4 Now therefore this is to certifythat after due enquiry the said proposed works have been approved j under Section 24 of the Ontario Water Resources Act. ! DATED AT TORONTO this 9th (Mv(A September 19 83 Appendix C.,, Storm Drainage Area Plans and Sewer Design Sheets MERIT ECH F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx va n 6� w & M E N 01net Dime, W Pr 17 Ca[cnmem[B-u nes -, APEd Drainage Area Pr fi7.6m-300mm0 PVC am @ 3.00% ID Drainage Area Number } rMHl 0.48 ' I aunoff coefficient lfi '0.76 Pr MH 1 GA`�� ♦` I 1.10 .�C�� [` ` �� 0.99 ♦ Ig 0.55 6�GO o.za '� 0.4o I 18 Pr MH 1 C� Pr Q-45ommm wC St.@ 1.50% 0.97 Pr H 0 Pr 9.2m-3]Smmm wC Rm @a.6oWo `_�_ MH wft H 95 ' V� \ 'c iIE8 0.72 1 „fin 1 0.62 20 Pr H ` 0 .4.ao ♦ / a Ia .4o Pr 74.1m-666mmm we stm@1.66% bl � PrM 3 �I Pr H Pr 17.91-375 mm WC am @ 0.60% o�r MH 8 �� doodOO- Pr MH 931 g Pr 378-375mmm we St.@ 0.W% Pr H 94 I ` I� °83 Pr MH 7� 0.25 I 6 i 0.40 I 13 0.59 0.40 If Pr MH 4 Pr 58.0m,600mmo PVC am @ 0.60%` Pr M 2 0.40 I� 0.84 0Z% 0.40 ry�d�0 ' 0.40 0.40 I �I % ry M 4 �dolp WILLIAM ST �♦ ' 0.40 E IN ` ,m'/ Pr Pr 120.3m-6]Smme Comc Shn@O.fi0% MH 7�L� Pr 6.bm-300mm0 PVC am @ 0.60% � E I� 0'AMH 7 0.92 jOC 02ga o I '� °`39 ♦♦♦ '`NEWTON ST♦-Pr ♦♦♦ 0.45 ' ✓� °z40 0.35 0.40 0.18 l0 9 ♦ R 53.1m-3]SmmO PVC Rm1.0a% op .40 Q ' H r MH 81 Pr S6.om-3aommm am @ O.fio% 0 Pr MH 3 _�� Pr MH Pr MH 88 Pr MH 2 ' r 90.em-300mmm wC Stm 0.55 r ioo.zm-ersm�conic sim @ o.eo Pr H 5 Pr 44.Jm-]50mmm CaM Rm @ om%Y< ` 0.40/ ' 15 `♦ ' Pr 14.7m-825n,Rlm @ 0.80% de Pr H 6 Outlet � I ` _mmo Co ' `` / R53.m-6]Smm®CnncS[m@2:63% ObZ I9e ; Macneil Ct oZg1 I pr 66.]m-300mmo PVC Rm @ I.0O% o ` ' �1 ♦ ' Pr MH 27 y� Pr 3].9m-]50mm0 z Imo. Il.l $ 0.40 Conc S.@ 0.60% 7I� = Ti, Pr MH 40 rMH 26 ♦ W 2 IN Q .� H E Iv U 0.17 Pr MH 6 V 1.07 d .� le Cn IY^ 25 I q 34 V) 0.90 0.68 Pr Twin fi0.4m--o Conc am @ 3.00% °40 IA.I ¢ qp� g1 0.40 I IE 0.40 Y d� 0340 0.40 IM ' O IE ` Pr MH 58, 0.52 IE Q p,51 ` W I R54.3m-525mmo WC Rm@0.60% Pr 39.8m-1200mmm ConaS[m @ 0.60% ' 35 � ` E ' 29 l u.xe INN a.4D Is ` o ' 0.40 zo / *rrI f a.+o $ �� ♦ �� ♦ �a IPo /� HANNAH ST oao r R 115�111tlisnu l7e[e'�€@ 0.60% ♦ Pr 24.6m-1050mmm Can,a.@ 0,60% ♦ R 33.7m-975mmo Cumin am @ 0.70%♦ 0.17 40 Pr 15.1-50mmm wC am@0.60% H7 - ♦ ♦ WATERLOO ST ` 36 R]8.9m mmm one _ 0.40 rMH Pr 12o.an-soommo fc Stm,a 70o. •� rM 91 > a�.s��a_, r i13.]mfi00m�PVC Pr MH1 Fr Pr MH3 Pr MH 32 Pr MH3 Pr MH 30 g � � � G� �Pr MH2 MH2 �rM R9.Sm-600mmm PVC S[m01.00% 0.38 .5 0.61 0.53 37 Pr 59.Sm-375mm0 wC 5[m @ 2.5a% ♦♦ 0.55 dop g J ` 0 0 aI 36 / e ♦ 0.40 3 R 52.9m-6o0mm0 PVC SVn @ 0.27 1.00% ` / E a ' 4z H 3 }P MH 105 0.65 OB 2 31 EI 0.47 ♦ I Pr M 110 60 MH 114 0.70 �8-alI 0.40 ; s Vl 0340 ° 3 1 f 1.07 I o o 0.45 0.50 r H 1 I Pr MH 102 r %r MH 1 1 I ` I; 0.93 N ° `�� Pr MH 9 49 3 1 N 54 ! ? y R J]:Im-3J5mmm wC S[m@1.W% 0.75 0,17 ' Q 5 Pr%.1m-300mm0 wC Rm @ 1.00% J9a 0.25 Pr 56.6m-30ommm PVC am@ 1.00% I 0.24 / ` r E E 0.95 d 0.56 I o73 aa0 / WELLINGTON ST Pr 4.Imaoommm cs[m@Lao% 0.23 ` IP /�� 0.53 ♦♦ 75 I ]4 ♦ r�0 o.ss ' 0.65 c R 12z.emiSom�PVC s[_cao�% _ H1 PgMu1 _ Q� s� r 122.3m-1asomml Conc s[m @ 0.5o io9.]m-900mm1 Conc 5!m @ 1.io% Pr MH 10 Pr 108.4m-9wmm Um:5[m®0.60% �r MH P�i3i.omasOmmm come Strn @ 0.60% r- -�� Pr MH m 0 ♦ ♦ 0.66 P,%.3m-a50mmm wC 5ym @ 1, ` ♦ ' ♦ Pr 59.1m-900mm0 Cmrc Stm ' ♦♦ °so / t o a s Pr 106.7m-375mma PVC St.@ 1.00% I _ ve 3 xx Pr 109.Sm-1a50mmo Conc SOn @ 060% Pr 113.Sm-375mm0 wC Sbm`001,5 Pr 69.2mJ50mmm wC Sbn @ 0.60% ; Pr]9.3£OOmmO PVC s[m @ 0.60% 0fi 9 a °B 8 39 +♦` See Dwg 4423-Stm2 I °5a0 / 1.7s r H o.65 I a \\ / Pr MM LD ' 0.55 r uu.--mu,m0 PK S.@ 1.80 r 300.2m-825m m Conc Stm @ C. Pr H 5 Pr 44.Jmasommm wnm sxm @ 0^60% % ' 15 $eE DW 442$-$tfil l ' Pr 19Jm-825mmm COnc Stm @ 0.80% pf H 6 0.40 9 ' ` Pr53.Bm575mmmCoricS[m@2.63% IEo `LLcnalt 1°24166.Jm-3oommm we scn @ 1.DD% /Pr MH 140 H 26 En z LU = Q V c f LL! 1� ¢ E I I€ LU Pr MH U 1.07 d `a 0.68 ('n 1$ (n 03860 � ¢e Pr Twin 60.4m-675mmm Conc 5[m @ 3.00% p.40 W V) °90 @ I < 0.40 1°� I 0.40 Y E 040 0340 LO IN I 2g IE J Pr MH 0 W � Ip Q W P 54.3m-525mmm P c Str @ 0.60% r MH 27 E•8 0.52 _ �P H I£ p291 ` c Pr 39.Bm-1200mmm Conc 5[m @ 0.60% -- 0.28 E 0.40 E '� 0.4p 1280 93 o.4ol� ♦ $� �� ♦ I' �� ♦ > .0� HANNAH ST 0.4p Gr 11.5m-1200mmm Conc Stm @ a6o% ` h 24.6m-1DS0mm0 Conc shn @ O.fiO% ♦ Pr33.7.-975mmm Conc a.@ O.JD%♦♦ WATERLOO ST >a MH Pr 15.1m450mmm PK 5[m @ 0.60% �MH _ nc Sty%♦ / P��2.6m-1200mm�Cnrc S[�@ 0�0% a m R]�.9m-9J�mmm sc Strn .7m6�➢Omm=PK 5[�@ .0=% ° _ 120.Ompmmm PK Stm @ i.00 M 91 Pr MH1 Pr MH3 Pr MH 32�: Pr MH3 Pr MH 30 �Pr MH2 rMH2 M wp.5rn6p0m wcso-n�r.OD� �� 0.45 0.38 -r� Pr 54.Sm-3Jsmmm wC S.@ 2.50% 1 ♦ 0Q55 � 0.61 a 0.53 3] p.v `♦♦ ��' P �� I o340 �o ♦♦ ntt�wa�wcscaal.00% o� Di 0.65 0.52 �I ` v 61 0 97 ♦ M 1 }P MH 105 Bz 0.70r MH 7 114 ` 1 m ^ %I 0.40 *L6 ■ 150r H 1 3 0.5o mil 3, 54 E Pr77.Im-375mmm PK stm @ 1.00% 0.75 0.27 ` Pr 58.Sm-3DDmmm PVC Stm @ 1.00% 3 4a I 0 75 Pr 58.6m-30omm0 PK son @ 1.00% I 0.24 ` 1 0.25 0.45 0540 °73 °81 WELLINGTON ST % Prs9.1m-3➢DmmmPKSm@1.D➢% °J53 IP �I p.53 ♦�♦ 1 0.75 0.40 79 0.55 0.65 _ Pr 1z2.am4sOmmm PK u_@ Dom% _ H 12 � pr.MH 1 r MH r 122.3m-SOSOmmm coot @@ 0.60 f 09Jm-9DOmm0 ConcConc Son`@ 1.10% P�MH 10 Pr 106.4m-900mr�Conc Stm Pr 132.OmJ50mmm Canc Shn @ 0.90% r �� Pr MH ` ♦♦ ' ♦♦ EO Prr99.3m450m1.16 Pr 59.1m-900mmmGmc S[m@0.60%76 ` `� ' ` ♦♦ o.50 ♦ 00 ` Pr 106.]m-375mm0 PK 5[m @ 1.00% I ♦_ Pr 309.Bm-ID6Ommm Conc 5[m @ 0.60% lr Pr 113.1m315mmm PVC 5[m @ 1.00% Pr 69.2m-450mm0 wC 5[m @ 0.60% 0 69 0.88 + Pr]9`-60ommm WC S. 0.60% 0.49 0675 0 65 I U9 ♦ I °5� ' 1 578 0.40 ' 0.50 I 13 ' Pr MH00 1 ` t' ! �I 0.5 r MH 14 ' �I �I r l .3mf0pmm6 PVC Stm @ 0.60% ' i-- E 0.40 0.p6 '��>�,7,�,�. 0.39 0.75 EI In Pr 12 Pr i3J6mfi0pmm0 PVC Stm@O.fiO% � EI 1J,J Pr MH 11 yy 0.75 0.66 A i 0.40 ' I H 0.40 U) 61 U Pr 27.7m-375mmm WC Stm @ 7 0.60% r M 15♦♦♦ 070 71 0.67 ' g LU ` 0.40. , °690 Q a r MH 12 LU $I m 0.40 I U rMH 119 > 'I U (n 1 r M 27 2.03 I �,K w a wl 0652 E� 0.79 Q Im? �I 0.40Lu r MH 108__ g ++ mI .4 -. ml 0.50 �pp 0.40 = 0.- `-\ > (�Z E EN U 1€ �� ,... rMH 118 pr E I 0 ml w yHgpq ml 0.72 m z �I 6: � IE dp q Im 9�,z 0.401 ca 0.46 0 '' o8o ` d PrMH111 �I ' Pr MH 1 _ Pr=22.8m37smmPK son @ o�qs 0.56 ml Pr�6.5m-12�OOmm�Conc Sh @ 0.. p r MH 117 N r MH1 rMl 1 0.40 M 67 Pr 40.Om-300mmm PK 5[m 1.OD% Pr 9.4m-1200mmm Conc S[m @ O.fiO^h Pr 20.Sm-375m� vl ` Pr MH we slm@o.6o% 'm' d 0.58 _12 Pr 71.2m-300mmm PK Slm@1.00% 81 '' BROCK ST Pr 31.3m-1200mm0 coot 5[m@0.60% ♦ 0.40 I ` *j�7�9 Pr M 116 p,4p 1 Pr MH 133 0 22 r 0764 ` 0.40 0 40 r H 12 Eo.�E4Q�o: � z pf MH 139 Pr 30.3m-IN10mmm coot 5[m @ 0.60% � Pr MH 1 K e n �Pr 4➢.1m-1200mmm coot St, Pr MH 135 C rJ Q � Outlet#2 le coLiz-:� 0 s Pr 52.7m-900mm0 Core 5[m @ c ro a ro Pr I 1H 123 Leoend Q .■■ Detlet Divide m �� Ca[chmen[Bountlaries C� 5 Area Drainage Area 3 ID Drainage Area Number E m LAKE ERIE amn0n 6aent too s Page 1 of 7 M E R I T E G H Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min. Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheet 6.0 m/s max. Project: Port Burwell for I=A/(Tc+B)^C File: 4423 Municipality of Bayham A= 1007.05 n= 0.024 CSP Calc'd by:JEL Ref# MOE Ref Num B= 7.382 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE Date: 16-Jun-16 C= 0.804 Chk'd by: CHT Date: 8-Au -16 5 Year Design Storm Rational Formula: Q=CIA/0.36 Concentration time:tc=ti+tf(minute) Manning Equation: Where: Q:peak flow(L/s) Where: ti:inlet time before pipe(minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000(L/s) C:runoff coefficient tf:time of flow in pipe(minute) D:pipe size(mm) I:rainfall intensity(mm/hr) tf=L/60V S:slope(grade)of pipe(%) A:area ha Min.ti= 10 n:roughness coeffiecient Location Runoff Pipe Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'I S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) Ws) (m) (mm) (%) NO (m/s) (Min.) (m/s) North of Wellington Street,to Outlet 1 Ma le Meadows 77 791 1 2.35 0.65 1.528 1.528 10.00 10.57 101.394 430.219 58.0 600 PVC 0.60% 475.611 1.682 0.57 90% 1.926 William Street 77 79 1 1.528 10.57 79 4 1 2 0.44 0.45 0.199 1.726 10.57 11.68 98.776 473.688 120.3 675 PVC 0.60% 651.117 1.820 1.10 73% 2.001 Victoria Street N of Newton 1 2 3 1.10 0.55 0.604 0.604 10.00 10.88 101.394 170.088 103.8 450 PVC 1.20% 312.318 1.964 0.88 54% 2.003 2 3 4 0.72 0.60 0.433 1.037 10.88 11.34 97.442 280.715 55.0 525 PVC 1.00% 430.062 1.987 0.46 65% 2.126 3 4 5 0.83 0.40 0.330 1.368 11.34 12.24 95.507 362.794 90.3 600 PVC 0.60% 475.611 1.682 0.89 76% 1.867 79 4 1.726 11.68 4 5 6 0.22 0.40 0.087 3.181 12.24 12.55 91.989 812.925 48.5 675 PVC 1.20% 920.818 2.573 0.31 88% 2.933 Milton Street N of Newton 93 6 7 0.71 0.40 0.286 0.286 10.00 11.32 101.394 80.450 112.2 375 PVC 0.80% 156.820 1.420 1.32 51% 1.420 Shakes Bare St N of Newton 94 80 8 1 0.84 0.40 0.335 0.335 10.00 11.26 101.394 94.240 107.1 375 PVC 0.80% 156.820 1.420 1.26 60% 1.491 Newton Street 4 5 3.181 12.55 5 6 9 0.18 0.40 0.070 3.252 12.55 12.79 90.822 820.359 53.8 675 PVC 2.60% 1355.408 3.788 0.24 61% 3.977 93 6 0.286 11.32 6 80 10 0.35 0.40 0.142 3.679 12.79 13.48 89.964 919.396 100.2 825 PVC 0.80% 1283.893 2.402 0.70 72% 2.618 94 80 0.335 11.26 80 81 4.014 13.48 13.59 87.546 976.050 14.7 825 PVC 0.80% 1283.893 2.402 0.10 76% 2.666 81 82 11 11 1 0.39 0.40 0.156 0.156 10.00 10.82 101.394 44.050 90.8 300 PVC 1.80% 129.738 1.835 0.82 34% 1.624 82 83 1 1 0.156 10.82 11.08 97.685 42.439 16.0 300 PVC 0.60% 74.904 1.060 0.25 57% 1.091 Strachan Street N of Waterloo 82 83 0.156 11.08 83 31 34 1.07 1 0.40 0.427 0.583 11.08 12.44 96.613 156.481 113.3 450 PVC 0.60% 220.842 1.389 1.36 71% 1.514 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\4423.Stm-size.dsn MEV2014 Page 2 of 7 M E R I T E G H Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min. Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheet 6.0 m/s max. Project: Port Burwell for I=A/(Tc+B)^C File: 4423 Municipality of Bayham A= 1007.05 n= 0.024 CSP Calc'd by:JEL Ref# MOE Ref Num B= 7.382 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE Date: 16-Jun-16 C= 0.804 Chk'd by: CHT Date: 8-Au -16 5 Year Design Storm Rational Formula: Q=CIA/0.36 Concentration time:tc=ti+tf(minute) Manning Equation: Where: Q:peak flow(L/s) Where: ti:inlet time before pipe(minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000(L/s) C:runoff coefficient tf:time of flow in pipe(minute) D:pipe size(mm) I:rainfall intensity(mm/hr) tf=L/60V S:slope(grade)of pipe(%) A:area ha Min.ti= 10 n:roughness coeffiecient Location Runoff Pipe Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'I S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) (L/s) (m) (mm) (%) NO (m/s) (Min.) (m/s) Strachan Street S of Robinson 83 84 12 0.70 0.40 0.279 0.279 10.00 10.93 101.394 78.648 68.8 375 PVC 0.60% 135.810 1.230 0.93 58% 1.267 84 85 13 0.25 1 0.40 0.102 0.381 10.93 11.44 97.222 102.850 37.8 375 PVC 0.60% 135.810 1.230 0.51 76% 1.359 85 22 0.381 11.44 11.69 95.089 100.593 17.9 375 PVC 0.60% 135.810 1.230 0.24 74% 1.359 Shakespeare St N of Waterloo 4.014 13.59 81 1 29 1 32 1 0.90 0.40 0.358 4.372 13.59 14.26 87.203 1058.978 89.7 900 PVC 0.60% 1402.261 2.204 0.68 76% 2.436 Shakespeare St S of Robinson 94 1 95 1 14 0.74 0.40 0.295 0.295 10.00 11.03 101.394 82.963 84.5 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 1.03 86% 1.546 95 1 20 1 1 0.295 11.03 11.15 96.810 79.212 9.2 375 PVC 0.60% 135.810 1.230 0.12 58% 1.279 Erieus Street S of Robinson 86 87 15 0.55 0.40 0.220 0.220 10.00 10.81 101.394 62.075 66.7 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.81 64% 1.464 87 24 0.220 10.81 10.92 97.737 59.837 6.6 300 PVC 0.60% 74.904 1.060 0.10 80% 1.182 Robinson Street W of Victoria 17 18 16 0.48 0.70 0.334 0.334 10.00 10.48 101.394 94.043 67.6 300 PVC 3.00% 167.491 2.370 0.48 56% 2.441 18 19 17 0.99 0.40 0.395 0.729 10.48 10.84 99.217 200.832 60.8 375 PVC 3.00% 303.681 2.750 0.37 66% 2.956 19 20 18 0.28 0.40 0.111 0.840 10.84 11.21 97.601 227.676 48.4 450 PVC 1.50% 349.182 2.196 0.37 65% 2.349 95 20 0.295 11.15 20 21 19 0.47 0.40 0.187 1.322 11.21 11.87 96.047 352.574 85.6 600 PVC 1.00% 614.012 2.172 0.66 57% 2.237 21 22 20 0.62 0.40 0.247 1.569 11.87 12.44 93.403 407.004 74.5 600 PVC 1.00% 614.012 2.172 0.57 66% 2.334 85 22 0.381 11.69 22 23 21 0.59 0.40 0.235 2.184 12.44 13.10 91.231 553.482 72.0 675 PVC 0.60% 651.117 1.820 0.66 85% 2.056 23 24 22 0.48 0.40 0.192 2.376 13.10 13.76 88.861 586.569 71.9 675 PVC 0.60% 651.117 1.820 0.66 90% 2.083 87 24 0.220 10.92 24 25 23 0.24 0.40 0.094 2.691 13.76 14.17 86.629 647.545 48.5 750 PVC 0.60% 862.341 1.952 0.41 75% 2.157 25 26 24 0.21 0.40 0.083 2.774 14.17 14.55 85.288 657.273 44.7 750 PVC 0.60% 862.341 1.952 0.38 76% 2.167 26 27 25 0.17 0.40 0.068 2.843 14.55 14.88 84.093 664.012 37.9 750 PVC 0.60% 862.341 1.952 0.32 77% 2.167 MacNeil Court 88 89 26 0.92 0.40 0.370 0.370 10.00 10.56 101.394 104.143 53.1 375 PVC 1.00% 175.330 1.587 0.56 59% 1.651 Elizabeth St N of Hannah 88 89 0.370 10.56 89 90 27 0.62 0.40 0.246 0.616 10.56 11.24 98.853 169.192 57.2 450 PVC 0.60% 220.842 1.389 0.69 77% 1.541 90 91 28 1.20 0.40 0., 1.098 11.24 11.83 95.912 292.564 54.3 525 PVC 0.60% 333.125 1.539 0.59 88% 1.747 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\4423.Stm-size.dsn MEV2014 Page 3 of 7 M E R I T E G H Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min. Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheet 6.0 m/s max. Project: Port Burwell for I=A/(Tc+B)^C File: 4423 Municipality of Bayham A= 1007.05 n= 0.024 CSP Calc'd by:JEL Ref# MOE Ref Num B= 7.382 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE Date: 16-Jun-16 C= 0.804 Chk'd by: CHT Date: 8-Au -16 5 Year Design Storm Rational Formula: Q=CIA/0.36 Concentration time:tc=ti+tf(minute) Manning Equation: Where: Q:peak flow(L/s) Where: ti:inlet time before pipe(minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000(L/s) C:runoff coefficient tf:time of flow in pipe(minute) D:pipe size(mm) I:rainfall intensity(mm/hr) tf=L/60V S:slope(grade)of pipe(%) A:area ha Min.ti= 10 n:roughness coeffiecient Location Runoff Pipe Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'I S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) Ns) (m) (mm) (%) NO (m/s) (Min.) (m/s) Hannah Street 90 1 91 1 1.098 11.83 91 1 92 1 29 0.51 0.40 0.202 1.300 11.83 13.02 93.545 337.842 120.0 600 PVC 0.60% 475.611 1.682 1.19 71% 1.834 Victoria Street N of Hannah 5 92 30 0.80 0.40 0.321 0.321 10.00 11.07 101.394 90.342 101.8 375 PVC 1.00% 175.330 1.587 1.07 52% 1.587 91 92 1.300 13.02 92 7 1 1.621 13.02 13.09 89.136 401.342 9.5 600 PVC 1.00% 614.012 2.172 0.07 65% 2.324 Milton Street N of Waterloo 97 28 31 0.68 0.40 0.274 0.274 10.00 11.20 101.394 77.059 87.8 300 PVC 0.80% 86.492 1.224 1.20 89% 1.395 Shakes Bare St S of Waterloo 99 2 9 33 0.47 0.40 0.189 0.189 10.00 10.96 101.394 53.119 78.4 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.96 55% 1.395 Strachan Street S of Waterloo 101 31 60 0.50 0.40 0.200 0.200 10.00 10.92 101.394 56.273 75.7 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.92 58% 1.423 Erieus Street N of Waterloo 86 33 35 0.52 0.40 1 0.210 0.210 10.00 10.79 101.394 59.056 64.7 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.79 61% 1.436 Erieus Street N of Waterloo 102 33 82 0.52 0.70 0.361 0.361 10.00 10.80 101.394 101.594 76.5 375 PVC 1.00% 175.330 1.587 0.80 58% 1.635 Waterloo Street 92 7 1.621 13.09 7 28 36 0.17 0.40 0.069 1.690 13.09 13.50 88.881 417.277 52.9 600 PVC 1.00% 614.012 2.172 0.41 68% 2.334 97 28 0.274 11.20 28 29 37 0.38 0.40 0.153 2.117 13.50 14.37 87.489 514.533 113.7 600 PVC 1.00% 614.012 2.172 0.87 84% 2.443 81 29 4.372 14.26 99 29 0.189 10.96 29 30 38 0.53 0.40 0.213 6.891 14.37 14.90 84.656 1620.401 78.9 975 PVC 0.70% 1875.000 2.511 0.52 86% 2.850 30 31 1 6.891 14.90 15.12 83.053 1589.709 33.7 975 PVC 0.70% 1875.000 2.511 0.22 85% 2.838 83 31 0.583 12.44 101 31 0.200 10.92 31 32 39 0.61 0.40 0.246 7.919 15.12 15.81 82.388 1812.414 101.2 1050 PVC 0.60% 2115.211 2.443 0.69 86% 2.760 32 33 7.919 15.81 15.98 80.411 1768.903 24.6 1050 PVC 0.60% 2115.211 2.443 0.17 84% 2.748 86 33 0.210 10.79 102 33 0.361 10.80 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\4423.Stm-size.dsn MEV2014 Page 4 of 7 M E R I T E G H Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min. Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheet 6.0 m/s max. Project: Port Burwell for I=A/(Tc+B)^C File: 4423 Municipality of Bayham A= 1007.05 n= 0.024 CSP Calc'd by:JEL Ref# MOE Ref Num B= 7.382 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE Date: 16-Jun-16 C= 0.804 Chk'd by: CHT Date: 8-Au -16 5 Year Design Storm Rational Formula: Q=CIA/0.36 Concentration time:tc=ti+tf(minute) Manning Equation: Where: Q:peak flow(L/s) Where: ti:inlet time before pipe(minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000(L/s) C:runoff coefficient tf:time of flow in pipe(minute) D:pipe size(mm) I:rainfall intensity(mm/hr) tf=L/60V S:slope(grade)of pipe(%) A:area ha Min.ti= 10 n:roughness coeffiecient Location Runoff Pipe Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'I S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) Ns) (m) (mm) (%) NO (m/s) (Min.) (m/s) 33 34 40 0.45 0.55 0.247 8.737 15.98 16.56 79.946 1940.210 92.6 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.58 64% 2.857 34 35 8.737 16.56 16.63 78.390 1902.456 11.5 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.07 63% 2.830 Robinson Street N of Wellington) 13 103 41 0.44 0.75 0.327 0.327 10.00 10.81 101.394 92.163 77.1 375 PVC 1.00% 175.330 1.587 0.81 53% 1.603 103 104 42 0.28 0.65 0.179 0.506 10.81 11.17 97.750 137.386 54.5 375 PVC 2.50% 277.221 2.510 0.36 50% 2.485 104 35 0.506 11.17 11.35 96.214 135.228 15.1 450 PVC 0.60% 220.842 1.389 0.18 61% 1.4S8 34 35 8.737 16.63 35 27 43 0.28 0.40 0.111 9.354 16.63 16.88 78.202 2031.897 39.8 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.25 67% 2.870 Outlet 1 @ the Bridge 26 27 2.843 14.88 35 27 9.354 16.88 27 Outlet Totalarea: 26.73 12.196 16.88 16.88 77.557 2627.554 60.4 675 Conc 3.00% 1455.941 4.069 Two pipes in the outlet confi uration 60.4 675 Conc 3.00% 1455.941 4.069 Total 2911.883 90% South of Wellington Street,to Outlet 3 Elizabeth Street N of Wellin ton 105 106 50 1.07 0.50 0.535 0.535 10.00 10.89 101.394 150.570 103.6 375 PVC 1.50% 214.735 1.944 0.89 70% 2.119 Elizabeth Street S of Wellington) 107 108 51 0.72 0.40 0.289 0.289 10.00 11.11 101.394 81.521 94.3 375 PVC 0.80% 156.820 1.420 1.11 52% 1.420 108 109 52 0.75 0.40 0.300 0.590 11.11 12.07 96.484 158.040 80.5 450 PVC 0.60% 220.842 1.389 0.97 72% 1.514 109 106 53 1.78 0.50 0.891 1.481 12.07 12.86 92.612 380.920 79.3 600 PVC 0.60% 475.611 1.682 0.79 80% 1.884 Victoria Street N of Wellin ton 110 8 54 0.93 0.40 0.373 0.373 10.00 11.03 101.394 105.100 98.1 375 PVC 1.00% 175.330 1.587 1.03 60% 1 1.651 Victoria Street S of Wellin ton ill 112 SS1 0.84 0.40 0.336 0.336 10.00 1 10.85 101.394 94.510 85.2 300 1 PVC 1.50% 118.434 1.675 1 0.85 1 80% 1.868 112 113 56 0.56 0.40 0.223 0.558 10.85 1 11.37 97.586 151.334 1 61.2 375 1 PVC 1 1.50% 214.735 1.944 1 0.52 1 70% 2.119 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\4423.Stm-size.dsn MEV2014 Page 5 of 7 M E R I T E G H Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min. Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheet 6.0 m/s max. Project: Port Burwell for I=A/(Tc+B)^C File: 4423 Municipality of Bayham A= 1007.05 n= 0.024 CSP Calc'd by:JEL Ref# MOE Ref Num B= 7.382 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE Date: 16-Jun-16 C= 0.804 Chk'd by: CHT Date: 8-Au -16 5 Year Design Storm Rational Formula: Q=CIA/0.36 Concentration time:tc=ti+tf(minute) Manning Equation: Where: Q:peak flow(L/s) Where: ti:inlet time before pipe(minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000(L/s) C:runoff coefficient tf:time of flow in pipe(minute) D:pipe size(mm) I:rainfall intensity(mm/hr) tf=L/60V S:slope(grade)of pipe(%) A:area ha Min.ti= 10 n:roughness coeffiecient Location Runoff Pipe Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'I S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) Ns) (m) (mm) (%) NO (m/s) (Min.) (m/s) 113 8 57 0.49 0.40 0.195 0.753 11.37 12.20 95.385 199.567 69.2 450 PVC 0.60% 220.842 1.389 0.83 90% 1.590 Milton Street N of Wellin ton 114 9 581 0.63 0.45 1 0.282 0.282 10.00 11.12 101.394 79.455 91.7 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 1.12 82% 1.539 Shakespeare St N of Wellin ton 99 10 59 0.25 0.40 0.098 0.098 10.00 10.66 101.394 27.678 54.1 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.66 29% 1.163 Strachan Street N of Wellin ton 101 11 61 0.25 0.40 0.098 0.098 10.00 10.71 101.394 27.602 58.6 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.71 29% 1.163 Strachan Street S or Wellin ton 115 11 62 1.02 0.40 0.409 0.409 10.00 11.19 101.394 115.251 113.1 375 PVC 1.00% 175.330 1.587 1.19 66% 1.699 Wellin ton Street W of Erieus 13 12 73 0.69 0.75 0.514 0.514 10.00 11.28 101.394 144.761 122.8 450 PVC 0.80% 255.007 1.603 1.28 57% 1.651 Wellin ton Street E of Elizabeth 106a 106 1 74a 1.27 0.40 0.508 0.831 10.00 10.92 101.394 234.107 99.3 450 PVC 1.00% 285.106 1.793 0.92 82% 2.017 Wellin ton Street E of Erieus 105 106 0.535 10.89 109 106 1.481 12.86 106a 106 0.831 10.92 106 8 74 0.53 0.65 0.346 3.193 12.86 g2....20 .83 89.711 795.671 132.0 750 PVC 0.80% 995.745 2.254 0.98 80% 2.513 110 8 0.373 .03113 8 0.753 8 9 75 0.23 0.55 0.126 4.445 13.83 28 86.377 1066.541 59.1 900 PVC 0.60% 1402.261 2.204 0.45 76% 2.447 114 9 0.282 129 10 76 1.16 0.50 0.582 5.309 14.28 10 84.942 1252.650 108.4 900 PVC 0.60% 1402.261 2.204 0.82 89% 2.513 99 10 0.098 10.66 10 11 77 0.66 0.40 0.265 5.673 15.10 15.71 82.443 1299.086 109.7 900 PVC 1.10% 1898.670 2.985 0.61 68% 3.238 101 11 0.098 10.71 115 11 0.409 11.19 1 12 78 0.81 0.40 0.323 6.503 15.71 16.55 80.680 1 1457.4121 122.3 1050 PVC 1 0.60% 12115.2111 2.443 1 0.83 1 69% 2.650 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\4423.Stm-size.dsn MEV2014 Page 6 of 7 M E R I T E G H Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min. Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheet 6.0 m/s max. Project: Port Burwell for I=A/(Tc+B)^C File: 4423 Municipality of Bayham A= 1007.05 n= 0.024 CSP Calc'd by:JEL Ref# MOE Ref Num B= 7.382 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE Date: 16-Jun-16 C= 0.804 Chk'd by: CHT Date: 8-Au -16 5 Year Design Storm Rational Formula: Q=CIA/0.36 Concentration time:tc=ti+tf(minute) Manning Equation: Where: Q:peak flow(L/s) Where: ti:inlet time before pipe(minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000(L/s) C:runoff coefficient tf:time of flow in pipe(minute) D:pipe size(mm) I:rainfall intensity(mm/hr) tf=L/60V S:slope(grade)of pipe(%) A:area ha Min.ti= 10 n:roughness coeffiecient Location Runoff Pipe Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'I S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) Ns) (m) (mm) (%) NO (m/s) (Min.) (m/s) Robinson Street S of Wellin ton 13 14 63 0.62 0.75 0.469 0.469 10.00 11.12 101.394 131.960 106.7 375 PVC 1.00% 175.330 1.587 1.12 75% 1.754 Robinson Street So Brock 125 129 64 0.40 0.40 0.160 0.160 10.00 10.87 101.394 45.199 71.2 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.87 47% 1.300 Robinson Street S of Pitt 129 15 65 0.62 0.50 0.310 0.310 10.00 11.19 101.394 87.297 94.6 375 PVC 0.70% 146.692 1.328 1.19 60% 1.300 15 14 66 0.06 0.75 0.045 0.355 11.19 11.56 96.149 94.920 27.7 375 PVC 0.60% 135.810 1.230 0.38 70% 1.300 Pitt Street E of Erieus 116 117 67 0.56 0.40 0.223 0.223 10.00 10.74 101.394 62.864 74.7 300 PVC 1.50% 118.434 1.675 0.74 53% 1.692 117 118 68 2.03 0.40 0.814 1.037 10.74 11.43 98.038 282.360 89.9 450 PVC 1.50% 349.182 2.196 0.68 81% 2.459 118 119 69 0.50 0.40 1 0.200 1.237 11.43 12.01 95.167 326.932 84.6 525 PVC 1.50% 526.717 2.433 0.58 62% 2.579 119 115 70 0.39 0.40 0.156 1.393 12.01 12.71 92.874 359.400 70.7 600 PVC 0.60% 475.611 1.682 0.70 76% 1.859 115 120 71 0.67 0.40 0.269 1.662 12.71 13.87 90.261 416.784 117.6 600 PVC 0.60% 475.611 1.682 1.17 88% 1.909 Pitt Street W of Erieus 13 14 0.469 11.12 15 14 0.355 11.56 14 120 72 0.66 0.70 0.462 1.286 11.56 12.78 94.614 338.072 123.1 600 PVC 0.60% 475.611 1.682 1.22 71% 1.300 Strachan Street S of Pitt 127 128 1 0.68 0.40 0.273 0.273 10.00 10.90 101.394 76.766 74.2 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.90 79% 1.525 Erieus Street 102 12 83 0.27 0.75 0.203 0.203 10.80 11.51 97.777 55.203 58.1 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.71 57% 1.409 11 12 6.503 16.55 13 12 0.514 11.28 12 120 84 0.88 0.65 0.572 7.792 16.55 17.30 78.410 1697.172 109.8 1050 PVC 0.60% 2115.211 2.443 0.75 80% 2.736 115 120 1.662 13.87 14 120 1.286 12.78 120 121 85 0.79 0.40 0.318 11.058 17.30 18.07 76.491 2349.636 123.2 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.77 78% 2.964 Erieus Street S of Brock 122 121 86 1 0.22 1 0.40 0.089 0.089 1 10.96 1 11.44 1 97.125 23.958 40.0 1 300 PVC 1.00% 96.701 1.368 0.49 25% 1.094 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\4423.Stm-size.dsn MEV2014 Page 7 of 7 M E R I T E G H Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min. Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheet 6.0 m/s max. Project: Port Burwell for I=A/(Tc+B)^C File: 4423 Municipality of Bayham A= 1007.05 n= 0.024 CSP Calc'd by:JEL Ref# MOE Ref Num B= 7.382 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE Date: 16-Jun-16 C= 0.804 Chk'd by: CHT Date: 8-Au -16 5 Year Design Storm Rational Formula: Q=CIA/0.36 Concentration time:tc=ti+tf(minute) Manning Equation: Where: Q:peak flow(L/s) Where: ti:inlet time before pipe(minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000(L/s) C:runoff coefficient tf:time of flow in pipe(minute) D:pipe size(mm) I:rainfall intensity(mm/hr) tf=L/60V S:slope(grade)of pipe(%) A:area ha Min.ti= 10 n:roughness coeffiecient Location Runoff Pipe Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'I S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) Ns) (m) (mm) (%) NO (m/s) (Min.) (m/s) Brock Street W of Erieus 125 129 0.160 10.87 129 121 81 0.58 0.40 0.233 0.393 10.87 12.53 97.500 106.503 122.8 375 PVC 0.60% 135.810 1.230 1.66 78% 1.371 Brock Street E of Erieus 0.273 10.90 128 130 0.273 10.90 11.18 97.344 73.700 20.5 375 PVC 0.60% 135.810 1.230 0.28 54% 1.254 129 121 0.393 12.53 120 121 11.058 18.07 122 121 0.089 11.44 121 130 80 0.46 0.40 0.184 11.724 18.07 18.67 74.627 2430.451 96.5 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.60 80% 2.991 O en Space-Outlet 3 @ the Lake 128 130 0.273 1 11.18 121 130 11.724 18.67 130 131 11.997 18.67 18.73 73.237 1 2440.616 9.4 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.06 81% 1 2.991 131 133 11.997 18.73 18.92 73.104 1 2436.2051 31.3 1 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.20 81% 2.991 133 134 87 0.29 0.20 0.058 12.055 18.92 19.11 72.668 1 2433.4441 30.3 1 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.19 81% 2.991 134 135 88 0.40 0.20 0.081 12.136 19.11 19.36 72.250 2435.708 40.1 1200 PVC 0.60% 3019.943 2.670 0.25 81% 2.991 135 1 123 Total area: 1 25.74 12.136 19.36 19.53 71.706 1 2417.3641 52.7 1 900 1 PVC 1 3.40% 13338.0491 5.247 1 0.17 72% 5.772 F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\4423.Stm-size.dsn MEV2014 Appendix D; Priority Ranking Taub/es MERIT ECH F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx Street From To Category Ex.Condition Total Rank Priority Score Score Score North system Elizabeth N. of William William Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest William Elizabeth Victoria Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Victoria Robinson Newton Local 1 Failed 4 5 9 Medium Milton N. of Newton Newton Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Shakespeare N. of Newton Newton Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Newton Victoria Shakespeare Collector 2 Failed 4 6 3 High Newton Shakespeare Strachan Local 1 Failed 4 5 9 Medium Strachan Newton Waterloo Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Strachan Newton Robinson Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Shakespeare Newton Waterloo Collector 2 Good 2 4 24 High Shakespeare N. of Newton Robinson Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Erieus N. of Waterloo Robinson Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Robinson Victoria Shakespeare Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Robinson Shakespeare Strachan Collector 2 Fair 3 5 9 Medium Robinson Strachan Erieus Collector 2 Fair 3 5 9 Medium Robinson Erieus Bridge Collector 2 Fair 3 5 9 Medium MacNeil Ct Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Elizabeth MacNeil Hannah Local 1 Great 1 2 55 Lowest Hannah Elizabeth Victoria Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Victoria Newton Waterloo Local 1 Failed 4 5 9 Medium Milton Newton Waterloo Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Shakespeare S. of Waterloo Waterloo Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Strachan S. of Waterloo Waterloo Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Erieus N. of Waterloo Waterloo Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Erieus S. of Waterloo Waterloo Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Waterloo Victoria Shakespeare Collector 2 Fair 3 5 9 Medium Waterloo Shakespeare Robinson Trunk 3 Fair 3 6 3 High Robinson Wellington Waterloo Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Robinson Waterloo Bridge/outlet Trunk 3 Fair 3 6 3 High Table D.1: Storm Sewer Network in Port Burwell (North System) F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx Street From To Category Ex.Condition Total Score Rank Priority Score Score South system Elizabeth N. of Wellington Wellington Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Elizabeth S. of Wellington Wellington Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Victoria Waterloo Wellington Local 1 Failed 4 5 9 Medium Victoria Pitt Wellington Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Milton Waterloo Wellington Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Shakespeare N. of Wellington Wellington Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Strachan N.of Wellington Wellington Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Strachan S. of Wellington Wellington Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Wellington Robinson Erieus Local 1 Failed 4 5 9 Medium Lake Shore E of Elizabeth Elizabeth Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Wellington Elizabeth Victoria Collector 2 Fair 3 5 9 Medium Wellington Victoria Strachan Collector 2 Fair 3 5 9 Medium Wellington Strachan Erieus Collector 2 Failed 4 6 3 High Robinson Wellington Pitt Local 1 Failed 4 5 9 Medium Robinson S.of Brook Brook Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Robinson Pitt Brook Local 1 Good 2 3 41 Lowest Pitt Victoria Strachan Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Pitt Strachan Erieus Local 1 Failed 4 5 9 Medium Pitt Robinson Erieus Collector 2 Failed 4 6 3 High Strachan Pitt Brook @ Park Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Erieus N. of Wellington Wellington Local 1 Fair 3 4 24 Low Erieus Wellington Pitt Collector 2 Fair 3 5 9 High Erieus Pitt Brook Trunk 3 Failed 4 7 1 High Brook Robinson Erieus Collector 2 Failed 4 6 3 High Brook Erieus Strachan Trunk 3 Failed 4 7 1 High Park block Brook Outlet Trunk 3 Good 2 5 9 High Table D.2: Storm Sewer Network in Port Burwell (South System) F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx Appendix E; Proposed Stages and Rough Cost Estimate Taub/es MERIT ECH F:\Company Data\Projects\4423\60-Design\CEA\Port Burwell Drainage Study.docx Street From To Priority Stage Approx. Length Budget North system Elizabeth N. of William William Lowest 5 53 $ 80,000 William Elizabeth Victoria Lowest 5 120 $ 190,000 Victoria Robinson Newton Medium 5 298 $ 480,000 Milton N. of Newton Newton Low 4 112 $ 180,000 Shakespeare N. of Newton Newton Lowest 4 107 $ 170,000 Newton Victoria Shakespeare High 3 169 $ 320,000 Newton Shakespeare Strachan Medium 3 107 $ 170000 Strachan Newton Waterloo Low 3 113 $ 180,000 Strachan Newton Robinson Low 4 124 $ 200,000 Shakespeare Newton Waterloo High 3 90 $ 170,000 Shakespeare N. of Newton Robinson Lowest 4 94 $ 150,000 Erieus N. of Waterloo Robinson Lowest 4 73 $ 120,000 Robinson Victoria Shakespeare Low 4 177 $ 280,000 Robinson Shakespeare Strachan Medium 4 160 $ 300000 Robinson Strachan Erieus Medium 4 144 $ 270,000 Robinson Erieus Bridge Medium 4 131 $ 250,000 MacNeil Ct - - Lowest 5 53 $ 80,000 Elizabeth MacNeil Hannah Lowest 5 112 $ 180,000 Hannah Elizabeth Victoria Low 5 120 $ 190,000 Victoria Newton Waterloo Medium 5 111 $ 180,000 Milton Newton Waterloo Low 4 88 $ 140,000 Shakespeare S. of Waterloo Waterloo Lowest 3 78 $ 120,000 Strachan S. of Waterloo Waterloo Lowest 3 76 $ 120,000 Erieus N. of Waterloo Waterloo Lowest 3 65 $ 100,000 Erieus S. of Waterloo Waterloo Low 3 77 $ 120,000 Waterloo Victoria Shakespeare Medium 5 167 $ 320,000 Waterloo Shakespeare Robinson High 3 343 $ 750,000 Robinson Wellington Waterloo Low 3 147 $ 240,000 Robinson Waterloo Bridge/outlet High 3 100 $ 220000 Table E.1: Stage and Cost Estimates by Section (North System) Meritech Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North Suite 202 Cambridge ON N1R 6Z2 t 519.623.1140 f 519.623.7334 Street From To Priority Stage Approx. Length Budget South system Elizabeth N. of Wellington Wellington Lowest 2 104 $ 170,000 Elizabeth S. of Wellington Wellington Low 2 254 $ 410,000 Victoria Waterloo Wellington Medium 2 98 $ 160,000 Victoria Pitt Wellington Low 2 216 $ 350 000 Milton Waterloo Wellington Low 2 92 $ 150,000 Shakespeare N. of Wellington Wellington Lowest 2 54 $ 90,000 Strachan N. of Wellington Wellington Lowest 1 59 $ 90,000 Strachan S. of Wellington Wellington Low 2 113 $ 180,000 Wellington Robinson Erieus Medium 3 123 $ 200,000 Lake Shore E of Elizabeth Elizabeth Low 3 99 $ 160,000 Wellington Elizabeth Victoria Medium 2 132 $ 250,000 Wellington Victoria Strachan Medium 2 277 $ 530,000 Wellington Strachan Erieus High 1 122 $ 230,000 Robinson Wellington Pitt Medium 3 107 $ 170,000 Robinson S. of Brook Brook Lowest 1 71 $ 110,000 Robinson Pitt Brook Lowest 1 122 $ 200,000 Pitt Victoria Strachan Low 2 320 $ 510,000 Pitt Strachan Erieus Medium 1 118 $ 190,000 Pitt Robinson Erieus High 1 123 $ 230,000 Strachan Pitt Brook @ Park Low 1 95 $ 150,000 Erieus N. of Wellington Wellington Low 1 58 $ 90,000 Erieus Wellington Pitt High 1 110 $ 210 000 Erieus Pitt Brook High 1 123 $ 270,000 Brook Robinson Erieus High 1 123 $ 230000 Brook Erieus Strachan High 1 97 $ 210,000 Park block Brook Outlet High 1 164 $ 250,000 Table E.2: Stage and Cost Estimates by Section (South Section) Meritech Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North Suite 202 Cambridge ON N1R 6Z2 t 519.623.1140 f 519.623.7334 MERIT EC I-I Meritech Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North Suite 202 Cambridge ON N1R 6Z2 t 519.623.1140 f 519.623.7334 BYI1 MERIT E C H engineering PPn 'tunity IsPort Drainage Study Municipal Class EA , schedule B Public Information Centre #2 , Presentation to Council September 15 , 2016 Outline Purpose for the study Municipal Class EA Process Review of Alternatives Evaluation of Alternatives Preferred Alternatives Conclusions and Recommendations Q,AYHq+1? MERIT�9CH ll..�' pP +fonity ISYa Purpose for the Study Study was initiated out of the results of the previous study to identify, document and assess the condition of the storm sewers in the Village of Port Burwell . The goal of this current work is to propose an appropriate drainage system for the Village as a whole that will satisfy the needs of the community and the Municipality of Bayham . Through the study alternatives were prepared to address drainage within the system and the study document provides guidance to the Municipality for future storm water works . . Q,AYHq$? MERIT ECH °� Municipal Class EA Process PHASE HASE PHASE 3 ILPPHASE HASE 5 •••.•- r a q}EPNIIFY ALTERNATIN; DEMIFY ALTERNATIVE COMPLETE _ IDEMIFY PROBLEM APPROVED DESIGN CONCEPTS I COMPLETE CONTRACT_ OR OPPORTUNITY SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM 1 ENNRONMENTpL NAY PROCEEDFOA PREFERRED DRAWINGSAMD OR OPPORTUNDY SOLUTION STVDY REPORT RI TENDER DOCUMENTS JL I ENNROMMEMAL ! DETAIL WVFNTORY s STUDY REPORT IESRY P DISCRETIONARY PUBLIC SELECT SCHEDULE — SCNEDUI E A]- OF NATURAL SOCIAL PLACED ON PROCEED TO CONSPROBLET rON OROPO REVIEW {APPEtiOD(Ik —� - ,WO ECONDNIC FUBLiC RECORD CONSTRUCTION AND I PROBLEM OR OF70RTLNRY ^- � _ � I EgylgpNMElIT ^' OPERATION II I NOTICE Or GONPLETNJN �.,1. I IP NO 1 lO RENEW AQENCIE9 _—v � P IM1VENTORY NATURA4 ORDER• _ ANEt PUBL74 ~ A /OETFPNI LI4~AR \OF MASTER PLAN APPROACHI SOCIAL,ECONOMIC MAY PROCEED ALIOTEEMRNIFAY VIME PDACETS KOiNFS COPY OF ENVIRONMEM DN ENYIPONMENT,AND NOTICE Or COMPLETION � MONITOR FOR 19+e 5—Im AATI MNILGATINO MEASURES TOMCE-EADRANCH ENVIRONMENTAL " PROVISIONS AND ORDER COMMITMENTS GRANTED, IDENDFY IMPACT DF PROCEED 1 'ALTERNATIE SOL—ONB WRNIDOAL ON THE ENNNON A MEW,, F AD MmGATNO MEASURES OR ABANDON L LVALUATL ALTERNATIE ROJECT DESIGNS:IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITY TO 1 RE COMMENDED DESIGN REQUEST MINISTER WITHIN 30 DAYS OF NOTIFICAPON 1 TO REQUEST AN ORDER GPPOR EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE FOR U—RB[N.r• I I sOLLINE�IDENIT rrOl.I rsTm 1 �' RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS MIN6T[a 1 s CONSULT RET'IEW � I I _III AGfkCIE3 6 PREVIOUSLY r--- _ 10OAY30T INIERESTEd A INREGA_Y QPTIONAL' NOTIrICA'TION AFFgCTER PUBLIC FOTIfiUL.MMIATIdN'r\ I 6 Et1NMA!REL4liII �..�y�-� �y I Appalaf AM6 PI,eUS MEL �'I �{ V Y I 1 _____________�_ R PRDalaYDlI aICP11MDY r I ANDALTLYMMTNf BDUlT10N-3 T®A[Ir'115Y '1 r — AcaNLmaF SFL3iCT PREFERRED GAD€R• PLIaldO DfSIGN OISCRETIONARY GRANTED, OROEit PUBLIC PROCEED MATTER 6ENIE0 \ 4ONSULTATIDN ASPER RETERRED WAl1OR 3 r ;1 SCHEDULE S TO REVIEW MINISTER'S TO WRWOVT SELECT PREFERRED PREFERRED DIRECTION MEDIATION MINISTER'$ SOLUTION DESIGN OR ABANDON OONDTDN$ PP6IECT r SCHEDULE C REVIEW ENVIROPIAIENTAL 1 I SIGNIFICANCE a CHOICE ---> INDICATES POSSIBLE EVVM e are r. U EB 0.WYRA LW LVE 05 REVIEW AND LDNFIRM I 'INDIVIDUAL �� IND NDICATES PROBABLE EVENTS CHOICE OF$4HEDULE E.A, `A ... D�ACT POINTS PREUNINARY FlNALIMT10. Here � I8 Bw-A:Caiwull OF PREFERRED DESIGN DESN DECISION POINTS ON CHOICE OF SCHEWIE T OPTIONAL AAR71I0191DEA15.S--A,I. MERITECH whom engineering ©spa tIs0,,. Alternatives Alternative # 1 : Do Nothing Leave the existing system in its current condition. Portions are clogged or broken and do not convey flows, portions appear not to have an outlet, and some sewers are located on private property. Alternative # 2: Repair the Existing System This alternative involves designing a system that is within the same alignment, location, and is the same size as the existing system. The sewer capacity would not be increased to carry larger storm flows; sewers would remain within private property and easements may be requested. All outlets would remain in this option. Alternative #3: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using the Existing Outlet Locations This includes increasing pipe sizes throughout the village, with sewers sized to convey the 5-year storm event but maintaining the locations, but not the size, of all the existing outlets. Alternative #4: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, with New Outlets This option involves sizing the storm sewer network for the future needs of the municipality. Increased pipe sizes throughout the village would be required to convey the 5-year storm event. An evaluation of which outlets should remain or be removed - or if new outlets should be added - adds to the completeness of this alternative. MERIT CH ;, ,. engineering Evaluation of t Alternatives Criteria Description CapacityConveyance Storm event that can be conveyed in piped system • Outlet's ability to handle piped flow • Opportunity for development/intensification/growth • Overland flow route Completeness of System Size of the area serviced with storm sewer • Connectivity of the network • Reduced flooding Physical Environment • Impact to Big Otter Creek (construction impact) • Impact to Lake Erie Beach (construction impact) • Water quality • Floodplain Social Environment Location of sewer on private property (easement/acquisition) • Temporary construction impact (noise, dust, detours) • Built heritage • Archeological potential impact Financial • Impact on Capital Budget for construction • Operation and maintenance costs MERIT ECH en ineerin © ty 9 9 pPo"tLjnity Is-jQ4 Preferred Alternative Alternative #4: Replace the Storm Sewer Networks, using New Outlet Locations Size a storm sewer network for the future needs of the municipality. Increase pipe sizes throughout the village would be required to convey a 5-year storm event. Remove storm sewers from private property and relocate to the municipal right of way. The drainage directed to the open ditch would be relocated as much as possible to the right of way. Increase the outlet sizes to Big Otter Creek and Lake Erie to convey the design flows, but would be in the same location. Remove the outlet to the south of the HMCS Ojibwa and the small outlet into the slope along Pitt Street and the outlet to the beach at the end of Robinson Street. Actions Necessary for Implementation Ministry of the Environment and Climate Control Approvals for construction Permit from Long Point Region Conservation Authority for change to outlets Consultation with Ministry of Culture on potential Archeological Study requirements Construction drawings, tender and construction M E R I *in Cr- eeiH air. {y �` �4xtunity Is Alternative #4 - Replace the Storm Sewer Networks , using New Outlets Legend i. Outlet Location H. ER , ■ ■ Drainage Divide Catchmentand C^W7ER dufl•etmber ElldN -� 1 WIL1hM5f _ I BsT I1RW€1-C S� *+ r in- WATERLOO M�WNMI ST� IIP HMCS 1i6a Pms7 2 f -'u --� u J w_ MF MTIF 01 ECH M E R I Tengineering � �<y Aar.wam'1,8 Conclusions / Recom me ndations Drainage Study provides design criteria to be used for storm sewer design Consideration of flooding on private property should be included in the design Priority of work is proposed based on importance of the pipe segment The Municipality should work with the County to stage and implement works on County road s Council should consider the report and accept it for information and implementation Q,AYHq+1? MERIT ECH THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM STATUTORY PLANNING MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL OFFICE 9344 Plank Road, Straffordville, ON Council Chambers Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:30 p.m. —Gregory Underhill Farms Limited PRESENT: DEPUTY MAYOR TOM SOUTHWICK COUNCILLORS RANDY BREYER WAYNE CASIER ED KETCHABAW ABSENT: MAYOR PAUL ENS STAFF PRESENT: CAO PAUL SHIPWAY DEPUTY CLERK/ PLANNING COORDINATOR MARGARET UNDERHILL CLERK'S ASSISTANT BRENDA GIBBONS SIGNED IN ATTENDEES: None 1. CALLTO ORDER Deputy Mayor Southwick called the public meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and asked for those in attendance for this meeting to sign in at the podium. 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF No disclosures of pecuniary interest were declared. 3. CHAIRMAN'S REMARKS ON THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The Chairman stated the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. 4. PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT A. Application submitted by Gregory Underhill Farms Limited The purpose of the public meeting is to consider an application to change the zoning regulations on a parcel of land in the Agricultural (Al-A) to a Special Agricultural (A2) Zone and a Rural Residential Exception (RR- ) Zone. The effect of the by-law will be to permit a surplus farm dwelling a 0.38ha (1.0ac) parcel of land, prohibit livestock on the residential lot and prohibit future residential dwellings on the agricultural lands. 2016 Council Minutes September 1, 2016 5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION None 6. CORRESPONDENCE None 7. OTHER BUSINESS None 8. ADJOURNMENT Pursuant to the Planning Act requirements the Public Meeting is now complete and the Zoning by-law will be considered at the meeting scheduled for September 15, 2016. The regular meeting will now reconvene at 7:33 p.m. MAYOR CLERK THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL OFFICE 9344 Plank Road, Straffordville, ON Council Chambers Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:00 p.m. 7:30 p.m. — Public Meeting — Planning/Zoning —Gregory Underhill Farms Limited PRESENT: DEPUTY MAYOR TOM SOUTHWICK COUNCILLORS WAYNE CASIER RANDY BREYER ED KETCHABAW ABSENT: MAYOR PAUL ENS STAFF PRESENT: CAO PAUL SHIPWAY DEPUTY CLERK/PLANNING COORDINATOR MARGARET UNDERHILL CLERK'S ASSISTANT BRENDA GIBBONS 1. CALL TO ORDER Deputy Mayor Southwick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST & THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF No disclosures of pecuniary interest were declared. 3. REVIEW OF ITEMS NOT LISTED ON AGENDA None 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS Councillor Casier did not win the seed spitting contest this year at Watermelonfest. MP Karen Vecchio was the winner. 5. DELEGATIONS None 6. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING(S) A. Regular Meeting of Council held August 18, 2016 Moved by: Councillor Ketchabaw Seconded by: Councillor Casier THAT the minutes of the regular meeting held August 18, 2016 be adopted. CARRIED 2016 Council Minutes September 1, 2016 7. MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF MOTION 8. RECREATION, CULTURE, TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8.1 Correspondence 8.1.1 Receive for Information 8.1.2 Requiring Action 8.2 Reports to Council 9. PHYSICAL SERVICES — EMERGENCY SERVICES 9.1 Correspondence 9.1.1 Receive for Information 9.1.2 Requiring Action 9.2 Reports to Council 10. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES —SUSTAINABILITY AND CONSERVATION 10.1 Correspondence 10.1.1 Receive for Information A. Notice of Public Meeting re Gregory Underhill Farms Limited Zoning By-Law amendment B. Notice of Public Meeting re 31 Elizabeth Street Proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-Law amendment Moved by: Councillor Ketchabaw Seconded by: Councillor Breyer THAT correspondence items 10.1.1-A— 10.1.1-B be received for information. CARRIED 10.1.2 Requiring Action 10.2 Reports to Council A. Report DS-37/16 by Margaret Underhill, Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator re Consent Applications E63/16, E64/16, E65/16, E66/16 Moved by: Councillor Casier Seconded by: Councillor Ketchabaw THAT Report DS-37/16 regarding Consent applications E63—66/16 be received for information; AND THAT Council recommend to the Elgin County Land Division Committee that Consent Applications E63-66/16, submitted by James Crane, be granted each subject to the following conditions: 1. Grading plan 2. Municipal lot assessment for private septic system 2016 Council Minutes September 1, 2016 3. Water quality testing reports for nitrates and bacteria content meeting the Provincial standards for residential use, as a matter of public health and safety 4. Water quantity testing report meeting the Provincial standards for residential use, as a matter of public health and safety 5. Rezoning of both retained and severed parcels to address the Holding provisions (h 1/h4) 6. $500 cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication fee 7. Purchase of civic number signage 8. Planning report fee payable to the municipality 9. Copy of final survey— paper and digital CARRIED 11. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION 11.1 Correspondence 11.1.1 Receive for Information A. Township of Carlow/Mayo re Bill 171, Highway Traffic Amendment Act B. Town of Lakeshore re Support of Resolution — Debt Incurred from the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Am Games C. Elgin St. Thomas Public Health 2015 Annual Report D. Town of Shelburne Council Resolution re Autism Spectrum Disorder Moved by: Councillor Breyer Seconded by: Councillor Casier THAT correspondence items 11.1.1-A— 11.1.1-D be received for information. CARRIED 11.1.2 Requiring Action A. County of Elgin re Library Facility Leases Moved by: Councillor Breyer Seconded by: Councillor Ketchabaw THAT correspondence from County of Elgin re Library Facility Leases be received for information; AND THAT the Council of the Municipality of Bayham agrees to renewal of the lease for the Straffordville and Port Burwell branches of the Elgin County Library for a term of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022 under section 2.2.1 of the current lease governing use of the facility. CARRIED 11.2 Reports to Council 2016 Council Minutes September 1, 2016 12. BY-LAWS 13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Discussion re Edison Museum (deferred from August 18, 2016 Council meeting) Moved by: Councillor Casier Seconded by: Councillor Ketchabaw THAT discussion of Edison Museum be deferred until the October 6, 2016 meeting. CARRIED 14. OTHER BUSINESS 14.1 In Camera Moved by: Councillor Casier Seconded by: Councillor Breyer THAT the Council do now rise to enter into an "In Camera" Session of Committee of the Whole at 7:14 p.m. to discuss: • Proposed or pending acquisitions or dispositions of land by the municipality or local board CARRIED A. Confidential Item regarding litigation or potential litigation including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board (Ojibwa) 14.1 Out of Camera Moved by: Councillor Ketchabaw Seconded by: Councillor Breyer THAT the Committee of the Whole do now rise from the "in Camera" session at 7:27 p.m. with nothing to report. CARRIED 2016 Council Minutes September 1, 2016 15. BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF COUNCIL A. By-Law 2016-077 Being a By-law to confirm all actions of Council Moved by: Councillor Casier Seconded by: Councillor Ketchabaw THAT confirming By-law 2016-077 be read a first, second and third time and finally passed. CARRIED 16 ADJOURNMENT Moved by: Councillor Casier Seconded by: Councillor Breyer THAT the Council meeting be adjourned at 7:35. CARRIED MAYOR CLERK Municipality of Baybam $AYH NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING CONCERNING A PROPOSED OFFICIAL PLAN and ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT O�PlpOrtunity IS10 ��S IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM APPLICANT: MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM TAKE NOTICE that the Municipality of Bayham has received a completed application for a proposed Official Plan Amendment and a completed application for a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment. AND TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham will hold a public meeting on Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers in Straffordville to consider a proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment under Section 17 and 34 of the PLANNING ACT. THE PURPOSE of the official plan amendment is to change the land use designation on approximately 2023m2 (0.5 acres) of land from the "Institutional" designation to the "Industrial" designation in the Official Plan of the Municipality of Bayham; and the purpose of the zoning by- law amendment is to change the zoning on the same lands from the Institutional (1) Zone to the Urban Industrial (M4) in the Zoning By-law Z456-2003 of the Municipality of Bayham. The subject lands are located on the west side of Elizabeth Street and north of Wellington Street and known municipally as 31 Elizabeth Street, in the Village of Port Burwell. THE EFFECT of the amendments is to permit the repair of boats in the existing building; outdoor storage of boats\recreational vehicles; and the placement of shipping containers for the rental of storage space in accordance with the `Village — Industrial' policies of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Section 23 Urban Industrial (M4) Zone Regulations. ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make a written or verbal representation in support of or in opposition to the proposed amendments. IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham before the proposed official plan amendment is adopted or by-law is passed, the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham to the Ontario Municipal Board. IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham before the proposed official plan amendment is adopted or by-law is passed, the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to add the person or public body as a party. IF YOU WISH to be notified of the adoption of the proposed amendments, or the refusal of a request to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law you must make a written request to the undersigned. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION about this application is now available in the Municipal office. For more information about this matter contact the Municipality at the address, email or website shown below. O. Reg. 175/16, s.1 (13). DATED at the Municipality of Bayham this 24th day of August 2016. KEY MAP MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM All t Margaret Underhill Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator lv.vn',Ill.:T dxA"rTsXf.O(t ST Municipality of Bayham g P.O. Box 160, 9344 Plank Rd. Straffordville, ON, NOJ 1Y0 T: 519-866-5521 Ext 222 "°g F: 519-866-3884 E: munderhill(a_)bayham.on.ca W: www.bayham.on.ca on,,r�,rxr Village of Port Burwell SAY REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �puj'tunity Is�o�► TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Bill Knifton, Chief Building Official, Drainage Superintendent DATE: September 15, 2016 REPORT: DS-36/16 FILE NO. C-07/E09 SUBJECT: PETITION FOR DRAINAGE FROM ROAD AUTHORITY BACKGROUND: This report is to present Council the Petition filed with the Clerk, of the Municipality of Bayham, on August 22, 2016. The petition is for a drainage works for lands owned by the Municipality of Bayham and signed by Bayham's Road Operations Supervisor, Ed Bradfield. The area of concern as stated on the petition is for Lakeshore Line from eastern limit of 55 Wellington Street to South Otter River on north side. Section 4(1) of the Drainage Act provides for a petition for the drainage by means of a drainage works of an area requiring drainage as described in the petition may be filed with the clerk of the local municipality in which the area is situate by: (a) The majority in number of the owners, as shown by the last revised assessment roll of lands in the area, including the owners of any roads in the area: (b) The owner or owners, as shown by the last revised assessment roll, of lands in the area representing at least 60% of the hectarage in the area; (c) Where a drainage works is required for a road of part thereof, the engineer, road superintendent or person having jurisdiction over such road or part, despite subsection 61(5); (d) Where a drainage works is required for the drainage of lands used for agricultural purposes, the Director. The Drainage Act provides that Council must give consideration to the petition and, within thirty days (Section 5.1.a) of the filing, decide whether or not it will proceed. If Council decides not to proceed then written notice of its decision must be sent to each petitioner. A petitioner may appeal to the Ontario Drainage Tribunal if Council decides not to proceed, or if Council does not act on the petition within 30 days. It may be difficult for Council to make a decision on the validity of the petition as it is based on definition of the "area requiring drainage". Initially, the petitioner(s) define this area on the petition they submit, however the area must be defined by an engineer at the "on-site meeting" to determine the validity of the petition. If the Municipality decides to proceed then written notice of its decision must be given to (Section 5.16): (a) each petitioner; (b) the Clerk of each local municipality that may be affected; (c) the Conservation Authority that may be affected; (d) the Ministry of Natural Resources; (e) The Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs. The Municipality must appoint an engineer within sixty days (Section 8.3) of giving notice to proceed. The choice of engineer is the decision of Council. When appointed by Council to prepare a report on the drainage work, the engineer is to file said report within six (6) months (Section 39.1) of the appointment. Following the appointment the engineer must (Section 9.1) cause the Municipal Clerk to send a written notice, specifying the time and place of an "on-site meeting". The notice must be served seven days prior to the proposed site meeting. DISCUSSION: The road allowance along Lakeshore Line near Wellington Street is in need of proper drainage as it is receiving drainage from other properties. This has created adverse conditions of the area and is causing flooding in the village. A legal outlet for the road ditches in this area is necessary, RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Council of the Municipality of Bayham acknowledges the filing with the Clerk of the Petition for drainage works from the Municipality of Bayham's Road Operations Supervisor, Ed Bradfield. 2. THAT Report DS-36/16 regarding the petition for drainage and for drainage improvement be received; 3. AND THAT Council wishes to proceed with this matter and appoints Spriet Associates, Engineers, to prepare a report on the proposed drainage area pursuant to Section 5 and Section 8(1) of the Drainage Act, for Council's consideration. Respectfully Submitted by: Bill Knifton h Chief Building Official CA Drainage Superintendent E I V �r Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Petition for Drainage Works by Road Food and Rural Affairs AUG 2 2 2016 Authority - Form 2 /�rainage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D.17, subs. 4(1)(c) MUNICIPALITY OF BAY6 To: The Council of the Corporation of the ^t 4 of A. Re: Road name and road location (provide description of road or section of road that requires drainage) 1zCS�e �w 5 �1eII�VS4o V.. 5-' . 4.6 � I, �\ Ex,)cl-, as an individual having jurisdiction over (Last, first name) 2 I c l� C,G the above road system for the , e. �./ --( of 4, .�- declare that the road described above requires drainage and hereby petitio under subsection 4(1)(c)of the Drainage Act that this area be drained by means of a drainage works. Organization KS Position Title Signature Date(yyyy/mm/dd) r 2� c,� �- S� Q .r J S o 0 Petitioners become financially responsible as soon as they sign a petition: • Once the petition is accepted by council, an engineer is appointed to respond to the petition. Drainage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D. 17 subs. 8(1). • After the meeting to consider the preliminary report, if the petition does not comply with section 4, the project is terminated and the road authority is responsible for the costs. Drainage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D. 17 subs. 10(4). • After the meeting to consider the final report, if the petition does not comply with section 4, the project is terminated and the road authority is responsible for the costs. Drainage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D. 17 s.43. • If the project proceeds to completion, a share of the cost of the project will be assessed to the involved properties in relation to the assessment schedule in the engineer's report, as amended on appeal. Drainage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D. 17 s. 61. 0175E(2012/08) ©Queen's Printer for Ontario,2012 Disponible en frangais ift ELGIN MAPPING w Legend • Culverts OMAFRA Constructed Drains Unclassified Closed/Tiled Open Drainage Proposed Drains • GPS Catch Basins .� GPS Drains Lagoons Local Arterial �f ,r � Highways J a World Street Map A. � I E �„-..r'� ay, µ. ,� 4 � ��r _�,.� _ Rr I"�a r-„ + i � s �...� R E C I V E pg> b r-w o , K AUG 22 2016 I' �I I � f„.. Notes <N• 0,2 0 0.08 0.2 Kilometers This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current,or otherwise reliable. 0 Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION g. REPORT o� z =- o�,,cy DEVELOPMENT SERVICES lortunity Ism TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Margaret Underhill, Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator DATE: September 15, 2016 REPORT: DS-38/16 FILE NO. C-07 / D13.GREG Roll # 3401-000-002-07500 # 3401-000-002-07700 SUBJECT: Rezoning Application —Gregory Underhill Farms Limited BACKGROUND: Gregory Underhill Farms Limited submitted a rezoning to application to rezone their property at 55970 Chute Line. The property is subject to Consent Application E44/16 granted July 22, 2016 for the purpose of a surplus farm dwelling severance. A public meeting was held September 1, 2016 with no attendees and no public comments received. At the time writing this report no additional applicant or public comments were received. The Purpose of this By-law is to change the zoning regulations on a 28.63ha (70.7 ac) parcel of land, in the Agricultural (Al) Zone to a Special Agricultural (A2) Zone and a Rural Residential Exception (RR-31) Zone in Zoning By-law Z456-2003. The subject lands are located in Part of Lot 18, Concession 3, on the north side of Chute Line and known as 55970 Chute Line. The Effect of this By-law will be to permit a surplus farm dwelling on a 0.38ha (1.0ac) parcel of land, prohibit livestock on the residential lot and prohibit future residential dwellings on the agricultural lands. DISCUSSION The consent application was supported by Council on July 21, 2016 proposing to sever the dwelling as surplus to the farm corporation. The rezoning of both the severed and retained parcels is a condition of the consent. Staff and planner are supportive of the purpose and effect of the zoning amendments as per the recommendation in this report to satisfy the condition of consent. Staff Report DS-38/16 Gregory Underhill Farms Limited 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Rezoning Application July 27, 2016 2. Draft Zoning By-law Z652-2016 RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report DS-38116 regarding the Gregory Underhill Farms Limited rezoning application be received for information; 2. AND THAT Zoning By-law Z456-2003, as amended, be further amended by changing the zoning on the lands owned by Gregory Underhill Farms Limited, described as Concession 3 Part Lot 18 from Agriculture (Al) to Special Agriculture (A2) on the retained lands and from Agriculture (Al)to Rural Residential (RR-31) on the severed surplus farm dwelling portion; 3. AND THAT Zoning By-law Z652-2016 be presented to Council for enactment. Respectfully Submitted by: Reviewed by: Mq(garet Underhill Paul Shipway Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator CAO MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM + P.O. Box 160 --�, Straffordville, Ontario oppo NOJ 1YO unity Is Phone (519) 866-5521 Fax (519) 866-3884 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING BY-LAW OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM This application must be filed with the Planning Coordinator/Deputy Clerk or designate of the Municipality of Bayham along with a cheque for the required amount. The applicant should retain one copy for their records. The information in this form must be completed in full. This mandatory information must be provided with a fee of$2,000 (Zoning By-law Amendment or Temporary Use Zoning By-law) or$1500 (Temporary Use Zoning By-law Renewal)or$1500(Zoning Amendment to Remove Holding Provision). If the application is not completed in full,the application will be returned. UWE, ` ' shall assume responsibility for any additional costs exceeding the deposited amount related to the said application and understand and agree that for payment of said additional costs shall be a condition of this signed application. I also agree to accept ail costs as rendered. Property Owner Property Owner FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATE RECEIVER , / A1IIOUNT RECEIVED tb t F DEEMED COMPLETEi. C� t .FILE NOP ..� ' DATE ADOPTED.BY 00i1NCIt,• t , r� Revised February 2015 Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law Amendment Application Page 2 1. Registered Owner's Name: 1.2 Address: r Phone No. (Home): > 1;-) -7 Business: `X Fax: Email: ci- Lot and Concession(if applicable): Are there any other holders of mortgages,charges or other encumbrances of the Subject Lands? If so provide the names and addresses of such persons. 2. Applicant/Authorized Agent: A.e', Address: e-5 Telephone No.: Fax: Please specify to whom all communications should be sent: Registered Owner Applicant/Authorized Agent 3. Legal Description of the land for which the amendment is requested:Roll# Concession: 3 K,4 Lot: Reference Plan No: Part Lot: Street and Municipal Address No.: What is the size of property which is subject to this Application? Area: m2 Frontage: in Depth: Is in When were the subject lands acquired by the current owner? 4. Existing Official Plan Designation: .,J How does the application conform to the Official Plan? ihfc �s 16fivl a'AA swilts C!VU e C.T I' -e",r I Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law Amendment Application Page 3 5. Existing Zoning By-law Classification: I re, � L I�Ps L(A Q'e Lc U V)-� What are the current uses of the subject lands? JRl V1 t"Ck _J If known,provide the length of time these uses have continued on this property. If there are any existing buildings or structures on the subject lands provide the following information: Type Front Lot Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line Height Dimensions Line Setback Setbacks Setback If known,provide the dates in which each of these buildings were constructed. 6. What is the Nature and Extent of the Rezoning? S t p1 1 I ki✓buq 1 J 7. Why is the rezoning being requested? C uy(t V Ovi owo I-) o�kse Of 5V34 13(own Rot L;a 1',oro ' n�t I C---> LO f 11 1 ) Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law Amendment Application Page 4 8. Does the proposed Zoning By-law amendment implement a growth boundary A ( adjustment of a settlement area? K3 If so, attach separately justification or information for the request based on the current Official Plan policies or associated Official Plan amendment. 9. Does the proposed amendment remove land from an area of employment? If so,attach separately justification or information for the request based on the current Official Plan policies or associated Official Plan amendment. 10. Description of proposed development for which this amendment is requested(i.e.permitted uses, buildings or structures to be erected.(Be Specific) For any proposed buildings or structures on the subject lands provide the following information: Type Front Lot Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line Height Dimensions Line Setback Setbacks Setback 11. Services existing or proposed for the subject lands: Please indicate with a Water Supply Existing Proposed Municipal Piped Water Supply Private Drilled Well ( 1/) Private Dug Well ( ) ( ) Communal Well ( ) ( ) Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law Amendment Application Page 5 Lake or other Surface Water Body ( ) ( ) Other ( ) ( ) Sewage Disposal Existing Proposed Municipal Sanitary Sewers ( ) ( ) Individual Septic System ( � Communal System ( ) ( ) Privy ( ) ( ) Other ( ) ( ) Note: If the proposed development is on a private or communal system and generate more than 4500 litres of effluent per day,the applicant must include a servicing options report and a hydrogeological report. Are these reports attached? If not, where can they be found? Storm Drainage Provisions: f W M t t n!C i ea� �r��I In Proposed Outlet: 12. How will the property be accessed? Provincial Highway( ) County Road( ) Municipal Road—maintained all year(� Municipal Road—seasonally maintained( ) Right-of-way( ) Water( ) If access is by water,do the parking and docking facilities exist, and what is the nearest public road? Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law Amendment Application Page 6 13. Has the subject land ever been the subject of an application under the Planning Act for: f Plan of Subdivision( ) Consent Zoning By-law Amendment( ) Ministers Zoning Order( ) If yes to any of the above,indicate the file number and status of the application. 14. How is the proposed amendment consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2014? R nee s 1"aywN cn►/ASaccx.hon at\cd Stir kAs dwelb",(' (,r... �,Y t?Cam,�d'o�i �ii Yl�-L.� Vr�'�1 C�f'/Yl..�C4 ` 15. Are the subject lands within area designated under any Provincial Plan(s)? If the answer is yes,does the proposed amendment conform to the Provincial Plan(s)? 17. The Owner is required to attach the following information with the application and it will form part of the application. Applications will not be accepted without the following. (a) A sketch based on an Ontario Land Surveyor description of the subject lands showing I/® the boundaries and dimension of the subject lands; �® the location, size and type of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, indicating their setbacks from all lot lines,the location of driveways,parking or loading spaces, landscaping areas,planting strips, and other uses; Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law Amendment Application Page 7 ® the approximate location of all natural and artificial features(buildings,railways,roads, watercourses,drainage ditches,banks of rivers or streams,wetlands,wooded areas,wells and septic tanks)that are on the subject lands,adjacent to the subject lands, or in the opinion of the applicant may affect the application; ® the current uses of the land that is adjacent to the subject land; ® the location,width,and name of any roads within or abutting the subject land, indicating where it is an unopened road allowance,a public traveled road,a private road, or a right- of-way; ® the location of the parking and docking facilities to be used(if access will be by water only); ® theJocation and nature of any easement affecting the subject land. (b) Written comments from the Elgin St.Thomas Health Unit,Long Point Region Conservation Authority and Ministry of Transportation(if applicable). (c) If a private sewage system is necessary,pre-consultation with the Chief Building Official is required about the approval process 18. If this application is signed by an agent or solicitor on behalf of an applicant(s),the owner's written authorization must accompany the application. If the applicant is a corporation acting without an agent or solicitor the application must be signed by an officer of the corporation and the seal if any must be affixed. 19. Additional Information as required by Council 20. If this application is to accommodate the consent of a surplus farm dwelling,please provide the following information: Date surplus farm dwelling was erected: (j n k n o% kA t q t e o f f1 ao p o \l e Ct a Please provide the assessment roll number,location, and zoning of the farm parcel with which the subject lands is being consolidated. 00o jC o I Cn,000 0UC O Municipality of Bayham Zoning By-law Amendment Application Page 8 I/We, 6_1(eq t-In erklil 1` vms LInAl ;ofthe VI IOc ti Name Tow ownship/CityNillage etc. of L4 lti� ,in the county of �, s,� ,do solemnly declare: Municipality Name ounty Name (i) that I/We am/are the owner(s)of the lands described above (ii) that to the best of my/our knowledge and belief,all of the information and statements given in this application and in all exhibits transmitted are true. (iii) that I/we hereby appoint to act as an Agent on my/our behalf in all aspects of this application. And I/We make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing it to be true,and knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if made under oath,and by virtue of the "Canada Evidence Act". DECLARED BEFORE ME at the: /Za, Jul off 1 .1' t_.e t '�"1 i ®'ner[Agent f; f in the County/Region of . :/ this day of �(,r' % / 20 (' Owner/Agent A Commissioner, etc.MARGARET UNI)ER1t1LL,a Commissioner, of& Deputy Clerk of the Corporation of the 714aai P-211OX of Layhact. BARN PART OF LOT 1 FOR 8 PROPOSED SEVERANCE CONCESSION 3 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF BA YHAM r MUNICIPALITY OF -� BAYHAM C0 NC ='J��\� COUNTY OF ELGIN _ -1 PARCEL B p NOT TO SCALE (METRIC) I J r TO AREA OF PARCEL BE RETAI, » A „AGRICULTURAL TO BE SEVERED J r �r�� rl r�\ll 0.38 HECTARES (0.93 ACRES) f I r -�J\J\] ��Jr�� APPROXIMATE r C= LOCATION EEPIN�BED TANK C=jr�JJr AND W 1f '113 !f p ARCEL B APPROXIMA WELL pWELL1NG p ppCEL T jj.s0 LOCATION OF n TO BE RETAINED �� TO BE RETAINED 0 » o RICULJ-up\ ° 00 w PARCEL p„ � � AG ,o BE SE\jERE AGRICUL-�RAL 1 1�2 STOREY N Q O DWELLING (VINYL) Ln O W 23.13 38.74 JN 2.74 (23g•64) (r ��J I o "r BYLAW TOWNSHIP OF BAYHAM ROAD) O S TILE YUMENT PAD L9 3T1) r�f J KIRKLANp REO AS INSTR K I M H U STED SURVEYING LTD. (FORMERLY 1460 REGIS� ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR (SEE BYLAW 30 HARVEY STREET, 11LLSONBURG ONTARIO, N4G 3J8 „AGRICULTURAL, PHONE:519-842-3638 FAX: 519-842-3639 PROJECT: 16-11993/16-12213 REFERENCE: FILE neck l and AMP 27 use, 1{ 6i I65 v V �1y 3Dy)j p�qq 1 0 Wr . t - s o2-0-1 �� ,• u5.9Z A� N 'r9iv'� A'l9j_ - iL J RRR//r••"" M 3� �' y2�•v 1p � - spa.?a,`v[Sr t6Z'� S`r9.it.♦ LV S T m Are• 3xS•�" � a " ;r;ru n �LO,5� j p M r 3 SEE CIA P 32 a fJ� 7 �L 111� 3 a- r f� nr z THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. Z652-2016 GREGORY UNDERHILL FARMS LIMITED BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW No. Z456-2003, AS AMENDED WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary to amend Zoning By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended; THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham enacts as follows: 1) THAT By-law No.Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Section 7.13 Exception — Rural Residential (RR) Zone by adding the following clauses: 7.13.30.1 Defined Area RR-31 as shown on Schedule "A", Map No.11 to this By-law. 7.13.30.2 Minimum Lot Area 0.38ha 7.13.30.3 Prohibited Uses Notwithstanding the regulations of subsection 7.11.1 of the By-law, the keeping of livestock shall be prohibited. 2) THAT By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Schedule "A", Map 11 by changing the zoning from Agricultural (Al)to Special Agricultural (A2) and Rural Residential (RR-31), which lands are outlined in heavy solid lines and marked Al and RR-31 on Schedule "A" to this By-law, which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 3) THIS By-law comes into force: a) Where no notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto, upon the expiration of the prescribed time; or b) Where notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto, upon the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board. READ A FIRST TIME AND SECOND TIME THIS 15T" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016. READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016. MAYOR CLERK SEE SCHEDULE A-tMAP Nc.8 SEE SCHEDULER MAP H0.9 t ,SLOT 10. LOT IT LOT 12 Z _ o LO T13 6 LOT 14 ❑, r� r I'. LOT 15 h t r LOT 16 LOT 17l i 1 ,1 J <!r'br�,��,E. ( }• LOT 18 U3 � 1 i cV Z ,3 d v � w SEE SCHEDULE H .MAP VIENNA A2 _ R Rl!/1`, SEE SCFiEDULC-A This is Schedule"A"to By-law No.Z652-2016,passed the /,S-l'i-day of Sep,2016 SEE SCHEDULE A-MAP No,14 Mayor Clerk MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM Legend SCHEDULE A O ZBLA NORTH MAP No.11 � LPRCA Regulation Lunt 0 3D0 OJO 800 Uetrez ZONING BY-LAW Z456-2003 CONSOLIDATED JAN 8,2016 REPORT 0��5 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES portunity Is�L TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Margaret Underhill, Deputy Clerk/Planning Coordinator DATE: September 15, 2016 REPORT: DS-39/16 FILE NO. C-07 / D10.UNDE16 Roll # 3401-000-003-05301 SUBJECT: Site Plan Agreement— Max Underhill's Farm Supply SPA-05/16 BACKGROUND: A site plan control application was received on May 31, 2016 and deemed complete August 26, 2016 from the Max Underhill's Farm Supply for their property located at 56532 Calton Line, Vienna. The application proposes the construction of two warehouses (each 1860.5 m2) with lot upgrades for parking, access and drainage. The subject land is designated "Industrial" in the Official Plan and zoned Farm Industrial (M1-4) in the Zoning By-law Z456-2003. DISCUSSION: Based on staff review of the site plan approval application and accompanying final drawings received on August 26, 2016, staff concur that it meets the intent of the Official Plan and the requirements of the Zoning By-law. The drainage plan shows the lands will drain to the utility corridor, which is jointly owned by the Municipality of Bayham and the Town of Tillsonburg. The agent for the owner has circulated the drainage plan to the Town of Tillsonburg and indicated to municipal staff there is no concern. At municipal staff's recommendation, a Mutual Drain Agreement between the three parties is required for the execution of the proposed drainage plan. This Mutual Drain Agreement will be presented to Council at a future date after the subject lands Owner and the Town of Tillsonburg have signed. At the time of writing this report, the Agreement does not indicate the amount of the required security deposit as staff is anticipating receiving a works estimate on which to calculate the security amount. The amount will be established by the time the report is presented at the September 15th meeting. Staff recommends approval of the site plan agreement subject to the addition of the security deposit amount. Staff Report DS-39/16 Max Underhill's Farm Supply 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Plan Application 2. Draft By-law 2016-080 - Site Plan Agreement attached. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report DS-39/16 regarding the Max Underhill's Farm Supply site plan agreement be received; 2. AND THAT By-law No. 2016-080 being a By-law to authorize the execution of a Site Plan Agreement between Max Underhill's Farm Supply and the Municipality of Bayham for development at the property known as 56532 Calton Line be presented, as amended with the addition of the security deposit amount, for enactment. Respectfully Submitted by: Reviewed by: Margdref Underhill Paul Shipway Deputy Clerk/Plannin Coordinator CAO AY+r V Elffrl', FILE No. �/%�— C- REC'D: 3lll/e o <y 1A`( 2 0 16 DATE APPLICATIOI4 CdNSIDERED Al'b+'Funity Is�QJ COMPLETE: J..PJ�J f 12rl'a 9 y or WM WA�fll FEE RECEIVED:$ aJ/00 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM �C SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION FORM The undersigned hereby request the Municipality of Bayham to consider a Site Plan Control application pursuant to Section 41 of the Planning Act on the lands hereinafter described. This application is accompanied by a fee of$500($250 fee+$250 deposit for properties with accumulative building area of 150 m2 or less)OR$2000($1000 fee&$1000 deposit for accumulative building area 151 in or greater)by cash or cheque made payable to the Municipality of Bayham. 1.BACKGROUND INFORMATION a) Applicant's Name Dryden, Smith & Head Planning Consultants Ltd. c/o Samuel Head Applicant's Mailing Address 54 Cedar St. N., Kitchener, ON N211 2X1 Telephone Number 519-745-3540 Fax Number 519-745-6960 b) Registered Owner(if other than applicant) Max Underhill's Farm Supply Ltd. c o Andrew Sebok Owner's Address 56532 Calton Line Vienna, ON NOJ 1Z0 Telephone Number 519-866-3632 Fax Number 519-866-3422 c) Location of Subject Land Lot Number(s)Pt. Lots 17/18 Plan No.or Concession 5 Part Number(s) 1 & 2 Reference Plan 11R-9809 911 Address(if any) 56532 Calton Line The subject land is located on the North side of Calton Line between former railway line and Froese Vegetables d) Existing use of Subject property Feed Mill Operation e) Specific indication of proposed uses of land and buildings Fertilizer blending facility, bag warehouse, storage buildings, silos, parking areas for employees, trailers, trucks, sprayers, etc. f) Official Plan Designation Industrial g) Zoning By-law-Existing Zoning Farm Industrial (M1-4) -Requested Zoning N/A 1 2.SITE INFORMATION a)Zoning Provisions REQUIRED PROPOSED Lot Frontage 780.36m 780.36m Lot Depth 722.29m 722.29m Lot Area 12.54Ac(5.Oha) 12.54Ac(5.Oha) Lot Coverage %± Front Yard 7.2m 7.2m Rear Yard 9.Om 9.Om Interior Side Yard 7.5m 7.5m Exterior Side Yard(corner lot) Landscaped Open Space(%) Unknown Unknown No.of Parking Spaces 40t 40t No.of Loading Spaces Width of Planting Strip Varies Varies Driveway Width Varies Varies Handicap Spaces 2 2 Other(Specify) Off-Street Parking and Loading Facilities 40± - spaces are not painted Total number of off-street parking spaces existing on asphalt. Scattered Number of off-street parking spaces throughout the site. proposed(include existing&proposed) Number of off-street loading facilities existing Trucks unload at various Number of off-street loading facilities buildings proposed(include existing&proposed) b) Proposed Building Size: Ground Floor Area of Existing Buildings(s) 4.961 sq m Building 1 - 1860 sq m Ground Floor Area of Proposed Development Building 2 - 1860 sq m Total Ground Floor Area (including existing&proposed) 8,681 sq m Number of Storeys proposed 1 to 1 1/2 Building Height Proposed 30 ft (9 m) ± Total Gross Floor Area Proposed (including existing and proposed) 8,681 sq m 3. COMPLETE AS APPLICABLE: a) MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Landscaped Area sq m Conversion or Addition to Existing Residential Buildings Yes No Amenity and/or Children's Play Area Yes No UNIT BREAKDOWN Type Number of Units Floor area of Unit Type Bachelor One-Bedroom Two-Bedroom Three-Bedroom 2 3. COMPLETE AS APPLICABLE:-(cont'd) a) MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-(cont'd) Other Facilities provided(eg.play facilities,underground parking,games rooms, swimming pool,etc.) b) COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL/INSTITUTIONAL/OPEN SPACE OR OTHER USES (as applicable) No.of New Buildings Proposed 2 + 2 Additions Conversion or Addition to Existing Building Yes ✓ No Describe Addition to main building & workshop Gross Floor Area(breakdown by type of use,eg.-office area,retail,storage, manufacturing area,etc.) Warehouse, tower building, truck wash, addition to main building (Total floor area is 2238 sqm) Seating Capacity(for rest.or assembly hall,etc.) Describe Type of Business Proposed No.of Staff Proposed-Initially In future(5 yrs) Open Storage Required Yes ✓ No Describe type,location,and buffering(if any) See site plan Phasing if any Future warehouse 1860 sqm Describe Type of Use Proposed Feed mill operation No.of Beds(if applicable) Gross Floor Area by Type of Use (eg.office,common rooms,storage,etc.) Landscaped Area See site plan -sqm If residential use proposed as part of,or accessory to commercial/industrial/open space/other use,please specify Type Number of Units Floor area of Unit Type Bachelor One-Bedroom Two-Bedroom Three-Bedroom Dated this 30th day of April 120 r Signature of Owner/Agent Signature of Owner/Agent 1, Andrew Sebok of the County of Elgin in the Municipality of Bayham DO SOLEMNLY DECLARE THAT: All of the statements contained in this application are true and I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing it to be true and knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if made under Oath and by virtue of the Canada Evidence Act. DECLARED before meat the Municipality of Bayham in the County of Elgin this ay April 20 16 Signa�ttre of Owner/Agent S e Roy ea,a C0MMk f W A issioner,Etc. unicipalay of Watedao,f 'Signature of Owner/Agent Dryden,Smith&Head Plann618 ConsutW a(it Samuel Head ExP'uesJuly31,2017,. Attachments: Site Plan Control By-law 2005-061 with Schedule"A"only 3 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2016 - 080 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A SITE PLAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY AND THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM WHEREAS Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, as amended, provides, in part, that, where in an Official Plan an area is shown or described as a proposed site plan control area, the Council of the local municipality in which the proposed area is situate may, by by-law, designate the whole or any part of such area as a site plan control area; AND WHEREAS the Municipality of Bayham has enacted a Site Plan Control Area By-law 2005-061 pursuant to Section 41 of the said Planning Act. AND WHEREAS Section 41 of the said Planning Act, as cited above, provides that no person shall undertake any development in an area designated as subject to site plan control pursuant to a by-law enacted under that section without first having received approval, as the Council may determine, of the following: 1. Plans showing the location of all buildings and structures to be erected and showing the location of all facilities and works to be provided in conjunction therewith and of all facilities and works required under clause (7) (a). AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham now deems it necessary to enter into a Site Plan agreement with Max Underhill's Farm Supply NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Site Plan Agreement between The Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham and Max Underhill's Farm Supply affixed hereto and forming part of this By-law as Schedule "A„ 2. THAT the executed agreement be registered at the owner's expense against the land to which it applies under the Land Titles Registry Elgin # 11. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME this 15t" day of September 2016. READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED this 15t" day of September 2016. MAYOR CLERK SCHEDULE "A" TO BY-LAW 2016-080 SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY Part Lots 17 and 18, Concession 5, Municipality of Bayham 56532 Calton Line, Vienna Roll # 3401-000-003-05301 AND THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM This Agreement made in duplicate this 15th day of September 2016. BETWEEN: MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY (hereinafter the "Owner") Of the First Part AND: THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM (hereinafter the "Municipality") Of the Second Part WHEREAS the Owner is the owner in fee simple of the land situate in the Municipality of Bayham in the County of Elgin and Province of Ontario, being Part of Lots 17 and 18, Concession 5, therein, and more particularly identified and depicted in Attachment "A" attached hereto (and hereinafter referred to as the "Lands" ); AND WHEREAS, in effect, the Official Plan of the Municipality of Bayham designates the entirety of the Municipality as a site plan control area; AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with a Site Plan attached and marked as Attachment "A" hereto (and hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"); AND WHEREAS the Municipality, as a condition of approval of proposed development of the Lands requires the Owner to enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement as contemplated by By- Law No. 2016-047, being the Site Plan Control By-Law enacted by the Council for the Municipality; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration exchanged herein and, further thereto, the sum of two dollars ($2.00) of lawful money of Canada now paid by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, the Owner and Municipality hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. The Owner agrees that no building permit will be available for the development of the Lands until the Plan has been approved by the Municipality and further agrees that work in relation to such development will not commence prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The Attachments hereto and as described below, attached and verified by the signatures of the Parties hereto, are incorporated in and form part of this Agreement: Attachment "A" — Lands/Site Plan, Attachment "B"—Grading and Servicing Plan, and Attachment "C" —Certificate of Compliance. 3. The Parties agree and acknowledge that Attachment "A" (Lands/Site Plan) hereto identifies the Lands which are subject to this Agreement and, furthermore, depicts and details the Plan for development of the Lands, including but not limited to; (a) The location and height of all buildings and structures to be erected; (b) The location of vehicular entrances and exits; (c) The location and provision of off-Street vehicular loading and parking facilities, including driveways for emergency vehicles; (d) Walkways and all other means of pedestrian access; (e) The location and provision of fences, trees and all ground cover or facilities for landscaping the Lands and protecting the adjoining lands and, furthermore, depicts the lighting, including flood lighting, of the Lands and any building or structure to be erected thereon, specifically; i) A chain link fence, a minimum of 1.83m in height, is to be installed 0.05m east of the mutual property line between the Owner and the Utility Corridor jointly owned by the Town of Tillsonburg and the Municipality of Bayham, as depicted on Attachment "A" (f) The location and provision for the collection and storage of garbage and other waste materials. 4. The Owner agrees and covenants that the Lands will be developed, including but not limited to any building or structure that is to be erected thereon, in strict accordance with the Plan depicted on Attachment "A" hereto, subject only to such changes receiving prior approval from the Municipality. 5. The Parties agree and acknowledge that Attachment "B" ("Site Servicing Plan") hereto depicts and details proposed site servicing facilities for development of the Lands, including but not limited to; (a) Lot grading information, indicating overland flow to and from adjacent properties, collection and disposal of surface water and storm water management (if deemed necessary by the Municipality); (b) Location of utilities within the road allowance and site connections to these utilities; (c) Building finished floor elevations; (d) Other information as required by the Municipality. 6. The Owner agrees and covenants that the site development and servicing upon the Lands will be in strict accordance with the Plans depicted on Attachment "B" hereto, subject only to such changes receiving prior approval from the Municipality. 7. The Owner further agrees that: (a) Final grades and elevations will be established to the satisfaction of the Municipality. The Owner will provide proof of final grades and elevations certified by a professional land surveyor or civil engineer prior to consideration of any request for final release of any security held by the Municipality relative to the proposed development of the Lands. (b) All necessary provisions for service connections on-site will be made to the satisfaction of the Municipality. (c) Construction work will be carried out expeditiously, in good and work-man-like manner, in accordance with good trade practices, and, at all times, so as to minimize nuisance. (d) All necessary precautions to avoid dust, noise and other nuisances and to provide for public safety will, so far as possible, be undertaken so as to achieve compliance with all federal, provincial, or other municipal regulations or standards. (e) All necessary care will be taken to see that mud and soil is not tracked or spilled onto any public street and, where such tracking occurs, the street shall be cleaned at the end of each working day. (f) Garbage disposal facilities will be of an enclosed type located and depicted on the Site Plan as attached as Attachment "A" hereto, at all times designed in a manner satisfactory to the Municipality. (g) Unless otherwise provided, all parking lots and walkways will be finished with hot-mix asphalt, concrete or paving stones to the satisfaction of the Municipality and have permanent bumper curbing along all parking areas that abut the limits of the Lands. (h) No topsoil shall be stockpiled on any other portion of the Lands except those lands identified for that purpose in Attachment "A" to this Agreement; provided that all topsoil shall be stockpiled and maintained in a manner which allows for the maintenance of weeds and other noxious plants; and the Municipality may at all times enter the Lands for purposes of inspection of such stockpiling of topsoil and, if necessary, for purposes of maintenance of weeds, the cost of which shall be borne by the Owner and collected either in like manner as municipal taxes or from any security held by the Municipality to ensure performance of all obligations by the Owner in respect of the development of the Lands. (i) Stockpiling of snow will not be allowed on the Lands where it will constitute a hazard as determined by the Municipality. Q) The electrical servicing of the Lands shall be subject to the approval of Hydro One, or any successor utility thereto. (k) During the period of development of the Lands as contemplated by this Agreement, if the Owner fails to take any act required for public safety or convenience, as determined by the Municipality, and upon seven (7) days written notice, the Municipality, in addition to any other remedy at law, may enter upon the Lands and undertake any and all works to correct such failure and thereby reinstate such element of public safety or convenience, the cost of which municipal work shall be borne by the Owner and collected in like manner either as municipal taxes or from any security held by the Municipality to ensure performance of all obligations of the Owner hereunder. (1) The Municipality is at liberty to consider any breach of this Agreement as a violation of By-Law No. 2016-047, being the Site Plan Control By-Law for the Municipality of Bayham, and Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended, thereby constituting an offence pursuant to section 67 of the said Act and, further, entitling the Municipality to seek any manner of remedy or relief as based thereon, including but not limited to the issuance of a stop work order and/or injunction to restrain continuation of such breach. (m)Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver of the duty of the Owner to comply with any other by-law of the Municipality or any other law, whether federal or provincial in nature. 8. The Owner shall be responsible for consulting with Hydro One, or any successor utility thereto, regarding any matters which relate to utility services provided by Hydro One. 9. The Owner shall be responsible for consulting with and obtaining any necessary approval from any and all regulatory body having an interest in or jurisdiction over the development of the Lands, including but not limited to the Long Point Region Conservation Authority and the Ministry of the Environment. 10. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements in relation to fire protection for the building or buildings or structure or structures to be erected upon the Lands to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief for the Municipality of Bayham. 11. The Owner agrees to pay for damages to public property, including but not limited to any municipal drain, ditch, street surface, or storm and sanitary sewer systems, which may occur during the development of the Lands as contemplated by this Agreement. In the event that the Owner shall fail to repair any such damage within thirty (30) days of occurrence, the Municipality may enter upon the Lands and effect such repair at the sole risk and expense of the Owner. 12. The Owner agrees that any and all lighting required for the development of the Lands in accordance with this Agreement shall be installed and maintained so as not to interfere with the use or enjoyment of adjacent properties or with the safe flow of traffic on abutting or adjacent streets, the determination of which interference shall be in the sole discretion and opinion of the Municipality. 13.The Owner shall landscape and maintain plants and groundcover upon the Lands and in strict accordance with the Plans and at all times to a standard acceptable to the Municipality. 14. If the Ontario Building Code requires that an Architect or Professional Engineer, or both, shall be responsible for the field review of any new building or structure or extension thereof as contemplated by this Agreement, then the Owner shall not occupy or use or permit occupation or use of, any such building or structure or extension thereof until after an Architect or Professional Engineer has delivered approval thereof to the Municipality by a letter addressed to the Municipality and signed by the said Architect or Professional Engineer and certifying that all construction and/or services on or in the Lands, including any such building or structure or extension thereof thereon as required for the development or redevelopment of the Lands have been installed and/or constructed in a manner satisfactory to the Architect or Professional Engineer. 15. The Municipality, through its servants, officers, and agents, including its Chief Building Official, Fire Chief, and Municipal Engineer, may, from time to time and any time, enter upon the Lands and/or any building or structure being erected thereon to inspect; (a) the progress of the development upon the Lands; (b) the state of maintenance as required by this Agreement; (c) compliance with any and all laws, whether Federal, Provincial, or Municipal, including any and all by-laws for the Municipality and more particularly including By-Law No. 2016-047 as Site Plan Control By-Law; and, (d) compliance with this Agreement. 16. In the event of any servant, officer, or agent of the Municipality determining, upon inspection of the Lands and any building or structure erected thereon, that the development is not proceeding in strict accordance with the Plan, and specifications filed, that servant, officer, or agent shall forthwith place a notice requiring all work upon the Lands to be stopped and, furthermore, forward, by registered mail, a copy of such notice to the Owner at his, her, or its last known address and the Owner shall forthwith correct the deficiency in relation to which that notice relates or, alternatively, appeal to the Council of the Municipality of Bayham as hereinafter provided. 17. In the event of any servant, officer, or agent of the Municipality, having inspected the Lands or any building or structure being erected thereon in accordance with this Agreement, be of the opinion that the state of maintenance of such Lands, building, or structure is unsatisfactory, such servant, officer, or agent shall forthwith forward a notice detailing the particulars of such opinion and the basis therefor, by registered mail, to the Owner at his, her, or its last known address and the Owner shall forthwith correct the deficiency giving rise to that opinion of unsatisfactory maintenance or, alternatively, appeal such opinion and the need for correction to the Council of the Municipality of Bayham as hereinafter provided. 18. In the event that the Owner should disagree with the opinion of the servant, officer, or agent of the Municipality as to the state of compliance and/or maintenance, such Owner shall appear before the Council of the Municipality of Bayham, which Council, after hearing the details of the alleged deficiency and hearing the response of the Owner, shall express its opinion as to whether the maintenance of the lands, building, or structure is satisfactory and which decision shall constitute a final determination of the issue. 19. In the event that the Owner shall fail to obey a stop work order issued pursuant to section 16 above, the Owner acknowledges and recognizes the right of the Municipality to apply to a Court of competent jurisdiction in the Province of Ontario for appropriate relief, including but not limited to an injunction restraining continuation of work upon the Lands. 20. In the event that an Owner shall fail to correct a deficiency after notice is given pursuant to sections 16 or 17 above and which notice the Council of the Municipality of Bayham subsequently determines is correct in accordance with section 19 above, the Council of the Municipality of Bayham may by by-law direct, on default of the matter or thing being done by the Owner and after two (2) weeks written notice to the Owner as delivered by registered mail to the last known address of the Owner, that such matter or thing be done by or on behalf of the Municipality, at the expense of the Owner, which expense may be recoverable by action, as municipal taxes, or as drawn from and paid by any security deposit with the Municipality as security for full performance of all obligations by the Owner in respect of the development contemplated by this Agreement. 21. The Owner further acknowledges that any contravention of any provision of this Agreement will constitute a contravention of By-Law No. 2016-047 for the Municipality of Bayham, being the Site Plan Control By-Law, as enacted pursuant to section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, and, among other methods of remedy or relief, is subject to prosecution and penalty as provided for in section 67 of such Act. 22. Unless otherwise authorized, in the event that the Owner wishes to revise the development as described in and depicted in Attachments "A" and/or "B" attached, he, she, or it shall make application to the Council of the Municipality of Bayham for reconsideration and approval and, furthermore, the Owner agrees that construction shall not proceed so as to implement any such revision until approval is given by such Council or, alternatively and on appeal, the Ontario Municipal Board pursuant to the procedure set forth in section 41 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, c. P.13, as amended. 23. The Owner agrees to pay to the Municipality all administration costs incurred in connection with the preparation and/or implementation of this Agreement, including all legal, engineering, and inspection costs. 24. Upon execution of this Agreement and as contribution to capital charges, the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, in cash or by certified cheque, the amount of _NIL Dollars and Cents ($ 0 ). 25. Upon execution of this agreement and as contribution to Site Plan Review expenses, the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, in cash or certified cheque, the amount of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00). 26. Before commencing any of the work contemplated herein, the Owner shall supply the Municipality with a Liability Insurance Policy, or acceptable proof thereof, providing coverage to a minimum amount of $ 2,000,000 per occurrence, and in a form satisfactory to the Municipality, thereby indemnifying the Municipality from any loss arising from claims for damages, injury, or otherwise, in connection with the work to be undertaken upon the Lands and for which approval contemplated by this Agreement is granted. The said policy of insurance shall be provided at the time of execution of this Agreement and shall remain in force until the development contemplated herein is complete and all required documentation in evidence thereof has been filed with the Municipality. 27. The Owner hereby identifies the intended completion date for the development contemplated by this Agreement as on or before September 15, 2017. The Parties agree that it is a responsibility of the Owner to arrange for completion of the development contemplated by this.Agreement on or before such date and, furthermore, to apply for any extension of and from such date by no later than sixty (60) days prior to such intended completion date. 28. As security for the performance and completion of all works required by this Agreement, the Owner shall provide the Municipality with a Letter of Credit, in the amount of To Be Determined Dollars and Cents ($ ). The said Letter of Credit will be based on the estimated cost of alterations to public property, roadways, curbs and gutters and drains, and any repairs for damages to public property, roadways, curbs and gutters and drains, plus all site- specific components as identified by the Site Plan and Site Servicing Plan, attached as Attachments "A" and "B", which are approved under this Agreement. The amount of the Letter of Credit shall be established by the Municipality. The irrevocable Letter of Credit will be issued by a Chartered Bank or other institution acceptable to the Municipality and provide specific reference to this Agreement and provide for the value thereof to be payable to the Municipality at any time or, in part, from time to time, upon written notice from the Municipality. The Letter of Credit shall be provided by the Owner to the Municipality at the time of execution of this Agreement and shall remain in force, until twelve (12) months after completion of the development contemplated by this Agreement, including but not limited to production of all documentation required for evidence of such due and proper completion of the Development. 29. This Agreement and the provisions thereof do not grant to the Owner, or any person acquiring any interest in the said Lands, any rights against the Municipality with respect to the failure of the Owner to perform or fully perform any of his, her, or its obligations under this Agreement or any negligence on the part of the Owner in relation to the Performance of any obligations required by this Agreement. 30. In the event that construction on the Lands has not commenced within the one (1) year from the date of registration of this Agreement against title to the Lands, the Municipality may, at its option and on one (1) month written notice to the Owner, declare this agreement to be terminated, subject to renegotiation at the option of the Municipality. In the event that the Agreement is terminated as set forth above, the Owner agrees that construction on the Lands as contemplated by this Agreement will not be commenced or continued until such time as the terms of this Agreement, at the option of the Municipality, have been renegotiated. 31. Following completion of the development of the Lands in accordance with the Plans contemplated by this Agreement and attached as Attachments "A" and "B" hereto, the Owner shall prepare, sign, and deliver to the Municipality a Certificate of Compliance in the form and of the content set forth in Attachment "C" hereto, by which Certificate the Owner shall confirm that all elements of this Site Plan Agreement have been completed in accordance with the terms hereof and the provisions of By-Law No. 2016-047, being the Site Plan Control By-Law for the Municipality. 32. The Owner agrees that he, she, or it will not call into question, directly or indirectly and in any proceeding whatsoever in law or in equity or before any administrative tribunal or court, the right of the Municipality to enter into this Agreement or to enforce each and every term, covenant, and condition herein contained and, furthermore, acknowledges that this provision may be pled as an estoppel as against the Owner in any such case. 33. The Owner agrees on behalf of himself, herself, or itself, including their respective heirs, executors, ministries, and assigns, to save harmless and indemnify the Municipality from all losses, damages, costs, charges, and expenses which may be claimed or recovered against the Municipality by any person or persons arising either directly or indirectly from any action taken by the Owner in accordance with this Agreement. 34.All facilities, works, and other matters required by this Agreement shall be provided and maintained by the Owner at its sole risk and expense but at all times to the satisfaction of the Municipality in accordance with all standards applied by the Municipality and, in default thereof and without limiting any right or claim to remedy or relief as available to the Municipality, the provisions of section 446 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, shall apply. 35. This Agreement shall be registered, at the expense of the Owner, against title to the Lands and the Municipality shall be entitled, subject to the provisions of any statute of the Province of Ontario, including but not limited to the Registry Act and/or Land Titles Act, to enforce its provisions against the Owner as named herein, including any successor in title thereto. 36. This Agreement enures to the benefit of and is binding upon the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement by their hands and seals or under cover of duly authorized officials at Bayham, Ontario this 15t' day of September 2016. Signed, Sealed, and Delivered ) In the presence of ) MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY Name: Position: I have authority to bind the Company THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM Mayor— Paul Ens Clerk— Paul Shipway We have authority to bind the Corporation LOT 18 CONCESSION 5 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF BAYHAM fa +Nc Soa.m nA nxx .� 6 f� g a a s a 1 ! E F` ,,RR''I-11,E 6'CH IN LIN D F CE + + ea .� {. 2 MT.OD SJ.BSA M>AO e °"^'8 .Fa Ea y i d 2T d oil yf STAGE 2 LL f "rrRmc urw w Oo � FUZE yea WAREHWSS"a gpATR f f � � mex 1aRD.sm• R .{ F 2 {a fWR Iwr[ rRocMRMxr rc a a ".a { E F.21T.z0 e SS�o, W' d� 1 { f" a � � f FIRE ROUTE 1 d#y'Y, 1 a °r•30om'f.n:` y >ie.>p �4 "M %4 aSTAGE 1 ` --._../j%;';� AM r?,T.3,F '� w +k•�� F � 5 PROPOSEp WAREHOUSE SW POND Ty 0 MAX UNDERHILL-FARM SERVICES °� -""-"a d I F rm.m •�>o-. SITE PLAN \ / i EXISTING SITE ! i SITE STATISTICS xE« /4 ZONING REGULATIONS M1 Il mry W� } %��/� w� I` ± v 3❑ I��IF,�yIII�\ M14-FARM INDUSTRIAL ZONE O _ � STORAGE - 2 FORMER FUkL UST CDNTAINERS a,.anr�rRomo[D .Tsm p� COMMERCIAL .—•\.�._— — n6iavu mmuax m T 5 \ \ �I/sE AS) O \ ry • o '. .awti rn r.om MAIN Runnwc \ w\I D I sEOD \ NOTES oc RAIN \\ pIAYELI WAREHOUSE 2533 -DC ly BED O 1 rvc y I I i G l \ rwui Ory ear,iox curt x rvr uuu assrowel s AM _ a a \\I R S .e / I `/ an•vc. KEY MAP g 5 j U . ! iOWFR ro u.nvs. \YP�,OP S Gi _ AST. I I GENERATOR \ o'% SHED 10 DLSICN� �) 1 PSUBROPERTYECT ' ' //�� / /'"� 1 PROPER ° \J v FUEL AST _ / OM1.OY00'W I j1 I 9.90im — / /I \N r210O 207.n43m 1 ' DRAINAGE DITCH �� oAf_�� DRAINAGE DITCH �I I CALTON LINE (COUNTY LINE 45) 2.5 1 .15J' DeR n T AGRICULTURALw zo,e wTc xucusr Rn m `�"w'x'°°ru:i•ao snE real SOURCE:GRADING AND SERVICING PLAN,PREPARED BY K.SMART ASSOCIATE LIMITED a®eaa mraP..Ra w..R�aLT,n,.,lae aand"aaw sew n �a.a,."aa '• .,..,..^/'SITE !»- I V �/ br �s " ter K w.aa a.P r mP.o m NeooeuMxara t I'BM I.:*'' H/D ) �V�� T.laal Nw ro�'rs,�iwe1¢Mn Lsaaul�ricwr,a¢�s�ivmea >R eWnI2An FAa v�„�,� � ��//P � ucr waa.m.mrum�w art ww.aerx a wn rw�nxc mxrwn Lro. Mee MOM Na"s ro e[msaueies As nsum"rwt uuf m wm,a aulnrr mimes ra � _ a¢ro FsaysgP mn worm amrwa ws,m I I M,,p V � ,�[ILR,I rve:wArm�wA m a can mWro dNOErt rax.m sass uo,w1,nc ua>}..�.Detsr FaE K LEG= _� • t'' k ^� - h2 ." seweiEs wva Rmi 4`F.F. �� \ L,•` 9• � °' / �? [g TT/\\ *,�,f `.�• •2t>.DS msmc flEv"nq `�` ems ama.A waa (I MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY LTD. 'Q {" 38332 CALTON LINE VIENNA - wRv.Aww aaaw z " 8 GRADING AND SERVICING PLAN K.SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED CONSULTIND ENmNFFRS AND PLANNERS ..A )e. E�nNC 9>F SY:Sa a.` OA2 u4 L 2m0 SHEET oaoao w a >W 1 OF 1 rac n> �a•• \\er+\eela�R01a\tY2LW.nM�Sff PI.eX r2xeaa 91E P1N1 t—2)2!-Avy-le ztSSl w ATTACHMENT "C" CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: Municipal Address: Owner: This document serves to certify that the Development project on the afore-noted Lands has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Site Plan Agreement between the undersigned, as Owner, and the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham as dated September 15, 2016, and as authorized by By-Law No. 2016 - for the said Municipality of Bayham. The undersigned makes this certification declaring it to be true and correct and as if made under oath. Dated at , Ontario this day of , 20_. Witness Signature Name of Owner (Print) Address of Owner(Mailing) Telephone Number Long Point Region Conservation Authority 17 quit- gy Ob o e' r i s r, _ i + \ 1 ..r y Yes i IJc- er, Mid -Year Review 4 •1 _ ' www.lprca.on.ca ,- CONTRIBUTING TO PROTECTING LIFE HEALTHY WATERSHEDS AND PROPERTY The Long Point Region Conservation Authority (LPRCA) As part of its mandate, the LPRCA reviews development proposals submitted to municipalities within or is your local, community-based environmental agency adjacent to hazard lands and natural areas.We also regulate development in and around environmentally dedicated to protecting, restoring and managing the natural sensitive areas such as floodplains, wetlands, shorelines, watercourses and steep slopes that are susceptible to resources in our watershed. flooding and erosion. As one of the 36 conservation authorities legislated by Planning and Regulatory Services staff works with our watershed constituents and municipal partners to LPRCA2016 Directors the Ontario Conservation Authorities Act of 1946, we ensure that development proceeds in such a way that minimizes risks to life and property,while ensuring are governed by a board of directors appointed by our 8 that the natural features of the watershed are protected.This provides the opportunity for LPRCA to work NorfolkChair - Michael Columbus member municipalities. with our watershed constituents to foster safe and responsible development. Vice Chair- Dave BeresThe LPRCA's board of directors set a dynamic and forward- 2016 PLANNING SERVICES NUMBERS looking course for the Authority through the development LeroyBartlett Haldimandof the 2014 - 2018 Strategic Plan.The Plan focuses on five Municipality Permits Municipal ..ug Brunton Norfolk County key goals: Issued Plans Reviewed Amendments Planning Reviews Robert ■ Protect life and property from natural hazards Bayham 3 Roger Geysens Norfolk County ■ Maintain and enhance watershed health HaldimandCraig Grice County Brant 7 1 Noel Haydt Norfolk County ■ Connect people to the watershed through recreation David Township of and education Haldimand 23 1 3 John Scholten Township . ■ Maintain an organization committed to teamwork, Malahide 1 Tom Southwick Municipality of Bayharn & positive change and excellence Norfolk 60 2 1 22 Township of •- ■ Deliver value and innovation to watershed stakeholders Norwich 2 2 Long Point Region Conservation Authority delivers services South West Oxford 1 and programs that protect and manage water and other Tillsonburg 3 �n�L- �'",, natural resources.These efforts are done in partnership TOTALS -A .A C, 4-}2G�1 with municipal, provincial and federal governments, local (to June 30th, 2016) 100 3 1 28 Tca _5UUX' landowners and other organizations—all at a shared cost well below what they would pay on their own. 50% increase in planning applications over 2015 M,55 This factsheet is a snapshot of what has taken place Mid-Year Highlights: C>L/.r ery ivy- within the watershed during the first six months of 2016. Prove 5 I In addition to the highlights provided, staff worked on ■ Provided input on 32 municipally circulated Planning Act applications P P ongoing projects and responded to numerous public and ■ Issued 100 permits for work under the Development, Interference with Wetlands and P r25�ar �. agency inquiries. Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation ■ Working with municipal staff and conservation authority partners to update memorandum of understanding for municipal plan review services in Haldimand, Norfolk and Oxford ■ Increased permit and planning fees in an effort to meet 60% cost recovery goal ■ Provided new hazard line mapping for input into Haldimand County Official Plan update 0 Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 PROTECTING LIFE ENHANCING AND PROPERTY WATERSHED HEALTH Long Point Region Conservation Authority provides a comprehensive Flood Forecasting and Warning LPRCA has decades of experience enhancing and restoring natural areas and leading successful stewardship System to alert residents in a timely manner of high water and flood events. Effective flood forecasting projects.This leads to direct changes on the landscape for cleaner water, healthier habitats and more resilient services help to minimize damage and public safety risks during flood events. watersheds.A number of cost-sharing and technical assistance programs are available to landowners in the The system is supported by data collected at 10 stream flow gauges and 3 precipitation gauges as well as Long Point Region watershed. data collected at 5 snow survey sites. Snowpack measurements, along with information on stream levels and weather forecasts, provide detailed information on the flood potential in the watershed. LPRCA monitored On the ground highlights: runoff events as they progressed through the watershed this spring. ■ Worked with 10 local landowners to create 11 new areas of wetland habitat that will help to reduce The data collected from the watercourse and precipitation gauges also support the Low Water Response sediment runoff to streams and Lake Erie and increase biodiversity Program for the Long Point Region watershed. LPRCA is responsible for monitoring water levels and issuing low water warnings when needed.Watershed conditions in the first half of 2016 were such that no low water ■ More than 65,000 trees were planted for and by landowners declarations were issued. ■ Supported expansion of ALUS across Elgin County ■ Received ALUS funding to undertake 1 project in Elgin and 3 projects in Norfolk Mid-Year Highlights: ■ Provide technical advice and tree planting support to ALUS Norfolk and Elgin ■ Issued 2 watershed condition statements to local emergency management coordinators, ■ Great Lakes Guardian Community Funding secured in support of Lake Lisgar in Tillsonburg and municipalities and media dune restoration on property in Norfolk County ■ Provided support to municipal emergency management planning ■ Secured funding through Environment Canada's National Wetland Conservation Fund to support ■ Measured snowpack at 5 survey sites three times between January and April 2016 creation of 6 wetlands and the spraying of 60 acres of Phragmites in the second half of 2016 ■ Working on critical maintenance and safety issues at dams ■ Worked with Norfolk Environmental Stewardship Team to enhance watershed habitat ■ Completed safety assessment for Teeterville dam ■ Supported local efforts in regards to implementing Drinking Water Source Protection Plans ■ Installed safety signs at 6 water control structures ■ Assisted Bayham, Brant and Norfolk to delineate drinking water threats and update databases Leveraged $63,396 of grant funding to MAINTAIN 1 ■ 2 IN TOWNSHIP OF NORWICH COMPLETED support projects that improve water quality • • restore habitat CONTROL STRUCTURES 11 IN NORFOLK COUNTY Wetlands 1,yharn I PROGRAM PROJECTs 3 Elgin Haldimand CreatedNor-folk 8 0 Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 0 MONITORING WATERSHED HEALTH Clean water is essential for healthy families and communities. We rely on clean water for drinking, farming, fishing and recreational activities. Good water quality promotes a diverse and healthy aquatic ecosystem. Healthy water bodies support local tourism, business activities and municipal economies. `` - r ` LPRCA'S Healthy Watershed Services team collects, monitors and analyses watershed information. k, Groundwater and surface water monitoring information supports decision-making on Permit-to-Take-Water - applications, low water response and drinking water source protection. Understanding our watershed helps us to better manage and protect our resources. a • • Watershed Monitoring Highlights -1 Installed 28 temperature data loggers on area watercourses to monitor summer temperatures: . Bayham - 1, Haldimand- 1, Norfolk- 22, Norwich - 4 ■ Collected surface water quality samples twice as part of Lynn River Monitoring project for Norfolk County ■ Sampled surface water quality three times for the Big Creek Monitoring project on behalf _ k of Norfolk County sue'"; ■ Collected 2 of seven scheduled water samples at a site in Norfolk as part of an on-going provincial pesticide monitoring project Forests are important parts of a healthy watershed because of their role in the hydrological cycle.Trees make subwatersheds more resilient to climate change's heavy rainfall, irregular storms and unseasonal precipitation. ■ Conducted benthic macroinvertebrate community sampling at 18 sites Forests also provide habitat for many plants and animals.They also clean the air and reduce erosion along ■ Inspected 4 lamprey barriers on behalf of the federal government: Bayham-1; Norfolk- 3 riparian areas. ■ Monitored water quality throughout the watershed as part of the Provincial Groundwater Each year, Long Pont Region Conservation Authority, landowners, and municipalities plant tens of Monitoring Network and Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network thousands of trees to improve forest conditions in this watershed. Planting trees in our communities has many economic, environmental and social benefits. LPRCA works with many partners to offer tree planting subsidies for property owners through its Private Landowners Tree Planting Program. 2016 Reforestation Highlights: Surface9 water quality • • ■ Planted 65,023 trees across the watershed—creating 81 acres of future forests - monitoring sites monitoring sites ■ 48 rural landowners participated in spring tree planting program ■ Worked with Norfolk Environmental Stewardship Team to plant selected sites ■ Planted 75 trees for Township of South West Oxford's Trees for Roads Program ■ Coordinated planting plans and tree planting for 2 community planting events in Tillsonburg and one in Norfolk County ■ Participating on the Reforest Oxford Committee 0 Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 O 2016 SPRING TREE PLANTING CONNECTING Municipality Number of Trees Planted Bayham 22,091 PEOPLE Brant 650 • • • • • • • • • . TO Haldimand 3,420 • • • THE Malahide 0 . • . • • Norfolk 31,381 ' WATERSHED Norwich 4,685 ' ' South West Oxford 1,825 • • • _ • _ Tillsonburg 971 • TOTAL 65,023 2016 Forestry Program Highlights: ■ Own and manage more than 2,778 hectares (6,864 acres) of working forests ■ 100 acres in Brant County were marked for future harvesting - — ■ Surveyed ground cover on slightly less than 2720 acres to establish species composition—prism - cruised 80 acres in Brant; 41 acres in Haldimand; 2480 acres in Norfolk; 118 acres in Norwich - ■ Ensured that sensitive species are not impacted when forest management activities are carried out by - - having an ecologist survey one forest tract in Norfolk and another in Haldimand ■ Maintained 30 year agreement with Ministry of Environment and Climate Change's (MOECC) — research project to monitor long-term effects of environmental stresses on the health of Ontario's hardwood forests _ ■ Continued support of research projects in South Walsingham Sand Ridges that monitor - _ _ landscape responses to climate change and other environmental stresses -- ■ Issued permit to MOECC to sample pollinators on LPRCA property - -- ■ Continued support to Natural Resources Canada's research study on effects of larval endoparasitoid on Emerald Ash Borer s t - ■ Provided forest management services to the Town of Tillsonburg Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 CONNECTING PEOPLE Over the first half of 2016, LPRCA has connected directly TO THE WATERSHED with thousands of people: ■ 2,811 students in 98 classes took part in conservation and heritage education programs at Backus ■ Reached approximately 2,400 students at Children's Water Festivals in Brant and Haldimand Lands owned by Long Point Region Conservation Authority are an important part of the land available for ■ Hosted 4 outdoor public programs at Backus drawing 250 people recreation in the watershed.A wide range of recreational activities are available on these lands including ■ Partnered on a new"Earth Day" fundraising event for Camp Trillium swimming, canoeing, hiking, bird watching, camping, fishing and hunting. ■ Maintained partnership agreement with Norfolk County Community Services Department for LPRCA owns over 11,000 acres (4,450 ha) of land that includes five developed conservation areas that use of Waterford North CA provide local communities with affordable recreation, education and tourism opportunities. ■ Honoured artist Vic Gibbons in April for his support of outdoor education ■ Met with Minister of Natural Resources and Forests during Conservation Ontario's Queen's Park Day ■ Briefed provincial and municipal representatives at ROMA ■ Member of the Province's Conservation Authorities Act Review Advisory Team LPRCA'S LAND HOLDINGS With 689 campsites and 368 seasonal campers, LPRCA's five campgrounds provide a significant contribution to the local economies while providing employment opportunities for over 40 contract and seasonal staff. Students will gain work experience this summer with the Conservation Authority's corporate services, OXFORD COUNTY community relations, field services and healthy watershed departments. Norwich: 750 acres COUNTY OF BRANT Conservation Lands Activities: SW Oxford:410 acres ■ 5 revenue-producing conservation areas opened for 2016 season in May HALDIMAND COUNTY ■ Completed campground water system upgrades at Backus Heritage CA ■ Made several improvements at Haldimand CA, including renovating the gatehouse, upgrading campsite hydro service and removing hazardous trees NORFOLK COUNTY ■ Upgraded water intake system at Norfolk CA ELGIN COUNTY ■ Removed ash trees in campground at Norfolk CA and Memorial Forest in response to Haldimand: 177 acres Emerald Ash Borer Norfolk:s,oss acres ■ Hired 8 summer students through federally-funded programs ■ Received provincial special employment funding to hire 2 summer students Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 Long Point Region Conservation Authority I Watershed Snapshot I Mid-Year Review 2016 Long Point Region -M--- Conservation Authority 4 Elm St, Tillsonburg, ON N4G OC4 519-842-4242 1 Fax 519-842-7123 1 conservation@lprca.on.ca I www.lprca.on.ca @longpointca OLong PointConservation ' � f0 Serving the Community since 1978 519-842-9000 www.multiservicecentre.com Join us on Facebook&Twitter Click on the icons on MSC home page In September of 1916, women in Canada had just started to get the right to vote. A woman wearing a swim suit that did not cover arms, legs and feet provoked protest, and sometimes charges of public nudity', although this / was beginning to change. School attendance to the age of 16 did not become mandatory in Ontario until 1954.* A workplace incident in Toronto in March 1960, where five individuals were buried alive under the Don River, led to many occupational health &safety reforms. Caregiving was assumed to be'women's work.'The pace of change is sometimes slow - it was 1940 before all Canadian women had the right to vote. So, as we enter September,the month where we celebrate Labour Day, as well as the 501h anniversary of International Literacy Day this year, let's raise a glass to all of those who have helped society move forward in a positive way - making for"Healthier Communities" (another thing we celebrate in September). (Picture:a campaign pennant from Manitoba,circa 1916). What's Happening - keep checking the MSC website for details & updates • Sept. 8: 50th Anniversary of International Literacy Day • Sept. 22: Celebrate Tillsonburg. Tillsonburg Town Centre. htto://www.multiservicecentre.com/images/unloads/flyer-Celebrate°/u2OTiIlsonburgl6.i3df • Nov. 17: Business After 5 (Chamber of Commerce). In The Livingston Centre. • Ongoing: MSC Employment Services offer regular sessions. Program/Agency News & Info: Adult Literacy & Essential Skills (ALES) -Since 1987- ext. 266 • Why literacy matters: httos://issuu.com/decodaliteracy/docs/decoda literacy manifesto • *Data quoted above from:htto://i3ublications.gc.ca/Collection/Statcan/11F0019MIE/IIF0019MIE2005251.odf Employment Services (ES) - Since 1985- ext. 291 • From Workforce Planning and Development Board: 42% of the Canadian labour force is at a high risk of being affected by automation in the next decade or two • htto://oxfordroboticschallenge.com/index.htmi • http://www.worktrends.ca/sites/default/files/u82/"HardToFiliPositionsReport 2016Emo1over0neSurvev.odf Home Support (HS) - Since 1978- ext. 205 • Thx to Darwin Kent for his kind comments about the MOWs program (check out MSC's FB page!) MSC Administration/Operations • Staying On PACE:Thx to Denise &Geoff for the recent review of Emergency Planning procedures - never know when you will need this info! Stonebridge (MSC's not-for-profit fee-for-service sister corporation) Visit: www.stonebridciecs.com. Also see MSC's What's Happening page for more info. Giving MSC will be hosting a new fundraiser soon - stay tuned! Volunteering • Did you know Millennials are volunteering in record numbers? Good news for the future: http://www.edmontonexaminer.com/2016/08/24/volunteer-edmonton-this-generation-takes-action Our Team likes this: • https://wwwyoutube.com/watch?v=fwwPmNWQflY MSC has been accredited through Accreditation Canada since 2003 96 Tillson Ave., Tillsonburg ON N4G 3A1 (in The Livingston Centre) �� "Someone You Know May Need Us" R: 30/8/16 mcv Subject: Elgin Economic Development Newsletter Aug. 2016 i)Like Twool , ® $h..J r r 40 /enalncr ElginCounty Progressive by Nature i g Business Profile New Shawarma Restaurant Opens in Port Stanley T Shebaz's Shawarma& Falafel has officially opened for business at 175 William Street, Port Stanley, C I restaurant owned by Doris and Gabriel Chordeker serves up Mediterranean style street cuisine that in( Shawarma, Falafel, and Samosas. The couple used to run the Max Milk Convenience Store in Port StE during this time realized that an opportunity existed to offer a different style of cuisine in the village. To learn more about Shebaz s Shawarma click here. Business Resource Save The Date for Enterprise Elgin The 2nd Annual Enterprise Elgin Business Development Competition is currently Illk submissions. Entrepreneurs or existing businesses are encouraged to create a bu; development plan regarding a new business venture, a new product, or an expand business development plan will then be entered into a competition to win thousanc and in-kind prizes to help the business grow. ENTERPRISE ELGIN To learn more about the Enterpise Elgin Business Development Competition click I Business Plan Competition Business Profile Empower Fore Life - Confidence and Resilience Through Fitness and Sport I Growing up, Sarah Westaway was passionate about fitness. She was involved in n in high school and attended Ball State University on a golf scholarship. She gradu; Bachelor of Science degree from the School of Health and Physiology with a minor - Community Health and has now returned to Elgin County to pursue a career as a t EMPOWER 10 I ' . the Thames Valley District School Board. id In May of 2016, Sarah founded the Empower Fore Life Golf and Fitness Leadershil Vo a way to build self-confidence and self-resilience in young women through fitness To learn more about Empower Fore Life click here. Business Profile Wildflowers Farm - Growing and Evolving Naturally 3 Nestled among fragrant fields of flowers,just minutes from Lake Erie's north shore, sits Wildflowers Farm the homestead of Jane and Chuck Magri and their three yourn children. The Magris moved to the farm on Fruit Ridge Line in 2007, and soon after 1 launched Wildflowers Tea. The pair opened a store on the farm in 2013 as a place b Wildflowers Honey, Wildflowers Tea blends, and herb-infused bath products. ,ay-- To learn more about Wildflowers Farm click here. � f L ---I !went Culture Days MCULTURE! Elgin County will be celebrating Culture Days September 30 -October 2. To Learn more about Culture Days in Elgin County click here. Rim www.progressivebynature.com ire having problems viewing or downloading the images for the PDF version of the newsletter. o a°oR ONTARIO ® GOOD ROADS ASSOCIATION 1525 CORNWALL ROAD, UNIT 22 OAKVILLE, ONTARIO L6J 0132 0 TELEPHONE 289-291-6472 FAX 289-291-6477 �ow�ci7��a�/�iuricpa�ties www.ogra.org August 30, 2016 Municipality of Bayham P.O. Box 160, 9344 Plank Road Straffordville ON NOJ 1 YO Attention: Mayor & Members of Council Re: OGRA Conference, February 26 — March 1, 2017, Fairmont Royal York Hotel OGRA has received numerous letters from municipalities endorsing a resolution from the Township of South-West Oxford regarding ROMA's decision to end the OGRA/ROMA Combined Conference partnership. OGRA would like to take a moment to set the record straight. The OGRA Board of Directors was surprised and disappointed by ROMA's unilateral decision to revert back to running a separate conference, thus ending a very productive, 17 year partnership that served Ontario municipalities well. The Combined Conference was a major success that strengthened both organizations. OGRA remains open to re- establish the Combined Conference partnership with ROMA because that is the best way for both organizations to serve their municipal members. That said, we also want to take a moment to assure you that the 2017 OGRA Conference will continue to offer a diverse cutting edge program for our delegates. We can confirm that: • A number of world class keynote speakers have confirmed their attendance; • The concurrent sessions will cover the wide spectrum of municipal issues and will continue to be both thought-provoking and applicable to OGRA's municipal members; • For the third consecutive year, OGRA will convene the Small Town Forum; • OGRA's Emerging Municipal Leaders Forum will also be held for the third straight year; • OGRA intends to hold a Ministers' Forum and are in discussions with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs regarding the scheduling of delegations during the • conference. The fact that the OGRA Conference will be held later in February when the legislature is sitting, will no doubt facilitate Provincial participation; • The trade show will be substantially enhanced; • Additional meals will be included in the basic registration fee; and • Registration fees will be unchanged from 2016 rates. Should you or any members of your council have any questions, I would encourage to you contact us. On behalf of the OGRA Board of Directors, we hope to see you at the 2017 OGRA Conference in Toronto, February 26th — March 1st, 2017. Regards, Executive Director Ministry of Energy Ministere de I'Energie Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre 4"Floor,Hearst Block 4e 6tage,edifice Hearst 900 Bay Street 900,rue Bay IMMM®'dv I Toronto ON M7A 2E1 Toronto ON M7A 2E1 Ontario Tel.: 416-327-6758 Tel. : 416 327-6758 Fax: 416-327-6754 Te1ec. :416 327-6754 s i . September 1, 2016 0 6 Z 016 His Worship Paul Ens Mayor MUNICIPAt.11"Y OF MUM Municipality of Bayham 9344 Plank Road PO Box 160 Straffordville ON NOJ 1YO Dear Mayor Ens: I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on changes to legislation that will help protect electricity consumers from door-to-door energy contract sales. Amendments to the Energy Consumer Protection Act (ECPA), and the supporting regulation, provide increased protective measures for consumers when entering into energy contracts with electricity retailers and gas marketers. This includes measures aimed at protecting consumers against aggressive sales tactics and providing consumers with the ability to make more informed choices about energy purchases. Some of the key changes include: • Banning door-to-door sales of retail energy contracts and creating rules to govern permissible marketing activity at the home of a consumer; • Requiring that all retail energy contracts, including those entered into over the Internet, are subject to a standardized verification process; • Authorizing the Ontario Energy Board (OEB), through its codes/rules, to require that prices offered by retailers and marketers be determined in accordance with specific requirements; • Prohibiting sales agents selling energy retail contracts from being remunerated based on commission; • New cancellation provisions that will also allow consumers to cancel an energy contract 30 days after receiving their second bill, with no cost; and • Prohibiting auto-renewal for all energy contracts. Provisions amending the ECPA will be proclaimed into force on January 1, 2017. Additionally, the amendments to O. Reg. 389/10 (General) made under the ECPA were filed with the Registrar of Regulations on June 24, 2016, with an effective date of January 1 , 2017. .../cont'd -2- The government works with the OEB to protect consumers. The OEB will update its codes of conduct and other regulatory documents to align with the amendments to the ECPA and O. Reg. 389/10. To view the amendments to O. Reg. 389/10, as filed with the Registrar of Regulations, please visit www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/rl6241 . These measures were enacted to support and protect Ontario's ratepayers in light of an evolving energy sector. The banning of door-to-door energy contracts, together with limiting high-pressure sales tactics, will help ensure that electricity consumers are better protected. Strengthening consumer protection in the energy sector is part of the government's plan to build Ontario up, and we are committed to improving policies and processes that impact the everyday lives of Ontarians. I trust that this information is helpful. Please accept my best wishes. Sincerely, Glenn Thibeault Minister 871ohn Street Scath the T O W N S H I P of Aylmar CA M5FI ZC.3 telephone: 51 5344 Fax: 5 IY-/73-3334 &IALANION www.malaFiae.ca x proud tradition, a Firighrturure. September 2, 2ul I; Jennifer Reynaert Chiet Administrative Officer Town at Aylmer 46 1 albot Street West Aylmer, ON N5H l i t Paul Shipway Chief Administrative Officer Municipality of Bayham Bc,& 160, 93 Plank Road 5trattordville, ON Nuj i Yu Don Leitch Chief Administrative Officer Municipality ut Central Elyin 450 Sunset urive St. I homas, ON N5R 5vi RE: Terrgtm Lodge — Fundraisiing Cvrnmittee At its reyular meeting held on September 1, 2016, the CUM icil of I he Corporation of the TuwnsHip at IVlalahide cun5ideted a request received trait Deputy Mayor Mike Wulfe to estaBlish a local team to initiate a capital fui idraising campaign to assist with the rebuilding of Tarraue lodge. Following svmc discussion on the matter, Me Uoancil passed the following Resolution: HA t the Malahida Tow, snip Council does he,evy support the creation or a t-nridraising Tea,n >v, the purpose of establisning a capital fundraisi„g campaign to assist w,ln the rebuilding of /errace Lodge; AND THA i sucn f-undraising Team ve comprised of representatives of the Cupnuils or the East Elgi„ n,rmicipalities: ANu THAT Deputy Maayur Wolfe be appoi„red as the l ownship of Malah,7e's representative to the Fundraising Team; - 1 - ANu /HA l an invitation be forwarded to the Town of Aylmer, the Municipality or 13ayham, and the Municipality of Central Elgin seeking one Council member to participate on the Fundraising Team; AND THAT sauh Fundrising Team ba unatgea witn the rasNun sib ility to develop a re,ms of rulerarnue rur a -I err ace Lodge t-undraising Cuorrimittee" inuludiitg but not limited to, recommending to the participating Municipal Uuuncils the rollowing: - the composition of the "Terrace Lodge Fundf131f►g Cummiffee - the desired fur►draising goal for the capital campaign; - the p,uuess/Nrugram tur soliciting dunatimis during the campaign period; and the establishment of any necessary administrative support. We look forward to hearing from you ,uyardiny yucir sappurFf tur the creation ut a Fandraisiny Tuam tu assist with the re6ailding of i erraue Cudge, as well as contact inturmatiun tur year c;uancil/manicipal representative. it you require any additional information regarding this request, please du nut hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours very-yy traly, i OVVI45RIP uF MACHAIDE Q M. CASAVECCHIA-SOMERS, D.P.A., C.M.O., CMM III Chief Administrative Offiuvr/Clerk uopy - County UT Elgin — MarR IVIcQonald € 4 y r }- 'L.l imp E i x a � S p 0 6 Z016 I MUNI01PALl"TY OF BAYWF A Port Burwell Historical Society Port Burwell Lighthouse Box 10, Port Burwell, Ontario,NOJ 1TO September 6, 2016 Municipality of Bayham, Attention: Mayor Paul Ens, Deputy Mayor Thomas Southwick, Councillors, Randy Breyer, Edward Ketchabaw, Wayne Casier. Ship's Wheelhouse Proiect. Dear Sirs: The above project was first introduced to, and accepted, by Museums Bayham, a Committee of Bayham Council. It was determined, at that time, that, when the need for fund raising,the requirement of volunteer help,the contracting of moving it to Port Burwell, and other necessary considerations, this project could be more easily handled by The Port Burwell Historical Society. This Society was formed in May, 1995, at the suggestion of The Port Burwell Council, at that time, for the express reasons stated above. This group has been fund raising and planning and conducting Community activities for all of this time. It is also responsible for the larger share of artifacts and improvements to The Port Burwell Marine Museum and The Historic 1840 Lighthouse as well as The Canada Day Parades and Celebrations, countless historical seminars, and many other community activities, over the years. Many of these activities have been aided and participated in, by The Municipality of Bayham, for which, we are deeply grateful. The wheelhouse is now situated in Port Burwell, pending refurbishment, and moving it to its home in front of the Marine Museum,to, more effectively, attract more visitors to the Museum and to make it, truly, look like a Marine Museum. The move was a very major undertaking and the costs went beyond what was anticipated when the move was ordered. However, the full cost of the move, is now fully paid, by The Port Burwell Historical Society. At this point, we need help. Page 2. We have been presented with additional costs in the amount of about$4000.00, for permits and an application for variance to amalgamate the Marine Museum lot and the parking lot, which we had no idea, were separate lots. This is Municipal property and the wheelhouse, when placed, will, also, be Municipal property, donated to The Municipality of Bayham, by The Port Burwell Historical Society, as a very valuable artifact. We feel that this is a prime opportunity for The Municipality of Bayham,to give a hand up to The Port Burwell Historical Society, by foregoing these fees and making it,truly, a joint project, with no real capital cost. After all, we are all trying to accomplish the same result, making our Community a more attractive, and better place to visit, and to live in. Thank you very much for the opportunity to present this case and for your serious consideration. Sincerely, Charles E. Buchanan, Treasurer, Port Burwell Historical Society. No H ._ ? REPORT qoAortunity CAO Is�o TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAO DATE: September 15, 2016 REPORT: CAO-55/16 SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY BACKGROUND In October 1998 Council passed a resolution that a Committee be struck to prepare a Municipal Alcohol Policy for the Municipality of Bayham. The Municipality has generally annually reviewed the Municipal Alcohol Policy through the Community Centre Committee or via staff. In 2016 to prepare for the reopening of the Straffordville Community Centre the Municipal Alcohol Policy was thoroughly reviewed by the Elgin St. Thomas Public Health Unit and Municipal Staff. The revised Municipality of Bayham — Municipal Alcohol Policy is attached hereto as Appendix `A'. DISCUSSION The Elgin St. Thomas Public Health Unit review and comment is attached hereto as Appendix `B'. Staff incorporated all Health Unit recommendations: Additionally staff removed a few items and clarified language for liability purposes: 1) Removed Bayham history 2) Removed Fire Halls and the Edison Museum as an eligible location a. These locations may still be approved by an application to Council 3) Minor changes to remove liability from `Municipal Representative' Staff removed the sample signage as once approved three sets of permanent signage will be produced. One set for the SCC, VCC and an extra set for outdoor and other location events. Drawings will also be inserted defining permitted areas within each of the SCC and the VCC. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-55/16 re Municipal Alcohol Policy be received for information; 2. AND THAT staff be directed to post the revised Municipality of Bayham Municipal Alcohol Policy for review on the Municipal Website; 3. AND THAT at the conclusion of the fourteen (14) day review period staff be directed to bring forward a by-law for Council consideration to adopt the same. Respectfully Submitted by: �� Paul Shipway CAO MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MISSION STATEMENT, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE ALCOHOL MANAGEMENT POLICY...........................................................3 2. POLICY REGULATIONS REGULATION #1: MUNICIPAL FACILITIES ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL OCCASION PERMIT EVENTS..................4 REGULATION #2: MUNICIPAL PROPERTIES, FACILITIES AND EVENTS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL OCCASION PERMIT EVENTS.......................................................4 REGULATION #3: SIGNS......................................................................5 REGULATION #4: SAFE TRANSPORTATION.......................................... 7 REGULATION #5: YOUTH ADMISSION TO ADULT EVENTS...................... 8 REGULATION #6: ALCOHOL SERVICE...................................................9 REGULATION #7: CONTROLS PRIOR TO EVENT...................................10 REGULATION #8: EVENT WORKERS/SERVER TRAINING PROGRAM RECOGNIZED BY THE LIQUOR LICENCE BOARD OF ONTARIO....................12 REGULATION #9: CONTROLS DURING EVENT.......................................13 REGULATION #10:INSURANCE............................................................14 REGULATION #11:POLICY MONITORING AND REVISIONS......................15 REGULATION #12:POLICY SUPPORT AND IMPLENTATION.....................15 3. CONSEQUENCES FOR FAILURE TO APPLY.............................................16 APPENDIX "A" CHECKLIST FOR RENTERS..............................18 APPENDIX "B" APPLICATIONS TO COUNCIL OUTDOOR SPECIAL OCCASION PERMITS.........20 MISSION STATEMENT To provide the Municipality of Bayham with a range of measures designed to prevent alcohol related problems and manage the consumption of alcohol within their facilities and parks in accordance with appropriate liquor laws, thereby decreasing municipal liability as well as increasing the enjoyment of those using municipal facilities. GOALS The Municipality of Bayham wants residents and visitors to enjoy the various facilities and parks available. Through the efforts of the people, the Municipality offers a variety of recreational experiences for people of all ages. In order for the Municipality to ensure the health and safety of its participants and the protection of municipal facilities, a policy for the orderly use of alcohol during events and functions has been developed. The following document outlines these regulations. OBJECTIVES 1. To ensure proper operation and supervision of Special Occasion Permit events by providing education in prevention and intervention techniques and in effective management procedures. This will lower the risk of liability to event organizers, participants, volunteers, the Municipality and its staff. 2. To reinforce responsible drinking practices for consumers through appropriate operational procedures, controls, training and education. 3. To honour the decision of abstainers not to drink alcohol and to encourage their participation by providing alternative, non-alcoholic beverages. 4. To provide a balanced use of alcohol through Special Occasion Permits so that alcohol becomes a responsible part of a social function, rather than the reason for it. 5. To provide a balance of licensed and non-licensed programs to ensure that consumers, abstainers, adults, youth and families will be adequately serviced and protected. Please note: Throughout this document "Smart Serve" trained program will be used to identify the Server Training programs recognized by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario and may include Server Training Program (S.T.P.) or Server Intervention Program (S.I.P.) 3 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 1 : MUNICIPAL FACILITIES ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL OCCASION PERMIT EVENTS A. Straffordville Community Centre D. Vienna Community Centre REGULATION # 2: MUNICIPAL PROPERTIES, FACILITIES AND EVENTS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL OCCASION PERMIT EVENTS A. All Municipal properties not listed in Regulation # 1 B. Exceptions Any person wishing to hold a Special Occasion Permit event in a location not listed in this policy, must apply to the Council of the Municipality of Bayham for approval, subject to meeting requirements as deemed appropriate. C. Requirements The applicant is responsible for obtaining/meeting any applicable Municipal, Provincial, and/or Federal requirements, including police, fire, health and building regulations. See Checklist for Applicants to Council for use of Facilities Appendix «B„ A. All Youth Focused Events (i.e. minor sports events and banquets, family day and family focused events etc.) Rationale: Minor sports events and family events are intended for young people and families. If adults don't drink at these events, it sets an example for youth. As adults are responsible for the transportation of young people, it also decreases the risk of parents drinking and driving and sets another positive example. 4 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 3: SIGNS A. Statement of Intoxication This sign will be provided by the Municipality and will be a minimum of 8 1 /2' X 11 to be placed in the bar area. "It is against the Liquor Licence Act of Ontario for licensed establishments to serve customers to intoxication. For this reason, servers in our facilities are required to obey the law and not serve anyone to intoxication. We are also pleased to offer non- alcohol beverages." B. Accountability Signage will be supplied by the Municipality and shall be a minimum of 8 1 / 2" x 11". These signs will be posted at the bar and/or main entrance of all S.O.P. functions. (a) Telephone Area (Main entrance) One sign will inform patrons where to direct concerns regarding the manner in which the function has been operated and should include the name, address and telephone number of the facility, the name, address and phone numbers of the Municipal Representative for the facility, Police Department and The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) at 1-800-522-2876. (b) Bar Area In addition, a changeable sign providing the name, address and telephone number of the sponsor of the event is to be supplied and posted. Rationale: Having these signs visible to participants eliminates any confusion on who to contact for information or to lodge complaints regarding an event. 5 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY C. No Last Call There will be no "Last Call Will Not Be Announced" signage. Sponsor and Disc Jockey are to be advised that this is not to be announced. D. Ticket Sales and Unused Tickets Signs stating "All Ticket Sales End at 12:30 a.m." and "Unused Tickets Can Be Redeemed" will be provided by the Municipality and will be placed in the bar area at a minimum size of 8 1/2" x 11". Ticket sales for alcohol shall be limited to four tickets at one time per person. E. Bar Closing A sign stating "Bar closes at 1:00 a.m., Tables cleared by 1:30 a.m." will be provided by the Municipality and will be placed in the bar area at a minimum size of 8 1/2" x 1111. F. Acceptable ID A sign stating "Acceptable ID is required as perAGCO" and a sign stating "No Minors Served" will be provided by the Municipality and will be placed in the bar area at a minimum size of 8 1/2" x 11". G. No Drinks Beyond This Point A sign stating "No drinks beyond this point" will be placed appropriately at the discretion of the Municipal Representative. H. Sandy's Law A "Sandy's Law" poster will be displayed in the bar area. J. Safe Transportation Signage promoting safe transportation and providing a telephone number(s) for taxi service, encouraging designated drivers is to be placed near the main entrance by the telephone. Advise the public that RIDE programs are in the community. 6 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 4: SAFE TRANSPORTATION Only individuals, groups or organizations implementing a safe transportation strategy will be permitted rental/use privileges of facilities for Special Occasion Permit functions. The sponsor is to decide which option(s) of Safe Transportation will be provided during their event. Possible Strategies: a) Designated Drivers Program -to be advertised at the event so that all patrons are aware this program is available. The designated driver should be provided with non-alcoholic beverages during the function. b) Impaired individuals will be driven home by a sober friend, and/or call a relative, or taxi. c) Inform patrons through advertising of the Taxi service available. d) Promote O.P.P. RIDE Program Rationale: The risk of liability is high when an impaired driver leaves an event where alcohol is served. Event organizers must assume responsibility for promoting safe transportation for all patrons consuming alcohol. 7 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 5: YOUTH ADMISSION TO ADULT EVENTS Each rental group will be responsible to select a strategy on allowing youth to their event. In all cases the following guidelines must be adhered to: 1. I.D. with picture and date of birth must be checked before anyone is allowed into the event/facility: Acceptable forms of photo identification as per AGCO include: • Ontario Driver's Licence with a photo of the person to whom the licence is issued • A Canadian Passport • Canadian Citizenship Card with a photo of the person to whom the card is issued • Canadian Armed Forces Identification Card • A photo card issued by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO), entitled Bring Your ID (BYID) • A Secure Indian Status Card issued by the Government of Canada • A Permanent Resident Card issued by the Government of Canada • A photo card issued under the Photo Card Act, 2008 2. Two (2) extra floor monitors will be required if persons under the age of majority are allowed to enter the event. 3. Individuals under the age of majority will not be allowed to consume alcohol beverages. Any one serving individuals under the age of majority will be required to leave the event. 4. All participants over the age of majority will be identified by a stamp on the back of the right hand, or by the placing of a wrist or arm band, before entering the event. Rationale: To ensure that persons under the age of majority do not consume alcohol. 8 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 6: ALCOHOL SERVICE A. Low Alcohol Drinks In order to be eligible for a facility rental involving a Special Occasion Permit, the renter must provide low and non-alcohol beverages. The minimum amount of low alcohol content beverages available is to be 30% of the designated total. There can be no extra strength beer (over 5%) served. Free non-alcohol beverages will be at the discretion of the permit holder. Rationale: Low alcohol content significantly contributes to less intoxication. Not having higher alcohol content beer is a great prevention strategy. B. Control of Alcohol Service 1) All drinks may be served in disposable cups and all bottles and/or cans retained in the bar area. 2) Sponsor(s) and disc jockey will be advised by that "Last Call" is not to be announced." 3) Renters will not use marketing practises such as: availability of oversized drinks, double shots, pitchers of beer, drinking contests, volume discounts or tickets including a free bar, as these practises encourage increased alcohol consumption. 4) Tickets for alcohol must be purchased from designated ticket sellers, with a maximum of 4 tickets per purchase. Unused tickets can be redeemed. 5) Ticket sales must end at 12:30 a.m. and the bar close at 1:00 a.m. Tables are to be cleared by 1:30 a.m. and the facility vacated by 2:00 a.m. 6) Adequate food must be provided throughout the event. Food refers to sandwiches, cheeses, vegetable and dip, etc. Chips and snack foods are not sufficient. 9 7) There will be no self-serve events, even "Wine and Cheese" functions require a bartender. Rationale: By following the above practices we will reduce the risk that sponsors automatically assume when running an event. These practices are designed to encourage alcohol use in accordance with Canada's Low Risk Alcohol Drinking Guidelines. C. Advertising Events: Renters must follow the Liquor Licence application regulations regarding alcohol advertising which states that groups cannot advertise the brands or the cost of the alcohol to be served unless application is made to the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. Rationale: Alcohol advertising is designed to encourage and promote the consumption of alcohol. Since it is illegal for people under the age of 19 to consume these products, alcohol advertising is not permitted. It is also the desire of the Municipality to provide a positive example to under-age patrons. 10 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 7: CONTROLS PRIOR TO EVENTS RENTERS OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO UNDERSTAND THE MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY PRIOR TO RENTING. 1. A copy of the Municipal Alcohol Policy will be available from the Municipal Representative at the time of booking. If any questions or concerns arise from this policy contact the Municipal Representative for clarification. 2. A "Checklist For Renters" form will be provided by the Municipality at the time of booking. This form is to be completed by the Renter and returned to the Municipal Representative at least two (2) weeks prior to the event. Signatures from both the Renter and the Municipal Representative are required on this form. Please see "Appendix A". 3. The signatory of the S.O.P. must attend the event, and be responsible for decisions regarding the actual operation of the event. This person and all event workers must not drink alcohol before or during the event. Rationale: The above is to ensure that there are no misunderstandings of the regulations contained in the Policy. 11 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 8: EVENTWORKERS/SERVER TRAINING THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES ARE TO BE FOLLOWED REGARDING THE RATIO OF SERVER TRAINED PERSONS TO UNTRAINED SERVER PERSONS. Public Event # of Bartenders Floor Door Ticket Sellers Participants Supervisors / Supervisors Monitors Under 50 1 Trained No monitor 1 Trained N/A people required 50 — 100 1 or 100% No Monitor 2Trained 1 Trained people Trained required 100 — 250 2 or 100% 1 Trained 2 Trained 2 or 100% people Trained 2* Trained Trained 250 —400 2 Trained 2 Trained 2 Trained 2 Trained people 2* Trained *2 extra floor monitors are required for events allowing participants under the age of majority (19). Note: Worker numbers for events may increase or decrease and adequate volunteer or paid security personnel may be requested at the discretion of the Municipal Representative. Private Event # of Bartenders Floor Door Ticket Sellers Participants Supervisors / Supervisors Monitors Under 50 1 Trained No Monitor N/A N/A people required 50 — 100 2 Trained 1 trained N/A N/A people Over 100 2 or 100% 2 Trained N/A N/A people Trained 12 REGULATION # 9 CONTROLS DURING EVENT ALL CONTROLS AND SERVICE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE LIQUOR LICENCE ACT OF ONTARIO AND ITS REGULATIONS. 1. The entrances and exits to the event must be monitored by at least one responsible person meeting the age of majority requirements for public functions with under 100 persons in attendance, two responsible persons meeting the age of majority requirements for public functions with 100 or more persons in attendance. These persons shall further observe for individuals that may be attempting to enter the premises and that appear to be impaired. 2. Only identification bearing a photograph, and issued by the Province of Ontario, the Government of Canada or photographic identification issued by another Province, State or Country shall be accepted as bona-fide proof of age. Acceptable forms of photo identification as per AGCO include: • Ontario Driver's Licence with a photo of the person to whom the licence is issued • A Canadian Passport • Canadian Citizenship Card with a photo of the person to whom the card is issued • Canadian Armed Forces Identification Card • A photo card issued by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO), entitled Bring Your ID (BYID) • A Secure Indian Status Card issued by the Government of Canada • A Permanent Resident Card issued by the Government of Canada • A photo card issued under the Photo Card Act, 2008 Refer to "AGO Responsible Service — checking ID" 3. The holder of the Special Occasion Permit shall be the person renting the facility and is responsible to ensure that the event is properly supervised and will provide enough staff to fulfil this obligation, at his/her cost. 4. In the event of a masquerade party taking place in any premise owned by the Municipality of Bayham, the permit holder is responsible to check all patrons I.D. to ensure they are of legal drinking age. Any person under the age of majority will not be allowed into a masquerade event. 13 5. Event staff must be clearly identifiable and identification must be clearly stated on the "Checklist For Renters" form. (Example Stick-on I.D. labels or other distinguishing I.D.). 6. The bar area within the premises shall be closed promptly at 1:00 a.m. and No Service of alcoholic beverages will be allowed after this time. 7. All entertainment with the facility shall cease no later than 1:00 a.m. 8. All signs of the consumption and service of alcohol including empty glasses shall be removed from sight within 30 minutes of the expiry of the Special Occasion Permit or by 1:30 a.m., whichever time is earliest. 9. To assist staff and ensure that no incidents occur within the premises, and the facility must be vacated by 2:00 a.m. The only exception to the 1:00 a.m. closing time would be during a New Year's Eve event when the Special Occasion Permit indicates the expiry time of 2:00 a.m. Relative deadlines would be extended by one (1) hour as appropriate. Rationale: To ensure the safety of all persons and to promote orderly conduct during events. REGULATION # 10: INSURANCE The sponsor(s) of a special occasion permit event being held in a municipally owned facility is required to provide a certificate of insurance, naming the Municipality of Bayham as an additional insured, in the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000), at least fourteen (14) days prior to the event. Rationale: i) Special Occasion Permit holders, hall owners, club executives and volunteers could all be named in a law suit, with Municipalities also being held jointly liable, and end up paying the predominant share of an award to a plaintiff should the sponsor be uninsured. 14 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY REGULATION # 11: POLICY MONITORING AND REVISIONS The alcohol management policy for the Municipality of Bayham, as approved by Council, will be reviewed annually by the Municipality of Bayham, which will discuss any potential changes and recommend to Council for consideration and approval. Rationale: i) Monitoring and review of the Policy on a yearly basis will ensure that the policy remains up to date and effective. ii) Solicitation of public comments will allow the public to remain involved in the process of review and update of the existing policy. REGULATION # 12: POLICY SUPPORT AND IMPLEMENTATION The Municipality shall provide a copy of the Municipal Alcohol Policy to all facility users for events with alcohol to promote the policy and its requirements. The same will be posted on the Municipal Website. MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY CONSEQUENCES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY Although the Police will be called if a situation deems it necessary to do so, it is the responsibility of the Special Occasion Permit Holder to ensure the proper management of an event. Individuals and/or groups who fail to comply with the Municipal Alcohol Policy shall be subject to the following consequences: 1. Special Occasion Permit holder/ event workers /volunteers will report any infraction of this policy to legal authorities whenever they believe such action is required. Where a minor infraction occurs they will notify the sponsor of the event. 2. Should a situation arise where the Municipal Representative deems it necessary to notify the sponsor of an infraction, and upon so doing the sponsor fails to comply, an event may be immediately shut down. 3. Failure to comply with the above could prevent the Licence Holder or Organization from further renting any Municipal facility and where appropriate, the Police will be advised and charges could be laid. 4. Any infraction of the Municipal Alcohol Policy will be reported by the Municipal Representative. Should the Municipal Representative choose to do so, an appropriate letter may be sent describing the problem to the sponsor. The Municipal Representative may refuse future rental privileges to the sponsor, giving notice of same by sending an appropriate letter. 5. Where persons under the age of majority are found to have consumed or to be consuming alcohol at Special Occasion Permit or non-Special Occasion Permit events, the authorities may be called and/or the following procedure will be followed by the Municipal Representative: First Infraction: The individual(s) will be turned over to a parent or guardian. If a parent or guardian is not available, the police will be called. A registered letter will be sent by the Municipal Representative to the parents/guardians. Second Infraction: The individual(s) will be banned from attending any function held in any municipal facility for a period of 3 months. A registered letter will be sent by the Municipal Representative to the parents/guardians. 16 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY Third Infraction: A registered letter will be sent by the Municipal Representative notifying the individual(s) that they are banned indefinitely from the facility. The individual(s) may appeal to the Municipal Representative for written reinstatement. 6. Where adults and/or youth engage in disruptive behaviour at social events, authorities may be called and/or the following procedure will be followed by the Municipal Representative: First Infraction: A verbal warning will be given to the individual(s) by staff in charge or head of the function. If individual(s) do not adhere to this warning the Authorities will be called. A registered letter will be sent to the individual(s). Second Infraction: Individual(s) will be banned from attending all functions held in any municipal facility for a minimum period of 3 months. A registered letter will be sent to the individual(s) advising of same. Third Infraction: A registered letter will be sent notifying the individual(s) that they are banned indefinitely from the facility. The individual(s) must appeal to the Municipal Representative for written reinstatement. NOTE: Enforcement procedures and penalties apply to groups or organizations as well as individuals. Once a sponsor has received verbal notice of any infraction of this policy, the sponsor may be required to pay for the supply of police servicing. 17 Appendix "A" MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY "CHECKLIST FOR RENTERS" Date of Event(s): 1. Location of Event: 2. Number in Attendance: 3. Will persons under 19 years of age be attending this event? Yes No Note: *2 extra floor monitors are required for events with attendance over 100 people and allowing participants under the age of majority, and adequate volunteer or paid security personnel may be required. 4. Name of person and/or group sponsoring this event: 5. Type of Identification for event workers 6. Has proof of a Special Occasion Permit been provided? YES NO 7. Has proof of Insurance been provided? YES NO 8. The safe transportation strategy(s) that will be used at this function are: a) b) c) (2) 18 "CHECKLIST FOR RENTERS" 9. The names and certification numbers of Smart Serve trained program event workers are: 1) Name Certification # 2) Name Certification # 3) Name Certification # 4) Name Certification # 5) Name Certification # 6) Name Certification # 10. 1 have reviewed the Municipal Alcohol Policy with a municipal representative. Yes No _11. 1 understand all the policy regulations. Yes No 12. 1 and/or my group will observe and obey all policy regulations during the event. Yes No If No, explain: Signature of Special Occasion Permit holder Address Telephone Number Signature of Municipal Representative Date: 19 Appendix "B" MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM MUNICIPAL ALCOHOL POLICY OUTDOOR SPECIAL OCCASION PERMITS APPLICATION TO MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM COUNCIL Date of Event(s): Type of Event: 1. Location of Event: 2. Number in Attendance: 3. Will persons under 19 years of age be attending this event? Yes No 4. Name of person and/or group sponsoring this event: 5. Will there be extra staffing above the guidelines set out by the Municipal Alcohol Policy? Describe i.e. #, Adequate volunteer or paid security personnel, security company, volunteers (trained or untrained): 6. Government Approvals that are necessary: OPP Health Unit Fire Building Other 7. Transportation Strategies that will be used at this function are: a) b) 20 OUTDOOR SPECIAL OCCASION PERMITS APPLICATION TO MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM COUNCIL 8. Drawing of service area showing entrances, service area, seating area, fencing etc. Please attach. 9. Type of Fencing (i.e. Single or double fencing, snow fence etc.) 10. Disposable Glasses to be used? 11. Parking arrangements: 12. Type of identification for event workers: 13. 100 Percent of event workers must be Smart Serve trained: 14. The Municipal Alcohol Policy has been reviewed with a municipal representative. Yes No Signature of Applicant Address Telephone Number Date: 1230 Talbot Street, St. Thomas, ON N5P 1 G9 E LCi p: 1.800.922.0096 1 f: 519.633.0468 IN ST.THUMAS PUBLIC HEALTH elginhealth.on.ca July 5, 2016 Dear Mr. Shipway, RE: Municipal Alcohol Policy (MAP), Municipality of Bayham Thank you for the opportunity to provide the Municipality of Bayham with feedback on the current Municipal Alcohol Policy (MAP). The MAP was screened using the Blue Ribbon Screening Tool from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH). Current MAP Score: 71 Of note, a MAP score of greater than 70 has shown to reduce problems more quickly than those MAPs with lower scores. Components of your current MAP that contributed to a positive score: Designated Properties and Events: the municipality has clearly listed eligible and ineligible municipal properties for Special Occasions Permits. Management Practices: good practices are indicated in required areas such as minimum insurance coverage, limits for number of drinks sold at one time, no last call, workers not to consume alcohol, identification of workers, and identification needed to purchase alcohol. Prevention Strategies: the municipality engages in prevention strategies such as safe transportation, the use of plastic cups, availability of non- alcoholic beverages, and no alcohol advertising at facilities frequented by youth. Actions to Enforce: the municipality has met recommendations in this area for handling infractions for short term penalties and for long term penalties. Signs: the majority of the signage requirements are complete with the statement of intoxication, accountability, ticket sale limit, and restricted areas signs being noted. Policy support: ongoing policy monitoring and review is clearly outlined. July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 2 of 9 Please find below suggestions where the current MAP could be strengthened further under each of the six key components. Designation of Properties and Events Strengthen policy for full points by including those events NOT eligible for SOP events (i.e., youth minor sports events, family focused events, etc.) Management Practices Server-trained Event Staff: increase to the recommended minimum of 60% of staff. I would encourage to go all the way over the next year with a target of 100 % by the end of 2017. Entrance Monitoring: ensure there is no discrepancy within the document. Page 18 currently states you need to have one door monitor for fewer than 100 people and two monitors for over 100. Page 15 indicates that if you have fewer than 50 people no door staff is required. Recommend consistency in both areas. Special Security Arrangements: for events with attendees over a certain number/ currently, policy notes worker numbers may increase or decrease and adequate volunteer of paid security personnel may be requested at the discretion of the municipal representative. Policy changes would indicate when and where these changes are required so there are fewer areas for discussion (i.e., if you have an event with 1000 people, additional security in the form of x is required). Restricted Youth Admittance To Adult Events: while private events such as weddings or anniversary parties are exempted, consider restricting youth admittance to adult events. Prevention Strategies Low Alcohol Content: designate that a minimum of 30% of all the alcohol available is of low alcohol content. No extra strength beer available (no beer over 5%). Redemption of unused tickets (people are less likely to heavily consume alcohol at the end of an event when they can simply return the unused tickets). r r V. ems,. July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 3 of 9 Enforcement Procedures and Penalties You have met all the requirements, but could consider ensuring that groups or organizations are also noted in the first infraction/second infraction/third infraction area, not just individuals Signage Safe Transportation: you have this covered in the prevention strategy, going to the next step and putting up a sign clearly indicating such would bump up your points in the signage area. Acceptable ID: the municipality has listed this component under management practices, but it could also provide a clear sign indicating the acceptable ID required as per AGCO. This addition would and then you would have met all of the requirements under the signage section of the review. Though it is not required, I would recommend a Sandy's Law poster at all bar areas. This poster states that drinking alcohol during pregnancy can harm your unborn baby. Policy Support Indicate a plan for how staff will be oriented to the updated policy, or how the public will be made aware of the revisions so there are no surprises for people. An effective implementation plan could include a pamphlet, staff orientation etc. I have also included additional detailed comments on the entire MAP as listed below. Cover Page I think your statement of"Working Together For a Safer Community" is a great stand alone statement here. I do not think the statement, "Prevention is our goal and if we can achieve that we will not need a "cure"" is necessary on this page. July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 4of9 Page 1 Table of Contents: Bullet 3: Policy Regulations Regulation #3: Signs D is listed as "unused tickets" pg. 8. However, there is no reference to unused tickets on page 8, only a reference to ticket sales (which is great!) I could not find information on unused tickets anywhere. For revisions, consider changing the title of D to Ticket Sales, and then one could include the time that ticket sales end, maximum # of tickets to be sold, and redemption of unused tickets. This would be a great addition to that section. I would also add safe transportation under signage (you already have it covered under Prevention Strategies which is great). Page 5 Mission Statement I would suggest a more detailed statement here such as "To provide the Municipality of Bayham with a with a range of measures designed to prevent alcohol related problems and manage the consumption of alcohol within their facilities and parks in accordance with appropriate liquor laws, thereby decreasing municipal liability as well as increasing the enjoyment of those using municipal facilities." Page 6 Regulation # 2: Add Events NOT eligible for SOP. This would include events such as youth sporting events, family day events, minor sports banquets, etc. Rationale for this change: minor sports events and family events are intended for young people and families. If adults don't drink at these events, it sets an example for youth. As adults are responsible for the transportation of young people, it also decreases the risk of parents drinking and driving and sets another positive example. I� July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 5 of 9 Page 8 Regulation # 3 Signs Expand this to include Safe Transportation Signage and then you can include all information for safe transportation such as the taxi #, encouraging designated drivers, letting the public know that RIDE programs are in the community, etc. Page 10 Regulation # 5: Youth Admission to Adult Events Provide the acceptable identification list from AGCO as to what ID may be accepted for youth. Page 11 Regulation # 6 Alcohol Service Low-Alcohol Drinks: stipulate the minimum amount of low alcohol content beverages available is to be 30% of the designated total. Indicate that there can be no extra strength beer (over 5%) served. Rationale for this measure: Low alcohol content significantly contributes to less intoxication. Not having higher alcohol content beer is a great prevention strategy. Page 12 Regulation # 6 Alcohol Service B. Control of Alcohol Service 2) Consider strengthening the language from "renters will agree not to use marketing" ..... to "Renter will not use marketing practices"....) 4) Consider changing the maximum number of tickets per purchase from 8 to 4 to fit with Low Risk Drinking Guidelines. 6) Again, strengthen the language from "Consumption of food should be encouraged" to "Adequate food must be provided throughout the event." Indicate that food refers to sandwiches, cheeses, vegetable and dip, etc.; also indicate that chips and snack foods are not sufficient. I� July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 6 of 9 Rationale for this measure: Changing the word "guidelines" to "practices" strengthens expectations. Consider changing message to a positive instead of a negative for the last sentence so we are telling people what we want them to do, instead of what we don't want them to do. Instead of"These practices are designed to discourage heavy alcohol consumption," change the wording to, "These practices are designed to encourage alcohol use in accordance with Canada's Low Risk Alcohol Drinking Guidelines." Page 13 Alcohol Service C. Advertising Events Strengthen the language so you are not asking people to comply, you are letting them know what is not allowed. Instead of"it is preferred...," change to "alcohol advertising is not permitted." Page 14 Regulation # 7 Controls Prior to Events 4. Strengthen the language to say "...This person and all workers must not drink alcohol before or during the event" instead of"refrain from consumption during..." Page 15 Regulation # 8 Event workers/server training Consider placing these requirements in an easy-to-read table such as the one below: Public Event # of Participants Bartenders Floor Supervisors Door Ticket Sellers / Monitors Supervisors July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 7 of 9 Private Event # of Participants Bartenders Floor Supervisors Door Ticket Sellers / Monitors Supervisors Consider tightening up the numbers for events to include specific numbers of people (i.e., under 25, 25- 50, 51-100, 101-200, 201-300, 301-400, 401-500, 501-750, 750-1300 and so on). Specify according to each number what is expected for event workers. I strongly encourage increasing the number of Smart Serve Trained staff to the recommended minimum of 60%. With this percentage as the minimum, it would be a useful baseline to start with, with the ultimate goal of increasing to Smart Serve traingted staff to 100% in a given time frame. ESTPH could support the implementation of additional Smart Serve training in the area to meet this requirement. It is difficult to expect someone to be responsible for monitoring for intoxication in any area if they have not had any training on the early signs, what to monitor for, and how to prevent intoxication. Page 18 Regulation #9 Controls during the Event Look at including exits as well as entrances for areas being monitored. There is a discrepancy between the statement for staffing requirements on pg. 18 regulation #9 and those listed on pg. 15. Consider utilizing Identification as per"AGCO Responsible Service- checking ID" as acceptable proof of age. July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 8 of 9 5. Strengthen statement to say "Event staff must be clearly identifiable" and identification must be clearly stated on the "check list for renters"form. Page 20 Regulation # 10 Insurance. You may want to consider increasing the minimum amount to 5 million dollars. I would recommend consultation with the municipality's lawyer and insurance provider as I do not believe 1 million is adequate any longer. Page 22 Consequences for Failure to Comply Consider moving bullet 1. to the top of the page as a statement since it is not a consequence for failure to comply, but rather an outline of the responsibility and expectations. Page 27 The application to Municipality of Bayham Council. 5. If you clearly lay out the staffing requirements for events then you can change this to read "Will there be staffing at the guidelines set out by the Municipal Alcohol Policy"? If Bayham implemented the above suggestions the MAP would increase to a score of 100%. Given that change can be difficult at times, it may be reasonable to implement some of the easier items first, with a goal of further changes during the annual review of the MAP. This would also allow for feedback and collection of information from the end users of the facilities as well as staff. I� July 4, 2016 Municipality of Bayham Paul Shipway Page 9 of 9 1 hope that you will find this feedback useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments about the score or would like any further support in Bayham's MAP review. Kindest Regards, Jacky Allan RN BScN Public Health Nurse 519-631-9900 jallan@elginhealth.on.ca REPORT cao 0l'tunity Is TO: Mayor & Members of Council FROM: Paul Shipway, CAO DATE: September 15, 2016 REPORT: CAO-56/16 SUBJECT: 2017 COUNCIL SCHEDULE BACKGROUND: The proposed 2017 Council Schedule is attached hereto as Appendix `A'. Please note that this schedule is subject to change due to additions of public planning meetings, special council meetings or any other additions/deletions that may occur. Meetings during the summer recess are set for July 201h and August 17th 2017. RECOMMENDATION 1. THAT Report CAO-56/16 be received for information; 2. AND THAT Council approve the 2017 Meeting schedule attached hereto as Appendix `A'. Respectfully Submitted by: Paul Shipway CAO 2017 Council Schedule Date Meeting Time Public Agenda Items Due— 9:00 AM January 5 Council 7:00 p.m. December 20, 2016 January 19 Council 7:00 p.m. January 10, 2017 February 2 Council 7:00 p.m. January 24, 2017 February 16 Council 7:00 p.m. February 7, 2017 March 2 Council 7.00 P.M. February 21, 2017 March 16 Council 7:00 p.m. March 7, 2017 April 6 Council 7:00 p.m. March 28, 2017 April 20 Council 7:00 p.m. April 11, 2017 May 4 Council 7:00 p.m. April 25, 2017 May 18 Council 7:00 p.m. May 9, 2017 June 1 Council 7:00 p.m. May 23, 2017 June 15 Council 7:00 p.m. June 6, 2017 July 20 Council 7:00 p.m. July 11, 2017 August 17 Council 7:00 p.m. August 8, 2017 September 7 Council 7:00 p.m. August 29, 2017 September 21 Council 7:00 p.m. September 12, 2017 October 5 Council 7:00 p.m. September 26, 2017 October 19 Council 7:00 p.m. October 10, 2017 November 2 Council 7:00 p.m. October 24, 2017 November 16 Council 7:00 p.m. November 7, 2017 December 7 Council 7:00 p.m. November 28, 2017 December 21 Council 7:00 p.m. December 12, 2017 NOTE: Public Agenda Items and Delegations, pursuant to Section 6.8 and 8 of the Procedural By-law are due to staff in the specified format by Tuesday at 9:00 AM the week preceding the meeting. THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. Z652-2016 GREGORY UNDERHILL FARMS LIMITED BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW No. Z456-2003, AS AMENDED WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary to amend Zoning By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended; THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham enacts as follows: 1) THAT By-law No.Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Section 7.13 Exception — Rural Residential (RR) Zone by adding the following clauses: 7.13.30.1 Defined Area RR-31 as shown on Schedule "A", Map No.11 to this By-law. 7.13.30.2 Minimum Lot Area 0.38ha 7.13.30.3 Prohibited Uses Notwithstanding the regulations of subsection 7.11.1 of the By-law, the keeping of livestock shall be prohibited. 2) THAT By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Schedule "A", Map 11 by changing the zoning from Agricultural (Al)to Special Agricultural (A2) and Rural Residential (RR-31), which lands are outlined in heavy solid lines and marked Al and RR-31 on Schedule "A" to this By-law, which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 3) THIS By-law comes into force: a) Where no notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto, upon the expiration of the prescribed time; or b) Where notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto, upon the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board. READ A FIRST TIME AND SECOND TIME THIS 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016. READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016. MAYOR CLERK SEE SCHEDULE A-MAP No.9 SEE SCHEDULE A MAP No,9 "''6 LOT 10 1 � r 4 ! s kk LOT 12 o - LOT;13 LOT 14 v o LOT 15 1 -;LOT 16 i j - !� / LOT D� 1 3 Lr� � - 1 LOT!8 Ul ll! 1yy WWa { V Z t a 1 t t_ W SEE SCHEDULE H 1 w MAP VIE NNA A2 �eigy9 R1 ,Ij SEE / SCHEDULER This is Schedule"A"to By-law No.Z652-2016,passed the fIS-'tiday of Sz fJ,2016 SEE SCHEDULE A-MAP No,14 Mayor Clerk , MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM Legend SCHEDULE A Q ZBLA N- MAP No.11 -` LPRCARe9ulatimuret 0 XW COe 900 Mlles ZONING BY-LAW Z456-2003 CONSOLIDATED JAN 8,2016 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2016 - 080 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A SITE PLAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY AND THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM WHEREAS Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 13, as amended, provides, in part, that, where in an Official Plan an area is shown or described as a proposed site plan control area, the Council of the local municipality in which the proposed area is situate may, by by-law, designate the whole or any part of such area as a site plan control area; AND WHEREAS the Municipality of Bayham has enacted a Site Plan Control Area By-law 2005-061 pursuant to Section 41 of the said Planning Act. AND WHEREAS Section 41 of the said Planning Act, as cited above, provides that no person shall undertake any development in an area designated as subject to site plan control pursuant to a by-law enacted under that section without first having received approval, as the Council may determine, of the following: 1. Plans showing the location of all buildings and structures to be erected and showing the location of all facilities and works to be provided in conjunction therewith and of all facilities and works required under clause (7) (a). AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham now deems it necessary to enter into a Site Plan agreement with Max Underhill's Farm Supply NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Site Plan Agreement between The Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham and Max Underhill's Farm Supply affixed hereto and forming part of this By-law as Schedule „A„ 2. THAT the executed agreement be registered at the owner's expense against the land to which it applies under the Land Titles Registry Elgin # 11. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME this 15th day of September 2016. READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED this 15' day of September 2016. MAYOR CLERK SCHEDULE "A" TO BY-LAW 2016-080 SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY Part Lots 17 and 18, Concession 5, Municipality of Bayham 56532 Calton Line, Vienna Roll # 3401-000-003-05301 AND THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM This Agreement made in duplicate this 15th day of September 2016. BETWEEN: MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY (hereinafter the "Owner") Of the First Part AND: THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM (hereinafter the "Municipality") Of the Second Part WHEREAS the Owner is the owner in fee simple of the land situate in the Municipality of Bayham in the County of Elgin and Province of Ontario, being Part of Lots 17 and 18, Concession 5, therein, and more particularly identified and depicted in Attachment "A" attached hereto (and hereinafter referred to as the "Lands" ); AND WHEREAS, in effect, the Official Plan of the Municipality of Bayham designates the entirety of the Municipality as a site plan control area; AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with a Site Plan attached and marked as Attachment "A" hereto (and hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"); AND WHEREAS the Municipality, as a condition of approval of proposed development of the Lands requires the Owner to enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement as contemplated by By- Law No. 2016-047, being the Site Plan Control By-Law enacted by the Council for the Municipality; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration exchanged herein and, further thereto, the sum of two dollars ($2.00) of lawful money of Canada now paid by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, the Owner and Municipality hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. The Owner agrees that no building permit will be available for the development of the Lands until the Plan has been approved by the Municipality and further agrees that work in relation to such development will not commence prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The Attachments hereto and as described below, attached and verified by the signatures of the Parties hereto, are incorporated in and form part of this Agreement: Attachment "A"— Lands/Site Plan, Attachment "B" —Grading and Servicing Plan, and Attachment "C" —Certificate of Compliance. 3. The Parties agree and acknowledge that Attachment "A" (Lands/Site Plan) hereto identifies the Lands which are subject to this Agreement and, furthermore, depicts and details the Plan for development of the Lands, including but not limited to; (a) The location and height of all buildings and structures to be erected; (b) The location of vehicular entrances and exits; (c) The location and provision of off-Street vehicular loading and parking facilities, including driveways for emergency vehicles; (d) Walkways and all other means of pedestrian access; (e) The location and provision of fences, trees and all ground cover or facilities for landscaping the Lands and protecting the adjoining lands and, furthermore, depicts the lighting, including flood lighting, of the Lands and any building or structure to be erected thereon, specifically; i) A chain link fence, a minimum of 1.83m in height, is to be installed 0.05m east of the mutual property line between the Owner and the Utility Corridor jointly owned by the Town of Tillsonburg and the Municipality of Bayham, as depicted on Attachment "A" (f) The location and provision for the collection and storage of garbage and other waste materials. 4. The Owner agrees and covenants that the Lands will be developed, including but not limited to any building or structure that is to be erected thereon, in strict accordance with the Plan depicted on Attachment "A" hereto, subject only to such changes receiving prior approval from the Municipality. 5. The Parties agree and acknowledge that Attachment "B" ("Site Servicing Plan") hereto depicts and details proposed site servicing facilities for development of the Lands, including but not limited to; (a) Lot grading information, indicating overland flow to and from adjacent properties, collection and disposal of surface water and storm water management (if deemed necessary by the Municipality); (b) Location of utilities within the road allowance and site connections to these utilities; (c) Building finished floor elevations; (d) Other information as required by the Municipality. 6. The Owner agrees and covenants that the site development and servicing upon the Lands will be in strict accordance with the Plans depicted on Attachment "B" hereto, subject only to such changes receiving prior approval from the Municipality. 7. The Owner further agrees that: (a) Final grades and elevations will be established to the satisfaction of the Municipality. The Owner will provide proof of final grades and elevations certified by a professional land surveyor or civil engineer prior to consideration of any request for final release of any security held by the Municipality relative to the proposed development of the Lands. (b) All necessary provisions for service connections on-site will be made to the satisfaction of the Municipality. (c) Construction work will be carried out expeditiously, in good and work-man-like manner, in accordance with good trade practices, and, at all times, so as to minimize nuisance. (d) All necessary precautions to avoid dust, noise and other nuisances and to provide for public safety will, so far as possible, be undertaken so as to achieve compliance with all federal, provincial, or other municipal regulations or standards. (e) All necessary care will be taken to see that mud and soil is not tracked or spilled onto any public street and, where such tracking occurs, the street shall be cleaned at the end of each working day. (f) Garbage disposal facilities will be of an enclosed type located and depicted on the Site Plan as attached as Attachment "A" hereto, at all times designed in a manner satisfactory to the Municipality. (g) Unless otherwise provided, all parking lots and walkways will be finished with hot-mix asphalt, concrete or paving stones to the satisfaction of the Municipality and have permanent bumper curbing along all parking areas that abut the limits of the Lands. (h) No topsoil shall be stockpiled on any other portion of the Lands except those lands identified for that purpose in Attachment "A" to this Agreement; provided that all topsoil shall be stockpiled and maintained in a manner which allows for the maintenance of weeds and other noxious plants; and the Municipality may at all times enter the Lands for purposes of inspection of such stockpiling of topsoil and, if necessary, for purposes of maintenance of weeds, the cost of which shall be borne by the Owner and collected either in like manner as municipal taxes or from any security held by the Municipality to ensure performance of all obligations by the Owner in respect of the development of the Lands. (i) Stockpiling of snow will not be allowed on the Lands where it will constitute a hazard as determined by the Municipality. Q) The electrical servicing of the Lands shall be subject to the approval of Hydro One, or any successor utility thereto. (k) During the period of development of the Lands as contemplated by this Agreement, if the Owner fails to take any act required for public safety or convenience, as determined by the Municipality, and upon seven (7) days written notice, the Municipality, in addition to any other remedy at law, may enter upon the Lands and undertake any and all works to correct such failure and thereby reinstate such element of public safety or convenience, the cost of which municipal work shall be borne by the Owner and collected in like manner either as municipal taxes or from any security held by the Municipality to ensure performance of all obligations of the Owner hereunder. (1) The Municipality is at liberty to consider any breach of this Agreement as a violation of By-Law No. 2016-047, being the Site Plan Control By-Law for the Municipality of Bayham, and Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended, thereby constituting an offence pursuant to section 67 of the said Act and, further, entitling the Municipality to seek any manner of remedy or relief as based thereon, including but not limited to the issuance of a stop work order and/or injunction to restrain continuation of such breach. (m)Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver of the duty of the Owner to comply with any other by-law of the Municipality or any other law, whether federal or provincial in nature. 8. The Owner shall be responsible for consulting with Hydro One, or any successor utility thereto, regarding any matters which relate to utility services provided by Hydro One. 9. The Owner shall be responsible for consulting with and obtaining any necessary approval from any and all regulatory body having an interest in or jurisdiction over the development of the Lands, including but not limited to the Long Point Region Conservation Authority and the Ministry of the Environment. 10. The Owner shall satisfy all requirements in relation to fire protection for the building or buildings or structure or structures to be erected upon the Lands to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief for the Municipality of Bayham. 11. The Owner agrees to pay for damages to public property, including but not limited to any municipal drain, ditch, street surface, or storm and sanitary sewer systems, which may occur during the development of the Lands as contemplated by this Agreement. In the event that the Owner shall fail to repair any such damage within thirty (30) days of occurrence, the Municipality may enter upon the Lands and effect such repair at the sole risk and expense of the Owner. 12. The Owner agrees that any and all lighting required for the development of the Lands in accordance with this Agreement shall be installed and maintained so as not to interfere with the use or enjoyment of adjacent properties or with the safe flow of traffic on abutting or adjacent streets, the determination of which interference shall be in the sole discretion and opinion of the Municipality. 13. The Owner shall landscape and maintain plants and groundcover upon the Lands and in strict accordance with the Plans and at all times to a standard acceptable to the Municipality. 14. If the Ontario Building Code requires that an Architect or Professional Engineer, or both, shall be responsible for the field review of any new building or structure or extension thereof as contemplated by this Agreement, then the Owner shall not occupy or use or permit occupation or use of, any such building or structure or extension thereof until after an Architect or Professional Engineer has delivered approval thereof to the Municipality by a letter addressed to the Municipality and signed by the said Architect or Professional Engineer and certifying that all construction and/or services on or in the Lands, including any such building or structure or extension thereof thereon as required for the development or redevelopment of the Lands have been installed and/or constructed in a manner satisfactory to the Architect or Professional Engineer. 15. The Municipality, through its servants, officers, and agents, including its Chief Building Official, Fire Chief, and Municipal Engineer, may, from time to time and any time, enter upon the Lands and/or any building or structure being erected thereon to inspect; (a) the progress of the development upon the Lands; (b) the state of maintenance as required by this Agreement; (c) compliance with any and all laws, whether Federal, Provincial, or Municipal, including any and all by-laws for the Municipality and more particularly including By-Law No. 2016-047 as Site Plan Control By-Law; and, (d) compliance with this Agreement. 16. In the event of any servant, officer, or agent of the Municipality determining, upon inspection of the Lands and any building or structure erected thereon, that the development is not proceeding in strict accordance with the Plan, and specifications filed, that servant, officer, or agent shall forthwith place a notice requiring all work upon the Lands to be stopped and, furthermore, forward, by registered mail, a copy of such notice to the Owner at his, her, or its last known address and the Owner shall forthwith correct the deficiency in relation to which that notice relates or, alternatively, appeal to the Council of the Municipality of Bayham as hereinafter provided. 17. In the event of any servant, officer, or agent of the Municipality, having inspected the Lands or any building or structure being erected thereon in accordance with this Agreement, be of the opinion that the state of maintenance of such Lands, building, or structure is unsatisfactory, such servant, officer, or agent shall forthwith forward a notice detailing the particulars of such opinion and the basis therefor, by registered mail, to the Owner at his, her, or its last known address and the Owner shall forthwith correct the deficiency giving rise to that opinion of unsatisfactory maintenance or, alternatively, appeal such opinion and the need for correction to the Council of the Municipality of Bayham as hereinafter provided. 18. In the event that the Owner should disagree with the opinion of the servant, officer, or agent of the Municipality as to the state of compliance and/or maintenance, such Owner shall appear before the Council of the Municipality of Bayham, which Council, after hearing the details of the alleged deficiency and hearing the response of the Owner, shall express its opinion as to whether the maintenance of the lands, building, or structure is satisfactory and which decision shall constitute a final determination of the issue. 19. In the event that the Owner shall fail to obey a stop work order issued pursuant to section 16 above, the Owner acknowledges and recognizes the right of the Municipality to apply to a Court of competent jurisdiction in the Province of Ontario for appropriate relief, including but not limited to an injunction restraining continuation of work upon the Lands. 20. In the event that an Owner shall fail to correct a deficiency after notice is given pursuant to sections 16 or 17 above and which notice the Council of the Municipality of Bayham subsequently determines is correct in accordance with section 19 above, the Council of the Municipality of Bayham may by by-law direct, on default of the matter or thing being done by the Owner and after two (2) weeks written notice to the Owner as delivered by registered mail to the last known address of the Owner, that such matter or thing be done by or on behalf of the Municipality, at the expense of the Owner, which expense may be recoverable by action, as municipal taxes, or as drawn from and paid by any security deposit with the Municipality as security for full performance of all obligations by the Owner in respect of the development contemplated by this Agreement. 21. The Owner further acknowledges that any contravention of any provision of this Agreement will constitute a contravention of By-Law No. 2016-047 for the Municipality of Bayham, being the Site Plan Control By-Law, as enacted pursuant to section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, and, among other methods of remedy or relief, is subject to prosecution and penalty as provided for in section 67 of such Act. 22. Unless otherwise authorized, in the event that the Owner wishes to revise the development as described in and depicted in Attachments "A" and/or "B" attached, he, she, or it shall make application to the Council of the Municipality of Bayham for reconsideration and approval and, furthermore, the Owner agrees that construction shall not proceed so as to implement any such revision until approval is given by such Council or, alternatively and on appeal, the Ontario Municipal Board pursuant to the procedure set forth in section 41 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, c. P.13, as amended. 23. The Owner agrees to pay to the Municipality all administration costs incurred in connection with the preparation and/or implementation of this Agreement, including all legal, engineering, and inspection costs. 24. Upon execution of this Agreement and as contribution to capital charges, the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, in cash or by certified cheque, the amount of _NIL Dollars and Cents ($ 0 ). 25. Upon execution of this agreement and as contribution to Site Plan Review expenses, the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, in cash or certified cheque, the amount of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00). 26. Before commencing any of the work contemplated herein, the Owner shall supply the Municipality with a Liability Insurance Policy, or acceptable proof thereof, providing coverage to a minimum amount of $ 2,000,000 per occurrence, and in a form satisfactory to the Municipality, thereby indemnifying the Municipality from any loss arising from claims for damages, injury, or otherwise, in connection with the work to be undertaken upon the Lands and for which approval contemplated by this Agreement is granted. The said policy of insurance shall be provided at the time of execution of this Agreement and shall remain in force until the development contemplated herein is complete and all required documentation in evidence thereof has been filed with the Municipality. 27. The Owner hereby identifies the intended completion date for the development contemplated by this Agreement as on or before September 15, 2017. The Parties agree that it is a responsibility of the Owner to arrange for completion of the development contemplated by this Agreement on or before such date and, furthermore, to apply for any extension of and from such date by no later than sixty (60) days prior to such intended completion date. 28. As security for the performance and completion of all works required by this Agreement, the Owner shall provide the Municipality with a Letter of Credit, in the amount of To Be Determined Dollars and Cents ($ ). The said Letter of Credit will be based on the estimated cost of alterations to public property, roadways, curbs and gutters and drains, and any repairs for damages to public property, roadways, curbs and gutters and drains, plus all site- specific components as identified by the Site Plan and Site Servicing Plan, attached as Attachments "A" and "B", which are approved under this Agreement. The amount of the Letter of Credit shall be established by the Municipality. The irrevocable Letter of Credit will be issued by a Chartered Bank or other institution acceptable to the Municipality and provide specific reference to this Agreement and provide for the value thereof to be payable to the Municipality at any time or, in part, from time to time, upon written notice from the Municipality. The Letter of Credit shall be provided by the Owner to the Municipality at the time of execution of this Agreement and shall remain in force, until twelve (12) months after completion of the development contemplated by this Agreement, including but not limited to production of all documentation required for evidence of such due and proper completion of the Development. 29. This Agreement and the provisions thereof do not grant to the Owner, or any person acquiring any interest in the said Lands, any rights against the Municipality with respect to the failure of the Owner to perform or fully perform any of his, her, or its obligations under this Agreement or any negligence on the part of the Owner in relation to the Performance of any obligations required by this Agreement. 30. In the event that construction on the Lands has not commenced within the one (1) year from the date of registration of this Agreement against title to the Lands, the Municipality may, at its option and on one (1) month written notice to the Owner, declare this agreement to be terminated, subject to renegotiation at the option of the Municipality. In the event that the Agreement is terminated as set forth above, the Owner agrees that construction on the Lands as contemplated by this Agreement will not be commenced or continued until such time as the terms of this Agreement, at the option of the Municipality, have been renegotiated. 31. Following completion of the development of the Lands in accordance with the Plans contemplated by this Agreement and attached as Attachments "A" and "B" hereto, the Owner shall prepare, sign, and deliver to the Municipality a Certificate of Compliance in the form and of the content set forth in Attachment "C" hereto, by which Certificate the Owner shall confirm that all elements of this Site Plan Agreement have been completed in accordance with the terms hereof and the provisions of By-Law No. 2016-047, being the Site Plan Control By-Law for the Municipality. 32. The Owner agrees that he, she, or it will not call into question, directly or indirectly and in any proceeding whatsoever in law or in equity or before any administrative tribunal or court, the right of the Municipality to enter into this Agreement or to enforce each and every term, covenant, and condition herein contained and, furthermore, acknowledges that this provision may be pled as an estoppel as against the Owner in any such case. 33. The Owner agrees on behalf of himself, herself, or itself, including their respective heirs, executors, ministries, and assigns, to save harmless and indemnify the Municipality from all losses, damages, costs, charges, and expenses which may be claimed or recovered against the Municipality by any person or persons arising either directly or indirectly from any action taken by the Owner in accordance with this Agreement. 34. All facilities, works, and other matters required by this Agreement shall be provided and maintained by the Owner at its sole risk and expense but at all times to the satisfaction of the Municipality in accordance with all standards applied by the Municipality and, in default thereof and without limiting any right or claim to remedy or relief as available to the Municipality, the provisions of section 446 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, shall apply. 35. This Agreement shall be registered, at the expense of the Owner, against title to the Lands and the Municipality shall be entitled, subject to the provisions of any statute of the Province of Ontario, including but not limited to the Registry Act and/or Land Titles Act, to enforce its provisions against the Owner as named herein, including any successor in title thereto. 36. This Agreement enures to the benefit of and is binding upon the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement by their hands and seals or under cover of duly authorized officials at Bayham, Ontario this 15th day of September 2016. Signed, Sealed, and Delivered ) In the presence of ) MAX UNDERHILL'S FARM SUPPLY Name: Position: I have authority to bind the Company THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM Mayor— Paul Ens Clerk— Paul Shipway We have authority to bind the Corporation o E' .............. ®ri Q 03LWIl 31V=SSV A"S"A A9 03NVd3ad'NYId ONIDIA83S ONV ON10"D:308nos lVaniinotHov AIIQ�IQ EL a (Sb 3NI-1)UNnoo) 3NI� NOi IVO °L I ° f HO11(l BOVNIV Cl — ��` v} /rC H0110 30VNIVW { wsvezoz m.00 oauN „_.1 __— wsoos t nn.o060—N 1 kDEd0ad ""`"�. / —'--! \y, -/ I 1SY 13nd 1O3f8n5 11 O QOQ 1\ \/ ��IOI513 �01 03H5 /a01tlb3N36 R Q1e E 3. bd �tl3r.°1 n T dYW A3N ® 039 �n doee ` NId33N Il3Avl)o i ---------- solo xx °xl]x3i nv \ o351Va 1 zS 3]Id10 �Nlvw 3snoN3avM \\ m sS310N ]LL3a 1 m eNlmine I I lsrb a r 13s31o) \� now' [15v 13n3 \\ \ a OL Sl x.d Z S x < —,—•�•— •—•—•— En>mni%6l1.9°zyrcz _ 0( xsc-a°!o»,Pom o wow ww 1VQH3WW001. ^- Sb3wYlna] � LLB< mws»e ol3auoaeWJaEE° vlv3dsio wnwl°x°iw 3otla01a ` ` �� iL L z; aLrM 1 °33NOZ ltlIM1SnONI nHVd-41 W LW SNOI1Vln`J3:J'JNINOZ W1♦�� O 30 ,♦,vw sxl°w°oruoEs,ueox L o''L O +♦r. �_ snunos w,fe..osn.m o. 3sry°3:°loV3 w. I i w.n L.—•—• '` , \ oaSOUSI1V1S 3115 j I 3115 ONu51%3 % '\ w„x,r°,oexsxM'o°O,5?�c�oo w�..v ! % cxouv]m,wuevl no„vv lks�NVId 311S U S301Ab3S WbVd llIHi3ONn XVW p • jCD • � .a +°J�rtb a PP i � a L F 'si ssvxo i I °1 I i¢, 7 3 �� , AY ; Sep, 3 ♦ f , '" , '' ♦ � _J`\ alloa 4s'' U ; oruz 1 J, C �, oos A a 11 'a981 ♦ 3 is p e Y r Tw 3' 3snoH3aYM a3soad ♦ } rl ,y� • ✓•"'�• o -- dui '•\�`� / -` t\ N, P • y L 30ViS I§ • 3,u°m.°. p� �� s �. Ea a `F�L''c 3`' \`i� 111 g b fl P i i s - r C3 '�%�4 �+ .,,,a:"'�,o. +�`"' ♦ � � £t.Ee � • ♦ \ ` oa / s°' 31noa 3ald _a m 7 * > > -#' —o-_ _-e __ r q -�i9'a1S it e S o' r� ,t ♦ ♦• oL LlZ 3 i SiSIG`"" P� b'ry 61 � o J °+s osa� a m ii ri 3 `m' •r"! ) 35f1o113avM ,} 7. ,.avrom. P' a R #' + ifi : r3 i ! ♦} 6? j' PP Brc o° l—F- —2—m°auL • r a3 PP �♦P '�'r3 � EKE $i �` r r • Lu ♦ 30 d 0 Nll N HO.S 3fininj swv i e e s e ♦2 J i i q i a 9r § r� P` a i � � °an A Ste) � (xaurm'eouenl xu xr d +3 i e��y ♦ ♦ t > 8 YItlHAYB �� 30 dIHSNM01 01HdV8D03O 9 NOISS30N00 0L iol in�a�eaaaeP Nx�xa,,e,aeap I�x.nx,axw°.�nwe,n,n� �siTe . .. I for �xnvuri"a s anon rub z�wM i ��S/V/P `�� van.w°euna mrlven nor art r�uY aarl�a rw vwww caw.rum�m y i�r I z,q rye bwwi.uunwl" op J . . � .+>' _ Bg17I alxon nrenour xa,s ro eL caramucsm,s i"",m.nw wsu ro maax a..nry minas.a • I ¢ � _ are m Pnawm rw wan Iaswwu.w,av ,.>' I I '' xe won��m m eaaw aas°maarz ra«xrx,cass uo,wont x°m.m.wu,we ^ . ^ : J i` / >/\! LEGENQ �. s r / t .sn.ge msmc ne,,axn v '�.: � I..I.' � • � �\ a'h>zp'c I.> � �`' BM B mwuxa�ownw t._a »N. el P `e. a mMMIe 1 r e aresxxxxxea \� w.no x,axo n<, a" ,, r r MAX UNDERHILL'S x \ r maw a rq s 2/> t` FARM SUPPLY LTD. •Q {� '! 56532 CALTON UNE.`HENNA s GRADING AND SERVICING PLAN \',� x. :/// r ,, - ` < a w,� ` A,• IC SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED I i 4 CONSULTING ENGINEERS PNO PLANNERS F 7 �,� ^•^ N> /l i ¢ s t10.S0 �,? l/'\}�-`I XrtGa`fa 9WAIxY / h. c..r wR aaa 2 Sate wFO®ex.P SHEET ,u x®rr,o-xro 1 OF l \�w.rW.a,7maVsrnWr.nxa�are n.a io-man are w/x<oor z)m-we-ie x,z.0 Pa ATTACHMENT "C" CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: Municipal Address: Owner: This document serves to certify that the Development project on the afore-noted Lands has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Site Plan Agreement between the undersigned, as Owner, and the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham as dated September 15, 2016, and as authorized by By-Law No. 2016 - for the said Municipality of Bayham. The undersigned makes this certification declaring it to be true and correct and as if made under oath. Dated at , Ontario this day of , 20_ Witness Signature Name of Owner(Print) Address of Owner(Mailing) Telephone Number THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW 2016-081 A BY-LAW TO APPOINT STAFF TO PERFORM DUTIES UNDER THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE ACT WHEREAS Section 3(2) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c.23, as amended, provides that the council of each municipality shall appoint a chief building official and such inspectors as are necessary for the enforcement of this Act in the areas in which the municipality has jurisdiction. AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary and expedient to appoint staff to perform the duties of Chief Building Official and Inspectors under the Building Code Act. NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT Mr. William Knifton be and is hereby appointed the Chief Building Official for the Municipality of Bayham, to perform duties under the Building Code Act and Regulations thereunder, commencing September 15, 2016, and until such appointment is repealed. 2. THAT Mr. Eugenio DiMeo be and is hereby appointed the Acting Chief Building Official for the Municipality of Bayham, to perform duties under the Building Code Act and Regulations thereunder in the absence of the Chief Building Official, commencing September 15, 2016, and until such appointment is repealed. 3. THAT appointments of staff to perform duties under the Building Code Act as approved by By-law No. 2006-067, be the same are hereby repealed effective September 15 2016. 4. AND THAT this by-law shall come into full force and effect upon final passing. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 15t" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016. MAYOR CLERK THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO. 2016-082 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM ALL ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM FOR THE REGULAR MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 WHEREAS under Section 5 (1) of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O. 2001, Chapter 25, the powers of a municipal corporation are to be exercised by the Council of the municipality; AND WHEREAS under Section 5 (3) of the Municipal Act, 2001, the powers of Council are to be exercised by by-law; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it advisable that the proceedings of the meeting be confirmed and adopted by by-law. THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham in respect of each recommendation and each motion and resolution passed and other action by the Council at the regular meeting held September 15, 2016 is hereby adopted and confirmed as if all proceedings were expressly embodied in this by-law. 2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham are hereby authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the action of the Council including executing all documents and affixing the Corporate Seal. READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME and finally passed this 15t"day of September, 2016. MAYOR CLERK