Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning By-law No. Z603-2012 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO.Z603-2012 TEICHROEB BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW No.Z456-2003,AS AMENDED WHEREAS the Ontario Municipal Board issued Decision/Order on December 27, 2012, as amended by Decision/Order issued on February 13, 2013 for Case File PL120555; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary to amend Zoning By-law No.Z456-2003, as amended; THEREFORE,the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham enacts as follows: 1) THAT By-law No.Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Schedule 'A', Map No.29,by deleting the easterly hamlet boundary lines of Richmond shown in solid lines and adding new boundary lines which are shown in heavy solid lines on Schedule 'A' to this By-law, which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 2) THAT By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Schedule `E', Map Richmond,by deleting from the Agricultural(Al)zone and adding to the Hamlet Residential (HR)Zone those lands which are outlined in heavy solid lines and marked"HR-7"on Schedule 'B' to this By-law, which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 3) THAT By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Section 9.12 EXCEPTIONS—Hamlet Residential(HR)Zone,by adding the following new subsections. "9.12.7 9.12.7.1 Minimum Lot Front Yard Depth 35m from centre line 9.12.72 Supplemental Regulations Amenity structures, including but not limited to gazebos, decks, and porches shall be located in the rear yard" 4) THIS By-law comes into force: a) Where no notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto,upon the expiration of the prescribed time; or b) Where notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto, upon the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 21"DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013. READ A BIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 21'DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013. a1411, ,,..:---0D d-A\''6- 1-11:-&-4-----f MA iOR CLERK MAP 29 4 NI HR-7 ` ` MAP 30 aviek, 44% 14b ar 14414 loom. ,... N. I 1 ,I �0 ` moovER V4CL£y R 4 poll I 44 MAP 39 it ' '�J11II 44 i ♦ 1 I i si, thI MAP 38 This is Schedule "B" to By—law No, ZB03-2012 passed 21st day of February 2013. MAY R CLERK MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM 0 100m 250m SCHEDULE 'E' Scale : 5000 RICHMOND ,y 4 21 11 Al w a _ c 2 a � } � Pr (Temporary August,a.aum N.S.T.R. RR LOT 109 LOT 110 1 Al _ \1 460 RICHMOND This 1a Schedule ,[` to By—law No, (SEE SCHEDULE 'E) 2803-2812 passed the 21st day of February 2013 2/4.2--c\ J A—AYOR CLERK MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM 0 250m 500m MAP No. 29 SCHEDULE 'N . Scale 1 : 12,500 i ISSUE DATE: February 13, 2013 PL120555 1131.40ssf121 Ontario Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de ('Ontario Cornelius and Sara Teichroeb have appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board under subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, from Council's refusal to enact a proposed amendment to Zoning By-law Z456-2003 of the Municipality of Bayham to rezone lands respecting 53680 Heritage Line from Agricultural (A1) Zone to Hamlet Residential (HR) Zone to rezone the subject property to a hamlet residential use and to bring the zoning for the subject property into conformity with the Official Plan designation as a result of a boundary expansion of the Hamlet of Richmond OMB File No.: PL120555 APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel*(Agent Cornelius and Sara Teichroeb D. Roe Municipality of Bayham F. Tranquilli* AMENDING DECISION BY C. HEFFERON AND ORDER OF THE BOARD [1] The Board's Decision/Order issued on December 27, 2012, is hereby amended by replacing paragraph [2] with the following: [2] On April 25, 2012, Elgin County Land Division Committee granted consent to subdivide the subject lands into three lots. The consent was subject to a number of conditions. [2] The Board's Decision/Order issued on December 27, 2012 is further amended by replacing the first sentence of paragraph [3] with the following: [3] As a condition of granting consent, the Elgin County Land Division Committee, as the Approval Authority, required Mr. and Ms. Teichroeb to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality. - 2 - PL120555 [3] The Board's Decision/Order issued on December 27, 2012, is further amended by replacing the last sentence of paragraph [4] with the following: [4] Mr. and Ms. Teichroeb, owners of the subject lands, appealed Council's decision to refuse the zoning amendment to the Ontario Municipal board ("Board"). [4] The Board's Decision/Order issued on December 27, 2012, is further amended by replacing the paragraph [10] point 2 with the following: 2. New residences will be set back a minimum of 35 m from the centre of the road. Section 4.22 of Zoning By-law Z456-2003 requires a 25 m setback. [5] The Board's Decision/Order issued on December 27, 2012, is further amended by replacing the first sentence of paragraph [18] with the following: [181 Previously, under s. 4.22 of the By-law a minimum front yard setback of 25 m was required. [6] The Board's Decision/Order issued on December 27, 2012, is further amended by replacing paragraph [24] with the following: [24] The Board orders that the appeal is allowed in part. [7] The Board's Decision/Order issued on December 27, 2012, is further amended by replacing Attachment 1 with Amended Attachment 1 hereby attached. [8] In all other respects the Board's Decision/Order remains the same. "C. Hefferon" C. HEFFERON MEMBER - 3 - PL120555 ATTACHMENT 1 oe THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO.Z603-2012 TEICHROEB BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW No.Z456-2003,AS AMENDED WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary to amend Zoning By-law No.Z456-2003,as amended; THEREFORE,the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham enacts as follows: • 1) THAT By-law No.Z456-2003,as amended,is hereby further amended•by amending Schedule'A',Map No.29,by deleting the easterly hamlet boundary lines of Richmond shown in solid lines and adding new boundary lines which are shown in heavy solid lines on Schedule'A'to this By-law,which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 2) THAT By-law No.Z456-2003,as amended,it hereby further amended by amending Schedule'E',Map Richmond,by deleting from the Agricultural(Al)zone and adding to the Hamlet Residential(HIR)Zone those lands which are outlined in heavy solid lines and marked"HR 7"on Schedule'B'to this By-law, which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 3) THAT By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Section 9.12 EXCEPTIONS—Hamlet Residential(BR)Zone,by adding the following new subsections. "9.12.7 9.12.7.1 Minimum Lot Front Yard Depth 35mfrom centre line 9.12.72 Sunnlemential Regulations Amenity structures,including but not limited to gazebos, decks,and porches shall be located in the rear yard." 4) THIS By-law comes into force: a) Where no notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto,upon the expiration of the prescribed time; or b) Where notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto,upon the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS_DAY OF 20 LAID A THIRD TIME.AND FINALLY PASSED THIS DAY OF 20 P die - tnPUTY CLERK MAYOR CLERK of the Corpora-11c of the Mun jpipajity oFBs wm, cee io oiag i ,ce '� - 4 - PL120555 aj RR •W o r ' Al—A Ai—T2 t rau. MIRA tx mW RR LOT 109 ( LOT 110 1� A\1 � Ng 11111 _ RICHMOND -Yhh ie Schedule'A't0 er-Iaw ( SCUM='E') No. 2603-2012 peeled fhe— day . of TO_ MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM ° 250 m500m MAP No. 29 7 SCHEDULE 'A' scale 1 : 12,500 iS,1. P,.Q ti;T N LL, 91<PUTs''TURK of the Carpora4 of the Munk of Bayh: co '. _ ,4oFegel1. is' .rt.t ..,- ,t rate 0! A ; 4, 2 - 5 - PLS 20555 sto 11% r KIP 30 lir Air 44% am• 14 1/ 4.111 se.N. I 4k *4 rf • 1 I ♦ l / .400 #* jr • This to Sch0dula `B`to By-low NNf. 2803-2012 pooped —doy 20_.. MAYOR CLERK f ' MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHA1room 25 drn SCHEDULE 'E' �aie1. 500Q RICHMOND, t;' ISSUE DATE: . Dec. 27, 2012 *** PL120555 Ontario Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l'Ontario Cornelius and Sara Teichroeb have appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board under subsection 34(11) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, from Council's refusal to enact a proposed amendment to Zoning By-law Z456-2003 of the Municipality . of Bayham to rezone lands respecting 53680 Heritage Line from Agricultural (A1) Zone to Hamlet Residential (HR) Zone to rezone the subject property to a hamlet residential use and to bring the zoning for the subject property into conformity with the Official Plan designation as a result of a boundary expansion of the Hamlet of Richmond OMB File No.: PL120555 r4.4Y L APPEARANCES: I a JAN — 2113 Parties Counsel*/Agent j`ii$j dICIPLF.7 i4 Cornelius and Sara Teichroeb D. Roe Municipality of Bayham F. Tranquilli* DECISION DELIVERED BY C. HEFFERON AND ORDER OF THE BOARD BACKGROUND [1] Cornelius and Sara Teichroeb applied to the Municipality of Bayham for consent to subdivide their approximately 23.5 ha lands municipally known as 53680 Heritage Line in the Hamlet of Richmond ("subject lands") in order to create two building lots. The proposed retained lot compromises approximately 23 ha and contains a house. The proposed severed lots 1 and 2 each comprise approximately 0.4 ha and are currently Vdud' Tile S ari Report dated November a, 2012, which recommends approvai of the requested consents was entered in evidence as Exhibit 2, Tab 5. A description of the subject lands is shown on page 30 in Exhibit 2, Tab 5. [2] On April 27, 2012, Council granted consent to subdivide the subject lands into three lots. The consent was subject to a number of conditions. - 2 - PL120555 [3] As a condition of granting the consent, the Municipality of Bayham, as the Approval Authority, required Mr. and Ms. Teichroeb to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality. Rezoning of the lands from Agricultural ("Al") to Hamlet Residential ("HR") was required to bring the zoning into conformity with the Municipality of Bayham Official Plan ("OP") designation of "Hamlets". The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing approved the review of the 2001 Official Plan on January 10, 2012. The OP was entered to evidence as Exhibit 2, Tab 3. [4] Larry and Linda Milmine, who own and operate a dairy farm located within the required Minimum Distance Separation ("MDS") from the subject lands, opposed the rezoning application on the grounds that residential uses within the MDS would restrict operations of their 300-head dairy farm. Mr. and Ms. Milmine appealed Council's decision to the Ontario Municipal Board ("Board"). CORE ISSUE [5] The core issue here is the application of the MDS. The Minimum Distance Separation Implementation Guidelines formulae require that MDS protect agricultural lands for agricultural uses. The Guidelines specify a minimum distance separation between livestock farming operations and sensitive (i.e., residential) uses not related to the livestock farming operations. [61 Mr. and Ms. Milmine contended that the Teichroeb's requested severances would compromise the long-term viability of their livestock operations because the subject lands were located within that MDS. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT [7] Prior to the commencement of the hearing of the appeal of Council's decision to thBoar-', 1rnmAr4iVJ jointly Inf-vrv-tA t rQVVnrV kUhun+ Nc.ctt!vmrrrnt bctiNccn the nnrFir.n 1JL 1 t1JJ had been agreed to. The settlement involved modifications to the Subdivision Agreement, which has been entered to the evidence as Exhibit 4. EVIDENCE AND FINDINGS [8] The Board was informed that having accepted the proposed settlement, Mr and Ms. Milmine did not appear at the Board hearing into this matter, - 3 - PL120555 [9] Mr. David Roe who had been retained by Mr. and Ms. Teichroeb, was qualified by the Board to present opinion evidence on land use planning. He testified on behalf of both parties to these proceedings --the Teichroebs and the Municipality of Bayham. [10] He advised that the Subdivision Agreement provided for conditions that have been designed to protect the Milmine's livestock operations from complaints from future owners of the severed lands. These conditions include: 1. Outdoor amenities structures will be restricted to the rear yard, that is, the area behind any new residential buildings 2. New residences will be set back a minimum of 35 m from the centre of the road. Section 9.8 of Zoning By-law Z456-2003 requires a 6 m setback 3. Notice will be included on title of the proposed severed lots that livestock farming operations are being conducted within the MDS 4. New residences built on the proposed severed lots will include central air conditioning, which will reduce the potential for adverse impact from agricultural odours emanating from the livestock farming operations on the new residences. [11] Zoning By-law Z603-2012, which incorporates the land use component of the above conditions (i.e., conditions 1 and 2), amends the comprehensive municipal Zoning By-law Z456-2003, as amended. Zoning By-law Z603-2012 was entered to evidence as Exhibit 3. [12] The Board accepts Mr. Roe's unopposed evidence and finds that the proposed mitigation measures incorporated into the Subdivision Agreement and Zoning By-law Z603-2012 satisfy the intent of the MDS Implementation Guidelines formula 1. [13] Mr. Roe then took the Board to various policies in the OP. He advised the Board that s. 1.1 of OP recognizes that the "predominant use of land in the Municipality will be agricultural in nature" but that "some additional urban types of development (outside the three villages identified) will also be established and maintained... in the hamlets". He testified that the requested severances and implementing site specific Zoning By-law 2603-2012, conform to this provision. - 4 - PL120555 [14] He testified that both the proposed severed lots comply with MDS Formula 1. The existing home on the retained lot is, however, within the MDS Formula 1 minimum separation distance. Mr. Roe took the Board to OP policy 2.1 .2.2, which provides that MDS Formula 1 is "not applied to existing lots" in the Municipality. [15] The Board accepts Mr. Roe's unopposed testimony and finds that the existing (retained) lot qualifies for the exemption under OP policy 2.1.2.2 and that the conditions of development for proposed severed lots (as required for the consent) represent good planning. [16] OP policy 4.4.1 provides controls for the development within "Hamlets" within the Municipality. It provides for the maximum permitted number of lots within a hamlet, servicing requirements, as well as required buffering to mitigate conflicts between land uses. The Board accepts Mr. Roe's unopposed evidence and finds that the requested subdivision conforms to the relevant provisions of the OP for development within designated "Hamlets". [17] Mr. Roe then took the Board to the relevant provision of the By-law. Zoning By- law Z603-2012 amends the lot area minimum front yard setback and amenity structure provisions of the By-law by adding a new s. 9.12. [18] Previously, under 9.3 of the By-law a minimum front yard setback of 6 m was required. However, new s. 9.12 requires a minimum front yard setback of 35 m as measured from the centre line of the public road for each of the proposed severed lots. In addition, new s. 9.12 provides that amenity structures such as gazebos, porches, and decks must be located in the rear yard. [19] Zoning By-law Z603-2012 further amends the By-law by deleting the portion of the Agricultural (A1) zone where the proposed severed lots are located and adding it to the Hamlet Residential (HR) zone. The affected lands are outlined with a heavy dark line and marked HR-7, as shown in Exhibit 3, Schedule E. [20] Zoning By-law Z603-2012 also amends the By-law by revising the easterly hamlet boundary lines as shown in Exhibit 3, Schedule A. . 5 - PIA 20555 [21] The Board accepts Mr. Roe's unopposed evidence and finds that the proposed severed lots represents good planning. [22] The Board also accepts Mr. Roe's unopposed evidence and finds that the five- year review brought the policies of the 2001 OP into consistency with the policies of the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement. [23] Finally, the Board accepts Mr. Roe's unopposed evidence and finds that the proposed subdivision has adequate regard to the provisions of s. 51(24) of the Planning Act. ORDER [24] The Board orders that the appeal is dismissed in part. [25] The Board orders that Zoning By-law Z456-2003, as amended, is further amended substantially in accordance with Exhibit 3, which is attached to this Order as Attachment 1. [26] The Board orders that the Subdivision Agreement entered in evidence as Exhibit 4 and attached to this Order as Attachment 2 is approved. "C. Hefferon" C. HEFFERON MEMBER - 6 - PL120555 ATTACHMENT I Cee 3 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM BY-LAW NO.Z6032012 TRICHROEB BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW No.Z456-2003,AS AMENDED WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham deems it necessary to amend Zoning By-law No.Z456-2003,as amended; THEREFORE,the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Bayham enacts as follows: 1) THAs'By-law No.Z456-2003,as amended,is hereby further amended•by amending Schedule'A',Map No.29,by deleting the easterly hamlet boundary lines of Richmond shown in solid lines and adding new boundary lines which are shown in heavy solid lines on Schedule'A'to this By-law,which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 2) THAT By-law No.Z456-2003,as amended,is hereby further amended by amending Schedule'E',Map Richmond,by deleting from the Agricultural(AI)zone and adding to the Hamlet Residential(HR)Zone those lands which are outlined in heavy solid lines and marked"BR-7"on.Schedule`B'to this By-law, which schedule is attached to and forms part of this By-law. 3) THAT By-law No. Z456-2003, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending Section 9.12 EXCEPTIONS—Hamlet Residential(HR)Zone,by adding the following new subsections. "9.12.7 9.12.7.1 Minimum Lot Front Yard Depth 35m from centre line 9.12.72 Supplemental Regulations Amenity structures,including but not limited to gazebos, decks,and porches shall be located in the rear yard." 4) THIS By-law comes into force: a) Where no notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto,upon the expiration of the prescribed time; or b) Where notice of objection has been filed with the Municipal Clerk r,ithin the time prescribed by the Planning Act and regulations pursuant thereto,upon the approval of the Ontario Municipal Board. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIIVIE THIS DAY OF . 20 READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS DAY OF 20 T1,-MA Cl�12}?'t'9 EPUTY CLERK MAYOR CLERK of theCarpor.,t' the MunpipaJityofBa :m, ce f t ,y t� ing ce•• ied Vtie•ADate y / ti A r-'r arf 1 - 7 - PL120555 • ��— Al a_ N u y 4 Al—A 111 • r_ Al—TTzrzor2 N.S.T.R. RR LOT 109 LOT 110 MEW A ■ '1 RICHMOND 7)de Is Schedule'A'to Sy—los/ (SEE SC71EIX1LE'L') Ka zSOa-2014 passed the— dBY 213-- MAYOR 0MAYOR CLERK MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM 25Ctrn 500m MAP No. 29 /r'\ SCHEDULE 'A' Scala 1 : 12,500 1. 1 �> , *FiltTY--"LSRK of the Corporate) of the Munk':a' of i3ayh. EU' 'l &efeg ')a is• �'9 P. co aye 2 - 8 - PL120555 ATTACHMENT 2 This Subdivision Agreement made in duplicate this 15th day of November 2012. BETWEEN: CORNELIUS AND SARA TEICHROBB hereinafter called"the Owner" OF THE FIRST PART -and- THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM hereinafter called"the Municipality" OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Owner has applied for a consent to sever land located in the Municipality of Bayhatn,pursuant to Section 53(l)of the Planning Act,R.S.O. 1990,c.P.13; • AND WHEREAS pursuant to Section 53(12)of the Planning Act,the Approval Authority may require that an agreement be entered into between the Municipality and the applicant, AND WHEREAS the Approval Authority has imposed a condition in this matter, requiring that the Applicant enter into a subdivision agreement, NOW THEREFORE WITNESSETH that in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration now paid by the Municipality to the Owner(the receipt and sufficiency of which the Owner hereby acknowledges),the Municipality and the Owner covenant and agree and provide with each other that the Owner shall do and perform at no expense to the Municipality(unless otherwise expressly provided herein)the following matters and things: The Lands 1. This approval pertains to the lands and premises of the Owner more particularly described in Attachment"A"attached hereto("the Lands")consisting of lands described as Part Lot 110 Concession NTR. List of Attachments 2. The following Attachments are hereby declared to form part of the Agreement between the parties: Attachment rte ,-,z"+;,,., "A" Description of Lands "B" Lot layout plan 1,MARGARET ZlkrnLL,DEPUTY CLERK of the Cover; 5.6 oftlie i . of n,t 70001.6 at "ply ectPrue J( , — 9 — PL120555 -2- Platt of Survey 3. The Lands shall be created through consent in accordance with the plan,attached as Attachment"B"to this Agreement. Notice to Future Property Owners 4. The Owner shall provide written notification to future purchasers of the lands that an intensive livestock operation exists in the vicinity located at 53565&53567 Heritage Line. On-Site Residential Air-conditioning 5. Dwellings constructed on the said lands will be equipped with central air- conditioning. Expenses 6. Any action required-to be taken by the Owner or the Municipality pursuant to this Agreement shall be at the Owner's expense. By-laws 7. The Owner shall,notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement,be subject to all by- laws of the Municipality and statutes of the Province of Ontario,including those By-laws and statutes that require the payment of fees. In the event of conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any statute or by-law,the provisions of the statute or by-law prevail. Default by Owner 8. The Municipality may determine and declare the Owner to be in default of its obligations under this Agreement through written notice to the Owner of not less thirty(30)days measured from the time that such notice is sent to the Owner by registered mail and addressed to the address shown on the assessment roll as updated from time to time on the records of the Municipal Clerk. The notice will identify the provision(s)under which the owner is in default. Subsequent Owners Bound 9. Subject to the provisions of the Registry Act and the Land?hies Act,the covenants, agreements,conditions and understandings herein contained on the part of the Owner shall be conditions running with the land described in Attachment"A"attached hereto, and shall be binding upon the Owner,its heirs,executors,administrators,successors,and assigns,as the case may be as subsequent owners and occupiers of the said Lands from time to time(and"Owner"wherever used in this Agreement is intended and shall be construed to include such subsequent owners and occupiers)and shall be appurtenant to the adjoining highways in the ownership of the Municipality. Suptu.htte Covenants 10. AlI of the provisions of this Agreement are intended to be construed as covenants and agreements as though the words importing such covenants and agreements were used in each separate clause hereof.•Should any provision of this Agreement be adjudged 1,MARIGARE'l' J ERI-iILL,DEPUTY CLERK of the Col ora'. of the Munici•JI'3'of Ba;win, Cert [, ,',_is= . rVEed,tae . ted ; e. ,t cvtms �' - 10 - PL120555 -3- unlawful or not enforceable,it shall be considered separate and severable from the Agreement and its remaining provisions as though the unlawful or unenforceable provision had not been included. Number and Gender 11. Words importing the singular shall include the plural. Words importing a gender shall include the other gender and corporations. Notice 12. Any notice by the Municipality to the Owner shall be delivered or sent by registered mail and addressed to the address shown on the assessment roll as updated from time to time on the records of the Municipal Clerk. Any notice by the Owner to.the Municipality shall be delivered or sent by registered mail to the Municipal Clerk. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Municipality has hereto affixed its corporate seal attested by the hands of its duly authorized officers and the Owner has hereunto set his corporate seal attested by the hands of its duly authorized officers. I have the authority to bind the Corporation. THE CORPORATION OF THE OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAYHAM /9,1194 Cornelius Teichroeb,Owner Paul Ens,Mayor Sara Teichroeb,Owner Lynda Millard,Clerk /of Inc_. I,MARGARET UIVDERHILL,DEPUTY CLERK of the Corporate of fie Municipality of Bad ham, cart 011 s - oin a fie, ...�. e'�'.J % /.I% /' 11 - PL120555 -4- ATTACHMENT'A' Description of Lands Concession 7 NTR Part Lot 110,Parts . on registered Plan I1R- geographic Township of Bayham,now Municipality of Bayham in the County of EIgin,Province of Ontario I,MARGARET UNDERHILL,DEPUTY CLERK of the Corpo0,0 of the Munich ity of Bay}333n, cel RaSing ipa,4lfled 'ue 96p . /9 (at • �i vr, va 1..� I 4 • 12 - PL 120555 RY-re CR ME T ,` MT OF LOT 110 CONCESSION NORTh CF TM9MY ROAD. Z r � Ir Cr DAVMV • ° Cr BA1ffMN COUNTY OF ELGIN . \ • KIM RUSTED SIA14E11146 Lm i we to aawc METRA In1S4110.1 "'w TO RET 1 PAR \ \ \ LEGEND \ DEWIER TO RE RETAINED DENOTES To RE SEVERED 1/7/1/ 11:::3 'per &Re11 SuIMLF.GT "TO_ AREAS: . BDt.hSIoiJ A6m-r -a— PART I•11 ,5 SQUARE HENS(SAO 1 ,f "L. ,"!! '4. $E•�,„. PART 2.MU SQUARE I MAE5(5040 M3ES) _ ` ,y/7 , 1 PART 3•=IMO SQUARE WIRES(65.3 ANE ) its 1 'w + ^. *.......-N.,,� +t, I,MARGARET UNDERHILL,DEPU'Y CLERK N. ` `'`, of the Corpor- 41 of the Muni i ay of h .am. ceiii 1 a ;wfl , rue �is( ♦ iwirii :\JOBS 2012\09--8773SKETCH.dwg, 12/03/2012 4:00;'19 PM, KfP1.pc3 J w 1 s